alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
Statistics
NGStatistics: Newsgroup Statistics Program
Version 1.1 (using News::Scan)
Copyright (C) 2002 'Cab',
Based on groupstat, Copyleft (C) 2000 H. Alex LaHurreau
Based on StatNews, Copyleft (C) 1998 Davide G. M. Salvetti
Newsgroup.................: alt.activism.death-penalty
Stats Were Taken..........: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:47:01 GMT
Stats Begin...............: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 14:38:16 GMT
Stats End.................: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:42:46 GMT
Days......................: 7
Total No. of Articles.....: 1127
Total No. of Characters...: 3162403
Total Volume..............: 3088
Messages Per Day..........: 161.0
Characters Per Day........: 451771.9
Average Daily Volume......: 441 kB
Total Posters This Week...: 69
Messages with Sigs........: 21.47%
Original Content Rating...: 43.17%
Top 10 Prolific Posters: Posts / Posts per Day / Percent Share
==============================================================
1. Desmond Coughlan..................................: 180 25.7 16.0%
2. Dr. Dolly Coughlan................................: 177 25.3 15.7%
3. A Planet Visitor..................................: 135 19.3 12.0%
4. Incubus...........................................: 102 14.6 9.1%
5. Mr Q. Z. Diablo...................................: 74 10.6 6.6%
6. richj7............................................: 64 9.1 5.7%
7. Rev. Don Kool.....................................: 55 7.9 4.9%
8. Jigsaw1695........................................: 47 6.7 4.2%
9. David McDonald....................................: 46 6.6 4.1%
10. David Wilson......................................: 28 4.0 2.5%
Top 10 Bandwidth-Slurping Posters: kBytes / kBytes per Day / Percent Share
==========================================================================
1. Dr. Dolly Coughlan................................: 621 88.7 20.1%
2. A Planet Visitor..................................: 543 77.7 17.6%
3. Desmond Coughlan..................................: 404 57.7 13.1%
4. richj7............................................: 210 30.0 6.8%
5. Incubus...........................................: 210 30.0 6.8%
6. Mr Q. Z. Diablo...................................: 185 26.5 6.0%
7. Rev. Don Kool.....................................: 118 17.0 3.9%
8. Earl Evleth.......................................: 98 14.0 3.2%
9. Jigsaw1695........................................: 93 13.4 3.0%
10. JüRgen............................................: 76 11.0 2.5%
Top 10 Popular Threads: Posts / Posts per Day / Percent Share
=============================================================
1. Prior Metro Experience............................: 94 13.4 8.3%
2. Opinions!.........................................: 88 12.6 7.8%
3. killing is wrong..................................: 74 10.6 6.6%
4. Armed Pilots Save Lives...........................: 64 9.1 5.7%
5. Bush the TEXECUTIONER.............................: 62 8.9 5.5%
6. Poor old Desi, drunk again! - was hello...........: 42 6.0 3.7%
7. Yes, he does exist................................: 35 5.0 3.1%
8. Good news for Dezi!!!!!!!!!!!.....................: 30 4.3 2.7%
9. Have things really changed?.......................: 28 4.0 2.5%
10. TROLL ABUSE WARNING! (was Re: Bush the TEXECUTION: 27 3.9 2.4%
Top 10 Bandwidth-Slurping Threads: kBytes / kBytes per Day / Percent Share
==========================================================================
1. Prior Metro Experience............................: 234 33.5 7.6%
2. Opinions!.........................................: 223 31.9 7.2%
3. Bush the TEXECUTIONER.............................: 208 29.7 6.7%
4. killing is wrong..................................: 182 26.1 5.9%
5. Armed Pilots Save Lives...........................: 150 21.5 4.9%
6. On the Administration of the DP...................: 117 16.8 3.8%
7. Poor old Desi, drunk again! - was hello...........: 111 15.9 3.6%
8. Non-executions in New Jersey, they can't find a Me: 97 13.9 3.1%
9. Deterrence, incarcerations influence on crime rate: 87 12.6 2.8%
10. TROLL ABUSE WARNING! (was Re: Bush the TEXECUTION: 82 11.8 2.7%
Top 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (All Bytes)
===============================================================
1. Earl Evleth...............................................: 92.2%
2. Anonymous.................................................: 85.6%
3. Jigsaw1695................................................: 74.6%
4. Dave Proctor..............................................: 72.2%
5. David Wilson..............................................: 66.9%
6. Rush Wickes...............................................: 63.9%
7. Shane.....................................................: 59.2%
8. A Planet Visitor..........................................: 58.1%
9. dirtdogFUCKOFF............................................: 57.1%
10. Desmond Coughlan..........................................: 56.9%
Bottom 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (All Bytes)
==================================================================
1. Dr. Dolly Coughlan........................................: 13.3%
2. David McDonald............................................: 26.8%
3. Incubus...................................................: 29.1%
4. richj7....................................................: 30.9%
5. JüRgen....................................................: 36.0%
6. Rev. Don Kool.............................................: 38.0%
7. Donna Evleth..............................................: 40.5%
8. Dirtdog...................................................: 42.6%
9. Cerberus..................................................: 50.1%
10. Peter Morris..............................................: 51.1%
Top 10 Crossposting Groups: Posts in Group
==========================================
1. rec.arts.drwho...............................................: 33
2. alt.fan.scarecrow............................................: 20
3. alt.parenting.solutions......................................: 11
4. alt.parenting................................................: 10
5. alt.consciousness.4th-way....................................: 7
6. alt..........................................................: 5
7. bitterness...................................................: 5
8. soc.culture.pakistan.........................................: 5
9. alt.cascade..................................................: 4
10. alt.z........................................................: 4
===========================================
End of stats for alt.activism.death-penalty
Rev. Don Kool
Statistics wrote:
Poor Desi "ScriptKiddie" Coughlan, drunk again. :-(
Yours in Christ,
Don
--
*************************** You a bounty hunter?
* Rev. Don McDonald, SCSA * Man's gotta earn a living.
* Baltimore, MD * Dying ain't much of a living, boy.
*************************** "Outlaw Josey Wales"
Incubus
"Rev. Don Kool" <old...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3DEA2495...@comcast.net...
>
>
> Statistics wrote:
>
> Poor Desi "ScriptKiddie" Coughlan, drunk again. :-(
LOL. It is obviously our lovely Desi but what i want to know is where he
gets some of his figures from. Perhaps he makes them up :-)
A Planet Visitor
"Incubus" <inc...@river.styx> wrote in message news:FDqG9.1439$Lk4.1...@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net...
Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it up),
in the construction of your sentence?
PV
David McDonald
wrote:
>
>
> NGStatistics: Newsgroup Statistics Program
> Version 1.1 (using News::Scan)
>
> Copyright (C) 2002 'Cab',
> Based on groupstat, Copyleft (C) 2000 H. Alex LaHurreau
> Based on StatNews, Copyleft (C) 1998 Davide G. M. Salvetti
>
>Bottom 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (All Bytes)
>==================================================================
> 1. Dr. Dolly Coughlan........................................: 13.3%
> 2. David McDonald............................................: 26.8%
> 3. Incubus...................................................: 29.1%
> 4. richj7....................................................: 30.9%
> 5. JüRgen....................................................: 36.0%
> 6. Rev. Don Kool.............................................: 38.0%
> 7. Donna Evleth..............................................: 40.5%
> 8. Dirtdog...................................................: 42.6%
> 9. Cerberus..................................................: 50.1%
> 10. Peter Morris..............................................: 51.1%
How can Dolly be even 13% original? Your methodology is certainly
flawed.
Deswaldo, this is simple arithmetic, not differential calculus!
>===========================================
>End of stats for alt.activism.death-penalty
Next time, do it right.
David
dirtdog
<snip>
>
> How can Dolly be even 13% original? Your methodology is certainly
> flawed.
>
> Deswaldo, this is simple arithmetic, not differential calculus!
>
The headers (which are pasted into PV's, ahem, Dolly's replies to
Desmond's posts) and the moronic footnotes, fuckwit.
<premature and rather mistaken declaration of victory snipped>
--
------------------------
w00f - dirtdog in France
dirtdog @ fruffrant.com
------------------------
David McDonald
<nospam_...@zeouane.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:29:43 -0500, David McDonald <David_M...@subspacemail.com> wrote :
>> How can Dolly be even 13% original? Your methodology is certainly
>> flawed.
>>
>> Deswaldo, this is simple arithmetic, not differential calculus!
>
>The headers (which are pasted into PV's, ahem, Dolly's replies to
>Desmond's posts) and the moronic footnotes, fuckwit.
Then the statistics are certainly flawed. Louise, these items should
be excluded from the dataset. I wouldn't expect you to understand.
David
>
><premature and rather mistaken declaration of victory snipped>
another example of Louise's failed education demonstrated.
Rev. Don Kool
Incubus wrote:
> "Rev. Don Kool" <old...@comcast.net> wrote...
>>Statistics wrote:
>>Poor Desi "ScriptKiddie" Coughlan, drunk again. :-(
>
>
> LOL. It is obviously our lovely Desi but what i want to know is where he
> gets some of his figures from. Perhaps he makes them up :-)
"Perhaps"???????
Rev. Don Kool
David McDonald wrote:
> Statistics <statist...@zeouane.org> wrote:
[...off-topic script kiddie blather snipped...]
> How can Dolly be even 13% original? Your methodology is certainly
> flawed.
Duh. Desi is a script kiddie. No more, no less. He has no idea what
he runs, he just spews it on USENET assuming that other people are as
clueless and orphaned as he.
Hope this helps,
Don
dirtdog
<snip my education of Little Gay David>
> Then the statistics are certainly flawed. Louise, these items should
> be excluded from the dataset. I wouldn't expect you to understand.
>
Why should they be, 'David'? The content is posted by PV, ahem, DOlly and
so therefore quite plainly forms part of the statistics.
Massaging figures to suit one's purposes is more the action of corrupt
politicians such as Sharp than nasty little stalkers like yourself. You
would be well advised to stick to form and spend your time dancing naked
in front of a mirror wearing a 'Desi Mask'* and cutting yourself than
attempting to make intelligent comment.
--
------------------------
w00f - dirtdog in France
dirtdog @ fruffrant.com
------------------------
*- Try tucking your cock in between your legs and 'doing a vag' while you
do this for that real 'closet serial killer' thrill.
Incubus
"A Planet Visitor" <abc...@abcxyz.com> wrote in message
news:P7sG9.339349$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
what do you mean "Desi look it up"? I had to look it up. Why didn't you use
thw word, "redundant"?
Mr Q. Z. Diablo
dirtdog...@fruffrant.com wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:29:43 -0500, David McDonald
> <David_M...@subspacemail.com> wrote :
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > How can Dolly be even 13% original? Your methodology is certainly
> > flawed.
> >
> > Deswaldo, this is simple arithmetic, not differential calculus!
> >
>
> The headers (which are pasted into PV's, ahem, Dolly's replies to
> Desmond's posts) and the moronic footnotes, fuckwit.
Poor Davey...unable to differentiate between the work of a computer
program and a human doing "simple arithmetic".
I have to giggle at his implication that differential calculus is
somehow tricky, too. What a fucking retard little Davey is.
Mr Q. Z. D.
--
Drinker, systems administrator, wannabe writer, musician and all-round bastard.
"...Base 8 is just like base 10 really... ((o))
If you're missing two fingers." - Tom Lehrer ((O))
Mr Q. Z. Diablo
Visitor" <abc...@abcxyz.com> wrote:
> pleonastic
A fine word and one that I keep meaning to use more often.
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 01:40:17 +0000
>
>le Sun, 01 Dec 2002 18:01:19 GMT, dans l'article
><P7sG9.339349$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor
><abc...@abcxyz.com> a dit ...
>
>>> > Statistics wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Poor Desi "ScriptKiddie" Coughlan, drunk again. :-(
>
>>> LOL. It is obviously our lovely Desi but what i want to know is where he
>>> gets some of his figures from. Perhaps he makes them up :-)
>
>> Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it up),
>> in the construction of your sentence?
>
>LOL ... oh, LOL !! Poor, insecure little LDB ... :-(
>
>--
>Desmond Coughlan |Yamaha YZF-R1
>desmond @ zeouane.org |'Ze Ouane!'
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!newsfeed1.bredband.com!br
edband!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berli
n.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 01:40:17 +0000
>Lines: 19
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <1mdesa...@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <asctoh$q7k9p$1...@ID-91468.news.dfncis.de>
><3DEA2495...@comcast.net>
><FDqG9.1439$Lk4.1...@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net>
><P7sG9.339349$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1038793643 28061847 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
>X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
>X-OS: BSD UNIX
>X-No-Archive: true
>Mail-Copies-To: never
>X-Obsessive-Litany: http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>X-Chats: http://www.zeouane.org/chats/
>X-PGP: http://www.zeouane.org/pgp/pubring.pkr
>X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3F1F C838 88D5 2659 B00A 6DF6 6883 FB9C E34A AC93
>User-Agent: tin/1.5.14-20020926 ("Soil") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.5-RELEASE (i386))
>
>
The Dr. Dolly Coughlan archive exists because Desmond Coughlan lacks conviction
in his words. He won't allow his posts to be archived in Google. Please feel
free to use it to your advantage.
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:07:56 +0000
>
>le Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:55:03 -0000, dans l'article
><erwG9.36$lO2....@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net>, Incubus
><inc...@river.styx> a dit ...
>
>{ snip }
>
>>> Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it
>> up),
>>> in the construction of your sentence?
>
>> what do you mean "Desi look it up"? I had to look it up. Why didn't you use
>> thw word, "redundant"?
>
>Standard LDB practice. Get a new word in his 'Oxford English for Foreigners'
>e-mail-of-the-day, and look up an equivalent in the Thesaurus. Now use the
>equivalent in an off-the-cuff sort of way, in the same sentence as 'Apate',
>'eisoptrophobia', and 'John Donne'. Then regale with tales of your
>'portentious' (sic) holiday on the banks of the river 'Newfound' (sic), and
>of
>how you 'LOVE [sic] Tennyson !'
>
>It's called pseudo-intellectualism. In LDB's case, not one single person
>believes that he 'knew' what 'eisoptrophobia' was before getting it in that
>word-of-the-day e-mail. No one considers for a second that he knew about
>John
>Donne before I 'dumbed down' my response to him. It is plainly obvious to
>all
>that he thought that Apate was an Italian dish similar to cannelonni.
>
>Still, it flatters his frail ego.
>
>--
>Desmond Coughlan |Yamaha YZF-R1
>desmond @ zeouane.org |'Ze Ouane!'
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!news
feed.news2me.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!
fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:07:56 +0000
>Lines: 31
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <co4esa...@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <asctoh$q7k9p$1...@ID-91468.news.dfncis.de>
><3DEA2495...@comcast.net>
><FDqG9.1439$Lk4.1...@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net>
><P7sG9.339349$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><erwG9.36$lO2....@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1038784345 27619457 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<statist...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>From: Statistics <statist...@zeouane.org>
>Date: 1 Dec 2002 12:02:26 GMT
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-b
erlin.de!uni-berlin.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Statistics <statist...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>Date: 1 Dec 2002 12:02:26 GMT
>Organization: None
>Lines: 118
>Message-ID: <asctoh$q7k9p$1...@ID-91468.news.dfncis.de>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1038744146 27513145 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
>X-Summary: Statistics
>Mail-Copies-To: never
>User-Agent: Newsgroup statistics.
>X-Comments: With thanks to "Cab" for the perl
>X-Perl-Script: http://www.zeouane.org/perl/ngstatistics.pl
>X-Abuse-Info: ab...@zeouane.org
A Planet Visitor
"Incubus" <inc...@river.styx> wrote in message news:erwG9.36$lO2....@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net...
hysteria in another post to the use of that 'word'? Think that might
have been my purpose? In fact, the reaction was even more than I
dreamed possible. desi is just soooooo easy. I even made desi
use his magic claim of it being 'pseudo-intellectual' to use a word
that is unfamiliar to him (which makes it rather easy, actually).
PV
A Planet Visitor
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> wrote in message news:co4esa...@lievre.voute.net...
> le Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:55:03 -0000, dans l'article <erwG9.36$lO2....@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net>, Incubus
<inc...@river.styx> a dit ...
>
> { snip }
>
> > up),
> >> in the construction of your sentence?
>
> > what do you mean "Desi look it up"? I had to look it up. Why didn't you use
> > thw word, "redundant"?
>
> e-mail-of-the-day, and look up an equivalent in the Thesaurus. Now use the
> equivalent in an off-the-cuff sort of way, in the same sentence as 'Apate',
> 'eisoptrophobia', and 'John Donne'. Then regale with tales of your
> 'portentious' (sic) holiday on the banks of the river 'Newfound' (sic), and of
> how you 'LOVE [sic] Tennyson !'
>
> It's called pseudo-intellectualism. In LDB's case, not one single person
> believes that he 'knew' what 'eisoptrophobia' was before getting it in that
> word-of-the-day e-mail. No one considers for a second that he knew about John
> Donne before I 'dumbed down' my response to him. It is plainly obvious to all
> that he thought that Apate was an Italian dish similar to cannelonni.
>
> Still, it flatters his frail ego.
>
gaffed and gutted. Using a 'word' unfamiliar to desi, always brings out
'pseudo-intellectual' from ol' bubblehead. Which rather limits us to
words of at most two syllables, and six letters. Actually, I used that
word purposely... which is patently obvious... and you jumped... just as
anticipated. See where it says in parentheses that I ask you to
(jump... desi... jump)? And, wow!!! did you ever jump.
Of course, the name 'John Donne' should also stick in your craw.... since
you hysterically claimed you 'knew all along' who he was... while confusing
him with 'Hemingway' LOLOLOL. You must 'LOVE' 'Hemingway.' Go
on... tell us you were only being 'ironic.' The more we know 'of you,'
desi... the more we realize that you are 'intellectually' evirate
(quick desi, look it up). ROTFLMAO.
PV
> --
> Ayatollah Desmond Coughlan |Superlunary and Most Exalted
|Spiritual Leader of the Universal
|Right to Life Church. (umm... get
|away from me -- you filthy black
|starving child in Africa) 'My church'
|isn't for you.
A Planet Visitor
"David McDonald" <David_M...@subspacemail.com> wrote in message news:0qqkuu0gm63q7rqq0...@4ax.com...
shows an inability to both understand arithmetic... and his slavish
lapping of desi's feet.
PV
A Planet Visitor
"Rev. Don Kool" <old...@comcast.net> wrote in message news:3DEA724A...@comcast.net...
>
>
> Incubus wrote:
> > "Rev. Don Kool" <old...@comcast.net> wrote...
> >>Statistics wrote:
>
> >>Poor Desi "ScriptKiddie" Coughlan, drunk again. :-(
> >
> >
> > LOL. It is obviously our lovely Desi but what i want to know is where he
> > gets some of his figures from. Perhaps he makes them up :-)
>
> "Perhaps"???????
>
(jump in anytime, desi.. ho ho ho).
PV
A Planet Visitor
> Le Sun, 01 Dec 2002 15:52:36 -0500, Rev. Don '50 Horses' Kool <old...@comcast.net> a écrit :
>
> >> How can Dolly be even 13% original? Your methodology is certainly
> >> flawed.
>
> > Duh. Desi is a script kiddie. No more, no less. He has no idea what
> > he runs, he just spews it on USENET assuming that other people are as
> > clueless and orphaned as he.
>
> either. Just like 'billytwat', and 'David'.
>
> But they're all different people. Oh yes ... absolutely. No doubt.
>
> (cue moronic riposte from 'irony-challenged' LDB, asking when I plan to
> 'apologize' (sic) for saying that they _were_ the same person ...)
>
Not much of a chance of that. You have already stated that it
is not necessary for you to apologize when you lie, since no one knows
the truth, and thus you can do so in 'good faith.'
A Planet Visitor
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> wrote in message news:1mdesa...@lievre.voute.net...
> le Sun, 01 Dec 2002 18:01:19 GMT, dans l'article <P7sG9.339349$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor
<abc...@abcxyz.com> a dit ...
>
> >> >
> >> > Poor Desi "ScriptKiddie" Coughlan, drunk again. :-(
>
> >> LOL. It is obviously our lovely Desi but what i want to know is where he
> >> gets some of his figures from. Perhaps he makes them up :-)
>
> > Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it up),
> > in the construction of your sentence?
>
>
Now very insecure in respect to your touted 'intellect,' which has been
proven to be a shipwreck. Your thinking, which you presumed to be so
profound... has been found to be as superficial as anyone could
imagine. It appears that your self-centered persona, is undergoing a
radical destruction. Commonly referred to as an 'unremitting bitch slapping.'
Incubus
I hate do break this to you my friend but knowledge of words has nothing to
do with "intelligence" psuedo or otherwise
Rev. Don Kool
Desi "Got A Subway Token?" Coughlan missed the point:
> Rev. Don Kool <old...@comcast.net> pointed out :
>
>
>>>How can Dolly be even 13% original? Your methodology is certainly
>>>flawed.
>>
>
>> Duh. Desi is a script kiddie. No more, no less. He has no idea what
>>he runs, he just spews it on USENET assuming that other people are as
>>clueless and orphaned as he.
>
>
> Translation: Desi is a script kiddie. No more, no less. He has no idea what he runs, he just spews it on USENET assuming that other people are as clueless and orphaned as he.
Rev. Don Kool
Desi "Got A Subway Token?" Coughlan wrote:
> A Planet Visitor <abc...@abcxyz.com> wrote ...
[...Desi's off-topic incoherent gibberish snipped...]
Damn, it is too funny to see how PV has utterly destroyed Desi. LOL!!
Hope this helps,
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:38:31 +0000
>
>le Mon, 02 Dec 2002 15:28:48 -0500, dans l'article
><3DEBC280...@comcast.net>, Rev. Don '50 Horses' Kool
><old...@comcast.net> a dit ...
>
>> Damn, it is too funny to see how PV has utterly destroyed Desi.
>LOL!!
>
>Yeah, get that back-slapping goin' (sic), 50 Horses !! LDB needs it ...
>
><putt-putt-putt ...>
>
>--
>Desmond Coughlan |Yamaha YZF-R1
>desmond @ zeouane.org |'Ze Ouane!'
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cide
ra!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!fu-berlin.de!u
ni-berlin.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:38:31 +0000
>Lines: 13
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <7cggsa...@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <asctoh$q7k9p$1...@ID-91468.news.dfncis.de>
><3DEA2495...@comcast.net>
><FDqG9.1439$Lk4.1...@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net>
><P7sG9.339349$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><erwG9.36$lO2....@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net>
><co4esa...@lievre.voute.net>
><1GBG9.340463$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><58fgsa...@lievre.voute.net> <3DEBC280...@comcast.net>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1038861742 28078691 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
>X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
>X-OS: BSD UNIX
>X-No-Archive: true
>Mail-Copies-To: never
>X-Obsessive-Litany: http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>X-Chats: http://www.zeouane.org/chats/
>X-PGP: http://www.zeouane.org/pgp/pubring.pkr
>X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3F1F C838 88D5 2659 B00A 6DF6 6883 FB9C E34A AC93
>User-Agent: tin/1.5.14-20020926 ("Soil") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.5-RELEASE (i386))
>
>
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 03:50:14 +0000
>
>Le Sun, 01 Dec 2002 15:52:36 -0500, Rev. Don '50 Horses' Kool
><old...@comcast.net> a écrit :
>
>>> How can Dolly be even 13% original? Your methodology is certainly
>>> flawed.
>
>> Duh. Desi is a script kiddie. No more, no less. He has no idea what
>> he runs, he just spews it on USENET assuming that other people are as
>> clueless and orphaned as he.
>
>Translation: Drewl doesn't understand how statistics are collated,
>either. Just like 'billytwat', and 'David'.
>
>But they're all different people. Oh yes ... absolutely. No doubt.
>
>(cue moronic riposte from 'irony-challenged' LDB, asking when I plan to
> 'apologize' (sic) for saying that they _were_ the same person ...)
>
>--
>Desmond Coughlan
>desmond @ zeouane.org
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!news
feed.news2me.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!
news.tu-darmstadt.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.F
R!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 03:50:14 +0000
>Organization: zeouane.org
>Lines: 21
>Message-ID: <slrnaulm3i.mp1.p...@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <asctoh$q7k9p$1...@ID-91468.news.dfncis.de>
><rookuuo5nai8dveo3...@4ax.com> <3DEA769...@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: pasdespa...@zeouane.org
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1038801193 27640426 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
>X-Orig-Path: lievre.voute.net!nobody
>X-No-Archive: true
>X-OS: BSD UNIX
>Mail-Copies-To: never
>X-Obsessive-Litany: http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>X-Chats: http://www.zeouane.org/chats/
>X-Feedback: http://www.zeouane.org/feedback.html
>X-PGP: http://www.zeouane.org/pgp/pubring.pkr
>X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3F1F C838 88D5 2659 B00A 6DF6 6883 FB9C E34A AC93
>User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (FreeBSD)
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:19:17 +0000
>
>le Mon, 02 Dec 2002 04:52:13 GMT, dans l'article <1GBG9.340463$r7.5985818=
>@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor <abc...@abcxyz.com> a dit ...=
>=20
>
>{ snip }
>
>>> Standard LDB practice. Get a new word in his 'Oxford English for Fore=
>igners'
>>> e-mail-of-the-day, and look up an equivalent in the Thesaurus. Now us=
>e the
>>> equivalent in an off-the-cuff sort of way, in the same sentence as 'Ap=
>ate',
>>> 'eisoptrophobia', and 'John Donne'. Then regale with tales of your
>>> 'portentious' (sic) holiday on the banks of the river 'Newfound' (sic)=
>, and of
>>> how you 'LOVE [sic] Tennyson !'
>>>
>>> It's called pseudo-intellectualism. In LDB's case, not one single per=
>son
>>> believes that he 'knew' what 'eisoptrophobia' was before getting it in=
> that
>>> word-of-the-day e-mail. No one considers for a second that he knew ab=
>out John
>>> Donne before I 'dumbed down' my response to him. It is plainly obviou=
>s to all
>>> that he thought that Apate was an Italian dish similar to cannelonni.
>>>
>>> Still, it flatters his frail ego.
>
>> NIBBLE... NIBBLE... NIBBLE... SNAP... got me another one.=20=20
>
>Ah, ladies and gentlemen, I believe that we have just witnessed the birth
>of a new gimmick !
>
>LDB posts utter cack in Post 1 of a thread. Incubus responds to him, and=
> I
>follow-up to Incubus. LDB immediately claims 'It was a troll and I got y=
>ou !'
>Along with the 'hermetically sealed' threads, we now see that in fact,=20
>whosoever rips LDB's arsehole a little bit, is now said to have been 'tro=
>lled'.
>
>Now, what was the last gimmick ..? Let me check The Only Archive That=20
>Counts ... hmm ... gimmick n=B0 148 was the last one, I believe: realisin=
>g
>that he can't 'proof' (sic) something that someone is alleged to have sai=
>d,
>LDB just clamps his hands over his ears and hums the Russian National Ant=
>hem,=20
>claiming that this is 'proof'. No, wait ... gimmick n=B0 149 is the use =
>of
>'ol' Bubblehead'.
>
>Right, so gimmick n=B0 150 is now born. It involves posting utter cack a=
>t the
>beginning of a thread, and then 'immunising' oneself from a spanking, by=20
>claiming that _all_ responses in that thread, constitute 'being trolled'.
>
>{ snip invocation of gimmicks n=B0 67, 56, and 34, topped off with the=20
> now customary 'Saddam Hussein Special', claim victory in the face of
> _overwhelming_ defeat }
>
>--=20
>Desmond Coughlan |Yamaha YZF-R1
>desmond @ zeouane.org |'Ze Ouane!'
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!newsfeed1.bredband.com!br
edband!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berli
n.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:19:17 +0000
>Lines: 67
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <58fgsa...@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <asctoh$q7k9p$1...@ID-91468.news.dfncis.de>
><3DEA2495...@comcast.net>
><FDqG9.1439$Lk4.1...@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net>
><P7sG9.339349$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><erwG9.36$lO2....@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net>
><co4esa...@lievre.voute.net>
><1GBG9.340463$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1038860540 28254408 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
>X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
>X-OS: BSD UNIX
>X-No-Archive: true
>Mail-Copies-To: never
>X-Obsessive-Litany: http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>X-Chats: http://www.zeouane.org/chats/
>X-PGP: http://www.zeouane.org/pgp/pubring.pkr
>X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3F1F C838 88D5 2659 B00A 6DF6 6883 FB9C E34A AC93
>User-Agent: tin/1.5.14-20020926 ("Soil") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.5-RELEASE (i386))
>
>
A Planet Visitor
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> wrote in message news:58fgsa...@lievre.voute.net...
le Mon, 02 Dec 2002 04:52:13 GMT, dans l'article <1GBG9.340463$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor
<abc...@abcxyz.com> a dit ...
{ snip }
>> Standard LDB practice. Get a new word in his 'Oxford English for Foreigners'
>> e-mail-of-the-day, and look up an equivalent in the Thesaurus. Now use the
>> equivalent in an off-the-cuff sort of way, in the same sentence as 'Apate',
>> 'eisoptrophobia', and 'John Donne'. Then regale with tales of your
>> 'portentious' (sic) holiday on the banks of the river 'Newfound' (sic), and of
>> how you 'LOVE [sic] Tennyson !'
>>
>> It's called pseudo-intellectualism. In LDB's case, not one single person
>> believes that he 'knew' what 'eisoptrophobia' was before getting it in that
>> word-of-the-day e-mail. No one considers for a second that he knew about John
>> Donne before I 'dumbed down' my response to him. It is plainly obvious to all
>> that he thought that Apate was an Italian dish similar to cannelonni.
>>
>> Still, it flatters his frail ego.
> NIBBLE... NIBBLE... NIBBLE... SNAP... got me another one.
desi says --
Ah, ladies and gentlemen, I believe that we have just witnessed the birth
of a new gimmick !
PV says --
Actually, you have taken the bait on a number of occasions... see
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=nibble+desmond+group:alt.activism.death-penalty+author:Planet&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UT
F-8&filter=0
desi says --
LDB posts utter cack in Post 1 of a thread. Incubus responds to him, and I
follow-up to Incubus. LDB immediately claims 'It was a troll and I got you !'
Along with the 'hermetically sealed' threads, we now see that in fact,
whosoever rips LDB's arsehole a little bit, is now said to have been 'trolled'.
PV says --
Isn't desi's lack of logic wonderful? Apparently the ONLY way he
can be trolled, is if one ANNOUNCES they are about to troll him.
But wouldn't that rather take away from the 'surprised look' on desi's face?
Gentle reader -- follow along now. My use of the word "pleonist," was not
in a post to desi, but to Incubus. And that word TO INCUBUS, was followed
IMMEDIATELY by my very definite expectation that dipshit, desi
WOULD bite, and oh... did he ever!! My exact words TO INCUBUS, were --
"Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it up)"
Given desi's predictable 'history' of reporting a word he is unfamiliar with
to be 'pseudo-intellectual,' GUESS what desi said? Well, he nibbled,
bit, and gobbled up my offering with EXACTLY that predictable remark.
His 'jump in' remark was "It's called pseudo-intellectualism." ROTFFLMAO!!!!
The troll succeeded beyond my wildest expectations, with EXACTLY
the word that predictably comes from desi. Just as when I drew the
word "retard," from him in a thread speaking of that very word. See
url:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7Pnm9.33633%24g73.1111996%40twister.tampabay.rr.com&oe=UTF-8
And just as we expect the predictability that is demanded of a Rolex... desi
never fails to satisfy. Now, as usual... desi would lie, cheat and steal
in a hope to deny having been trolled (actually he would do so with even
no provocation). But if this was NOT a troll in desi's view, then we can
expect that the only way he would admit that a troll was being made
toward him, would be for the sender to post "ALERT... desi, the
following is a troll!!"
And what can certainly be seen in desi's pathetic denial is that his
mother 'Becky,' is actually Apate, the mythological Greek female
personification of deceit, who has given birth to desi... a monster
who thrives on the same deceit she inflicted on mankind.
<pathetic 'mindless drivel' of desi screaming and raging at having been
caught in one of the better trolls of our day clipped>
Of course, trolling desi is an effortless task... one need only play to
his presumed 'intellect,' and he gobbles away. He CANNOT stay away
from any post which 'questions' that intellect, as when someone uses a
word that is unfamiliar to him, and he lacks the intelligence to 'look it
up.' A bloated self-adoration of his own presumed 'intellect,' makes it
child's play.
A Planet Visitor
"Incubus" <inc...@river.styx> wrote in message news:aqGG9.248$%d1.56501@newsfep2-gui...
words (which you did quite readily), and instead claim the person
using those words is being 'pseudo-intellectual,' is a clear cry for
help from desi, who lacks the 'native intelligence' required to FIND the
meaning of those words, by simply opening a dictionary to the
page containing that word. Choosing instead to otiosely (quick, desi...
look it up) spend his time providing insulting remarks. Time which could
be better spent increasing his vocabulary. Which is the weakest part
of desi's grasp of the English language - a weakness which he seems
to feel quite proud of - proclaiming that the words in that language
must remain static, and cannot become richer and fuller. [1] This is
probably related to the French feeling the same about their language,
and needing to hold a committee and pass a 'language law,' whenever
a 'new word' enters that language. French, in a few hundred years,
will go the way of Latin, if they continue that 'parody of intellect.'
Language expands with USAGE... not with any 'committee act.'
All verbal skills are overemphasized in the determination of native intelligence,
as reported in most recent studies. A study, reported in the Journal
of Experimental Psychology, see
http://www.apa.org/journals/xge/press_releases/december_2001/xge1304621.html
demonstrated that visuospatial skills - Those involve putting together
pieces of visual information and being able to manipulate them mentally
are central to 'intelligence.' And found 'verbal skills,' are a much lesser
determinate of native intelligence. But there is no doubt that a rich
vocabulary, provides a framework to better express ideas and concepts
in COMMUNICATION to others. You notice I say 'vocabulary,' which
adds a 'higher dimension' to the meaning of our thoughts. A subtle
precision to the words we use, which should not be limited to those
of only two syllables and six letters. The fact is that grammar and
pedantic demands for punctuation perfection, are of lesser importance
to communication, if the meaning is still clear.
Now -- My use of that particular word was purposely designed to elicit
the exact response from desi that occurred. I could not have asked
for a more perfect result. Notice that I implore desi to provide his
famous 'pseudo-intellectual' remark, demonstrating his inability
to research the meaning of words, and his fright at seeing them
used. My exact words to YOU were --
"Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it up)"
Can you see how this was 'bait,' to desi... and not to you? YOU
had the 'intelligence' to look it up, if it was unfamiliar to you (I made
it such PURPOSELY)... looking for a synonym that meant 'redundant,'
but was not in such common usage... effectively casting that bait
to DESI... not you, by tell desi to 'look it up.' His ego-driven,
self-adoring persona could NOT resist calling it 'pseudo-intellectual.'
Which was EXACTLY what I was looking for FROM HIM. In his
remark to my comment to YOU -- he writes ""It's called
pseudo-intellectualism." Tell me how I could have better driven
him to the point of mental despair? It was not possible for him
to stay away... and yet he knew that not staying away would
provide me an opportunity to demonstrate he is a fool.
PV
[1] ALERT... desi, the following is a troll!!! ..
Incubus
I know the meaning of the word "intelligence" PV my friend. Though if i had
my way I would add a new entry to the dictionary which would read something
like...
Intelligence: Noun. Something that most people on usenet beleive thay have
more of than anyone else
>Choosing instead to otiosely (quick, desi...
> look it up) spend his time providing insulting remarks. Time which could
> be better spent increasing his vocabulary. Which is the weakest part
> of desi's grasp of the English language - a weakness which he seems
> to feel quite proud of - proclaiming that the words in that language
> must remain static, and cannot become richer and fuller. [1] This is
> probably related to the French feeling the same about their language,
> and needing to hold a committee and pass a 'language law,' whenever
> a 'new word' enters that language. French, in a few hundred years,
> will go the way of Latin, if they continue that 'parody of intellect.'
> Language expands with USAGE... not with any 'committee act.'
I like Latin. It is a pity it is obsolete.
>
> All verbal skills are overemphasized in the determination of native
intelligence,
> as reported in most recent studies.
I agree. Like I said, " knowledge of words has nothing to do with
"intelligence" psuedo or otherwise". It is sad that people use command of
langauge to meaasure it. Some sad people even use taste in films, music,
arts and culture etc etc to measure intelligence. I was once accused of
being a moron because i enjoyed "predator 2" by some academic pratt who
consider a film watchable only if it was directed by quentin tarentino or it
was French with English subtitles. I dared him to watch "angels with dirty
faces" with james cagney. He didn't. "but it is a crime thriller, i thought
you liked them" I argued. He went into ecstatic heaven when he saw "seven"
but refuesd to watch the "Dr Phibes" films... erm yes
A study, reported in the Journal
> of Experimental Psychology, see
>
http://www.apa.org/journals/xge/press_releases/december_2001/xge1304621.html
> demonstrated that visuospatial skills - Those involve putting together
> pieces of visual information and being able to manipulate them mentally
> are central to 'intelligence.' And found 'verbal skills,' are a much
lesser
> determinate of native intelligence. But there is no doubt that a rich
> vocabulary, provides a framework to better express ideas and concepts
> in COMMUNICATION to others.
Communication. Yes It is a central network which to few people know how to
do effectively, particularly in business. Do you know the game, "Chinese
whispers"? I think who ever created that had a point. There are many
sections of the human psych that compose intelligence but you don't have to
excell in all of them to be ragarded as intelligent
>You notice I say 'vocabulary,' which
> adds a 'higher dimension' to the meaning of our thoughts.
I am not so sure.
>A subtle
> precision to the words we use, which should not be limited to those
> of only two syllables and six letters. The fact is that grammar and
> pedantic demands for punctuation perfection, are of lesser importance
> to communication, if the meaning is still clear.
exactly
>
> Now -- My use of that particular word was purposely designed to elicit
> the exact response from desi that occurred. I could not have asked
> for a more perfect result.
Too good. You got a response from me as well :-)
>Notice that I implore desi to provide his
> famous 'pseudo-intellectual' remark, demonstrating his inability
> to research the meaning of words, and his fright at seeing them
> used. My exact words to YOU were --
>
> "Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it
up)"
>
> Can you see how this was 'bait,' to desi... and not to you? YOU
> had the 'intelligence' to look it up, if it was unfamiliar to you (I made
> it such PURPOSELY)... looking for a synonym that meant 'redundant,'
> but was not in such common usage... effectively casting that bait
> to DESI... not you, by tell desi to 'look it up.' His ego-driven,
> self-adoring persona could NOT resist calling it 'pseudo-intellectual.'
> Which was EXACTLY what I was looking for FROM HIM. In his
> remark to my comment to YOU -- he writes ""It's called
> pseudo-intellectualism." Tell me how I could have better driven
> him to the point of mental despair? It was not possible for him
> to stay away... and yet he knew that not staying away would
> provide me an opportunity to demonstrate he is a fool.
Then I humbly apologise PV (something else Desi never does :-) ). I over
reacted. I do when i see some academic clown trying to use big words or
references (as you probably noticed with whatsisname who kept calling
people "darwinists" ) to make himself appear "intelligent"
This is where you say, "it's OK inc. I forgive you"
:-)
dirtdog
<abc...@abcxyz.com> wrote:
<snip>
>desi says --
<sip>
>PV says --
<snip>
>desi says --
<snip>
>PV says --
In much the same way as PV chooses to 'make up his own versions' of
rules on English grammar, spelling and (most commonly) punctuation, he
now appears to have disregarded traditional methods of attribution.
<snip>
w00f
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:56:40 +0000
>
>le Tue, 03 Dec 2002 05:14:20 GMT, dans l'article <M4XG9.342456$r7.6149608=
>@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor <abc...@abcxyz.com> a dit ...=
>=20
>
>>>> Standard LDB practice. Get a new word in his 'Oxford English for For=
>eigners'
>>>> e-mail-of-the-day, and look up an equivalent in the Thesaurus. Now u=
>se the
>>>> equivalent in an off-the-cuff sort of way, in the same sentence as 'A=
>pate',
>>>> 'eisoptrophobia', and 'John Donne'. Then regale with tales of your
>>>> 'portentious' (sic) holiday on the banks of the river 'Newfound' (sic=
>), and of
>>>> how you 'LOVE [sic] Tennyson !'
>>>>
>>>> It's called pseudo-intellectualism. In LDB's case, not one single pe=
>rson
>>>> believes that he 'knew' what 'eisoptrophobia' was before getting it i=
>n that
>>>> word-of-the-day e-mail. No one considers for a second that he knew a=
>bout John
>>>> Donne before I 'dumbed down' my response to him. It is plainly obvio=
>us to all
>>>> that he thought that Apate was an Italian dish similar to cannelonni.
>>>>
>>>> Still, it flatters his frail ego.
>
>>> NIBBLE... NIBBLE... NIBBLE... SNAP... got me another one.
>
>{ clean up newbie fuckwit LDB's attributions }
>
>>> Ah, ladies and gentlemen, I believe that we have just witnessed the
>>> birth of a new gimmick !
>
>> Actually, you have taken the bait on a number of occasions... see
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=3Dnibble+desmond+group:alt.activism.d=
>eath-penalty+author:Planet&hl=3Den&lr=3D&ie=3DUTF-8&oe=3DUT
>> F-8&filter=3D0
>
>Thanks for the URL. Did you open it ? I didn't. I imagine that it's a=20
>'litany' (ho, ho, ho ...) of occasions when you've invoked gimmick n=B0 1=
>50.
>
>>> LDB posts utter cack in Post 1 of a thread. Incubus responds to him,
>>> and I follow-up to Incubus. LDB immediately claims 'It was a troll an=
>d
>>> I got you !' Along with the 'hermetically sealed' threads, we now see
>>> that in fact, whosoever rips LDB's arsehole a little bit, is now said =
>to
>>> have been 'trolled'.
>
>> Isn't desi's lack of logic wonderful? Apparently the ONLY way he can b=
>e
>> trolled, is if one ANNOUNCES they are about to troll him. But wouldn't
>> that rather take away from the 'surprised look' on desi's face? Gentle
>> reader -- follow along now. My use of the word "pleonist," was not in =
>a
>> post to desi, but to Incubus. And that word TO INCUBUS, was followed
>> IMMEDIATELY by my very definite expectation that dipshit, desi WOULD
>> bite, and oh... did he ever!! My exact words TO INCUBUS, were --
>>=20
>> "Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it
>> up)"
>
>Regrettably, I did not answer your post, but incubus's. Now, this is a
>textbook implementation of gimmick n=B0 150. You post some infantile cac=
>k
>(as is your wont), and include 'watch X answer ...'. Of course, 'X'
>doesn't respond to your troll but one, two, three (or more) posts further
>down the thread, he responds to someone else. 'SNAP!' (sic), LDB jumps
>in and claims 'victory' under gimmick n=B0 150.
>
>In fact, gimmick n=B0 150 is almost like gimmick n=B0 147, and perhaps ha=
>s
>shades of gimmick n=B0 2, but in a more 'oblique' manner.=20=20
>
>Gimmick n=B0 147 involves posting a load of infantile, moronic gobshite, =
>and then
>'anticipating' the response, in order to _dissuade_ that response. It's =
>a
>'no-lose' gamble, as if the 'opponent' doesn't respond, you can invoke 14=
>7[a],
>and claim 'Not got an answer for that ?'. Or if he does respond, you can
>invoke 147[b] and claim, 'See ? I knew he'd answer !'
>
>The latter option also has built-in 'spank protection' as standard, so th=
>at
>when your opponent delivers a _second_ thrashing to your sorry 'ass' (sic=
>), you
>can claim that you 'set him up', to answer in a particular way.
>
>Gimmick n=B0 147 is often invoked in conjunction with gimmick n=B0 135, c=
>laim that
>some other Scum had 'bitch-slapped' (sic) me. This was happening so ofte=
>n,
>that n=B0 147 and n=B0 135 came to be known as the 'binary system'. Both=
> a
>'mirror-image' of the other. Both as ineffective. Both leaving the user=
> open
>to as much ridicule.
>
>Gimmick n=B0 2 involves posting utter rubbish, and then claiming that it =
>was
>'just a troll', when the Light-Dwellers tear you a new 'asshole' (sic).
>
>When all's said and done, however, we can see that all you have left are
>your gimmicks ... sorry, 'gimmick's' (sic). Beaten, thrashed, humiliated
>by even your 'own side', considered a 'non-entity' by the only
>retentionist, and responsible for driving away Rennie, as well as the two
>newbies whose presence we noted only a week or so ago. A sad, tired,
>lonely old man, whose only 'pleasure' in life is jerking his head around
>and exploding in his 'Tourette [sic] Syndrome' cries of 'lie !'
>
>We pity you.
>
>{ snip remainder of frankly nonsensical gibbering }
>
>--=20
>Desmond Coughlan |Yamaha YZF-R1
>desmond @ zeouane.org |'Ze Ouane!'
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news
feed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berl
in.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:56:40 +0000
>Lines: 122
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <o7kisa...@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <asctoh$q7k9p$1...@ID-91468.news.dfncis.de>
><3DEA2495...@comcast.net>
><FDqG9.1439$Lk4.1...@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net>
><P7sG9.339349$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><erwG9.36$lO2....@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net>
><co4esa...@lievre.voute.net>
><1GBG9.340463$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><58fgsa...@lievre.voute.net>
><M4XG9.342456$r7.61...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1038931333 28053700 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
A Planet Visitor
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> wrote in message news:o7kisa...@lievre.voute.net...
le Tue, 03 Dec 2002 05:14:20 GMT, dans l'article <M4XG9.342456$r7.61...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor
<abc...@abcxyz.com> a dit ...
desi said -
>>> Standard LDB practice. Get a new word in his 'Oxford English for Foreigners'
>>> e-mail-of-the-day, and look up an equivalent in the Thesaurus. Now use the
>>> equivalent in an off-the-cuff sort of way, in the same sentence as 'Apate',
>>> 'eisoptrophobia', and 'John Donne'. Then regale with tales of your
>>> 'portentious' (sic) holiday on the banks of the river 'Newfound' (sic), and of
>>> how you 'LOVE [sic] Tennyson !'
>>>
>>> It's called pseudo-intellectualism. In LDB's case, not one single person
>>> believes that he 'knew' what 'eisoptrophobia' was before getting it in that
>>> word-of-the-day e-mail. No one considers for a second that he knew about John
>>> Donne before I 'dumbed down' my response to him. It is plainly obvious to all
>>> that he thought that Apate was an Italian dish similar to cannelonni.
>>>
>>> Still, it flatters his frail ego.
PV says --
For you to claim that I did not KNOW of John Donne, before YOU fucked
up the quote, is absurd. Had I NOT known of John Donne, I would NOT
have been able to CORRECT YOUR IGNORANCE, because YOU claimed
the quote came from 'Hemingway.' Once again, your logic is totally and
absolutely flawed.
PV said --
>> NIBBLE... NIBBLE... NIBBLE... SNAP... got me another one.
desi says --
{ clean up newbie fuckwit LDB's attributions }
PV says --
TRANSLATION -- "switch the evidence, boys.... I need to take flight from
the last possibility of demonstrating my inability to not make a fool of
myself when I 'jump at all bait' which laughs at my presumed intellect."
desi says --
>> Ah, ladies and gentlemen, I believe that we have just witnessed the
>> birth of a new gimmick !
PV says --
> Actually, you have taken the bait on a number of occasions... see
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=nibble+desmond+group:alt.activism.death-penalty+author:Planet&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UT
> F-8&filter=0
desi says --
Thanks for the URL. Did you open it ? I didn't. I imagine that it's a
'litany' (ho, ho, ho ...) of occasions when you've invoked gimmick n° 150.
PV says --
LOL... how very 'desi typical.' Admits he has not 'looked at it,' but has
already decided what it contains. Need I mention -- hypocrite??? And
'it' contains a great number of occasions where you have been trolled
for exactly the same reason as here, with 'pleonist.' Any post which
casts doubt on your 'presumed intellect' will cause you to nibble
furiously. It's just part of your uncontrollable persona, desi. Your
ego-driven, self-centered belief in your own 'intellectual' superiority,
which is so simple for me to shatter into a million shards at my will.
The 'gift' of intellect you presume was given to you, is no more. It has
become no more than that Cajun Voodoo and mysterious swamp fever
dissolved in the sugars of the Bozo Bajou of your twisted little mind.
Vanished... tone and tints. It has been revealed in the blink of an
eye...in the subtle framing of a few words meant to draw you out... that
you are 'intellectual deprived.' Clear, unambiguous and convincing
proof of that limitation. Not exactly a 'secret of the universe,' now
newly discovered, but the revelation... the axiomatic (quick, desi... look
it up ho ho ho) manifestation of what was previously not only suspected,
but presumed as a logical conclusion by rational minds.
desi says --
>> LDB posts utter cack in Post 1 of a thread. Incubus responds to him,
>> and I follow-up to Incubus. LDB immediately claims 'It was a troll and
>> I got you !' Along with the 'hermetically sealed' threads, we now see
>> that in fact, whosoever rips LDB's arsehole a little bit, is now said to
>> have been 'trolled'.
PV says --
> Isn't desi's lack of logic wonderful? Apparently the ONLY way he can be
> trolled, is if one ANNOUNCES they are about to troll him. But wouldn't
> that rather take away from the 'surprised look' on desi's face? Gentle
> reader -- follow along now. My use of the word "pleonist," was not in a
> post to desi, but to Incubus. And that word TO INCUBUS, was followed
> IMMEDIATELY by my very definite expectation that dipshit, desi WOULD
> bite, and oh... did he ever!! My exact words TO INCUBUS, were --
>
> "Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it
> up)"
desi says --
Regrettably, I did not answer your post, but incubus's. Now, this is a
textbook implementation of gimmick n° 150. You post some infantile cack
(as is your wont), and include 'watch X answer ...'. Of course, 'X'
doesn't respond to your troll but one, two, three (or more) posts further
down the thread, he responds to someone else. 'SNAP!' (sic), LDB jumps
in and claims 'victory' under gimmick n° 150.
PV says --
Your post to incubus was 'actually' a response to my post to him.
Clearly, from the FIRST WORDS in your post to him, which were
"Standard LDB practice."
The very first fucking words!!! Followed by a litany of 'presumed
mistakes' I have made, with these words that followed --
"Get a new word in his 'Oxford English for Foreigners' e-mail-of-the-day,
and look up an equivalent in the Thesaurus. Now use the equivalent
in an off-the-cuff sort of way, in the same sentence as 'Apate',
'eisoptrophobia', and 'John Donne'. Then regale with tales of your
'portentious' (sic) holiday on the banks of the river 'Newfound' (sic), and of
how you 'LOVE [sic] Tennyson !'
Looking at every example you provide we find -- 'Apate'
(your intellectual ignorance, actually)... 'eisoptrophobia' (your
intellectual ignorance, actually)... 'John Donne' (your intellectual
ignorance, actually), 'portentious' (your intellectual ignorance,
actually), 'Newfound' (sic) (yeah.... BFD, I neglected to add 'land'
what a 'great' pedantic victory for you), and 'I LOVE Tennyson !' (your
intellectual ignorance, actually... perhaps shaded a bit by your
latent homophobia). In every case... it was YOUR intellectual
ignorance demonstrating that you did not even KNOW of those
terms or those individuals, until I brought some brief glimpse of
intellectual life into your useless, wasted, empty, comic-book
existence here.
desi says --
In fact, gimmick n° 150 is almost like gimmick n° 147, and perhaps has
shades of gimmick n° 2, but in a more 'oblique' manner.
Gimmick n° 147 involves posting a load of infantile, moronic gobshite, and then
'anticipating' the response, in order to _dissuade_ that response. It's a
'no-lose' gamble, as if the 'opponent' doesn't respond, you can invoke 147[a],
and claim 'Not got an answer for that ?'. Or if he does respond, you can
invoke 147[b] and claim, 'See ? I knew he'd answer !'
PV says --
What we have here is simply a further demonstration that you lack
the capacity to provide 'articulate' and 'intellectual' commentary and
again revert to the only thing you are familiar with... the lowest common
denominator of 'intelligence' --- insults, clearly recognized as just
more of your 'mindless drivel.'
desi says --
The latter option also has built-in 'spank protection' as standard, so that
when your opponent delivers a _second_ thrashing to your sorry 'ass' (sic), you
can claim that you 'set him up', to answer in a particular way.
PV says --
There is no doubt you were 'set up,' desi. In a post to incubus, I TAUNT
you with the clear challenge to 'make a fool of yourself, desi.' And you
DID. My comment to incubus when he had used the word 'perhaps,' was
AGAIN --
""Perhaps???? Isn't that word rather pleonastic (quick, desi -- look it up)"
There is no doubt that was taunting you to claim I was 'pseudo-intellectual,'
and what happened? Why, you claimed EXACTLY that I was
'pseudo-intellectual.' There could not have been a more certain troll, than
that. And you are obviously furious about having been trolled, and will
ramble through a bunch of 'mindless drivel,' expecting others to believe
you were not trolled, when it is so obvious that I do it with such ease.
The 'secret' to trolling you... is to question your 'intellect,' it brings out
the certain response from you that you lack such intellect, and are very
'sensitive' about that lack. It's like sticking a pin in you. And here you
would try to convince others that you did not yell 'ouch,' in your
post to incubus.
desi says --
Gimmick n° 147 is often invoked in conjunction with gimmick n° 135, claim that
some other Scum had 'bitch-slapped' (sic) me. This was happening so often,
that n° 147 and n° 135 came to be known as the 'binary system'. Both a
'mirror-image' of the other. Both as ineffective. Both leaving the user open
to as much ridicule.
Gimmick n° 2 involves posting utter rubbish, and then claiming that it was
'just a troll', when the Light-Dwellers tear you a new 'asshole' (sic).
When all's said and done, however, we can see that all you have left are
your gimmicks ... sorry, 'gimmick's' (sic). Beaten, thrashed, humiliated
by even your 'own side', considered a 'non-entity' by the only
retentionist, and responsible for driving away Rennie, as well as the two
newbies whose presence we noted only a week or so ago. A sad, tired,
lonely old man, whose only 'pleasure' in life is jerking his head around
and exploding in his 'Tourette [sic] Syndrome' cries of 'lie !'
PV Says --
I believe you referred to it as 'Torett's syndrome,' while admitting
that you did not have the 'intellectual expertise' to find the correct
name. So it's heartening to see that you've finally learned the
proper name of that syndrome, now that I've explained it to you... see
url:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Gg1E9.205091%24fa.4437982%40twister.tampabay.rr.com&oe=UTF-8
There is no doubt that certain manifestations of that afliction, appear to
be consistence with the rambling, incoherent, and obscene words, in
your comment.
desi says --
We pity you.
PV says --
Save your pity for your intellectual ignorance, my boy. Hysterical raving
will not extract you from this one. Better that you demonstrate profound
silence here, while throwing your shoe against the wall in frustration,
in your 'real life.' Because, desi, babe... you were trolled... suck it up...
and forget about all the hysterical denials. It has been 'revealed.'
Your 'intelligence,' always seen as shallow.. is now shown to be a 'dry
well.' Your butt has been spank... spank... spanked thoroughly. I
'trolled' you with (quick, desi... look it up), in a post to incubus... and
you bit furiously. As you will certainly do the next time I use a word
that is 'strange to you.'
{ snip remainder of frankly nonsensical gibbering }
Too late, desi. Everyone already knows that you show YOURSELF
to be 'pseudo-intellectual' when you presume that someone is
'pseudo-intellectual' if they use a word or a term, that you yourself
are unfamiliar with. It rather shows your inability to use 'native
intelligence' to 'look up the word,' or 'research the reference.'
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:21:51 +0000
>
>le Wed, 04 Dec 2002 04:03:59 GMT, dans l'article <P8fH9.348208$r7.6306470=
>@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor <abc...@abcxyz.com> a dit ...=
>=20
>
>{ snip LDB's various implementations of gimmick 147[b], all of it
> hopelessly formatted }
>
>>> When all's said and done, however, we can see that all you have left a=
>re
>>> your gimmicks ... sorry, 'gimmick's' (sic). Beaten, thrashed, humilia=
>ted
>>> by even your 'own side', considered a 'non-entity' by the only
>>> retentionist, and responsible for driving away Rennie, as well as the =
>two
>>> newbies whose presence we noted only a week or so ago. A sad, tired,
>>> lonely old man, whose only 'pleasure' in life is jerking his head arou=
>nd
>>> and exploding in his 'Tourette [sic] Syndrome' cries of 'lie !'
>
>> I believe you referred to it as 'Torett's syndrome,' while admitting th=
>at
>> you did not have the 'intellectual expertise' to find the correct name.=
>=20=20
>
>I did indeed refer to it as 'Torett's Syndrome', but once again, you slip=
> a
>lie into the text, hoping that no one will notice. My exact words were .=
>..
>
> 'news:alt.activism.death-penalty has long ago realised that you're a
> closet sufferer of Torett's Syndrome [1]'
>
>... with the footnote being ...=20
>
> '[1] or "Torett [sic] Syndrome", as you'd call it'
>
>When you corrected me, I replied ...=20
>
> 'Well that's a point for you, LDB. I couldn't remember how to spell
> the syndrome, and so had to do a "fuzzy logic" search for it. I found
> "Torett", but you're right: it's Tourette's.'
>
>Ho, ho, ho ... we can all sense your frustration that you're not able to
>claim 'intellectual superiority', as I acknowledged my error immediately.
>Oops, you're doing so, anyway. Oh well ... no one ever accused you of
>being principled (or 'honest', or 'bright', or 'pleasant', or ...).
>
>{ snip remainder of various invocations of gimmick n=B0 147, gimmick n=B0=
> 2,
> gimmick n=B0 150, and gimmick n=B0 68 }
>
>--=20
>Desmond Coughlan |Yamaha YZF-R1
>desmond @ zeouane.org |'Ze Ouane!'
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!newsfeed1.bredband.com!br
edband!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berli
n.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:21:51 +0000
>Lines: 56
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <v0sksa....@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <asctoh$q7k9p$1...@ID-91468.news.dfncis.de>
><3DEA2495...@comcast.net>
><FDqG9.1439$Lk4.1...@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net>
><P7sG9.339349$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><erwG9.36$lO2....@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net>
><co4esa...@lievre.voute.net>
><1GBG9.340463$r7.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><58fgsa...@lievre.voute.net>
><M4XG9.342456$r7.61...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><o7kisa...@lievre.voute.net>
><P8fH9.348208$r7.63...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1039004828 29429971 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
A Planet Visitor
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> wrote in message news:v0sksa....@lievre.voute.net...
le Wed, 04 Dec 2002 04:03:59 GMT, dans l'article <P8fH9.348208$r7.63...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor
<abc...@abcxyz.com> a dit ...
{ snip LDB's various implementations of gimmick 147[b], all of it
hopelessly formatted }
>> When all's said and done, however, we can see that all you have left are
>> your gimmicks ... sorry, 'gimmick's' (sic). Beaten, thrashed, humiliated
>> by even your 'own side', considered a 'non-entity' by the only
>> retentionist, and responsible for driving away Rennie, as well as the two
>> newbies whose presence we noted only a week or so ago. A sad, tired,
>> lonely old man, whose only 'pleasure' in life is jerking his head around
>> and exploding in his 'Tourette [sic] Syndrome' cries of 'lie !'
> I believe you referred to it as 'Torett's syndrome,' while admitting that
> you did not have the 'intellectual expertise' to find the correct name.
I did indeed refer to it as 'Torett's Syndrome', but once again, you slip a
lie into the text, hoping that no one will notice. My exact words were ...
'news:alt.activism.death-penalty has long ago realised that you're a
closet sufferer of Torett's Syndrome [1]'
... with the footnote being ...
'[1] or "Torett [sic] Syndrome", as you'd call it'
When you corrected me, I replied ...
'Well that's a point for you, LDB. I couldn't remember how to spell
the syndrome, and so had to do a "fuzzy logic" search for it. I found
"Torett", but you're right: it's Tourette's.'
In other words -- you are too lazy to look it up. Which says a lot
about you refering to every instance of a word unfamilar to you
as a demonstration of 'pseudo-intellectual.' It appears you are
just lazy.
Ho, ho, ho ... we can all sense your frustration that you're not able to
claim 'intellectual superiority', as I acknowledged my error immediately.
Oops, you're doing so, anyway. Oh well ... no one ever accused you of
being principled (or 'honest', or 'bright', or 'pleasant', or ...).
Claiming 'intellectual superiority' over you, is no big deal. It's
done here every day, by a great number of posters. In fact,
not since joe1orbit has your lack of 'intellect' been challenged.
Although hi1k has done some magnificent work in attempting
to meet the challenge of a 'lack of intellect.' You're just in a
classless of your own.
{ snip remainder of various invocations of gimmick n° 147, gimmick n° 2,
gimmick n° 150, and gimmick n° 68 }
blah, blah, blah, blah... But your comment makes no sense,
desi... you need another blah.
PV
Torett's (sic) syndrome... ho ho ho. You intellectually deprived
fruitcake.
Statistics
NGStatistics: Newsgroup Statistics Program
Version 1.1 (using News::Scan)
Copyright (C) 2002 'Cab',
Based on groupstat, Copyleft (C) 2000 H. Alex LaHurreau
Based on StatNews, Copyleft (C) 1998 Davide G. M. Salvetti
Newsgroup.................: alt.activism.death-penalty
Stats Were Taken..........: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 11:47:01 GMT
Stats Begin...............: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:52:15 GMT
Stats End.................: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 07:59:39 GMT
Days......................: 7
Total No. of Articles.....: 1341
Total No. of Characters...: 4103575
Total Volume..............: 4007
Messages Per Day..........: 191.6
Characters Per Day........: 586225.0
Average Daily Volume......: 572 kB
Total Posters This Week...: 60
Messages with Sigs........: 24.76%
Original Content Rating...: 40.49%
Top 10 Prolific Posters: Posts / Posts per Day / Percent Share
==============================================================
1. Desmond Coughlan..................................: 228 32.6 17.0%
2. Dr. Dolly Coughlan................................: 223 31.9 16.6%
3. A Planet Visitor..................................: 190 27.1 14.2%
4. Rev. Don Kool.....................................: 134 19.1 10.0%
5. Incubus...........................................: 96 13.7 7.2%
6. Jigsaw1695........................................: 72 10.3 5.4%
7. richj7............................................: 50 7.1 3.7%
8. Mr Q. Z. Diablo...................................: 45 6.4 3.4%
9. Ikke..............................................: 30 4.3 2.2%
10. Dirtdog...........................................: 29 4.1 2.2%
Top 10 Bandwidth-Slurping Posters: kBytes / kBytes per Day / Percent Share
==========================================================================
1. A Planet Visitor..................................: 845 120.8 21.1%
2. Dr. Dolly Coughlan................................: 840 120.1 21.0%
3. Desmond Coughlan..................................: 565 80.8 14.1%
4. Rev. Don Kool.....................................: 309 44.3 7.7%
5. Incubus...........................................: 209 29.9 5.2%
6. Ikke..............................................: 153 21.9 3.8%
7. Jigsaw1695........................................: 140 20.0 3.5%
8. richj7............................................: 135 19.3 3.4%
9. Mr Q. Z. Diablo...................................: 95 13.6 2.4%
10. JüRgen............................................: 66 9.6 1.7%
Top 10 Popular Threads: Posts / Posts per Day / Percent Share
=============================================================
1. Supreme Court Could End Miranda Warnings..........: 115 16.4 8.6%
2. It is Starting Again..............................: 96 13.7 7.2%
3. Hey Jurgen........................................: 90 12.9 6.7%
4. Donnie is a literate chap, is he not?.............: 80 11.4 6.0%
5. The Truth about Desi's Motorcycle.................: 76 10.9 5.7%
6. Prior Metro Experience............................: 55 7.9 4.1%
7. Armed Pilots Save Lives...........................: 53 7.6 4.0%
8. More on the Concord...............................: 50 7.1 3.7%
9. Rojas Executed....................................: 47 6.7 3.5%
10. Ain't No First Amendment in France................: 45 6.4 3.4%
Top 10 Bandwidth-Slurping Threads: kBytes / kBytes per Day / Percent Share
==========================================================================
1. Hey Jurgen........................................: 430 61.5 10.7%
2. Supreme Court Could End Miranda Warnings..........: 386 55.2 9.6%
3. It is Starting Again..............................: 373 53.4 9.3%
4. Donnie is a literate chap, is he not?.............: 234 33.6 5.9%
5. The Truth about Desi's Motorcycle.................: 187 26.8 4.7%
6. alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics......: 151 21.7 3.8%
7. 'THE DEATH FOR RAPE DILEMMA'......................: 150 21.5 3.7%
8. Prior Metro Experience............................: 142 20.4 3.6%
9. Armed Pilots Save Lives...........................: 127 18.1 3.2%
10. You have unalienable rights.......................: 120 17.2 3.0%
Top 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (All Bytes)
===============================================================
1. Earl Evleth...............................................: 89.3%
2. Jigsaw1695................................................: 72.5%
3. Cerberus..................................................: 69.7%
4. patton....................................................: 66.9%
5. Dr. Jai Maharaj...........................................: 64.2%
6. Gregoriy Raspoutine.......................................: 61.1%
7. Mr Q. Z. Diablo...........................................: 59.2%
8. Kwag7693..................................................: 57.9%
9. A Planet Visitor..........................................: 57.6%
10. Desmond Coughlan..........................................: 55.7%
Bottom 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (All Bytes)
==================================================================
1. Dr. Dolly Coughlan........................................: 12.3%
2. David McDonald............................................: 23.8%
3. Ikke......................................................: 27.6%
4. Incubus...................................................: 30.6%
5. richj7....................................................: 31.3%
6. William Robert............................................: 38.0%
7. Rev. Don Kool.............................................: 43.4%
8. Donna Evleth..............................................: 44.0%
9. Hugh Neary................................................: 45.2%
10. dirtdogFUCKOFF............................................: 48.5%
Top 10 Crossposting Groups: Posts in Group
==========================================
1. soc.culture.indian...........................................: 31
2. soc.women....................................................: 31
3. alt.fan.jai-maharaj..........................................: 30
4. soc.men......................................................: 28
5. alt.activism.................................................: 16
6. alt.politics.................................................: 16
7. talk.politics................................................: 16
8. talk.politics.misc...........................................: 16
9. england.chat.................................................: 3
10. soc.culture.usa..............................................: 3
David McDonald
<statist...@zeouane.org> wrote:
[snip]
Deswaldo's meaningless numbers removed!
Poor Deswaldo "ScriptKiddie" Coughlan, drunk again. :-(
David
Earl Evleth
statist...@zeouane.org a écrit le 8/12/02 13:01 :
> Top 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (All Bytes)
> ===============================================================
> 1. Earl Evleth...............................................: 89.3%
Thank you for the statistics.
You should try harder PV, more originality, less blather.
Earl
Rev. Don Kool
It seems that he's destined to follow the family tradition. :-( Let's
just hope he doesn't get so drunk that he stumbles out into the street
and becomes road pizza like his sister Liz.
David McDonald
<old...@comcast.net> wrote:
>David McDonald wrote:
>> On 8 Dec 2002 12:01:44 GMT, Deswaldo the LIAR Coughlan
>> <statist...@zeouane.org> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Deswaldo's meaningless numbers removed!
>>
>> Poor Deswaldo "ScriptKiddie" Coughlan, drunk again. :-(
>
> It seems that he's destined to follow the family tradition. :-( Let's
>just hope he doesn't get so drunk that he stumbles out into the street
>and becomes road pizza like his sister Liz.
This sort of thing just feeds the nature/nurture controversy.
David
>
> Hope this helps,
> Don
A Planet Visitor
"Earl Evleth" <evl...@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:BA1928FA.44C7%evl...@wanadoo.fr...
'originality,' is showing again. If the 'original content'
statistic eliminated the posting of articles from other sources,
and actually represented YOUR words, you would certainly
never even show up in that particular category. Try it... go
a week without ONCE posting a lengthy article, and see.
Just today, In two out of three of your posts, I see a
very lengthy clip of 'Rape convict released after 2 DNA
tests,' and another of 'Finale for a strange Sopranos season.'
Both would show up as 'original content,' since you began
those two threads. But they hardly represent anything
'original' from your mind.
I have probably put more 'originality' in this very post, than
you generally do in a week. And were anyone to post every
article they saw that seemed 'interesting to them,' as you
do, it is obvious they would be at the 'top of the list.' The list
is, in fact, worthless. I posted an 'original' comment yesterday,
of the 'apology of Saddam,' and I did not fill the group, as
you usually do, with the entire article, but simply provided
NO comment whatsoever, except a link to the article.
Of course, some time ago you did come up with an 'original
comment'.... I believe it was when you referred to a "black
mama riding up in her Caddy" to collect her welfare check.
If that's your idea of 'original,' I want no part of it.
PV
Earl Evleth
Visitor à abc...@abcxyz.com a écrit le 8/12/02 19:35 :
>>> Top 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (All Bytes)
>>> ===============================================================
>>> 1. Earl Evleth...............................................: 89.3%
>>
I repeat, I did not give myself this grade others did.
So I got an "A" for effort, and PV got an "F".
Not my fault.
I cut your blather. In fact, being blather I did not read it.
Did anybody? Speak up.
Earl
A Planet Visitor
"Earl Evleth" <evl...@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:BA196FFB.472F%evl...@wanadoo.fr...
> dans l'article 8iMI9.458081$S8.92...@twister.tampabay.rr.com, A Planet
> Visitor à abc...@abcxyz.com a écrit le 8/12/02 19:35 :
>
>
> >>> Top 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (All Bytes)
> >>> ===============================================================
> >>> 1. Earl Evleth...............................................: 89.3%
> >>
>
>
> I repeat, I did not give myself this grade others did.
>
> So I got an "A" for effort, and PV got an "F".
>
If 'effort' implies 'pomposity'....then, yes... you get an 'A+++'
> Not my fault.
>
Quite right... any belief that you post anything 'original' is
certainly 'not your fault.' Nor is 'your' original' content
your 'fault.' It is a copy of the words of others.
> I cut your blather. In fact, being blather I did not read it.
>
As with desi... I never presumed that your 'reading skills,'
were so great to begin with. Certainly, you have some
problems with 'statistical tables.' I well expect that my meaning
would have been lost on you, even if you had 'tried' to read
it. You support 'censor' of all thought as it is. So what
is new about 'clipping' my words?
> Did anybody? Speak up.
>
Ah, yes... if someone admitted they did... they would be quickly
added to the list you have, of those you consider 'under the rock,'
or 'possessing a corroded soul,' where you place all who 'disagree
with you.' Demonstrating that you are hardly what would be
considered a 'defender of free thought,' Earl.
Obviously, you feel ashamed that you ever presumed to 'thump
your chest,' in some pitiful display of egotistical self-adoration.
But, we know you are unable to change, Earl. Best to leave
this thread alone, and take your lumps in recognition that your
purpose was to preen yourself in front of the group, in case
anyone 'missed' a meaningless statistic.
PV
> Earl
>
>
Earl Evleth
Visitor à abc...@abcxyz.com a écrit le 8/12/02 22:35 :
>> So I got an "A" for effort, and PV got an "F".
>>
>
> If 'effort' implies 'pomposity'....then, yes... you get an 'A+++'
The green monster of jealousy. You keep getting outclassed.
I am almost ashamed at making you look so bad.
Earl
Rev. Don Kool
David McDonald wrote:
> "Rev. Don Kool" <old...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>David McDonald wrote:
>>>Deswaldo the LIAR Coughlan <statist...@zeouane.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>Deswaldo's meaningless numbers removed!
>>>
>>>Poor Deswaldo "ScriptKiddie" Coughlan, drunk again. :-(
>>
>> It seems that he's destined to follow the family tradition. :-( Let's
>>just hope he doesn't get so drunk that he stumbles out into the street
>>and becomes road pizza like his sister Liz.
>
>
> This sort of thing just feeds the nature/nurture controversy.
Very true.
Yours in Christ,
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<statist...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>From: Statistics <statist...@zeouane.org>
>Date: 8 Dec 2002 12:01:44 GMT
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news
feed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!lnewspeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net
!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!e117.dh
cp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-fo
>r-mail
>From: Statistics <statist...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: alt.activism.death-penalty weekly statistics
>Date: 8 Dec 2002 12:01:44 GMT
>Organization: None
>Lines: 118
>Message-ID: <asvcb7$v3j8q$1...@ID-91468.news.dfncis.de>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1039348904 32623898 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
>X-Summary: Statistics
>Mail-Copies-To: never
>User-Agent: Newsgroup statistics.
>X-Comments: With thanks to "Cab" for the perl
>X-Perl-Script: http://www.zeouane.org/perl/ngstatistics.pl
>X-Abuse-Info: ab...@zeouane.org
JIGSAW1695
Date: 12/8/2002 3:54 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <BA196FFB.472F%evl...@wanadoo.fr>
dans l'article 8iMI9.458081$S8.92...@twister.tampabay.rr.com, A Planet
Visitor à abc...@abcxyz.com a écrit le 8/12/02 19:35 :
>>> Top 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (All Bytes)
>>> ===============================================================
>>> 1. Earl Evleth...............................................: 89.3%
I cut your blather. In fact, being blather I did not read it.
Did anybody? Speak up.
Earl
===============================
Gee Earl, if you did not read it, how did you know the content was "blather".
Are we clairvoyent???? A lucky guesser? Did someone else read it for you and
tell you whether it was good or not?
Jigsaw
Earl Evleth
jigsa...@aol.com a écrit le 9/12/02 6:48 :
> Gee Earl, if you did not read it, how did you know the content was "blather".
> Are we clairvoyent????
I am, with PV, it is blather. One needs not read it.
Earl
A Planet Visitor
"Earl Evleth" <evl...@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:BA1A2793.47E2%evl...@wanadoo.fr...
Quite common among bigots. As with desi, who claims he only
needs to see that a person is a Black, to believe that same
Black 'intends to rob him,' with the words he has placed in the
mouth of that one he presumes will rob him of -- "'Gimmie da money,
honkey mothafucka, oh ah toast yo >ass !!'" He believes that only Blacks
can be robbers, and also obviously believes that only Whites can be
victims.
When one puts blinders on to the truth... anything can be
presumed, in the form of a lie.
PV
>
> Earl
>
>