Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Trolling?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Mason

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 12:49:02 AM2/4/03
to
What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?

Michael Cole

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 3:38:37 AM2/4/03
to

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 3:53:29 AM2/4/03
to
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason <Mas...@webtv.net>
alleged...

> What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?

Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
discussed.
--
Donald Shepherd
<donald_...@hotmail.com>

"no i have to do sam"
- http://home.online.no/~gremmem/engrish_ttt_captions/60-80.htm

Bernard El-Hagin

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 3:55:46 AM2/4/03
to
Donald Shepherd wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason <Mas...@webtv.net>
> alleged...
>> What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?
>
> Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
> discussed.


I disagree.


--
Cheers,
Bernard

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 4:48:44 AM2/4/03
to
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:55:46 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-
hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...

*plonk*

Bernard El-Hagin

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 5:09:49 AM2/4/03
to
Donald Shepherd wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:55:46 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-
> hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...
>> Donald Shepherd wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason <Mas...@webtv.net>
>> > alleged...
>> >> What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?
>> >
>> > Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
>> > discussed.
>>
>>
>> I disagree.
>
>*plonk*


Did you miss the joke, or was your plonk a joke?


Come to think of it, if your plonk is *not* a joke you're not even reading
this.


--
Cheers,
Bernard

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 5:33:33 AM2/4/03
to
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:09:49 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-

hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...
> Donald Shepherd wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:55:46 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-
> > hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...
> >> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason <Mas...@webtv.net>
> >> > alleged...
> >> >> What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?
> >> >
> >> > Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
> >> > discussed.
> >>
> >>
> >> I disagree.
> >
> >*plonk*
>
>
> Did you miss the joke, or was your plonk a joke?
>
>
> Come to think of it, if your plonk is *not* a joke you're not even reading
> this.

*sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent in the combination of
those two words? ;)

Bernard El-Hagin

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 5:39:43 AM2/4/03
to
Donald Shepherd wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:09:49 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-
> hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...
>> Donald Shepherd wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:55:46 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin
>> > <bernard.el- hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...
>> >> Donald Shepherd wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason
>> >> > <Mas...@webtv.net> alleged...
>> >> >> What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these
>> >> >> groups?
>> >> >
>> >> > Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
>> >> > discussed.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I disagree.
>> >
>> >*plonk*
>>
>>
>> Did you miss the joke, or was your plonk a joke?
>>
>>
>> Come to think of it, if your plonk is *not* a joke you're not even
>> reading this.
>
>*sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent in the combination of
> those two words? ;)


I don't deal with people who aren't serious, Sir. Good day.


*plonk*


(Somebody stop the madness!)


--
Cheers,
Bernard

Troels Forchhammer

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 5:53:29 AM2/4/03
to
Donald Shepherd wrote:
>

<snip>

> *sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent in the combination of
> those two words? ;)

Rarely has the word 'oxymoron' been more fitting - is that
what you mean? ;)

--
Troels Forchhammer
Valid mail is t.forch(a)mail.dk

Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true.
Niels Bohr, to a young physicist

Bernard El-Hagin

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 5:54:48 AM2/4/03
to
Troels Forchhammer wrote:

> Donald Shepherd wrote:
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>> *sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent in the combination of
>> those two words? ;)
>
> Rarely has the word 'oxymoron' been more fitting - is that
> what you mean? ;)

There's no need for name calling.


--
Cheers,
Bernard

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 6:05:07 AM2/4/03
to
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:39:43 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-

It'll stop when you plonk me! Because I don't plonk... MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 6:05:39 AM2/4/03
to
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:53:29 +0100, Troels Forchhammer
<Tro...@ThisIsFake.dk> alleged...

> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> > *sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent in the combination of
> > those two words? ;)
>
> Rarely has the word 'oxymoron' been more fitting - is that
> what you mean? ;)

/me nods. Wlel done. :)

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 6:06:11 AM2/4/03
to
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:54:48 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-
hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...

It's more polite than some of the stuff I've been called, and
"oxymoron" has a certain ring to it...
--
Donald the Oxymoronical

Joy

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 5:59:56 AM2/4/03
to
"Bernard El-Hagin" <bernard.el-hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> wrote:
> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
> >> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> >> > Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
> >> >> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> >> >> > Mason alleged...

> >> >> >> What is meant by referring to someone as a
> >> >> >> "troll" in these groups?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Someone who disagrees with your POV on
> >> >> > whatever topic is being discussed.
> >> >>
> >> >> I disagree.
> >> >
> >> >*plonk*
> >>
> >> Did you miss the joke, or was your plonk a joke?
> >>
> >>
> >> Come to think of it, if your plonk is *not* a
> >> joke you're not even reading this.
> >
> >*sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent
> >in the combination of those two words? ;)
>
> I don't deal with people who aren't serious, Sir.
> Good day.
>
> *plonk*

Stupid plonkers.

-joy


Bernard El-Hagin

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 6:38:58 AM2/4/03
to
Joy wrote:


*plonk*


--
Cheers,
Bernard

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 7:08:27 AM2/4/03
to
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:38:58 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-
hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...

Yeah, what he said.

Joy

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 7:49:38 AM2/4/03
to
"Donald Shepherd" <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
> > Joy wrote:

> > > "Bernard El-Hagin" wrote:
> > >> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > >> > Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
> > >> >> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > >> >> > Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
> > >> >> >> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > >> >> >> > Mason alleged...
> > >
> > >> >> >> >> What is meant by referring to someone as a
> > >> >> >> >> "troll" in these groups?
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > Someone who disagrees with your POV on
> > >> >> >> > whatever topic is being discussed.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> I disagree.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >*plonk*
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Did you miss the joke, or was your plonk a joke?
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Come to think of it, if your plonk is *not* a
> > >> >> joke you're not even reading this.
> > >> >
> > >> >*sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent
> > >> >in the combination of those two words? ;)
> > >>
> > >> I don't deal with people who aren't serious, Sir.
> > >> Good day.
> > >>
> > >> *plonk*
> > >
> > > Stupid plonkers.
> >
> > *plonk*
>
> Yeah, what he said.

Stupid plonkers.

-joy


Bernard El-Hagin

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 8:12:48 AM2/4/03
to
Joy wrote:


This ends now!


*plonk*


--
Cheers,
Bernard

Michael O'Neill

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 4:20:04 PM2/4/03
to
Donald Shepherd wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason <Mas...@webtv.net>
> alleged...
> > What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?
>
> Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
> discussed.

<splutter!>

Pardon?

You CAN'T be serious!!!111!!111!1111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!

M.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 8:33:58 AM2/4/03
to
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:12:48 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-
hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...

Yeah, good thing I'm not replying to this otherwise it could go on
forever.

*plonk*

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 8:34:25 AM2/4/03
to
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:20:04 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
alleged...

*plonk*

Yeah you too! Ha! See how you like that, big boy!

Joy

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 8:40:38 AM2/4/03
to
"Donald Shepherd" <donald_...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
>>Joy wrote:
>>>"Donald Shepherd":

>>>>Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
>>>>>Joy wrote:
>>>>>>"Bernard El-Hagin" wrote:
>>>>>>>Donald Shepherd wrote:
>>>>>>>>Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
>>>>>>>>>Donald Shepherd wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>*plonk*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Did you miss the joke, or was your plonk a joke?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Come to think of it, if your plonk is *not* a
>>>>>>>>>joke you're not even reading this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>*sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent
>>>>>>>>in the combination of those two words? ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't deal with people who aren't serious, Sir.
>>>>>>>Good day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>*plonk*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Stupid plonkers.
>>>>>
>>>>>*plonk*
>>>>
>>>>Yeah, what he said.
>>>
>>>Stupid plonkers.
>>
>>This ends now!
>>
>>*plonk*
>
>Yeah, good thing I'm not replying to this otherwise
>it could go on forever.
>
>*plonk*

If you pwonked me, you can't read this:

DLANOD'S A STUPID PLONKER!!

DRANREB'S A STUPID PLONKER!!!!

Neeener neeener neeeeeener!!

Plonkers!!! Plonkers!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!

-joy


Morgil

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 8:55:08 AM2/4/03
to
Hey! Look what Joy is saying about you behind your backs!!

Morgil

"Joy" <queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:191C91BDFE8ED411B844...@pfs21.ex.nus.edu.sg...

Bernard El-Hagin

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 8:59:13 AM2/4/03
to
Morgil wrote:

> "Joy" spewed:


>
>> If you pwonked me, you can't read this:
>>
>> DLANOD'S A STUPID PLONKER!!
>>
>> DRANREB'S A STUPID PLONKER!!!!
>>
>> Neeener neeener neeeeeener!!
>>
>> Plonkers!!! Plonkers!!!
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!
>
>

> Hey! Look what Joy is saying about you behind your backs!!


Thank you for bringing this to my attention, Morgil. I see a plonk wasn't
enough for Joy. I will have to resort to a:


*Plonk*


Yes, that is a capital 'P'. I'm sorry for being so harsh, but you left me
no choice.


--
Cheers,
Bernard

put-the-no-mail-...@mail.ru

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 11:17:14 AM2/4/03
to

Nope. You've already entered the feedback loop. It is highly recommended
that you should unplug your computer (especially if it is a shared
RS/6000 at your workplace) and find the loop with a searchlight and a
wrench.

Archie

Michael O'Neill

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 7:17:35 PM2/4/03
to
Donald Shepherd wrote:
>
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:20:04 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
> alleged...
> > Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason <Mas...@webtv.net>
> > > alleged...
> > > > What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?
> > >
> > > Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
> > > discussed.
> >
> > <splutter!>
> >
> > Pardon?
> >
> > You CAN'T be serious!!!111!!111!1111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!
>
> *plonk*
>
> Yeah you too! Ha! See how you like that, big boy!

Well fuck you, you fuckwitted fuck!

M.

Joy

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 11:34:15 AM2/4/03
to

Ooooh, if I get a Plonk, a Soooperplonk(TM), does that mean you won't be
able to see me even if Morgie brings it to your attention again?

YAY!!!

<singsong>
Dranreb is a plonker! Dranreb is a plonkerrrrrr!! La la la la laaaa!!
</singsong>

Rrrrplprlprlpflpflpflflffffht!!!

/me giggles grilishly

How fun, this plonking business!!

-joy


Joy

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 11:37:09 AM2/4/03
to
"Michael O'Neill" <o...@indigo.ie> wrote:
> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > Mason alleged...

> >
> > > What is meant by referring to someone as a
> > > "troll" in these groups?
> >
> > Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever
> > topic is being discussed.
>
> <splutter!>
>
> Pardon?
>
> You CAN'T be serious!!!111!!111!1111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!

Michael's "!!!!!1!!!11!!11!!"s remind me of that wunderfull resource:
http://ssshotaru.homestead.com/files/aolertranslator.html

"ITS SO COL!!11!!11!! OMG WTF LOL!!!!!!!!111!!!!1!!!!!"

-joy


Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 12:29:43 PM2/4/03
to
Joy <queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> wrote in message
news:191C91BDFE8ED411B844...@pfs21.ex.nus.edu.sg...

*licks the nape of Joy's neck*

--
MarkHW
No longer Ron Hines
But still a bit of a rhino...


Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 12:56:03 PM2/4/03
to
Joy <queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> wrote in message
news:191C91BDFE8ED411B844...@pfs21.ex.nus.edu.sg...

> Michael's "!!!!!1!!!11!!11!!"s remind me of that wunderfull resource:
> http://ssshotaru.homestead.com/files/aolertranslator.html

Hmm.

I started with:

//Hello, my name is Mark.

I am 32, I like weight-training, Elves and fat lasses.//

and ended up with

//HELO MAH NME IS MARK

IM 32 I LIEK WAIGHT-TRANENG 3LVES AND FAT LAS3S1!!11! OMG LOL//

This is an instrument of evil.

Sauron had nothing on this...

E.Buettner

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 3:30:56 PM2/4/03
to

"Michael O'Neill" <o...@indigo.ie> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3E40581F...@indigo.ie...
<snip>

> > Yeah you too! Ha! See how you like that, big boy!
>
> Well fuck you, you fuckwitted fuck!
>
> M.

Aaah, keep it clean, kids! ;-)


E.Buettner

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 3:32:45 PM2/4/03
to

"Joy" <queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:191C91BDFE8ED411B844...@pfs21.ex.nus.edu.sg...

Hey, that is a fun place! REminds me of my kids at school! Thanks!
Eva


Andy Cooke

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 4:05:34 PM2/4/03
to

<plink>

Ah ha ha ha!

Hang on.

/tries again

<plink>

<plink>

Dammit!

<plink>

Oh, for heaven's sake!

/kicks computer

<plunk>

<plunk>

I give up

:-(

--
Andy Cooke

Steuard Jensen

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 5:35:21 PM2/4/03
to
Quoth Mas...@webtv.net (Mason) in article
<11287-3E3...@storefull-2136.public.lawson.webtv.net>:

> What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?

Despite the trolls in Tolkien's Middle-earth, when a participant in
these newsgroups is called a "troll" it is not meant to suggest that
they have enormous strength and a nasty skin condition in the
sunlight. :)

"Trolls" are people who post messages whose primary intent is to upset
others on the group and inspire them to write long, angry replies
(sometimes, the word "troll" refers to the aggravating message
itself). Classic troll topics here include things like "Tolkien's
writing sucks!" or "Tolkien was a racist" (though the latter is
sometimes claimed by people who are merely uninformed). People have
also been known to "troll" these groups by posting deliberately
ill-informed claims on "touchy" on-topic debates ("Balrogs do have
wings, and anyone who says they don't is an idiot!").

I'm told that the term "troll" used in this way actually comes from
fishing, where "trolling" consists of dragging lots of hooks through
the water hoping for a bite. It's a common term on many newsgroups.

Steuard Jensen

Raven

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 2:14:08 PM2/4/03
to
"Joy" <queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:191C91BDFE8ED411B844...@pfs21.ex.nus.edu.sg...

> > *plonk*

> Stupid plonkers.
What's wrong with wa--- oh, you said stupid *plonkers*!
Sorry.

Kirina.


Michael O'Neill

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 2:41:51 AM2/5/03
to

GeeZ! A Pedophile!

M.

put-the-no-mail-...@mail.ru

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 6:58:31 PM2/4/03
to
Mark H Wilkinson wrote:
> Joy <queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:191C91BDFE8ED411B844...@pfs21.ex.nus.edu.sg...
> > "Bernard El-Hagin" wrote:
> > > Morgil wrote:
> > > > "Joy" spewed:
[...]

> *licks the nape of Joy's neck*

This is a standard reply to inform you that your previous post was
taken notice of, but regretfully considered unworthy for an individual
answer. With this reply, we want to express our deepest regret that
you wasted so much of your precious time to formulate your post.

We hereby encourage other posters to take over this standard reply, in
order to give Mark H. Wilkinson/Ron Hines some constructive feedback
about how he has to improve his posting style in order to grow into a
worthy contributor to this newsgroup. Thank you.

Archie

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 8:09:32 PM2/4/03
to
Joy singsonged:
> Bernard El-Hagin planked:
>> Morgil plinked:
>>> Joy plonked:

>>>> If you pwonked me, you can't read this:
>>>> DLANOD'S A STUPID PLONKER!! DRANREB'S A STUPID PLONKER!!!!
>>>> Neeener neeener neeeeeener!! Plonkers!!! Plonkers!!!

This reads like the scwipt to a TEUNCanese Farrelly brothers film...

>>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!
>>> Hey! Look what Joy is saying about you behind your backs!!
>> Thank you for bringing this to my attention, Morgil.
>> I see a plonk wasn't enough for Joy. I will have to
>> resort to a:
>> *Plonk*
>> Yes, that is a capital 'P'. I'm sorry for being so
>> harsh, but you left me no choice.
> Ooooh, if I get a Plonk, a Soooperplonk(TM), does that mean you won't be
> able to see me even if Morgie brings it to your attention again?
>
> YAY!!!
> <singsong>
> Dranreb is a plonker! Dranreb is a plonkerrrrrr!! La la la la laaaa!!
> </singsong>
> Rrrrplprlprlpflpflpflflffffht!!!

Oh, as we saz in Westron, "hurgh".

> /me giggles grilishly

/me giggles byoishly

> How fun, this plonking business!!

Plonk me, Dranreb and Dlanod, I DAAAAAAAARE you!
In fact: TOAST ME!

--
Banazir

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 8:12:25 PM2/4/03
to
Mark H Wilkinson was bax to his nold rhino tricks:
> Joy

>> How fun, this plonking business!!

You think there'll be a few more TEUNCs in this eek's Top 10 List? ;-)

> *licks the nape of Joy's neck*

/me Force-pushes the rhino a few steps bax...
*bzzzrrrNNMZZZRRHZZZffzzzht*

--
Banazir
(grow' em lal you want, we'll slice more)

Joy

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 11:21:40 PM2/4/03
to
"Banazir the Jedi Hobbit" <hs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Joy singsonged:

> > <singsong>
> > Dranreb is a plonker! Dranreb is a plonkerrrrrr!!
> > La la la la laaaa!!
> > </singsong>
> > Rrrrplprlprlpflpflpflflffffht!!!
>
> Oh, as we saz in Westron, "hurgh".
>
> > /me giggles grilishly
>
> /me giggles byoishly
>
> > How fun, this plonking business!!
>
> Plonk me, Dranreb and Dlanod, I DAAAAAAAARE you!
> In fact: TOAST ME!

LOLOL!!!

(Laughing Out Loud Out Loud?)

-joy


Joy

unread,
Feb 4, 2003, 11:20:21 PM2/4/03
to
"Banazir the Jedi Hobbit" <hs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Mark H Wilkinson was bax to his nold rhino tricks:
> > Joy
>
> >> How fun, this plonking business!!
>
> You think there'll be a few more TEUNCs in this eek's
> Top 10 List? ;-)

Oooh yay! I hope so... I haven't been on there in a few months...

> > *licks the nape of Joy's neck*

EW!

> /me Force-pushes the rhino a few steps bax...
> *bzzzrrrNNMZZZRRHZZZffzzzht*

> (grow' em lal you want, we'll slice more)

Thank yew again. This Mark fellow (or at least his tongue) wreally seems to
have a thing for me....
/me loonks worried.

-joy


Bernard El-Hagin

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 2:32:47 AM2/5/03
to


Oh make up your mind, why doncha!


(I suggest something subtle, like a delicate rouge and no lipstick.)


--
Cheers,
Bernard

Coconut

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 5:14:44 AM2/5/03
to

"Steuard Jensen" <sbje...@midway.uchicago.edu> wrote in message
news:JeX%9.119$x4.2...@news.uchicago.edu...

says they don't is an idiot!").
>
> I'm told that the term "troll" used in this way actually comes from
> fishing, where "trolling" consists of dragging lots of hooks through
> the water hoping for a bite.


Hehe, I remember the first time I heard someone say, "I'm going trollin' for
chicks." It just sounded really funny at the time. Ahh, never mind, it
doesn't look very funny out of context.


Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 6:58:24 AM2/5/03
to
Andy Cooke <cooke...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3E402B1E...@hotmail.com...

> <plink>
>
> Ah ha ha ha!
>
> Hang on.
>
> /tries again
>
> <plink>
>
> <plink>
>
> Dammit!
>
> <plink>
>
> Oh, for heaven's sake!
>
> /kicks computer
>
> <plunk>
>
> <plunk>
>
> I give up
>
> :-(

What a plinker.

Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 6:59:37 AM2/5/03
to
Joy <queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> wrote in message
news:191C91BDFE8ED411B844...@pfs21.ex.nus.edu.sg...

> Thank yew again. This Mark fellow (or at least his tongue) wreally seems


to
> have a thing for me....
> /me loonks worried.

Oh, you're intriguing, but probably far too young for me.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:33:33 AM2/5/03
to
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:55:08 +0200, Morgil <more...@hotmail.com>
alleged...

> Hey! Look what Joy is saying about you behind your backs!!

Don't top psot!!! *plonk*

> "Joy" <queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> kirjoitti
> viestissä:191C91BDFE8ED411B844...@pfs21.ex.nus.edu.sg...
>
> > If you pwonked me, you can't read this:
> >
> > DLANOD'S A STUPID PLONKER!!
> >
> > DRANREB'S A STUPID PLONKER!!!!
> >
> > Neeener neeener neeeeeener!!
> >
> > Plonkers!!! Plonkers!!!
> >
> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!
> >
> > -joy

Thanks for bringing this to my attention though. It looks like I'm
going to have to hunt her down and kill her now.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:34:05 AM2/5/03
to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 00:34:15 +0800 , Joy
<queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> alleged...

> /me giggles grilishly
>
> How fun, this plonking business!!

Maybe I've got a dirty mind, but that seems wrong on so many levels...

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:34:27 AM2/5/03
to
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:05:34 +0000, Andy Cooke <cooke...@hotmail.com>
alleged...

/me checks newsreader.

Ah, yes. Get a proper one. :)

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:35:19 AM2/5/03
to
On 4 Feb 2003 17:12:25 -0800, Banazir the Jedi Hobbit
<hs...@hotmail.com> alleged...

> Mark H Wilkinson was bax to his nold rhino tricks:
> > Joy
>
> >> How fun, this plonking business!!
>
> You think there'll be a few more TEUNCs in this eek's Top 10 List? ;-)

This weeks' seems to have disappeared, seeing as though it's now
Wednesday... or has he changed the day?

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:35:51 AM2/5/03
to
On 4 Feb 2003 17:09:32 -0800, Banazir the Jedi Hobbit
<hs...@hotmail.com> alleged...

> > How fun, this plonking business!!
>
> Plonk me, Dranreb and Dlanod, I DAAAAAAAARE you!
> In fact: TOAST ME!

/me toasts Banazir's plonk.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:36:13 AM2/5/03
to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:21:40 +0800 , Joy
<queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> alleged...

> LOLOL!!!
>
> (Laughing Out Loud Out Loud?)

Laughing Out Loud Overly Loudly

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:36:45 AM2/5/03
to
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:17:35 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
alleged...
> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:20:04 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
> > alleged...
> > > Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason <Mas...@webtv.net>
> > > > alleged...

> > > > > What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?
> > > >
> > > > Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
> > > > discussed.
> > >
> > > <splutter!>
> > >
> > > Pardon?
> > >
> > > You CAN'T be serious!!!111!!111!1111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!
> >
> > *plonk*

> >
> > Yeah you too! Ha! See how you like that, big boy!
>
> Well fuck you, you fuckwitted fuck!

/me goes and cries in the corner.
--
Donald Shepherd
<donald_...@hotmail.com>

See, told you it wasn't hard.

Joy

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:41:11 AM2/5/03
to
"Mark H Wilkinson" <pabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Joy wrote:
>
> > Thank yew again. This Mark fellow (or at least
> > his tongue) wreally seems to have a thing for
> > me....
> > /me loonks worried.
>
> Oh, you're intriguing, but probably far too young
> for me.

Probabubbly. (Lathough I *have* had an "I'd marry you if you were younger"
quasi-declaration of love on Usenet before.... It was really...
interesting...)

-joy


Joy

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:42:24 AM2/5/03
to
"Donald Shepherd" <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Banazir the Jedi Hobbit alleged...

> > > How fun, this plonking business!!
> >
> > Plonk me, Dranreb and Dlanod, I DAAAAAAAARE you!
> > In fact: TOAST ME!
>
> /me toasts Banazir's plonk.

Now *that* does knot sound too goond.

-joy


Joy

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:43:04 AM2/5/03
to
"Donald Shepherd" <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Joy alleged...

> > /me giggles grilishly
> >
> > How fun, this plonking business!!
>
> Maybe I've got a dirty mind, but that seems wrong
> on so many levels...

Aye, you just have a durty mind.

-joy


Joy

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:48:10 AM2/5/03
to
"Donald Shepherd" <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Morgil alleged...

> > Hey! Look what Joy is saying about you behind your backs!!
>
> Don't top psot!!! *plonk*

Yeah, stupid top-psotter!!

> > "Joy" wrote:
> >
> > > If you pwonked me, you can't read this:
> > >
> > > DLANOD'S A STUPID PLONKER!!
> > >
> > > DRANREB'S A STUPID PLONKER!!!!
> > >
> > > Neeener neeener neeeeeener!!
> > >
> > > Plonkers!!! Plonkers!!!
> > >
> > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!
> > >
> > > -joy
>
> Thanks for bringing this to my attention though.
> It looks like I'm going to have to hunt her down
> and kill her now.

Yeah, I'd like to see you TRY!!!
/me tosses hair over shoulder and calibrates cybernetic crysknife.

-joy


Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 7:59:59 AM2/5/03
to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 02:14:44 -0800, Coconut <nos...@nospam.net>
alleged...

It's very funny when you can imagine someone to who it can be applied
to. :)

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 8:01:56 AM2/5/03
to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:48:10 +0800 , Joy
<queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> alleged...

> "Donald Shepherd" <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > "Joy" wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you pwonked me, you can't read this:
> > > >
> > > > DLANOD'S A STUPID PLONKER!!
> > > >
> > > > DRANREB'S A STUPID PLONKER!!!!
> > > >
> > > > Neeener neeener neeeeeener!!
> > > >
> > > > Plonkers!!! Plonkers!!!
> > > >
> > > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!
> > > >
> > > > -joy
> >
> > Thanks for bringing this to my attention though.
> > It looks like I'm going to have to hunt her down
> > and kill her now.
>
> Yeah, I'd like to see you TRY!!!
> /me tosses hair over shoulder and calibrates cybernetic crysknife.

One of these days... I might remember this vow and then you'll be in
trouble!

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 8:02:38 AM2/5/03
to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:42:24 +0800 , Joy
<queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> alleged...

Plonk = nondescript alcohol, usually some sort of fortified wine in the
language of my father and grandfather, so it's actually quite nice.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 8:03:10 AM2/5/03
to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:43:04 +0800 , Joy
<queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> alleged...

Well, I guess that never really was in question...

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 8:03:52 AM2/5/03
to
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:17:14 +0300, put-the-no-mail-out-archimedes99
@mail.ru <put-the-no-mail-...@mail.ru> alleged...

> Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
> > Donald Shepherd wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:09:49 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin <bernard.el-
> > > hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...
> > >> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:55:46 +0000 (UTC), Bernard El-Hagin
> > >> > <bernard.el- hagin@DODGE_THISlido-tech.net> alleged...

> > >> >> Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason
> > >> >> > <Mas...@webtv.net> alleged...
> > >> >> >> What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these
> > >> >> >> groups?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
> > >> >> > discussed.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I disagree.
> > >> >
> > >> >*plonk*
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Did you miss the joke, or was your plonk a joke?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Come to think of it, if your plonk is *not* a joke you're not even
> > >> reading this.
> > >
> > >*sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent in the combination of
> > > those two words? ;)
> >
> >
> > I don't deal with people who aren't serious, Sir. Good day.
> >
> >
> > *plonk*
> >
> >
> > (Somebody stop the madness!)
>
> Nope. You've already entered the feedback loop. It is highly recommended
> that you should unplug your computer (especially if it is a shared
> RS/6000 at your workplace) and find the loop with a searchlight and a
> wrench.

/me hits Bernard over the head with the wench.

/me then puts Joy down and hits Bernard over the head with the _wrench_
this time.

Bernard El-Hagin

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 8:21:34 AM2/5/03
to
Donald Shepherd wrote:


I was about to say that you got those two mixed up, but then I remembered
that you didn't.


--
Cheers,
Bernard

Joy

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 8:12:48 AM2/5/03
to
"Donald Shepherd" <donald_...@yahoo.com>wrote:

>put-the-no-mail-...@mail.ru alleged...
>>Bernard El-Hagin wrote:
>>>Donald Shepherd wrote:
>>>>Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
>>>>>Donald Shepherd wrote:
>>>>>>Bernard El-Hagin alleged...
>>>>>>>Donald Shepherd wrote:
>>>>>>>>Mason alleged...

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll"
>>>>>>>>>in these groups?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever
>>>>>>>>topic is being discussed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I disagree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>*plonk*
>>>>>
>>>>>Did you miss the joke, or was your plonk a joke?
>>>>>
>>>>>Come to think of it, if your plonk is *not* a joke
>>>>>you're not even reading this.
>>>>
>>>>*sigh* Serious. Me. See the problem inherent in
>>>>the combination of those two words? ;)
>>>
>>>I don't deal with people who aren't serious, Sir.
>>>Good day.
>>>
>>>*plonk*
>>>
>>>(Somebody stop the madness!)
>>
>>Nope. You've already entered the feedback loop. It
>>is highly recommended that you should unplug your
>>computer (especially if it is a shared RS/6000 at
>>your workplace) and find the loop with a searchlight
>>and a wrench.
>
>/me hits Bernard over the head with the wench.

OW!!!!!!

>/me then puts Joy down and hits Bernard over the head
>with the _wrench_ this time.

/me smacks the back of Dlanod's head with a rolled up gnuspaper.

-joy


Tamfiiris Entwife

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 1:08:56 PM2/5/03
to
Error: [put-the-no-mail-...@mail.ru] not found.

> This is a standard reply to inform you that your previous post was
> taken notice of, but regretfully considered unworthy for an individual
> answer. With this reply, we want to express our deepest regret that
> you wasted so much of your precious time to formulate your post.

plink!
plinketyplank!
plonk!
plonk plonk plunk!
pink punk ponk!

(beginning of The Moria Sonata, for 12 hammers and a big rock)

--
Tamf, lellow dwagin and CHOKLIT-eater at your service.

probably not pondering what you are pondering.

the softrat

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 2:08:27 PM2/5/03
to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:41:11 +0800 , "Joy"
<queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Probabubbly. (Lathough I *have* had an "I'd marry you if you were younger"
>quasi-declaration of love on Usenet before.... It was really...
>interesting...)
>
They wanna marry a four ear-old??!!??

Kinky!

How Arkansaw of them.


the softrat "Wannabe orcodentist"
==>Jar-jaromir Lives!<==
mailto:sof...@pobox.com
--
If someone annoys you, it takes 42 muscles to frown, but it only
takes 4 muscles to extend your arm and whack them in the head.

Tamfiiris Entwife

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 5:07:01 PM2/5/03
to
Error: [Donald Shepherd] not found.

(Top 10 List)



> This weeks' seems to have disappeared, seeing as though it's now
> Wednesday... or has he changed the day?

He (note capitl h) spent 11 hours at work today, most of them in an
entmoot... the lists might be around later tonight, or not.


--
Tamf, lellow dwagin and CHOKLIT-eater at your service.

Hitler was evil cause his moustache was too small.
He suffered from a moustache inferiority complex.

Michael O'Neill

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 1:40:55 AM2/6/03
to
Donald Shepherd wrote:
>
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:17:35 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
> alleged...
> > Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:20:04 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
> > > alleged...
> > > > Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:49:02 -0500 (EST), Mason <Mas...@webtv.net>
> > > > > alleged...
> > > > > > What is meant by referring to someone as a "troll" in these groups?
> > > > >
> > > > > Someone who disagrees with your POV on whatever topic is being
> > > > > discussed.
> > > >
> > > > <splutter!>
> > > >
> > > > Pardon?
> > > >
> > > > You CAN'T be serious!!!111!!111!1111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!
> > >
> > > *plonk*
> > >
> > > Yeah you too! Ha! See how you like that, big boy!
> >
> > Well fuck you, you fuckwitted fuck!
>
> /me goes and cries in the corner.

<snort!>

M.

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 8:44:03 PM2/5/03
to
The Softrat wrote:
> Joy recalled:

>> Probabubbly. (Lathough I *have* had an "I'd marry you if you were younger"
>> quasi-declaration of love on Usenet before.... It was really...
>> interesting...)
>
> They wanna marry a four ear-old??!!?? Kinky! How Arkansaw of them.

I think she meant "if you were older", which is nice (knot to mention legal).

Aslo, how long is an ear?

--
Banazir

put-the-no-mail-...@mail.ru

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 9:51:25 PM2/5/03
to
Tamfiiris Entwife wrote:
> Error: [put-the-no-mail-...@mail.ru] not found.
>
> > This is a standard reply to inform you that your previous post was
> > taken notice of, but regretfully considered unworthy for an individual
> > answer. With this reply, we want to express our deepest regret that
> > you wasted so much of your precious time to formulate your post.
>
> plink!
> plinketyplank!
> plonk!
> plonk plonk plunk!
> pink punk ponk!
>
> (beginning of The Moria Sonata, for 12 hammers and a big rock)
I am as music-challenged as a grizzly bear. My only instrument here would
be a heavy two-handed railroad hammer that would put its target to a
premature and quick end.

Archie

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 10:06:00 PM2/5/03
to
Dlanod swore:
> Joy wielded:
>> Dlanod hunted:

>>> It looks like I'm going to have to hunt her down and kill her now.
>>
>> Yeah, I'd like to see you TRY!!!
>> /me tosses hair over shoulder and calibrates cybernetic crysknife.
>
> One of these days...
> I might remember this vow and then you'll be in trouble!

Swear it to Manwe and Varda and they'll memember it fro you...
*reggins*

(B'sides, you'll hafta get past me, which is knot likely fro a Nazgul)

--
Banazir

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 10:09:52 PM2/5/03
to
Joy smaxed:
> Donald Shepherd hit:
>> Archie fanned the flames:

[SNIP, lpease!]

>>> Nope. You've already entered the feedback loop. It is highly recommended
>>> that you should unplug your computer (especially if it is a shared RS/6000
>>> at your workplace) and find the loop with a searchlight and a wrench.
>>
>> /me hits Bernard over the head with the wench.
>
> OW!!!!!!

Amuzzling, this thread is bleeding bax and froth between AFT and TEUNC...

>> /me then puts Joy down and hits Bernard over the head
>> with the _wrench_ this time.
>
> /me smacks the back of Dlanod's head with a rolled up gnuspaper.

Amazzling! I though gnus passed through Dlanod's heead. #-)
/me smacks the bax of Dlanod's head with a rolled-up barrow blade.
Hey, it sounds just liek *plonk*

--
Banazir

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 11:23:32 PM2/5/03
to
Dlanod fortified:
> Joy sounded:
>> Dlanod double-rog dared:
>>> Banazir DAAAAAAARED:

>>>> In fact: TOAST ME!
>>> /me toasts Banazir's plonk.
>> Now *that* does knot sound too goond.
> Plonk = nondescript alcohol, usually some sort of fortified wine in the
> language of my father and grandfather, so it's actually quite nice.

# Banazir wuz a hobbit
Wuz a goond fwend o' mine
I never unnerstoond a single wrod he said [*]
But I helped him-a dwink his uine...
An' he walays had some mighty fine uine... #

(Turemon: you know the rest, nesupasu? :-))

[*] this is flase

--
Banazir
(arrr! now who's goin' ter walk the plonk, mateys?)

the softrat

unread,
Feb 5, 2003, 11:50:15 PM2/5/03
to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:07:01 -0000, Tamfiiris Entwife <nos...@nono.no>
wrote:

>Error: [Donald Shepherd] not found.
>
>(Top 10 List)
>
>> This weeks' seems to have disappeared, seeing as though it's now
>> Wednesday... or has he changed the day?
>
>He (note capitl h) spent 11 hours at work today, most of them in an
>entmoot... the lists might be around later tonight, or not.

Aha! So *that's* why lawyers/attorneys/barristers are so wordy! They
are the stunted little ent-bushes.


the softrat "Wannabe orcodentist"
==>Jar-jaromir Lives!<==
mailto:sof...@pobox.com
--

Half the people you know are below average. -- Steven Wright

Joy

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 3:34:50 AM2/6/03
to
"the softrat" <sof...@pobox.com> wrote:

> "Joy" wrote:
> >
> >Probabubbly. (Lathough I *have* had an "I'd
> >marry you if you were younger" quasi-declaration
> >of love on Usenet before.... It was really...
> >interesting...)
>
> They wanna marry a four ear-old??!!??
>
> Kinky!
>
> How Arkansaw of them.

LOL!!!! Urm, I meant "nolder", of curse.

-joy


Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 3:56:33 AM2/6/03
to
On 5 Feb 2003 19:06:00 -0800, Banazir the Jedi Hobbit
<hs...@hotmail.com> alleged...

I'll just have to wait until you're dead then!
--
*Dlanod*, *the* *Sparkly* *Nazgul*
Pimp of Morgoth, Worshipper of Arwen Lune, Rider of Ducks, Fool of AFT

"If Tolkien had meant for us to have a sense of humor, he would have
told us so." - Mark Reichart

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 3:57:45 AM2/6/03
to
On 5 Feb 2003 19:09:52 -0800, Banazir the Jedi Hobbit
<hs...@hotmail.com> alleged...

> Joy smaxed:
> > Donald Shepherd hit:
> >> Archie fanned the flames:
>
> [SNIP, lpease!]
>
> >>> Nope. You've already entered the feedback loop. It is highly recommended
> >>> that you should unplug your computer (especially if it is a shared RS/6000
> >>> at your workplace) and find the loop with a searchlight and a wrench.
> >>
> >> /me hits Bernard over the head with the wench.
> >
> > OW!!!!!!
>
> Amuzzling, this thread is bleeding bax and froth between AFT and TEUNC...

Who did that? /me looks innocent.

> >> /me then puts Joy down and hits Bernard over the head
> >> with the _wrench_ this time.
> >
> > /me smacks the back of Dlanod's head with a rolled up gnuspaper.
>
> Amazzling! I though gnus passed through Dlanod's heead. #-)
> /me smacks the bax of Dlanod's head with a rolled-up barrow blade.
> Hey, it sounds just liek *plonk*

OK, who did _that_? I heard something, but the sparkliness must have
prevented whatever happened.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 3:58:37 AM2/6/03
to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:07:01 -0000, Tamfiiris Entwife <nos...@nono.no>
alleged...

> Error: [Donald Shepherd] not found.
>
> (Top 10 List)
>
> > This weeks' seems to have disappeared, seeing as though it's now
> > Wednesday... or has he changed the day?
>
> He (note capitl h) spent 11 hours at work today, most of them in an
> entmoot... the lists might be around later tonight, or not.

That's quite alright. Those things can be horrible.

Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 6:35:42 AM2/6/03
to

Donald Shepherd <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18acc038f...@news.cis.dfn.de...

> On 5 Feb 2003 19:06:00 -0800, Banazir the Jedi Hobbit
> <hs...@hotmail.com> alleged...
> > Dlanod swore:
> > > Joy wielded:
> > >> Dlanod hunted:
> >
> > >>> It looks like I'm going to have to hunt her down and kill her now.
> > >>
> > >> Yeah, I'd like to see you TRY!!!
> > >> /me tosses hair over shoulder and calibrates cybernetic crysknife.
> > >
> > > One of these days...
> > > I might remember this vow and then you'll be in trouble!
> >
> > Swear it to Manwe and Varda and they'll memember it fro you...
> > *reggins*
> >
> > (B'sides, you'll hafta get past me, which is knot likely fro a Nazgul)
>
> I'll just have to wait until you're dead then!

It's gonna be quite soon. He's already got to face down Faramir's company
and myself.

--
MarkHW
No longer Ron Hines
But still a bit of a rhino...


Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 8:25:48 AM2/6/03
to
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:35:42 -0000, Mark H Wilkinson <only_mhw1
@hotmail.com> alleged...

Last time I checked he was doing quite well against you...

Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 11:36:33 AM2/6/03
to
Donald Shepherd <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18acff512...@news.cis.dfn.de...

> Last time I checked he was doing quite well against you...

Check again. He has the arrows of Gondor at his throat, and I've got Rolf
Harris involved.

Besides, I'm deliberately going easy on him.

I've still got Michael Flatley in reserve.

Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 11:39:15 AM2/6/03
to

Donald Shepherd <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18acc0884...@news.cis.dfn.de...

*a rhino runs by waving sparklies*

I've got sparklies me.

*runs off*

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 12:40:13 PM2/6/03
to
Joy meant:
> The Softrat kinked:
>> Joy wrote:

>>> Probabubbly. (Lathough I *have* had an "I'd marry you if you were
>>> younger" quasi-declaration of love on Usenet before....
>>> It was really... interesting...)
>>
>> They wanna marry a four ear-old??!!?? Kinky! How Arkansaw of them.
>
> LOL!!!! Urm, I meant "nolder", of curse.

"I'd marry you if you were Noldor"?
(I dknot knowed there were Quendi outside of RASFW and AFT/RABT...)

--
Banazir

Dr. Ernst Stavro Blofeld

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 7:59:23 PM2/6/03
to
Banazir the Jedi Hobbit sang sea-chanties:

> Dlanod fortified:
> > Joy sounded:
> >> Dlanod double-rog dared:
> >>> Banazir DAAAAAAARED:
>
> >>>> In fact: TOAST ME!
> >>> /me toasts Banazir's plonk.
> >> Now *that* does knot sound too goond.
> > Plonk = nondescript alcohol, usually some sort of fortified wine in the
> > language of my father and grandfather, so it's actually quite nice.
>
> # Banazir wuz a hobbit
> Wuz a goond fwend o' mine
> I never unnerstoond a single wrod he said [*]
> But I helped him-a dwink his uine...
> An' he walays had some mighty fine uine... #

<me takes control of AFT behind all the trolling, plonking and toasting>

Now this is MY newsgroup!!!

> Banazir
> (arrr! now who's goin' ter walk the plonk, mateys?)

<In me best Popeye>
I can't stands no more! d(;op){

--
"I have enough firepower in my crater to annihilate a small army."


Ermanna

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 8:47:59 PM2/6/03
to

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit made dwagin-sized wripples in the Force:

> Dlanod swore:
> > Joy wielded:
> >> Dlanod hunted:
> >>> It looks like I'm going to have to hunt her down and kill her now.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I'd like to see you TRY!!!
> >> /me tosses hair over shoulder and calibrates cybernetic crysknife.
> >
> > One of these days...
> > I might remember this vow and then you'll be in trouble!
<shnip>

> (B'sides, you'll hafta get past me, which is knot likely fro a Nazgul)

Banazir, have you decided to be the Protector of Ladies?
You seem to be defending us a lot recently. (not that I'm
complaining, mind you)

> --
> Banazir

Ermanna the Elven Jedi Knight, Lady of Imladris,
Headmistress of the AFT/RABT Charm School,
Hug-Therapist, Queen of the Balrog Wingophiles,
Protector of Kittens and Hamsters, Wielder of TinwÄ— and Smiter,
Warrior Princess of AFT/RABT

And if you are, I move we call you the Maiden's Knight.


Ermanna

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 8:52:12 PM2/6/03
to

Donald Shepherd made dwagin-sized wripples in the Force:

> On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:17:35 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
> alleged...
> > Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > > On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:20:04 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
> > > alleged...
<shnip>

> > > *plonk*
> > >
> > > Yeah you too! Ha! See how you like that, big boy!
> >
> > Well fuck you, you fuckwitted fuck!
>
> /me goes and cries in the corner.

Now look what you've done, Michael!

<hugs the Nazgul while glaring at the Irishman>

> --
> Donald Shepherd
> <donald_...@hotmail.com>
>
> See, told you it wasn't hard.

Ermanna the Elven Jedi Knight, Lady of Imladris,
Headmistress of the AFT/RABT Charm School,
Hug-Therapist, Queen of the Balrog Wingophiles,
Protector of Kittens and Hamsters, Wielder of TinwÄ— and Smiter,
Warrior Princess of AFT/RABT

You can never become whole unless you embrace the weirdness in
yourself.


Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 3:09:03 AM2/7/03
to
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:36:33 -0000, Mark H Wilkinson <pabl...@yahoo.com>
alleged...

> Donald Shepherd <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.18acff512...@news.cis.dfn.de...
>
> > Last time I checked he was doing quite well against you...
>
> Check again. He has the arrows of Gondor at his throat, and I've got Rolf
> Harris involved.
>
> Besides, I'm deliberately going easy on him.
>
> I've still got Michael Flatley in reserve.

It's Banazir. He's always got something in reserve.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 3:09:36 AM2/7/03
to
On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 20:52:12 -0500, Ermanna <Erm...@nospam.solinas.org>
alleged...

>
> Donald Shepherd made dwagin-sized wripples in the Force:
> > On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:17:35 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
> > alleged...
> > > Donald Shepherd wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:20:04 -0800, Michael O'Neill <o...@indigo.ie>
> > > > alleged...
> <shnip>
> > > > *plonk*
> > > >
> > > > Yeah you too! Ha! See how you like that, big boy!
> > >
> > > Well fuck you, you fuckwitted fuck!
> >
> > /me goes and cries in the corner.
>
> Now look what you've done, Michael!
>
> <hugs the Nazgul while glaring at the Irishman>

Pity works again!

Wait, scratch the 'again'.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 3:21:13 AM2/7/03
to
On Fri, 07 Feb 2003 00:59:23 GMT, Dr. Ernst Stavro Blofeld
<eblo...@SPECTRE.org> alleged...

> <me takes control of AFT behind all the trolling, plonking and toasting>
>
> Now this is MY newsgroup!!!

/me watches everyone ignore Blofeld and wander around on their own.

Interesting terms of ownership...

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 3:22:03 AM2/7/03
to
On 6 Feb 2003 09:40:13 -0800, Banazir the Jedi Hobbit
<hs...@hotmail.com> alleged...

I'd take her to the Anti-discrimination office if I was you. Speciesist
_and_ racist.

Joy

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 10:39:35 AM2/7/03
to
"Banazir the Jedi Hobbit" <hs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Joy meant:
> > The Softrat kinked:
> >> Joy wrote:
>
> >>> Probabubbly. (Lathough I *have* had an "I'd
> >>> marry you if you were younger"
<snip>

> >> They wanna marry a four ear-old??!!??
> >> Kinky! How Arkansaw of them.
> >
> > LOL!!!! Urm, I meant "nolder", of curse.
>
> "I'd marry you if you were Noldor"?
> (I dknot knowed there were Quendi outside of
> RASFW and AFT/RABT...)

<whisper>
They're *everywhere*...
</whisper>

-joy


Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 1:52:08 PM2/7/03
to
Donald Shepherd <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18ae069aa...@news.cis.dfn.de...

> Mark H Wilkinson <pabl...@yahoo.com> alleged...

> > I've still got Michael Flatley in reserve.


>
> It's Banazir. He's always got something in reserve.

Hah, he's still got the 3 Stooges to deal with *and* I've got the flying
monkeys to come.

Oooh, Donald, the Flying Monkeys...

Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 1:56:14 PM2/7/03
to
Ermanna <Erm...@nospam.solinas.org> wrote in message
news:3E43104F...@nospam.solinas.org...

> Banazir the Jedi Hobbit made dwagin-sized wripples in the Force:

> > (B'sides, you'll hafta get past me, which is knot likely fro a Nazgul)


>
> Banazir, have you decided to be the Protector of Ladies?
> You seem to be defending us a lot recently. (not that I'm
> complaining, mind you)

Atcherly, I just think he's going through an aggressive phase. He's been
attacking me for little reason right-left & centre. I keep having to
regenerate my tongue.

Hmm, maybe he just needs a girlfriend...

Mark H Wilkinson

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 1:59:21 PM2/7/03
to
Donald Shepherd <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18ae06b9e...@news.cis.dfn.de...

> Ermanna <Erm...@nospam.solinas.org> alleged...
> > Donald Shepherd made dwagin-sized wripples in the Force:

> > > /me goes and cries in the corner.


> >
> > Now look what you've done, Michael!
> >
> > <hugs the Nazgul while glaring at the Irishman>
>
> Pity works again!
>
> Wait, scratch the 'again'.

Errm, no offence, Don, but I thought Nazgul were supposed to be terrifying
wraiths, not little milksops who need to be comforted by teenage girls...

Hmm. There's method in your madness, isn't there?

/me cries

[Hah, now I'll get hugs from all the young girlies! Lucky no-one can read
this bit.]

Smaug69

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 3:46:43 PM2/7/03
to
"Joy" <queen_y...@THIShotmail.com> wrote in message news:<191C91BDFE8ED411B844...@pfs21.ex.nus.edu.sg>...

<comes in dressed unconvincingly in a far-too small colonel's uniform>

Stop that! I must insist that this thread immediately be stopped. It
has become far too silly and very unserious-like. Besides which, I
don't believe anyone around here has a valid plonking license. Rest
assured, the Perpetual Institute Permitting Plonking In
Newsgroups(commonly called PIPPIN), shall be contacted forthwith and
heretofor and two-by-four and so on and ad infinitum
anti-perspirant...oh damn...I'll come in again...

<wanders off mumbling under his dragon breath about silliness and
cheese>

Smaug69(And everbody nose ears are nolder than they appear)

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 6:44:08 PM2/7/03
to
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:52:08 -0000, Mark H Wilkinson <pabl...@yahoo.com>
alleged...
> Donald Shepherd <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.18ae069aa...@news.cis.dfn.de...
> > Mark H Wilkinson <pabl...@yahoo.com> alleged...
>
> > > I've still got Michael Flatley in reserve.
> >
> > It's Banazir. He's always got something in reserve.
>
> Hah, he's still got the 3 Stooges to deal with *and* I've got the flying
> monkeys to come.
>
> Oooh, Donald, the Flying Monkeys...

Pah, even I can deal with them.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 6:45:01 PM2/7/03
to
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:59:21 -0000, Mark H Wilkinson <pabl...@yahoo.com>
alleged...

> Donald Shepherd <donald_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.18ae06b9e...@news.cis.dfn.de...
> > Ermanna <Erm...@nospam.solinas.org> alleged...
> > > Donald Shepherd made dwagin-sized wripples in the Force:
>
> > > > /me goes and cries in the corner.
> > >
> > > Now look what you've done, Michael!
> > >
> > > <hugs the Nazgul while glaring at the Irishman>
> >
> > Pity works again!
> >
> > Wait, scratch the 'again'.
>
> Errm, no offence, Don, but I thought Nazgul were supposed to be terrifying
> wraiths, not little milksops who need to be comforted by teenage girls...

Appearances can be misleading.

> Hmm. There's method in your madness, isn't there?

There usually is.

> /me cries
>
> [Hah, now I'll get hugs from all the young girlies! Lucky no-one can read
> this bit.]

/me hugs Mark. Awwww there it'll be alright.

Donald Shepherd

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 6:59:10 PM2/7/03
to
On 7 Feb 2003 12:46:43 -0800, Smaug69 <sma...@yahoo.com> alleged...

Of course everyone knows what's coming next...

Which is why I'm not going to do it.

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 8:42:09 PM2/7/03
to
MarkHW monkeyed:
> Dlanod showed a lille faith:
>> MarkHW reserved:

>>> I've still got Michael Flatley in reserve.

Bha, toast me!

http://flyingmoose.org/tolksarc/book/book2_09.htm

I helped choreograph Tom Bombadil's _Lord of The Prance_
when you were still an incipient Rhinoblast. #-)

>> It's Banazir. He's always got something in reserve.

Why, thank you fro the vote of confidence, Nazgul!
*ethereal handshake*

> Hah, he's still got the 3 Stooges to deal with

Dealt. I summoned Shemp (lemme tlel you, Shemp on ice is fedinately
worse than shrimp ice cream!) and I geased them to resurrect the
spirit of 1933. It was depressing. Then I used the Force to goose,
eyepoke, and trip them; a lille ventriloquism a la Mithrandir and they
fell to trasking themelves. Oft Stooge will Stooge mar.

> *and* I've got the flying monkeys to come.
> Oooh, Donald, the Flying Monkeys...

Tucker's trick at the Sunnydale High prom?
Lpease, that is SO 2002...

--
Banazir
(yer wanna unleash a Torog-Han, that might be more ninterestink)

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 9:07:01 PM2/7/03
to
MarkHW cried Black and White rhinocroc tears:
> Dlanod sparkled:
>> Ermanna huggled:

>>> Donald Shepherd made dwagin-sized wripples in the Force:

>>>> /me goes and cries in the corner.
>>> Now look what you've done, Michael!
>>> <hugs the Nazgul while glaring at the Irishman>
>>
>> Pity works again!
>> Wait, scratch the 'again'.

LOL!



> Errm, no offence, Don, but I thought Nazgul were supposed to be terrifying
> wraiths

He's a SPARKLY Nazgul.
Give him some credit; it's quite hard to terrify when you are that sparkly.

> not little milksops who need to be comforted by teenage girls...
> Hmm. There's method in your madness, isn't there?
> /me cries

Yeesh! Have a *lille* dignity, hrm?
Are we men, or are we... erm...

*ponder ponder*

(nermine)

> [Hah, now I'll get hugs from all the young girlies! Lucky no-one can read
> this bit.]

--
Banazir

Banazir the Jedi Hobbit

unread,
Feb 8, 2003, 1:26:54 AM2/8/03
to
MarkHW called the kettle black:
> Ermanna asked:
>> Banazir the Jedi Hobbit defended:

>>> (B'sides, you'll hafta get past me, which is knot likely fro a
Nazgul)
>> Banazir, have you decided to be the Protector of Ladies?

Welp, it's part of my job descwiption as a Jedi, nesupasu?
Kindasrota liek your being the Defender of Helpless Gentlemen and
Kittens and Hamsters.

Acksherly, I've been the defender of womenflok since afore I was
officiously a TEUNC - s'just the waz MOM raised me, I s'pose.

>> You seem to be defending us a lot recently.
>> (not that I'm complaining, mind you)

Knot that I'm complaining, either, but as a matterfact, it would help
if the kidnappings and ankle-lickings were reduced. But when it's
generally in goond fnu I dknot intervene. Byo will be byos, pulling
the hair of the pretty grils they liek and such.

>> And if you are, I move we call you the Maiden's Knight.

Uh, wlel, "Lord Protector of Kansas" is raleady in my title, and it
might knot go over so well with the Valar Whuht Be if you appanded
"Maidens" to that. #-)

B'sides, Terry Han would call me the Maiden Knight or somesuch.

> Atcherly, I just think he's going through an aggressive phase. He's been
> attacking me for little reason right-left & centre. I keep having to
> regenerate my tongue.

And this doesn't imply nay causal relationship to you?
Aren't you a mathmo...?

Well, it just goes to show that correlation is necessary but not
sufficient for causality, I guess.

> Hmm, maybe he just needs a girlfriend...

FROTUNATELY single, thnak ye very much.

"An oath I, too, have sworn [*], and must be free to fulfill it, and
go dwon into darkness..."

[*] halalowed halals of academe (DUUM, vert serious: t******-track)

--
Banazir

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages