Study these pertinent webpages:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=VO9N9AF137253.7665046296%40anonymous.poster
http://earthfiles.com/earth310.htm
http://www.earthfiles.com/earth303.htm
http://www.bearfabrique.org/floods/mfloods.html
http://www.bearfabrique.org/floods/ice.html
http://all-ez.com/cayce.htm
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011206/sc/cuba_discovery_dc_1.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/585475/posts
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-piri-reis-big.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-piri-reis-redraw.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-o-f.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-mercator.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-buache.jpg
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/2minsurface/
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/2minsurface/1350/45N090W.jpg
ADC's recent discovery of this huge antediluvian city
off the western tip of Cuba has proven the following:
1) Edgar Cayce's psychic readings are vastly more
accurate than the orthodox have been willing to
accept. This transcends Cayce's readings to like-
wise reliable prophecies both ancient and modern;
extant myths of the worldwide flood which Cayce
dates circa 28,000 BC, that is 30,000 years BPE.
That's right. Noah lived 30,000 years ago. Yes,
that means the orthodox are dead in the water,
d.o.a., r.i.p., diis manibus 1/2 a mile down...
making the dead/salt sea look like Mt. Everest!
This means that the city off the Cuban coast
is no less than 30,000 years old at present.
This demonstrates once and for all that the
prehistoric world known to myth as Atlantis
did in fact exist, and Edgar Cayce's psychic
readings on Atlantis have earned their place
as the number one most accurate and reliable
records on prehistory available to the world
(before the hall of records & akasic records).
2) Adverse, oft-vulgar (even criminal!) reactions
of the orthodox are predictable. They're going
through stages of grief right now, since it is
become obvious to the world that this city at
a ~1/2 mile depth under the world's sealevel
was built and developed on dry land. This is
wholly incontrovertible absolutely conclusive
evidence that the world-wide flood is a fact,
and did in fact occur very long ago, and did
in fact occur well-after humans had developed
sophisticated architecture, and construction
so advanced it can not be duplicated today,
as with the Great Pyramid et al prehistoric
structures which are found across the globe.
3) In summary, this sunken city 1/2 a mile deep
proves that all the mountains of evidence for
prehistoric high-cultures are simply too much
for the orthodoxy to deceptively "debunk" any
longer. Cayce was right, and the rest of you
are just playing "catch-ups"...it's over for
the orthodox! Their books are lies frae end-
to-end. Their universities are no better off.
Those who've spent their careers "debunking"
ad nauseam have much to fear from the Truth:
Judeo tremendus, by their works good & evil
in the balance of Venus, perfectly exacting.
Happy Roman New Year (a happy new year indeed)!
Daniel Joseph Min
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPDM2v5ljD7YrHM/nEQKAxwCdFi6vyyD+6gCEjz7R8sxXlnrfJXwAn2Hb
H6kNqlATKV8MUkLGPDtY69Ra
=qYy6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
http://keyserver.pgp.com/pks/lookup?op=get&exact=off&search=Daniel+Joseph+Min
http://web.mit.edu/network/pgp.html
[SNIP]
> ADC's recent discovery of this huge antediluvian city
> off the western tip of Cuba has proven the following:
That Daniel Joseph Min is a wilfully persistent liar.
[SNIP]
M.
I realize that you orthodox are extremely upset
now that this immense prehistoric city has been
discovered 2200' below the ocean!! Thereby your
long-since defunct sin-stitutions of debunkery
are dead in the water, Diis Manibus under ~1/2
mile of ocean. Obviously you have much to fear.
Happy Roman New Year!
Daniel Joseph Min
"Martin Stower" projected:
>But first, on 2 Jan 2002, Plut...@des.I0.VIS, I, Daniel, did write:
>
>>Study these pertinent webpages:
>>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=VO9N9AF137253.7665046296%40anonymous.poster
>>http://earthfiles.com/earth310.htm
>>http://www.earthfiles.com/earth303.htm
>>http://www.bearfabrique.org/floods/mfloods.html
>>http://www.bearfabrique.org/floods/ice.html
>>http://all-ez.com/cayce.htm
>>http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011206/sc/cuba_discovery_dc_1.html
>>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/585475/posts
>>http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-piri-reis-big.jpg
>>http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-piri-reis-redraw.jpg
>>http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-o-f.jpg
>>http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-mercator.jpg
>>http://www.geocities.com/Area51/6683/map-buache.jpg
>>http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/2minsurface/
>>http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/2minsurface/1350/45N090W.jpg
>>
>> ADC's recent discovery of this huge antediluvian city
>> off the western tip of Cuba has proven the following:
>
>That Daniel Joseph Min is a wilfully persistent liar.
>
>M.
>
"There are no atheists in the foxholes of Bataan."
--General Douglas MacArthur (1880-1964)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPDNLE5ljD7YrHM/nEQLc7ACgxDsQID1DDylLbHY6wG9rEJIhNoQAnjzg
hsc2sNIYE+1AO1t/eYb1pYp0
=M5yO
Seeing that the 'discoverers' of this 'city' are loth to claim it as
such do we take it from your post that you are going to produce evidence
to back up your claims?
Or, as usual, when the reports come in that there is nothing that can be
construed as manmade you will, as usual, disappear with a plethora of
halfwitted posts?
And that depth keeps changing all the time. Does this accord with the
levity of the subject?
Confirming your subhuman inability (or brazenly wilful refusal) to exercise even
elementary honesty in this case, even about the claims of the supposed
discoverers - let alone your own obvious status as a propagandist for more than
one lacklustre orthodoxy.
M.
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>Study these pertinent webpages:
SNIP SNIP
>ADC's recent discovery of this huge antediluvian city
>off the western tip of Cuba has proven the following:
snip snip
****************************
You have greatly altered what was stated.
The people finding the site do NOT, repeat, do NOT make the
claims you are claiming.
In addition, why is the depth changing?
Kindly provide documentation, not WebPages, for your claim.
---Mac