Neurophone patents and info, FYI

[Allen L. Barker]

Neurophone patents:

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3647970.WKU.&OS=PN/3647970&RS=PN/3647970
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3393279.WKU.&OS=PN/3393279&RS=PN/3393279

Some published research on it:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=4383726&dopt=Abstract

Some other references are listed on this page:

http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/mind_control/mind9.html

--
Mind Control: TT&P ==> http://www.datafilter.com/mc
Home page: http://www.datafilter.com/alb
Allen Barker

[E]

Do you think the Neurophone has
positive applications?
For example, to drown out the
subliminal messages
or to "jam" them.
It seems applicable as a
deterrent for this
sort of abuse.
While your brain is busy
focusing on self induced
inner sound,
the harrasment sounds
are rejected.
BTW, I plan on buying one

E
"Allen L. Barker" <a...@datafilter.com> wrote in message
news:SwAvb.12495$Rk5....@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...

[Allen L. Barker]

That is an interesting possibility. If you buy one, please
do report back on it to this group as far as its subjective
effects. That includes any perceived jamming effectiveness
against subliminals.