I am having a hard time reading Michael Vickery's critique on Shawcross. I find Michael Vickery's arguments are fueled by paranoia, emotion, and rage, and unscholarly in content. Is Vickery adept at mental telepathy by stating
the intentions of Shawcross writing his book were to down play his enemies and
amusing his friends. Mr. Vickery, please show us some class.