Best Second best
Third Best Fourth Best
1 - 2: 13/11, 6/5 (0.024) 24/23, 13/11 (-0.017)
13/10 (-0.057) 24/21 (-0.058)
1 - 3: 8/5, 6/5 (0.235) 24/23, 13/10 (-0.232)
13/10, 6/5 (-0.233) 13/9 (-0.248)
1 - 4: 24/23, 13/9 (0.009) 13/9, 6/5 (-0.014)
13/8 (-0.052) 24/20, 24/23 (-0.060)
1 - 5: 24/23, 13/8 (0.012) 13/8, 6/5 (-0.013)
24/18 (0.035) 13/7 (-0.81)
1 - 6: 13/7, 8/7 (0.144) 24/23, 13/7 (-0.184)
24/18, 24/23 (-0.191) 13/7, 6/5, (-0.214)
2 - 1:
2 - 3: 24/21, 13/11 (0.013) 13/10, 13/11 (-0.005)
24/22, 13/10 (-0.012) 13/10, 6/4 (-0.042)
2 - 4: 8/4, 6/4 (0.169) 13/9, 13/11 (-0.153)
24/22, 13/9 (-0162) 24/20, 13/11 (-0163)
2 - 5: 24/22, 13/8 (0.001) 13/8, 13/11 (-0.004)
13/8, 6/4 (-0.032) 13/6 (-0.095)
2 - 6: 24/18, 13/11 (0.032) 24/16 (-0.021)
13/5 (-0.046) 24/18, 24/22 (-0.079)
3 - 1:
3 - 2:
3 - 4: 13/9, 13/10 (0.028) 24/21, 13/9 (-0.017)
24/20, 13/10 (-0.019) 24/20, 24/21 (-0.052)
3 - 5: 8/3, 6/3 (0.088) 24/21, 13/8 (-0.049)
24/16 (-0.077) 13/8, 13/10 (-0.086)
3 - 6: 24/18, 13/10 (0.020) 24/15 (-0.012)
24/21, 13/7 (-0.053) 13/4 (-0.054)
4 - 1:
4 - 2:
4 - 3:
4 - 5: 24/20, 13/8 (0.030) 13/8, 13/9 (-0.012)
24/15 (-0.021) 13/4 (-0.063)
4 - 6: 24/18, 13/9 (0.012) 24/14 (-0.001)
8/2, 6/2 (-0.019) 24/20, 13/7 (-0.063)
5 - 1:
5 - 2:
5 - 3:
5 - 4:
5 - 6: 24/13 (0.083) 24/18, 13/8 (-0.042)
13/7, 13/8 (-0.140) 13/2 (-0.218)
6 - 1:
6 - 2:
6 - 3:
6 - 4:
6 - 5:
Rollout settings: Snowie 4.1
Truncated rollout, depth 9
250 games (equiv. 78237 games),
played 3-ply
seed 1, with race database.
Thanks Rene.
Surely though the results for 13/7 and the 1-3 plays besides 8/5
6/5 are misprints.
,Bob Koca
Ooh, You beat my boyfriend (HFB) on Dailygammon. I watched that game.
Zengirl.
I'm not sure about the 13/7, but it's really hard for me to believe that
13/10, 6/5 is that much worse than 13/11, 6/5. I can certainly believe
it's worse, but not that much worse. Especially not that much worse
than 13/9, 6/5. What would be the reason that a builder on 9 and 11
with the slot are within .04, yet one on 10 is .2 worse than either?
That makes no sense.
Or do those minuses mean how much equity is given up to the correct
play, rather than absolute equity?
If that's the case, I could these being correct.
Michael
My best guess is that part of the time he posted the differential between
the two plays instead of the absolute equity.
Here's the absolute cubeful equities I show (at 3-ply) for 31:
8/5 6/5 0.223
13/10 6/5 -0.006
24/23 13/10 -0.013
13/9 -0.024
the 13/7 should likely be -0.081 (I show -0.078).
Gregg C.
Or do those minuses mean how much equity is given up to the correct
> > play, rather than absolute equity?
YES.
About 4 days non stop on pentium 4 3GHz