[comp.os.linux.advocacy] FAQ and Primer for COLA, Edition III
mjcr
Posting-Frequency: weekly
Copyright: (c) 2002 The FAQ and Primer for COLA Team -- All Rights Reserved
Frequently Asked Questions and Primer for comp.os.linux.advocacy
Edition III
April 19, 2002
+-------------------------------------------------+
| Beware of those who would call you a friend for |
| many will eat your bread while working against |
| you. They will take credit for your good works |
| and blame you for their own misdeeds. |
| - TheGreat Unknown |
+-------------------------------------------------+
Contents
* 1 Introduction
* 1.1 Availability
* 1.2 Welcome to comp.os.linux.advocacy
* 1.3 Contributing to this FAQ and Primer
* 1.4 The Charter of comp.os.linux.advocacy
* 2 COLA
* 2.1 On Topic Subjects
* 2.2 Kinds of People Who Read and Post to COLA
* 2.2.1 Linux Advocates
* 2.2.2 Ordinary User
* 2.2.3 Sysadmin
* 2.2.4 Anti-Linux Propagandists
* 2.2.5 Wintroll and Winvocate
* 2.3 Conduct Acceptable in COLA
* 3 Linux
* 3.1 The Kernel
* 3.2 Doesn't Linux "turn back the clock?"
* 3.3 The Linux way of software development
* 3.4 Linux is Good
* 3.5 Intrusive Suggestions for Changing Linux
* 3.6 Wanting to Spread Linux to Everyone
* 3.7 Benefits of the Command Line Interface
* 3.8 Linux's Success is Not Prevented by Microsoft
* 3.8.1 Linux is Successful
* 3.8.2 Linux Does Not Have to be More Like Windows
* 3.8.3 Linux Stability
* 3.8.4 Linux Dependability
* 3.8.5 Linux Flexibility
* 3.8.6 Longevity
* 3.8.7 Linux supported hardware
* 3.9 Linux's Compatibility With Other Operating System
* 3.9.1 Compatible With Windows
* 3.9.2 Compatible With *DOS
* 3.9.3 Compatible With MacOS
* 3.9.4 Compatible With NetWare
* 3.9.5 Compatible With Other Unixes
* 3.9.6 Compatible With Other Operating Systems
* 3.10 Linux Leaves Users Wanting Less
* 3.11 Linux Provides Modern Operating System Features
* 3.11.1 Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks
* 3.11.2 Logical Volume Manager
* 3.11.3 Journaling Filesystems
* 3.11.4 Sparse Files
* 3.11.5 Disk Fragmentation
* 3.11.6 Symmetric multi-processing
* 3.11.7 Clusters
* 3.11.8 Graphical User Interface
* 3.11.9 Networking
* 3.12 Cost of Linux and Where Can it be Obtained
* 3.12.1 Downloading Linux is not Software Piracy
* 3.12.2 Purchasing Linux
* 3.12.3 Linux Distributions.
* 3.12.4 Distributions are not the Same
* 3.12.5 How Many Times a Copy of Linux Can be Installed.
* 3.12.6 You Don't Need a Distribution
* 3.13 Linux Software
* 4 Who uses Linux
* 4.1 Businesses who use Linux
* 4.2 These Governments and Agencies use Linux
* 4.3 Schools, Colleges and Universities
* 4.4 Sources of information
* 4.5 Charitable Organizations
* 4.6 Why Amateur Radio Operators use Linux
* 4.7 Types of new Linux users drawn to Linux
* 5 Linux Documentation and Resources
* 5.1 Internal
* 5.2 man and info
* 5.3 Developer Provided Documentation
* 5.4 Linux Documentation Project
* 5.5 Online Magazine Articles
* 5.6 Mailing Lists
* 5.7 Newsgroups
* 5.8 The Web
* 5.9 Internet Relay Chat
* 5.10 File Transfer Protocol
* 5.11 Online Radio Shows
* 5.12 The Source
* 6 Contributing to the Linux Community
* 6.1 There are Many Reasons to Contribute
* 6.2 It is Not Crazy to Contribute
* 7 Anti-Linux Propagandists and Trolls
* 7.1 Disinformation
* 7.2 FUD
* 7.3 A Common FUD of the Anti-Linux Propagandists
* 7.4 The Effect of the Trespassers
* 7.4.1 Effect on Readers of COLA
* 7.4.2 Effect Upon Posters
* 7.4.3 Effect of the X-No-Archive header
* 7.5 Where the Disrupters Should Go
* 7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics
* 7.7 Methods to Counter Disinformation
* 7.7.1 Use of Trespasser Disinformation Tactics List
* 7.7.2 Refute Disinformation Where Possible
* 7.7.3 Stay On Topic
* 7.7.4 What Have they Contributed to Linux
* 7.7.5 Use Your Newsreader Scoring and Killfile Features
* 8 Linux's BSD cousins.
* 9 Credits
* 9.1 Friends of COLA and this Project
* 10 Pesky Details
1 Introduction
This is the FAQ for the comp.os.linux.advocacy newsgroup and a primer for
new readers of this newsgroup, providing information about this newsgroup
and the Linux community as a whole.
1.1 Availability
This document is posted on a weekly to the comp.os.linux.advocacy,
comp.answers, and news.answers newsgroups. In addition it is archived at
rtfm.mit.edu ftp archive and its mirrors and is also available on the
Internet FAQ Consortium's website at www.faqs.org.
1.2 Welcome to comp.os.linux.advocacy
If you are new to Linux and/or comp.os.linux.advocacy, welcome. It is
hoped that you will will enjoy your time in comp.os.linux.advocacy and
find it educational. We also hope that you will find Linux as useful for
you. and that in the ripeness of time that you will become a contributing
member of the Linux community.
COLA is like a meeting hall for Linux advocacy. A place where those who
advocate the use of Linux can meet and discuss all things Linux. In
addition it is a place were individuals interested in Linux can come to
gain an understanding of the Linux and the Linux community and to learn
about the capabilities of Linux from those who are experienced with the
use, administration, and development of Linux.
By using Linux as a user or sysadmin you are a member of the Linux
community of which this newsgroup is an asset. The Linux community is
world-wide and interconnected by the internet and other networks gated to
the internet.
The description that your news server delivers to you for
comp.os.linux.advocacy, or COLA for short, is "Benefits of Linux compared
to other operating systems". That description is derived from the charter
of COLA. Sometimes advocacy groups are viewed as a place where the
bickering undesirables of other newsgroups are directed, in order to
remove a disruption from another group on the same general subject. That
is incorrect for COLA.
1.3 Contributing to this FAQ and Primer
All those who advocate the use of Linux are invited to submit material and
suggestions to be considered for future versions of this document.
Submissions should be sent by email to mj...@mindspring.com. You may also
post your submissions in COLA; however, in that case you should still
email your submission as well, so that the submission will not be missed
as can happen if it were posted in COLA only.
Submissions offered by those who may deemed to be hostile to Linux,
including but not limited to anti-Linux propagandists, will not be
accepted.
1.4 The Charter of comp.os.linux.advocacy
The charter of comp.os.linux.advocacy is:
For discussion of the benefits of Linux compared to other operating
systems.
That single sentence is the one and only charter of the newsgroup
comp.os.linux.advocacy. The newsgroup's charter is for the newsgroup as a
place for supporters of Linux to gather to discuss Linux, for the
betterment of the Linux community and the promotion and development of
Linux. It supports this as a place for those who would like to learn more
about Linux to come to learn from those who know Linux. It does not call
for it to be a place where the anti-Linux propagandists to gather in order
to discredit Linux.
You may have heard of another charter sometimes called by some the
"original charter," that opens the newsgroup to the abuses that are
inflicted on Linux by those who oppose Linux. That other charter never
existed, it was a proposed charter for another newsgroup that never was
created that would also have been called comp.os.linux.advocacy.
On 14 Feb 1994, Danny Gould dgo...@helix.nih.gov posted
comp.os.linux...@uunet.uu.net a Request for Discussion entitled
"Request for Discussion (RFD) on comp.os.linux.advocacy" to the
news.groups newsgroup. That RFD was cross posted to the appropriate
newsgroups and a number of other inappropriate newsgroups as well. It
included the following proposed charter:
The proposed group will provide a forum for the discussion of Linux. In
addition, it will allow comp.os.linux.misc to deal with Linux-specific
issues. Discussion will include (but not be limited to) the discussion
of the pros and cons of Linux and applications for Linux, and the
comparison of Linux with other operating systems and environments such
as Microsoft DOS and Windows, SCO UNIX, Coherent, NeXTstep, Macintosh
System, etc. It will be an unmoderated forum.
The call for votes on the proposal was not posted, the issue died without
a vote.
On 4 Oct 1994, Dave Sill d...@ornl.gov posted 37mn57$d...@rodan.UU.NET a
Request for Discussion entitled "REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
comp.os.linux reorganization." Thus far comp.os.linux.advocacy was not yet
proposed. Note that unlike Danny, Dave posted the Request for Discussions
to appropriate newsgroups only, that is a hallmark of a serious effort.
On 14 Oct 1994, Dave Sill d...@de5.ornl.gov posted 37mn57$d...@rodan.UU.NET
a revised version of this Request for Discussion, this revised posting
called for the creation of comp.os.linux.advocacy among other
comp.os.linux.* groups. Dave proposed this charter for
comp.os.linux.advocacy:
For discussion of the benefits of Linux compared to other operating
systems.
The Call for Votes went out in the required form, and on 13 Dec 1994
posted the results ikl...@amdahl.com with greater than 8 to 1 in favor of
the creation of comp.os.linux.advocacy (our COLA) with Dave's proposed
charter. On that date, that charter became effective and that other
charter that was proposed for the other comp.os.linux.advocacy that never
was created, never became anything that affects this
comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Those who oppose Linux and have invaded comp.os.linux.advocacy in order to
try to subvert the purpose of this newsgroup will continue as they have to
insult the intelligence of the Linux advocates by citing that other
proposed charter of that other newsgroup that never came into existence.
They also have continued to quote from the introductory paragraph of the
Danny's Request for Discussion as though that were a part of any actual or
even a part of the failed, proposed charter. Perhaps they feel that the
introductory section provides them with a greater impact.
When someone posts citations from that failed Request for Discussion in
order to make it appear that the anti-Linux propagandists are sanctioned
to be posting in COLA, as was done by an anti-Linux propagandist on
January 13, 2002 in article pMr08.457$Wf1.3...@ruti.visi.com, then once
again by another anti-Linux propagandist on February 13, 2002 in article
d6761fb5.02021...@posting.google.com they are not only using
disinformation they are also insulting the intelligence of everyone who is
a reader COLA.
2 COLA
2.1 On Topic Subjects
On-topic is anything anything regarding Linux that is of interest to a
person who advocates the use of Linux, or requests for information about
Linux by a person who would like to learn about it. COLA is also a great
place to share your Linux success stories.
COLA is not a place to advocate the use of other operating systems, there
are other newsgroups for advocating them. COLA is not a place to vent real
or imagined complaints regarding Linux. There are other newsgroups created
for that purpose.
COLA is not a place to post advertisements or other promotions for
financial gain or for promoting anything other than the use of Linux
operating system and growth of the Linux community.
2.2 Kinds of People Who Read and Post to COLA
While reading articles in COLA you will often see references to various
types of people. To someone new to COLA, these classification may be
confusing.
2.2.1 Linux Advocates
A Linux advocate is a person who advocates the use of Linux. They are
those who enjoys sharing the experiences they have had with Linux. These
experiences range from an easy first-time install through regular
day-to-day experiences, all the way to solving thorny or uncommon
technical issues by using Linux.
Linux advocates may from time to time offer assistance to persons who ask
for technical support within COLA. Many of the Linux advocates of COLA
find offering such assistance difficult to resist and many the those
advocates are also the same persons who provide such support through other
channels. However, technical support is not part of the official chartered
purpose of COLA so someone requesting technical support will more often
than not be redirected to other Linux support channels.
2.2.2 Ordinary User
A user of Linux that does not have superuser access. When you login into
Linux using your personal account, you are an ordinary user. When a person
who is a sysadmin logs into his personal account, he is an ordinary user
as well.
2.2.3 Sysadmin
The term "sysadmin" is a contraction of "system administrator." This is
the traditional title used for the person responsible for the operations
of a unix computer. In general, that is the person who knows the superuser
account password. That superuser account is used for system maintenance.
As the superuser a person is granted more privileges than the other users,
but only when using the superuser account. For normal work the sysadmin
should use his own personal account and become the superuser only when
needed. The most common name for that account is "root", but it can be
anything. The superuser account is distinguished by its user
identification number, which is always 0.
2.2.4 Anti-Linux Propagandists
Anti-Linux Propagandists are those who regularly post argumentative,
insulting, distracting, untrue, and generally unpleasant articles to COLA
containing propaganda designed slow and even prevent to acceptance of
Linux by the general computing public. For more information see Anti-Linux
Propagandists and Trolls.
2.2.5 Wintroll and Winvocate
The term "wintroll" and "winvocate" have commonly used in COLA to to refer
to anti-Linux propagandists who champion Windows. Wintroll are the ones
who appear to behave at a lower level of sophistication than the
winvocate. Winvocate is someone who would be considered a true Windows
advocate, if they were to post in an appropriate Windows advocacy
newsgroup rather than posting off-topic in COLA.
2.3 Conduct Acceptable in COLA
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3 Linux
Linux is an operating system based on the unix class of operating systems.
It can be argued that Linux is the kernel of the operating system;
however, in common usage the word Linux is used to refer to entire
operating system as a whole, an operating system comprised of the kernel,
systems utility software, user utility software and to a lesser extent the
applications software. This is the practice that will be followed in this
document. Specific instances of this from given vendors are referred to as
Linux Distributions.
Linux as stated above, is based on unix, but is not legally a clone of the
unix operating system. On the other hand it looks like unix, behaves like
unix, feels like unix enough to functionally be considered a unix. Linux
is more compatible with both major classes of unix, BSD and AT&T, than
they are with each other. Linux fully operates with with the other unixes
as an equal peer via networking.
Linux runs software compatible with those other unixes and in most cases
the very same software does run on each of those unixes and Linux as well.
Where the other unixes have deviated from each other with various
utilities or services, Linux typically supports both of their styles of
utilities. Often Linux is more compatible with the various unixes, than
they are with each other.
Linus Torvalds started developing Linux from scratch as a better unix than
than the Minix that was then available. Minix is a contraction of Minimal
Unix, and is the name of a very minimal unix that was licensed for
educational purposes. The name Linux is in turn a contraction of Linus's
Minix, although the actual results of Linus's early releases had already
so far out classed Minix so that Linus's Unix would have been a better
base to form the contraction Linux.
One of the major goals of creating Linux was to create a unix that was
free from the encumbrances of existing unixes and the licensing that
restricted the use of Minix. So it was necessary to write the Linux kernel
from scratch.
The Linux operating system provides all the features that users and
administrators should expect from any modern, high-performance operating
system. Many of these features have been a part of Linux and stable for
years. While the developers of various, so-called popular operating
systems claim to be innovating, they are only playing catch up with Linux.
As this document is being written, Linux is increasing its lead with the
development on the 2.5.x series developmental/experimental kernels.
3.1 The Kernel
The Kernel is the core of the operating system. That is the part that
communicates with devices, handles memory management, schedules processes,
and provides other basic services to the systems utility software, user
utility software and applications software. Thanks to the fact that the
kernel handles the hardware and provides a uniform view of it to higher
level software, regardless of your hardware platform, Linux will present
the user with a uniform environment. That means that once you as a user of
Linux learn to run it on a PC, or a Mac, or a minicomputer, or a mainframe
computer you will be able to sit down to use Linux on any other of the
supported platforms, and feel right at home. The hardware may look and
feel different such as a different key layout or a different pointing
device, but Linux knowledge is portable across hardware platforms. Members
of the team that produced this document can attest to this, through their
first hand experience on multiple hardware platforms running Linux.
Many versions of the Linux kernel have been released, in fact since the
release of the Linux kernel version 1.0.0 in there have been over 600
official main line kernels released, including the AC series of Linux
kernels there have been almost 900 releases in that time. The reason for
so many releases has to do with the development of the kernel being an
open process, this way you don't have to wait for months or years for a
needed patch to be provided or for a feature that you really need to be
made available.
3.2 Doesn't Linux "turn back the clock?"
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.3 The Linux way of software development
Some think that we must maximize our user base at all costs, to include
all potential users. This is a pitfall of the commercial programming mind
set, which leads to kitchen sink programming, where you have a little
something for everyone and a lot of nothing for anyone, with a product
that fails to fully serve anyone's needs. That is not the the Linux way to
develop software.
Software development with Linux is, as it should be, about creating a
program that suits its users' needs perfectly. If that program is a text
editor and your editor serves the needs of 100 people and it pleases them
completely, then you have achieved complete success. Don't worry about
somehow getting the rest of the Linux community to use your editor, other
editors serve their needs better. If they do find that your editor serves
them better, many will switch away from their other editors in favor of
yours. Then there is nothing wrong with using multiple editors for
different tasks. They could use your editor for some tasks they they think
it is suited for and other editors for other tasks that they think those
other editors are best suited for. There is nothing wrong with that
either, that is freedom of choice in action and that is the Linux way.
You will have more satisfaction for your development efforts by having a
smaller user base comprised of users who are absolutely pleased with the
software that you have created, than with a user base of tens of millions
of users who can barely tolerate what you have developed, with not one of
them being truly pleased with it.
There is some software that runs on Linux that has fallen into the kitchen
sink programming trap. These programs are conspicuous because they are the
exceptions to the rule.
There is a developing commercial software market for Linux; Let us hope
that those developers learn the Linux way, and do not fall into the trap
of believing that they must each try to capture the marketplace to the
exclusion of all others. But if they do fall into that trap, there will
still be the programmers who do know the Linux way, and users who
appreciate that way. Those companies who fall into the same old trap that
has dominated a sizable portion of the computer marketplace of the 1980's
and the 1990's, will find their efforts thwarted by the Linux way.
Due to the freedom of choice that is a keystone of Linux, let each user
choose the programs that suit their needs best.
3.4 Linux is Good
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.5 Intrusive Suggestions for Changing Linux
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.6 Wanting to Spread Linux to Everyone
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.7 Benefits of the Command Line Interface
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.8 Linux's Success is Not Prevented by Microsoft
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.8.1 Linux is Successful
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.8.2 Linux Does Not Have to be More Like Windows
A common question asked by some is, "Why is Linux so much like unix and so
different than Windows?". The answer is simply, Linux does not have to be
more like Windows. Linux only has to be like Linux (and unix). Why is
Linux so much like Unix? Because that is what it was designed to be from
the beginning of its development.
If you want a Windows (pick your favorite version of Windows) clone
operating system that is as free reliable, and stable as Linux, then Linux
may not be for you. Freedows or Freemen Windows would be better operating
systems for you.
Both the Freedows OS Project and Freemen Windows are a projects to create
free and stable operating systems that are clones of Windows. It is true
that neither of these projects have not yet produced a single release nor
have they released any files yet. You should look into them at
sourceforge.net/projects/freemenos and sourceforge.net/projects/freedows,
contact their development teams and offer your services to help with their
development. That way everyone will be much more happy.
3.8.3 Linux Stability
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.8.4 Linux Dependability
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.8.5 Linux Flexibility
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.8.6 Longevity
Free software has a characteristic that proprietary software
lacks-longevity.
In the early 1990's PC class computers were sold with the MS-DOS operating
system and often with Microsoft Works. Both have since either died, or
changed into programs unrecognizable from their origins. DOS exists only
as a command prompt in Windows and OS/2-except for the open source
FreeDOS. Works exists only as a Windows product that uses Microsoft Word
for word processing. Its file formats are completely foreign to Works'
original file formats. The way users interact with these programs has also
changed-the feature sets have changed dramatically (which can be seen as
both good and bad). There are hundreds, maybe thousands, of programs that
are no longer available. Some of those programs were once the kings of the
desktop. WordStar is one example.
In the free software world useful programs tend to last a very long time.
Emacs, has been around for at least 20 years. Unix, whether in free or
proprietary incarnations, has been around since 1969. The C language has
been around for nearly as long-it was created specifically to enable
porting Unix to different hardware platforms (not that these are
revelations for the COLA readership-I mention them only as contrasting
examples). The TEXtypesetting system has been around since the 1970's.
These differences in longevity of software have implications for user's
expectations about it-in the effort they are willing to invest in learning
it, and in their trust that the software will be around in five or ten
years.
If many in the Linux community thought Linux and other free software was a
fly-by-night phenomenon, they probably would not invest much time or
energy learning it or advocating its use. But the more that one realizes
that it and its applications are here to stay, the more they are willing
to invest time and energy learning specific pieces of software. Knowing
that what they learn today will continue to be useful to them for years
and decades to come.
Why invest time in an "easy to learn" text editor that might die in a
couple of years or a seemingly more difficult editor that has proved
through longevity and developer support that it will be around for a long
time to come? The first impulse upon starting to use Linux is to pick the
easy editor (such as nedit). They do not want to invest the energy or time
to learn Emacs or Vim. assuming that they would be supplanted by graphical
editors. But then they started longing for better features in their
editors. They could ask the developers to add features, pay someone to add
them, or add those features themselves. But why, when editors with all the
wanted features, and more, are a mouse click away?
And what's the hurry? The software isn't going anywhere. It won't be
outdated next year or the year after. It has proved its utility and
longevity. Even more important in the long run is that this software has a
stable user interface. New features have been and continue to be added
over the years and the pre-existing features are still there. They won't
have to learn a new way to use their computer just because developers
might decide that break dancing provides a better way to interact with
computers or that animated paper clips or some dweeb named Bob make life
easier for new users.
In Linux, some things remain constant-BASH, Emacs, Vim, the core
utilities, and languages for programming and typesetting. New features get
added, graphical interfaces are developed, new programs are born. But the
latest whiz bang hypeware doesn't kill the tried and true work horses that
made the system useful. Marketing doesn't determine a Linus program's
lifetime, feature set, or implementation. Utility and need are the sole
arbiters of a program's life cycle.
There are many who would chomp at the bit to point out that most people
just want to use their computers without having to invest time and energy
learning 20-year-old software. The good news is-they can-even with Linux.
The breadth of command-line, text, and graphical software for doing
everything gives users choices in how to interact with the system. New
users coming from other systems can adapt Linux to their style. There is
no need to learn new ways to do anything. Complete novices can be
productive very quickly thanks to KDE, GNOME, and BASH.
Fortunately, there are many ways to get most things done and Linux
provides an environment that allows gradual accumulation of knowledge and
skill and adapts easily to any working style. And the knowledge and skill
gained over time is not made obsolete by sweeping changes in software
availability, feature sets, or user interfaces.
3.8.7 Linux supported hardware
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.9 Linux's Compatibility With Other Operating System
Linux is compatible at different levels with many other operating systems,
ranging from the networking level all the way to running the same
software.
3.9.1 Compatible With Windows
Linux can run Windows software by running that software under the actual
Windows operating system (requiring a properly licensed copy of Windows)
that is in turn running as a guest operating system in a PC emulator such
as VMware. Linux can also run Windows software on Linux itself with an
implementation of the Windows Application Programming Interface (API) via
Wine. It is also possible to compile the source code for Windows based
software on Linux and link it against the Wine libraries to produce a
Linux executable of that Windows software. One note about Wine, Wine can
only run on PC style hardware, since it is not a PC emulator hardware, and
runs the Windows software directly on the underlying processor.
Linux can provide network printers and act as a fileserver for Windows
computers by running Samba using TCP/IP networking. You can also use
MarsNWE to provide printers and network volumes using IPX/SPX networking.
Linux can also access shares and printers provided by computers running
Windows by the use of Samba and the Samba filesystem. Linux can also be a
file, and print server to Windows clients by using Samba. Linux machines
can access Windows machines that are emulating NetWare file servers by
using the NetWare core protocol filesystem.
Linux can read and write to Windows hard drive partitions that use the
filesystems of MS-DOS and Windows 9x. The NTFS filesystem are a bit
problematic because of their nature and they way their specifications
change from version to version. Linux can read Windows NT, Windows 2000,
and Windows XP NTFS partitions well; however, writing directly to such
partitions is possible but not recommended.
There is an indirect method for Linux to read and write to NTFS
partitions. Running Windows under a PC emulator such as VMware, give that
copy of Windows access to the NTFS partition or partitions and have that
copy of Windows running as a fileserver. Then let Linux access the
fileserver through a virtual or actual network connection.
Linux understands the Windows extensions to the CD-ROM standards. Linux
can both read them and generate them. Linux can also access Windows
diskettes and other disk media, either by mounting them as any other Linux
partition can be mounted, or by the use of the mtools.
3.9.2 Compatible With *DOS
Linux can run DOS (Pick your favorite DOS) software by running that
software under actual DOS (requiring a properly licensed copy of DOS) that
is in turn running as a guest operating system in a PC emulator such as
VMware. An older and popular option for Linux on PC style hardware is to
run DOS software with DOSEmu. DOSEmu is a PC emulator that uses the
underlying Intel style processor to execute programs. With it you will
need a properly licensed copy of actual DOS, such a copy is easy to come
by since contrary to popular belief DOS is not dead. There are commercial
versions of DOS being sold and there is FreeDOS. DOSEmu can also run other
real mode PC software that boot and run independently of any operating
system and depends on PC hardware.
Linux can provide network printers and act as a fileserver for Windows
computers by running Samba using TCP/IP networking. You can also use
MarsNWE to provide printers and network volumes using IPX/SPX networking.
You can also use Linux's as a NFS fileserver and lpr printserver for DOS.
In each case DOS will require the applicable networking client software.
Linux can read and write to DOS hard drive partitions, diskettes and other
disk media, either by mounting them as any other Linux partition can be
mounted, or by the use of the mtools.
3.9.3 Compatible With MacOS
Linux can provide network printers and act as a fileserver for Macintosh
computers. Linux can access Macintosh based print servers and fileserver.
Linux can read and write Macintosh floppies, hard drives, and other disk
media.
3.9.4 Compatible With NetWare
Linux can work in a NetWare based network as a fileserver, a print queue
server or a IPX/SPX router with the use of MarsNWE and the IPX/SPX
networking protocols. With NCP utilities Linux can communicate with other
printer queues as a print server. Linux can also print through a
Novell-style printserver. Linux can be a client in such a network, using
the existing NetWare file and print queue servers. Linux supports the DOS,
Windows, OS/2, and NFS names spaces of NetWare. Linux can access NetWare's
hard drive partitions.
3.9.5 Compatible With Other Unixes
Linux software is Unix software. Some source code many need to be ported
to Linux, but that is no different than moving such a program from one
Unix to another. If the software in question is too low level then it
might require a complete rewrite to run on Linux, but that is the same as
it is between any other two Unixes already. Most other Unixes can also run
programs written for Linux, some of the other Unixes have even started to
support running Linux binaries. Yes, Linux and other Unixes are very
compatible with each other's software.
In all ways that matter, Linux is a Unix, so if the other Unix computers
in the networks are running a version of Unix that is compatible with
normal Unix networking services, Linux will fit right in.
Linux can access the filesystems of a variety of other Unixes, that means
that Linux can read their drives. Linux can access even a variety of those
that do not use the native partitioning scheme that Linux uses on the
given hardware platform that it is running on.
3.9.6 Compatible With Other Operating Systems
Linux can access the floppy drives and hard drives of a variety of other
operating systems. Any operating system that can use TCP/IP, IPX/SPX,
DECnet networking can communicate with or through a Linux host.
3.10 Linux Leaves Users Wanting Less
From them 1950's through the 1970's users would expect their computers to
operate as specified in the manuals and the specification sheets. The POP
manuals (Principal of Operations manuals) and the rest of the
documentation of those computers were considered to be faithful
representations of the operations of those computers.
There was one computer that was installed in 1964, the organization that
owned it decommisioned it in 1984, and wanted to donate it to a college
computer science department but they had lost the installation media of
the machine's operating system. The computer was running twenty-four hours
a day and seven days a week for those twenty years without a single reboot
or any down time. There were components that had failed: individual tape
drives and card readers/punches had worn out and were replaced, CRT
terminals were added and the most of the card readers, the old model 26
keypunch stations and most of the model 29 keypunch stations were retired.
Disk drives were added to that computer years after the initial
installation, None of that needed any downtime or reboots.
In the 1970's there was the development of microprocessors and
microcomputers, most of them matched their operating systems in what ever
form they came in and were as reliable as the computers of the prior
decade. Some of the hardware was problematic but the operating systems
would generally operate as specified.
In the early 1980's something started to change. Today many users have
come to accept and even expect their computers and operating system to
fail frequently, many shops now use regular reboot cycles as an attempt to
use pre-emptive reboots to avoid crashes at unexpected times. They have
come to expect their operating systems and systems software and
applications software to not work as documented. What is even worse, they
often see nothing wrong with that madness. In prior decades, if such
undependability and unreliability were experienced, it would not have not
been acceptable and the vendor would have to replace those useless systems
and often had to pay for the customer's losses as well.
Now flash forward to present day, users have come to expect very little
from their computers. Such poor performance has led them to expect less
and less while wanting more and more with little prospect of getting it.
But in addition to such unreliable operating systems, there is Linux,
leaving its users wanting less and less because it provides more and more
all the time.
* A stable operating system
Linux users no longer want for a stable operating system because Linux
is as stable operating system. Twenty four hours, seven days a week
non-stop operation for years at a time with off the shelf PC hardware
is not anything unusual for Linux. As members of the FAQ and Primer
team can attest to from personal experience.
* An operating system that doesn't require me to spend a fortune on new
hardware.
Linux can run on hardware with just the computing power needed or that
is available. Linux sysadmins upgrade to more powerful hardware to
have more power available for their users, not to regain yesterday's
performance from today's operating system.
* An operating system with a decent graphical user interface.
Or rather one that can be configured to work the way you want it too.
With the look and feel you seek. Linux does not actually have any
graphical user interfaces, but the X Windowing System is commonly run
on Linux and other unixes. There are also other graphical user
interface besides the X Window System that can run on Linux, including
some next generation test bed systems. If a Linux user wishes he can
run today a user interface that won't be available elsewhere for years
or even decades, that is if he likes to live on the bleeding edge.
* An operating system with lots of useful stuff built in.
Much of what a person needs to purchase to get some other operating
systems to be useful comes with the common Linux distributions.
Sometimes in surprising ways, such as the little program named "cat"
that concatenates files and is the more powerful original that the DOS
command "type" was copied from. The program "cat" also provides by
itself much of the functionality of Norton Ghost.
* An operating system that doesn't try to prevent me from using my
computer.
Linux does not second guess or interfere with the human decision
making process. It respects the wisdom of the human sysadmin and the
user. There are utilities available to automate that, but in the end
humans are the bosses. There has been a call for more "Windows like"
automation to take over from human authority, one distribution that
used that philosophy was Corel Linux. It is now a hated distribution
by its own users as a result.
* An OS not prone to viral infections
While in theory no operating system can be 100all worms and viruses,
Linux by is nature is immune enough that the possibilities that such
little beasties exist have become like urban legends in the Linux
community. Even if such infections could target Linux, the
multifaceted code base would in itself limit the spread, if a sysadmin
selects the software to run without regard to distributions and does
not use precompiled binaries, he has just increased the level of
immunity of his systems. The worst an attacking worm could do is crash
a server program, but the worm creator could not actually control
anything with the worm because he could not predict the memory layout
of the program he is attacking on systems so independent from
distributions. That same would generally be true with binaries
supplied from a different distribution or different version than the
one he is targeting.
* An operating system which I can program and hack easily
Anyone can have access to the source code of the Linux kernel and most
if not all the programs they run on Linux. If one is a programmer,
Linux provides all the tools and the source code to add or alter any
feature he pleases. If he wants to write a new program and has
questions, about the operation of the library functions, or the
kernel, he can refer to the documentation, ask for help on-line, or
just read the applicable source code. If he has a device for which he
want to create a driver for, he can write it. If he wants to see how
similar drivers work, there is the Linux kernel source code and the
code of the other drivers available.
* An operating system which doesn't decay over time.
Since the late days of DOS programs and the coming of Window NT and
Windows 95, there has been a pheonoma known as software rot, also
known as bit rot. With late DOS programs it could take an individual
program on a production system out of commission needing to be
reinstalled. Windows 95 and Windows NT elevated the software rot
phenomenon from causing the decay of individual programs to the decay
of the entire operating system. This is not a factor with Linux.
All these items are things that Linux users are not wanting for any
longer, because Linux has given to them what they have been wanting for up
to a decade. So yes, Linux leaves its users wanting less, because it
provides so much more of what they have been hoping for from their prior
operating system.
3.11 Linux Provides Modern Operating System Features
Linux provides the features that have come to be expected from modern
operating systems and features that many other operating system will only
match after years of playing catch up. These features include:
3.11.1 Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks
Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks, or RAID for short, is a method of
combining multiple disk devices or partitions into a single logical disk
device. This can be done to provide more contiguous disk space, although
LVM is a better and more flexible option for that. RAID also provides
fault tolerance for drive failures because the data is stored in redundant
locations across multiple physical drives, if an individual drive fails
the data is not lost. RAID can also increase disk I/O improvements by
spreading the workload across multiple drives, channels, and host
adaptors.
Naturally Linux supports hardware only RAID implementations since in that
case the hardware RAID box presents itself to the drive controller as a
single drive, or if the controller implements the hardware only RAID it
presents its connected drives to the computer as a single drive. Linux
also provides within the kernel a software RAID implementation. The Linux
implementation of software RAID provides support for linear, RAID-0,
RAID-1, RAID-4, and RAID-5.
3.11.2 Logical Volume Manager
Logical Volume Manager is commonly called LVM. Linux provides a Logical
Volume Manager as a modern operating system should. Multiple partitions
and entire drives can be assigned as physical partitions to LVM. LVM
permits you to combine all of the partition and drives assigned to it into
a single virtual drive. You that single combined logical drive can then
allocated to appear to be many partitions, known as logical volumes, or
even one gigantic partition. If one logical volume is running short of
space, you can enlarge it to consume more disk space. You can also reduce
the size of logical volumes that don't need the space assigned to them.
Partitions and drives can be added or removed from LVM control at will
without having any software beyond LVM knowing any difference.
3.11.3 Journaling Filesystems
The stable Linux kernels support two journaling filesystems, The third
extended file system and the reiser filesystem.
3.11.4 Sparse Files
A feature of Linux filesystems design is to support for efficient storage
allocation for sparse files. How much disk space should be allocated for
an uncompressed 10-megabyte file that contains 10-kilobytes of data with
the remainder of the file empty? How about storing that file in
10-megabytes? With the Linux native filesystem this is possible. Assume
that file contains its data in two 5-kilobyte segments, one at the
beginning of the file and one at the end of the file. Assume that the file
was written to disk with a sparse file aware program. That file is stored
in the filesystem as having three fragments, the first and third fragments
are stored on disk as normal, the second fragment is the empty part of the
file so it is allocated no actual disk space. When a program reads from
the empty part of the file, it will to be given by the kernel a block
containing all zero bytes. When a program writes to a part of the empty
fragment that fragment is divided into two or three fragments depending on
the location within it that was written to. The newly written to segment
is in a fragment that is allocated disk space and the other one or two
fragments generated now are allocated no disk space. The result could be a
single file that may be continuous on disk but would be reported as being
very fragmented.
3.11.5 Disk Fragmentation
The Linux Native filesystems such a the Second Extended filesystem, the
Third Extended filesystem, and the Reiser filesystem are all designed to
be resistant to the disk fragmentation that plagues the filesystems of
some other operating systems. In normal use with a typical Linux
installation disk fragmentation levels rarely approach 20unreasonable
expectation. Sparse file handling tends to increase the apparent amount of
disk fragmentation that is reported. So true fragmentation is often
considerably lower than is reported by the various Linux filesystem
utilities.
A Linux disk defragmentation utility does exist. Most Linux sysadmins who
know about the disk defragmentation program don't use it; because disk
fragmentation to serious percentages without the figure being inflated by
the existence of sparse files are rare enough that Linux sysadmins just
don't see a need to defragment their filesystems. Such a utility needs to
be used on an unmounted partition, that would mean that the host, to have
its partitions defragmented, would have to go out of service for the
duration of the procedure, that is seen as being unacceptable by many
sysadmins. Also, defragmenting files can hurt system performance and disk
space availability. The disk defragmentation utility undoes the benefits
of sparse files and if the filesystem is spread across multiple physical
drives defragmentation could move all the allocated file space a single
drive.
Not many in the Linux community even know about the existence of the disk
defragmentation utility. Because of the low rate of fragmentation, and
defrag's inconvenient and possibly detrimental side effects experienced
sysadmin don't feel a need for it and so do not search for it.
Most of those who do want to use that utility are among the new Linux
sysadmins who are still approaching Linux from a DOS/Windows mind set. It
is not recommended, but if you have a special situation and feel you
needed it, you can locate the utility by performing a search for defrag on
www.freshmeat.net using "defrag" for the search key. Note that defrag has
not been maintained since 1997, so it can not handle more recent
developments in Linux filesystems. You have been warned.
3.11.6 Symmetric multi-processing
Linux's Symmetric multi-processing or SMP as it is often called
facilitates the use of all the processors on a computer with multiple
processors. Unlike many other operating systems that support SMP only in
their high end versions, if at all, with Linux any and every installation
can support SMP.
SMP was not even considered before the 2.0.x series of Linux kernels, when
a spin-lock was placed, essentially, around the entire kernel and no
processor switching/activation occurred between system calls.
In 2.2.x series of Linux kernels that was changed so that individual locks
were placed on critical system calls and sometimes were moved to critical
sections of the system call, leaving the before and after sections
available for simultaneous use by another CPU.
The 2.4.x series of Linux kernels has gotten even more fine grained.
Enough so that the scheduler and clock ticking were seen as prominent
bottlenecks.
The development 2.5.x series of Linux kernels already (as of January 2002)
has a scheduler which is at least 10 times as good without any tuning,
which will get over the next few months, and the system and CPU clocks
have been decoupled a great deal, there is even talk of having different
clock speed CPUs in the same system.
This rapid advancement is evidence of what can happen when no contributor
does more than they can easily afford but the efforts of all of them
combined give a push that not even the largest corporations like IBM,
Intel, and Microsoft can hope to match.
3.11.7 Clusters
Linux supports clustering to utilize a number of common off-the-shelf
computers to provide the computational power of even a super computer.
Imagine tying together a number of computers that some other operating
systems would have you consider obsolete, and you have the makings of a
supercomputer.
3.11.8 Graphical User Interface
To be precise, Linux does not have a Graphical User Interface (a GUI).
However there are multiple GUI's that run on Linux. The most popular is
the Xfree86 distribution of the X Window System, also called X windows or
simply X. There is often a call to fully integrate a GUI into the Linux
kernel; that would be highly undesirable for multiple reasons such as
reduced stability and forcing a GUI on to those who do not want or need a
GUI. That would also be locking Linux into supporting that one GUI alone,
thereby locking out the rest. A common argument for full GUI integration
is that X is too ingrained into the Linux community to permit any other
GUI to develop, that argument exposes nothing more a lack of understanding
of the Linux way. The reality of the matter is that other GUIs already
exist. Such as the virtual reality based shell, 3Dsia.
3.11.9 Networking
Linux, as other unixes, has support in the kernel for networking. Linux
supports TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, Appletalk, DECnet, X.25, AX.25 level 2, and unix
domain networking protocols. Linux hosts can operate as single home host,
multi-home hosts, bridges and routers, firewalls, and NAT boxes. Linux can
access non-Linux fileservers and printserver and other network servers.
Linux can serve as a fileserver and a print server using a number of unix
and non-unix protocols.
Besides the common Ethernet network interface, Linux can network via
serial ports with SLIP and PPP, performing either as a dialup client, or a
dialup server. For an organization that needs to provide TCP/IP networking
access for their workers, member, and clients and does not want the
traffic to cross the internet, a Linux computer with a number of modems
serving as a dialup server is a perfect solution. Linux also uses parallel
ports for networking with the PLIP driver.
3.12 Cost of Linux and Where Can it be Obtained
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.12.1 Downloading Linux is not Software Piracy
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.12.2 Purchasing Linux
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.12.3 Linux Distributions.
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.12.4 Distributions are not the Same
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.12.5 How Many Times a Copy of Linux Can be Installed.
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.12.6 You Don't Need a Distribution
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
3.13 Linux Software
There is very little Linux specific software, that is software that can
only run on Linux, but there is a great variety of software that is
available for Linux. Much of the software for Linux is the standard unix
fare that will be familiar to anyone who has used any unix. There is also
much software written for Linux that will compile and run on other
platforms as well. To see a partial list of the software available for
Linux, go to the Freshmeat website at www.freshmeat.net activate the
browse link, and start looking around.
4 Who uses Linux
All those sysadmin and computer users who have it installed are working on
a computer on which Linux is installed. That includes individuals, room
mates, families, clubs, schools, charitable organizations, small
businesses, corporations, government agencies, and governments.
4.1 Businesses who use Linux
* 58k.com, Inc
* Advance Packaging Corporation
* Affordable Computers
* Amazon.com
* Bertelsmann Foundation
* Bharti Telesoft Limited
* BRW, Inc.
* Borders
* Cameraman Photos & Video
* Credit Suisse First Boston
* Citywebsites
* Computer & Communication GmbH
* Crisis Prevention Institute
* e-smith, inc
* Erol's Internet Services
* GKN Westland Aerospace Ltd
* Google.com
* Harbor Capital Advisors, Inc.
* Hewlett Packard
* Intekk Communications
* Koch Industries, Inc.
* Marconi Aerospace - a divison of GEC Marconi
* Merrill Lynch & Co.
* Meyer Tool, Inc.
* NBM Technologies
* New Star Service Co.
* New York Stock Exchange
* PC & Web Xperience, Inc
* REDE-RS - Internet provider network
* Replay Media
* Robert Reford
* Shell Oil Exploration
* The Astrolog
* The Strand Companies
* Tier 3 Solutions
* TRW
4.2 These Governments and Agencies use Linux
* Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority
* Fermi National Laboratory
* Los Alamos National Laboratory
* National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
* Oak Ridge National Laboratory
* Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
* Sandia National Laboratories
* National Areonautics and Space Administration
4.3 Schools, Colleges and Universities
* Auckland University
* St. Mary's Catholic School (Rockledge, Florida)
* Seton Hill College
* Staffordshire University
* University of British Colombia
* University of California at Berkeley
* University of California at San Francisco
* University of Columbia
* University of Notre Dame
* University of Macedonia
* University of Waterloo
4.4 Sources of information
* www.forbes.com/home/2002/03/27/0327linux.html
* www.netcraft.com
* www.linux-mandrake.com/bizcase
* www.copyleft.co.nz/should.html
* Message-ID: <33551C...@ericsson.com>
* www.li.org/success
* www.linuxmall.com/?0,6,3
* www.stmarys-school.org
* dot.kde.org/1015251670
4.5 Charitable Organizations
Linux is perfect for the needs of many schools and charitable
institutions. When a company using PC hardware finds that is hardware is
"too weak" to support the latest release of Windows and Windows based
program, or at least does not support them productively; they will often
replace that hardware and donate their older hardware to charitable
institutions. That leads to a problem for the charitable institutions,
because Microsoft does not permit the transfer of the licenses for the
older version of Windows that the hardware runs from the company to the
charitable institutions. The charitable institutions can then find it
difficult to find copies of Windows that will run on that hardware; for
the same reason that the company considered that hardware useless tends to
lead the charitable institutions to the same conclusion.
What can the charitable institutions do? Install Linux, and that hardware
would be productive. If that organization is short of funds, a single
purchase of a Linux distribution is the most it should take to run most of
the 386+ PC hardware they have. What if they have 80286, or 8086/8088
based hardware? They can be turned into telnet based terminals to provide
access to their other computers that are running Linux or other unix
operating systems. The software to do this is also free. They would need a
copy of pctelnet (freeware), a copy of of DOS, if they do not have it,
they can get a copy of FreeDOS (it is free), and a network packet driver,
this driver could be provided by their network interface card
manufacturer, or they could use one of the standard and free packet
drivers, that have been time tested and stable.
4.6 Why Amateur Radio Operators use Linux
Yes, this is true. More and more amateur radio operators (usually referred
to as 'hams') are making the switch to Linux. This kind of comes under
'specialized things you can do with Linux that are really cool'.
There are many reasons for the use of Linux in the amateur community. It
is beyond the scope of this FAQ to try and list all of them, but a fairly
good summary is certainly called for.
Right now, Linux offers kernel support of digital ham radio modes. This
means that although they are usually not activated by default, recompiling
the kernel allows support for these modes from within the kernel itself,
no modules or drivers required. It is worth noting two facts here: this
support is not available in any other OS from within the kernel, and it is
available due to the efforts of amateurs around the world who have
contributed to the development of the Linux kernel.
Amateur radio literally has something for everyone. There are hams running
bulletin board systems that are networked all over the world over-the-air.
There are hams working OSCAR Satellites in near earth orbit, or making
contact with the space shuttle as it flies missions. There are hams
bouncing signals off of the moon and back to the earth again. There are
hams that communicate with each other using digitally modulated data
transmissions, rather than analog voice transmissions.
This last kind of communication is in a class known as 'digital mode'.
Probably the most common digital mode is known as packet radio. Packet
radio, also known as AX.25, is actually very similar to the internet in
function. An AX.25 protocol "packet" of data is encoded by a computer,
modulated by a modem (packet modems are known as TNC's or Terminal Node
Controllers), and transmitted by a radio in a 'data burst' that sounds
like a psychotic cricket on speed. You know that sound that your computer
modem makes when you are connecting up on a dial-up connection? data
bursts sound like that but are very, very short. Typically half a second
to three seconds in length. The process of receiving packets is the same,
but in reverse. A ham can 'node hop' from one unattended (or attended, it
really doesn't matter) packet station to another. A member of the team
that produced this document has hopped all the way from the Southern
California basin (USA) to central Texas. Every station in between takes
the packet and ships it on it's way to the next node, like a bucket
brigade used to fight fires in the old days.
On the long range radio spectrums, other protocols are used, but they
function similarly. Stations can communicate digitally with other stations
on the other side of the earth.
Pictures, weather fax and Amateur television are also digital modes.
Digital modes have long been used by law enforcement to communicate car to
car, and access databases while mobile; this all started with the
venerable AX.25 protocol. Remember Packet?
"What", you may ask, "has this got to do with Linux"?
Everything! For one thing, Linux can be easily modified to fit specific
tasks. The kernel code can be changed quite easily. But since Amateur
radio support is already a feature of Linux, no modification is necessary
for most digital modes of communication. The significance of this may not
be immediately apparent. Let me give a specific example.
It has already been mentioned that a special modem called a TNC is needed
to translate (modulate/demodulate) the digital language of the computer
into a sound pattern that represents the original data. These TNC's are
not needed with Linux. Linux is the only OS that supports amateur radio
from the kernel, allowing the Ham to leave the TNC in storage and packet
away in style.
A laptop running Linux can be used as a mobile packet station. Only a
radio and antenna are needed to go on the air, anywhere in the world. The
laptop's (or desktop's) soundcard takes the place of the TNC as data
modem. This saves power and space and is one less thing that might fail.
There are many other digital modes supported by Linux. The reader can
expect more will be supported as new kernel are released.
Hams all over the world answer their communities call for help, when
disaster hits, and reliable communications are needed. Linux is a stable,
reliable OS, and this emergency use has borne the fact out many times
over. When you are a data link for local law enforcement, or Red Cross,
you can't afford a blue screen of death.
After hurricane Andrew, Packet radio was used to provide wireless data
links between national guard, red cross shelters, and law enforcement to
coordinate the relief effort. Hurricane Iniki benefitted similarly from
packet. Packet also well served the rescue workers and the families of
those lost in the sneak attack that destroyed the World Trade Center and
surrounding area on September 11, 2001.
Linux is now, and will continue to be in the future, the OS of choice for
Hams. The reliability, versatility and open source nature of Linux makes
it ideal. For hams running BBS's and Internet gateways to Amateur Radio,
the security offered by Linux is essential. Our systems must remain
secure; at the very least, an illegal transmission can earn us a tongue
lashing from an FCC official observer. At the worst, a misuse of an (often
unattended) station by an intruder could mean our license.
The kernel support for data handling of all digital modes is found nowhere
else. You can certainly use other operating systems. The question is,
don't you want to use the best one for the job? Linux is the clear winner.
For more information on Amateur Radio, contact The American Radio Relay
League at www.arrl.org
4.7 Types of new Linux users drawn to Linux
Of the variety of new users, who are willing to try Linux here are a few
common types.
* Type 1a - the almost happy windows user
Those who use and love Windows but need more stability or can not
afford the software for it they need. They are not looking for Linux,
they are looking for safe, stable, and free Windows. Of these there
are two sub types. One sub type is happy if Linux is close enough to
what they have had before and are pleased to find all the things that
Linux has given them what Windows did not have or they could not
afford.
* Type 1b - the windows acolyte
The other sub type wants WINDOWS and Linux to be a WINDOWS clone in
all aspects. Like this comment I have heard and read so many times,
until Linux can run all the same software as Windows and Look just
like Windows and act just like Windows it is doomed. They very soon
will tend to dump Linux because it is not just like Windows. Wine does
provide much of that for those who want it, however, for that same of
that crowd I hope that Freedows get its act together and provide what
these people are looking for.
* Type 2a - almost happy Macman
Same as above, about Windows, but about MacOS instead.
* Type 2b - the macolyte
Same as above, about Windows, but about MacOS instead.
* Type 3 - gimme choice and freedom!
Those who don't like Windows or MacOS, or are truly sick of them-for
the cost, for the licensing problems, for the fragility, etc-they come
seeking something better, they are seeking stability, they are seeking
power, they are seeking value for their time effort and money, and
they are seeking freedom of choice without. They are NOT seeking what
they have left behind.
* Type 4 - gimme unix back
Those who have used unix before, either as a sysadmin or as a user.
They are not interested in a Windows clone, they want a unix they can
run on whatever hardware they have.
* Type 5 - teach me unix
Those who for personal or other reasons want to learn Linux/unix.
* Type 6 - the unixman
Those who need to run a unix to setup an environment at home equal to
what they need to use at work or school.
* Type 7 - the misdirected cracker
There is a false impression by some that Linux is a cracking tool.
This is a view that is fostered by Windows supporters and is part of
their propaganda against Linux. There are those who are in the
computer cracking scene, who will think that Linux is a hidden,
underground cracking tool. Once they don't find Linux to be that, most
of them will abandon Linux.
5 Linux Documentation and Resources
Contrary to an all too common misperception that is promoted by the
anti-Linux propagandists is that Linux is undocumented, but nothing could
be further from reality. There is a wealth of information available in
your machine, on the net and in books and magazines. If you purchased your
copy of Linux you should have the ability to getting assistance from the
company who created and maintains that Linux distribution.
5.1 Internal
Many programs have builtin documentation passing them the appropriate
command line option, three common command line options for this purpose
are -? -h and -help. Some programs will present you with that
documentation when you execute them without providing them with the
expected arguments. Some programs have that same information available as
an interactive help function.
5.2 man and info
Linux has a comprehensive built-in documentation system inherited from
prior versions of unix that is known as the manual page system (man). The
man documentation is divided into several chapters.
functions described in chapter 2.
available on the system.
packages, tables, C header files, the file hierarchy, general
concepts, and other things which don't fit anywhere else.
by the superuser, like daemons and machine or hardware related
commands.
As is in keeping with the unix standard, each software package should
provide its own applicable man pages for installation into your man pages
manual system. Contrary to the unix standard provision of the man pages,
the FSF has developed a different documentation format known as info
pages. Info pages are a primitive hypertext system providing. All packages
on your linux system should have a manual or info page associated with
them, although occasionally you might find something which is documented
in a different way.
5.3 Developer Provided Documentation
Besides the man and info pages, the developers of Linux and unix software
will usually provide additional documentation with the source code of the
software in the form various text files. Some software will place a copy
of that documentation in /usr/doc, /usr/share/doc, /usr/local/doc, or
/usr/local/share/doc, when it is installed from source. Many of the
precompiled binary packages place these documents into these same
directories.
The standard location of documentation of the Linux kernel is in
/usr/src/linux/Documentation. However, various Linux distributions are now
placing the contents of /usr/src/linux/Documentation into /usr/doc,
/usr/share/doc, /usr/local/doc, or /usr/local/share/doc.
5.4 Linux Documentation Project
The Linux Documentation Project's (also known as LDP) website at at
www.linuxdoc.org provides Guides, How-To's and other documentation. The
documentation that you will find there are provided as HTML for on-line
reading and archived for download in various formats, for use as you need
them.
Many linux distributions provide a How-To collection in in ASCII format
within /usr/share/doc/HOWTO. The guides at the Linux Documentation Project
website include the Network Administrator's Guide and the System
Administrator's Guide, that have been printed as books and sold in book
stores.
5.5 Online Magazine Articles
The Linux Gazette at www.linuxgazette.com was started by a newbie user,
John Fisk, to help other newbies in getting the most from their Linux
systems. It was so successful that it has been adopted by the LDP as part
of their family of documentation.
A slightly more recent online magazine is Linux Focus at
mercury.chem.pitt.edu/ tiho/LinuxFocus/English/index.html, concentrating
in international coverage, with many translations.
5.6 Mailing Lists
There are various Linux centered mailing lists. Many of the major Linux
distributions provide one or more mailing lists for their users and for
the Linux community in general. You can go to their web pages to find out
what they offer, you can also do a web search for Linux mailing lists.
5.7 Newsgroups
There are over 419 Linux newsgroups well. In addition to reading the
newsgroups and posting requests to the newsgroup, don't forget to check
the newsgroup archives at groups.google.com where the chances are someone
else has already posted the same question and received an answer.
5.8 The Web
A major resource to get information regarding Linux is the web. Remember
to try the homepage for your chosen Linux distribution.
Freshmeat at www.freshmeat.net is probably the most comprehensive software
website containing both bleeding edge development and mature software a
like. If you are seeking software for use with Linux or other unix
freshmeat should be your first (or second stop). If you're looking for
that obscure package which will change your life, then look here.
If you're planning a new project, it's wise to use their search engine to
see if another person or team has already started work on something
similar.
Freshmeat also has occasional articles which are typically of high
standard. The main page of Freshmeat's site provides a continuously
updated listing of announcements of the latest new or updated software
submitted to their site. You can access both, the announcements and the
articles by either the web, or by newsgroups.
Here are a few handy Linux websites:
www.sistina.com/products_lvm.htm
5.9 Internet Relay Chat
Internet Relay Chat (IRC) is practically unknown by many of the relatively
new users of the internet. Internet Relay Chat offers a large range of
channels where help can be had in near real-time.
For more information, try www.openprojects.net The openprojects Internet
Relay Chat network hosts more than 4000 channels, so there's almost
certainly one which will meet your needs. This website also has beginners
information for those new to Internet Relay Chat.
This site has a listing of linux Internet Relay Chat channels on various
networks, www.helsinki.fi/ rvaranka/Computer/Linux/IRC.shtml
Also, don't forget the non-Linux IRC networks, there are some very useful
Linux channels available on them as well. Some of the best help is
available from some the quieter channels. The primary thing to remember
when seeking assistance from such a channel is to ask your question and
then wait. Waiting for the reply is important, since too many people will
ask a question and leave the channel a minute latter. By the time the
regulars notice that the question has been asked the questioner has parted
from the channel.
An good IRC channel for one-on-one help is #linuxsupport on EFnet.
5.10 File Transfer Protocol
While not the most modern or trendy internet protocol, the old style FTP
archives are still hard to beat for holding and distributing files and
documentations. In many cases FTP is the work horse behind the web file
distributions.
Some of the FTP sites useful to Linux users:
5.11 Online Radio Shows
You can even follow Linux by listening to The Linux Show your on internet
radio broadcasts. See webwww.thelinuxshow.com. It's broadcast live once
per week in the wee hours (UTC), however archives are available for those
of us not living near to the Pacific.
5.12 The Source
If all else fails, you can use the ultimate documentation, use the source.
Most Linux software is open source meaning that you have free access to
the source code of that software. If you can read the source code, you can
consult it to learn what you need to know.
If you learn that the software is not designed to do what you want it to,
you have the choice of changing the program to do what you want it to do.
This is something that came in handy when setting up the software needed
to support the production and publication of this document. There was a
key program that was needed and could not be located. There were several
close matches to the requirements for the project, but no workable match.
So, the software that was the best match was selected and patched to
provide the features that were needed but were missing from that software.
Even if you can't understand the source code, you can find someone who
does. The developer/maintainer(s) will generally be willing to help you if
you've exhausted all the information sources above. If you've found a bug,
then tell them anyway - you'll generally be amazed at how quickly they get
fixed.
6 Contributing to the Linux Community
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
6.1 There are Many Reasons to Contribute
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
6.2 It is Not Crazy to Contribute
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
7 Anti-Linux Propagandists and Trolls
The comp.os.linux.advocacy newsgroup is a newsgroup that is under siege by
one or more factions of anti-Linux propagandists. In the past those
factions have appeared to be confident and smug; however, as of late it
appears that they are becoming ever more desperate. The reason for their
desperation appears to be as a result of growth of the mind share of Linux
and the continuing failures of their chosen cause. Besides the true
anti-Linux propagandists there are also the occasional classic newsgroup
troll.
It can be difficult to determine what type of person a particular
disruptive personality is; an anti-Linux Propagandist or just a troll.
That is because they both use some of the same tactic. What it not
difficult to determine is what their purpose is when they post to COLA.
They are doing it to disrupt the newsgroup and sidetrack its purpose of
existence. Regardless of their reason for the disruption, they are trying
to prevent: the free exchange of knowledge and support based on experience
of using Linux that would otherwise be happening in COLA, if it were not
for their interference.
The free and open discussions between the experienced users and the new
users and the would be users of Linux that is our goal. That is the goal
of all those who would be Linux advocates as well as all others who come
to COLA to discuss Linux. All of us, Linux users new and old, those
curious about Linux, and others, have come to COLA as students and as
teachers. All that is except for the anti-Linux propagandists and the
trolls, they have come to COLA to destroy it and prevent its being an
asset to the Linux community.
As has been stated else where in this document, all are welcome in COLA,
except those who come to COLA to destroy Linux, COLA, or the Linux
Community.
7.1 Disinformation
If COLA were a physical location like a building where those who would
advocate the growth of the Linux operating systems and the Linux community
gather, the anti-Linux propagandists would be raiding that building. They
would be vandalizing the building, painting graffiti on the walls,
defecating and urinating on the floors and furniture, breaking down the
doors, setting fire to the building and physically assaulting the resident
Linux advocates and the visitors who happen to be in the building at the
time of the raid.
COLA is not a physical location, so they have had to adapt their methods
so that they can do an on-line version of what was described in the prior
paragraph. A key method used by anti-Linux propagandist to attack Linux,
its users, sysadmins, developers, advocates and those who have come to
COLA to lean about Linux. is a form of propaganda known as disinformation.
One of their favorite version of disinformation is known as FUD.
7.2 FUD
+---------------------+
| Removed for rewrite |
+---------------------+
7.3 A Common FUD of the Anti-Linux Propagandists
An example of dishonesty of the anti-Linux propagandists is their common
claim that the Linux proponents in COLA oppose the use of any other
operating system. They also would have you believe that the Linux
proponents in COLA oppose everyone who does not use Linux all the time.
Those are some of the lies that they use to try to discredit Linux users
who post in COLA.
The truth is that a user of one or more operating systems other than Linux
are not opposed in COLA for that reason alone. Many of the Linux Advocates
in COLA have experience on many other operating systems besides Linux.
Many do use multiple operating systems on a regular basis. It is due to
this experience that any disinformation regarding the capabilities of
Linux, or that of other operating systems are easily detected by the Linux
advocates.
It is not difficult to tell the difference between an anti-Linux
Propagandist and a true advocates of another operating system. Occasional
mention of other operating systems is fine. However, it is the frequent or
continuous promotion of other operating systems that turns a welcome
poster into an unwelcome troll or anti-Linux propagandist.
7.4 The Effect of the Trespassers
If the purpose of the anti-Linux propagandists was to create a disruption
in order to seek attention or for some other of the excuses that people
have used for trolling newsgroups, they could be ignored and in time they
would go away. However that is not their intent and the classic "just
killfile them" tactic does not work with anti-Linux propagandists. If
every regular poster did just killfile them, they would have freedom to
abuse the new Linux users and the rest of the COLA readership unopposed.
7.4.1 Effect on Readers of COLA
The anti-Linux propagandists fill the newsgroup many useless, empty, or
abusive articles, making it difficult for the readership of COLA to find a
thread discussing serious issues. In this way they are damaging the
utility of COLA as a valuable resource for the benefit of the Linux
community.
7.4.2 Effect Upon Posters
By using their time refuting and otherwise dealing with the disinformation
posted by the anti-Linux propagandists, the Linux proponents posting in
COLA don't have that time available that they would otherwise have to
write and post proper advocacy article, to develop software for Linux, or
otherwise promote and improve Linux.
7.4.3 Effect of the X-No-Archive header
The X-No-Archive header was created for a valid purpose, but has been
abused by the anti-Linux propagandists who are posting in COLA. By the use
of that header in their articles, they avoid having them archives in the
Google newsgroups archives and other such archives that may exist. This
means that their lies and other dishonest tactics are no stored in those
archives. Therefore, they can repost the same lies over and over again.
When they switch from one identity to another they can post the same lies
all over again feeling confident that without the ability to have their
prior use of those lies confirmed in the archives, they can fool at least
some of the readership of COLA.
They are also feel that by avoiding the usenet newsgroup archives that
there is no evidence to prove their misdeeds if and when complaints are
filed regarding their deeds. Deeds that are in violation of the agreements
that they have entered into with their internet service providers and some
deeds that are also criminal in nature.
All of this has been admitted by the anti-Linux propagandists. Once again
they are confident that proof of those admissions can not be retrieved
from the archives.
One anti-Linux propagandist who uses this header has posted to COLA with 6
confirmed false identities and has posted using the email address of
another person in his from header, causing that other person to be email
bombed by many complaints for the actions of that anti-Linux propagandist.
Another anti-Linux propagandist who has done the same and far worse for
years and has used over fifty false identities for repeating the same lies
over and over again.
7.5 Where the Disrupters Should Go
Many of the readership of COLA would like to tell the anti-Linux
Propagandists and trolls just where they can go. But that balmy place that
makes the planet Venus appear to be the Antarctic by comparison is not a
valid destination.
A common excuse made by the propagandists for their posting to COLA is,
``If not in COLA where will I go to post?''. The answer to that question
for any particular propagandist or troll can be simple or it can be
complex, it depends on what that person claims to be his motivation to be
posting in COLA.
Unfortunately, their claimed motivations and their true reasons for
posting in COLA do not often agree. What appears to be their motivation on
first consideration is most often only a smoke screen to hide their true
motivation as an anti-Linux propagandist with their intended purpose to
disrupt COLA and prevent the continued growth and acceptance of the Linux
community.
Here are some of the claimed motivations of the propagandists and trolls,
along with where they should be posting based on those motivations:
* The trespasser has come to COLA in order to criticize Linux and vent
about his experiences with it. For that purpose three newsgroups have
been created.
* alt.comp.linux-sucks
* alt.linux.sucks
* alt.linux.sux
* The trespasser has come to COLA in order to advocate Windows. For that
purpose a newsgroup has been created.
* comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
* The trespasser has come to COLA in order to advocate Windows NT. For
that purpose a newsgroup has been created.
* comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
* The trespasser has come to COLA in order to vent his dislike of
Microsoft and/or Windows. For that purpose several newsgroups have
been created.
* alt.crimehip.microsoft.sucks
* alt.emircpih.microsoft.sucks
* alt.flame.ms-windows
* alt.h.i.p.c.r.i.m.e.microsoft.sucks
* alt.h0pcr0me.microsoft.sucks
* alt.h1pcr1me.microsoft.sucks
* alt.h2pcr2me.microsoft.sucks
* alt.hh.ii.pp.cc.rr.ii.mm.ee.microsoft.sucks
* alt.hipclone.microsoft.sucks
* alt.hipcrime.microsoft.sucks
* alt.microsoft.crash.crash.crash
* alt.microsoft.sucks
* alt.os.windows95.crash.crash.crash
* comp.misc.microsoft.sucks
* microsoft.sucks.
* sk.sux.microsoft
* The trespasser has come to COLA in order to entertain himself with
debates, arguments and fights. For that purpose a large number of
newsgroups have been created.
* alt.arguments
* alt.flame
* alt.flame-wars
* alt.flame.operating-systems
* 258 other flame newsgroups
* 20 debate newsgroups
So as you can see there are many placed where a propagandist can go to
and actually be welcomed for a change. Perhaps they have lost their
way, so be helpful and tell the trespassers in COLA where they can and
should go.
7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics
This is a list of the disinformation tactics that the that the anti-Linux
propagandists who post in COLA have been using. All of these tactics have
been used in COLA by the anti-Linux propagandists against the Linux
advocates and the rest of the COLA readership to further the cause of the
anti-Linux propagandists. This list has been worded as though you are one
of them, so that you can better see through their eyes how they think.
Act offended or claim that opposing viewpoints are incredible and/or
unbelievable. When you are unable to valid argument to refute a Linux
advocate, use empty statements such as:
* "OH PULEEEZE!"
* "Only a Linonut would say that"
* "And they wonder why no one takes Linux seriously!"
* "How dare you say that!"
* "That's the way to offend thousands!"
Distract your opponent from the issues at hand by accusing your
opponents of being "petty", "pathetic", "childish" or any of a number
of other such terms.
Put your opponent off guard by insulting him. The liberal use of
profanity and vulgarisms can be very effective, particularly when used
against you more dignified opponents. Your experience as a school
yard bully can be handy here
Be patronizing, condescending and present an air of superiority. It
may hide your inferiority to the casual reader. Use phrases like
"kid" or "son", to elevate your relative apparent authority by
attempting to diminish that of the Linux advocate you are addressing.
Discredit your opponent or his position through the use of
inappropriate laugher and other non-verbal grunts.
When your tactics are turned on you, call you opponents trolls. Do
not accept the fact that by calling someone using your tactics a troll
that makes you the real troll.
Keep posting non-stop. Flood the group with your idiocy and nonsense.
Some readers may equate your volume with proof of quality. You will
tie good Linux advocates in knots trying to refute you and they won't
have time for real advocacy.
Brag about destroying newsgroups and threaten to do the same to
comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Drive as many good Linux Advocates out of the group as possible.
10. Refuse to admit your errors
Never ever admit your errors no matter how blatant they are. If you
find no way out and have to admit that you are wrong, phrase it so
that you can accuse your opponent of being wrong.
11. Never apologize for your misbehavior
Never ever apologize no matter how out of line you have been behaving.
If you should ever find it to your advantage to apologize, phrase it
as a slap in the face of the person who you have already wronged.
12. Blame your stupidity and lies on your opponent
Blame your own stupidity on the Linux advocate you are dealing with.
Such as when you have made an unsupportable claim that suggest a list
of details and your are asked to present your non-existent list reply
with, "I don't have to list them for you; you aren't bright enough to
know what you're missing by using X instead of a real Y, I'm not going
to explain it to you." Then hope that nobody reading the thread
realizes that your statement translates as, "I lack the knowledge or
facts needed to counter your position or your position is too complete
and accurate to be refuted. So, I will say things to sound superior
to avoid admitting you are right."
13. Embarrass your opponent
Locate or create apparently embarrassing information or detail and
utilize it out of all proportion-trying to create a scandal around it,
to hijack a thread or drive everyone to distraction.
14. Blackmail your opponent
Locate or create apparently embarrassing information or detail and
threaten your opponent with exposure to force him to do as you want
him to. This tactic can be combined with the "Embarrass your opponent"
tactic if you can no longer get your way though Blackmail.
15. Avoid answering direct questions
Avoid answering a direct questions that you fear by claiming to not
have seen the question then refuse to address it for other reasons.
Keep it up along with other tactics until your opponent is distracted
from the question.
16. Turn a question asked of you back on your opponent
Better yet, turn the questions back on the Linux Advocate with a
question like: "What do you think is the `right' answer, lamer?" You
have now taken the heat off of your ignorance and you have cast doubt
on the credibility of your opponent.
17. Don't substantiate your claims
Refuse to present evidence to support your invalid claims. Repeat your
invalid claims and have your anti-Linux propagandist comrades do the
same. Do the same for any invalid claims that you have notice your
anti-Linux propagandists comrades make.
18. Don't discuss evidence counter to your position
Avoid examining or discussing evidence counter to your position. This
is especially effective when combined with 3.2.8, Dancing Fool,
wherein you change your position with every post.
19. Present multiple personalities
Change your position with every few article you post to
comp.os.linux.advocacy. Appear to be supporting all sides of the
issues. You can make a statements or opinion in one posting then
follow it up with a another post with a contrary opinion. You can even
get into an argument with yourself. This could cause readers to
dismiss the subject of the thread.
20. Narrow the scope of threads so that you can handle it. Narrow the
scope of the issues that are being addressed in a thread to details
you feel that you can refute, ridicule, or dismiss leaving the main
issues unaddressed.
21. Widen the scope of threads to swamp out the original issue.
Widen the scope of the issues discussed in a thread to the point that
the original issues are buried away and hopefully soon forgotten.
22. Use invalid statistics
Introduce statistics to try to hurt Linux, Linux Advocates, and/or the
Linux community at large. Do not about them be valid or real. It would
be nice if you can find those statistics on-line, but if you can't
find any, invent them out of whole cloth. If they are discredited,
don't let that bother you, keep citing them. If you see a fellow
anti-Linux propagandist using statistics, cite them as well, no matter
their lack of validity.
23. Lie
Lie, lie, lie, lie. If you do it often enough you may create the
appearance of truth.
24. Ignore dictionaries when they don't support you
Rage against the use of dictionaries or other such documents, their
use can only hurt you and expose your ignorance.
25. Attack new posters who favor Linux
Some of these Linux Advocates may be new to Linux and COLA. Show no
mercy. Pounce upon their innocence with every single one of these
tactics. If you are lucky you might turn them to your side, at the
very least you may be able to drive them out of COLA and neutralize
them as a threat.
26. Attack typos and ignore the content of the message.
Point out your opponent's grammatical flaws and spelling errors. By
doing this you can concentrate on form while ignoring substance. This
is a very handy method to discredit your opponent and by extension his
position, without once again exposing your ignorance of the issues
begin discussed in the thread.
27. Use Spelling and Grammatical Errors to Distract
Make statements like, "Why do you nea d to dbug the cernal? Is lienux
not working agen!" When this tactic works, you have disarmed the
supporters of Linux who have chosen to ignore you because of your
idiot act, others may react to your style and fail to refute your
disinformation. Meanwhile, you have posted your disinformation in
support your cause.
28. Start trolling threads
Start threads with subjects like "Linsux Sux", "Linux fonts are bad",
etc. Manufacture false evidence to back up your claims when possible,
but don't worry that that is not important. All that is important is
that you consume the efforts and resources of Linux Advocate as they
try to refute your trolling threads and that you scare the new and
casual readership of COLA.
29. Unreasonably proclaim your reasonableness
If your method to deliver anti-Linux propaganda is not among the more
article style, you can try to claim to be reasonable. Of course if you
really were reasonable, you would not be an anti-Linux propagandists
in he first place; however, compared to your more radical comrades you
may seem to be more reasonable. You can not be certain that the
readership of COLA will accept your actions as being reasonable
without your prompting them to think of you that way. So you need
frequently mention how reasonable you are.
30. Expose yourself on COLA.
Post articles in COLA containing ASCII art depicting your body
including your genitals, either in the message body or in the sig.
Discuss your bodily functions and your bodily wastes, the more
disgusting the better. It will tend to drive away more of the casual
and new readers. The Linux Advocates who are frequent posters may
become disgusted enough to avoid threads that you involve yourself in.
31. If it makes Microsoft or Windows look bad call it a rumor
Claim that anything that tends to make Microsoft or Windows look bad
is an unfounded rumor and that you opponent is being unfair. If the
information is obscure enough claim that it is an urban legend, hoping
that no one knows that many legends are based on fact.
32. Promote Windows at every opportunity
Microsoft Windows needs a lot of help to be successful in the mind
share of its targeted user base. Point out to everybody on COLA how
wonderful it is. Ignore the meaning of the name of the newsgroup and
its charter.
33. Claim false Alignment
Remind Everyone that you are a long-time Linux user and advocate. Of
course it is not true, so you will be accused of being what you really
are. When that happens and you are accused of working against Linux.
Deny! Deny! Deny!
34. Use of false identities
Create throw away identities to enter the newsgroup to spread discord
and after a few days or weeks, stop using that identity. If you are
losing an argument create a new identity to support the position of
your main identity. If things are getting slow, create a few
identities counter to your primary identity. Start a n-on-1 argument
with your primary identity being outnumbered. Then have each of your
new identities be convinced by your primary identity to the error of
their ways.
35. When thing get too hot go away
When all else fails and things get too hot, disappear from the group.
This is not as drastic as it sounds. You might stay away for a few
months and then return hoping that the other wintrolls have softened
up the field a bit. If you don't want to stay away at all. Create a
new primary identity and drop the use of the other one.
36. Enter COLA as a sleeper.
If you are a new anti-Linux propagandist, or at least your current
false identity is new, then make your entrance as a dedicated Linux
user. After a little while, claim to have seen the light and "convert
back to Windows". Then you can promote Windows all you want for a
while, before your true nature is commonly known. Sometimes this works
for several hours before you are shouted down and have to move on to a
new identity or continue on as "normal" anti-Linux propagandist.
37. Enter COLA as a false disgruntled Linux user.
Create a throw away false identity to enter the newsgroup in order
claim to be short or long term Linux users who "have had enough of
Linux and are returning to Windows." Stir things up for a day or two
and disappear forever.
38. Never leave a Linux positive thread unchallenged.
If there is a thread developing that is positive for Linux, hijack
that thread at all cost. Even if it means sacrificing your current
identity. One method to do this is to ramble on about other topics,
with or without the use embedded insults. Even if you fail to hijack
the thread, you may be able to derail it enough to cancel the
positive-for Linux-impact that it could have had.
39. Lie about what you know
Claim credit for experience, knowledge, or education that you do not
have. It will impress readers who are not knowledgeable on the topic
of the moment. Be careful to not engage someone who is truly
knowledgeable on the subject in conversation or your actual ignorance
will be exposed.
40. Avoid providing any help.
Because you claim to be such an expert so often, you may from time to
time be asked for assistance. Don't provide it, you would only
destroy the image you have lied so long to create. Treat an honest
request based on a real situation as an argument: Restate the request
for assistance in a real situation as a hypothetical situation that
you can argue against.
41. Use of Undefined Terminology
Use terms such as "indoctrinated" as a substitute for "educated" or
"experienced" when referring to a Linux Advocate. Use "pedantic" in
place of "correct", "precise", or "accurate" when referring to a Linux
Advocate. Create and use personal definitions such as "commercial
quality" for impressive sounding terms to mislead the unwary. But
never share your definitions for your inappropriate terminology. This
is commonly known as Troll-speak.
42. Use fake email addresses.
Use a fake email address, not just a de-spammed address like real
advocates use, but a completely fake and made-up one. If you feel the
need for the appearance of normality use a real appearing email
address-maybe not one of yours, but you can try to explain your act of
identity theft as an accident.
43. Citing vapor postings
Cite the statements that you had "intended" to include but never
actual written into your past posting. Gamble on the possibility that
nobody will remember what you posted and that nobody will do the
research to determine what you have posted. If you loose that bet, use
another disinformation tactic to deflect the results of your using
this tactic.
44. Use being an idiot as an excuse
When you are criticized for using disinformation tactics, claim
ignorance of the disinformation tactics and use your apparent idiocy
as an excuse for your actions. Do the same for your comrades, when a
Linux Advocate corners one of your fellow anti-Linux propagandists
tell that advocate something like "What are you doing? It's only John
Doe for goodness sake!"
45. Criticize Linux Advocates but ignore anti-Linux propagandist
transgressions
Always criticize the behavior of Linux Advocates, but, ignore the same
and even worse transgressions are being committed by your fellow
Trespassers.
46. Accept the claims of other anti-Linux propagandists as face value
Always treat other anti-Linux propagandist's statements as being true.
Accept their interpretations without question, don't bother verifying
their statements. If they claim something against a Linux advocate
always side with the anti-Linux propagandists.
47. Don't do your own homework
Make your opponent do your research for you. Depending on who much
credibility you still have will determine how successful you will be
at this tactic.
48. Don't let your ignorance stop you from posting
No matter how little you understand of the issues being discussed in a
thread, post anyway. If you don't know what you are talking about just
pretend that you do.
49. Restate the issues to support your preconceptions
If the issues being discussed in a thread are not exploitable by you
for your purpose, restate the issues to support your ability to attack
Linux Advocate opponent.
50. Claim god like attributes
Claim god like attributes, such as being all knowing. If you don't
want to make that claim, behave as though you are, any way.
51. Claim only you understand what the issues are.
Claim and other wise present the attitude to imply that only you know
what the issues really are. Attempt to project the attitude that would
tend to discredit your opponent at the same time.
52. Invoke the mythical average user
Always use the mythical average users as your yardstick for usability.
No matter what is being discussed about Linux, restate the abilities
of the average users to fall short of that needed.
53. Use extortion to build an army
Use extortion against a group to generate an army of flunkies to do
your bidding and do you fighting for you. Such as when things are not
going the way you want in COLA, crosspost a threat in another
newsgroup a thread of your intention of making thing miserable for
them if they don't take up your battle for you. This is a dangerous
tactic for you the anti-Linux propagandists. If they don't react the
way you wanted them to, you will either have to forget it or you could
carry our your threat. If you forget it, you will loose even more
credibility. If you carry out your threat you will still loose
credibility and you could open yourself up for reprisal from those
your are hurting by carrying out your threat. Even if you do form your
army, you will be held responsible for the results of their actions on
your behalf. A recent case (as of this writing) of this tactic being
used by a anti-Linux propagandists can be revived by reading the
thread that resulted with the crossposting of Message-ID:
ozub8.40974$Wf1.7...@ruti.visi.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy and
comp.os.linux.misc.
54. The devil made me do it
When you are caught in a situation for which you can not explain you
actions without a confession of your dishonesty and your alignment,
blame it on someone else. Create a boogyman to take the blame. A
variation of this tactic was used in the thread cited above, in which
the failed extortionist blames all the Linux Advocates in COLA for
forcing him into attempting extortion.
7.7 Methods to Counter Disinformation
Now that you have seen some of the tactics that that the anti-Linux
propagandist who post in COLA use against Linux advocates, the rest of the
COLA readership, and the Linux community at large, you may be wondering
how to counter them. There are several methods that have successfully
curtailed the activities of the anti-Linux propagandists. Those of you who
have been reading COLA for the past few months before the initial posting
of this document may have noted varying, sometimes puzzling, reactions to
the disinformation tactics of the anti-Linux propagandists by various
Linux advocates. These were experiments gauging the reactions of
anti-Linux propagandists to the methods the are being recommend in this
document.
The methods of dealing with the anti-Linux propagandists are being
presented in the order of their apparent effectiveness. You can mix and
match them to suit your personality.
7.7.1 Use of Trespasser Disinformation Tactics List
A method that has worked successfully is to counter the use of
disinformation tactics by the anti-Linux propagandists is to identify
which tactic or tactics that an anti-Linux propagandist is using in a
particular message. Use the trespasser disinformation tactics list, Do not
address their individual comments in the message you are replying to
rather examine all their comments in that article under consideration.
Create a list of tactics that they have used in that article and place the
list of the tactics they have used in a single comment block.
As an example:
+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Joe.Propagandist wrote in comp.os.linux.advocacy: |
| >[snipped disinformation text] |
| Disinformation tactics you have used are: |
| 2. Distract from the issue by using personal attacks |
| 3. Use profanity |
| 12. Blame your stupidity and lies on your opponent |
| 16. Turn a question asked of you back on your opponent |
| 22. Use invalid statistics |
| 48. Restate the issues to support your preconceptions |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
It is recommended that you use this tactic as soon as possible in the
thread, supply no other comments to the anti-Linux propagandist. Anything
you say to them can be latched on to as the basis for their continued
spreading of disinformation. This method has been very successful in field
tests.
7.7.2 Refute Disinformation Where Possible
Post a refutation of the disinformation early in the thread. Use only
verifiable facts and include the proof of the validity of your statements
including references to the source documents when possible. When citing a
past article that is not an immediate predecessor to your article in the
thread, include the message ID of that cited article. Including a URL to
it can also be helpful but does not replace the message ID. The URL may
remain viable or not overtime, the message ID will remain viable.
When you are lucky, the anti-Linux propagandist will drop the issue after
that; however, that is not too common. Most of the time, anti-Linux
propagandists will continue on ignoring your efforts or employ another of
their disinformation tactics. If that is the case, it is often best to
ignore drop the issue, unless you see an opening that you can use to
further expose the dishonesty of that anti-Linux propagandist.
This is a powerful method, as long as you don't let yourself get drawn in
to a situation that you can not handle.
7.7.3 Stay On Topic
All too often a Linux Advocate will respond to a anti-Linux propagandist,
and in no time at all, the anti-Linux propagandist gains near complete
control of the discussion. Continuing to follow the thread as the
anti-Linux propagandists lead, you will find yourself in a mirror maze of
twisted logic aiding neither yourself the others of the COLA readership.
The only persons aided by your efforts would be the anti-Linux
propagandists.
7.7.4 What Have they Contributed to Linux
If an anti-Linux propagandist or even a classic troll makes repeated
complaints about Linux, ask them what they have done to improve the
situation that they are complaining about.
For example, if one of them were to start complaining about typographical
errors of a How-To, ask that person if he has contacted the author of that
document to help proof read that document. The applicability of this
method is rather limited compared to the others, however, it has been
successful in those cases where it applies.
7.7.5 Use Your Newsreader Scoring and Killfile Features
The great bulk of the anti-Linux propagandists produce nothing but noise.
You can use your newsreader's killfile, scoring, or filtering facilities
to to filter out their posts. This will almost eliminate the anti-Linux
propagandists problem for you. That is good for you, but does nothing to
help cure the overall problem and is leaving the others in COLA to deal
with it in your stead. If all of the pro-Linux regular posters of COLA
were to do this, it would leave all of the disinformation of the
anti-Linux propagandists unchallenged and possibly misleading the neophyte
members of the COLA readership.
8 Linux's BSD cousins.
Much of what is covered in this FAQ and Primer that is not too Linux
specific and is not COLA specific also applies to the other free unixes
such as FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and NetBSD. Each of these unix operating systems
runs mostly the same software as Linux. The user environment is mostly the
same, with the exception of some features of Linux that is not yet
available on the BSD's. Each of these other unix operating systems are
similar to Linux in many ways, so that often an ordinary non-root user,
who is not a programmer and is not involved in the lower systems level
operations would be hard pressed to know whether he is on a Linux or a BSD
host, unless it is a hardware platform that Linux supports and the BSD's
do not, or vice versa.
We are all friends, in fact many who run Linux also run a BSD. As long as
the fans and advocate of a BSD or other unix do not behave as anti-Linux
propagandists do, they are welcome in COLA, as hopefully Linux advocates
are just as welcome to visit their newsgroups.
9 Credits
This document was made possible by the efforts of the following
individuals:
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Maintainer |
| mjcr mj...@mindspring.com |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Team Associate Members |
| TuxTrax ARC...@zerojunkTUXTRAX.COM |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contributers |
| Charlie Ebert kd...@localhost.localdomain |
| Darren Darre...@Frankenstein.com |
| Ed Allen eal...@allenhome.kc.rr.com |
| Edward Rosten u98...@ecs.ox.ac.uk |
| Jerry Nash jn...@memento.org |
| Mark Bickel Mark....@ericsson.com |
| Mark S Bilk ma...@cosmicpenguin.com |
| Mark Kent ma...@NOHAM.otford.kent.btinternet.co.uk |
| Mart van de Wege mvdwege...@drebbelstraat20.dyndns.org |
| Scott Bicknell sbic...@prodigy.net |
| Roy Culley r...@swissonline.ch |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
9.1 Friends of COLA and this Project
#linuxsupport on EFnet
LinuxGuruz http://www.linuxguruz.org
10 Pesky Details
While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this document,
The Frequently Asked Questions and Primer for comp.os.linux.advocacy Team
and the members thereof, assumes no responsibility for errors or
omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information
contained herein. The information is on an "as is" basis.
All trademarks and service marks mentioned in this document are the
property of their respective owners. The use in this document of a terms
that are trademarks or service marks should not be regarded as affecting
the validity of any trademark or service mark.
The COLA FAQ and Primer team reserves the right to edit and/or reject any
submission that is offered for consideration to be included in this or any
future edition of this document. Any material so offered may be included
in piecemeal, in its entirety, or not at all, at the discretion of the
team.
The use of the masculine pronoun in this FAQ and Primer is intended to be
gender neutral unless a particular person is being specified. The use of
male pronouns this way is more dignified that using "it", and leads to
cleaner sentences than using "he or she", "him or her", or even
"he/she/it".
This FAQ and Primer was produced and is being maintained entirely with the
use of software running on the Linux operating system.
Copyright (c) 2002 The Frequently Asked Questions and Primer for
comp.os.linux.advocacy Team - All Rights Reserved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2002-04-19