Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Largest named number (bigger than googolplex)

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Phil Gustafson

unread,
Jan 13, 1993, 2:12:30 AM1/13/93
to
In article <1993Jan13....@midway.uchicago.edu> th...@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>
>I hereby define Frank's Number, defined as
>"the largest named number not named Frank, plus one,"
>which gives information about the relationships between the English language
>and math.

This reminds me of a famous paradox, "The smallest integer that can't be
specified in English by fewer than twenty-six syllables".

Phil "I think I counted right" Gustafson
--
|play: ph...@rahul.net
|work: (Under Construction) | Phil Gustafson 408-286-1749 |
| Opinions outside attributed material are mine alone. |
| Satirical matter is not necessarily identified as such. |

Henry Choy

unread,
Jan 13, 1993, 11:56:13 AM1/13/93
to
Ted Frank (th...@ellis.uchicago.edu) wrote:
: I hereby define Frank's Number, defined as

: "the largest named number not named Frank, plus one,"
: which gives information about the relationships between the English language
: and math.

Couldn't the letter "2" be a name for the number 2?
Then Franks' Number + 1 is a name for a number greater than Frank's
Number. So Frank's Number - 1 isn't the greatest number not named
Frank's Number. To save brain power, I'll call every number Frank.
Then there is no Frank's Number.


--

Henry Choy
ch...@cs.usask.ca

What rolls down stairs alone or in pairs This has been brought to
Rolls over your neighbor's dog? you by the numbers 4
What's great for a snack and fits on your back? and 9 and the letter P.
It's Log, Log, Log! -- "The Log Song", from -- Big Bird
Ren & Stimpy

Math is tough! -- Barbie

barth.richards

unread,
Jan 13, 1993, 2:43:43 PM1/13/93
to

>I hereby define Frank's Number, defined as
>"the largest named number not named Frank, plus one,"
>which gives information about the relationships between the English language
>and math.

I hearby proclaim the existence of Barth's Number, which is equal to:

infinity - 0.X

where X = an infinity number of zeros followed by a one.

>Ted "I win" Frank


Barth "not even close, Ted" Richards

--
8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
88 Barth Richards "Language is a virus from outer space." 88
88 att!ihlpf!barth - William S. Burroughs 88
8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

Jason D Corley

unread,
Jan 13, 1993, 4:22:27 PM1/13/93
to
In article <1993Jan13....@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> ba...@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (barth.richards) writes:
>
>In article <1993Jan13....@midway.uchicago.edu> th...@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>
>>I hereby define Frank's Number, defined as
>>"the largest named number not named Frank, plus one,"
>>which gives information about the relationships between the English language
>>and math.
>
>I hearby proclaim the existence of Barth's Number, which is equal to:
>
> infinity - 0.X
>
>where X = an infinity number of zeros followed by a one.
>
>>Ted "I win" Frank
>

I hereby proclaim the existence of Corley's Number which is equal to:

The number of numbers there are (including Corley's Number) + 1

Jason "Pretty close, Barth" Corley

--
****************************************************************************
"Generally, things have gone about as far as they can possibly go when
things have got about as bad as they can reasonably get."--Tom Stoppard
Jason D. Corley (aka cor...@gas.uug.arizona.edu) Physics, Lunacy, etc.

Jared Dahl

unread,
Jan 13, 1993, 6:00:32 PM1/13/93
to
In article <1993Jan13.2...@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>, cor...@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley ) writes:
|> In article <1993Jan13....@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> ba...@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (barth.richards) writes:
|> >
|> >In article <1993Jan13....@midway.uchicago.edu> th...@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
|> >
|> >>I hereby define Frank's Number, defined as
|> >>"the largest named number not named Frank, plus one,"
|> >>which gives information about the relationships between the English language
|> >>and math.
|> >
|> >I hearby proclaim the existence of Barth's Number, which is equal to:
|> >
|> > infinity - 0.X
|> >
|> >where X = an infinity number of zeros followed by a one.
|> >
|> >>Ted "I win" Frank
|> >
|>
|> I hereby proclaim the existence of Corley's Number which is equal to:
|>
|> The number of numbers there are (including Corley's Number) + 1
|>
|> Jason "Pretty close, Barth" Corley

I hereby proclaim the existence of Dahl's Number which is equal to:

( The number of JFK Conspiracy Theories + The number of posts
with "who do you know that is famous" thread + The references
to Kibo + the number of words that the eskimos have for snow
+ 1 )^2

Jared "USENET is infinite in itself" Dahl
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Jared Dahl | "My heart is human, my blood is boiling, |
| Systems Programmer | my brain IBM" |
| IBM - Rochester, MN | -- STYX, "Mr. Roboto" |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Opinions expressed are mine, not my employer's.
Don't send e-mail - I won't get it.

James Kibo Parry

unread,
Jan 14, 1993, 2:27:40 AM1/14/93
to
[sci.math]

In article <1993Jan13.2...@rchland.ibm.com> jd...@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl) writes:
>In article <1993Jan13.2...@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>, cor...@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley ) writes:
>|> In article <1993Jan13....@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> ba...@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (barth.richards) writes:
>|> >
>|> >In article <1993Jan13....@midway.uchicago.edu> th...@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>|> >
>|> >>I hereby define Frank's Number, defined as
>|> >>"the largest named number not named Frank, plus one,"
>|> >>which gives information about the relationships between the English language
>|> >>and math.
>|> >
>|> >I hearby proclaim the existence of Barth's Number, which is equal to:
>|> >
>|> > infinity - 0.X
>|> >
>|> >where X = an infinity number of zeros followed by a one.
>|> >
>|> >>Ted "I win" Frank
>|> >
>|>
>|> I hereby proclaim the existence of Corley's Number which is equal to:
>|>
>|> The number of numbers there are (including Corley's Number) + 1
>|>
>|> Jason "Pretty close, Barth" Corley
>
>I hereby proclaim the existence of Dahl's Number which is equal to:
>
> ( The number of JFK Conspiracy Theories + The number of posts
> with "who do you know that is famous" thread + The references
> to Kibo + the number of words that the eskimos have for snow
> + 1 )^2

Big deal. Kibo's Number, which may not be the largest, is certainly the
most useful.

N = 0.99
k

It is used for pricing supermarket products. For an item of
value x, the actual price in dollars is x + N - 1. This makes the
k
item of value x seem, to bozos, to be priced at x-1. Indeed, clever use
of Kibo's Number can make a $20,000 car, priced at $19,999, seem
cheap--and for items that cost less than a dollar, it can actually make
them seem free!
-- K.
Coming soon:
Avogadro's Hernia
The Loews Googolplex
Fermat's Last Supper

Craig Presson

unread,
Jan 14, 1993, 9:34:09 AM1/14/93
to
[a.f.u removed]
In article <1993Jan13....@midway.uchicago.edu> th...@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank) writes:
In article <1993Jan13.0...@samba.oit.unc.edu> Bruce....@launchpad.unc.edu (Bruce Tindall) writes:
[googolplex biggest?]

I hereby define Frank's Number, defined as
"the largest named number not named Frank, plus one,"
which gives information about the relationships between the English language
and math.

Ted "I win" Frank
Presson's Number, P, is defined as "Frank's Number, plus one"
which gives information about the relationship between numbers
and oneupsmanship.

Square One TV News Flash: "Two oddly-named variables were seen leaving
the Net early today, in a hotly-contested race. A spokesman at the
Universal Library promised to look up the result and call us back."

Craig "Aleph-0 channels and nothing on" Presson

0 new messages