Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Get all the fortune cookies you can eat!!?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Sabine Blochberger

unread,
Dec 5, 2002, 12:52:52 PM12/5/02
to
Today in a game of NetHack 3.4 on Win2k I noticed that you can eat the
fortune cookies off of a shops floor without getting charged!

In the first shop I had bought all the food rartions that he had (3) and a
cram-ration. The fortune cookie I ate because I was getting hungry and since
I was a healer full of $$, I had a bite at it.... To no charge! Heh, I
thought it must be the discount for regular buyers, but behold, in the next
level there's a general store too, and without byuing anything first, i eat
his cookies. No charge either!

Has that something to do that my Ch was 16? Can it be that the shopkeepers
offer cookies to beautiful ladies (even when they're gnomes)?

--
Sabine
---
The mother-in-law hits!


Tars_Tarkas

unread,
Dec 5, 2002, 1:00:44 PM12/5/02
to
Sabine Blochberger wrote:
> Today in a game of NetHack 3.4 on Win2k I noticed that you can eat the
> fortune cookies off of a shops floor without getting charged!

[ snip ]

> Has that something to do that my Ch was 16? Can it be that the shopkeepers
> offer cookies to beautiful ladies (even when they're gnomes)?

It seems fortune cookies are free food (if you don't pick them up) for
everybody. This also worked for a Cha 6 orcish Barbarian, so I assume it
works regardless of being a beautiful lady or not.

And trying to tame a beautiful lady with a fortune cookie? Does that
work? Did I miss something all the time? ;)
--
GP_Spukgestalt, human Samurai, choked on a tin of spinach.

Dylan O'Donnell

unread,
Dec 5, 2002, 1:22:05 PM12/5/02
to
"Sabine Blochberger" <bloch...@gmx.de-NOSPAM> writes:
> Today in a game of NetHack 3.4 on Win2k I noticed that you can eat the
> fortune cookies off of a shops floor without getting charged!

Known bug SC340-1, "Fixed".

--
: Dylan O'Donnell http://www.spod-central.org/~psmith/ :
: "Now is not this ridiculous, and is not this preposterous? :
: A thorough-paced absurdity -- explain it if you can." :
: -- W.S. Gilbert, "Patience" :

Mike Parrish

unread,
Dec 5, 2002, 4:36:16 PM12/5/02
to
"Sabine Blochberger" <bloch...@gmx.de-NOSPAM> wrote in message
news:3def9125$0$6470$a729...@news.telepac.pt...

>
> Has that something to do that my Ch was 16? Can it be that the shopkeepers
> offer cookies to beautiful ladies (even when they're gnomes)?

-Izhack offers you a brown potion-
-This burns like fire-
-You feel dizzy-
-Would you like to take off your cloak?-
-Izhack helps you off with your clothes-
.
.
.


Tars_Tarkas

unread,
Dec 5, 2002, 4:41:24 PM12/5/02
to
Dylan O'Donnell wrote:
> "Sabine Blochberger" <bloch...@gmx.de-NOSPAM> writes:
>
>>Today in a game of NetHack 3.4 on Win2k I noticed that you can eat the
>>fortune cookies off of a shops floor without getting charged!
>
>
> Known bug SC340-1, "Fixed".

Oh, what a shame. I thought it was a new feature of the game, which
would've made shopkeepers at least partialy nice...
--
GP_Spukgestalt, gnomish Healer, "and then I go get my dragon and ask for
a refund..."

Trebor A. Rude

unread,
Dec 5, 2002, 7:30:03 PM12/5/02
to
Dylan O'Donnell wrote:

> "Sabine Blochberger" <bloch...@gmx.de-NOSPAM> writes:
>> Today in a game of NetHack 3.4 on Win2k I noticed that you can eat the
>> fortune cookies off of a shops floor without getting charged!
>
> Known bug SC340-1, "Fixed".

Not that "fixed" really means anything, since it's been "fixed" for months,
but AFAIK, there's no way to actually USE a fixed version of the
executable, aside from fixing it yourself and re-compiling. How annoying.
Espescially for things like the trap-on-the-VotD-stairs, also listed as
"fixed" for quite some time now.

--
Trebor A. Rude
trebo...@SPAMBGON.attbi.com
Registered Linux User #89308
http://counter.li.org/

Sam Dennis

unread,
Dec 5, 2002, 8:24:28 PM12/5/02
to
Trebor A. Rude wrote:

> Dylan O'Donnell wrote:
>> Known bug SC340-1, "Fixed".
>
> Not that "fixed" really means anything, since it's been "fixed" for months,
> but AFAIK, there's no way to actually USE a fixed version of the
> executable, aside from fixing it yourself and re-compiling.

Or applying a fix that someone else has made available and recompiling.
(Neither step is very difficult, but I'll admit that it adds up to more
work than is acceptable as there are many bugs.)

--
++acr@,ka"

Wilko Frieke

unread,
Dec 6, 2002, 3:34:48 AM12/6/02
to
Tars_Tarkas <Tars_...@ganja.com> wrote in message news:<asoh65$30p$1...@minotaurus.cip.informatik.uni-muenchen.de>...

> Dylan O'Donnell wrote:
> > "Sabine Blochberger" <bloch...@gmx.de-NOSPAM> writes:
> >
> >>Today in a game of NetHack 3.4 on Win2k I noticed that you can eat the
> >>fortune cookies off of a shops floor without getting charged!
> >
> >
> > Known bug SC340-1, "Fixed".
>
> Oh, what a shame. I thought it was a new feature of the game, which
> would've made shopkeepers at least partialy nice...

Maybe a nice idea: If you buy a food item and a potion in a
delicatessen shop, you can get a fortune cookie for free.

Dayv!

unread,
Dec 6, 2002, 11:05:50 AM12/6/02
to
Trebor A. Rude <tre...@powerinter.net> wrote:
>
> Dylan O'Donnell wrote:
>
>> Known bug SC340-1, "Fixed".
>
> Not that "fixed" really means anything, since it's been "fixed" for months,
> but AFAIK, there's no way to actually USE a fixed version of the
> executable, aside from fixing it yourself and re-compiling.

The developers will release the next version of nethack (3.4.1, most
likely) as soon as they feel that it is ready. When they do, all "fixed"
bugs from 3.4.0 should behave as they intend. We can then set about
finding new bugs for them to fix, some of them almost undoubtedly caused
by the fixes to the previous version's bugs.

I love this game.

--
-Dayv!

"Blixa Bargeld stole my Hello Kitty waffle iron!"

SmileyByte

unread,
Dec 6, 2002, 11:50:02 AM12/6/02
to
> Maybe a nice idea: If you buy a food item and a potion in a
> delicatessen shop, you can get a fortune cookie for free.

You bought a food ration for 60 gold pieces. --more--
You bought a blue potion for 50 gold pieces. --more--
The shopkeeper asks: "Do you want fries with that?"


SmileyByte

Nephi

unread,
Dec 6, 2002, 3:43:57 PM12/6/02
to
wilko....@wanadoo.nl (Wilko Frieke) wrote in message news:<e6576073.02120...@posting.google.com>...
[snip discussion of known bug]

> Maybe a nice idea: If you buy a food item and a potion in a
> delicatessen shop, you can get a fortune cookie for free.

Hmm ... Free fortune cookies are traditionally associated with
take-out Chinese food. How about a tin containing szechuan food
giving a free fortune cookie? That would be a lot easier to code then
screwing around with the shopkeeper code ...
<hack,hack>
Announcing Free Fortune Cookie Patch v1.0:
(I'll post it on my website too, for completeness' sake)

--- nethack-3.4.0-orig\src\eat.c Wed Mar 20 15:43:04 2002
+++ nethack-3.4.0-cookie\src\eat.c Fri Dec 06 13:25:13 2002
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@
{"candied", 100},
{"boiled", 50},
{"dried", 55},
+#define SZECHUAN_TIN 10
{"szechuan", 70},
#define FRENCH_FRIED_TIN 11
{"french fried", 40},
@@ -1006,6 +1007,13 @@

You("consume %s %s.", tintxts[r].txt,
mons[tin.tin->corpsenm].mname);
+
+ /* SZECHUAN_TIN might have free fortune cookie */
+ if(r==SZECHUAN_TIN && rn2(2)) {
+ There("is a free fortune cookie inside!");
+ (void)hold_another_object(mksobj(FORTUNE_COOKIE,TRUE,FALSE),
+ "It falls to the floor.",0,0);
+ }

/* KMH, conduct */
u.uconduct.food++;


--
Nephi
"You are covered with bits of fortune cookies."
Check out my patches at http://www.geocities.com/zindorsky

Nan Wang

unread,
Dec 6, 2002, 4:21:50 PM12/6/02
to
Nephi <zind...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> wilko....@wanadoo.nl (Wilko Frieke) wrote in message news:<e6576073.02120...@posting.google.com>...
> [snip discussion of known bug]
>> Maybe a nice idea: If you buy a food item and a potion in a
>> delicatessen shop, you can get a fortune cookie for free.

> Hmm ... Free fortune cookies are traditionally associated with
> take-out Chinese food. How about a tin containing szechuan food

s/Chinese/American/

bd

unread,
Dec 7, 2002, 1:29:28 PM12/7/02
to
Sam Dennis wrote:

Perhaps 'fixed' should link to a patch fixing it?

--
The meek don't want it.

Sam Dennis

unread,
Dec 8, 2002, 3:44:14 PM12/8/02
to

It's possible that the fixes the dev team use can't be easily seperated into
individual patches. Finding, verifying and linking to third-party solutions
would probably take too much time. (And wouldn't you rather they spend that
time working on the next version, anyway?)

--
++acr@,ka"

Dylan O'Donnell

unread,
Dec 9, 2002, 5:33:02 AM12/9/02
to
Jukka Lahtinen <juk...@despammed.com> writes:

> laughing...@yourpain.com (Dayv!) writes:
>
> > likely) as soon as they feel that it is ready. When they do, all "fixed"
> > bugs from 3.4.0 should behave as they intend. We can then set about
> > finding new bugs for them to fix, some of them almost undoubtedly caused
> > by the fixes to the previous version's bugs.
>
> ..and probably some that were already in 3.3.1 but nobody has noticed yet.

Looking at my list, several of the bugs I've reported this time round
were in at least 3.1.3...

(Nothing very serious, admittedly.)

0 new messages