Orange as a failure, Part 1
The Painful Truth about Orange
>>They believe to be professionals because they scream "Micro$hit $ucks"
>
>I don't recall screaming this, please remind me. FYI, I used to run a
>Win2k/Reliable
>setup on orange before I got sick of the hassle of reliables constant need
>for attention
>(most running reliable will concur reliable needs daily if not hourly
>attention often to keep
>things running well). I got fed up and moved to unix/mixmaster, and now
>most problems
>I had fix themselves (thanks to a few scripts). Also I've written many
>Windows based
>remailer "helper" applications... Point being: What are you talking about?
GREAT
I remembered that and I was about to bring the subject but I could not find
references of your pas as a windows-base-remailer Operator.
You proved yourself a failure because you were not able to run a software:
Window/Reliable which is used flawlessly by half the remailers.
Being a failure on window was not trendy.
So you thought maybe being a failure on Linux was more fashionable, and on
a Sparc on top. Isn't you mommy impressed?
And thar nice Ferrari cap you are donning, will you get your driving
licence soon?
So, what are YOU talking about? you were not even able to run properly
Reliable on Windows,
and you put the guilt on Reliable and Windows, not on your own stupidity.
So, what do you mean: "Micro$hit $ucks" or "I am a sucker unable to run
Windows/Reliable"
And none of your stupid experiments at "fixing" what was not broken evet
drew interest from anyone, besides pity.
You got "fed up", you say, maybe your doctor calls you "hyperactive", that
is the fashionable way to say that a person is unable to focus attention
until results are delivered.