Scientology - A Belief System For Criminal Minds - Basic Proof By Their Own Public, Official Doctrine
Leonardo Been
- Basic Proof By Their Own Public, Official Doctrine
17 November 2002
Another Criminal Doctrine (what he calls 'Factor' or 'Logic' or
'Axiom') of L. Ron Hubbard is:
"The particle of Admiration is the highest valued particle there is."
(Not only is it not true - as is known so far, the Life Energy
Particle of Beauty is the highest valued - but what IS true,
is that Admiration is the Life Energy Particle "valued" highly
by Criminal Minds, and that their receiving it is used by them
as a direct indication of their success ...in manipulating,
deceiving and dominating others into submission or, indeed,
into Admiration.)
Further:
"There are three Universes - own, another's and what is agreed upon
to exist and be true by a group of people."
(In other words: "Truth [what really happened or what really
is happening] is 'whatever you manage to make yourself and
others believe'." - In more general terms: "The Creation does
not exist.")
And:
"You can erase incidents of the past, till they are gone."
(In other words: "Truth can be undone." "What crimes they have
done in the past [in past lives] can be made to seem non-
existent, 'never-happened'." "The Creation does not exist.")
(In actual fact, what CAN be undone, is the impingement of
incidents of the past onto the body. Dianetics addresses a few
of these incidents, but specifically forbids and PREVENTS the
detection of incidents caused by L. Ron Hubbard and by his
crew in past lives. Yet it is those that you would want to get
at, if you desire to regain your health or abilities and
talents and awareness of and Love for people.)
Further enforcement of false data to hide crimes and criminal minds:
On the "Secret Upper Levels" those devotees who have proven
(by means of real, formal, paid for "Integrity Checks" or
"Eligibility Checks")
that they will indeed 'never look at Hubbard or his crew and their
actual past,' receive FALSE "Upper Level data" or "Trade Secrets" -
about what Hubbard and his crew want believed they "DID" and "DID NOT
DO" in the distant past (in very distant past lives).
And the devotees are dazed into such a state of unawareness by
all the inconceivably horrendous and extreme lies, that they
are willing to believe anything that "Is said by Ron"
[by L. Ron Hubbard].
And they are made to address the enforcements of these
Delusions,
[Definition of Delusion: An Energetically experienced
Illusion that is projected and intended to be accepted and
acted upon as if it is the "Truth" it pretends to be.]
as if these Delusions were the "real incidents that lie in
their past lives." So it gives seeming relief to those who
had accepted the Delusion as "Reality."
And the very faint similarity with other, previous, past life
deceptions (Delusions, with preceding memory loss enforced in
PAST lives onto the victim) gives the whole subject a
tangibility and feeling of "Reality," that the devotees are
willing to pay for as a "necessity on their scientifically
promised 'Road to Freedom' and 'undreamed of abilities'."
The Delusions can take extreme forms of refusal to face
Hubbard.
Not only as described in their "Trade Secrets" (that are
all over the Internet, even in the handwriting of the
drugged source of them), but also in 'Not Official Hubbard
material' such as the "Sector Nine Materials" written up
from the drugged thoughts of Hubbard by a fully dominated
and manipulated Hubbard-devotee called Bill Robertson.
The practice of Scientology forbids any actual looking at the soul and
the actual past, even in his present life time, of the being L. Ron
Hubbard.
This is very strictly, stringently, furiously, and most debilitatingly
enforced - on students lured by and given life-improvement courses -
who are told, that they will, "for the first time in their entire
existence, receive the whole scientific(!) truth, and only the truth,
of life itself."
And that "Hubbard is the greatest friend (Sorry, I mis-typed it as
'fiend' - that is easily done, but I mean of course "friend") of
Mankind."
This is the most atrocious, debilitating and blinding,
destructive lie that can imaginably be given to anyone. And
indeed, it severely knocks out the awareness and spiritual
sight of people, so horrendously extreme is that lie - so
completely and utterly opposed to actuality it is...
If his devotees happen to be looking at the soul of Hubbard anyway,
or at his hidden lies and hidden intentions, or at the obvious
results of these - even when you are not at all aware yet that these
stem from him - they are first called to commit "Unsupervised
Practice" (depending on how many dollars they still have in their
bank accounts).
Then this looking is called "being harmful to themselves and to
others," and then is called their "Destroying The Technology of
Scientology."
And then it is "proof of them being an Enemy to Mankind."
Much like anyone in Iraq now, who looks at "the great friend
and protector of the people" (at Saddam Hussein), and who,
because the devoted subject sees some of the lies and some
of the crimes, is "an enemy of Iraq and its people, and thereby
an enemy to Mankind."
In the technical part of the Scientology Doctrine, Hubbard did let
his great light shine and found out that a person who looks even
faintly at him or at what he does and intends, or at his lies, must
be called a "List One Rock Slammer" and must be branded a criminal
mind and thrown out of the Scientology Organization!
By his own definition and by the evidence supplied on him
already by his own "spiritual counselors" (Otto Roos, David
Mayo), Hubbard satisfied that definition largely himself.
The devotee who has erred with his attention in the "wrong
direction," is branded a "Potential Trouble Source," or someone
"Perverting The Standard Technology Of Scientology."
(As you see, here they suddenly call it 'Technology' and not
'Doctrine,' not 'Belief System,' not 'Scriptures.')
We continue with enumerating the Doctrine of Scientology as a Doctrine
of Criminal Minds.
Plus:
"The highest purpose in the Universe is the creation of an effect."
(In other words: "There is no good or evil - it's just a
matter of whatever you want to do, and achieving that, what
counts only." - again, "The Creation does not exist.")
Plus:
"Beauty and Ugliness are alike, and just a matter of consideration."
(In other words: "Sell Ugliness AS Beauty, and you have
everyone dominated and manipulated." - "The Creation does not
exist.")
Plus:
"Life is a game of overwhelming others."
(Which is in direct opposition to the nature and intention and
desire of any decent person.
But Scientology - its Founder, to be precise, the creator of
the Doctrine of Scientology - knows better: For him, "The
Creation does not exist.")
And:
"Your survival is proportional to how much others are afraid of you."
(He means, though still incorrectly: "Your survival is
proportional to how much Criminal Minds are afraid of you."
But he does not state that, because he himself is a Criminal
Mind.)
[Definition of Handling Criminals - add: If Criminal Minds
just know that their impulses and activities are not
tolerated, then they don't have to be afraid of you - they
know where they stand and what they can and can not do -
so there is nothing for them to be afraid of.]
Plus:
Love does not exist in the Doctrine of Scientology. And Love is not
practiced.
In place of it, the word 'Affinity' is used, defined as "The desire
to be near an object or a person."
(Affinity - to be near a person who will give or can be
tricked into giving Admiration; to be near a person to suck up
his or her Life Energy. Indeed, there is no Love, or necessity
for Love, in the Scientology Doctrine definition of Affinity.)
And:
The Scientology Doctrine defines 'sex' as the activity of exchanging
Admiration with another.
(Meaning there is absolutely no Ethics to it.
[Definition of Ethics: Real Joy and real Aliveness
encompassing the whole range of Life's activities and its
past and future.]
There is no Ethics to it: Admiration is a dulling Energy much
like drugs, blotting out any reality [Awareness] of truth.
[Definition of Truth: What is, and what happened in the
past and will happen in the future])
By consequence of their rejection of Love:
Hate is not defined in the doctrine of Scientology, but it is
practiced continuously and severely, especially between its
'staff members' who "care for Scientology and its devotees."
And most of its monetary assets obtained from its devotees, are
used to accomplish that Hate, and to cover up the practice of
Hate.
Scientology Doctrine:
"Destroy any 'opponent' utterly and completely, and by any means."
I think it is obvious, by now, what "an opponent" of
Scientology might be like.
This requires some differentiation, however:
While both of the following people are apparent opponents
of Scientology, an opponent of Evil is by definition
good.
But it is still so, that a competitor of Evil is not 'by
definition good.'
And indeed: Mafia members are known to slaughter each
other, as we have amply seen proof of in the "top" of the
Scientology movement.
All the above - which is enumerating the very BASIC, PUBLIC, OFFICIAL,
KNOWN, WRITTEN AND FUNDAMENTAL DOCTRINE OF SCIENTOLOGY - makes
the proof of it being a DOCTRINE OF CRIMINAL MINDS, seem conclusive.
Their BASIC, FUNDAMENTAL, PUBLIC DOCTRINE makes it a "religion" of
Criminal Minds.
If you want to call it a "religion" and buy their pretense,
and with it, the large amount of terminology ('scriptures,'
'parishioners,' 'pastoral counseling,' 'mission,' 'church,'
'religious retreat,' 'donation,' 'belief-structure,'
'religion') that they stole in 1970's from Christians, in
order to camouflage the actual activities and to try and get
protection, and even tax-exemption, as "a Christian religion."
Nevertheless - and indeed as part of their 'Double-Lies' -
[Definition of 'Double- Lie': A method of manipulation and
mind-controlling others - done by knocking out awareness of
another by the first horrendous lie, so that the underlying,
second horrendous lie, is not noticed and not rejected.]
they use Trade Secret, and Copyright, and gag orders, and sealing of
court files, threats to the family members of "opponents," etc.
- very far from Christian.
They even deny the existence of Jesus Christ, in their
lectures, and "Angels never existed." And certainly Satan or
an actual Source of Evil, is something they prevent their
devotees from looking at or for - to their great detriment.
Despite their strictly enforced Christian facade, they use covert,
subversive activities, premeditated and planned, organized, and in
full cognizance of their deeds:
- of planting false evidence and of deliberate inciting to wrongly
directed hate, and
- of preventing exchange of data between the intended victims and
past victims,
- of secretly removing evidence of their crimes from government
offices and court rooms,
- of researching and playing on the basest impulses of their intended
instruments in order to achieve destruction,
all in order to keep the society ignorant of their true nature, and
of the true identity of he who founded Scientology and who made it a
secure hide-out for similar, hidden identities (like past life
genocidal mass murderers).
[These are raw research notes for educational or scientific
purposes - format, embellish, clarify, add and edit, use,
distribute and translate at your discretion - EXCEPT for
the Definitions given, which are copyright 2002 by
Koos Nolst Trenite and may be used unaltered only and
with mention of the author's full name as well as the
date of their writing.]
Brought to you by Koos Nolst Trenite - as a free gift to mankind.
CB Willis
Koos Nolst Trenite (AKA Leonardo Been) wrote regarding some Scn
maxims/beliefs:
> 17 November 2002
My additional comments on the maxims cited, as these maxims such as they
may be, have also always seemed suspect or misleading if not outright
erroneous to me. However we can use consideration of them to see what is
true, "if not that, then what" sort of thing. The problem is, in the
context of the organzation, most participants don't have sufficient
educational and spiritual background available to make the distinctions
for themselves, they are either lacking a basic survey of the best of what
has gone before OR misrepresent and devalue the best of what has gone
before, so have nothing valid to compare to. In other words, their
ignorance is traded heavily on, in order to suggest another position,
which if believed and lived, alters one's universe into a, shall I say,
questionable direction in relation to long term consequences, especially
in comparison to what they could have had otherwise. Historically, scn
will likely be seen as an experiment in "how far can we take this by
tweaking or reversing a few of the core elements of civilization", and
perhaps a later discernment in sorting out the wheat from the chaff.
Dorian had many insights on this process, though I do not agree with his
espoused religious views (or lack of them).
>"The particle of Admiration is the highest valued particle there is."
I feel this particle business is misguided, though *modeling* elements or
pieces of reality in terms of particles (which is a physical universe
model that may not extend fully to metaphysical realities) may have its
uses, or couching certain elements of reality as particle *phenomena*
(which is another way to *model* reality to our awareness while
acknowledging the spiritual and other metaphysical aspects of reality
don't work in the same way as the physical world).
On the subject of admiration, admiration happens, to seek it is an ego
thing. Everyone needs acknowledgement and it is a spiritual joy to praise
the good where we may find it - but that is on the receiving end. It is
not the idea to create something that will be admired by others. We
create anything in life according to our vision and inspiration, and have
to get over or put aside whatever others may think of it, become more or
less indifferent to feedback unless from someone we really should be
listening to such as our teachers, coaches, customers, constituencies.
>Further:
>"There are three Universes - own, another's and what is agreed upon
> to exist and be true by a group of people."
I call these "universes of experience" in reference to spheres of
*experience*, experiences of reality or desired reality.
People can create something that has never existed before, by sharing a
vision and agreeing to create it. Every organization or nation was first
such a vision and agreement, followed by getting the agreement of people
at large.
We don't have to accept all reality as we find it, we can often improve on
what's there, introduce new ideas and creations such as art or inventions
or architecture or projects, and others will "agree" to it at various
points in the process.
BIG agreement regarding the personal computer and life in cyberspace,
for example. All of which was unknown when we were children in this
lifetime and before.
>And:
>"You can erase incidents of the past, till they are gone."
Not sure this is the actual claim, but we can erase charge from traumatic
incidents in the past. Rather, charge is transformed or transmuted by the
movement of spirit. While Spirit is eternal and unchanging in its nature,
there is the phenomenon of what I call "the movement of Spirit", [the
Holy] Spirit prevailing on situations to transform them (hence my emphasis
in past postings on the Holy Spirit), Spirit breaking through and breaking
up old situations and entirely transforming them (Buddhist clear light at
the base). Various light, visual, or felt-sense phenomena often accompany
the healing, seen with spiritual eyes and felt in the energy body.
The term "flattening an incident" is a bit suspect to me, sounds more like
running something into the ground and not always in a good way, more like
getting exhausted but not really exhausting the matter at a deeper level.
>Plus:
>"The highest purpose in the Universe is the creation of an effect."
I always get a chuckle out of this, as the obvious question is, "ANY
effect? " Effects happen, they are by products of something else. We want
good and constructive purposes, excellent effects, not just any old
effect. We are always getting effects, we can't NOT get effects, effects
are constantly being generated by beings and in nature, but the quality of
those effects is all over the map, varies widely from A to Z. Poor quality
is not desirable in itself, only can be USED by us to upgrade our
standards after discerning differences and getting an idea of what may be
possible in the way of improvement or even what it would take to manifest
closer to an ideal.
>Plus:
>"Beauty and Ugliness are alike, and just a matter of consideration."
Sophistic relativism. A reference to the Greek *doxa* or opinion, which
was a derogatory. (Ref: Plato's Myth of the Line, an epistemological
gradient scale of sorts.)
>Plus:
>"Life is a game of overwhelming others."
In a primitive culture. Which we should be well beyond by now.
However use of force can take us all back there to square one,
presumably by one who perversely enjoys to create "effects".
The desire to create "effects" per se, without qualification,
is really primitive.
There are softer variations of the maxim that are workable:
the healthy competition of seeing if you can take someone else's creation
a step better, building a better mousetrap/invention, doing a more perfect
artistic performance. However the attention is better placed on quality
itself than competition. Ending up with a creation better than someone
else's just happens, the focus is on all on the quality and the process,
having the right attitude, being in goodwill.
>And:
>"Your survival is proportional to how much others are afraid of you."
An unwritten maxim. Again primitive, and anti-social. Even people in the
stone age learned how to band together for mutual benefit. You cannot go
around in life being afraid of everyone including friends and family; that
would a non-starter to say the least.
>Plus:
>Love does not exist in the Doctrine of Scientology. And Love is not
>practiced.
>In place of it, the word 'Affinity' is used, defined as "The desire
> to be near an object or a person."
Again a physical, mechanistic model used to talk about an
spiritual-emotional quality. There is defn of affinity given as
"willingness to be close to", so we can look at the willingness aspect,
and transforming unwillingness to be close to can be an improvement much
of the time....but there seems to be the elimination of a spiritual
element here that was present in the best of what went before being based
on the love of God for man and man's love of God (all other love as a
reflection of these). I consider the maxim to contain a key omission and
deletion.
- CBW
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| cbwi...@lightlink.com | "Values are the infrastructure |
| | upon which civilization |
| | will be reinvented." - CBW |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
roger gonnet
roger
"Leonardo Been" <plato...@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
989886.021117...@posting.google.com...
> Scientology - A Belief System For Criminal Minds
> - Basic Proof By Their Own Public, Official Doctrine
>
> 17 November 2002
>
> Another Criminal Doctrine (what he calls 'Factor' or 'Logic' or
> 'Axiom') of L. Ron Hubbard is:
>
> "The particle of Admiration is the highest valued particle there is."
>
> (Not only is it not true - as is known so far, the Life Energy
> Particle of Beauty is the highest valued - but what IS true,
> is that Admiration is the Life Energy Particle "valued" highly
> by Criminal Minds, and that their receiving it is used by them
> as a direct indication of their success ...in manipulating,
> deceiving and dominating others into submission or, indeed,
> into Admiration.)
Further, what elrong preferred was the admiration particle, while saying
elsewhere that one should'nt be loved or admired!
Koos Nolst Trenite
it is the more appreciated.
Koos
"roger gonnet" <gon...@antisectes.net> wrote in message news:<3dd88faa$0$11836$626a...@news.free.fr>...