Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

YALE "TUBBY THE WADDLER" EDEIKEN'S CONVICTION STILL STANDS!!! aka Re: Bradbury Linked To Stupidity

2 views
Skip to first unread message

James Gregory McTavish

unread,
Dec 16, 2003, 10:32:28 AM12/16/03
to
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:49:54 -0700,
<catamont-F2837C...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhi7cvsotqaj3t6btide56jdi44odj5oip%404ax.com&rnum=3&filter=0
>> Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
>> Courthouse Message-ID: <rhi7cvsotqaj3t6bt...@4ax.com>
>> Date: 15 May 2003 17:11:06 GMT
>>
>> Here is what a local newspaper reported concerning one of the shyster
>> Yale F. Edeiken fits of rage at his own county courthouse and his e-mail
>> to me wailing about it being defamatory that it was posted. The truth hurts
>> doesn't it shyster!?
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3921e1e6.182032557%40news.newsguy.com&rnum=1
>> From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
>> Subject: CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
>> Date: 2000/05/17
>> Message-ID: <3921e1e6....@news.newsguy.com>
>>
>> http://www.mcall.com/cgi-bin/slwebsto.cgi?DBLIST=mc90&DOCNUM=39046
>>
>> Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
>> Page: B02
>> Edition: FIFTH
>> Section: LOCAL/REGION
>>
>> Column:
>>
>> Corrections:
>>
>> Memo:
>>
>> CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
>> by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call

What the Jewish swine deleted:

CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call

Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined $600 plus
costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy sheriff and another
man in a courthouse elevator.

During the June 12 incident, Edeiken struck Deputy Brenda Hartman with his
briefcase and allegedly threatened the man by saying he had a gun,
according to District Justice Diane Jepsen, who heard the case. Edeiken
later was found to have a permit for and was carrying a .357 Magnum.

Jepsen ordered Edeiken, whose office is at 39 N. 5th St., to pay the fine
after a hearing Monday on charges of harassment and disorderly conduct
filed by Hartman. Jepsen said Edeiken no longer has a permit for his gun.

According to the complaint, Hartman was in the courthouse side elevator,
which usually is reserved for prisoner transport, with Joanne Keller.
Keller, who was not handcuffed, had just been sentenced and Hartman was
taking her to pay fines and costs before her release.

Also on the elevator were Edeiken, David Raymond, public defender Earl
Supplee and county courier Bill Bichel.

Edeiken told Jepsen that Raymond, a convicted felon who had burglarized
him, pushed his way onto the elevator.

But Jepsen said other witnesses testified that Raymond already was on the
elevator when Edeiken boarded and started a shoving match. Witnesses
varied on what was said.

Witnesses said Edeiken called Hartman a whore, but Edeiken said he was
referring to Keller.

Raymond is a friend of Keller, and Keller once resided at a house owned by
Edeiken. Edeiken was at the courthouse as a character witness for Keller
at her sentencing.

Edeiken swung his briefcase at Raymond, striking him and Hartman,
according to testimony.

Hartman opened the elevator doors on the third floor and ordered Edeiken
to get out. He refused, and as Raymond attempted to exit, Edeiken told
Raymond he had a gun and moved as if he was going to draw it. No weapon
was seen.

Raymond and Supplee then went downstairs for help, and Hartman took
Edeiken and Keller to the bullpen where prisoners are held pending their
proceedings, Jepsen said. Hartman told them to stay until she got help.
When she returned, Edeiken was gone.

---end---

>But this verdict WAS OVERTURNED,

He still did it and after doing some checking around- Yale lied through his fat
ass when he made the following claim:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=OyHG4.1031%245e.96249%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
Date: 2000/04/05
Message-ID: <OyHG4.1031$5e.9...@newshog.newsread.com>#1/1
References: <000c2cb8...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com>

Brimstone <mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:000c2cb8...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com...
> CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION

> Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined
> $600 plus costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy
> sheriff and another man in a courthouse elevator.

Which did not note that the charges were dismissed by Judge Mellenberg
when it was proved that the "vicitm" had just been convicted of burglarizing
my house and had threatened me.

--YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

Archived locally as: JewFavorsJew

Notice that Yale claimed: "..dismissed by Judge Mellenberg when it was proved
that the "vicitm" had just been convicted of burglarizing my house.."

I didn't know Deputy Brenda Hartman who "Edeiken struck with his briefcase" had
"had just been convicted of burglarizing [his] house"! He did strike the deputy
with his briefcase did he not?

Also Yale "Tubby The Waddler" claimed: "the "vicitm" had.. just threatened
[him]." Why didn't any of the other witnesses confirm what Yale claims!? Yale
started it and Yale was the one who went berserk and got convicted for assault!

Special Note December 16, 2003: Another judge just can't overturn a conviction
another judge made! The legal system would really be in turmoil if two district
judges were to overturn each other's convictions. The ONLY way for Tubby to have
had his conviction overturned would have been by a HIGHER COURT! Even then Yale
had no right to act vigilante and assault another person because that person had
burglarized his house.

BTW that conviction was for Yale assaulting the deputy sheriff Brenda Hartman!!

Take note!

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8cgk8901c82%40news1.newsguy.com&rnum=5
Subject: John Morris Confirms Authenticity of: LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER
HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
Date: 2000/04/06
Message-ID: <8cgk8...@news1.newsguy.com>
References: <26b33bde...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=26b33bde...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: YaleAssaultsDeputy)
<7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com>
<1f6neso4j4ujdp6q7...@4ax.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset = US-ASCII

From: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
Organization: University of Alberta
Reply-To: John....@UAlberta.CA
Message-ID: <1f6neso4j4ujdp6q7...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1f6neso4j4ujdp6q7...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: JohnConfirmsYale)

> In <7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
> on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal and
> >now Yale!
:.
> Now? There's one little part "Brimstone" forgot to include, the date
> of the article:
>
> Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
> Page: B02
> Edition: FIFTH
> Section: LOCAL/REGION

Thanks for verifying the authenticity of the article John. Doesn't matter
to me the date it occurred. It establishes that Edeiken gives in to fits
of rage and that is good enough for me as well as any trial held against him.
His history is admissible evidence too you should know!

Lurkers here is the article:

LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT

by VALERIE HILDEBEITEL, The Morning Call

A Lehigh County deputy sheriff has filed harassment charges
against an Allentown attorney over a courthouse confrontation
that happened last month, Sheriff Ron Neimeyer has confirmed.

The charges against attorney Yale F. Edeiken were filed in the
district attorney's office Wednesday, according to the deputy
involved.

Deputy Brenda Hartman said Edeiken shoved her as she was taking
a female prisoner from a courtroom to a holding cell to await
probation processing on the afternoon of June 12.

Hartman said she took the prisoner into an elevator and Edeiken
and another man followed.

The deputy said Edeiken confronted the man, who was later
identified as the woman's ex-husband, and she ordered both to
stop and that one man leave the elevator.

The ex-husband complied and as he exited, Hartman said, Edeiken
shoved her to the back of the elevator and swung his briefcase
at the man.

Sheriff Neimeyer said the deputy reported the incident to him,
and he sent her to the district attorney's office.

"It certainly was conduct that is not expected," Neimeyer said
Friday. "We're on the same side. My officers are officers of the
court, as is Mr. Edeiken.

"We won't brook that type of conduct from anyone else," the
sheriff said. "Why should we (take it) from him?"

---end of article---

Care to verify that this article is authentic as well John?

CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION

by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call

Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined
$600 plus costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy
sheriff...

<<Tavish Comment December 16, 2003: I deleted text which is shown in full
higher up in this post.>>

---end of article---

Thus we have established the legend of Yale "Mad Dog" Edeiken
the terror of the Lehigh County Courthouse!

Need I say more?

Doc Tavish

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~

>Mr. Double Standard.

Where's the double standard you lying whore!? Yale did what he did and there
were plenty of witnesses OTOH I didn't do what Yale accused me of and he
fabricated evidence against me and the case against me was dismissed.
BIG DIFFERENCE YOU STUPID PIG!!

>And that has been pointed out to you numerous times.

Nope it hasn't!

BTW Yale did what he did and there were witnesses BUT I did not do as he accused
and he fabricated evidence against me such as:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>

Excerpt:

>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>
>IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
>CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
>YALE F. EDEIKEN :
> :
>Plaintiff :
> :
>vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
> :
>
>SCOTT BRADBURY
> 24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"You only want to blow Joe
>You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
> Doc Tavish"
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-1."

PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=1201801624195636%40unribbed.net&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: A-1Not1 and A-1Not2)
From: earlt...@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Vapor, Fatelvis, Bull Conner & B9Predator. Prepare for the worst.
Date: 1999/01/08
Message-ID: <12018016...@unribbed.net>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915759892 24.65.203.77
(Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network Canada
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american,alt.flame.niggers
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net

> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: PIN JOE DOWN AND SUCK HIS COCK
> > Isn't strange that Yale has only two little harmless posts to offer
> >in his insane attempts to slander?
>
> If they are harmless why are your associates so upset. Indeed you
> admit that. If they were "harmless" they could not be "slander" (they
> aren't, of course).
>
> > REMEMBER: THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> But I neither fear you or smear you.

you only want to blow joe

you want to suck joes aryan cock dont you yale

~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~

Not sent by me, not signed "Doc Tavish" and it's from a regular ISP too!
That is perjury submitting falsified evidence!

> 31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "So why do you still want to suck his cock?
>Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
>
> Doc Tavish"

PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org&output=gplain
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org
(Archived locally as: A-7Not1 and A-7Not2)
From: Laz <hell...@home.com>
Subject: I'm targeted for what? damn.
Date: 1999/01/05
Message-ID: <09018018...@hexer.org>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915502345 24.2.101.226 (Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25
PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net

> It is now 8 days since this lying nazi bragged that he would have my
> service with enter.net discontinued.
>
> My e-mail address is still ya...@enter.net,
>
> He is still a nazi.
>
> He is still a liar.
>
> He is still a punk.
>
>
> --YFE

so why do you still want to suck his cock

do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood

~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~

Yale got the author and date wrong too and the post was not signed
Doc Tavish as he claimed in his perjured statement. I also never had
an account at the regular ISP used either! CRIMINAL PERJURY!!!

> 34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
>custody until a final solution can be made.
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A11."

PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1B209C3CD.7C009BBF34A90591%40library-proxy.airnews.net&output=gplain
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: A-11Not1 and A-11Not2)
From: Pee Kitty <Pki...@mariner.cris.com>
Subject: Re: Furmanski is lame
Date: 1998/12/20
Message-ID:
<84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net>#1/1
X-Orig-Message-ID: <20129820...@grinding.net>
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun Dec 20 21:15:30 1998
Organization: Digital Highway (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library3
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at dhc.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.newsangels

> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Nizkook Band
> References: <19981207212932...@ng-cb1.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> Message-ID: <366ca...@news3.enter.net>
> Date: 7 Dec 1998 22:57:39 +0500

all nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made

~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~

Once again a post Yale admitted in a sworn statement signed "Doc Tavish"
when it is obvious another person posted it! PERJURY!!!!!

THE FOLLOWING IS THE CROWN OF MANUFACTURING EVIDENCE AND REMEMBER ALL OF THIS
FALSE TESTIMONY WAS SUBMITTED TO A CIVIL COURT AS SWORN STATEMENTS BY CRIMINAL
PERJURER NAMED YALE F. EDEIKEN OF ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA!!

The following false contrived accusation is the pinnacle of perjury or
manufacturing of evidence to be submitted as sworn testimony in a court of law
and this was done by a Plaintiff (who was his own attorney and who is an
attorney) against the Defendant; me. I will slam dunk this criminality in full
just below!

> 39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
>
> --digsig
> Authentic Doc Tavish
>
> 191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
> qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
> 4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-16."

Positive proof 100% that the Plaintiff willfully and most maliciously lied to a
civil court with the above accusation:

Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&output=gplain
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>

39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:

"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish

191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd

Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."

Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken

<end>

Notice what was said in an anonymous post (shown just below) and the date of the
post and compare it to what Yale F. Edeiken charges just above! Remember Yale
claimed I e-mailed the above to him and he claimed I signed it and had my
digital signature and this was done in a sworn document admitted to a civil
court of law!

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=199902171515.KAA08970%40domains.invweb.net
(Archived locally as: AnonIcePick1 and AnonIcePick2)
From: Anonymous (nob...@openpgp.net)
Subject: Re: Joe Bellinger, Proven Liar
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Date: 1999/02/17

> > >>It is thus established that:
> > >>
> > >> - Joe Bellinger stated that he does, in fact, "post deliberate
> > >>misinformation".
> > >> - Joe Bellinger denied having made said statement.
> > >> - Joe Bellinger is, therefore, a liar.
> > >>
> > >>To coin a phrase: GAME, SET, MATCH.
> > >Did anyone expect any different result?
> > LOL! For grown men, you are all so childish.
:
> Expecting some minimal level of honesty -- a low standard which
> you seem incapable of meeting -- is hardly "childish."
>
> It frightens me that, with attitudes like this, you are raising a
> child.
>
> In article <19990112213243...@ng31.aol.com>,
> deb...@aol.com
> (Debunks) wrote: "I post deliberate misinformation . . ."
>
> --YFE

You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!

~~End of GOOGLE aka DejaCom Archive~~

Notice the above was an anonymous post. It was not an e-mail and notice that it
had no digital signature signed by me! Also notice the big difference in dates
the above was posted February 17, 1999 yet Yale accuses me: "That on November
11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic communication stating in
pertinent part (the above EXACT quoted text)"

Witness this:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=6&ic=1&selm=osjdbt41kq8ov7moqagjivihjnda67vadt%404ax.com
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com>

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=96fnp3%242bar%2...@news.tht.net&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: LibelousPerjury)
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.conspiracy
Subject: "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <96fnp3$2bar$1...@news.tht.net>

Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish

191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd

Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."

<stop>

Crypto Kong does not insert blank lines in between "Authentic Doc Tavish"
and the crypto-text as confirmed by the software's author to both myself
and my attorney!

Here is the official reply to my inquiry:

X-Sender: jam...@shell11.ba.best.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:51:20 -0800
To: Scott Bradbury <xx...@flash.net>
From: "James A. Donald"
Subject: Re: Inquiry on Crypto-Kong Signatures
Cc: "Daylin B. Leach - Attorney at Law" <xxx...@aol.com>

--
At 0412 AM 2/23/2001 -0600, Scott Bradbury wrote
> The above forged digital signataure is verbatim and is exactly which was
> presented to the court.

To be presented to the court, it must be alleged to have signed
something. A digital signature without the text that it signed is of no
significance.

(Note: I did not include Yale's fabricated e-mail- I just sent Mr. Donald
the forged digital signature.)

> The digsig also has a blank line in between "Authentic Doc
> Tavish" and the bogus crypto-text. Your software does not do this in
> ANY example I've ever seen.

That is perfectly true. My program does not emit such blank lines, which
suggest fabrication, but not strong evidence of anything much, since the
blank line could have arisen from various accidents in transferring text
from one program to another.

> I do this for the benefit of my attorney. -)

--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GnwV4rmsIA8faEZwt0YOXUiSSJflZjiLd/kTrWIn
4F1jg73LTqhfLPw9BVz2uDGwa7v2WYBG0wNGHSkoM

<END>

--
As for Mr. Donald's statement: "the blank line could have arisen from
various accidents in transferring text from one program to another"-
the above fabricated signature from Edeiken's complaint is verbatim in the
group of false accusations known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE
DEEMED ADMITTED." Notice Mr. Donald's digsig? No spaces and blank lines!
Notice my digsig made on this paragraph alone?

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ejnWmIh1JCyv0DNQedTMFE/cAfXBLuqdxSAkk9w/
4O0CysIswhm2G04W2mJFeW7C7K5RHQkNr3oFBzH6X

NO BLANK LINES AND SPACES!

What are the penalties for submitting manufactured evidence?

[...]

Here is Yale making his false accusation in public forum:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3920d160.112256232%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: YalesLies)
Subject: Yale's Anonymous Post Signed By Me?! What an Oaf! aka Re: Bradbury
Caught in a Psychotic Delusional Rage
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <3920d160....@news.flash.net>

On Tue, 16 May 2000 04:12:22 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<GU3U4.3347$v%5.24...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=GU3U4.3347%24v%255.2...@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: YaleLied1 and YaleLied2)
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...

[...]

>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
:
> It came from you

Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?

>and was signed by you.

Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!

What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Ms1U4.3324%24v%255.238968%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1
Archived locally as: Nradbury1 and Nradbury2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>

(Exact quote for the record)

" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""

No headers and no signature.

I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."

>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE

~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~

PERJURY!!

Remember Sara you did admit this the other day:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=catamont-FB0D63...@news-60.giganews.com&lr=&hl=en
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:58:10 -0600
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Leon Salzman Actionable for Unprofessional Libel? Could Be! Perhaps
I Should Consult with my Local Attorney!!
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
References: <jo0ktvo8vvbs51uja...@4ax.com>
<ge1ktvoqm9b3df3ga...@4ax.com>
<UTqCb.15017$aF2.1...@news20.bellglobal.com>
<0ciktv8tgf9mkah5a...@4ax.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X)
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:57:19 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-FB0D63...@news-60.giganews.com>
(Archived locally as: SaraPerjurAdmits)
EXCERPT

> Here are a some questions I bet you will dodge and they are simple questions!
>
> 1) Is fabricating evidence and submitting it to a civil court a criminal
> offense? Yes or No?

Yes.

~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

What did Yale do when he took other peoples' posts (as the examples above prove)
and sign them as "Doc Tavish" and submit them to a civil court as evidence
against me? What about Yale taking an anonymous post and then making up a phoney
forged "--digsig Authentic Doc Tavish" and submitting it as evidence against me!
What do you call that Sara? The examples above are just a few of many! I am
filing new complaints after the Holidays because I am tired of being defamed by
lies some evil kike fabricated and if I nail his fat lying ass then other people
spreading that libel had better watch out! They know it's lies YET they keep
propagating it and sticking it up to my face!

REMEMBER ALL OF THE ABOVE CRIMINAL FALSIFICATION CAME FROM A BASTARD WHO HAS
ALREADY BEEN PUBLICLY CENSURED BY THE HIGHEST COURT IN HIS STATE!!

I.E.

http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)

Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>

A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)

BTW Sara-- even though you as a pathological bitch liar keep claiming that
lawsuit was truthful and was "accepted as fact" and all based upon me not
replying and Yale getting a judgment against me was completely overturned and
dismissed!

Care to deny these FACTS?

Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).

"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant. The court has
heard telephone messages left on the defendant's answering machine, in which
the plaintiff admits dedicating himself to making the defendant's life a "living
hell." He refers to the defendant as a "miserable piece of shit" among other
charming epithets. The defendant's private medical information, subpoenaed by
Mr. Edeiken finds its way onto the Internet. Even after the defendant is
represented by counsel, mail is still sent directly to the defendant addressed
to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of
the complaint when he first becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You"
via e-mail. In plain English, this is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged
by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never met. The court should not be a party to
this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>

The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself against numerous perjured
false accusations!

CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786

BTW don't forget these:

Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:

<START>

Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.

CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,

IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.

[...]

BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.

<STOP>

IOW for the dull witted; I WON!! CASE CLOSED!! MOVE ON!!!

BTW don't overlook this document either!!

<Start>

September 26, 2001

Yale F. Edeiken
918 N BAYARD ST
Allentown, PA 18104-3759

RE: Yale F. Edeiken, Appellant v. Scott Bradbury et al
1714 EDA 2001

Dear Mr. Edeiken:

This is to advise that the attached Order has been entered in the
above- captioned matters.

A Certified Copy of this Order together with the record will be
sent to the Prothonotary of Lehigh County in due course.

Very truly yours,

(Signed)
David A. Szewczak
Prothonotary

DAS/dag
Attachment
CC: Daylin B. Leach, Esquire
Scott Bradbury
Honorable Edward D. Reibman

The Attachment:

<Start>

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Eastern District Office

Yale F. Edeiken APPELLANT No. 1714 EDA 2001

V.

Scott Bradbury Et Al C.P. Civil Lehigh County
99-C-2786

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2001, the within
appeal is DISMISSED....

PER CURIAM

<STOP>

HARDLY LOOKS LIKE THE COURTS STILL ACCEPTED YALE'S LIES AS FACT DOES IT!?

>So try again.

I just slam dunked you again and proved how you Jews lie through your teeth!
Perjury and submitting fabrcated evidence is a criminal offenses and Yale has
many counts of it too!

>Sara

Tavish

Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT

Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...

[...]

> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you

Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloP...@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

Sara Salzman

unread,
Dec 16, 2003, 6:33:52 PM12/16/03
to
In article <vp4utvcb08st2d7kj...@4ax.com>,
James Gregory McTavish <JG_McT...@NoSpamPlease.net> wrote:


[still dwelling in an event from years ago... can't say he's a winner if
he's still hammering away at it....]

Sara

--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above

Doktor Tavische

unread,
Dec 16, 2003, 8:11:51 PM12/16/03
to
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:33:52 -0700,
<catamont-7B8021...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> lied:

Jesus said to the lying Jews of his days: "You belong to your father, the
devil.. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and
the father of lies." John 8:44

>In article <vp4utvcb08st2d7kj...@4ax.com>,
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=vp4utvcb08st2d7kj...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en

Anyone who clicks the link above can see what the Child of the Father of Lies
ran from!

CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL IDENTIFIED:

John 8:
37 I know you are Abraham's descendants. Yet you are ready to kill me, because
you have no room for my word.
38 I am telling you what I have seen in the Father's presence, and you do what
you have heard from your father."
39 "Abraham is our father," they answered.
40 "If you were Abraham's children," said Jesus, "then you would do the things
Abraham did. As it is, you are determined to kill me, a man who has told you the
truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things.
41 You are doing the things your own father does."
"We are not illegitimate children," they protested. "The only Father we have is
God himself."

The Children of the Devil

42 Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came
from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me.
43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I
say.
44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's
desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for
there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is
a liar and the father of lies.
45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don't
you believe me?
47 He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that
you do not belong to God."
48 The Jews answered him, "Aren't we right in saying that you are a Samaritan
and demon-possessed?"
49 "I am not possessed by a demon," said Jesus, "but I honor my Father and you
dishonor me..

<<The above is irrefutable about who Jesus referred to as the Children of the
Devil.>>

> James Gregory McTavish <JG_McT...@NoSpamPlease.net> wrote:
>
>
>[still dwelling in an event from years ago...

I am still being defamed by Yale's perjury!
I am still being harassed because of Yale's perjury!
I am still being stalked because Yale illegally posting
confidential info he subpoenaed namely my address and
telephone number!

I am still being insulted with FAT remarks because of Yale's
lies and YES- after the Holidays I am re-filing and I will be
able to convince the board the harassment and defamation is
still ongoing!

I will show how I have refuted such defamation YET two web sites
still carry the perjurious libel when it has been made known to
be false and that the complaints were never served which meant
neither my attorney nor myself ever saw them YET you and Ken
McVay decided to post them all over the place after the lawsuit
was dismissed in my favor!

Funny thing that you two were furnished copies of what my attorney
could not get!! What was your motive in posting them in the first
place and why is such still carried by two communist front web
sites-- Nizkor and Anti-Fascism ORGS other than to smear me and put
me in harm's way! Both web sites give out the town, the county, and
the state where I live too!

You want me to add your town, county, and state to my postings concerning your
S&M torture writings? You know I will too!

Proof the two orgs named above are communist fronts:

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=ompjmv8ikp1d1rara...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Paul Kneisel's NYC Based web site ANTI-FASCISM.ORG Advocates Communist
Revolution with NYCT.NET's Approval V3.0 R_0918
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:18:06 -0500
Message-ID: <ompjmv8ikp1d1rara...@4ax.com>

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p0afnvchj52pcuh6c0dk78f9bs7ngfetac%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <p0afnvchj52pcuh6c...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:54 GMT

>can't say he's a winner if he's still hammering away at it....]

I am the winner and I won hands down you lying perjurious bitch BUT I am still
being defamed and harassed by kooks who YOU and Yale let know where I live!

Mark my word: I AM GOING TO DO EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO HAVE EDEIKEN DISBARRED
AND HIS LICENSE REVOKED!!

I am fed up with being smeared by his lies and YOUR lies!

BTW I noticed you still won't deal with the FACT Yale fabricated evidence
against me! WHY IS THAT YOU GOD DAMNED PIG? You even admitted fabricating
evidence is a criminal offense and Yale has many counts of it too! He took
other people's posts and signed them as "Doc Tavish" and then submitted them
to a civil court as "evidence" against me! CARE TO DENY IT YOU GOD DAMNED PIG!?

I.E. Just two examples of Yale's perjury:

>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>
>IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
>CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
>YALE F. EDEIKEN :
> :
>Plaintiff :
> :
>vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
> :
>

That is perjury submitting falsified evidence! Care to prove I ever had an
account with that ISP!?

an account at the ISP used either! CRIMINAL PERJURY!!!

Here is a BONUS example of Yale's perjury against me:

I AM TIRED OF BEING DEFAMED AND HARASSED BECAUSE OF THAT BASTARD'S LIES!!

There have been new elections since my first complaint and we will see what
happens when I re-file anew! Shit like you can't understand why your kind are
despised! People resent filth who tell lies and when they are caught they deny
and vilify!

YALE ALREADY HAS THIS MAJOR STRIKE AGAINST HIM TOO!

http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)

Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>

A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)

BTW The Disciplinary Board was content to give your hero a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nutcase he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Read the report you pig and see how deplorable
your lardass sidekick was/is! Won't take much now to have his law license yanked
will it?

BTW Yale had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and Yale had
received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC CENSURE"
in 1998!!! Looks like your hero is real shining example of the legal profession
doesn't it? Want to deny it pig? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sher4iff should ave done him in- in 1990!

I.E.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3921e1e6.182032557%40news.newsguy.com&rnum=1
From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <3921e1e6....@news.newsguy.com>

http://www.mcall.com/cgi-bin/slwebsto.cgi?DBLIST=mc90&DOCNUM=39046
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
Page: B02
Edition: FIFTH
Section: LOCAL/REGION
Column:

CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION

---end---

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8cgk8901c82%40news1.newsguy.com&rnum=5

---end of article---

Now go fist yourself you ugly whore!

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=93bstvos03c59sall...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She Wrote The
FIST Postings! Message-ID: <93bstvos03c59sall...@4ax.com>
Date: 15 Dec 2003 22:11:53 GMT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p01.infinet.com>
Date: 12 Feb 95 04:19:44 GMT
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Host: p01.infinet.com

By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.

Says so right on the label.

We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.

Your mileage may, of course, vary.

Perrrfect
<END>
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p14.infinet.com>
Date: 11 Feb 95 13:19:07 GMT
References: <3hf46h$p...@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: p14.infinet.com

In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:

> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
>
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.

I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif

>Sara


>
>-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
>is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
>you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!

Notice I called Art Tandy a lying Jew Bastard (which he is) AFTER I had my fill
of his continual verbal abuse! I guess you expect me to not respond to such
abuse in the manner I did which is another reason why Jews are despised. Most
people hate double standards!

The above exchange was a result of this:
<start/quote>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ple4cv8432qih0sft30s5tqi7junbkc0c3%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Anti-Gun Organizations are Jewish ...
Message-ID: <ple4cv8432qih0sft...@4ax.com>
References: <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
On 13 May 2003 21:18:58 -0700, <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
tar...@indystart.com (knight57) wrote:

><deleted unreliable bullshit by the psychotic and chronic liar named
>Fatbury Scumbag>

My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call is all
a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you dirty filthy

lying Jew bastard! <END>
------------------------
Rather than dealing in facts your Jew decided he would rather engage in
name calling and chose to ignore my proofs and it is all fully documented here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rtasbv05mohed914ktef95j9dh3kc11dmr%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Arthur J. Tandy in Denial About Who The Main Gun Grabbers Are!
Message-ID: <rtasbv05mohed914k...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 11:35:17 GMT (Archived as: AJT1)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kf6dcv8pgph2v568bnlhda66md7d4q8bg0%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Arthur J. Tandy's Fellow Jews Are Trying to Extend Their Gun Control!
Message-ID: <kf6dcv8pgph2v568b...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 11:35:17 GMT (Archived as: AJT2)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ple4cv8432qih0sft30s5tqi7junbkc0c3%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Anti-Gun Organizations are Jewish (Classic Repost from January 17,
1997) Message-ID: <ple4cv8432qih0sft...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 May 2003 13:23:47 GMT (Archived as: AJT3)
<end/quote>

>-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
>the bulk of my posts prove so!

Still TRUE and my original postings as a whole are not personal attacks!
The greater majority of Art Tandy's posts are name calling and personal
attacks which seems to be a very common method of reply by Jews and their
gentile USEFUL IDIOTS! Anyone reading the above three archives will see me
presenting many documented facts and in every case Art Tandy would reply
with: "I deny it, you ignorant fat piece of lying shit.. You are a fat lying
ignorant fuck.. Fatboy Turns Blind and runs Away from the Issue.. I am
telling the TRUTH, something you cannot do very well, fatscum.. That
doesn't prove all Jews support gun control, you fucking moron. Your
logic is ridiculous and you are a stupid degenerate lowlife... <deleted
unreliable bullshit by the psychotic and chronic liar named Fatbury Scumbag>"

>You can't discern the difference.
>BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.

Who called names first? It is Okay for Jews to hurl abuse in post after post but
when the recipient gets tired of it and calls the bastard a KIKE then you think
it is ironic or hypocritical. If you Jews don't like being called kikes, swine,
vermin etc, then STOP calling everyone you can't refute names!

> --Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above

No, there is no irony. I will call you obnoxious Jews what you are every time
I've had my abundant fill of your Chutzpa or name calling! If you don't want me
to call you and your fellow Christ Denying Pharisees KIKES or Lying Jew
Bastards/Bitches in reply to your kind's continual insults hurled at me then you
should stop with the name calling! Plain and simple!!

Tavish

Sara Salzman

unread,
Dec 16, 2003, 9:32:40 PM12/16/03
to
In article <8v7vtv4a4d68l1jtm...@4ax.com>,
Doktor Tavische <Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:

[ALTERED AND FORGED HEADERS DELETED, along with all kinds of old crap]

Get a new hobby, Mr. Bradbury. No one cares anymore.

Sara

--

-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!

-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and

the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.


BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.

Doktor Tavische

unread,
Dec 16, 2003, 10:24:08 PM12/16/03
to
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:32:40 -0700,
<catamont-9D7CFD...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>In article <8v7vtv4a4d68l1jtm...@4ax.com>,
> Doktor Tavische <Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
>
>[ALTERED AND FORGED HEADERS DELETED, along with all kinds of old crap]

They weren't altered or forged you lying pig and you know it! And what you call
old crap is your pimp's criminal perjury and his piss poor record as an
attorney! WHO WOULD WANT EDEIKEN AS A PARTNER AT THEIR LAW FIRM WITH A RECORD
LIKE HIS!?

>Get a new hobby, Mr. Bradbury. No one cares anymore.

You do because you keep trying to maintain your pathetic lie!

>Sara

Why don't you show both sides of a two way exchange you slob?

>-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
>is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
>you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!

Notice I called Art Tandy a lying Jew Bastard (which he is) AFTER I had my fill


of his continual verbal abuse! I guess you expect me to not respond to such
abuse in the manner I did which is another reason why Jews are despised. Most
people hate double standards!

The above exchange was a result of this:
<start/quote>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ple4cv8432qih0sft30s5tqi7junbkc0c3%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Anti-Gun Organizations are Jewish ...
Message-ID: <ple4cv8432qih0sft...@4ax.com>
References: <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
On 13 May 2003 21:18:58 -0700, <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
tar...@indystart.com (knight57) wrote:

><deleted unreliable bullshit by the psychotic and chronic liar named
>Fatbury Scumbag>

My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call is all


a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you dirty filthy

lying Jew bastard! <END>
------------------------
Rather than dealing in facts your Jew decided he would rather engage in
name calling and chose to ignore my proofs and it is all fully documented here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rtasbv05mohed914ktef95j9dh3kc11dmr%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Arthur J. Tandy in Denial About Who The Main Gun Grabbers Are!
Message-ID: <rtasbv05mohed914k...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 11:35:17 GMT (Archived as: AJT1)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kf6dcv8pgph2v568bnlhda66md7d4q8bg0%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Arthur J. Tandy's Fellow Jews Are Trying to Extend Their Gun Control!
Message-ID: <kf6dcv8pgph2v568b...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 11:35:17 GMT (Archived as: AJT2)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ple4cv8432qih0sft30s5tqi7junbkc0c3%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Anti-Gun Organizations are Jewish (Classic Repost from January 17,
1997) Message-ID: <ple4cv8432qih0sft...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 May 2003 13:23:47 GMT (Archived as: AJT3)
<end/quote>

>-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and


>the bulk of my posts prove so!

Still TRUE and my original postings as a whole are not personal attacks!


The greater majority of Art Tandy's posts are name calling and personal
attacks which seems to be a very common method of reply by Jews and their
gentile USEFUL IDIOTS! Anyone reading the above three archives will see me
presenting many documented facts and in every case Art Tandy would reply
with: "I deny it, you ignorant fat piece of lying shit.. You are a fat lying
ignorant fuck.. Fatboy Turns Blind and runs Away from the Issue.. I am
telling the TRUTH, something you cannot do very well, fatscum.. That
doesn't prove all Jews support gun control, you fucking moron. Your
logic is ridiculous and you are a stupid degenerate lowlife... <deleted
unreliable bullshit by the psychotic and chronic liar named Fatbury Scumbag>"

>You can't discern the difference.


>BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.

Who called names first? It is Okay for Jews to hurl abuse in post after post but


when the recipient gets tired of it and calls the bastard a KIKE then you think
it is ironic or hypocritical. If you Jews don't like being called kikes, swine,
vermin etc, then STOP calling everyone you can't refute names!

> --Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above

No, there is no irony. I will call you obnoxious Jews what you are every time

Sara Salzman

unread,
Dec 17, 2003, 12:40:33 AM12/17/03
to
In article <bjivtvc7bj3tf9plr...@4ax.com>,
Doktor Tavische <Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:32:40 -0700,
> <catamont-9D7CFD...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <8v7vtv4a4d68l1jtm...@4ax.com>,
> > Doktor Tavische <Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
> >
> >[ALTERED AND FORGED HEADERS DELETED, along with all kinds of old crap]
>
> They weren't altered or forged you lying pig and you know it! And what you
> call
> old crap is your pimp's criminal perjury and his piss poor record as an
> attorney! WHO WOULD WANT EDEIKEN AS A PARTNER AT THEIR LAW FIRM WITH A RECORD
> LIKE HIS!?
>


[ALTERED AND FORGED HEADERS DELETED, along with all kinds of old crap]

--

-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!

-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and

the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.


BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.

Larry Mondelo

unread,
Dec 17, 2003, 2:05:28 PM12/17/03
to
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:40:33 -0700,
<catamont-FF382A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>[ALTERED AND FORGED HEADERS DELETED, along with all kinds of old crap]

They aren't altered or forged you fat pig and you know it! Keep lying and I will
keep exposing it!

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=93bstvos03c59sall...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She Wrote The
FIST Postings! Message-ID: <93bstvos03c59sall...@4ax.com>
Date: 15 Dec 2003 22:11:53 GMT

Tavish

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=8a6vtv8ssbep61qab...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Apartheid Laws in Israel (Different Author Series) V2.0 R_1216
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:04:05 -0600
Message-ID: <8a6vtv8ssbep61qab...@4ax.com>

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=upe9kvor1pdvm2ifa8sfa0qfboa6ull055%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Comparing Israel's "Anti-Christ Activism" to Other Middle East Nations
is NOT a Valid Comparison V2.5 R_0821
Message-ID: <upe9kvor1pdvm2ifa...@4ax.com>
Date: 21 Aug 2003 12:22:34 GMT

Gord McFee

unread,
Dec 17, 2003, 9:07:38 PM12/17/03
to
On 17 Dec 2003 01:11:51 GMT, Doktor Tavische wrote:

> Jesus said

"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you
dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!"

"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my
posts prove so! You can't discern the difference. BTW my name is not
Fatboy you stupid kike."

-- Scott Bradbury, who never calls people names and is an expert in irony

--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time

Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org

Sara Salzman

unread,
Dec 17, 2003, 9:26:07 PM12/17/03
to
In article <p6a1uv87bqchaf0bh...@4ax.com>,
Larry Mondelo <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:40:33 -0700,
> <catamont-FF382A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >[ALTERED AND FORGED HEADERS DELETED, along with all kinds of old crap]
>
> They aren't altered or forged you fat pig and you know it! Keep lying and I
> will
> keep exposing it!
>

[ALTERED AND FORGED HEADERS DELETED]

Sara

0 new messages