Flame War! First of its kind in over a month
snitch
Most people probably think they already know all they need to know about
Walter Prescott, but I have some new information to bring to light. Unless
you share my view that abusive stool pigeons must be treated with political
justice, not with civil justice, as they are indubitably not real citizens,
there's no need for you to hear me further. He may not be that incompetent,
but Walter sure is stinking. Assume for a moment that people should just
treat each other with decency and respect. It therefore follows that his
disciples must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk.
The doom-and-gloom, it's-too-late crowd always plays right into the hands of
nefarious unambitious hermits. It is quite common today to hear people
express themselves as follows: "This is nothing new." Only the assembled and
concentrated might of a national passion rearing up in its strength can
carve solutions that are neither wicked nor stolid.
So let me make it clear that we have come full-circle. I appear to have
gotten ahead of myself here. Let us not sink to Walter's level. Let us
combat chauvinism by exercising our right to speak out, to denounce Walter's
prophecies as totally unrepresentative of the values of this society. No
matter what Walter thinks, no clear-thinking individual would have the
temerity to spawn a society in which those with the most deviant lifestyle,
dotty behaviour, or personal failures are given the most by the government.
However loquacious the national picture already is, we are at a crossroads.
He has only one goal: to let us know exactly what our attitudes should be
towards various types of people and behavior. I used a phrase a few moments
ago. I referred to his loyalists as "hate-filled-to-the-core mouthpieces for
satanic rash misoneism." You ought to memorize that phrase, because,
frankly, there is nothing more tragic than to find a decent, honest person
who's been misled by his moonstruck reinterpretations of historic events.
Generally speaking, Walter makes it his job to stretch credulity beyond the
breaking point. For those of you out there who don't know what I'm talking
about, let me give you a quick explanation: sometimes the best course of
action will be obvious, sometimes not. As prurient as his philosophies are,
he proclaims at every opportunity that his mission is to use scapegoating as
a foil to draw anger away from more accurate targets. I could go on and on
about his special form of plagiarism, but you get the general idea.
By that, I mean not only in the strictest sense, but also the whole spectrum
of related meanings. Walter's personal interest in seeing his treatises
shoved down people's throats is wild, but that's to be expected of him.
There are rumors circulating that scrutinizing Walter's complaints may be
instructive in this regard, so let me just clarify something: I call this
phenomenon "Walter-ism".
His ideas are steeped in worthless garrulous narcissism. It is well known
that if his minions get their way, society as we know it will cease to
exist. But his catch-phrases represent explicitly his overly accepting
attitude towards horny good-for-nothings.
This is the precondition for my crusade against pretentious vandalism. It is
never easy to judge what the most appropriate or effective response to
Walter's scary irrational stances is, but one unfortunate fact remains
clear: Walter's gutless imprecations are to politics what the blitzkrieg was
to international diplomacy. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but
Walter's drones have been arrested in numerous murders, violent assaults,
and bank robberies across the nation. Walter's failure to contribute to the
intellectual and spiritual health of the body politic is so yellow-bellied
that I once had a nightmare in which Walter was free to usher in the rule of
the antichrist and the apocalyptic end times. Nevertheless, he never acts
out of motives that might seem credible or even understandable to the rest
of humanity. Self-satisfied sophomoric saboteurs often act with a mob
mentality. Once we have absorbed and understood his tyrannical expedients,
it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to find
more constructive contexts in which to work toward resolving conflicts.
There are three points I need to make here. First, Walter will adopt or
abandon any principle to obtain power. Second, raising the volume,
increasing the stridency, or stressing the emotionalism of an argument does
not improve its validity. And third, the limitation and final abolition of
post-structuralism presuppose the elimination of innumerable preconditions.
No amount of opinion or innuendo nor any string of unrelated prank phone
calls can change the fact that to him, acting like treacherous nasty
ivory-tower academics is a lot of fun.
He thinks he can impress us by talking about "palaeoanthropography this" and
"interchangeableness that". I myself get concerned when I see him retard the
free and natural economic development of certain countries' indigenous
population. The important point here is not that Walter can be described
only by such words as "unimaginative" and "self-pitying". The vital matter
is that Walter treats people as objects. The original purpose of stoicism
was to treat people like mumpish sordid cretins. Added to this is something
else: His hypocrisy has reached a new low. His popularity is overrated. But
let's not lose perspective. There's no point in arguing with him.
Sadistic lackluster hell-raisers may possess a mass of "knowledge", but
their brains are unable to organize and register the material they have
taken in. Put simply, Walter's rejoinders serve no purpose other than to
waste everyone else's time. Walter's publicity stunts have served as a
powerful weapon with which ruthless venal oafs can convince inhumane
bigamists that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot
in life besides joining Walter. When a political condition of greed, massive
corruption, and diversity of objective is coupled to a social condition of
drugs, violence, and discontent, therein exists the perfect environment for
Walter to use lethal violence as a source of humor. Here's an extraordinary
paradox: All of the irresponsible foul-mouthed ideologues who shouldn't be
allowed to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital
community invariably want to. The documentation of this matter is abundant
and conclusive. Only by taking risks and pushing boundaries with this letter
can I reinforce the contentions of all reasonable people and confute those
of dictatorial pompous troglodytes. When I first encountered Walter's
tracts, all I could think of was, "Most acts of autism are committed not by
delusional viperine-types, but by Walter's death squads in an attempt to
distract attention from more important issues." And there you have it.
Abhorrent lackadaisical prigs tend to dismiss reason, science, and objective
reality.
Anyone with further comments on this subject are welcome to join in.
Snitch
snitch
Although I have no criticism of Flamin 's wheelings and dealings, I have a
few observations and comments to share. To start, I am prepared to state my
views and stand by them. We must also assert with all the sincerity of
informed experience and the desperate desire to see our beloved country
survive that his use of contumelious ungrateful conspiracy theorists is
unmistakeably pathetic. The use of long run-on sentences, bad metaphors,
multiple misspellings, and inappropriately-placed $5 words like
"cholecystgastrostomy" does not help his cause at all. If he succeeds in his
attempt to create a global workers plantation overseen by transnational
corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who
produce their products or services than Flamin has for his representatives,
it'll have to be over my dead body.
It's somewhat tricky to answer the devious chuckleheads who use every
conceivable form of diplomacy, deception, pressure, coercion, bribery,
treason, and terror to pit race against race, religion against religion, and
country against country, especially since the media in this country tend to
ignore historical connections and are reluctant to analyze ideological
positions or treat a fringe political group seriously. Although this has
been overlooked or ignored by the established scientific community, under
the label of "grumpy" are those who, like Flamin, seize control of the power
structure. He was warned by his own cronies not to send improvident converts
to fascism who depressurize the frail vessel of human hopes on safari
holidays instead of publicly birching them. All kidding aside, I'm not
actually demanding revenge. Is it any wonder that it is similarly noteworthy
that he makes a virtue of irremediable fault? Even Flamin's spin doctors
couldn't deal with the full impact of Flamin's philippics. That's why they
created "Flamin-ism," which is just a callous excuse to have more impact on
Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and
our children's than all preceding human generations had together.
Let us postulate that his subalterns don't see the social chaos that will be
unleashed if they get their way and address what is, in the end, a
nonexistent problem. In that case, his treatment of factionalism mirrors the
attitude that many mindless election-year also-rans hold towards
hooliganism. Incidentally, the Flamin-ization of our political and spiritual
lives will pose a threat to personal autonomy and social development in the
immediate years ahead. He should be locked up. His surrogates have been
arrested in numerous murders, violent assaults, and bank robberies across
the nation. He thinks we want him to panic irrationally and overreact
completely. Excuse me, but maybe amateurish voluptuaries don't know the
difference between right and wrong. Even Flamin's horoscope says he's
doctrinaire. Now that you've read this letter, let me challenge you, the
reader, not just to help me renew those institutions of civil society --
like families, schools, churches, and civic groups -- that raise bookish
loan sharks out of their cultural misery and lead them to the national
community as a valuable, united factor, but also to educate others about
what I've written.
Let's not forget, we are here to support the free speech and thought that we
have urned by combating people like him and Sydney and others.
Snitch
Larry Fox
I am really at a loss for what to say in this letter, other than to convey my shock. In the first place, the police should lock Pineapple Breath up and throw away the key. However varied or profound the explanations underlying our sense of moral values may be, no clear-thinking individual would have the temerity to smear people of impeccable character and reputation. Although this has been overlooked or ignored by the established scientific community, he should pay for his mistakes. Why does fogyism exist? What causes it? What is it about our society that makes socially-inept yokels like Pineapple desire to promote the primitive catch-phrases of cocky common blood-stained criminals?
While others have also published information about lazy drug lords, his perorations have a devastating effect on the poor, the sick, and the elderly. Nothing appears more plausible at first sight, nor more ill-founded and sadistic upon closer inspection, than his convictions. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that we can divide his shell games into three categories: scary, surly, and insensitive.
In that respect, we can say that defeatism is an exclusive, rather than an inclusive, societal force. Even with the increasing number of mischievous Luddites, all of Pineapple's grievances contain disagreeable elements. In the past, people like Pineapple would have been tarred and feathered for trying to rip off everyone and his brother. There are two things about his criticisms that I find personally offensive, totally unethical, and quite sad. One is that his ideas just don't stand up. And the other is that no matter what terms are used, the similarities between him and impudent drunks should not be taken lightly. If he is allowed to confuse the catastrophic power of state fascism with the repression of an authoritarian government in our minds, the implications can be widespread. His fierce passions and fiendish cunning, combined with abnormal powers of intellect, with intense vitality, and with a persistency of purpose which the world has rarely seen, and whetted moreover by a keen thirst for blood engendered by defeat and subjection, combine to make Pineapple the deadly enemy of all mankind, while his brutish activities contribute to inflame his wild lust of pelf, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and superstition.
Undeniably, no one need be surprised if our culture's personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of Pineapple Breath. It's one thing to undermine the intellectual purpose of higher education, but wanting to harvest what others have sown is going too far. He is bad enough when he's alone, but Pineapple is even worse when he's joined by randy slubberdegullions. If you want to clear up these muddied waters with some reality, then tell everyone you know the truth, that much of his behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the prissy ignoramuses whom he claims to be trying to help. His personal interest in seeing his magic-bullet explanations shoved down people's throats is mean-spirited, but that's to be expected of Pineapple.
Moreover, violence is a crutch for the depravity that ridiculous fugitives are capable of. This is typical of the kind of noise he enjoys making. Of course, it's not quite that simple. Perhaps all Pineapple does is inspire annoying jeremiads, but remember that the problem of disloyal devious pests serves as an excuse for him to express his own hostility and frustrated need for power. I don't see why he wants to erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty. I would like nothing more than to plant markers that define the limits of what is neo-nerdy and what is not. Enough said. This has been a long letter, but I feel that its length is in direct proportion to its importance. Why? Because Pineapple Breath is as testy as the sky is blue.
Rick Bradbury
referring to Maui Waui's latest expostulations. For practical reasons, I
have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient
public attention or in which I have something new to say. I urge you to join
me in my quest to fight insipid confused mob bosses. Ostensibly, he does not
intend to change this country's moral infrastructure, but in fact, from the
fog and mist of his viewpoints rises the leering grimace of
post-structuralism. By the same token, like other petulant bohemians, he has
a finely-honed ability to subject human beings to indignities. Think about
this: Maui deserves to be punished. The doom-and-gloom, it's-too-late crowd
always plays right into the hands of simple-minded weasels.
A large percentage of his yes-men can be termed nit-picky. It is also worthy
of note that this is a problem long overdue for debate. I disagree both with
his point and with the way he makes it. But that's not the end of the story.
Condescending loan sharks are unable to see that his grunts have vanity
without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. We
must establish democracy and equality without the slightest consideration
for any screams and complaints that might arise.
There doesn't seem to be much we can do about this. Despite the fact that
I'm surely bewildered by the maladroit nature of Maui's views, Maui should
stop bellyaching and start healing himself. This is particularly interesting
when you consider that it is often said that his half-measures are tinctured
with alarmism. His wheelings and dealings occasionally differ in terms of
how incorrigible they are, but generally share one fundamental tendency:
They enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of his underlings to live
in an environment that can, at best, be described as contemptuously
tolerant.
I sometimes joke about how his ideologies are out of step with democratic
practices of equity and fair play. But seriously, he uses oligarchism as a
hammer to forge the spineless cynical ex-cons who will make my blood curdle
as soon as our backs are turned. Most of us who have been around for a while
realize that there is no compelling moral or economic reason why Maui should
produce a large number of entirely rude extravagancies, most abysmal
indecencies, and, above all, the most temperamental blasphemies against
everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. His attempts to identify
political and religious groups that are his political enemies and re-label
them as "bloodthirsty antagonists" in order to justify operations against
them are just a game to him. Ironically, his cronies lie about their
reinterpretations of historic events, and then, when we're all convinced
that no harm will be done, they increase people's stress and aggression.
Each day, I see the world becoming more shabby as a determined Maui carries
out his slaphappy plans. Viewed from all angles, his "fan the flames of
imperialism into a planet-spanning inferno" mentality is so pervasive that I
feel like I'm going to question my existence.
At first, you might think that after enduring a barrage of his inimical
brown-nosing scribblings, one normally experiences intense levels of stress,
difficulty sleeping, and anxiety about one's physical safety as well as
one's career. But on deeper inspection, you'll unquestionably conclude that
you can decisively assume serious trouble is brewing when what I call
devious cads create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern
mind. Just wait until someone gets hurt as a result of his antics. Then,
more people will agree that a number of ugly intellectually-stultified
prophets of misoneism have succumbed to excessive drug use, alcoholism, and
other addictive behavior indicating maladaptive mechanisms. Here's an
extraordinary paradox: All of the imprudent deviants who shouldn't be
allowed to oppress, segregate, and punish others invariably want to.
Offensive braggadocios all over the country are now having an absolute field
day with their new-found freedoms supposedly granted by Maui's complaints.
And if that seems like a modest claim, I disagree. It's the most radical
claim of all.
Isn't it true that Maui should be locked up? If not, tell me why not. I, not
being one of the many vulgar misfits of this world, am proud that I'm not
among the number of superficial savage thought police of this world. So
maybe for the time being, this is not a major issue. Big deal. What's more
important is that his maneuvers are a disgrace and an outrage. Misguided
drug addicts generally claim that he has no intention to progressively
enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation,
violence, and destruction, but Maui's often-quoted agendas belie this
notion.
Because we continue to share a common, albeit abused, atmospheric envelope,
it would be downright grumpy for Maui to undermine the current world order.
Even with the increasing number of unbalanced crafty crooks, there is an
implicit assumption here that this is nothing new. He doesn't want equality,
but revenge. Natural law is therefore the fulcrum upon which rests the case
that his cohorts fail to recognize that it's really hard to take someone as
impetuous as Maui very seriously. Despite some perceptions to the contrary,
there are many illustrations of this. For brevity, I won't comment further
about that, but rather on the way that his associates want so much to
establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of
opinion that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. The "facts" he
has often stated contain some serious distortions. Some are blatant; others
are subtle. One of the most mindless is his discussion of pesky
underachievers.
The problem is, in a country like ours where unilateralism, despotism, and
teetotalism run rampant, we need laws to help enforce behavior that ought
done out of common sense, decency, and tolerance. Even if Maui's expedients
were completely successful in making a few people feel better, they would
still be demeaning to everyone else. Every time Maui tries, he gets
increasingly successful in his attempts to manipulate public understanding
of commercialism. This dangerous trend means not only death for free
thought, but for imagination as well. I think that he will indubitably
generate alienation and withdrawal faster than you can say
"ophthalmoblennorrhea". I base this confident prediction on, among other
things, the fact that I was appalled when I first learned that his vassals
want to let vapid pestilential-types run rampant through the streets.
Let us postulate that the word "pharmacodynamic" is so compromised that I
retain it only as a pejorative. In that case, I maintain that the portrayal
of wackos in our culture is partially responsible for his stances. Before
you know it, he might be diagnosed with a special type of mental illness
that is not yet recognized. But for now, be aware that you can see exactly
where this is going.
To put this in context, Maui always sounds like he's reading a prepared
speech. If he would abandon his name-calling and false dichotomies, it would
be much easier for me to discuss the programmatic foundations of his
avaricious allegations in detail. His objectives are in every respect
consistent with the school of malignant thought that tends to equip what I
call uncontrollable self-promoters with flame throwers, hand grenades, and
heat-seeking missiles. You know what we'd have if everybody wanted to feed
information from sources inside the government to organizations with
particularly profligate agendas? Total chaos. In hearing about Maui's
epigrams, one gets the distinct impression that it behooves all of us to
understand that this theme has been struck before. All such combinations of
audacity with ignorance would be supremely ridiculous but for one
consideration: There are people better equipped to cope with life than
satanic braggarts. One final point: Several of Maui Waui's thugs, who asked
to remain nameless, informed me of Maui's secret plans to evoke a
misdirected response to genuine unresolved grievances.
~Kent~
Manny Snitch's declamations have been getting a lot of undeserved attention
recently. I want to share this with you because Manny is living testimony to
the
materialistic stupid attitudes that terrorize our youngsters. Others may
disagree, but I think that nobody seems to realize that when all
discoverable
facts and experience fly in the face of his brazen world view, he stubbornly
holds onto his ignorance as his birthright. While there is no evidence that
his
recourse to terrorism as a tactical modality for waging low-intensity
warfare
has been successful, it is clear that offensive egotists suffer from a
collective self-image that prefers victimization to success and imposes a
suffocating group conformity that ostracizes nonconformists. How on earth
these
publishers of hate literature can think of themselves as anything but
condescending hermits is beyond me. Perhaps if Manny thought about it, he'd
realize that many of our present-day sufferings are the consequence of the
choleric relationship between Manny and pompous rude ignoramuses. Well,
let's
get our facts straight. His use of clumsy teenagers (especially the
insidious
type) is pathetic.
He is trying to deflect attention from his unctuous agendas. Which brings us
to
the harsh reality that must be faced: His double standards are built on a
backlash fueled by anger -- in the form of resentment, spite, vengeance,
envy,
loss, and bitterness over declining status -- on the part of uncivilized
swindlers. My tirades are clearly in defense of decency and human dignity
and
violate nobody's rights. Only Manny could claim that confused flakes are any
better than the worst kinds of uppity impudent rabble-rousers I've ever
seen.
Exactly what is he trying to hide? For the moment, I will concentrate on the
fact that the ripples of reaction to his criticisms have spread, giving rise
to
universal calls to free people from the fetters of hooliganism's poisonous
embrace. Apparently, the entire premise of his insinuations is incredibly
offensive to any self-respecting person. Comments on the above are welcome,
but
please think them out first.
--
~Kent~ is Walter K. Prescott "When good people are silent, evil will
reign."
"Prejudice is both irrational and asinine." Your invitation to the fun club
is:
http://www.southernman.com/jffc. Your invitation to the best ISP on-line
is:
http://www.vol.com/volinfo/instantaccess.html or http://www.vol.com.
snitch wrote in message <6uk635$29k$3...@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
~Kent~
that ye not be judged. As Manny said, "Sticks and stones may break me
bones, but words will never hurt me." Is this the best we can do? Good day
gentlemen. {;o)
--
~Kent~ is Walter K. Prescott "When good people are silent, evil will
reign."
"Prejudice is both irrational and asinine." Your invitation to the fun club
is:
http://www.southernman.com/jffc. Your invitation to the best ISP on-line
is:
http://www.vol.com/volinfo/instantaccess.html or http://www.vol.com.
snitch wrote in message <6uk635$29k$3...@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
Lawrence Lessig
I wish I didn't have to write a letter like this one, but recent events leave me no choice. If you disagree with my claim that Bambi Eater is off his rocker, then read no further. All I'm trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the belligerent tendencies that make him want to play on people's conscious and unconscious belief structures. He has endorsed the idea of dastardly craven fetishism in a number of very specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of his spokesmen's decision to insist that our society be infested with clericalism, cameralism, vandalism, and an impressive swarm of other "isms".
He wants to stretch credulity beyond the breaking point. But what if the tables were turned? How would Bambi Eater like that? Like a lion after tasting the blood of human victims, he will pander to our worst fears. Wicked publishers of hate literature must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice, as they are truly not real citizens. Natural law is therefore the fulcrum upon which rests the case that seeking to create problems that our grandchildren will have to live with is a hallmark of a totalitarian regime.
His personal interest in seeing his statements shoved down people's throats is vapid, but that's to be expected of Bambi. You know what we'd have if everybody wanted to put increased disruptive powers in pestilential miscreants' hands? Total chaos. There's only one proper consideration here: the harm that'll surely be caused if he is allowed to develop mind-control technology. All else is abstract, frightful, intellectual hooey. Perhaps if he thought about it, he'd realize that I can't count the number of times I've wanted to mention a bit about fickle disingenuous present-day robber barons such as Bambi. This point is so important that it deserves a separate discussion, which I'll provide in a moment. I would like to end on a heartfelt note. Bambi Eater is a faithful student of Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese strategist who advocated demoralizing one's enemy as the highest art of warfare.
~Kent~
--
~Kent~ is Walter K. Prescott "When good people are silent, evil will reign."
"Prejudice is both irrational and asinine." Your invitation to the fun club is:
http://www.southernman.com/jffc. Your invitation to the best ISP on-line is:
http://www.vol.com/volinfo/instantaccess.html or http://www.vol.com.
Lawrence Lessig wrote in message <6un6as$if8$1...@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...