Now I try to be amused (was Re: I Used to Be Disgusted)
Stephen Boursy
Bruce Ediger <bed...@csn.net> wrote:
>
>bou...@alt.net wrote (about usenet article cancels):
>
>> Yet you condemn Hipcrime but do not do the same
>>of Chris Lewis or Rebecca (god bless her). That's quite
>>a double standard. One is no more or less legitimate
>>than the other.
>
>Sure they are.
No they are not. Now if you had to choose
degrees of legitimacy you'd choose Lewis and I'd
choose Hipcrime but we'd both be wrong.
>The ones Lewis and (I presume) Rebecca issue cancel
>N-1 of some substantially identical postings, where N is
>some large number.
Not the case with Chris Lewis. Take a look
at the many cancels by Mr. Bellomy issued with the
full support of Lewis--note the failure of Dave the
Resurrector on these content cancels and the past
objection to Lewis's partisain politics over this.
Lewis has engaged himself in may content cancels--
especially with the good Dr. Grubor that completely
disregarding this 'N' number nonsense and he's
presently engaged in NoCems which are purely
content based directed against those he personally
doesn't like.
Not to mention his admission of the
Dnynasour/SP files which completely undermined
any crediblity for those relectant to think so.
Only fanatics could offer any support to this
man at this point (and we need not bring up
his absolute obession with the good Dr. Grubor.
>HipCrime's cancels, on the other hand, delete individual
>posts, posts that don't have N-1 identical copies spammed
As do Mr. Rosenthals posts--purely based on
content and with the full support of Mr. Lewis.
Before you issue your standard response please
take the time to investigate the discourse between
Jerry and Henrietta in news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
on the subject.
Steve
news.admin.censorship
Hillary Clinton
bou...@shell.thecia.net (Stephen Boursy) wrote:
-
-Bruce Ediger <bed...@csn.net> wrote:
->
->bou...@alt.net wrote (about usenet article cancels):
->
->> Yet you condemn Hipcrime but do not do the same
->>of Chris Lewis or Rebecca (god bless her). That's quite
->>a double standard. One is no more or less legitimate
->>than the other.
->
->Sure they are.
-
-
- No they are not. Now if you had to choose
-degrees of legitimacy you'd choose Lewis and I'd
-choose Hipcrime but we'd both be wrong.
-
-
->The ones Lewis and (I presume) Rebecca issue cancel
->N-1 of some substantially identical postings, where N is
->some large number.
-
-
- Not the case with Chris Lewis. Take a look
-at the many cancels by Mr. Bellomy issued with the
Minor correction here--I meant to say the forged
content cancels by Mr. Rosenthal--Mr. Bellomy was
the former VP at flash.net who just lent his support
to the practice.
Steve
news.admin.censorship
-full support of Lewis--note the failure of Dave the
-Resurrector on these content cancels and the past
-objection to Lewis's partisain politics over this.
-Lewis has engaged himself in may content cancels--
-especially with the good Dr. Grubor that completely
-disregarding this 'N' number nonsense and he's
-presently engaged in NoCems which are purely
-content based directed against those he personally
-doesn't like.
-
- Not to mention his admission of the
-Dnynasour/SP files which completely undermined
-any crediblity for those relectant to think so.
-Only fanatics could offer any support to this
-man at this point (and we need not bring up
-his absolute obession with the good Dr. Grubor.
-
-
->HipCrime's cancels, on the other hand, delete individual
->posts, posts that don't have N-1 identical copies spammed
-
-
- As do Mr. Rosenthals posts--purely based on
-content and with the full support of Mr. Lewis.
-
- Before you issue your standard response please
-take the time to investigate the discourse between
-Jerry and Henrietta in news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
-on the subject.
-
- Steve
- news.admin.censorship
-