>VISIT FAT BASTARD SCOTT BRADBURY.
Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post where
the people live who made such info public in the first place!
Sara Salzman
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
4015 S Killarney Way
Aurora, Colorado 80013
http://kevdb.infospace.com/_1_26U9TCS04PZEGED__home/wp/detail/kevdb?KCFG=us&OTMPL=/wp/results_detail.htm&FF=1&QFM=N&QN=Salzman&QF=&QC=Aurora&QS=co&actnav=org&TQA=4015+S+Killarney+Way&TQC=aurora&TQS=co&QP=&QST=&QHN=&wqp=&QZ=80013&QK=1&QO=us&QD=&DM=751&&QI=0&jnum=1&jindex=0
(Archived locally as: infospace_Ssalzman)>>Public Information<<
I am being harassed by having my confidential information being posted along
with death threats, forged child porn ads being posted which give out my address
etc., having phoney sex offender lists posted which give out my address, having
magazine and catalog subscriptions forged in my identity etc. FOR A FACT it was
Yale F. Edeiken and Yale F. Edeiken alone who subpoenaed my confidential info
from my ISP and made the subpoenaed info public-- now let him receive justice
under the Law of Moses:
Just as has been done to me and is still being done to me and solely because
of Yale F. Edeiken exclusively I will apply the LAW he claims to observe to him:
Leviticus 24:19-20 :: New International Version (NIV)
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him:
20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the
other, so he is to be injured.
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard St
Allentown PA 18104
Tel 610 435-9820
(Source: Court documents)
If Yale does not like getting back in kind what he has dished out in kind
under the Law of Moses then he should either:
1) Re-file his nut case lawsuit in the proper jurisdiction and get charged with
numerous criminal counts of perjury and legal system abuse
OR
2) Encourage his THUG allies to stop harassing me and invading my privacy!
The choice is his!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-1605042226560001%40ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net&rnum=1
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: Yale Now Admits To Distributing Subpoenaed Information to a Group
of People... Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <catamont-160...@ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net>
>On Wed, 17 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
><iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>
>>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>>news:3921f38a....@news.flash.net...
:.
>>> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
>>> get my unlisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
>>> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
:.
>> None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
>>group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
:.
>So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a
>group of people..."
>
>Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
>
>The "something" you mailed to a group of people was confidential
>information obtained using a subpoena. What you have confessed to is
>illegal activity!
Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
Check. Certified. or Jumpsuit.
The choice is yours.
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Who became so famous with a reputation so great,
That he ran for president and didn't carry a state?
Why it was Jubilation T. Cornpone; Old "Wouldn't be sworn - pone."
Jubilation T. Cornpone, he made the country wait!
--
My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
When it seemed like our brave boys would keep on fighting for months,
Who took pity on them and capitulated at once?
Why it was Jubilation T. Cornpone; Unshaven and shorn - pone.
Jubilation T. Cornpone, he weren't nobody's dunce!
And did you tell your DA that you're still posting my address?
>And did you tell your DA that you're still posting my address?
I will leave that up to you! :-)
Tavish
>On 31 Jul 2003 19:59:00 GMT,
><catamont-5E4E75...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>And did you tell your DA that you're still posting my address?
>I will leave that up to you! :-)
What a surprise -- Fatbury not willing to own up to his own actions.
-PLH, no wonder he cut and ran last week when we came to town
Say what you want Patrick. I don't really care too much about your trolls
anymore. BTW how could I cut and run when I was already gone before Sara showed
up unannounced? I had personal business I had to handle. Look and check the
dates and you will see I was not online for almost seven days starting the
preceding Sunday before the Tuesday visit your two made to my fine hamlet. I
have nothing to fear from either of you and as I already told Sara before that
preceding weekend-- I only wanted to see her in court and not in person to here
her rants! I can read enough of it online thank you!
Remember this?
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the
harassment I have been subjected to because of my address being distributed and
the info being used criminally. I want Yale to state his motive for subpoenaing
my medical record and then lying about what it stated. I will show copies to the
jury and have Yale explain how he deduced it stated "morbid obesity" and that I
weighed well over 300 pounds when there are no height nor weight fields on it
and the diagnosis was: "sleep apnea, narcolepsy, vertigo." I want YOU to explain
why the telephone number YOU distributed was different than the one the subpoena
stated and how YOU knew it seeing how it was unlisted number. I want YOU and
Yale to prove what I ever actually did to either of you that I deserve all of
the ill treatment I have been subjected to because of legal system abuse. I want
YOU and Yale to explain why I am accountable for what a person in another state
and another country allegedly did so that I get harassed as a proxy of your
vindictiveness. I want YOU to explain why I, nor David Michael, or our attorneys
were never served with the complaints against us YET after the lawsuit was
dismissed in my favor then the "complaints" were posted and distributed giving
out my address and new telephone number. I want YOU to tell a jury of my peers
what the purpose was for YOU to do that to me. IF YOU TWO GOD DAMNED VILE EVIL
SHITS DON'T RE-FILE THEN LET IT BE KNOWN FOREVER THAT YOU TWO ARE COWARDS
AND THAT LAWSUIT HAD NO REAL VALIDITY IN THE FIRST PLACE!! IF YOU DON'T DO ALL
OF THIS THEN IT IS YOU AND YALE WHO ARE THE COWARDS!! MAKE YOUR SAME ACCUSATIONS
TO MY FACE IN FRONT OF A JURY OF MY PEERS AT MY COURTHOUSE IN MY JURISDICTION!!
ARE YOU UP TO IT YOU PERJURIOUS COWARD!?
<END>
There is no mention about having a face to face pow wow! If Sara and/or Yale
have problems then let them re-file and we will get it settled once and for all
in court and I am most positive of the outcome being in my favor!
>On 31 Jul 2003 16:00:37 -0500, <szk8yqe...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>Sean Cyril O'Tavish <Sean_Cyril_O'Tav...@IRISH-TAVISH-CENTRAL.NET> writes:
>>>On 31 Jul 2003 19:59:00 GMT,
>>><catamont-5E4E75...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>>>And did you tell your DA that you're still posting my address?
>>>I will leave that up to you! :-)
>>What a surprise -- Fatbury not willing to own up to his own actions.
>>
>>-PLH, no wonder he cut and ran last week when we came to town
>Say what you want Patrick. I don't really care too much about your trolls
>anymore. BTW how could I cut and run when I was already gone before Sara
>showed up unannounced? I had personal business I had to handle. Look and
>check the dates and you will see I was not online for almost seven days
>starting the preceding Sunday before the Tuesday visit your two made to my
>fine hamlet. I have nothing to fear from either of you and as I already told
>Sara before that preceding weekend-- I only wanted to see her in court and
>not in person to here her rants! I can read enough of it online thank you!
Bullshit, Scott. You said yourself: "Anytime[sic] and any day. The place:
my local courthouse (my jurisdiction)." Sara made no secret of when she'd be
there, and you had the chance of your life to present YOUR "case" to the DA.
You cut and ran like the quintessential cowardly bully you are, Bubba.
Obviously, you don't believe in your "case" very much if you can't be bothered
to actually show up with it because someone *might* be present who'd laugh in
your ugly face. Funny how your "personal business" claim didn't surface until
AFTER your yellow belly was pointed out, isn't it?
>Remember this?
[Bradburyectomy]
>There is no mention about having a face to face pow wow! If Sara and/or Yale
>have problems then let them re-file and we will get it settled once and for
>all in court and I am most positive of the outcome being in my favor!
You're an idiot, Scott. That's not what Sara will do. You'll just have to
wait until you string yourself up before you figure it out.
You had your chance to present your "case", and you ran. Case closed, and
dropped on your head.
-PLH, as I said, life is good
Is that the DA Fatboy accused of corruption awhile back? If it
is,please give me his name and address. I want to send him something
interesting.
>Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message news:<catamont-5E4E75...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net>...
>> In article <puliiv4j15u3lr0o4...@4ax.com>,
>> Sean Cyril O'Tavish <Sean_Cyril_O'Tav...@IRISH-TAVISH-CENTRAL.NET>
>> wrote:
>>
>> And did you tell your DA that you're still posting my address?
:.
>Is that the DA Fatboy accused of corruption awhile back?
NO!
>If it is,please give me his name and address. I want to send him something
>interesting.
My DA has seen your posting of where I live and your saying: "WHO CARES? I HOPE
THEY BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN WITH YOU IN IT" after I stated: "I am very pissed off
and especially so when god damned hypocrites keep posting where I live!!!"
Needless to say I don't think he was impressed with your threats!
Tavish
>On 01 Aug 2003 01:10:05 -0500, <szky8yd...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
How come you keep putting that "L." in there? That's not how I post it.
>>Sean Cyril O'Tavish <Sean_Cyril_O'Tav...@IRISH-TAVISH-CENTRAL.NET> writes:
>>>On 31 Jul 2003 16:00:37 -0500, <szk8yqe...@fnord.io.com> Patrick
>>>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>>>Sean Cyril O'Tavish <Sean_Cyril_O'Tav...@IRISH-TAVISH-CENTRAL.NET> writes:
>>>>>On 31 Jul 2003 19:59:00 GMT,
>>>>><catamont-5E4E75...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>>>>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>>>>>And did you tell your DA that you're still posting my address?
>>>>>I will leave that up to you! :-)
>>>>What a surprise -- Fatbury not willing to own up to his own actions.
>>>>
>>>>-PLH, no wonder he cut and ran last week when we came to town
>>>Say what you want Patrick. I don't really care too much about your trolls
>>>anymore. BTW how could I cut and run when I was already gone before Sara
>>>showed up unannounced? I had personal business I had to handle. Look and
>>>check the dates and you will see I was not online for almost seven days
>>>starting the preceding Sunday before the Tuesday visit your two made to my
>>>fine hamlet. I have nothing to fear from either of you and as I already told
>>>Sara before that preceding weekend-- I only wanted to see her in court and
>>>not in person to here her rants! I can read enough of it online thank you!
>>Bullshit, Scott. You said yourself: "Anytime[sic] and any day. The place:
>>my local courthouse (my jurisdiction)."
>True BUT do you expect me to sit around and wait when I have things I have to
>do? NO! You also keep forgetting (how convenient for you) what that offer
>entailed and it was NOT for meeting that NAG face to face. The conditions were
>stipulated (which you keep deleting):
So? You made the statement and then you ran like a rabbit when you had the
chance to back up your big mouth with concrete action. The conclusion isn't
exactly a challenge to make.
Weren't you the tub of lard who was making no bones about the *fact* that Sara
would be arrested if she showed up in your jurisdiction -- and for perjury, no
less? The DA had a good laugh at THAT illustration of your legal knowledge.
>The above has been posted this many times and I would think by now that you
>two would have gotten the message by now!
You've ranted about this for weeks in a less than subtle attempt to intimidate
-anyone- into doing as you whine, and all you've done is convince an
ever-growing number of complete strangers that you're cracked. That you
haven't figured THAT out by now is illustration of the fact that you're Just
Plain Stupid.
>>Sara made no secret of when she'd be there, and you had the chance of your
>>life to present YOUR "case" to the DA.
>I have no "case" to present to the DA!! I wanted the Assistant DA to give me
>some help concerning Statute of Limitations and how it affects perjury and
>how it would apply to ongoing harassment resulting from a criminal act my
>local attorney thought was beyond the Statute of Limitations. Sara being the
>paranoid personality type and with pangs of guilt and impending doom decided
>to pay my fine town a visit to cover her ass apparently thinking I was trying
>to get my DA to prosecute her which he could not do anyway NOT unless that
>lawsuit was re-filed in my jurisdiction. Her paying a visit to rant and rave
>spoke volumes and especially so when I pointed out that she has done the same
>thing to two other people and you being her travel companion also spoke
>volumes and that is all I need to say about it!
Nice rant, Bradbitch...to which any competent defense would object, as you're
routinely assuming facts for which there are no evidence. Your rant speaks
volumes about what YOUR motivation is.
>ALSO the mere fact Sara posted a picture of a landmark in my town also shows
>she was taking pictures (which is her right) BUT I have no doubt now that my
>picture would have been taken and thus be circulated as well as my address
>had been thus making me an easier target for death threats and some kook
>carrying one put such as has been attempted on yet another person
>(Covington)!
See the above -- if that's what your fraud of a case is based on, you're not
going to accomplish much besides annoying a judge or two, which isn't a wise
course of action.
>The mere fact Sara has "visited" another person's DA who lives in Arkansas and
>attempting to have a face to face with another person who lives in UK speaks
>volumes. Normal people don't do what she does! Care to show any other examples
>of anyone else who will travel thousands of miles to rant and rave?
Normal people aren't attacked by enfants terribles like you for being Jewish,
either -- which is why you were sued in the first place. You obviously
haven't learnt anything from that fiasco, have you? After all, you're back to
the same behavior that prompted the legal action in the first place.
>If Sara wants to meet me then let it be in court! No cameras allowed and let
>her get Yale to re-file his lawsuit or her to file her own lawsuit BUT as for
>listening to her rants and raves in person-- forget it!
Well, since there was no ranting and raving in any of our conversations with
the deputies or the DA, I guess you're more interested in pounding your
convenient strawman rather than own up to your own idiocy.
>>You cut and ran like the quintessential cowardly bully you are, Bubba.
>Who's being the bully? Who is making challenges and wanting to confront
>people? Who keeps making one personal attack post right after another? You
>just don't get it do you!?
Who's the genius that claims that he has a right to act like a chimp because
some religious book says so? (Thanks for continuing to confirm that I will
*never* have to worry about dealing with you whenever I'm in your town, in
addition to your success in uniting complete strangers in an effort to draw
attention to your inability to function in this society.)
>>Obviously, you don't believe in your "case" very much if you can't be
>>bothered to actually show up with it because someone *might* be present
>>who'd laugh in your ugly face. Funny how your "personal business" claim
>>didn't surface until AFTER your yellow belly was pointed out, isn't it?
>My Assistant DA knew of my previous obligation and he knows I am not lying
>and it is only him I worry about having credibility with other than other
>officials in my county who I won't name.
We already know who some of those officials are, as it's a matter of public
record -- but then, we've spoken with them and given them evidence. If you're
not worried about being credible to your own law enforcement community, don't
whine when they repay you the respect you're giving them.
>>>Remember this?
>>[Bradburyectomy]
>You don't want to deal in facts and that is YOUR problem and not mine!
Really? Funny, I'm not the one posting 30-odd 500+-line rants "proving" that
the Nazis were really Jews, or claiming that driving by a gay bar means I've
visited it. That seems to be your province. (That's before we get to your
fetish for crossposting your crap to newsgroups you don't even read, thus
irritating an even wider audience who aren't as gullible as you.)
>>>There is no mention about having a face to face pow wow! If Sara and/or Yale
>>>have problems then let them re-file and we will get it settled once and for
>>>all in court and I am most positive of the outcome being in my favor!
>>You're an idiot, Scott. That's not what Sara will do. You'll just have to
>>wait until you string yourself up before you figure it out.
>>You had your chance to present your "case", and you ran. Case closed, and
>>dropped on your head.
>I had no case to present because my DA has no authority over Sara-- get that
>into your hard head. Now get a life and move on.
Sorry, but I'll make that decision, not you. (Funny how the DA suddenly has
no authority over Sara, isn't it? Two weeks ago, you were foaming at the
mouth at the mere possibility that she'd show up, and you were almost waxing
poetic over how she'd be arrested for perjury. Short memory spans suck, don't
they?)
>>-PLH, as I said, life is good
>Glad you think so but from the way you're always being a sour puss and in the
>personal attack mode one wouldn't think you have too much of a good life!
YOU wouldn't think, Scottie. You've made it painfully clear that thinking is
anathema to you.
>Now I ask-- Just why does Sara like to visit people and why were you fired
>from Rice University? Why is sara so concerned about whether I have a coffee
>cup or not in my name at MY local bakery and her even posting a picture of
>the bakery?
Why don't you ask her? Why I was fired is between me and the University, and
you'll just have to live with that fact. I know you're wanting to take credit
for it, but that's not how it happened in reality.
[about 400 lines of Bradbury's ongoing obsession deleted]
>I have no doubts that pictures of where I live will be posted again too BUT it
>will be your downfall you stalker!
Why? I didn't take pictures this time, any more than I ever have...since your
reasoning abilities are non-existent, that means I've never taken a picture of
*anything* in your town. Your "pals" set you up, on that one.
-PLH, not intimidated at all by loud-mouthed obsessives like Mr. Bradbury
>How come you keep putting that "L." in there? That's not how I post it.
Now I ask-- when I post my munged netcom e-mail address why do you demung it to
open me up to spam?
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
Patrick now back tracking:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szky92tc507.fsf_-_%40fnord.io.com&rnum=2
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:07:43 -0600
Subject: Re: Scott Bradbury proves he's a kook, and implodes; no film at 10
References: <226k8vskrk3lnkto9...@4ax.com>
<szk8yut...@eris.io.com> <ms9k8vobc4a5qp40d...@4ax.com>
<szk1y0l...@eris.io.com> <u2ol8v8e898ui8lb8...@4ax.com>
From: Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
Date: 02 Apr 2003 09:07:20 -0600
Message-ID: <szky92tc5...@fnord.io.com>
>8) For a fact you are a self admitted Peeping Tom:
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
>"---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
>encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just
>look for anyone peeking into windows..." Patrick L. Humphrey
I could have stated that better -- but I was referring to "Shawn" when I said
to look for anyone peeking through windows. I've never engaged in that kind
of activity, because I'm anything but subtle. Lurking in the shadows is what
kooks like you prefer.
<<Tavish comment July 29, 2003: Your own words "if I'm out at night, just
look for anyone peeking into windows" nails you as the peeping tom-- not Shawn!
Piss poor attempt to worm your way out of your own words Peeping Tom Humphrey!>>
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
>On 01 Aug 2003 09:17:45 -0500, <szkptjp...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick L.
>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>How come you keep putting that "L." in there? That's not how I post it.
>Now I ask-- when I post my munged netcom e-mail address why do you demung it
>to open me up to spam?
Were you born stupid or are you studying for it, Scottie? Spammers are a lot
smarter than you'll ever be -- taking out dashes in the e-mail address is a
matter of writing a painfully simple regexp. Besides, why can't you get an
ISP that has enough sense to allow you to filter your mail? Between procmail
and SpamAssassin, I don't have to worry too much about morons like you
invading my mailbox.
Now, why do you keep crossposting your crap to houston.general? No one there
is interested in your mental illness du jour, as even *you* might notice if
you ever bothered to read some of the newsgroups you spam.
-PLH, the rest of Bradbury's obsession with his strawman deleted
> On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> <catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
> "Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> (my jurisdiction).
> The above has been posted this many times and I would think by now that you
> two
> would have gotten the message by now!
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Tavish+%22You+and+Yale+F.+Edeiken+re-file+th
> e+same+exact+perjurious+lawsuit+against+me%22&num=30&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&filter
> =0
> Searched Groups for Tavish "You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact
> perjurious lawsuit against me". Results 1 - 17 of 17
>
> I SEE NOT ONE SINGLE MENTION ABOUT MEETING SARA SALZMAN FACE TO FACE IN MY
> LOCAL
> DA's OFFICE!! DOES ANYONE ELSE?
No one said I did. I was at the COUNTY COURTHOUSE. Right where you said
I should meet you.
>
> >Sara made no secret of when she'd be there, and you had the chance of your
> >life
> >to present YOUR "case" to the DA.
>
> I have no "case" to present to the DA!! I wanted the Assistant DA to give me
> some help concerning Statute of Limitations and how it affects perjury and
> how
> it would apply to ongoing harassment resulting from a criminal act my local
> attorney thought was beyond the Statute of Limitations. Sara being the
> paranoid
> personality type and with pangs of guilt and impending doom decided to pay my
> fine town a visit to cover her ass apparently thinking I was trying to get my
> DA
> to prosecute her which he could not do anyway NOT unless that lawsuit was
> re-filed in my jurisdiction. Her paying a visit to rant and rave spoke
> volumes
> and especially so when I pointed out that she has done the same thing to two
> other people and you being her travel companion also spoke volumes and that
> is
> all I need to say about it!
>
> ALSO the mere fact Sara posted a picture of a landmark in my town also shows
> she
> was taking pictures (which is her right) BUT I have no doubt now that my
> picture
> would have been taken and thus be circulated as well as my address had been
> thus
> making me an easier target for death threats and some kook carrying one put
> such
> as has been attempted on yet another person (Covington)!
Wrong.
>
> The mere fact Sara has "visited" another person's DA who lives in Arkansas
> and
> attempting to have a face to face with another person who lives in UK speaks
> volumes. Normal people don't do what she does! Care to show any other
> examples
> of anyone else who will travel thousands of miles to rant and rave?
Never visited Arkansas, Liar.
>
[hysteria snipped]
>
>
> I have no doubts that pictures of where I live will be posted again too BUT
> it
> will be your downfall you stalker!
>
> Tavish
Nope. No pictures of your shack will be posted. Don Ellis already did
that.
Sara
Unlike Mr. Bradbury posting MY address and his pal Donnie Ellis posting
a photo he thought was MY house. And what kind of car I drive. And what
bumper stickers are on it. And a Mapquest set of directions to my home.
Oh, and let's not forget encouraging Pat Blakely to visit my father.
What a hypocrite!!
Nicely put, Patrick.
Mr. Bradbury said quite clearly that he would meet me "at the County
Courthouse." And there I was, waiting for him to have me arrested for
perjury, as he claimed I would be as soon as I came into his
"jurisdiction."
Oh, one more thing we forgot to mention: The DA and the Sheriff's
officers were certainly not very impressed with Mr. Bradbury's attacks
on my son for being "retarded" when they discussed the fact that my son
is on the Honor Roll with a 4.0 average. Considering that my son has
already finished 4 more years of education than Mr. Bradbury, and with
straight A's, I sure don't think the DA thought very much of Mr.
Bradbury's attacks on my children.
Mr. Bradbury's lies were clearly visible. It's not a question of hearing
"his side" of the issue. He claimed publicly that my son is "retarded,"
and my son spoke at length with the DA. How many other sides are there?
Sara
>What a hypocrite!!
That appears to be Bradbury's main objective in life -- to provide a graphic
illustration of the concept of hypocrisy.
>> >>>Remember this?
>> >>[Bradburyectomy]
>Nicely put, Patrick.
Not surprisingly, there were no deputies waiting to arrest you at the San
Bernard River bridge into his county on I-10. :-)
>Oh, one more thing we forgot to mention: The DA and the Sheriff's
>officers were certainly not very impressed with Mr. Bradbury's attacks
>on my son for being "retarded" when they discussed the fact that my son
>is on the Honor Roll with a 4.0 average. Considering that my son has
>already finished 4 more years of education than Mr. Bradbury, and with
>straight A's, I sure don't think the DA thought very much of Mr.
>Bradbury's attacks on my children.
>Mr. Bradbury's lies were clearly visible. It's not a question of hearing
>"his side" of the issue. He claimed publicly that my son is "retarded,"
>and my son spoke at length with the DA. How many other sides are there?
Bradbury's a human Moebius strip -- there's only one side to him, no matter
the issue. :-) I don't think Mr. Koehn will be inclined to change his
opinion of Bradbury after seeing the evidence with his own eyes.
-PLH, amazed that such a blob as Bradbury can contort himself to that extent
He keeps posting what he claims are threats I made and keeps saying
they've been referred to the cops. When I spoke to the FBI agent a few
years back, he told me law enforcement agencies have the authority to
contact my ISP and get my physical address.How come none of these cops
have come to arrest me or even advise me? They haven't sent me a
letter or called me on the phone, either.
There are two possibilities:
(1)He never sent them anything
(2)They looked at his stuff, decided they were not really threats, and
laughed Fatboy off. Legally, a threat is a statement of intent of the
form "I will do ......".
I did receive a threatening email a few years back and I went to the
FBI with it. I had the guy's real name and address. The FBI took down
my report but did absolutely nothing about it. The agent warned me
they are so busy that many genuine threats never get action.They have
to allocate their limited time and staff to the more serious ones.
>
>
>Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkptjp...@hagbard.io.com>...
[to Bradbitch's latest rant]
>> Weren't you the tub of lard who was making no bones about the *fact* that
>> Sara would be arrested if she showed up in your jurisdiction -- and for
>> perjury, no less? The DA had a good laugh at THAT illustration of your
>> legal knowledge.
>He keeps posting what he claims are threats I made and keeps saying
>they've been referred to the cops. When I spoke to the FBI agent a few
>years back, he told me law enforcement agencies have the authority to
>contact my ISP and get my physical address.How come none of these cops
>have come to arrest me or even advise me? They haven't sent me a
>letter or called me on the phone, either.
>There are two possibilities:
>(1)He never sent them anything
...and that is very likely what happened, given that he's already on record as
lying about what he's allegedly said to his county's DA.
>(2)They looked at his stuff, decided they were not really threats, and
>laughed Fatboy off. Legally, a threat is a statement of intent of the
>form "I will do ......".
Fortunately for the rest of his county, Bradbury's been enough of a pest to
have more than a few records of him in his county law enforcement's archives.
They're limited in what they can do, but they're well aware of his history,
and given Bradbury's stupidity and the laws of probability, it's only a matter
of time before he manages to cross the line and get the law involved.
>I did receive a threatening email a few years back and I went to the
>FBI with it. I had the guy's real name and address. The FBI took down
>my report but did absolutely nothing about it. The agent warned me
>they are so busy that many genuine threats never get action.They have
>to allocate their limited time and staff to the more serious ones.
His county's agencies aren't that occupied (though as part of the Houston
metro area, they're inevitably in the path of the city's expansion), but
they're familiar enough with his tactics to not regard him as credible in any
claims he might make. (The best quote of our visit to his little town came
from one of the law-enforcement people: "We've got an opinion of Bradbury,
but we wouldn't use it in mixed company.")
-PLH, who may start making visits to Austin via Scott's little crossroads
I think this was written by Allan-A-Dale, a minstrel in the time of
Robin of Locksley and Richard the Lionhearted:
Scott the Fat is a curious knave
When cursing Jews,he's known to be brave
He faltereth not in the abuse he hurls
Yet,'Tis proven that he feareth girls.
You've inspired me, Joe, to present some "Classic Reposts" from a few
years ago... some poetry inspired by Mr. Bradbury:
The doctor told Scott to his face:
"Your body fat takes too much space!
And to add to the farce,
Your head's _so_ up your arse
That your asshole is now your neck brace!"
Sara
Hold it, Patrick.Police have jurisdiction. Courts have
jurisdiction.The DA has a jurisdiction. Yellowbellied worms like
Fatboy have no "jurisdiction".
>> Scott the Fat is a curious knave
>> When cursing Jews,he's known to be brave
>> He faltereth not in the abuse he hurls
>> Yet,'Tis proven that he feareth girls.
More lies and personal attacks from Pharisees who can't refute what I post.
>You've inspired me, Joe, to present some "Classic Reposts" from a few
>years ago... some poetry inspired by Mr. Bradbury:
>
>The doctor told Scott to his face:
Not true and you once again tell lies to make p;ersonal attack and yet a kike
like you is clueless why the world in general hates shit like you.
>"Your body fat takes too much space!
> And to add to the farce,
> Your head's _so_ up your arse
>That your asshole is now your neck brace!"
Care to substantiate a doctor has done such to me you fat stupid pig?
Speaking of fat AND ugly:
Sara "Fatress" Salzman: Quintessential FAT in the flesh:
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
If it is true Nazis made soap from Jews I am sure if you were a "detainee" of
theirs in the 40s they could have made a boxcar load of soap and candles from
all of your fat. I just can't imagine anyone, even Nazis, wanting to wash their
hands or clothes with any kind of soap made from JewLard.
Tavish
>Sara
Bradbury's not much of a mensch.
He cannot romance a wench
They all get the chills
And head for the hills
When they get a whiff of his stench.
>Oh, one more thing we forgot to mention: The DA and the Sheriff's
>officers were certainly not very impressed with Mr. Bradbury's attacks
>on my son for being "retarded" when they discussed the fact that my son
>is on the Honor Roll with a 4.0 average.
That may be true BUT the Honor Roll is in his class for the "gifted" which would
be at his level!
Looks like you're caught lying again you filthy piece of pig fat! Do you want to
deny stating the following?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-D20A99.14393008022001%40news.concentric.net&rnum=2
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Psycho Sara and Susie, the 40 yr old Welch MALE plumber
Date: 08 Feb 2001 21:39:42 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-D20A99...@news.concentric.net>
"Both of my children test in the 95% percentile for their ages. Neither
is retarted, severely or not. Both are in the "gifted" programs at their
respective schools..." <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-1003001301510001%40ts011d23.den-co.concentric.net&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Hello Sara
Date: 2000/03/10
Message-ID: <catamont-100...@ts011d23.den-co.concentric.net>
"My SON has a developmental disability, and I may have posted his name back
in the days when Matt Giwer insisted that NO ONE with autism could talk.
He knew that because he had "hugged" an autistic child once." <END>
In article <d96c00cd.02031...@posting.google.com>,
psych...@mindless.com (Sara is a Psycho) wrote:
> QUESTION ABOUT YOUR MORALS:
>
> YOU CLAIM I AM TRAILER TRASH... BUT UNLIKE YOU, I DON'T HAVE A
> MENTALLY RETARDED AUTISTIC KID.
I don't have a mentally-retarded kid either.
<<Tavish comment May 20, 2003: According to the material below you do! So stop
remaining in denial!>>
Autism is a neurological disorder. There is no "cure" for it.
>>On 21 Dec 2001 16:30:02 GMT,
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=catamont-C91B5D...@news.concentric.net&lr=&hl=en
>><catamont-C91B5D...@news.concentric.net> Sara
>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>>Got that? "Autism is not a mental illness."
:.
>>Other sources disagree with you Sara!
>
>Here is what the National Institute of Mental Health says
>
>[snip]
I faithfully restore for the sake of the archives precisely what you deleted and
wish to ignore:
<START>
<<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. - FAIR USE INTENDED>>>
Here is what the National Institute of Mental Health says:
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/publicat/numbers.cfm
Mental Disorders in America
Mental disorders are common in the United States and internationally. An
estimated 22.1 percent of Americans ages 18 and olderóabout 1 in 5 adultsósuffer
from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year.
Many people suffer from more than one mental disorder at a given time.
In the U.S., mental disorders are diagnosed based on the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV).
[...]<Many mental disorders deleted>
Autism affects an estimated 1 to 2 per 1,000 people. Autism and related
disorders (also called autism spectrum disorders or pervasive developmental
disorders) develop in childhood and generally are apparent by age 3.
Autism is about 4 times more common in boys than girls.
What Are the Signs Of Autism?
When an infant or toddler:
-does not cuddle or respond to affection and touching.
-does not make eye contact.
-appears to be unable to communicate.
-displays persistent failure to develop two-way social relationships in any
situation.
-does not show a preference for parents over other adults.
-does not develop friendships with other children.
-has poor language skills; or nonexistent ones.
-shows unusual, extreme responses to objects either avoidance or preoccupation.
-finds moving objects, such as a fan, hold great fascination.
-may form an unusual attachment to odd objects such as a paper or rubberband.
-displays repetitive activities of a restrictive range.
-spins and repeats body movements, such as arm flapping.
-may repeat television commercials.
-may indulge in complex bedtime rituals.
The symptoms of autism range from mild to severe. Although symptoms of the
disorder sometimes can be seen in early infancy, the condition may appear after
months of normal development. About 7 in every 10 children and adolescents with
autism also have mental retardation..
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<<How about that fact Sara? Doc Tavish comment>>
~~End of Cited Material~~
I only quoted what you made public and what the medical specialists say about
autism YET you imply I am deceitful.
Tavish
~~Sara Salzman on record as admitting she's retarded?~~
On 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
"How many times do I have to tell you-- I AM RETARDED!!!"
<catamont-548CA8...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=catamont-548CA8.19314906072003%40spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net&output=gplain
Date: 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT
> On 01 Aug 2003 15:33:23 GMT,
> <catamont-6D8D5A...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >Oh, one more thing we forgot to mention: The DA and the Sheriff's
> >officers were certainly not very impressed with Mr. Bradbury's attacks
> >on my son for being "retarded" when they discussed the fact that my son
> >is on the Honor Roll with a 4.0 average.
>
> That may be true BUT the Honor Roll is in his class for the "gifted" which
> would
> be at his level!
Wrong again, Liar.
>
> Looks like you're caught lying again you filthy piece of pig fat!
Wrong again, Liar.
> Do you want
> to
> deny stating the following?
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-D20A99.14393008022001%40news.
> concentric.net&rnum=2
> From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
> Subject: Re: Psycho Sara and Susie, the 40 yr old Welch MALE plumber
> Date: 08 Feb 2001 21:39:42 GMT
> Message-ID: <catamont-D20A99...@news.concentric.net>
>
> "Both of my children test in the 95% percentile for their ages. Neither
> is retarted, severely or not. Both are in the "gifted" programs at their
> respective schools..." <END>
I sure don't deny posting that. It's absolutely true. Both of my
children are in "GT" programs (Gifted and Talented). In 9th grade, my
son took the PSATs (which are geared for 11th grade) and scored in the
75th percentile. In last year's CSAPs (Colorado Scholastic Aptitude
Prorgam), BOTH children scored in the 95th percentile. My son's tested
IQ is above 145.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-1003001301510001%40ts011d23.d
> en-co.concentric.net&rnum=4
> Subject: Re: Hello Sara
> Date: 2000/03/10
> Message-ID: <catamont-100...@ts011d23.den-co.concentric.net>
>
> "My SON has a developmental disability, and I may have posted his name back
> in the days when Matt Giwer insisted that NO ONE with autism could talk.
> He knew that because he had "hugged" an autistic child once." <END>
>
> In article <d96c00cd.02031...@posting.google.com>,
> psych...@mindless.com (Sara is a Psycho) wrote:
>
> > QUESTION ABOUT YOUR MORALS:
> >
> > YOU CLAIM I AM TRAILER TRASH... BUT UNLIKE YOU, I DON'T HAVE A
> > MENTALLY RETARDED AUTISTIC KID.
>
> I don't have a mentally-retarded kid either.
>
Yep. I don't deny posting that, either. It's absolutely true.
Now go ask your DA if he thought my son was "mentally retarded."
>He keeps posting what he claims are threats I made and keeps saying
>they've been referred to the cops.
Posting where people live and then after I complain about it you then replied
with:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=abf0ff5d.0305151903.1b69d1ca%40posting.google.com&rnum=6
Subject: More Hypocrisy and lies by the Fatboy
Date: 15 May 2003 20:03:31 -0700
Message-ID: <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
(Archived locally as: burn_house)
(I stated):
> I am very pissed off and especially so when god damned hypocrites keep posting
>where I live!!!
(Arthur J. Tandy aka sailor57 replied):
WHO CARES? I HOPE THEY BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN WITH YOU IN IT.
If they do, I'll bring the wienies and marshmallows.Will somebody else
bring the hamburgers and mustard?
<END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=594c8e48.03031...@posting.google.com&lr=&hl=en
From: kni...@indystart.com (Arthur J. Tandy aka Black Knight aka Sailor57)
Subject: Re: Arthur J. Tandy aka Black Knight Wants to Engage in Homosexual Sex
Date: 14 Mar 2003 18:24:06 -0800
Message-ID: <594c8e48.03031...@posting.google.com>
References: <p1m47v0n03p0g0pgd...@4ax.com>
Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message
news:<p1m47v0n03p0g0pgd...@4ax.com>...
> On 4 Mar 2003 21:28:08 -0800, <594c8e48.03030...@posting.google.com>
> kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>
What I really want to engage in is beating your fat belly to a pulp.
Who ever bumps you off should get a medal, scum.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
How about this?
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=aca9dd48.03071...@posting.google.com&lr=&hl=en
From: sailor...@yahoo.com (sailor57)
Subject: Re: Sara Salzman's "Challenge" and My Answer aka Re: CALLING ALL
DOGPATCH RESIDENTS!!
Date: 12 Jul 2003 01:34:42 -0700
Message-ID: <aca9dd48.03071...@posting.google.com>
Wally Cleaver <wally_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote in message
news:<4bsugvskgnutmiu8c...@4ax.com>...
> On 12 Jul 2003 01:17:58 GMT,
> <catamont-06E813...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >> >> Then why don't you post where you live big mouth?
> >> >>
> >> >> Tavish
:.
> >> >Hey, you know where I live, Mr. Bradbury. You post it almost daily. .
> >> ONLY in response to your accomplices posting where I live! Don't forget-- if
> >> it weren't for Yale F. Edeiken subpoenaing my address and him and YOU
> >> distributing it then shit like Patrick Humphrey would not be posting where I
> >> live almost daily!! Shit like you are only getting back in kind what you
> >> started so you can't whine when I reply in kind! I don't post where the people
> >> live who divulged my address UNLESS your thugs post where I live!
> >>
> >> THAT IS FACT!!!
:.
> >> >How about saying it to _my_ face.
> >> >
> >> >Or better yet, I'll come to _your_ town... Xxxxxxx, I believe?
:.
> Why would you want to come to my town?
For the same reason I would-to kick your fucking face in.
> 2) Try to convince my local law enforcement I am harassing you when they know
> what has been done to me.
> 3) Get your accomplices to stop violating my right to privacy and I will then
> stop divulging where the filth live who gave out my address.
Fuck you and fuck your privacy.You are degenerate filth who deserves
nothing but punishment.
<END>
THOSE ARE CRIMINAL THREATS! THOSE ARE YOUR WORDS! I, UNLIKE, EDEIKEN, DON'T HAVE
THE NEED TO FABRICATE ACCUSATIONS!!
>When I spoke to the FBI agent a few years back, he told me law enforcement
>agencies have the authority to contact my ISP and get my physical address.How
>come none of these cops have come to arrest me or even advise me?
Look how long it took for them to visit me after your pals posted forged child
porn ads which gave out my address and telephone number! The first forged child
porn ad was posted in April 10, 2001 and it was May 22, 2001 before I got a
visit! They have other things to do you know!
For a FACT-- you have been reported and for a FACT those threats above were
submitted along with many others your fellow THUGS have made. When I am asked if
I want to press charges what do you think my answer will be?
I will send you a five gallon size bucket of Vaseline to make it easier on you
when some big brute wants to make you his bitch!
>>He keeps posting what he claims are threats I made and keeps saying
>>they've been referred to the cops. When I spoke to the FBI agent a few
>>years back, he told me law enforcement agencies have the authority to
>>contact my ISP and get my physical address.How come none of these cops
>>have come to arrest me or even advise me? They haven't sent me a
>>letter or called me on the phone, either.
It takes time and for a fact you have been reported.
>>There are two possibilities:
>>(1)He never sent them anything
>
>...and that is very likely what happened, given that he's already on record as
>lying about what he's allegedly said to his county's DA.
>
>>(2)They looked at his stuff, decided they were not really threats, and
>>laughed Fatboy off. Legally, a threat is a statement of intent of the
>>form "I will do ......".
>
>Fortunately for the rest of his county, Bradbury's been enough of a pest to
>have more than a few records of him in his county law enforcement's archives.
Care to attempt to substantiate that smear? The only record on me is when I
assisted the DA in busting a con-artists who was ripping people off. I was wired
for sound and acted like a customer and got the goods on the guy who is no
longer around. Other than me providing evidence for the prosecution there is
nothing else other than I am being harassed along with numerous call traces made
because of death threats.
>They're limited in what they can do, but they're well aware of his history,
>and given Bradbury's stupidity and the laws of probability, it's only a matter
>of time before he manages to cross the line and get the law involved.
They have been advised of your firing from Rice University and how their
investigator contacted me for examples of your posts. Shortly after you were
terminated.
>>I did receive a threatening email a few years back and I went to the
>>FBI with it. I had the guy's real name and address. The FBI took down
>>my report but did absolutely nothing about it. The agent warned me
>>they are so busy that many genuine threats never get action.They have
>>to allocate their limited time and staff to the more serious ones.
You just answered you own question moron. You got one threat BUT I have received
many which raises the priority a notch or two.
>His county's agencies aren't that occupied (though as part of the Houston
>metro area, they're inevitably in the path of the city's expansion), but
>they're familiar enough with his tactics to not regard him as credible in any
>claims he might make.
Wishful thinking and a defamation on your part
>The best quote of our visit to his little town came from one of the law-enforcement
>people: "We've got an opinion of Bradbury, but we wouldn't use it in mixed company.")
So you say! Care to name the person? Sara won't!
>-PLH, who may start making visits to Austin via Scott's little crossroads
Tavish
Patrick now back tracking:
<deleted repeat of chickenshit nonsense by the lying sniveling coward
who doesn't know anything>
>
Yeah,yeah,yeah.I'll believe it when I see it.You're a proven habitual
liar, Fatboy.Just repeating your bullshit doesn't make it true.The
fact is that none of my remarks was in the form of a threat.I'm the
one who went to law school, you stupid piece of ignorant bullshit.
I reported a threatening email to the FBI 5 years ago and they have
still done nothing.
Your so-called reports to the cops are bullshit,just as your claims I
threatened you are bullshit, just as most of your posts are bullshit,
just as your claim I didn't post my location is bullshit. You're not a
man at all, just a lying little chickenshit crybaby who can't do
anything but make excuses.
I meant every word of it.
Fuck your privacy-you posted what you thought was my address.
Attention, all posters!!!!!
Fatbury Scumbag the yellow worm lives in Belleville ,Texas!!!!
I SAID BELLEVILLE TEXAS
THAT'S BELLEVILLE TEXAS!!!!!!!
ONE MORE TIME;BELLEVILLE TEXAS
and I will then
> > stop divulging where the filth live who gave out my address.
>
> Fuck you and fuck your privacy.You are degenerate filth who deserves
> nothing but punishment.
>
> <END>
>
> THOSE ARE CRIMINAL THREATS!
Sez you. That shows how ignorant you are.
THOSE ARE YOUR WORDS!
Yes they are and I meant every word of it.
>
> >When I spoke to the FBI agent a few years back, he told me law enforcement
> >agencies have the authority to contact my ISP and get my physical address.How
> >come none of these cops have come to arrest me or even advise me?
>
> Look how long it took for them to visit me after your pals posted forged child
> porn ads which gave out my address and telephone number! The first forged child
> porn ad was posted in April 10, 2001 and it was May 22, 2001 before I got a
> visit! They have other things to do you know!
>
> For a FACT-- you have been reported and for a FACT those threats above were
> submitted along with many others your fellow THUGS have made. When I am asked if
> I want to press charges what do you think my answer will be?
You'll start crying and lie some more.You'll run and hide like you did
when Sara showed up.
>
> I will send you a five gallon size bucket of Vaseline to make it easier on you
> when some big brute wants to make you his bitch!
Naw-bring it in person so I can shove it up your ass.
You already are a bitch....and a habitual filthy liar, and a sniveling
coward and a worthless crybaby.
>
> Tavish
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
Fatboy doesn't understand that some educational and mental abilities
take time to develop.I'm a CPA now who graduated with Honors from U of
Illinois(B+ average with degrees in Economics and Accounting). Do you
know what subject I had the most trouble with in Elementary
school?-Arithmetic.I failed it twice.
The main reasons for the change? First,I had lousy teachers in Grade
school.One of them I had over and over was a mean old witch who used
to scare me and make fun of me.Second, my Father was a CPA who
motivated me to like math.When I was a kid, I hated it.
>In article <o1emiv8gpfdl0gdq0...@4ax.com>,
> Sean Cyril O'Tavish <Sean_Cyril_O'Tav...@IRISH-TAVISH-CENTRAL.NET>
> wrote:
>> On 01 Aug 2003 15:33:23 GMT,
>> <catamont-6D8D5A...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >Oh, one more thing we forgot to mention: The DA and the Sheriff's
>> >officers were certainly not very impressed with Mr. Bradbury's attacks
>> >on my son for being "retarded" when they discussed the fact that my son
>> >is on the Honor Roll with a 4.0 average.
>> That may be true BUT the Honor Roll is in his class for the "gifted" which
>> would be at his level!
>Wrong again, Liar.
Actually, Fatty's just jealous that your son's level is far above anything he
ever achieved.
>> Looks like you're caught lying again you filthy piece of pig fat!
>Wrong again, Liar.
Diagnosing Bradbury is as challenging as the Houston weather forecast for the
five months of summer: 95% of the period, the same forecast will be accurate
-- highs in the upper 90s, lows in the high 70s, east/southeast winds off the
Gulf, 20% chance of afternoon showers and storms.
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-D20A99.14393008022001%40news.
>> concentric.net&rnum=2
>> From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
>> Subject: Re: Psycho Sara and Susie, the 40 yr old Welch MALE plumber
>> Date: 08 Feb 2001 21:39:42 GMT
>> Message-ID: <catamont-D20A99...@news.concentric.net>
>>
>> "Both of my children test in the 95% percentile for their ages. Neither
>> is retarted, severely or not. Both are in the "gifted" programs at their
>> respective schools..." <END>
>I sure don't deny posting that. It's absolutely true. Both of my
>children are in "GT" programs (Gifted and Talented). In 9th grade, my
>son took the PSATs (which are geared for 11th grade) and scored in the
>75th percentile. In last year's CSAPs (Colorado Scholastic Aptitude
>Prorgam), BOTH children scored in the 95th percentile. My son's tested
>IQ is above 145.
That's what's got Bradbury's knickers in a knot, right there. Of course, I
had the benefit of dealing with your son in person -- and if he's retarded,
I'm catatonic.
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-1003001301510001%40ts011d23.d
>> en-co.concentric.net&rnum=4
>> Subject: Re: Hello Sara
>> Date: 2000/03/10
>> Message-ID: <catamont-100...@ts011d23.den-co.concentric.net>
>> "My SON has a developmental disability, and I may have posted his name back
>> in the days when Matt Giwer insisted that NO ONE with autism could talk.
>> He knew that because he had "hugged" an autistic child once." <END>
>> In article <d96c00cd.02031...@posting.google.com>,
>> psych...@mindless.com (Sara is a Psycho) wrote:
>> > QUESTION ABOUT YOUR MORALS:
>> > YOU CLAIM I AM TRAILER TRASH... BUT UNLIKE YOU, I DON'T HAVE A
>> > MENTALLY RETARDED AUTISTIC KID.
>> I don't have a mentally-retarded kid either.
>Yep. I don't deny posting that, either. It's absolutely true.
...and Dale and I are witnesses to that fact, along with a few other people.
>Now go ask your DA if he thought my son was "mentally retarded."
I'm looking forward to seeing what story Bradbury invents this time.
-PLH, place your bets -- how far afield from reality will it be this time?
>On 01 Aug 2003 21:44:49 -0500, <szkadas...@fnord.io.com> Patrick L.
>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>>He keeps posting what he claims are threats I made and keeps saying
>>>they've been referred to the cops. When I spoke to the FBI agent a few
>>>years back, he told me law enforcement agencies have the authority to
>>>contact my ISP and get my physical address.How come none of these cops
>>>have come to arrest me or even advise me? They haven't sent me a
>>>letter or called me on the phone, either.
>It takes time and for a fact you have been reported.
Could you pay attention to who you're responding to? If you're going to
blather in response to *my* article, please confine your whining to what I
stated.
>>>There are two possibilities:
>>>(1)He never sent them anything
>>...and that is very likely what happened, given that he's already on record
>>as lying about what he's allegedly said to his county's DA.
>>>(2)They looked at his stuff, decided they were not really threats, and
>>>laughed Fatboy off. Legally, a threat is a statement of intent of the
>>>form "I will do ......".
>>Fortunately for the rest of his county, Bradbury's been enough of a pest to
>>have more than a few records of him in his county law enforcement's archives.
>Care to attempt to substantiate that smear? The only record on me is when I
>assisted the DA in busting a con-artists who was ripping people off. I was
>wired for sound and acted like a customer and got the goods on the guy who is
>no longer around. Other than me providing evidence for the prosecution there
>is nothing else other than I am being harassed along with numerous call
>traces made because of death threats.
Talk to the Sheriff's Department and the DA, then. Two of the deputies and
the DA both offered much the same opinion of you and your shtick. They're
telling a bit different story than you want to believe.
>>They're limited in what they can do, but they're well aware of his history,
>>and given Bradbury's stupidity and the laws of probability, it's only a
>>matter of time before he manages to cross the line and get the law involved.
>They have been advised of your firing from Rice University and how their
>investigator contacted me for examples of your posts. Shortly after you were
>terminated.
Right, Scottie...and since you've already lied to the DA's office, I'm
supposed to take you at your word?
[...]
>>His county's agencies aren't that occupied (though as part of the Houston
>>metro area, they're inevitably in the path of the city's expansion), but
>>they're familiar enough with his tactics to not regard him as credible in any
>>claims he might make.
>Wishful thinking and a defamation on your part
Take it up with the DA and the Sheriff's Department, then. Sara and her son
and Dale and I are witnesses to their statements about you. We were there.
You ran away.
>>The best quote of our visit to his little town came from one of the
>>law-enforcement people: "We've got an opinion of Bradbury, but we wouldn't
>>use it in mixed company.")
>So you say! Care to name the person? Sara won't!
You'll just have to do your own detetcive work, Scottie. I'm not going to
give you a reason to annoy your law-enforcement people.
-PLH, getting early preparations done for the next MS 150
Actually, what Mr. Bradbury failed to do while trying to dig up dirt on
me, was to read the REST of my exchange with Matt Giwer.
If Mr. Bradbury had bothered to look up the words "High-functioning" or
"Asperger," he would have actually LEARNED something: that a great
number of people on the autism spectrum are not only high-functioning,
they are classified as "genius."
A simple search of "Bill Gates" and "Asperger" on google
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22Bill+Gates%22+Asper
ger
brings up more than 700 hits.
"Albert Einstein" and "Asperger"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22Albert+Einstein
%22++Asperger&btnG=Google+Search
brings up more than 1,100 hits, including:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F05%2F01%2
Fneins01.xml
Great physicists 'had Asperger's'
By David Derbyshire, Science Correspondent
(Filed: 01/05/2003)
The eccentric behaviour of Albert Einstein and Sir Isaac Newton could
have been caused by a mild form of autism, claims a leading specialist
in the disease.
Prof Simon Cohen-Baron, of Cambridge University, believes that the two
greatest physicists of all time showed classic signs of Asperger
syndrome.
Both had problems communicating, had obsessive interests and experienced
difficulties in social relationships - all signs of the condition.
Although Prof Cohen-Baron stresses that it is impossible to make a
proper diagnosis, he believes that the evidence is suggestive.
Einstein started to speak only after his third birthday. He was a slow,
thoughtful talker who would also softly repeat sentences to himself
until he was seven. Although outstanding at maths, his teachers found
him disruptive in the classroom.
Later in life he was a notoriously confusing lecturer. While he had
healthy friendships, he is said to have found small talk difficult.
"What most people with Asperger syndrome find difficult is casual
chatting," Prof Cohen-Baron told New Scientist magazine.
Newton cut an even more eccentric figure than Einstein. According to
contemporary accounts, he barely spoke, became so engrossed in his work
that he often forgot to eat, and was said to be grumpy with his friends.
He had a nervous breakdown at 50, triggered by paranoia and depression.
Asperger syndrome was first identified as a separate condition from
other autism-like disorders in 1944. It is still poorly understood by
doctors and often goes undiagnosed.
People with Asperger syndrome are often of average or above average
intelligence and lead highly productive lives. However, many sufferers
find social situations confusing.
They can be good at picking up details and facts, and may be obsessive
about deeply-held interests, but find it hard to work out what others
are thinking and feeling. Often they do things in inflexible and
repetitive ways and have problems making friends.
AND
http://www.cqc.state.ny.us/newsletter/79asperg.htm
Albert Einstein, Bela Bartok, Alan Turing, Bill Gates and Thomas
Jefferson. Is this a list of Nobel laureates? Geniuses? People who have
changed history?
Or are these people who display the symptoms of Asperger's Syndrome? Dr.
Tony Attwood, the world-renowned Australian psychologist who is an
expert on Asperger's Syndrome, cited them as examples of people with
Asperger's during a Conference held at the Palisades Center in Rockland,
New York, in October of 1999. Dr. Attwood is a practicing clinical
psychologist at MacGregor Specialist Center in Australia, with
twenty-five years of experience in the field of Asperger's Syndrome.
They aren't lies. You just proved them by avoiding Sara.
What you post is incoherent nonsense that nobody takes seriously
anymore because of your reputation as a chronic liar.Refutation is
unnecessary.It is only necessary to refute something if there is a
chance someone will believe it. In your case-, that's no longer a
problem.
However, if you need reminders that your nonsense has been refuted
over and over,here ya go:
>
> >You've inspired me, Joe, to present some "Classic Reposts" from a few
> >years ago... some poetry inspired by Mr. Bradbury:
> >
> >The doctor told Scott to his face:
>
> Not true and you once again tell lies to make p;ersonal attack and yet a kike
> like you is clueless why the world in general hates shit like you.
The only Gentiles I know who hate Jews are you and the other lying
scumbags on this ng.I've got lots of Gentile friends, fatass.
>
>
Fatboy is so full of shit that he'd still have bad breath after using Listerine.
He's very frugal. He saves water by only bathing once a year.
Which DA did Fatboy accuse of corruption months ago?I'd like his
address-I want to send him something.
My research into the poetry of the period 600-800 AD has revealed this
in the English Book of Verses:
Preserve us,O Lord, from the wrath of the Northmen
and from the endless babbling of Scott the Fat
You're using to many big words, Sara.Fatturd will get confused.He
can't read.
Why do you continually try to reason with that overblown flatworm? The
only way to communicate with the SCUMBOY is to yell at him. Just tell
him he is useless lazy parasitic scum and move on to more productive
pastimes.
You still can't read, can you ,Flatworm?He was agreeing with my
speculation.What is it with you, you degenerate parasite?Everything to
you is a ?smear" .He doesn't have to "substantiate" a damn thing, you
fucking idiot. He can say whatever he likes here, just like you do,
you stupid fartbrain.
Have you got the idea, fatbag?Understand, degenerate scum?
The only record on me is when I
> assisted the DA in busting a con-artists who was ripping people off. I was wired
> for sound and acted like a customer and got the goods on the guy who is no
> longer around. Other than me providing evidence for the prosecution there is
> nothing else other than I am being harassed
(Good-you deserve lots of harrassment, you degenerate scum. Hopefully,
someone will distress you so much that you'll do us all a favor and
kill yourself.)
>
> >They're limited in what they can do, but they're well aware of his history,
> >and given Bradbury's stupidity and the laws of probability, it's only a matter
> >of time before he manages to cross the line and get the law involved.
>
<deleted scumbag's bullshit>
>
> >>I did receive a threatening email a few years back and I went to the
> >>FBI with it. I had the guy's real name and address. The FBI took down
> >>my report but did absolutely nothing about it. The agent warned me
> >>they are so busy that many genuine threats never get action.They have
> >>to allocate their limited time and staff to the more serious ones.
>
> You just answered you own question moron. You got one threat BUT I have received
> many which raises the priority a notch or two.
YOu can't read, idiot.Quantity is not the parameter the cops use.You
FUCKING CANNOT READ.
Sez you. Coming from an habitual LIAR, that doesn't mean shit.
>
> >His county's agencies aren't that occupied (though as part of the Houston
> >metro area, they're inevitably in the path of the city's expansion), but
> >they're familiar enough with his tactics to not regard him as credible in any
> >claims he might make.
>
> Wishful thinking and a defamation on your part
SUE HIM ,PARASITE.
>
> >The best quote of our visit to his little town came from one of the law-enforcement
> >people: "We've got an opinion of Bradbury, but we wouldn't use it in mixed company.")
>
> So you say! Care to name the person? Sara won't!
It,s none of your fucking business, you lazy freeloading parasite.
> You still can't read, can you ,Flatworm?He was agreeing with my
> speculation.What is it with you, you degenerate parasite?Everything to
> you is a ?smear" .He doesn't have to "substantiate" a damn thing, you
> fucking idiot. He can say whatever he likes here, just like you do,
> you stupid fartbrain.
> Have you got the idea, fatbag?Understand, degenerate scum?
When someone posts like this they have lost all credibility, and have
lowered themselves to sheer name calling.
I for one am proud to be known by who my enemies are.
..
When ya coming up here, Fatscum?
>
>
>
>
> ..
> Fred <Fr...@Fred.com> wrote in message
> news:<Fred-FAC828.0...@news02.west.earthlink.net>...
> > In article <2a0a014c.03080...@posting.google.com>,
> > rus...@indystart.com (russky) wrote:
> >
> > > You still can't read, can you ,Flatworm?He was agreeing with my
> > > speculation.What is it with you, you degenerate parasite?Everything to
> > > you is a ?smear" .He doesn't have to "substantiate" a damn thing, you
> > > fucking idiot. He can say whatever he likes here, just like you do,
> > > you stupid fartbrain.
> > > Have you got the idea, fatbag?Understand, degenerate scum?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > When someone posts like this they have lost all credibility, and have
> > lowered themselves to sheer name calling.
> >
> > I for one am proud to be known by who my enemies are.
>
> When ya coming up here, Fatscum?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ..
I'd be honored to have this "guy" Russky as my enemy. Russky has a lot
of class, all of it Third.
30
Mr. Bradbury's lack of response noted.
Sara
OOOHH!That was almost as stupid and futile as you are.
It's time to change your diaper,twerp/
Go ahead, impress folks with your brilliance. All its done is convince
me to ignore your complaints about Patrick.
30
Fatboy has neither the reading ability nor the attention span to read
anything that detailed-you used too many big words.
You just proved you can't read.I was not complaining about Patrick at
all.It doesn't matter if you ignore me, since you don't count.
>(Good-you deserve lots of harrassment, you degenerate scum. Hopefully,
>someone will distress you so much that you'll do us all a favor and
>kill yourself.)
You just don't know when to keep your big mouth shut do you Art?
Look at who is harassing who!
The above goes well with these too:
On 2 Aug 2003 18:14:05 -0700, <2a0a014c.0308...@posting.google.com>
rus...@indystart.com (russky) wrote:
>Actually, all I said is I'll be happy if anything nasty
>happens to you. I meant EVERY word of it and I still do.
------
>Sez you.Let's see if the cops interpret my remarks the same way and
>let's see if they do anything about it.
I think continually posting where I live and making such comments as:
I had stated:
> I am very pissed off and especially so when god damned hypocrites keep posting
>where I live!!!
(Arthur J. Tandy aka sailor57 replied):
WHO CARES? I HOPE THEY BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN WITH YOU IN IT.
If they do, I'll bring the wienies and marshmallows.Will somebody else
bring the hamburgers and mustard?
You have also stated:
"Who ever bumps you off should get a medal, scum." AND
I stated:
> Why would you want to come to my town?
You replied:
For the same reason I would-to kick your fucking face in.
<END>
You keep showing yourself for what you are Artie! I got sued for doiing nothing
YET what you are doing is worthy of a lawsuit. Posting where I live and making
the threats you do is actionable!
Tavish
Since you love massive re-posting, how about responding to this:
In article <catamont-0DDF4B...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>,
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> In article <szksmok...@fnord.io.com>,
> Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> > Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> writes:
> >
> > >In article <o1emiv8gpfdl0gdq0...@4ax.com>,
> > > Sean Cyril O'Tavish <Sean_Cyril_O'Tav...@IRISH-TAVISH-CENTRAL.NET>
--
From what I have seen of your posting I can safely assume you are
retarded. I also assume your offspring have stunted mental development
as well. Your brat is autistic and he is mentally retarded. He can't
help it so why do you continually shame him Psycho Sara?
>
Why do you keep spamming this same shit Psycho Sara? Are you off your
meds and your OCD is now kicking in? You are a pathetic piece of
humanity.
[...and couldn't respond to ANY of Sara's observations until the end]
>From what I have seen of your posting I can safely assume you are
>retarded. I also assume your offspring have stunted mental development
>as well. Your brat is autistic and he is mentally retarded. He can't
>help it so why do you continually shame him Psycho Sara?
Not even a credible sockpuppet, "Albert". Too bad your hero didn't have the
balls of a gnat, and show up while we were at the county courthouse informing
the DA a little more...and what he saw is not what you fantasize about.
Sara's son has more brains than all of you cowards hiding behind anonymous
servers combined, but then I actually took the trouble to talk to him in
person. What have you done?
-PLH, besides run like the roaches you are
It IS pretty funny, isn't it?
I'm going to assume that "Albert Conkling" didn't go to college, get a
Masters, or anything of the sort. Yet he can "assume" all he wants about
me. :)
Sara
Take you meds and quiet down. We ae tired of your whining and wailing.
No one needs to assume anything about you. Your mental illness is well
known by many people. You proved how whacked you are when you drove
hundreds of miles to rant to Tavish's DA about matters which weren't his
concern. Why does Tavish's DA care about whether your son is retarded or
not? What did Tavish do which would warrant your pilgrimage to his town
other than for you to try and cover your bobo? You are a crackpot and a
woman with a neurosis. You belong in a padded room.
Poor Donnie, what's the matter? Did Megan lose another race?
>In article <szkd6fj...@hagbard.io.com>,
> Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>> Albert Conkling <acon...@dev.null> writes:
>> [...and couldn't respond to ANY of Sara's observations until the end]
>>
>> >From what I have seen of your posting I can safely assume you are
>> >retarded. I also assume your offspring have stunted mental development
>> >as well. Your brat is autistic and he is mentally retarded. He can't
>> >help it so why do you continually shame him Psycho Sara?
>> Not even a credible sockpuppet, "Albert". Too bad your hero didn't have
>> the balls of a gnat, and show up while we were at the county courthouse
>> informing the DA a little more...and what he saw is not what you fantasize
>> about. Sara's son has more brains than all of you cowards hiding behind
>> anonymous servers combined, but then I actually took the trouble to talk to
>> him in person. What have you done?
>>
>> -PLH, besides run like the roaches you are
>It IS pretty funny, isn't it?
It's amusing to see the latest sockpuppet brigade still haven't been washed in
many a year -- their stench still hangs close about them.
>I'm going to assume that "Albert Conkling" didn't go to college, get a
>Masters, or anything of the sort. Yet he can "assume" all he wants about
>me. :)
Give them all credit for being consistently fact-free in those "assumptions".
;-)
-PLH, anonymous wonders like "Albert" tend to have a bit too much fat in the
brain
I read in another thread you make your obese wife do a dance routine at your local topless
bar. How much does she get paid for a session of shaking her sagging boobies?
You have a fat wife and that is why you chase after men all the time. Her big butt
is a turn off for a gay boy like you.
And your wife is simply fat; real fat.
Sara is a mental case and anyone who has heard or read her hysterical
rants knows so.
>
>Poor Donnie, what's the matter? Did Megan lose another race?
>
Who is Donnie? Is your son still pooping in his pants and taking out the turds
and playing with them?
>Sara
>
Will you shut up. We are tired of your outpours of your pathetic wails.
You damned Jews don't ever know when to shut up. Your son is a reatrd; live
with it.
Why are you so obsessed with feces? Did you have a problem with toilet
training?
>In article <catamont-0DD407...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>, Sara
>Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
[...]
>>Mr. Bradbury's lack of response noted.
>Will you shut up. We are tired of your outpours of your pathetic wails.
>You damned Jews don't ever know when to shut up. Your son is a reatrd; live
>with it.
YOU live with it, brain-damaged sockpuppet, since you'd never believe the
evidence from your own wrecked eyes. As someone who's been in the presence of
Sara and her son, if he's retarded, I'm catatonic. (He's smarter than you by
a long shot, definitely, but then I've only observed his intelligence in
person. You're the nutless eunuch who hides behind an anonymous remailer.)
-PLH, <Kyle>Kick the Ellis!</Kyle>
> On 01 Aug 2003 15:33:23 GMT,
> <catamont-6D8D5A...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>Oh, one more thing we forgot to mention: The DA and the Sheriff's
>>officers were certainly not very impressed with Mr. Bradbury's attacks
>>on my son for being "retarded" when they discussed the fact that my son
>>is on the Honor Roll with a 4.0 average.
>
> That may be true BUT the Honor Roll is in his class for the "gifted" which would
> be at his level!
"Gifted" means they are extra smart, Scott. Better research the matter.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
> In article <o1emiv8gpfdl0gdq0...@4ax.com>,
> Sean Cyril O'Tavish <Sean_Cyril_O'Tav...@IRISH-TAVISH-CENTRAL.NET>
> wrote:
>
>>On 01 Aug 2003 15:33:23 GMT,
>><catamont-6D8D5A...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Oh, one more thing we forgot to mention: The DA and the Sheriff's
>>>officers were certainly not very impressed with Mr. Bradbury's attacks
>>>on my son for being "retarded" when they discussed the fact that my son
>>>is on the Honor Roll with a 4.0 average.
>>
>>That may be true BUT the Honor Roll is in his class for the "gifted" which
>>would
>>be at his level!
>
> Wrong again, Liar.
>
>>Looks like you're caught lying again you filthy piece of pig fat!
>
> Wrong again, Liar.
>
>>Do you want
>>to
>>deny stating the following?
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-D20A99.14393008022001%40news.
>>concentric.net&rnum=2
>>From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
>>Subject: Re: Psycho Sara and Susie, the 40 yr old Welch MALE plumber
>>Date: 08 Feb 2001 21:39:42 GMT
>>Message-ID: <catamont-D20A99...@news.concentric.net>
>>
>>"Both of my children test in the 95% percentile for their ages. Neither
>>is retarted, severely or not. Both are in the "gifted" programs at their
>>respective schools..." <END>
>
> I sure don't deny posting that. It's absolutely true. Both of my
> children are in "GT" programs (Gifted and Talented).
Something Scott was surely not in.
> In 9th grade, my
> son took the PSATs (which are geared for 11th grade) and scored in the
> 75th percentile. In last year's CSAPs (Colorado Scholastic Aptitude
> Prorgam), BOTH children scored in the 95th percentile. My son's tested
> IQ is above 145.
Which is several orders of magnitude above Scott's. Hence, his jealousy.
> Why are you so obsessed with feces? Did you have a problem with toilet
> training?
What toilet training?
One sure sign that Bradbury is getting his clock cleaned is when he
drags in the scumboys to bail him out.
[drivel deleted]