Gerry Armstrong's Outstanding Web Site
Steve Fishman
did not see his web site listed currently as a reference, so I am re-posting
the link to it for all to visit if they wish.
In my opinion, it is an excellent site. Go see it for yourself.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/introduction.html
With Best Wishes,
Steve Fishman
xe...@ix.netcom.com
roger gonnet
"Steve Fishman" <xe...@ix.netcom.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
DzUL9.210375$pN3.17573@sccrnsc03...
He Steve,
Sure, Gerry and Caroline are great, and the site is remarkable.
roger
>
Magoo
Tha
"Steve Fishman" <xe...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:DzUL9.210375$pN3.17573@sccrnsc03...
Magoo
Thanks for posting these sites. What I've read so far is actually
excellent.
I hadn't seen them, and I'm happy you posted the links to them.
Happy Holidays to you :)
Tory/Magoo!
"Steve Fishman" <xe...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:DzUL9.210375$pN3.17573@sccrnsc03...
Diane Richardson
wrote:
>Steve...
>
>Thanks for posting these sites. What I've read so far is actually
>excellent.
>
>I hadn't seen them, and I'm happy you posted the links to them.
Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
with the $800,000.
That's a real winner. With a God (R] like that, no wonder His
Prophet (R) is such a fruitcake.
Excellent!
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Warrior
Thanks for posting about it. I think it's an excellent site too.
My favorite parts are the documents. There are many, and there
are many more to come!
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to you!
Warrior - Sunshine disinfects
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
http://warrior.xenu.ca
Warrior
>
>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
>with the $800,000.
Not long ago you claimed that Gerry hid the money.
What is your evidence for this allegation?
You also said, "rather than being honest and handing the money back
to the Church of Scientology, [Gerry] hid it."
What is your evidence for this allegation?
I notice you have trouble keeping your story straight, Diane. That's
the trouble with liars like you.
Warrior - Sunshine disinfects
http://warrior.xenu.ca
roger gonnet
"Diane Richardson" <ref...@bway.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
3e0033e0...@news.bway.net...
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:06:10 GMT, "Magoo" <mag...@worldnet.att.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Steve...
> >
> >Thanks for posting these sites. What I've read so far is actually
> >excellent.
> >
> >I hadn't seen them, and I'm happy you posted the links to them.
>
> Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
> told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
> $800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
> contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
> with the $800,000.
Diane has spoken. Don't miss that the stoopid diane knows better than
evertyone here: she's THE great Goddess herself. Without the attributes,
I mean.
r
Tigger
(Steve Fishman) wrote:
>There has been a lot of discussion about
> Gerry Armstrong on this board but I did
> not see his web site listed currently as a
> reference, so I am re-posting the link to
> it for all to visit if they wish.
>In my opinion, it is an excellent site. Go
> see it for yourself.
>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/
>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/i
>ntroduction.html
Mr. Fishman,
Perhaps you did not see or you did not understand what the Armstrong
"comedy of errors" was about with relationship to certain things Gerry
Armstrong puts on his website, including and specifically. his goOn
SquAd Follies, calling critics whose only crime was to disagree with him
about putting up such a page (to begin with in regard to Garry Scarff)
OSA.
No one said most of the stuff on Armstrong's website is not good.....but
you would agree, would you not, that making false accusations and
presenting false information, i.e. telling lies, does not belong on an
"excellent" website and makes any website less "excellent" (credible)?
Best Wishes to you too.
Tigger
>With Best Wishes,
>Steve Fishman
>xe...@ix.netcom.com
**************************************************************
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the
people... Be not intimidated, therefore, by any terrors, from publishing
with the utmost freedom...nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of
your liberty by any pretenses of politeness, delicacy, or decency.
These, as they are often used, are but three different names for
hypocrisy, chicanery, and cowardice." -- John Adams
**************************************************************
Diane Richardson
>In article <3e0033e0...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net says...
>>
>>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
>>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
>>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
>>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
>>with the $800,000.
>
>Not long ago you claimed that Gerry hid the money.
>
>What is your evidence for this allegation?
Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
for there.
>You also said, "rather than being honest and handing the money back
>to the Church of Scientology, [Gerry] hid it."
>
>What is your evidence for this allegation?
Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
for there.
>I notice you have trouble keeping your story straight, Diane. That's
>the trouble with liars like you.
You are the liar, Warrior. It must be very hard for you to face the
truth. Here's a reminder:
>Where have I ever stated that individuals' personal opinions constitute
>"black propaganda"?
In message <asj9o...@drn.newsguy.com> Warrior wrote:
___________________________________________
It's not simply a matter of their webbing of posts because of
disagreement. I think (and Gerry and/or Caroline can correct me if I
am wrong) that the webbed posts demonstrate quite clearly the black
propaganda being waged against them.
___________________________________________
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Diane Richardson
>Hi Steve,
>
>Thanks for posting about it. I think it's an excellent site too.
>My favorite parts are the documents.
My favorite document is the Prophet of God's [R] most recent. You
can find it here:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/armstrong-answer-cv021632.html
__________________________________
Here's just a bit of that Armstrong "wit and humor." Here's where
Armstrong blames his behavior on God [R]:
"...because Armstrong was guided by God to sign CSI's, Scientology's,
Miscavige's and the beneficiaries' illegal, unconstitutional, greatly
stupid, impossible to perform, anti-public policy, anti-American,
anti-religion, diabolical and insane mutual release...."
Since every judge Gerry's been before has upheld the legality of the
agreement he signed with the CoS, it must have been his God [R] who
told Gerry this:
"Since the terms of paragraph 7D of the mutual release are
illegal, unconstitutional, greatly stupid, impossible to perform,
anti-public policy, anti-American, anti-religion, diabolical and
insane, Armstrong had no obligation to perform such terms."
Armstrong's God [R] sure does hand out crappy legal advice!
Here Armstrong admits he's violating the injunction, although he
prefers to blame his God [R] for the violations:
"Armstrong admits that he violates the injunction, which is illegal,
unconstitutional, greatly stupid, impossible to perform,
anti-public policy, anti-American, anti-religion, diabolical, insane
and clearly unenforceable, at the Will of God."
Too bad invoking the Will of God [R] isn't a legal defense in
this country. Maybe Gerry should try it out in a country ruled
by the Sharia. He might have better luck there.
I haven't seen anything "Divine" about Armstrong's flagrant
violations of the injunction against him. I guess that's because
I don't follow the same God [R] that Gerry listens to:
"...it is a Divine Impossibility because the people that CSI,
Scientology, Miscavige and the beneficiaries seek with their
complaint to prevent Armstrong from advising or assisting, and which
this Court would punish him for advising or assisting, are each and
every one the more than six billion wogs in the world, every child of
God in the universe."
Armstrong sure does toss his God's [R] name around a lot in this
document.
"Armstrong is a wog who has been given a role by God...."
"Wogs are God's children, and God has always raised up and will always
raise up wogs, as He has raised up Armstrong...."
"Armstrong is a Christian, possessing an inalienable right from God
Himself..."
"...Armstrong is a Prophet to Scientologists, hereinafter "PtS"®, and
as a PtS possesses an inalienable right from God Himself ...to bring
the Word of God, by speech and writing in any medium, to
Scientologists...."
>There are many, and there
>are many more to come!
Yep, and God's [R] Prophet to Scientologists [R] keeps cranking out
bullcrap like that by the ream. I don't think the court finds
Armstrong nearly as amusing as Armstrong finds himself.
It's sort of similar to Steve Fishman's Lonesome Squirrel. Just
replace Armstrong's God [R] with references to human excrement
and they're nearly identical.
Except, of course, that Fishman is a much better writer.
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Diane Richardson
(Tigger) wrote:
>Date: Wed, Dec 18, 2002, 6:27am (CST+6) From: xe...@ix.netcom.com
>(Steve=A0Fishman) wrote:
>
>>There has been a lot of discussion about
>> Gerry Armstrong on this board but I did
>> not see his web site listed currently as a
>> reference, so I am re-posting the link to
>> it for all to visit if they wish.
>
>>In my opinion, it is an excellent site. Go
>> see it for yourself.
>
>
>>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/
>
>>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/i
>>ntroduction.html
>
>Mr. Fishman,
>
>Perhaps you did not see or you did not understand what the Armstrong
>"comedy of errors" was about with relationship to certain things Gerry
>Armstrong puts on his website, including and specifically. his goOn
>SquAd Follies, calling critics whose only crime was to disagree with him
>about putting up such a page (to begin with in regard to Garry Scarff)
>OSA.
Fishman has Armstrong beat by a mile, Tigger. He was calling critics
who questioned him "OSA operatives" back when Gerry was still
trying to find the power switch on his pc.
>No one said most of the stuff on Armstrong's website is not good.....
Good for a laugh, I guess. It's mostly just Armstrong wasting the
court's time and taxpayer's dollars by playing the Divine Fool. Too
bad he does such a poor job at it.
Maybe Armstrong might benefit from taking a page from Fishman's
book -- he could claim he's not just the Prophet of God [R] but the
Father of Christ [R]. Fishman has done that and more, but with
much more style and grace than Armstrong will ever muster.
>but
>you would agree, would you not, that making false accusations and
>presenting false information, i.e. telling lies, does not belong on an
>"excellent" website and makes any website less "excellent" (credible)?
Remembering Fishman's posts to this newsgroup, I'd imagine he's
specifically praising Armstrong's "goOn SquA follies" page. Except
if Fishman were to do it, there'd be scatalogical nicknames attached.
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Tilman Hausherr
wrote in <3e0033e0...@news.bway.net>:
>On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:06:10 GMT, "Magoo" <mag...@worldnet.att.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Steve...
>>
>>Thanks for posting these sites. What I've read so far is actually
>>excellent.
>>
>>I hadn't seen them, and I'm happy you posted the links to them.
>
>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
>with the $800,000.
So what? The money has "In God we trust" printed on it. So stop
ridiculing his religious beliefs.
Tilman
--
Tilman Hausherr [KoX, SP5.55] Entheta * Enturbulation * Entertainment
til...@berlin.snafu.de http://www.xenu.de
Resistance is futile. You will be enturbulated. Xenu always prevails.
Find broken links on your web site: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html
The Xenu bookstore: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/bookstore.html
zobicus
ref...@bway.net (Diane Richardson) wrote in message news:<3e007ecf...@news.bway.net>...
Diane Richardson
<til...@berlin.snafu.de> wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:46:03 GMT, ref...@bway.net (Diane Richardson)
>wrote in <3e0033e0...@news.bway.net>:
>
>>On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:06:10 GMT, "Magoo" <mag...@worldnet.att.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Steve...
>>>
>>>Thanks for posting these sites. What I've read so far is actually
>>>excellent.
>>>
>>>I hadn't seen them, and I'm happy you posted the links to them.
>>
>>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
>>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
>>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
>>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
>>with the $800,000.
>
>So what? The money has "In God we trust" printed on it.
Now there's a non-sequitur if I've ever seen one!
>So stop ridiculing his religious beliefs.
Beverly Rice, who perhaps knows Gerry Armstrong better than
anyone else on the newsgroup, wrote about him:
_________________________________________
From: Beverly Rice <dbj...@mpinet.net>
Subject: Re: THE REAL GERRY ARMSTRONG (repost)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:14:00 -0500
Message-ID: <3DD9BA...@mpinet.net>
you are ~NOT~ a "Man of God" . . .
you're not even a man . . .
you've always had to depend on finding a strong woman to be your
"left nut" for you.
You are a fraud, and you are every bit as much a con man as
Hubbard was . . .
just with a much smaller following . . .
Yeh, I know, you are working on that.
___________________________________________
In the same post, Bev also calls Gerry Armstrong a liar, scum, a
con man and a fraud, and writes: "I know what you pretend to be now,
but I also know that you are still Intel in your heart."
I agree with Bev.
Armstrong thinks he's being so very, very clever. I admit he's
fooled and manipulated some people, most noticeably Warrior.
But that's not surprising, since Warrior was fooled by Hubbard
for years. Others here do a better job of detecting BS when they
smell it.
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Dave Bird
<ref...@bway.net> writes:
>On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:31:37 +0100, Tilman Hausherr
><til...@berlin.snafu.de> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:46:03 GMT, ref...@bway.net (Diane Richardson)
>>wrote in <3e0033e0...@news.bway.net>:
>>
>>>On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:06:10 GMT, "Magoo" <mag...@worldnet.att.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Steve...
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for posting these sites. What I've read so far is actually
>>>>excellent.
>>>>
>>>>I hadn't seen them, and I'm happy you posted the links to them.
>>>
>>>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
>>>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
>>>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
>>>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
>>>with the $800,000.
>>
>>So what? The money has "In God we trust" printed on it.
>
>Now there's a non-sequitur if I've ever seen one!
>
>>So stop ridiculing his religious beliefs.
I think it is a case of Pot-Kettle-Black: here we have a
nation of burbling barmpots who announce on their currency
notes that they phone up Santa Claus for political advice.
Why single out Armstrong as more barmy in his belief
than the majority?
>
>Beverly Rice, who perhaps knows Gerry Armstrong better than
>anyone else on the newsgroup, wrote about him:
>_________________________________________
>
>From: Beverly Rice <dbj...@mpinet.net>
>Subject: Re: THE REAL GERRY ARMSTRONG (repost)
>Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:14:00 -0500
>Message-ID: <3DD9BA...@mpinet.net>
>
>you are ~NOT~ a "Man of God" . . .
>
>you're not even a man . . .
>
>you've always had to depend on finding a strong woman to be your
>"left nut" for you.
>
>You are a fraud, and you are every bit as much a con man as
>Hubbard was . . .
>
>just with a much smaller following . . .
>
>Yeh, I know, you are working on that.
>___________________________________________
>
>In the same post, Bev also calls Gerry Armstrong a liar, scum, a
>con man and a fraud, and writes: "I know what you pretend to be now,
>but I also know that you are still Intel in your heart."
Why? what was the substance if the dispute that led to this??
>
>I agree with Bev.
You would, wouldn't you. You think the Easter Bunny is a
drug baron.
>
>Diane Richardson
>ref...@bway.net
>
--
FUCK THE SKULL OF HUBBARD, AND BUGGER THE DWARF HE RODE IN ON!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
8====3 (O 0) GROETEN --- PRINTZ XEMU EXTRAWL no real OT has
|n| (COMMANDER, FIFTH INVADER FORCE) ever existed
.................................................................
A society without a religion is like a maniac without a chainsaw.
Boudewijn van Ingen
wrote:
Good to see you're still here, Steve!
--
Groeten,
Boudewijn.
Warrior
>>(ref...@bway.net) in posting contradictory statements wrote:
>>>
>>>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
>>>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
>>>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
>>>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
>>>with the $800,000.
Here you claim he gave away all his material possessions purchased
with the $800,000. Earlier you claimed he hid the money. These
two statements are not consistent.
>On 18 Dec 2002 01:35:08 -0800, Warrior <war...@xenu.ca> wrote:
>>
>>Not long ago you claimed that Gerry hid the money.
>>
>>What is your evidence for this allegation?
In article <3e00788...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net says...
>
>Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
>for there.
>Warrior asked:
>>
>>You also said, "rather than being honest and handing the money back
>>to the Church of Scientology, [Gerry] hid it."
>>
>>What is your evidence for this allegation?
In article <3e00788...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net says...
>
>Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
>for there.
After reading his web site (again) I have found no evidence to support
your claim that Gerry hid the money. You made an allegation. You need
to post your evidence.
<snip rest of Diane's twisted logic>
Warrior
>>>
>>>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
>>>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
>>>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
>>>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
>>>with the $800,000.
>On 18 Dec 2002 01:35:08 -0800, Warrior <war...@xenu.ca> wrote:
>>
>>Not long ago you claimed that Gerry hid the money.
>>
>>What is your evidence for this allegation?
In article <3e00788...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net says...
>
>Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
>for there.
You made the allegation. State your evidence.
>>You also said, "rather than being honest and handing the money back
>>to the Church of Scientology, [Gerry] hid it."
>>
>>What is your evidence for this allegation?
>Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
>for there.
You made the allegation. State your evidence.
I've read every single page on Gerry's site at http://gerryarmstrong.org
and did not see anything to support your allegations.
I think you lied about Gerry again.
Garry
> >
> >Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
> >told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
> >$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
> >contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
> >with the $800,000.
>
> Not long ago you claimed that Gerry hid the money.
>
> What is your evidence for this allegation?
>
> You also said, "rather than being honest and handing the money back
> to the Church of Scientology, [Gerry] hid it."
>
> What is your evidence for this allegation?
>
> I notice you have trouble keeping your story straight, Diane. That's
> the trouble with liars like you.
I notice you have trouble Mark remaining objective, Mark. That's the
trouble with pathetic apologists and Gerry-Jihad-suck-ups like you.
Garry
> >
> >Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
> >told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
> >$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
> >contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
> >with the $800,000.
>
> So what? The money has "In God we trust" printed on it. So stop
> ridiculing his religious beliefs.
Religious beliefs?? ROTFLOL!!! Trying to be a comedian now, Tilly?
Steve Fishman
"Diane Richardson" <ref...@bway.net> wrote in message
news:3e0087b9...@news.bway.net...
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:24:00 -0600 (CST), booboo...@webtv.net
> Fishman has Armstrong beat by a mile, Tigger. He was calling critics
> who questioned him "OSA operatives" back when Gerry was still
> trying to find the power switch on his pc.
> Diane Richardson
> ref...@bway.net
Diane,
Critics? The only ONE alleged "critic" I ever called an OSA Operative was
YOU, Diane.
And I still believe you are THE mole on the face of darkness.
With Kindest Regards,
Steve Fishman
Garry
> >>>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
> >>>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
> >>>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
> >>>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
> >>>with the $800,000.
>
> Here you claim he gave away all his material possessions purchased
> with the $800,000. Earlier you claimed he hid the money. These
> two statements are not consistent.
> >>
> >>You also said, "rather than being honest and handing the money back
> >>to the Church of Scientology, [Gerry] hid it."
> >>
> >>What is your evidence for this allegation?
>
> In article <3e00788...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net says...
> >
> >Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
> >for there.
>
> After reading his web site (again) I have found no evidence to support
> your claim that Gerry hid the money. You made an allegation. You need
> to post your evidence.
Why? Because you - Gerry Jihad's Faithful Rectal Kisser - says so??
Your prophet, Gerry Jihad has made numerous allegations about many
people and hasn't provided a shred of evidence about any of them.
Get your head out of Gerry's ass before it's too late, Marky.
Steve Fishman
"Boudewijn van Ingen" <bo...@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:e1620v08qr17461tk...@4ax.com...
> Good to see you're still here, Steve!
> Groeten,
> Boudewijn.
Dear Boudewijn,
How could I ever leave such a fascinating place? ARS is my favorite bedtime
reading.
Thanks, it is nice to be missed.
Steve
Warrior
>
>Armstrong thinks he's being so very, very clever. I admit he's
>fooled and manipulated some people, most noticeably Warrior.
Poor Diane. Wrong again.
roger gonnet
> On 18 Dec 2002 01:35:08 -0800, Warrior <war...@xenu.ca> wrote:
>
> >In article <3e0033e0...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net
says...
> >>
>
> truth.
I never read a lie from warrior, but since years, you've become crazy,
Diane.
Go take a professional help - not from clams, they are making you worse
than better.
r
roger gonnet
> On 18 Dec 2002 00:22:11 -0800, Warrior <war...@xenu.ca> wrote:
>
> >Hi Steve,
> >
> >Thanks for posting about it. I think it's an excellent site too.
> >My favorite parts are the documents.
>
> My favorite document is the Prophet of God's [R] most recent. You
> can find it here:
>
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/armstrong-answer-cv021632
.html
> __________________________________
>
> Here's just a bit of that Armstrong "wit and humor." Here's where
> Armstrong blames his behavior on God [R]:
seems that you're unable to seize its humour, yes. And its defs, yes.
r
Warrior
>>>
>>>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
>>>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
>>>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
>>>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
>>>with the $800,000.
>Warrior wrote:
>>
>> Here you claim he gave away all his material possessions purchased
>> with the $800,000. Earlier you claimed he hid the money. These
>> two statements are not consistent.
Diane said, "rather than being honest and handing the money back
to the Church of Scientology, [Gerry] hid it."
I asked, "What is [her] evidence for this allegation?"
In article <3e00788...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net responded,
in her usual evasive and non-responsive manner:
>
>Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
>for there.
>Warrior <war...@xenu.ca> wrote in message news:<atrbk...@drn.newsguy.com>..
>>
>> After reading his web site (again) I have found no evidence to support
>> your claim that Gerry hid the money. You made an allegation. You need
>> to post your evidence.
In article <f6058cf6.02121...@posting.google.com>, ffr...@hotmail.com
says...
>
>Why? Because you - Gerry Jihad's Faithful Rectal Kisser - says so??
No, Garry. Anyone can make an allegation. If there is truth to it, one
should be able to post the specific evidence that supports the allegation.
Warrior
I notice you have trouble Garry refraining from pottymouth, Garry. :)
>That's the trouble with pathetic apologists and Gerry-Jihad-suck-ups
>like you.
Get help, Garry.
Diane Richardson
>>>In article <3e0033e0...@news.bway.net>, Diane Richardson
>>>(ref...@bway.net) in posting contradictory statements wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
>>>>told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
>>>>$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
>>>>contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
>>>>with the $800,000.
>
>Here you claim he gave away all his material possessions purchased
>with the $800,000. Earlier you claimed he hid the money. These
>two statements are not consistent.
Yes they are. Armstrong hid his money by giving it away.
>>On 18 Dec 2002 01:35:08 -0800, Warrior <war...@xenu.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>Not long ago you claimed that Gerry hid the money.
>>>
>>>What is your evidence for this allegation?
>
>In article <3e00788...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net says...
>>
>>Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
>>for there.
>
>>Warrior asked:
>>>
>>>You also said, "rather than being honest and handing the money back
>>>to the Church of Scientology, [Gerry] hid it."
>>>
>>>What is your evidence for this allegation?
>
>In article <3e00788...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net says...
>>
>>Read Armstrong's website. You'll find the evidence you're looking
>>for there.
>
>After reading his web site (again) I have found no evidence to support
>your claim that Gerry hid the money. You made an allegation. You need
>to post your evidence.
>
><snip rest of Diane's twisted logic>
There's nothing "twisted" about my logic, Warrior.
Gerry Armstrong tried a variety of maneuvers (including establishing a
bogus corporation) in an effort to protect the proceeds he received
in his settlement with the Church of Scientology.
When that didn't work, he transferred the proceeds to others. That's
when he began his "witty" ruse that he was a Prophet of God [R].
It's all there on his website, Warrior. That website you claim you've
read thoroughly.
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Diane Richardson
The evidence is available in the court documents on Armstrong's
website. You claim you've read the website, so you have seen the
evidence.
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Diane Richardson
<gon...@antisectes.net> wrote:
>
>"Diane Richardson" <ref...@bway.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
>3e00788...@news.bway.net...
>> On 18 Dec 2002 01:35:08 -0800, Warrior <war...@xenu.ca> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <3e0033e0...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net
>says...
>> >>
>>
>> You are the liar, Warrior. It must be very hard for you to face the
>> truth.
>
>I never read a lie from warrior, but since years, you've become crazy,
>Diane.
I always read a lie from warrior, but since years, you've become
crazy, Roger.
>Go take a professional help - not from clams, they are making you worse
>than better.
Go take a professional help, Roger. Not for clams, you've already
done that. They are making you worse than better.
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Diane Richardson
>In article <3e00e4ef...@news.bway.net>, ref...@bway.net says...
>>
>>Armstrong thinks he's being so very, very clever. I admit he's
>>fooled and manipulated some people, most noticeably Warrior.
>
>Poor Diane. Wrong again.
Poor Warrior. Wrong again.
>See http://gerryarmstrong.org
I have, which is why I made the above statement.
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Diane Richardson
wrote:
>
The resurrection of the Lonesome Squirrel! Still saving your semen in
a used pickle jar, Steve?
With Kindest Regards,
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Charlie
Perhaps when her current assignment is complete she can get trained to
become a Product Officer for the SO. That way she could spend entire
days looking for and complaining about the tiniest faults in others,
yet never having to look at her own. This is a job she should truly
excel at.
Diane Richardson
>"Steve Fishman" <xe...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<M0fM9.273027$GR5....@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>...
>> "Diane Richardson" <ref...@bway.net> wrote in message
>> news:3e0087b9...@news.bway.net...
>> > On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:24:00 -0600 (CST), booboo...@webtv.net
>>
>> > Fishman has Armstrong beat by a mile, Tigger. He was calling critics
>> > who questioned him "OSA operatives" back when Gerry was still
>> > trying to find the power switch on his pc.
>>
>> > Diane Richardson
>> > ref...@bway.net
>>
>> Diane,
>>
>> Critics? The only ONE alleged "critic" I ever called an OSA Operative was
>> YOU, Diane.
>>
>> And I still believe you are THE mole on the face of darkness.
>
>Perhaps when her current assignment is complete she can get trained to
>become a Product Officer for the SO.
Is that your current position in the Church of Scientology? I thought
you were in Intel.
>That way she could spend entire
>days looking for and complaining about the tiniest faults in others,
>yet never having to look at her own. This is a job she should truly
>excel at.
I guess it makes sense that your Church would reassign you after
you so thoroughly flubbed your last assignment. Stacy must be
so grateful to Rinder for assigning you to be her own personal
PR. Too bad you did such a poor job at it.
Good luck on your new assignment!
Diane Richardson
ref...@bway.net
Garry
> In article <f6058cf6.02121...@posting.google.com>,
> Garry Scarff <ffr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >I notice you have trouble Mark remaining objective, Mark.
>
> I notice you have trouble Garry refraining from pottymouth, Garry. :)
I ntoice you have trouble Mark refraining from sucking Gerryass, Mark. :-)
>
> >That's the trouble with pathetic apologists and Gerry-Jihad-suck-ups
> >like you.
>
> Get help, Garry.
And who would you suggest? The prophet whose ass you worship - Gerry Jihad?<snicker>
Garry
Go figure. You worship the toilet paper that Gerry wipes his ass on.
>
> I think you lied about Gerry again.
Pot kettle black.
Martin Ottmann
Hi Steven,
> How could I ever leave such a fascinating place? ARS is my favorite bedtime
> reading.
> Thanks, it is nice to be missed.
How are you doing? How is Dr. Geertz doing?
Greetings,
Martin
Steve Fishman
"Diane Richardson" <ref...@bway.net> wrote
> The resurrection of the Lonesome Squirrel! Still saving your semen in
> a used pickle jar, Steve?
> With Kindest Regards,
> Diane Richardson
> ref...@bway.net
Dear Diane,
Of all the things in the world you could want for the holidays, I am quite
surprised that this is all that you have asked for. I guess the Office of
Special Affairs takes care of all the rest of your earthly needs.
Why not a new pickle jar?
Sincerely,
Steve
Steve Fishman
"Charlie" <tawny...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d3df3fe0.02121...@posting.google.com...
> "Steve Fishman" <xe...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:<M0fM9.273027$GR5....@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>...
> > "Diane Richardson" <ref...@bway.net> wrote in message
> > news:3e0087b9...@news.bway.net...
> > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:24:00 -0600 (CST), booboo...@webtv.net
> Perhaps when her current assignment is complete she can get trained to
> become a Product Officer for the SO. That way she could spend entire
> days looking for and complaining about the tiniest faults in others,
> yet never having to look at her own. This is a job she should truly
> excel at.
Charlie, it is evident that Diane Richardson has been doing just that for
many years, and her stats have been off the charts every Thursday at 2 in
screaming affluence.
All the Best,
Steve
Steve Fishman
"Martin Ottmann" <martin...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:71d327bb.02121...@posting.google.com...
> Hi Steven,
Dear Martin,
Life is very good away from Scientology. What they never teach you in the
cult is the obnosis of the first dynamic.
What I mean by that is, the reason it's called the first dynamic is that it
should come first. But Scientology asks you to sell yourself into slavery
for the sake of the third dynamic. Since I had that cognition, my life has
been very happy.
Uwe (Dr. Geertz) is still teaching psychology, has his thriving private
practice, and has the most magnificent garden in Southwest Ranches, Florida.
I will tell him you said hi.
Thanks for asking,
Steve
roger gonnet
Diane the parrot. Who should go near the psychiatrists that she's
supposed to help.
You'd better go to those clams you like so much,
Wishing you for Christmas, to get a dose of the cult you defend so well.
r
roger gonnet
"Tilman Hausherr" <til...@berlin.snafu.de> a écrit dans le message de
news: ph810vghduulccgiu...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:46:03 GMT, ref...@bway.net (Diane Richardson)
> wrote in <3e0033e0...@news.bway.net>:
>
> >On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:06:10 GMT, "Magoo" <mag...@worldnet.att.net>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>Steve...
> >>
> >>Thanks for posting these sites. What I've read so far is actually
> >>excellent.
> >>
> >>I hadn't seen them, and I'm happy you posted the links to them.
> >
> >Don't miss the legal filings where Armstrong declares how God
> >told him to sign the agreement with the CoS and take their
> >$800,000, then later how God told him to violate that same
> >contract and give away all his material possessions purchased
> >with the $800,000.
>
> ridiculing his religious beliefs.
Uh, when you see the god-bush in whom they trust, uh, I'd be rather
prudent... including about their monies.
r
roger gonnet
"Diane Richardson" <ref...@bway.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
3e01b669...@news.bway.net...
parroting again? Great.
get some help from LC, he's a master at that, diane.
r
roger gonnet
"Steve Fishman" <xe...@ix.netcom.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
YuAM9.235730$pN3.18403@sccrnsc03...
>
> "Martin Ottmann" <martin...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:71d327bb.02121...@posting.google.com...
> > "Steve Fishman" <xe...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:<o3fM9.395358$P31.145305@rwcrnsc53>...
>
> > Hi Steven,
>
> > > How could I ever leave such a fascinating place? ARS is my
favorite
> bedtime
> > > reading.
>
> > > Thanks, it is nice to be missed.
>
> > How are you doing? How is Dr. Geertz doing?
> > Greetings,
> > Martin
>
> Dear Martin,
>
> Life is very good away from Scientology. What they never teach you in
the
> cult is the obnosis of the first dynamic.
neither the true sense of "help" or "honesty"!
>
> What I mean by that is, the reason it's called the first dynamic is
that it
> should come first. But Scientology asks you to sell yourself into
slavery
> for the sake of the third dynamic. Since I had that cognition, my
life has
> been very happy.
>
> Uwe (Dr. Geertz) is still teaching psychology, has his thriving
private
> practice, and has the most magnificent garden in Southwest Ranches,
Florida.
Fine, Steve. Give him a hello from France. Say him he could see our
country as the first one forbidding scientology fraud.
Roger
Charlie
> On 19 Dec 2002 04:35:56 -0800, tawny...@hotmail.com (Charlie) wrote:
>
> >"Steve Fishman" <xe...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<M0fM9.273027$GR5....@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>...
> >> "Diane Richardson" <ref...@bway.net> wrote in message
> >> news:3e0087b9...@news.bway.net...
> >> > On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:24:00 -0600 (CST), booboo...@webtv.net
>
> >> > Fishman has Armstrong beat by a mile, Tigger. He was calling critics
> >> > who questioned him "OSA operatives" back when Gerry was still
> >> > trying to find the power switch on his pc.
>
> >> > Diane Richardson
> >> > ref...@bway.net
> >>
> >> Diane,
> >>
> >> Critics? The only ONE alleged "critic" I ever called an OSA Operative was
> >> YOU, Diane.
> >>
> >> And I still believe you are THE mole on the face of darkness.
> >
> >Perhaps when her current assignment is complete she can get trained to
> >become a Product Officer for the SO.
>
> Is that your current position in the Church of Scientology? I thought
> you were in Intel.
You didn't think that. You're just saying it to be nasty, as usual.
>
> >That way she could spend entire
> >days looking for and complaining about the tiniest faults in others,
> >yet never having to look at her own. This is a job she should truly
> >excel at.
>
> I guess it makes sense that your Church would reassign you after
> you so thoroughly flubbed your last assignment. Stacy must be
> so grateful to Rinder for assigning you to be her own personal
> PR. Too bad you did such a poor job at it.
>
> Good luck on your new assignment!
Classic Diane. You're either here to run ops or you've been in an
exceedingly foul mood for the past forty or so years.
>
>
> Diane Richardson
> ref...@bway.net