Physics In a Nutshell
David Findlay
Hash: SHA1
42.
Only joking... :-). I'm after a book that full of useful physics formulae
and short information on their use, but no examples. I'm currently
constantly referring to my high school physics book for obscure formulae
but there are ones it doesn't have that I want, such as Kepler's laws etc.
So does anyone know of a good book that isn't textbook style, but more a
cheat sheet for formulae? Thanks,
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9mC3sZOfFgbBAbXARArM9AJ9qbqikXopUvXvA/2BHQ8UEJ+LuzQCggUIR
UV7AW+fRJ4tk55vTFxHg+Jc=
=XIJ9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Dirk Van de moortel
"David Findlay" <da...@davsoft.com.au> wrote in message news:P5Wl9.12054$kd3....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> 42.
>
> Only joking... :-). I'm after a book that full of useful physics formulae
> and short information on their use, but no examples. I'm currently
> constantly referring to my high school physics book for obscure formulae
> but there are ones it doesn't have that I want, such as Kepler's laws etc.
> So does anyone know of a good book that isn't textbook style, but more a
> cheat sheet for formulae? Thanks,
>
Excellent and free:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/physics.pdf
More good stuff on
http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/
Dirk Vdm
Sam Wormley
> I'm after a book that full of useful physics formulae
> and short information on their use, but no examples. I'm currently
> constantly referring to my high school physics book for obscure formulae
> but there are ones it doesn't have that I want, such as Kepler's laws etc.
> So does anyone know of a good book that isn't textbook style, but more a
> cheat sheet for formulae? Thanks,
>
Benenson, et al, "Handbook of Physics", AIP Press (2002)
Lang, "Astrophysical Formulae" Vol I, II, Springer 3rd Ed (1999)
Woan, "The Canbridge Handbook of Physics Formulas", Cambridge (2000)
me...@cars3.uchicago.edu
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>42.
>
>Only joking... :-). I'm after a book that full of useful physics formulae
>and short information on their use, but no examples. I'm currently
>constantly referring to my high school physics book for obscure formulae
>but there are ones it doesn't have that I want, such as Kepler's laws etc.
>So does anyone know of a good book that isn't textbook style, but more a
>cheat sheet for formulae? Thanks,
>
volumes, you can get it from Dover for about $20.
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
me...@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
Tom Potter
"David Findlay" <da...@davsoft.com.au> wrote in message
news:P5Wl9.12054$kd3....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> 42.
>
> Only joking... :-). I'm after a book that full of useful physics formulae
> and short information on their use, but no examples. I'm currently
> constantly referring to my high school physics book for obscure formulae
> but there are ones it doesn't have that I want, such as Kepler's laws etc.
> So does anyone know of a good book that isn't textbook style, but more a
> cheat sheet for formulae? Thanks,
Download my one page, Physics Property Chart at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
It shows the relationships between the physical properties
much like the Periodic Chart shows the relationships between the elements.
With a little experience,
you can use the chart to instantly find equations,
such as Kepler's, Newton's, Ohm's Law, etc.
--
Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
-----= Posted via Newsfeed.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeed.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== 100,000 Groups! - 19 Servers! - Unlimited Download! =-----
Dirk Van de moortel
"Tom Potter" <t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:3d99...@post.newsfeed.com...
> *** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeed.com ***
>
>
> "David Findlay" <da...@davsoft.com.au> wrote in message
> news:P5Wl9.12054$kd3....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > 42.
> >
> > Only joking... :-). I'm after a book that full of useful physics formulae
> > and short information on their use, but no examples. I'm currently
> > constantly referring to my high school physics book for obscure formulae
> > but there are ones it doesn't have that I want, such as Kepler's laws etc.
> > So does anyone know of a good book that isn't textbook style, but more a
> > cheat sheet for formulae? Thanks,
>
> Download my one page, Physics Property Chart at:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
>
> It shows the relationships between the physical properties
> much like the Periodic Chart shows the relationships between the elements.
>
> With a little experience,
> you can use the chart to instantly find equations,
> such as Kepler's, Newton's, Ohm's Law, etc.
>
> --
> Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
No need to go to the PotterPageWithTheAnnoyingNoise
Access the table directly from
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#PotterTable
Dirk Vdm
Franz Heymann
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>
wrote in message news:Dwkm9.141229$8o4....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
>
[...]
>
> No need to go to the PotterPageWithTheAnnoyingNoise
> Access the table directly from
>
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#Pott
erTable
>
It is a pity Dirk did not start it in the days when "srp" (Andre
Michaud) was still a regular contributor. Perhaps he will re-emerge
from his cocoon one day, for our general amusement.
Franz Heymann
Spaceman
>That archive is beginning to be a magnificent repository of ignorance.
Yes,
but it is all Dirks ignorance.
<LOL>
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
http://www.realspaceman.com
Dirk Van de moortel
"Franz Heymann" <Franz....@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:ancoqk$bsl$1...@knossos.btinternet.com...
Oh yes, I remember.
Btw, srp is alive and kicking in fr.sci.physique:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=author%3Asrp
Unfortunately I do not have the time to translate the French
betises into English fumbles. There's more than plenty of it
though.
By the way, josX is translating all his own fumbles into
nl.wetenschap, "wetenschap" being Dutch for "science" ;-)
Dirk Vdm
Franz Heymann
>
> "Franz Heymann" <Franz....@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:ancoqk$bsl$1...@knossos.btinternet.com...
> >
> > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>
> > wrote in message
news:Dwkm9.141229$8o4....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > No need to go to the PotterPageWithTheAnnoyingNoise
> > > Access the table directly from
> > >
> >
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#Pott
> > erTable
> > >
> > That archive is beginning to be a magnificent repository of
ignorance.
> > It is a pity Dirk did not start it in the days when "srp" (Andre
> > Michaud) was still a regular contributor. Perhaps he will re-emerge
> > from his cocoon one day, for our general amusement.
> >
> > Franz Heymann
>
> Oh yes, I remember.
> Btw, srp is alive and kicking in fr.sci.physique:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=author%3Asrp
> Unfortunately I do not have the time to translate the French
> betises into English fumbles. There's more than plenty of it
> though.
My French is limited to reading a menu and ordering food & drink, so I
am denied the pleasure of following his french letters, if that is not a
rude expression.
>
> By the way, josX is translating all his own fumbles into
> nl.wetenschap, "wetenschap" being Dutch for "science" ;-)
My mother tongue is Afrikaans, which, as you no doubt know, is Dutch
without the grammar, so I would be able to follow his spoutings.
However, I have become bored with his repetitiveness.
Franz Heymann
>
> Dirk Vdm
>
>
Dirk Van de moortel
"Franz Heymann" <Franz....@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:ancts2$pmq$1...@helle.btinternet.com...
Hehe, he is more or less repeating what he has said before. You
haven't missed a lot. I'm sure he will come back soon enough.
> >
> > By the way, josX is translating all his own fumbles into
> > nl.wetenschap, "wetenschap" being Dutch for "science" ;-)
>
> My mother tongue is Afrikaans, which, as you no doubt know, is Dutch
> without the grammar, so I would be able to follow his spoutings.
> However, I have become bored with his repetitiveness.
Dat is interessant! Dat betekent dat we mekaar verstaan als
we onze eigen moedertaal gebruiken :-)
Op je gezondheid!
Dirk Vdm
------------------
"'n Tyd om te huil en 'n tyd om te lag,
'n tyd om te treur en 'n tyd om van blydskap te dans."
Franz Heymann
Baie dankie. Jy sal my natuurlik maklik verstaan, want ek praat 'n heel
eenvoudige Hollands.
Vir my is dit 'n bietjie moeiliker om jou te verstaan, want jy praat 'n
baie ingewikkelde Afrikaans.
Alles van die beste,
Franz Heymann
Tom Potter
Why not go to the horse's mouth, (Tom Potter)
rather than to the horse's ass? (Dirk Van de moortel)
If you want nice, clean oats,
it doesn't make sense to get them after
they pass through the horse.
Tom Potter
Dirk Van de moortel
"Tom Potter" <t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:f76e0bb3.02100...@posting.google.com...
> "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<Dwkm9.141229$8o4....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be>...
[snip]
> > No need to go to the PotterPageWithTheAnnoyingNoise
> > Access the table directly from
> > http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#PotterTable
>
> Why not go to the horse's mouth, (Tom Potter)
> rather than to the horse's ass? (Dirk Van de moortel)
A joke explained is a joke spoiled.
> If you want nice, clean oats,
> it doesn't make sense to get them after
> they pass through the horse.
A joke explained twice is a joke ruined.
Dirk Vdm
Spaceman
>Why not go to the horse's mouth, (Tom Potter)
>rather than to the horse's ass? (Dirk Van de moortel)
Sorry Tom,
you got that wrong,
Dirk is the horses crap.
He wishes he was as smart as the ass.
and he wishes he smelled like tha ass and not the crap he spouts.
Spaceman
>A joke explained is a joke spoiled.
OK,
Here is a hilarious one I won't explain.
Most will get it..
Dirk.
<ROFLOL>
Richard Herring
<Franz....@btopenworld.com> writes
Does Dirk preserve complete papers, or just Usenet snippets?
http://www3.sympatico.ca/wbabin/paper/michaud.htm
--
Richard Herring
Tom Potter
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:D_vm9.141968$8o4....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
It's interesting to see that a horse's ass ("Dick Van de moortel" )
thinks that two, true, complementary statements are jokes.
--
Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
Tom Potter
"Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
news:20021002082829...@mb-fp.aol.com...
> >From: "Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com
>
> >A joke explained is a joke spoiled.
>
> OK,
> Here is a hilarious one I won't explain.
> Most will get it..
>
>
> Dirk.
> <ROFLOL>
Shame, Shame!
Posting rotten, dirty, obscene, low brow jokes in a newsgroup.
Tom Potter
"Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
news:20021002082718...@mb-fp.aol.com...
> >From: t...@earthlink.net (Tom Potter)
>
> >Why not go to the horse's mouth, (Tom Potter)
> >rather than to the horse's ass? (Dirk Van de moortel)
>
> Sorry Tom,
> you got that wrong,
> Dirk is the horses crap.
> He wishes he was as smart as the ass.
> and he wishes he smelled like tha ass and not the crap he spouts.
My mistake.
I figured that if something
looked like a horse's ass.,
smelled like a horse's ass.,
acted like a horse's ass.,
and its' sole function was passing horseshit,
that it was a horse's ass.
--
Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
-----= Posted via Newsfeed.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
Tris
> *** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeed.com ***
>
>
> "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
> in message news:D_vm9.141968$8o4....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
> >
> > "Tom Potter" <t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:f76e0bb3.02100...@posting.google.com...
> > > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>
> wrote in message
> > news:<Dwkm9.141229$8o4....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be>...
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > No need to go to the PotterPageWithTheAnnoyingNoise
> > > > Access the table directly from
> > > >
>
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#PotterTa
> ble
> > >
> > > Why not go to the horse's mouth, (Tom Potter)
> > > rather than to the horse's ass? (Dirk Van de moortel)
> >
> > A joke explained is a joke spoiled.
> >
> > > If you want nice, clean oats,
> > > it doesn't make sense to get them after
> > > they pass through the horse.
> >
> > A joke explained twice is a joke ruined.
>
> It's interesting to see that a horse's ass ("Dick Van de moortel" )
> thinks that two, true, complementary statements are jokes.
>
> --
> Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
The poster has no sense of humour.
Tris
> *** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeed.com ***
>
>
> "Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
> news:20021002082829...@mb-fp.aol.com...
> > >From: "Dirk Van de moortel"
dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com
> >
> > >A joke explained is a joke spoiled.
> >
> > OK,
> > Here is a hilarious one I won't explain.
> > Most will get it..
> >
> >
> > Dirk.
> > <ROFLOL>
>
> Shame, Shame!
> Posting rotten, dirty, obscene, low brow jokes in a newsgroup.
>
> --
> Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
Crank orgy!
Spaceman
>Shame, Shame!
>Posting rotten, dirty, obscene, low brow jokes in a newsgroup.
sorry,
my bad.
:)
Spaceman
>My mistake.
>I figured that if something
>looked like a horse's ass.,
>smelled like a horse's ass.,
>acted like a horse's ass.,
>and its' sole function was passing horseshit,
>that it was a horse's ass.
He just formed himself to look like an ass.
:)
He has no passed anything and has only
picked up crap that was spread out over his field.
so ,
He was an optical illusion.
:)
He is the actual shit itself but costumed like an ass.
(that must have been what fooled you into thinking he was the
ass.
Actuall asses are smarter than crap like Dirk.
Dirk is one that has never researched a clock in his life.
(Stage one denial of physics time travelers)
:)
He is ..
the crap.
remove his mask and the smell get's even worse.
and no amount of wiping would clean his act up.
Spaceman
>Crank orgy!
Tris,
Got no clue still huh?
C.mon Tris,
tell all the "cause"
of time dilations!
<LOL>
Spaceman
>The poster has no sense of humour.
>
People with no "sense" can not detect senses of humor.
You are deaf and blind,
and most wish you were "without communication devices too"
and we know you are dumb since you have no clue
about HOW CLOCKS WORK.
Tris
"Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
> >From: "Tris" nu...@127.0.0.1
>
> >The poster has no sense of humour.
> >
>
> People with no "sense" can not detect senses of humor.
> You are deaf and blind,
> and most wish you were "without communication devices too"
Like who?
> and we know you are dumb since you have no clue
> about HOW CLOCKS WORK.
Are you using the 'royal' we, or are you talking about your imaginary
friends?
Tris
"Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
> >From: "Tris" nu...@127.0.0.1
>
> >Crank orgy!
>
> Tris,
> Got no clue still huh?
>
> C.mon Tris,
> tell all the "cause"
> of time dilations!
> <LOL>
C'mon loon, tell all how you've proved relativity is wrong!
Franz Heymann
"Richard Herring" <richard...@baesystems.com> wrote in message
news:sTVR4ONy...@baesystems.com...
Essentially only self-explanatory snippets, which means that some care
has to be taken in selecting suitable material.
Spaceman
<snipped troll crap>
Tris,
research all clocks you frelling puke troll.
trolling me "is not doing such"
You will never prove me wrong with your sad ass trolls.
and in fact.
each troll post you make proves me correct that you are a troll too.
Research all clocks.
Until you do.
You have trolling only.
I have the research.
I will not post it.
I expect "actual researchers to do some on thier own"
I showed the proof.
you have shown the trolling without proof.
You have SciFi Tris.
I have science.
You lose
(unless you are making a new movie for the SciFi channel)
<LOL>
Spaceman
>C'mon loon, tell all how you've proved relativity is wrong!
The paradox twins are the same revs of Earth, WRT the Sun, old.
SR = WRONG about twins and time.
"correct about atomic clocks only"
WRONG ABOUT ANY OTHER CLOCK.
YOU LOSE!
GET OVER IT DINGBAT!
OR lose forever.
Franz Heymann
Regarding Maxwell's geometry, the most elaborate description that I ever
came across of the space geometry that must underlie Maxwell's Theory
simply states that a magnetic field and an electric field orthogonally
intersect each other and that both of them intersect space at right
angle.
I offer the following, also from the same paper of Andre Michaud. It
decorates the pile of bullshit even better. Let Dirk vdM take his
choice.
QUOTE
Although I never saw this point being emphasized, it eventually became
obvious to me that the orthogonally intersecting magnetic and electric
fields envisioned by Maxwell could not reside within our 3-dimensional
space as we know it, since their intersection was defined as being
orthogonal to space itself. The logical conclusion I drew was that they
hinted at the existence of some unexplored extra-spacial dimensions.
UNQUOTE
Some time ago, I started collecting gems from that paper, but I was in
danger of getting a laughter-induced heart attack, so I stopped.
Franz Heymann
Tris
"Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
> >From: "Tris" nu...@127.0.0.1
>
> >C'mon loon, tell all how you've proved relativity is wrong!
>
> The paradox twins are the same revs of Earth, WRT the Sun, old.
>
> SR = WRONG about twins and time.
> "correct about atomic clocks only"
>
> WRONG ABOUT ANY OTHER CLOCK.
So it's correct about 'atomic clocks' but not any other clocks. Is this a
change in your position or have you maintained it since you started posting
to sci.physics?
<snip>
Tris
"Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
You are lying. You have no research that proves relativity theory wrong.
If your sad, ignorant little fantasy was real, you'd be making a fortune
from lecture tours, interviews, and book advances, instead of spending your
obviously valuable time replying to my 'trolling'.
Robert Kolker
Spaceman wrote:
> and we know you are dumb since you have no clue
> about HOW CLOCKS WORK.
And neither do you. But you sure know how used tires work.
Bob Kolker
Spaceman
>And neither do you. But you sure know how used tires work.
<LOL>
Spaceman
>You are lying.
No,
I speak truth.
clocks malfunction at different rates.
YOU LOSE!
>You have no research that proves relativity theory wrong.
Ignore the "same age twins" all your want dingbat.
It is emperical proof.
>If your sad, ignorant little fantasy was real, you'd be making a fortune
>from lecture tours, interviews, and book advances, instead of spending your
>obviously valuable time replying to my 'trolling'.
Maybe I will soon.
until then,
you still have SciFi instead of ""REALITY"
Tris
"Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
> >From: "Tris" nu...@127.0.0.1
>
> >You are lying.
>
> No,
> I speak truth.
> clocks malfunction at different rates.
> YOU LOSE!
>
> >You have no research that proves relativity theory wrong.
>
> Ignore the "same age twins" all your want dingbat.
> It is emperical proof.
No, it's your _opinion_.
> >If your sad, ignorant little fantasy was real, you'd be making a fortune
> >from lecture tours, interviews, and book advances, instead of spending
your
> >obviously valuable time replying to my 'trolling'.
>
> Maybe I will soon.
> until then,
> you still have SciFi instead of ""REALITY"
Good luck. I mean that sincerely.
Franz Heymann
"Robert Kolker" <bobk...@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:3D9B0381...@attbi.com...
Provide supporting evidence
Franz Heymann
Spaceman
>So it's correct about 'atomic clocks' but not any other clocks. Is this a
>change in your position or have you maintained it since you started posting
>to sci.physics?
>
I have always stated it is correct about the atomic clocks "malfunction"
only.
I have never stated the clocks do not show "different times"
I have stated.
It is wrong in stating "time changed" "as the cause of such"
and other clocks show the "different time changes" prove it wrong
about "time changing"
so.
My position has not changed at all.
The clock malfunctioned
Time has not changed rate at all.
and all clocks agree with me.
(not just one like GR,SR and QM allow)
Until you research all clocks, you are
missing the facts that do prove them all wrong about "time".
Or.
stay the ignorant time travel troll you are, forever "in time"
As I state and you refuse to do.
research all clocks.
Time does not change rate
clocks malfunction.
That is the FACT about the clock.
and it should not matter if it came from the rock I supposedly am.
It is still a fact!
Robert Kolker
Franz Heymann wrote:
> The last sentence is a mere assertion.
> Provide supporting evidence
He works for a used tire company. Right here in Massachussets not far
from where I live. Guess where I don't by my used tires.
Bob Kolker
Spaceman
>He works for a used tire company. Right here in Massachussets not far
>from where I live. Guess where I don't by my used tires.
Guess how wrong you are really?
<LOL>
You really have a problem with lying huh?
Show me where used tires are mentioned here
you lying sack fo shit asshole.
Spaceman
>"Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
>news:20021002103639...@mb-cg.aol.com...
>> Ignore the "same age twins" all your want dingbat.
>> It is emperical proof.
>
>No, it's your _opinion_.
No,
The Earth spins at one rate WRT the Sun for all.
it is not an opinion.
It is a measured fact all over this world.
you are a moron.
sheesh.
>Good luck. I mean that sincerely.
If you truly meant that,
you would have not posted the above lie
and you would research all clocks for once.
I see you have not researched any clocks yet at all.
for if you did.
you would not even bother arguing with such facts I post.
(unless of course, you are just a troll)
and that would be all your own problem that nobody else
can fix except you.
Dirk Van de moortel
>
>
> "Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message
> news:20021002082718...@mb-fp.aol.com...
> > >From: t...@earthlink.net (Tom Potter)
> >
> > >Why not go to the horse's mouth, (Tom Potter)
> > >rather than to the horse's ass? (Dirk Van de moortel)
> >
> > Sorry Tom,
> > you got that wrong,
> > Dirk is the horses crap.
> > He wishes he was as smart as the ass.
> > and he wishes he smelled like tha ass and not the crap he spouts.
>
> My mistake.
> I figured that if something
> looked like a horse's ass.,
> smelled like a horse's ass.,
> acted like a horse's ass.,
> and its' sole function was passing horseshit,
> that it was a horse's ass.
Title "Assfixations":
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#HorseAss
Dirk Vdm
Tom Potter
Title "Assfixations":
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#HorseAss
Dirk Vdm
Dirk's post is a classic example of what I call the "Horse's Ass Syndrome".
Immoral people commonly promote their personal agenda,
by consuming clean information,
passing the information through their system,
excreting it as horseshit,
and trying to equate the horseshit with the original information.
Note that the original thread went as follows:
1. Someone asked for an outline of physics.
2. I posted that my Physics Property Chart did this.
3. Kirk tried to divert the poster to horseshit on his personal web site.
4. I suggested to the poster that it was better to get his
information from the "horse's mouth" rather than from the "horse's ass".
5. After additional comments by "Spaceman" and I,
Dirk posted only the part that makes it look like he is the
one who was being attacked, rather than showing that he was the attacker.
Dirk's actions are equivalent to taking two sets of data,
and using only the cross-correlations that cater two one's
personal prejudice or agenda.
In other words, Dirk's positions are heavily biased toward his
prejudice or agenda, rather than truth and reality.
It is wise for true seekers of objective reality
to ignore the positions of people like Dirk, as they
tell you more about the person, than about objective reality.
A word to the wise.
Editorial comments, regurgitated information, and history books
are what comes out of a "horse's ass",
not what goes in the "horse's mouth".
If you want good, clean oats,
get them before they go through the horse.
By the same token,
if you want good, clean, accurate information,
get it from the "horse's mouth",
not from the "horse's ass".
--
Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
Dirk Van de moortel
"Tom Potter" <t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:3d9e...@post.newsfeed.com...
[snip a few horse's asses]
> --
> Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
Title: "Assfixations revisited already"
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#HorseAss2
No need to insist, two is enough.
Dirk Vdm