You might implement a room as a single object, but put into the room two
objects called "sides", which you can think of as throw rugs... if, upon
entering, the player examines or otherwise interacts with an object on one
"side" of the room, then you could move the player "on Autum's side" of the
room. The mimetic benefit to the player would be that the objects on the
other side of the room would stay in scope, but the parser could prefer
local objects if you type "examine bed" or whatever. Shared items (like the
door) would be in the same room as the two "sides".
I think it would be tedious to type "go north" four times to get to the part
of the hall that has room 7 to the east and room 8 to the west. If you put
all the doors in scope whenever you were in the hallway, players would
probably appreciate it.
--
Dennis G. Jerz, Ph.D.; (715)836-2431
Dept. of English; U Wisc.-Eau Claire
419 Hibbard, Eau Claire, WI 54702
------------------------------------
Literacy Weblog: www.uwec.edu/jerzdg
"nigelthezebra" <nigelt...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c424e9bf.02011...@posting.google.com...
How about a mimesis-breaking "side" command:
Your room is really messy <snip> Amber's side of the room is neat and lies to
the west.
> WEST
Try using the phrase "switch".
> SWITCH
You walk west into Amber's half of the room, hoping she doesn't catch you.
--
Sanity is a sure sign of a lazy mind.
Actually, I don't think this would disturb me as a player very much,
at least not if you changed the wording a little: instead of
"Autumn's side of the room is to the west," try something
like "The west side of the room is Autumn's". OK, that sounded a bit
clumsy, but my point is that if you consistently refer to
"the west half of the room" and "the east half of the room," then it
becomes very natural to move between them. So you'd get room
descriptions like
Room 309 (east half)
This is where your sister Carolyn spends her college days - or nights,
rather, since she basically uses the room to sleep in and nothing
else. Her roommate Autumn occupies the west half of the room.
>w
Room 309 (west half)
(Description of Autumn's belongings)
I'd be perfectly happy to play a game like this, and I think it would
be more transparent than having to type "go to autumn's room" when
all I wanted was to cross to the other half of the room I'm already
in.
Oh, and when you're outside, in the corridor, with lots and lots
of doors, I think the most convenient syntax would be
"enter room 309"; the corridor would be a single location and you
could "enter" any door you could see.
--
Magnus Olsson (m...@df.lth.se, m...@pobox.com)
------ http://www.pobox.com/~mol ------
I am of the opinion that putting an "awkward" type of near
meta-command in for moving the player is perfectly okay. Note it in
the game's help file or "about" routine and you're all right. I don't
think, for instance, that "go autumn's room" is worse than using
"north" or "south" or anything.
However, my opinion may be in the minority. In the last game I did I
allowed "enter door" and "exit door" to work for door navigation -- I
thought it simplified things, but I get the sense that instead it
added a level of caveman banter (or an unintended trip down QUESTPROBE
FEATURING THE HULK lane) to the thing. So having multiple ways to move
about is probably recommended. In your case, though, I agree with the
other posters: "switch" or "switch sides" would seem to be the easiest
way.
Robb
=-=-=-=-=-
Robb Sherwin, Fort Collins CO
Home Page: http://www.joltcountry.com
Anonymously Troll Ben Parrish's PWC2 Forum: http://www.voy.com/47897/
Well, obviously you should implement as many reasonable synonymous expressions
as you can think of but I think that players might react well to a physical
divider. (Besides, it's a good excuse to type CROSS THE LINE.)