Awareness Scales and Enlightenment
Koos Nolst Trenite
8 April 2003
You are NOT 'having a condition of'
'Aware' - or anything in between, down to - 'Not Aware,'
but you ARE
'Aware of something,' and you are 'Not Aware of something.'
And that in varying degrees.
And your 'Awareness of something' and your 'Awareness of some-
body' is, as you know very well, highly fluctuating with time.
There IS 'being - to some degree - Aware of something,' and there IS
'being - to some degree - Not Aware of something.'
Just look at what "very 'unaware' people" are VERY aware of.
And look at things and persons and conditions and circumstances
and past and future and other places and other people and his or
her own past and future, etc. etc. etc., that a VERY aware
person is ENTIRELY unaware of.
So you can be high up on any "scale of awareness" on some things,
while being indeed of very low awareness or entirely unaware of some
other things.
And there happens to be an infinity of 'somethings' to be aware of,
and so there are countless things that you are entirely unaware of:
Not to mention the number of people that exist, alone on Earth
already, people you are to some very slight degree aware of or
almost entirely unaware of.
So the idea to get you up such a "scale of awareness," on one thing,
or on a few things, or regarding some increased awareness about some
tiny fraction of yourself
(a tiny fraction of all that you could be but in practice never
will be aware of about yourself),
and then to tell you that "you are now 'Aware'," that you "have now
reached a state of full Awareness," is ...
And we have seen the results of that.
Once again, the poster concerned is thanked, this time for his con-
tribution to unraveling this millennia old mystery.
'Leonardo Been'
(Aware of having been Leonardo da Vinci)
References:
- 'Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent
Psychotics' (27 Feb 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0302271444.1b9b5a4f%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
- 'Compassion for past-life victims of L. Ron Hubbard' (6 Apr 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=989886.0304070229.3b929449%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
Copyright 2003 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it, and (or, if he can't learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included, to
others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious agenda, but only to educate, and to encourage people
to judge un-dominated and for themselves about any organizations
or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)
WILKA
Brilliant ARTicle! Laser-precise.
Thanks for shareing. It is indeed exactly as is.
One is aware OF things, BEings ect to varying DEGREES. Me looks at it as
SPHERE-of-Influence of SELF.
IT IS at all times 100%. This sphere may vary in altitude, longitude,
magnitude etc and QUALITY from BEing to BEing. Quality of influence relates
to self-chosen TONE-level and degree of RESPONSIBILTY.
Even a [insert favourite derogatory term] is 100% responsible for his/her
sphere, which s/he is 100% aware of and influences that by his/her means.
Change of mode, tone, increase of responsibility/ethics-level may open up
new doors to larger spheres of influence - Expansion to larger Games...
in fact i found it the only workable approach yet, to acknowledge a BEings
100%-Responsibilty and Causativeness AS IS - and N-COURAGE them to EXPAND
their GAME. In this they INCREASE their AWARENESS of what-IS. - AT THEIR OWN
PACE(M).
N-Couragement and love,
wilka - (being aware of BE-ing / no-body using some *meat.body* ;-)
--
"Your focus determines your reality"
www.freesolo.de.vu
Koos Nolst Trenite <Ambassador...@hotmail.com> schrieb in im
Newsbeitrag: 3b6f518d.03040...@posting.google.com...
Mr. Doobie
"Koos Nolst Trenite" <Ambassador...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b6f518d.03040...@posting.google.com...
Zzzz....
--
MR. DOOBIE
Sun in Taurus
Moon in Pisces
Cancer Rising
Mr. 4X
> Awareness Scales and Enlightenment
>
> 8 April 2003
>
> You are NOT 'having a condition of'
>
> 'Aware' - or anything in between, down to - 'Not Aware,'
>
> but you ARE
>
> 'Aware of something,' and you are 'Not Aware of something.'
> And that in varying degrees.
KOOK Nolst Trenite is nuts in 'varying' degrees.
Leonardo Been
"WILKA" <free...@freenet.de> wrote:
> Greetings Koos!
> Brilliant ARTicle! Laser-precise.
> Thanks for sharing. It is indeed exactly as is.
This 'Aware of something,' rather than just "Aware," applies of
course also to any other quality.
As much as I wish Yehudi Menuhin would have played the cello too,
he did not. He was highly capable on the violin, but not on a
cello.
But the diversity also applies to moral qualities such as courage.
Some persons, when they see a kitten drowning, would jump into the
water to save it. That's a high courage level, according to some.
Other persons, when they see a truck load of cattle fainting with
thirst, would knock the driver and tend to the animals. Very
high on the scale of courage, wouldn't you say?
Now when their best friend gets tortured and is about to be murdered,
they run away from him, and they have to then - and indeed do -
justify that, to themselves and to others,
for instance by telling others and publicly stating that "they
suddenly came to realize" that that friend must have been evil,
and deserves to be treated like that.
I am sure you have, if you have any memory at all, some emotion
about thusly having been deserted, and about the bewilderment of
suddenly being falsely accused
...even by those who claimed to you to be your best and eternal
friends
- but who apparently were so only as long as they could
enjoy the benefit and Energy of your presence without
having to defend or strengthen it when it gets attacked.
So these people are very courageous as it concerns some things, and
they are not, where it concerns other things. We won't mention any
names today, because it is now "we-don't-mention-names" week.
We can of course expand this to present-time politics and you get
people who do big business - with a person whom they know or see
engaged in torturing and murdering,
and they protect him and sell him the most sophisticated weapons,
and they wish him peace and for him to stay in power for as long
as he lives
- meaning as long as he sells oil cheaply to them and
orders bunkers, tunnels and palaces to be built by hem.
And they call that his international right, his sovereignty, his
internal affairs, and so on.
And they also do anything, of course, to vilify as "murderers" and
war-for-oil mongerers, and to falsely accuse
those who want to and who are actually exposing and putting an
end to the torturing and the murdering.
This time it is we - it is not hard for you to guess on which side I
fought - who won...
'Leonardo Been' (Koos Nolst Trenite)
Reference:
- 'Peace Demon(s)Traitors' (24 Mar 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=989886.0303240033.601e3021%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
Mr. Doobie
"Leonardo Been" <plato...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:989886.030409...@posting.google.com...
Zzzz....
Heffer
Nolst Trenite) wrote:
>Awareness Scales and Enlightenment
> 8 April 2003
>You are NOT 'having a condition of'
'Sane' - or anything like it, apparently...
The dog returns to its vomit, the ex-Scientologist returns
to his insane ways...
---
Heffer, OSA Lackey, H-Group
#315905 on the Dorian List
Regurgitating Propagandist
WILKA
989886.030409...@posting.google.com...
> You're welcome. Let's look at levels of courage too.
Greetings!
(just a few comments)
[...]
> Now when their best friend gets tortured and is about to be murdered,
> they run away from him, and they have to then - and indeed do -
> justify that, to themselves and to others,
>
> for instance by telling others and publicly stating that "they
> suddenly came to realize" that that friend must have been evil,
> and deserves to be treated like that.
hm - yes - but you also were talking alot of "evil" - at least in passed
posts...
favourite subject Mr.Hubbard...(?)
> I am sure you have, if you have any memory at all, some emotion
> about thusly having been deserted, and about the bewilderment of
> suddenly being falsely accused
whoever wishes "to accuse" me = assinging *ME* cause OVER them, indeed give
me THIER powers...
> ...even by those who claimed to you to be your best and eternal
> friends
there werent many at the spot written. I know Palle is. = originator of Free
Solo Processing.
> - but who apparently were so only as long as they could
> enjoy the benefit and Energy of your presence without
> having to defend or strengthen it when it gets attacked.
aye! - few seem capable of the latter.
> So these people are very courageous as it concerns some things, and
> they are not, where it concerns other things. We won't mention any
> names today, because it is now "we-don't-mention-names" week.
LOL - yeah - lets mention their names next week ;-)
its truely a-maze-ing how much people are willing to hurt themselves in
order to NOT feel, what they crave to feel ;-)
hurting others was regarded a nice means to NOT be hurt onself...
making-nothing of someone saved one from loSing someone...
hating was the shortcut for NOT having to engage in the Christ-Love
business...
> We can of course expand this to present-time politics and you get
> people who do big business - with a person whom they know or see
> engaged in torturing and murdering,
one step PAST that lies(!!!) FEAR...
> and they protect him and sell him the most sophisticated weapons,
> and they wish him peace and for him to stay in power for as long
> as he lives
we CAN ONLY - PEACE for PEACE and send as much LOVE and LIGHT as we can to
solve the lack of Love and Peace...and enLight the shadows of fear...
[...]
> This time it is we - it is not hard for you to guess on which side I
> fought - who won...
aye! - you "fought" - and fighting is just that - it begets "fighting".
GIVING UP fighting requires alot more courage than carrying on in the old
tracks...
You seem to be good at remote processing. Have you tried yer skills at the
shadow-politicians?
i mean - we cannot "bring light" to them - as lightbringing relates to the
Lightbringer - Lucifer - who´s a truely cute being(ness) btw. We can only
SEE and acknowledge their light and encourage them to shine it.
same goes for Mr.Hubbard. He´s a figure of the past. It makes not much sense
attacking him, as past figuers arent occupied by live spirit. But one can go
into the past and solve his case either from HIS viewpoint. The O5ers say
"merge with the obstacle" (or "be" the obstacle?) - or from his auditors
viewpoint - and that was a good friend as far as i know. Solving case
requires alot of affinity for the being concered - admiration if you will...
Theres many attention-beams from live-PT-spirits to that past-figure, i
guess these also resolve, when the "Hubbard-Case" is solved inside-out...
Love and Trust!
;-)
wilka
--
"Your focus determines your reality"
www.freesolo.de.vu
Leonardo Been
I am so glad to have found that you and I, per * and per ** (see
below), are the only ones
who are not mind-controlled!
We must have "risen above the 'bank',"
(the "memory-banks" of "aberration," as a well-known
mind-controller and impersonator called it around 1950
and since).
* 'Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent
Psychotics' (27 Feb 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0302271444.1b9b5a4f%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
** '[20030307] (not issued yet)
from which I quote:
' As you know, you and I are exceptions to this - we
' are not subjected to these things, of course...
and
' - again, not from you or from me, of course, because we are
' the only ones who are immune to such things being done to us -
and
' Rather repulsive, isn't it, but now you know what a
' "love"-spell is made of. So you will, I hope, be less
' likely to fall for it, after you have read and understood
' this.
'
' Of course this does not apply to you and me...
' We will always continue to fall for such deception,
' even if we do very thoroughly know about its existen-
' ce:
'
' We understand the mechanisms, but we are not
' aware of it, the moment when and by whom these
' are used on us.
Quoted by kind permission of myself, Koos Nolst Trenite.
Leonardo Been
'So you can go on and on with stating truth and submitting evidence
' - but it is for them only a reason the more to deny it or to
' invalidate it, and to more fiercely or more cleverly oppose and omit
' what is true and relevant.
Quoted, indeed, from
- 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Truth'
(19 August 2002 - Version 1.2)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.02090...@posting.google.com&output=gplain
WILKA
> Greetings Wilka!
Greetings Koos!
> I am so glad to have found that you and I, per * and per ** (see
> below), are the only ones
;-) - actually me doesnt consider the "only-one"-status(!) any appealing at
all.
look at all those (loneLie!) "onLie-ones" on this NG - it spoils coplay -
cocreation - co-whatever...
onLie-ones are the root, the seed of cultism - guruism. plus it puts a
person at risk, claiming "to be an only-one".
(smells of GPM btw - speaking in scn-ers-terms).
> who are not mind-controlled!
being / having three feet outside the "system/trap" works quite well.
> We must have "risen above the 'bank',"
LOL - whats a "bank" anyway? - me considers my "universe" my "mind" - a
storage-system of creations - play-stuff... - con-dense-d pARTicles, waves,
energies - Light and Sound/Vibration/Oscillation...with a little meaning
assigned to it...
> (the "memory-banks" of "aberration," as a well-known
> mind-controller and impersonator called it around 1950
> and since).
me doesnt even agree to "labellings" as they TOO function as mind-control.
"Dont look in this direction!" - "Must-avoid this person!" - "Must condemn
this being(ness)!" - "Must be something/someone else!" - the old
"good-bad"-duality - Devi(l)de and overrule...
As a (sad) matter off-act, beings in opposition to another being, take up
the caracteristix of the opposed being(ness). "You become what you fight.".
Thus the legion of Anti-Hubbards ACT like Hubbard in one way or another...
...does act in a hubbardite manner - or what they beLIEve his manners
were...
...thus the hubbardists werent able to create a safe space...
hey - look - me has a little "seriousness" left about a couple of issues.
I read your posts years ago, liked something about the outstanding
viewpoints you presented - some was incomprehensible for me (ME;-), noticed
when you left the NG, read alot of the reasons - coulndt make ANY sense of
that...
it isnt on me "to judge" - i just strongly belive "things" dont happen just
so.
in yer last post i snipped the part about drowned-kittens...[no comment]...
someone drowned in your vicinity, right...(?).
now the authorities "labellings" dont mean much to me - its NO indicator for
anything.
but beings in bad shape or NO shape at all - might well be an indicator for
a NOT-safe space...
Jesus CHRIST! - what went wrong?
as it appears to me - theres not much difference to the UNsafe-spaces the
hubbardist-CofS creates - just that they seem to be fond of dehydrating
bodies.
unfortunately me had some attention on that - lies beyond my current
comprehension (date written).
might well be the CoS was about to "drown/dehydrate" another kitten.
That young guy from LA is missing since march 23rd. Phonecall gave me the
creeps - 90seconds low-tone-happy-trails. Who the F*ck cares? the
super-duper-free?zone seems as nuts as the unfreezone...
courage? - me never claimed to have any...
(lacking words)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0302271444.1b9b5a4f%40posting.
google.com&output=gplain
read the post - good stuff! - guess that about what is called a "Lightbody"
by the lightworkers - it contains all life-information - all codings etc...
> ** '[20030307] (not issued yet)
>
> from which I quote:
>
> ' As you know, you and I are exceptions to this - we
> ' are not subjected to these things, of course...
> and
>
> ' - again, not from you or from me, of course, because we are
> ' the only ones who are immune to such things being done to us -
>
> and
> ' Rather repulsive, isn't it, but now you know what a
> ' "love"-spell is made of. So you will, I hope, be less
> ' likely to fall for it, after you have read and understood
> ' this.
;-) - it is ALL spells - THE SPELLing - WORDS! - its all in the langwitch
;-)
...in the beginning there was the word - and the word was with(?) god..
blabla...
my current work deals alot about that stuff - not yet out.
> ' Of course this does not apply to you and me...
> ' We will always continue to fall for such deception,
> ' even if we do very thoroughly know about its existen-
> ' ce:
> '
> ' We understand the mechanisms, but we are not
> ' aware of it, the moment when and by whom these
> ' are used on us.
in fact is is pretty simple to re_VERSE "spells" - "implanting" was to a
great deal about that.
examining the mechanisms of implants and RE_verSing it unveils the mightiest
tools...
Best wishes!
wilka
--
"Your focus determines your reality"
www.freesolo.de.vu