Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent Psychotics

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Koos Nolst Trenite

unread,
Feb 27, 2003, 5:44:23 PM2/27/03
to
Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent Psychotics

27 February 2003

My physics professor pointed out that I did not know what the energy
of a molecule of air was - and thus having been made aware, I did
study what I did not know, and as a result I got a high score on
my exam of the physics that deals with gasses, and with heating them
up and cooling them down and so on - the branch of physics called
Thermodynamics.

If you consider gas to be a collection of very tiny golf
balls, then you can solve all Thermodynamics problems very
easily.


From 'The Nature of the Cosmos' (preferably Version 2.0 or later -
see the section References, below) we know the definition of Life
Energy Particles - and also quite something about what it does and
how it behaves and so on.


So how does a Genie (Arabian spirit) get caught in a bottle? How do
you get closed in, inside a body? Right, by means of Life Energy
Particles.

Those very things - remember? - that "don't exist," according
to charlatans and quacks and kooks.


Life Energy Particles are causing you to have awareness of your
environment, of yourself, etc.

And Life Energy Particles transmit (store and convey, relay) percep-
tions and also thoughts, emotions and so on.

Take the Life Energy Particles away, and awareness goes away, or
perception goes away, or memory goes away, or ability to hold
your own viewpoint, and what you knew very well, etc. goes away.

Put (project) Life Energy Particles there around someone, with
some emotions and feelings and thoughts in those Life Energy
Particles, and that's what he feels, and what he gets as
thoughts.


That's what is being done to you all the time, and that is how
you are being mind-controlled.

Not you of course, because "you are the only one who is
immune to other Life Energy Particles and to being mind-
controlled."

Everyone else is, but "they are not" - or so it seems when
you hear certain people talking, or when you read their
writing, including all those who are thought of as knowing.

Some call it even "electronics," to confuse you even
further on the subject. (I won't mention any names.)


You can't keep a person inside a body or inside a bottle, unless you
mess (and have messed very severely, in the past) around with his
Life Energy Particles, which he uses for perception and for feelings
and for thoughts and memories, in short, for being aware, for living
- as you know from 'The Nature of the Cosmos.'

Life consists entirely of the activity of creating and moving
around and changing or imprinting or connecting with Life Energy
Particles.

And as you know from 'The Nature of the Cosmos,' matter itself
is made up of Life Energy Particles.

But you can also track down the experiments, and the re-
corded observations of that for the last century or two.
In other words, do not take my words for it.

Always go and look yourself, but you can use me to tell
you what to look for to see whether it exists - if you are
not in the category of yourself being a criminal mind, of
course, detectable as such by your intentional and mali-
cious omission of vital and applicable truths, and by your
insertion of lies and other distractions.

OK, so they - criminal minds that is - throw Life Energy Particles
around you with certain contents.


And they also throw broken Life Energy Particles around you, that
connect to you, with one end (broken Life Energy Particles that you
connect to at one end), but these are broken to the effect that they
don't have anything (no 'handle') at the other end, with which to
connect to things, and so you feel, you sense ...nothing.

Like a telescope at night that has a cap on the other end - you
observe that there is "nothing."

Indeed, you sense ('perceive' is what a spiritually educated
person would say), that there is "nothing" to perceive.


And people of criminal mind take away, pull away, and smash away,
Life Energy Particles of yours, with which you are aware and with
which you hold a viewpoint and with which you remember things.

And so you lose awareness, or fail to get it.

Again, this does not happen to you of course, only to
others.
You are exceptionally immune to any form of mind-control.


Criminal minds do however not like that I tell you this, because
they are doing these things all the time - they are "clever" - it is
how they operate in life, or "on life" you better say. I don't think
that they should be allowed to inflict all these things on people,
but they see that quite differently, of course.

(And they keep it a secret too - Life Energy Particles "do
not exist."
Anybody who talks about Life Energy Particles "is insane:"
"Nobody is harming anybody." "You do it all to yourself."
And so on.
Hospitals full of sick people, "who do it all to themsel-
ves.")

So we come to the point now, which is one persistent, violently psy-
chotic person who keeps on throwing out the wildest and most insane
lies even though he has all the proof that he throws out lies, and
that his lies are psychotic -

(psychotic defined as 'intentionally harmful to life'
regardless of whether he wants to be aware or not, of it
being harmful to life what he does).


He has been immersed in Life Energy Particles that prevent much of
his connection to be aware of and to understand his environment
correctly.
Indeed, he is quite insane, per 'Definition Of Insane.' (See
References)


And he does not like that, but he does not know and does not want to
know what Life Energy Particles are, and what he certainly does not
want to know:

Life itself IS basically 'handling Life Energy Particles.'


He has been debilitated by the criminal minds who did this to him, to
that extent - and as part of the messing around with his Life
Energy Particles - that he denies the existence of Life Energy
Particles.

He denies, and has been compelled especially to deny, those very
Life Energy Particles that have been thrown around him, like a
cocoon of thoughts and feelings.

And he denies the existence of those very Life Energy Particles,
in which he is immersed so as to exclude his own perception -
that is, to shut down the perception

(I say 'perception,' but you would call it his 'sensing' or
his 'feeling,' and some would say his 'thinking' or
'reasoning,' because you think of perception as light and
sound, which is only a very, very small part of all the
things that you are - consciously or subconsciously -
sensing, sensing continuously, even in your sleep)

that he would have been doing with his own, self-created Life
Energy Particles if he could penetrate the mist, the cloud, the
cocoon of contaminated Life Energy Particles ('Bad Energy' as
you call it), in which he is immersed by a criminal mind.


And he does not like to be in that condition, and he has a pretty
good idea who did it to him, as you can read almost daily in his
very angry writing - he is mad as hell at this person

who has been sufficiently mentioned as a major source of
evil and deception and lies, and who maintains a subversi-
ve organization with USA tax exemption. (But we won't
mention any names, today.)

Now that criminal mind, who did this to him, apparently did a trick,
and that trick is the subject of this present article actually - the
part of the subject-title that is 'To Understand Persistent, Violent
Psychotics'.

The criminal mind who did it to him

- again, I won't mention his name because it gets so boring,
let's call him Voldemort, or Sauron, or the Source, to be
somewhat in tune with present day society's awareness of
these things; and let's call his helpers 'Agent Smith,' to
synchronize with the movie The Matrix that really is about
these very things (but you will forget that anyway as soon
as you start reading the next sentence) -

that criminal mind, apparently did the simple trick, of adding to
the mental cocoon of this Persistent, Violent Psychotic - some Life
Energy Particles with the content that he, the Persistent, Violent
Psychotic about whom I am talking now, "has won, has vanquished, has
conquered, has bested, has defeated his tormentor."

And indeed, there are many people - not you of course -
walking around here as 'un-feathered bipeds,' who are very
convinced that they have bested such mind-controllers or
criminal minds, and who are convinced that "they them-
selves are clear in mind, are free of perception and are
in full awareness of their environment and of the people
in it."


(They are nevertheless fascinated by the movie The Matrix,
but they say they are so for "totally different reasons.")


And now I come along, and the Persistent, Violent Psychotic feels -
by my presence, by my words, by my radiating truth

(yes, indeed - you are an intelligent reader - it is with
my own Life Energy Particles, that I am)

making criminal minds and their actions somewhat more perceptible.

(Or as you would say it, making them 'being sensed,' 'being
felt,' 'being considered to exist,' 'thought about,' and
so on - my doing so by the fact that I hold a viewpoint on
them with my own Life Energy Particles, by my 'Energetic-
ally' holding a viewpoint, by my 'being' as some would
express it.)

In this way, I destroy or touch upon the very forceful Delusion he
suffers, his Delusion that "he is free from and has defeated the
criminal mind(s) who did control his thoughts."

And now here comes the 'upshot,' the 'punch-line,' the 'point' - or
'pointe' as the French say, they like to make things sound just a
tiny bit softer:

In order to restore and reinforce his Delusion that "he is the
conqueror who defeated evil and who masters it" - he has to
destroy me, and goes about it in wild and unfettered abandon.

So call him what you will, but this is apparently what he is caught
in and why he does what he does.

And I thought this was a good example to demonstrate to you the use
of having an understanding of Fine Particle Physics.

As my Thermodynamics professor, Mr. Borghouts (he even wrote a book
about it) told me:

'You have to know that they are Particles, and you have to know
what Energy these Particles have.'

Little did he know...


Koos Nolst Trenite "Cause Trinity"
human rights philosopher and poet

'Men of all nations came
to listen to Solomon's wisdom,
sent by all the kings of the world,
who had heard of his wisdom.'

1 Kings 4:34
References:

- 'The Nature Of The Cosmos As Seen From Earth (Version 1.0)
(29 August 2001) [or preferably the next Version, 2.0i]
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0211060029.323b80d9%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain

- 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Truth'
(19 August 2002 - Version 1.2)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.02090...@posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain

- 'The Mafia Code Against Mankind' (18 Oct 2002)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0210180308.42416a71%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain

- 'Aftermath On Teri Garr - Promoting Drugs Instead Of Health'
(10 November 2002)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0211101444.6f982200%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain

- 'Popularity of Threshold-Perception Entertainment
- Some Applicable Quotes' (26 Sept 2002)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0209260300.1583bcb1%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain

- 'Handling Psychosis And Compulsions - A Definition Of Psychosis
- Definition Of Compulsion' (15 Sept 2002)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0209151128.190028c3%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain

- 'Mozart Remedying Spiritual Violence - Fine Particle Physics
- Beauty and Awareness' (20 August 2002)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=c172dd8d.02082...@posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain

- 'Defining Love and Hate - A Law of Life (Definition)'
(29 July 2002)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=9ed8f96d.0208041252.218c3dc6%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain


Copyright 2003 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it, and (or, if he can't learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included, to
others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious agenda, but only to educate and encourage people
to judge un-dominated and for themselves about any organizations
or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)

Immortalist

unread,
Feb 27, 2003, 6:06:00 PM2/27/03
to

"Koos Nolst Trenite" <Ambassador...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b6f518d.03022...@posting.google.com...

> Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent Psychotics
>
> 27 February 2003
>
>
> My physics professor pointed out that I did not know what the energy
> of a molecule of air was - and thus having been made aware, I did
> study what I did not know, and as a result I got a high score on
> my exam of the physics that deals with gasses, and with heating them
> up and cooling them down and so on - the branch of physics called
> Thermodynamics.
>
> If you consider gas to be a collection of very tiny golf
> balls, then you can solve all Thermodynamics problems very
> easily.
>
>
> From 'The Nature of the Cosmos' (preferably Version 2.0 or later -
> see the section References, below) we know the definition of Life
> Energy Particles - and also quite something about what it does and
> how it behaves and so on.
>
>
> So how does a Genie (Arabian spirit) get caught in a bottle? How do
> you get closed in, inside a body? Right, by means of Life Energy
> Particles.
>
> Those very things - remember? - that "don't exist," according
> to charlatans and quacks and kooks.
>
>
> Life Energy Particles are causing you to have awareness of your
> environment, of yourself, etc.
>

It would seem more consistent to replace "Life Energy Particles" with;
Confluence and Interleaving of Life Processes.

LCS27

unread,
Feb 27, 2003, 8:44:18 PM2/27/03
to
In article <3b6f518d.03022...@posting.google.com>

Ambassador...@hotmail.com (Koos Nolst Trenite) wrote:
>
> Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent Psychotics
>
> 27 February 2003
>
>
>

Yawn.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.


Mr. XXXX

unread,
Feb 28, 2003, 12:22:05 PM2/28/03
to
Ambassador...@hotmail.com (Koos Nolst Trenite) wrote:

> Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent Psychotics

Is there material that explains persistent, funny kooks like you?

<flush rest of crap>

Mr. XXXX

unread,
Feb 28, 2003, 12:23:11 PM2/28/03
to
Those links have been line wrapped.

"Immortalist" <Reanima...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> "Koos Nolst Trenite" <Ambassador...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> message news:3b6f518d.03022...@posting.google.com...
>> Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent Psychotics

<snip>

>> References:
>>
>> - 'The Nature Of The Cosmos As Seen From Earth (Version 1.0)
>> (29 August 2001) [or preferably the next Version, 2.0i]
>>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0211060029.323b80d9%40pos

> ting. google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain


>>
>> - 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Truth'
>> (19 August 2002 - Version 1.2)
>>

> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0209090620.508a3d65@posti
> ng.go ogle.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain


>>
>> - 'The Mafia Code Against Mankind' (18 Oct 2002)
>>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0210180308.42416a71%40pos

> ting. google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain


>>
>> - 'Aftermath On Teri Garr - Promoting Drugs Instead Of Health'
>> (10 November 2002)
>>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0211101444.6f982200%40pos

> ting. google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain


>>
>> - 'Popularity of Threshold-Perception Entertainment
>> - Some Applicable Quotes' (26 Sept 2002)
>>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0209260300.1583bcb1%40pos

> ting. google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain


>>
>> - 'Handling Psychosis And Compulsions - A Definition Of Psychosis
>> - Definition Of Compulsion' (15 Sept 2002)
>>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0209151128.190028c3%40pos

> ting. google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain


>>
>> - 'Mozart Remedying Spiritual Violence - Fine Particle Physics
>> - Beauty and Awareness' (20 August 2002)
>>

> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=c172dd8d.0208221432.47cf68ae@posti
> ng.go ogle.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain


>>
>> - 'Defining Love and Hate - A Law of Life (Definition)'
>> (29 July 2002)
>>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=9ed8f96d.0208041252.218c3dc6%40pos

> ting. google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain

Immortalist

unread,
Feb 28, 2003, 5:45:24 PM2/28/03
to

"Mr. XXXX" <rando...@trc.invalid.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9330BB70...@195.228.240.20...

> Those links have been line wrapped.
>

I compressed such concerns off onto Bill Gate's behavior by default.

Leonardo Been

unread,
Feb 28, 2003, 10:14:55 PM2/28/03
to
'Criminal minds do however not like that I tell you this, because

'they are doing these things all the time - they are "clever" - it is
'how they operate in life, or "on life" you better say. I don't think
'that they should be allowed to inflict all these things on people,
'but they see that quite differently, of course.'

quoted from:

- 'Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent
Psychotics' (27 Feb 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0302271444.1b9b5a4f%40posting.google.com&output=gplain

Robert Bronsing

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 3:52:01 AM3/1/03
to

"Koos Nolst Trenite" <Ambassador...@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:3b6f518d.03022...@posting.google.com...

> Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent Psychotics
>
> 27 February 2003
>
>
> My physics professor pointed out that I did not know what the energy
> of a molecule of air was -

Are you *sure* your "professor" said "a molecule of air"? If so, he
shouldn't be a professor of anything, let alone fine particle physics....


--

Robert Bronsing

But that's okay, see the children bleed
It'll look great on the TV


Leonardo Been

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 11:47:59 AM3/1/03
to
The response made to the original post is not even a pedantic.

(Pedantic: Marked by a narrow focus on or display of learning,
especially its trivial aspects.)


So what does apply to the respondent generally, to all his posts, and
to his nature obviously:

'Contrary to their reversals of truth, and contrary to their
intentionally false accusations, criminally-minded individuals
actually do know very well what the truth is, else they would not
know what so intensely to hide and fight and destroy and what to
reverse, and else they would not know so well whom to falsely accuse.


'This applies to all people who intentionally and knowingly omit
important truth which, by omission of it, causes harm to a person or
to people.
'They know very well what the truth is, else they would not omit it so
very loudly.

'Again:
They know very well what the truth is, else they would not know what
to omit so very loudly.

'So you can go on and on with stating truth and submitting evidence
- but it is for them only a reason the more to deny it or to
invalidate it, and to more fiercely or more cleverly oppose and omit
what is true and relevant.


from:


- 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Truth'
(19 August 2002 - Version 1.2)

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.02090...@posting.google.com&output=gplain

Robert Bronsing

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 12:40:40 PM3/1/03
to

"Leonardo Been" <plato...@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
news:989886.030301...@posting.google.com...

Am I to understand that you defend the position that there's such a thing as
"molecule of air"?
And, that my denial of the existance of "molecules of air" is proof of my
"Criminal mind"?

<g>

Koos Nolst Trenite

unread,
Mar 2, 2003, 9:42:45 AM3/2/03
to
The phrase 'a molecule of air' of course is assumed to mean

'a molecule of one of the constituent components of air'

as any reader knows the fact that air is a composite of different
gasses (mainly the gas called Nitrogen and the gas called Oxygen).


So we shortened

'any of the constituent component gasses of air'

to

'air'

as the article concerned* is not a course in chemistry.

And the knowledge of that nature of air is assumed, and correctly so,
to exist with the reader.


___________
Definitions:

The energy [no capital 'e'] of a particle [no capital 'p']

(basically, how much physical impact it can cause)

is expressed in terms of its velocity [no capital 'v']

(in the case of the air in a room, that is its temperature,
how fast the air-particles move, and bang into things to
transmit their energy, which is called heat)

and mass [no capital 'm']

(weight, according to how much force changes its motion)

of these particles.

(Anybody knows the formula too, if you use the 'c' as the
symbol for the more or less 'c'onstant velocity of light:

e=mc^2

[impact-energy of a particle is proportional to its mass
(you knew that, of course, having been hit or crushed
to death many a life time)
and increases with the square of its velocity
(which is less obvious, but generally known to
science since some three hundred years, and experien-
ced from having been shot to death in many a life
time)].)


So for calculations of the energy contained in a large amount of gas
- as is the subject of Thermodynamics - you like to know the mass
(weight) of a molecule

(a molecule is, roughly, the smallest part of matter that
you get by dividing something without loosing its charac-
teristics).


Koos Nolst Trenite "Cause Trinity"
human rights philosopher and poet

'Once you have flown,
you will walk the earth
with your eyes turned skyward,
for there you have been,
there you long to return.'

Leonardo da Vinci


* 'Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent

Copyright 2003 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher

D.L.Rogers

unread,
Mar 2, 2003, 10:23:36 AM3/2/03
to
Sorry, but your definitions are incorrect, consistently, and complicate your
whole statement. For example, "weight" and "mass" are definitely not the
same; mass is a measure of inertia, and weight is a measure related to the
gravity of Earth. Energy is not a measure of impact, as it exists even when
impact is impossible (important in considering "black energy"). Temperature
is not identical to the total kinetic energy of a volume of air. And so on.

Your whole statement about air and molecules fails to deal with some
well-known analyses, such as by Brown (the namesake of "brownian movement").

I really wish you would stick to psychology. And there you really need to
quit trying to apply the analysis of particle physics to human behavior. It
doesn't transfer, and a knowledgeable student of particle physics knows
that. For example, many people have used the "Heisenberg principle" in
reference to human behavior and assessment; but they were unaware that the
mathematics of the Heisenberg principle do not apply to anything larger than
the atomic scale, not even to molecules.

I appreciate and admire your efforts, but you need to recognize that many
others have analyzed the same issues as you, and have made wonderful
progress that is well beyond the point where you find yourself.

Dan R.
Master of Card XII
Order of the detrevnI Buckyball


"Koos Nolst Trenite" <Ambassador...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:3b6f518d.03030...@posting.google.com...

Joel M. Eichen

unread,
Mar 2, 2003, 11:50:42 AM3/2/03
to

D.L.Rogers <dlro...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:v648fl3...@corp.supernews.com...

> Sorry, but your definitions are incorrect, consistently, and complicate your
> whole statement. For example, "weight" and "mass" are definitely not the
> same; mass is a measure of inertia, and weight is a measure related to the
> gravity of Earth. Energy is not a measure of impact, as it exists even when
> impact is impossible (important in considering "black energy"). Temperature
> is not identical to the total kinetic energy of a volume of air. And so on.


REPLY:

Weight, mass, I am not sure which one, but Jan Drew claims the mercury fillings have settled down into her feet and she cannot jump
around like she used to ......

Any truth in that?


Joel M. Eichen

Robert Bronsing

unread,
Mar 2, 2003, 5:05:10 PM3/2/03
to

"Koos Nolst Trenite" <Ambassador...@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:3b6f518d.03030...@posting.google.com...

> The phrase 'a molecule of air' of course is assumed to mean
>
> 'a molecule of one of the constituent components of air'
>
> as any reader knows the fact that air is a composite of different
> gasses (mainly the gas called Nitrogen and the gas called Oxygen).
>
>
> So we shortened
>
> 'any of the constituent component gasses of air'
>
> to
>
> 'air'
>
> as the article concerned* is not a course in chemistry.

It may not be a course in chemistry, but the entire article becomes shaky
when you use ignorant phrases like that.


>
> And the knowledge of that nature of air is assumed, and correctly so,
> to exist with the reader.
>
>
> ___________
> Definitions:
>
> The energy [no capital 'e'] of a particle [no capital 'p']
>
> (basically, how much physical impact it can cause)
>
> is expressed in terms of its velocity [no capital 'v']


Wrong definition. Better def of energy would be "the capacity to do work".

>
> (in the case of the air in a room, that is its temperature,
> how fast the air-particles move, and bang into things to
> transmit their energy, which is called heat)
>
> and mass [no capital 'm']
>
> (weight, according to how much force changes its motion)

Mass is totally different from weight. Weight arises from the action of an
acceleration field on mass.
Mass represents the amount of matter in a particle.

Get your definitions right first.

Leonardo Been

unread,
Mar 3, 2003, 3:51:09 AM3/3/03
to
The respondent un-tarred and un-feathered biped (to quote Plato)
is well-described by


'They know very well what the truth is, else they would not know what

to omit so very loudly.

'So you can go on and on with stating truth and submitting evidence
- but it is for them only a reason the more to deny it or to
invalidate it, and to more fiercely or more cleverly oppose and omit
what is true and relevant.

'And this includes those quiet and seemingly very "rational" indivi-
duals who try to get themselves placed and then accepted as an
"authority," or as "a 'normal' person" and even as "an 'impartial'
person," or even more distasteful than that, as "a 'caring' person."

'Generally, and however unjustly to the animal kingdom it may be,
such individuals are - by those who look through them - compared to
various members of the domesticated or wild fauna.

'Also these "very 'rational,' 'normal' and 'impartial'" types do
know very well what truth to intentionally omit, and what parts or
details not to omit to still seem credible and accepted.


from, indeed,

- 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Truth'
(19 August 2002 - Version 1.2)

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.02090...@posting.google.com&output=gplain

Leonardo Been

unread,
Mar 3, 2003, 4:10:25 AM3/3/03
to
As stated earlier, the respondents are not even pedantic

(Pedantic: Marked by a narrow focus on or display of learning,
especially its trivial aspects.)


Criminal minds do know mostly very well that they are criminal minds,
so them asking me or anyone to confirm it for them, is in fact
merely their intention to try and deceive, and is an act of decep-
tion by them to try and conceal (hide, camouflage) their condition,
by the usual means that criminal minds employ, as follows.


As stated earlier, what does apply to the respondent generally, to


all his posts, and to his nature obviously:

'Again:


They know very well what the truth is, else they would not know what
to omit so very loudly.

'So you can go on and on with stating truth and submitting evidence
- but it is for them only a reason the more to deny it or to
invalidate it, and to more fiercely or more cleverly oppose and omit
what is true and relevant.'


from:


- 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Truth'
(19 August 2002 - Version 1.2)

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.02090...@posting.google.com&output=gplain

0 new messages