Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Truth (Version 1.2)
Koos Nolst Trenite
19 Aug 2002
version 1.2
Contrary to their reversals of truth and contrary to their
intentionally false accusations, criminally-minded people do
actually know very well what the truth is, else they would not know
what so intensely to fight and destroy and to reverse, else they
would not know whom to falsely accuse.
I will repeat that, because it might be too simple, too un-confusing,
too clearly stated, for it to be grasped at first glance:
Contrary to their reversals of truth, and contrary to their
intentionally false accusations, criminally-minded individuals
actually do know very well what the truth is, else they would not
know what so intensely to hide and fight and destroy and what to
reverse, and else they would not know so well whom to falsely accuse.
This applies to all people who intentionally and knowingly omit
important truth which, by omission of it, causes harm to a person or
to people.
They know very well what the truth is, else they would not omit it so
very loudly.
Again:
They know very well what the truth is, else they would not know what
to omit so very loudly.
So you can go on and on with stating truth and submitting evidence
- but it is for them only a reason the more to deny it or to
invalidate it, and to more fiercely or more cleverly oppose and omit
what is true and relevant.
They reverse things even so far, that your good intentions are
actually called 'bad' intentions by them. And the evidence for your
good intentions is used by them to suggest or even to "prove you
have bad intentions."
These are not pleasant characters. It is their whole conviction and
feeling that any truly good intention - which always involves
connecting to truth - is "a bad intention." It's because you expose
what they are and what they do, it exposes criminals* like them, it
"harms them" and individuals like them - it exposes truth. And
that's too bad indeed ...for them.
And this includes those quiet and seemingly very "rational"
individuals who try to get themselves placed and then accepted as an
"authority," or as "a 'normal' person" and even as "an 'impartial'
person," or even more distasteful than that, as "a 'caring' person."
Generally, and however unjustly to the animal kingdom it may be, such
individuals are - by those who look through them - compared to
various members of the domesticated or wild fauna.
Also these "very 'rational,' 'normal' and 'impartial' " types do know
very well what truth to intentionally omit, and what parts or
details not to omit to still seem credible and accepted.
They are no less criminal.*
They occur in any - also any trusted - profession, in any ideology,
any religion, any science, any race, any nation, any organization:
It's individuals that you have to look at, not just at systems which
hide or foster those individuals.
This then proves by the simple expedient of pointing out their
intentional and knowing, harmful omissions, that these individuals
are - knowing, fully aware, intentional and premeditating -
criminally and willfully, meaning intentionally, insane, that is to
say, destructively irrational, knowingly irrational with the
premeditated and organized intention to cause harm to another.
The observation is further corroborated (supported) usually by their
hidden or open Hate or Envy, which is a main ingredient of all
actual insanity and of all actual criminality.
They don't dare to define Insanity or Criminality - I do.
They don't dare to define Love - I do.
They don't dare to define Hate - I do.
They don't dare to define Tolerance - I do.
They don't dare to define Friendship - I do.
They don't dare to define Truth - I do.
They don't dare to define Civilization - I do.
It's because they are criminals,* and any correct and therefore
all-encompassing definition of the above-listed concepts would
largely contribute to their exposure.
I have spent two life times now to study them, and mind you, it was
no fun - but someone had to do it. And many claimed solutions and
explanations, but, obviously - telling from the state of affairs,
and from the data presented by them - nobody researched deeply
enough to understand why it keeps persisting, nor deeply enough to
detect, to understand and so to prevent crime, war, drug abuse and
similar ills ...before these are 'hitting.'
Not the very wise 'gurus', not the scientists, not the religious
leaders, not the clairvoyants, not the therapists. Everybody was
either too scared, or too irresponsible, or too narrow in scope, or
simply lacking the huge amount of Love and care and the total
absence of Hate, that is apparently necessary to be able to do so.
Koos Nolst Trenité "Cause Trinity"
human rights philosopher and poet
* Footnote:
As can be learned elsewhere in most of my writings, I am defining
'criminals' as individuals who have the permanent intention to
oppose, hinder or destroy Life, for instance per 'Definition of Love
and Hate - a Law of Life' of 29 July 2002
Copyright 2002 by Koos Nolst Trenité - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it, and (or, if he can't learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included, to
others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious agenda, but only to educate and encourage people to
judge undominated and for themselves about any organizations or
individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)
References:
- Defining Love And Hate - A Law Of Life (29 July 2002)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0208010221.73b4364b%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain
- 'Mozart Remedying Spiritual Violence - Fine Particle Physics
- Beauty and Awareness' (20 August 2002)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=c172dd8d.02082...@posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain
- The Second Mozart-Effect - Connecting To Your Own Past (3 Sept 2002
- Version 1.1)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.02090...@posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain
- Religious Tolerance (01 Nov 1995, revised 22 Oct 1996)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=199610242259.XAA22021%40hera.easynet.de&oe=utf-8&output=gplain
- A Poem of Love and Adventure (17 July 2002)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0207171309.1696976a%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain