Present: mitchell, dbaron, blizzard, scc, bart, brendan, dawn, ben, myk,
leaf.
*1.5.1 Release*
- Should respin mac builds for Bug 217121, which has been fixed.
- localeVersion needs to remain the same as for 1.5, so localizations
will work (leaf)
- Should be able to release this week.
*1.6a Release*
- Issues with windows release build creation, could delay release a day
or two.
- Final (?) fixes going in today, should allow for candidate creation
tomorrow and release to follow.
*Website Update*
- dbaron, dawn making excellent progress on buglist.
- Meeting tomorrow with primary parties to finalize bugs to finish
before release. (dbaron, bart, dawn, ben, chofmann)
*CD*
- Re-master 1.5 CD, including localizations when we get them and 1.5.1
mac.
- Timetable depends on localizations; guess is 2 weeks.
*Localizations*
- Localizations ought to be automatically produced when possible (leaf
to investigate)
- Leaf to talk with Andreas about getting localized bits when automated
builds not possible.
- localeVersion shouldn't be tied to milestone version, for cases like
beta->final (leaf filed bug 223884)
*Download logs*
- Myk has made some progress gathering data, still blocked on getting
access logs from mirrors.
Leaf
I'm sorry, but this seems to be incredibly backwards. A crash that
happened when you clicked on any link that the browser could not handle
was not respin-worthy, but this is? Both bugs are 10.1-only (according
to the 2003-11-03 minutes), so it's not like one affected more users
than the other...
Also, OSX 10.1 was released in late 2001. This makes it newer than all
but the newest Windows version... I suspect the number of users of OSX
10.1 is fairly high as a fraction of total OSX users; the problem is
that Mozilla developers don't use it (the fact that our build
instructions say we don't build on OSX 10.1 may have something to do
with that).
-Boris
Alex
--
Alex Bishop
al...@mozillazine.org
http://www.mozillazine.org/
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>> - Should respin mac builds for Bug 217121, which has been fixed.
>
> I'm sorry, but this seems to be incredibly backwards.
Note that I wasn't present at this meeting; chofmann or asa are the best
people to contact about this.
Gerv
> These minutes are actually for Monday 27th October, right?
Yep.
Gerv
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>
>> - Should respin mac builds for Bug 217121, which has been fixed.
>
>
> I'm sorry, but this seems to be incredibly backwards. A crash that
> happened when you clicked on any link that the browser could not
> handle was not respin-worthy, but this is?
The main main forcing function for the Mac 1.5.1 respin was indeed the
crash related to
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213639
That should have been listed in the meeting notes.. 213639 has landed
on the branch and will be picked up in the release
> Both bugs are 10.1-only (according to the 2003-11-03 minutes), so it's
> not like one affected more users than the other...
>
> Also, OSX 10.1 was released in late 2001. This makes it newer than
> all but the newest Windows version... I suspect the number of users
> of OSX 10.1 is fairly high as a fraction of total OSX users; the
> problem is that Mozilla developers don't use it (the fact that our
> build instructions say we don't build on OSX 10.1 may have something
> to do with that).
>
> -Boris
> _______________________________________________
> Mozilla-seamonkey mailing list
> Mozilla-...@mozilla.org
> http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-seamonkey
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>
>> - Should respin mac builds for Bug 217121, which has been fixed.
>
>
> I'm sorry, but this seems to be incredibly backwards. A crash that
> happened when you clicked on any link that the browser could not
> handle was not respin-worthy, but this is?
The main main forcing function for the Mac 1.5.1 respin was indeed the
crash related to
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213639
That should have been listed in the meeting notes.. 213639 has landed
on the branch and will be picked up in the release
> Both bugs are 10.1-only (according to the 2003-11-03 minutes), so it's
> not like one affected more users than the other...
>
> Also, OSX 10.1 was released in late 2001. This makes it newer than
> all but the newest Windows version... I suspect the number of users
> of OSX 10.1 is fairly high as a fraction of total OSX users; the
> problem is that Mozilla developers don't use it (the fact that our
> build instructions say we don't build on OSX 10.1 may have something
> to do with that).
>
> -Boris