Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Scott
.r!kard
"Scott Hathaway" <sc...@hcsprogramming.com> wrote in message
news:c6354815.03093...@posting.google.com...
Basically i think you have to write your own SMTP-server if nobody else
hasn't done it already...
.r!kard
".r!kard" <rn...@algonet.se> wrote in message
news:blc1kt$ooe$1...@green.tninet.se...
.r!kard
".r!kard" <rn...@algonet.se> wrote in message
news:blc1ss$p54$1...@green.tninet.se...
I think he's asking for a mini-firewall. In other words, is something
he doesn't know about sending messages on port 25?
John Roth
.r!kard
"John Roth" <newsg...@jhrothjr.com> wrote in message
news:vnj6j3d...@news.supernews.com...
I've got no idea where you would put that kind of hook
in Windows.
John Roth
I would also be interested in something similar, but then for MSN
traffic. Decoding the MSN Messenger stream is not the problem, capturing
the traffic from a promiscous nic in Python is where I get stuck.
>>Now you got me corious, is that possible in python?
>>Possibly by extending it with som C of course...
>
>
> I've got no idea where you would put that kind of hook
> in Windows.
>
> John Roth
<snip>
*pheew* that was some real hardcore Googeling I can tell you...
.r!kard
"Rudy Schockaert" <rudy.sc...@pandora.be> wrote in message
news:5Uieb.49566$Lw6.2...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
.r!kard wrote:
> Google rules:
> http://home.student.utwente.nl/g.v.berg/btk/
This one is for unices only, no Windows.
> http://pycap.sourceforge.net
From the Todo.txt file:
* Make this work on Windows. I briefly struggled with compiling using
VC7 under Win XP
using winpcap_ and LibnetNT_. No luck, and was getting some rather
interesting errors
about missing header files which appeared to be where they should be :-/.
> http://www.ghaering.de/python/unsupported/pylibpcap/
This could be a candidate if it were available for Python 2.3.x . It's
for Python 2.2 only now.
> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/python-list/1578279
Further down the thread:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/python-list/1578500
Gerhard Häring wrote:
> http://www.ghaering.de/python/unsupported/pylibpcap/
> I'll check if the sniff.py example will work, too.
It doesn't look like it does. I may have introduced a subtle bug or some
more changes are needed to make it useful under win32.
If anybody wants to continue the win32 port, it's open source and you
can continue where I stopped.
-- Gerhard
Out of luck again :-(
>
> *pheew* that was some real hardcore Googeling I can tell you...
>
> .r!kard
>><snip>
:)
Scott
"Rudy Schockaert" <rudy.sc...@pandora.be> wrote in message
news:7tkeb.49855$CW5.2...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
Grab SWIG and you can probably get something working in a few hours.
Last time I did this it took about 40 minutes to get working, and a
few hours to push it out so others could use it as well.
Extra bonus points for making it use either winpcap or libpcap
depending on the OS built on. ;)
-Geoff
>It seems you've looking where I've earlier this week ;-) I'm affraid
>there's nothing for Python on Windows yet.
>
>.r!kard wrote:
>
>> Google rules:
>> http://home.student.utwente.nl/g.v.berg/btk/
>
>This one is for unices only, no Windows.
>
>> http://pycap.sourceforge.net
-Geoff Howland
http://ludumdare.com/
Normally a mail program does not connect directly to the receiving
server, but sends all mail via a "relay" server which talks SMTP.
For example, if you have an ISP connection, your mail would go through
their server, which would forward it to the appropriate final destination.
Why do you need to *intercept* SMTP traffic, when you could simply
modify the "outgoing server" setting for your mail program, and then
run a proxy SMTP server which would receive your mail, do the processing
you want, then forward the results to the original server?
-Peter
Although some "programs" have their own embedded smtp servers that
attempt to connect directly to the recipients 'domain' before sending
its payload... A small service that could catch this use-case would be
useful for a number of friends of mine <wink/sigh>. (I think I know just
the way to distribute it to get maximum effect too <grin>).
just-barely-joking'ly
-- bjorn