OT: photo of Trotsky (WAS Celebrities with reputation as nice guys or a**holes?)
Ian McDowell
> I was going to post a point by point reply, but why? You are the most
> "sanctimonious dickhead" of them all. You sit at home and wallow in
> self pity. (You know why. I don't need to embarrass you.) Then after
> working up enough anger at God for having forsaken you, you lash out
> in a trollish manner against your obvious betters.
>
> I'm sorry your life sucks. It isn't my fault, but I feel bad for you
> all the same. However, even though I have everything you don't
> (talent, wit, friends) you do have something that I don't. Time.
Greg seems to be putting it to industrious use in these photos from
his new website. He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
Glory that is Singh:
http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/about_us.html
http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/contact_us.html
Despite the first-person-plural on the "Contact Us" page, Jupiter
Audio seems to be a one-man operation. I think the name quite
appropriate. Whether due to Greg's bellicosity or because he's one of
the larger bodies in this solar system, I'll leave up to you. His
entire website is worth reading, particularly for anyone whose grammar
or spelling he's criticized.
trotsky
Wow, Ian, you're quite obsessed. Clearly Todd, in the interest of
fairness, will have to say something. But please, tell us (and pardon
the use of "us"), what do you do for a living? You're not afraid of a
little quid pro quo, are you? Or is that only available "in the dojo?"
rande...@rrogers.com
wrote:
His concept of a "good" subwoofer is interesting, but likely not
very good in practice. In fact, it rather sounds like someone
putting a speaker driver into the cardboard box their refrigerator
came in.
-Rich
trotsky
rande...@rrogers.com wrote:
> His concept of a "good" subwoofer is interesting, but likely not
> very good in practice. In fact, it rather sounds like someone
> putting a speaker driver into the cardboard box their refrigerator
> came in.
How bad is your hi-fi, Rich?
Dawn Taylor
>Greg seems to be putting it to industrious use in these photos from
>his new website. He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
>styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
>from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
>Glory that is Singh:
>
>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/about_us.html
>
>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/contact_us.html
Seems he yanked it down mighty quick -- I keep getting "this page
unavailable" messages. Apparently he's shy.
But heck, I already saw it when you e-mailed it to me before.
Dawn
Sean O'Hara
small and I can only see this blob in a fungus-green T-shirt. (Which
makes the shoggoth comparison even more apt.)
--
Sean O'Hara
Gibberish in Neutral: http://diogenes-sinope.blogspot.com/
Ian McDowell
If he yanked it (the page, I mean), it's back up now, as clicking on
the link upstream still loads it fine in my browser. Just in case,
though, I saved the incriminating jpegs for future reference.
trotsky
When will you be posting your picture for comparison, studly?
bod
"Ian McDowell" <mcdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6a88873e.03091...@posting.google.com...
lol...ficking classic, that page is still up there...as far as i can tell
with his attitude and putting the image of him together...well it just
figures folks!!
i love getting idiots like this sacked from their jobs as a hobby!!
--
regards from BOD!
"dont worry yoko, its only a friggin water pist...."
JOHN LENNON 1980
see bod pissing in the wind at...
www.bodland.co.uk the home of bod!
trotsky
I can send you pictures of my dick if it will help get you through the
night.
Robert Lee
mcdol...@hotmail.com (Ian McDowell) wrote:
> If he yanked it (the page, I mean), it's back up now, as clicking on
> the link upstream still loads it fine in my browser.
I can't get either. In fact, I can't get to the site at all. I wouldn't
mind seeing what Twatsky looks like--anybody want to email the pic to me?
--Robert
--
Do not sit next to Dennis
trotsky
bod wrote:
> "Ian McDowell" <mcdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6a88873e.03091...@posting.google.com...
>
>>Dawn Taylor <dawn...@pacifier.com> wrote in message
>
> news:<0ni6mv80to4grupi0...@4ax.com>...
>
>>>On 13 Sep 2003 07:30:22 -0700, mcdol...@hotmail.com (Ian McDowell)
>>>announced in front of God and everybody:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Greg seems to be putting it to industrious use in these photos from
>>>>his new website. He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
>>>>styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
>>>
>>>>from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
>>>
>>>>Glory that is Singh:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/about_us.html
>>>>
>>>>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/contact_us.html
>>>
>>>Seems he yanked it down mighty quick -- I keep getting "this page
>>>unavailable" messages. Apparently he's shy.
>>
>>If he yanked it (the page, I mean), it's back up now, as clicking on
>>the link upstream still loads it fine in my browser. Just in case,
>>though, I saved the incriminating jpegs for future reference.
>
>
> lol...ficking classic, that page is still up there...as far as i can tell
> with his attitude and putting the image of him together...well it just
> figures folks!!
> i love getting idiots like this sacked from their jobs as a hobby!!
Can you explain that last bit, bod? My sister lives in London and she
may just pop by to show you some creative things with a screwdriver.
bod
"Robert Lee" <cranch...@youknowwhattodo.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:cranchingwire-B7E...@news.west.earthlink.net...
> I can't get either. In fact, I can't get to the site at all. I wouldn't
> mind seeing what Twatsky looks like--anybody want to email the pic to me?
>
> --Robert
no probs robert...i got the idiot...you can see the fat twat here..wow, i
resisted the obvious poke with a stick, sometimes i amaze myself!
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/bodland/contact_top.jpg
Robert Lee
<bodster(nospam)@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> no probs robert...i got the idiot...you can see the fat twat here..wow, i
> resisted the obvious poke with a stick, sometimes i amaze myself!
So it's the guy with his arm over his face? That's...anticlimactic.
bod
LOL!!!
i bet the fucker has to ask to go to the toilet when hes at work!!
Sean O'Hara
<bodster(nospam)@ntlworld.com> declared...
>
> "Ian McDowell" <mcdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6a88873e.03091...@posting.google.com...
>
> > the link upstream still loads it fine in my browser. Just in case,
> > though, I saved the incriminating jpegs for future reference.
>
> lol...ficking classic, that page is still up there...as far as i can tell
> with his attitude and putting the image of him together...well it just
> figures folks!!
> i love getting idiots like this sacked from their jobs as a hobby!!
>
ruin his life.
Besides, being Trotsky should be punishment enough, in a Sartre
kinda way.
Sean O'Hara
>
> > lol...ficking classic, that page is still up there...as far as i can tell
> > with his attitude and putting the image of him together...well it just
> > figures folks!!
> > i love getting idiots like this sacked from their jobs as a hobby!!
>
> Can you explain that last bit, bod? My sister lives in London and she
> may just pop by to show you some creative things with a screwdriver.
>
Maybe if you stopped being an asshole this wouldn't happen.
bod
"Sean O'Hara" <darkerthenightth...@myrealbox.com> wrote in
message news:MPG.19cd57de7...@news.cis.dfn.de...
and putting the image of him together...well it just
> > figures folks!!
> > i love getting idiots like this sacked from their jobs as a hobby!!
> >
> Why? Greggy-poo may be a loser, but that's no reason to go out and
> ruin his life.
if i have spanners like him sacked...its only because they interfere with my
own work, i cant tolerate morons when i heve to get something done!
twats like this have no one to blame but themselves, they are their own
worse enemys!
Sean O'Hara
>
> > I've had no problem getting the page, though the picture is pretty
> > small and I can only see this blob in a fungus-green T-shirt. (Which
> > makes the shoggoth comparison even more apt.)
>
> When will you be posting your picture for comparison, studly?
>
source images are much larger, but I had to compress them to fit in
the blog, so if you want a better view, right click and select
"view image" or "view image source".
Bombsquad
bod wrote:
I bet thats the first thing he does when he shops at his local Wal-Mart.
Hits the can, marking his territory with his pudgy little fingers.
Bombsquad
trotsky
Sean O'Hara wrote:
> In the Year of the Goat, the Great and Powerful trotsky declared...
>
>>>lol...ficking classic, that page is still up there...as far as i can tell
>>>with his attitude and putting the image of him together...well it just
>>>figures folks!!
>>>i love getting idiots like this sacked from their jobs as a hobby!!
>>
>>Can you explain that last bit, bod? My sister lives in London and she
>>may just pop by to show you some creative things with a screwdriver.
>>
>
> Aw, whozza matta Twotsky? Is evewyone being mean to you?
>
> Maybe if you stopped being an asshole this wouldn't happen.
Do you have an actual problem with schizophrenia or do you just come off
that way on Usenet? Perhaps you're such a basket case that you can't
even remember what you posted two messages ago.
bod
"Bombsquad" <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3F63A530...@yahoo.com...
> Hahahaha, does everybody love Trotsky?
>
> I thought THEY CALL ME..MR SINGH! only contaminated Alt.horror with his
bloated presence. I swear to God, I
> would love to see that fat bastard pull a Chuck Yeager off a building one
day.
>
> Bombsquad
>
hey bomb...i bet you were killing yourself to post "the internet is white
mans magic...and dont you forget it!!"
fucking lol!!
trotsky
Sean O'Hara wrote:
> In the Year of the Goat, the Great and Powerful trotsky declared...
>
>>>I've had no problem getting the page, though the picture is pretty
>>>small and I can only see this blob in a fungus-green T-shirt. (Which
>>>makes the shoggoth comparison even more apt.)
>>
>>When will you be posting your picture for comparison, studly?
>>
>
> Ask and ye shall receive. Just click on the link in my .sig. The
> source images are much larger, but I had to compress them to fit in
> the blog, so if you want a better view, right click and select
> "view image" or "view image source".
Oh dear. You look like the nerdy guy from "American Splendor".
trotsky
Bombsquad wrote:
> Hahahaha, does everybody love Trotsky?
>
> I thought THEY CALL ME..MR SINGH! only contaminated Alt.horror with his bloated presence. I swear to God, I
> would love to see that fat bastard pull a Chuck Yeager off a building one day.
Come and get me, anonymouse. I'll wipe the pavement with your face.
Bombsquad
bod wrote:
No Comment.
(but, I''m sure he's got more then enough Chicken bones lying around his living
room, bedroom, office...)
Bod, you're seriously the funniest fucker, I ever met!
Bombsquad
Sean O'Hara
>
>
> > Ask and ye shall receive. Just click on the link in my .sig. The
> > source images are much larger, but I had to compress them to fit in
> > the blog, so if you want a better view, right click and select
> > "view image" or "view image source".
>
> Oh dear. You look like the nerdy guy from "American Splendor".
>
But you're quite right, apart for being Irish, about a foot taller,
forty years younger, wearing glasses, having a full head of hair,
and not stooping over, I look exactly like that guy from American
Splendor.
Yes, Greggy-poo, I'm a nerd. You've found me out. I've read Beowulf
in the original Anglo-Saxon. I can write HTML. I can replace
hardware in my computer. I watch Star Trek. I read a book per week.
I can quote Monty Python skits verbatim. I'm sure everyone here
will be shocked -- shocked! -- to learn that a nerd is posting to
Usenet.
But I'm a nerd with a social life, who goes to parties, who has
friends -- even real, honest-to-goodness female friends whom I
don't treat with contempt as though they're gormless halfwits
incapable of using the Internet. And I post to Usenet for the
challenge of a good debate and fun discussions, not because its
the be-all-end-all of my social life and the only way I can get
people to pay attention to me.
Trotsky, you are a sad man. Instead of putting yourself forward as
pinata, why don't you go out for a walk, maybe take a trip to the
local bar, or maybe go down to the multiplex and see if you can
mack on the usherettes. Find something to do instead of being
acted upon and maybe people wouldn't treat you with utter
contempt.
Sean O'Hara
>
>
> bod wrote:
>
> > "Bombsquad" <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:3F63A530...@yahoo.com...
> >
> > > Hahahaha, does everybody love Trotsky?
> > >
> > > I thought THEY CALL ME..MR SINGH! only contaminated Alt.horror with his
> > bloated presence. I swear to God, I
> > > would love to see that fat bastard pull a Chuck Yeager off a building one
> > day.
> >
> > mans magic...and dont you forget it!!"
> > fucking lol!!
> >
>
> (but, I''m sure he's got more then enough Chicken bones lying around his living
> room, bedroom, office...)
>
Does this mean he'll kill himself forcing Winona Ryder and Angelina
Jolie to go on the lam together?
trotsky
Sean O'Hara wrote:
> In the Year of the Goat, the Great and Powerful trotsky declared...
>
>>Sean O'Hara wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ask and ye shall receive. Just click on the link in my .sig. The
>>>source images are much larger, but I had to compress them to fit in
>>>the blog, so if you want a better view, right click and select
>>>"view image" or "view image source".
>>
>>Oh dear. You look like the nerdy guy from "American Splendor".
>>
>
> Harvey Pekar or Paul Giamatti?
Toby, the self-proclaimed nerd. Did you not see the movie?
> But you're quite right, apart for being Irish, about a foot taller,
> forty years younger, wearing glasses, having a full head of hair,
> and not stooping over, I look exactly like that guy from American
> Splendor.
Which guy? Is this one of those "Who's on first?" routines?
> Yes, Greggy-poo, I'm a nerd. You've found me out. I've read Beowulf
> in the original Anglo-Saxon. I can write HTML. I can replace
> hardware in my computer. I watch Star Trek. I read a book per week.
> I can quote Monty Python skits verbatim. I'm sure everyone here
> will be shocked -- shocked! -- to learn that a nerd is posting to
> Usenet.
>
> But I'm a nerd with a social life, who goes to parties, who has
> friends -- even real, honest-to-goodness female friends whom I
> don't treat with contempt as though they're gormless halfwits
> incapable of using the Internet. And I post to Usenet for the
> challenge of a good debate and fun discussions, not because its
> the be-all-end-all of my social life and the only way I can get
> people to pay attention to me.
>
> Trotsky, you are a sad man. Instead of putting yourself forward as
> pinata, why don't you go out for a walk, maybe take a trip to the
> local bar, or maybe go down to the multiplex and see if you can
> mack on the usherettes. Find something to do instead of being
> acted upon and maybe people wouldn't treat you with utter
> contempt.
Sean, you clearly don't get out much, so I'm going to explain to you
what is going on here. First, a very simple life lesson: it takes two
to tango. Nobody on this forum is either fine or upstanding, nor are
they interested in truth, justice or the American way. Each of the
respondents, in their own ways, are sorry sacks of shit. To think they
are innocent and I'm the "bad guy" makes you very naive and/or George W.
Bush. Since we're being judgemental here, let's go down the list of
respondents to this thread. Let's start with Ian, the sickest and
sorriest of the bunch:
Poor Ian. His mother, who died of cancer, used to read "Lord of the
Rings" to him as a bedtime story. How do I know this? Because he's
said so on this newsgroup *at least* three times, appropos of nothing.
That's a huge red flag, obviously. But do I pay attention? No. For
some reason, I found something else to hang him on, and that was that.
Ian, the supposed nice guy, started making all sorts of racist remarks
about my Indian heritage. Racism, how sad is that? But that wasn't
enough for Ian, because he's pretty deranged. He kept on trying to get
my goat verbally and I kept on beating him back down. He couldn't
handle it, so he took it outside the group. Perhaps you know this stuff
already, who knows. His big move was sending me flowers at work. It
was only mildly embarrassing, but it was also very strange. The poor
guy wasn't so far gone as to try anything really nuts, so that was what
he came up with. Whatever. Months passed, he tried one other trick
which really didn't work out the way he expected, and now this thread.
But sure, there's something wrong with *me*.
Dawn Taylor. The first thing you have to know about here is that she's
a coked out slut from L.A. who can't own up to her past. I don't know
why. She has no trouble being forthcoming about her opinion of Demi
Moore's pubic hair (seriously), but when I asked her straight up how
many times she's done coke, she couldn't answer. (Just like Dubya!)
She and Ian think they have one up on me (or something), but for some
reason every time they try and confront me directly they slink back in
the woodwork whence they came. She's lied about killfiling me several
times, and I bust her for it each time. She's slime, basically.
Kenny Crudup. Not much of a player--you can draw your own conclusion.
Rich/Rander. He's nuts, obviously, but not quite in the clinical way
that Ian is. If somebody can be described as a pinata it's probably him.
"bod"/"Bombsquad"/Robert Lee. Alt.horror losers/regulars, mostly
anonymous, complete cowards. I'm amazed at how many people, especially
anonymous pieces of shit like these types, are afraid of words on a
screen. You have to wonder what else they're afraid of. "I'm anonymous
and I killfiled you!" What? Does that even make sense? I see these
types and think, "How do people get this fucked up?"
Oh, I forgot John Harkness. Again, not much of a player. Apparently
he's a movie critic, which we both know isn't a particularly honorable
profession. Acts like he jerks off to pictures of Hillary Duff in short
skirts every night.
Did I miss anybody? Do you care to revise your bullshit story yet,
Sean? I like Usenet from a sociological perspective--you get to see the
best and worst in people--usually the worst. I'm like you, in a way: I
enjoy a good discussion when available. I'm different, though, in that
I'm not afraid to use these people for target practice when they have it
coming--and God knows they do. I equate it to playing a first person
shooter video game, except you don't get the opponents in video games to
piss and moan the way these people do. My failing is that I refuse,
perhaps stupidly, to remain anonymous throughout the proceedings,
because anonymity is for wimps and terrorists.
I would really advise you to re-think your position, Sean--I doubt you
want to go a few rounds with me.
WareWolf
A guy whose address, location and phone # is now outed to all of USENET
might consider being a little more careful about threatening people.
Dusty
--
This Week's Column: The God Squad: Let Us Roll
http://dusty.booksnbytes.com/columns/2003/2003_0907.html
bod
"trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
news:3F63ABF4...@email.com...
> Come and get me, anonymouse. I'll wipe the pavement with your face.
>
lol...you and whos army...assembly line mothafuka!!
Christopher Adams
> piss and moan the way these people do. My failing is that I refuse,
> perhaps stupidly, to remain anonymous throughout the proceedings,
> because anonymity is for wimps and terrorists.
Oh, your real name is "trotsky" then, is it? Don't you have an icepick in your
skull?
--
Christopher Adams - SUTEKH Functions Officer 2003
When I awakened, I was not as I had been.
"A portfolio of erotic 'Buffy' fan-fiction does not a writer make."
- Neil, www.goats.com
rande...@rrogers.com
>
>
>rande...@rrogers.com wrote:
>
>> His concept of a "good" subwoofer is interesting, but likely not
>> very good in practice. In fact, it rather sounds like someone
>> putting a speaker driver into the cardboard box their refrigerator
>> came in.
>
>
>
>How bad is your hi-fi, Rich?
Hi-fi? I'm one of those people with home theatres that double
for music. I guess I'm out of luck in the hi-fi dept.
-Rich
trotsky
bod wrote:
> "trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
> news:3F63ABF4...@email.com...
>
>
>>Come and get me, anonymouse. I'll wipe the pavement with your face.
>>
>
>
> lol...you and whos army...assembly line mothafuka!!
Come on, bod--set up a meeting between me and "Bombsquad". We can have
a nice chat.
trotsky
Christopher Adams wrote:
> trotsky wrote:
>
>>piss and moan the way these people do. My failing is that I refuse,
>>perhaps stupidly, to remain anonymous throughout the proceedings,
>>because anonymity is for wimps and terrorists.
>
>
> Oh, your real name is "trotsky" then, is it? Don't you have an icepick in your
> skull?
Wow, I've never heard that one before.
trotsky
Okay, let me re-phrase the question: how bad is your home theater, Rich?
We can even make it more specific--you can tell me if you have a
powered subwoofer and I can tell you point by point how much better mine
is. Come on, this is your big chance not to be yellow.
Christopher Adams
>> Oh, your real name is "trotsky" then, is it? Don't you have an icepick
>> in your skull?
>
> Wow, I've never heard that one before.
Seriously: if you have a problem with "anonymice", why don't you post as Greg
Singh, instead of naming yourself after evil people?
trotsky
Christopher Adams wrote:
> trotsky wrote:
>
>>>Oh, your real name is "trotsky" then, is it? Don't you have an icepick
>>>in your skull?
>>
>>Wow, I've never heard that one before.
>
>
> Seriously: if you have a problem with "anonymice", why don't you post as Greg
> Singh, instead of naming yourself after evil people?
Wait, so you know my real name, and you're asking me about anonymity?
What planet do you come from?
Christopher Adams
> Wait, so you know my real name, and you're asking me about anonymity?
> What planet do you come from?
Yeah, Greg, the point isn't that your real name is *discoverable*. Hell, most
people who post using pseudonyms on their Usenet posts will not be too hard to
identify by name. My question is, if you are so offended by anonymous posters,
why do you, yourself, present a false face to the world of Usenet?
trotsky
Christopher Adams wrote:
> trotsky wrote:
>
>>Wait, so you know my real name, and you're asking me about anonymity?
>>What planet do you come from?
>
>
> Yeah, Greg, the point isn't that your real name is *discoverable*. Hell, most
> people who post using pseudonyms on their Usenet posts will not be too hard to
> identify by name.
Could you do me a favor, then, and look up "bod's" real name so I can
give him a phone call? If not, could you please apologize for not
having a clue?
Christopher Adams
I'm sorry; your facility at English in posting to alt.horror had given me the
mistaken impression that you understood it fluently. I apologise.
For your edification, the word "most" means "a majority, but not all". I hope
that helps you, and I'll keep your inexperience with the English language in
mind in future.
The Gore-met
>bod wrote:
>> "trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
>>>Come and get me, anonymouse. I'll wipe the pavement with your face.
>> lol...you and whos army...assembly line mothafuka!!
>Come on, bod--set up a meeting between me and "Bombsquad". We can have
>a nice chat.
I pulled you out of the bozo bin so I could enjoy the whole party, but
watching the flailings of such a bitter, ineffectual and lonely man is
really sad. You're far too wretched a human being to poke fun at, sort
of a corpulent Gollum. And judging by your pictures, I doubt you could
go two rounds without oxygen, so you might want to think about posting
threats on Usenet in case someone decides to take you up on it. So
back in the bin you go, along with this thread. In the meantime, pour
yourself a glass of milk, put your toes in the grass and reflect on
your pitiful business acumen.
--
"If you beat them they won't dance for you".
trotsky
Christopher Adams wrote:
> trotsky wrote:
>
>>Christopher Adams wrote:
>>
>>>trotsky wrote:
>>>
>>>>Wait, so you know my real name, and you're asking me about anonymity?
>>>>What planet do you come from?
>>>
>>>Yeah, Greg, the point isn't that your real name is *discoverable*.
>>>Hell, most people who post using pseudonyms on their Usenet posts will
>>>not be too hard to identify by name.
>>
>>Could you do me a favor, then, and look up "bod's" real name so I can
>>give him a phone call? If not, could you please apologize for not
>>having a clue?
>
>
> I'm sorry; your facility at English in posting to alt.horror had given me the
> mistaken impression that you understood it fluently. I apologise.
>
> For your edification, the word "most" means "a majority, but not all". I hope
> that helps you, and I'll keep your inexperience with the English language in
> mind in future.
I'm not interested in most people, Chris--just "Bombsquad" or "bod".
Perhaps you can amend the word to "none", since you really don't have a
goddamn shred of information to report, and are hence talking out of
your arse.
trotsky
The Gore-met wrote:
> trotsky <gms...@email.com> wrote:
>
>
>>bod wrote:
>
>
>>>"trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
>>
>
>
>>>>Come and get me, anonymouse. I'll wipe the pavement with your face.
>>>
>
>
>>>lol...you and whos army...assembly line mothafuka!!
>>
>
>>Come on, bod--set up a meeting between me and "Bombsquad". We can have
>>a nice chat.
>
>
> I pulled you out of the bozo bin so I could enjoy the whole party, but
> watching the flailings of such a bitter, ineffectual and lonely man is
> really sad. You're far too wretched a human being to poke fun at, sort
> of a corpulent Gollum. And judging by your pictures, I doubt you could
> go two rounds without oxygen,
Shall we have a wager? E-mail me your address.
so you might want to think about posting
> threats on Usenet in case someone decides to take you up on it. So
> back in the bin you go, along with this thread. In the meantime, pour
> yourself a glass of milk, put your toes in the grass and reflect on
> your pitiful business acumen.
I've forgotten--whose sockpuppet are you? Usenet, home of anonymous
pieces of crap that come crawling out of the wordwork like maggots. I
guess that's a fitting image for alt.horror, anyway.
MomInChi
that he lives about 15 minutes away from me. Anyone want me to take them on a
little tour of the suburbs?
bod
>
> Could you do me a favor, then, and look up "bod's" real name so I can
> give him a phone call? If not, could you please apologize for not
> having a clue?
>
what are you gonna do...sell me double glazing?
Kenneth Crudup
WareWolf <dus...@nospam.nc.rr.com> says:
>A guy whose address, location and phone # is now outed to all of USENET
>might consider being a little more careful about threatening people.
Aw, fuck off.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles, CA
Home: 3801 E. Pacific Coast Hwy #9, Long Beach, CA 90804-2014 (562) 961-7300
Work: 2052 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92606-4905 (949) 252-1111 X240
Sean O'Hara
>
> Sean O'Hara wrote:
> >
> >
> > Maybe if you stopped being an asshole this wouldn't happen.
>
> Do you have an actual problem with schizophrenia or do you just come off
> that way on Usenet? Perhaps you're such a basket case that you can't
> even remember what you posted two messages ago.
>
Just because I don't think someone should try to get you fired for
your behavior on Usenet, doesn't mean I don't think your worthy of
contempt.
rande...@rrogers.com
I'm not using a sub right now. My speakers go down to about 28hz but
a sub would help.
-Rich
trotsky
bod wrote:
> "trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
> news:3F646C80...@email.com...
>
>
>>Could you do me a favor, then, and look up "bod's" real name so I can
>>give him a phone call? If not, could you please apologize for not
>>having a clue?
>>
>
>
> what are you gonna do...sell me double glazing?
Why not e-mail me your name and address so we can find out?
trotsky
Kenneth Crudup wrote:
> In article <MPG.19cd570a7...@news-server.nc.rr.com>,
> WareWolf <dus...@nospam.nc.rr.com> says:
>
>
>>A guy whose address, location and phone # is now outed to all of USENET
>>might consider being a little more careful about threatening people.
>
>
> Aw, fuck off.
Agreed.
trotsky
Sean O'Hara wrote:
> In the Year of the Goat, the Great and Powerful trotsky declared...
>
>>Sean O'Hara wrote:
>>
>>>Aw, whozza matta Twotsky? Is evewyone being mean to you?
>>>
>>>Maybe if you stopped being an asshole this wouldn't happen.
>>
>>Do you have an actual problem with schizophrenia or do you just come off
>>that way on Usenet? Perhaps you're such a basket case that you can't
>>even remember what you posted two messages ago.
>>
>
> Just because I don't think someone should try to get you fired for
> your behavior on Usenet, doesn't mean I don't think your worthy of
> contempt.
I've never seen such a cavalcade of guys waiting to be bitch-slapped in
all my life. Nerds, even.
trotsky
Bombsquad wrote:
> OH NOES, TEH SINGH IS TEH MADDER AT ME!
>
> Whatever shall I do. As I said many, many a moon ago. If that fat bastard
> can find somebody to cut a wall out off his house, so the Air National Guard
> can airlift his fat ass around the Chicagoland area, I'd be shocked. He
> wants to meet me. I bet his fat, pudgy little fingers are shaking in fear.
> Eh, probably not. He had to wait a whole 5 minutes until feeding time, so he
> ate them.
Yep, smells like fear to me. Just e-mail your name and address,
Bomby--I swear I'll keep it confidential.
Sean O'Hara
>
> Sean O'Hara wrote:
> > In the Year of the Goat, the Great and Powerful trotsky declared...
> >
> >>
> > Harvey Pekar or Paul Giamatti?
>
> Toby, the self-proclaimed nerd. Did you not see the movie?
>
No I haven't. Forgive me, O wise one for not watching every single
movie out there.
> > Yes, Greggy-poo, I'm a nerd. You've found me out. I've read Beowulf
> > in the original Anglo-Saxon. I can write HTML. I can replace
> > hardware in my computer. I watch Star Trek. I read a book per week.
> > I can quote Monty Python skits verbatim. I'm sure everyone here
> > will be shocked -- shocked! -- to learn that a nerd is posting to
> > Usenet.
> >
> > But I'm a nerd with a social life, who goes to parties, who has
> > friends -- even real, honest-to-goodness female friends whom I
> > don't treat with contempt as though they're gormless halfwits
> > incapable of using the Internet. And I post to Usenet for the
> > challenge of a good debate and fun discussions, not because its
> > the be-all-end-all of my social life and the only way I can get
> > people to pay attention to me.
> >
> > Trotsky, you are a sad man. Instead of putting yourself forward as
> > pinata, why don't you go out for a walk, maybe take a trip to the
> > local bar, or maybe go down to the multiplex and see if you can
> > mack on the usherettes. Find something to do instead of being
> > acted upon and maybe people wouldn't treat you with utter
> > contempt.
>
> Sean, you clearly don't get out much, so I'm going to explain to you
> what is going on here. First, a very simple life lesson: it takes two
> to tango. Nobody on this forum is either fine or upstanding, nor are
> they interested in truth, justice or the American way.
I never said they were. We're talking about behavior, and most
of the people here, even the trolls apart from you, Rander and a
few others, act like properly socialized individuals. No one would
care if you were a fat slob who sells homemade sound-systems if
you acted that way as well, but instead you behave like a baby
screaming for attention, and that annoys and repulses people.
> To think they
> are innocent and I'm the "bad guy" makes you very naive and/or
> George W. Bush.
See, this attitude is precisely your problem -- you act like your
some poor boy put upon by a world that doesn't understand. Well
drop the martyr complex, 'cause it ain't the rest of the world
that's your problem -- it's you. Stop your damned whining about
others and do something about yourself.
<SNIP gossip about various posters>
Who cares if someone here used to snort coke, or played a silly joke
on you, or had sex more than you consider proper? What counts is
how they behave here and now. I wouldn't care if Dawn starred in
her own series of porn movies, while you worked for Habitat for
Humanity on your days off -- what counts is that Dawn engages
in cogent conversations while you're just an asshole.
WareWolf
> In article <MPG.19cd570a7...@news-server.nc.rr.com>,
> WareWolf <dus...@nospam.nc.rr.com> says:
>
> >A guy whose address, location and phone # is now outed to all of USENET
> >might consider being a little more careful about threatening people.
>
> Aw, fuck off.
>
> -Kenny
>
>
<chortle> Thanks, Kenny, didn't know you cared. But you're not
threatening people. Yet.
Dusty
--
This Week's Column: The God Squad: Let Us Roll
http://dusty.booksnbytes.com/columns/2003/2003_0907.html
trotsky
WareWolf wrote:
> In article <vm9bi8g...@corp.supernews.com>, ke...@panix.com says...
>
>>In article <MPG.19cd570a7...@news-server.nc.rr.com>,
>>WareWolf <dus...@nospam.nc.rr.com> says:
>>
>>
>>>A guy whose address, location and phone # is now outed to all of USENET
>>>might consider being a little more careful about threatening people.
>>
>>Aw, fuck off.
>>
>> -Kenny
>>
>>
>
>
> <chortle> Thanks, Kenny, didn't know you cared. But you're not
> threatening people. Yet.
Anonymice aren't people, "Dusty".
bod
> Yep, smells like fear to me. Just e-mail your name and address,
> Bomby--I swear I'll keep it confidential.
>
yup...we realy are both as fucking stupid as you are!!
Robert Lee
<bodster(nospam)@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> "trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
> news:3F64C19...@email.com...
>
> > Yep, smells like fear to me. Just e-mail your name and address,
> > Bomby--I swear I'll keep it confidential.
> >
>
> yup...we realy are both as fucking stupid as you are!!
Not to come off like a Nanny or anything, but there's really no point in
having a killfile if everybody else is going to feed the trolls that
populate it.
--Robert
--
Do not sit next to Dennis
bod
"Robert Lee" <cranch...@youknowwhattodo.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:cranchingwire-216...@news.west.earthlink.net...
i apologise robert...but i just cant help but torment the fucking mongie!!
tell you what...i will just plonk the fucker!!
Homer
<bodster(nospam)@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>"Robert Lee" <cranch...@youknowwhattodo.earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:cranchingwire-216...@news.west.earthlink.net...
>> In article <bk2nsb$osfd9$2...@ID-77616.news.uni-berlin.de>, "bod"
>> <bodster(nospam)@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > "trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
>> > news:3F64C19...@email.com...
>> >
>> > > Yep, smells like fear to me. Just e-mail your name and address,
>> > > Bomby--I swear I'll keep it confidential.
>> > >
>> >
>> > yup...we realy are both as fucking stupid as you are!!
>>
>> Not to come off like a Nanny or anything, but there's really no point in
>> having a killfile if everybody else is going to feed the trolls that
>> populate it.
>>
>> --Robert
>>
>> --
>> Do not sit next to Dennis
>
>i apologise robert...but i just cant help but torment the fucking mongie!!
>tell you what...i will just plonk the fucker!!
*sniff* That's so touching . . . *HONNNNKK*
I had to killfile a couple of people today who were arguing with the
Trots, just to clear out the list a little. They seemed like nice
enough folk, but they were clearly from crossposted groups anyway, so
it's not like they'd care whether or not I was reading their messages.
Of course, I could never killfile you, Bod. You're so damned loveable,
and, well, so very, very drunk. ::-)
--
Homer
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Dr Walpurgis
> Not to come off like a Nanny or anything, but there's really no point in
> having a killfile if everybody else is going to feed the trolls that
> populate it.
Until recently I made an exception for Twatsky. You may have noticed
that his limited repertoire of comebacks includes frequent recycling of
the yawn-inducing claim that "You're all so terrified of The Mighty
Singh that you killfile my awesome power!". For a while I therefore
derived a great deal of pleasure from kicking the shit out of the inept
little specimen every time his multiple chins dragged his slack jaw
open. Unfortunately, he never had anything new to offer in response so I
quickly got bored. I won't KF the sad old fucker, but now pretty much
just skip by his impotent foamings without remark.
--
"Yes, well, I mean, you know, look..." - Tony Blair giving evidence to
the Hutton Inquiry, 28 Aug 03
bod
"Homer" <home...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ojp9mv0cc09c7cg49...@4ax.com...
> Of course, I could never killfile you, Bod. You're so damned loveable,
> and, well, so very, very drunk. ::-)
homer..i love you so much i have just sprayed the back of my undies with
rusty piss!
WareWolf
It's actually my name, "trots"
Dusty
--
This Week's column: http://dusty.booksnbytes.com/columns/2003/2003_
0907.html
bod
"Dr Walpurgis" <drwal...@blueyonder.nul> wrote in message
news:C7WcnWuNAoQ...@giganews.com...
> Robert Lee wrote:
>
> > Not to come off like a Nanny or anything, but there's really no point in
> > having a killfile if everybody else is going to feed the trolls that
> > populate it.
>
> Until recently I made an exception for Twatsky. You may have noticed
> that his limited repertoire of comebacks includes frequent recycling of
> the yawn-inducing claim that "You're all so terrified of The Mighty
> Singh that you killfile my awesome power!". For a while I therefore
> derived a great deal of pleasure from kicking the shit out of the inept
> little specimen every time his multiple chins dragged his slack jaw
> open. Unfortunately, he never had anything new to offer in response so I
> quickly got bored. I won't KF the sad old fucker, but now pretty much
> just skip by his impotent foamings without remark.
he complained about racism in an earlier post...dont you think dickwads like
him cause racist remarks?
i mean the fucker just loads the gun for you and puts the barrel to his
head!!
WideScreenPig
writ thusly:
>You're far too wretched a human being to poke fun at, sort
>of a corpulent Gollum
GOAL!! GOAL!!!! GOAAAAAAAALLLLL!!!!!
--
WideScreenPig
Homer
<bodster(nospam)@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>"Homer" <home...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ojp9mv0cc09c7cg49...@4ax.com...
>
>> Of course, I could never killfile you, Bod. You're so damned loveable,
>> and, well, so very, very drunk. ::-)
>
>homer..i love you so much i have just sprayed the back of my undies with
>rusty piss!
There's almost a signature file there, but in six months it would be
hard to explain to the newbies.
Kenneth Crudup
WareWolf <dus...@nospam.nc.rr.com> says:
><chortle> Thanks, Kenny, didn't know you cared. But you're not
>threatening people. Yet.
Oh- um, hang on.
I'M GONNA GET YOU!!!!!11111!!!!
trotsky
bod wrote:
> "trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
> news:3F64C19...@email.com...
>
>
>>Yep, smells like fear to me. Just e-mail your name and address,
>>Bomby--I swear I'll keep it confidential.
>>
>
>
> yup...we realy are both as fucking stupid as you are!!
How fuking drunk are you this time, bod?
trotsky
WareWolf wrote:
> trotsky wrote in rec.arts.movies.current-films :
>
>>
>>WareWolf wrote:
>>
>>>In article <vm9bi8g...@corp.supernews.com>, ke...@panix.com says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <MPG.19cd570a7...@news-server.nc.rr.com>,
>>>>WareWolf <dus...@nospam.nc.rr.com> says:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>A guy whose address, location and phone # is now outed to all of USENET
>>>>>might consider being a little more careful about threatening people.
>>>>
>>>>Aw, fuck off.
>>>>
>>>> -Kenny
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>><chortle> Thanks, Kenny, didn't know you cared. But you're not
>>>threatening people. Yet.
>>
>>
>>Anonymice aren't people, "Dusty".
>>
>>
>
>
> It's actually my name, "trots"
I'm not sure what you mean, Dusty. Why don't you tell me about your
livelihood so I can give you some of the treatment you've condoned.
trotsky
Dr Walpurgis wrote:
> Robert Lee wrote:
>
>> Not to come off like a Nanny or anything, but there's really no point
>> in having a killfile if everybody else is going to feed the trolls
>> that populate it.
>
>
> Until recently I made an exception for Twatsky. You may have noticed
> that his limited repertoire of comebacks includes frequent recycling of
> the yawn-inducing claim that "You're all so terrified of The Mighty
> Singh that you killfile my awesome power!".
That's kind of a lie, isn't Dickpurgis? I used the words "arrested
development" a couple of times and you crawled back into whatever rat
hole you came out of. Oh, wait, you're British, so the truth is a
foreign concept to you.
WareWolf
>
>
> WareWolf wrote:
> > trotsky wrote in rec.arts.movies.current-films :
> >
> >>
> >>WareWolf wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article <vm9bi8g...@corp.supernews.com>, ke...@panix.com says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>In article <MPG.19cd570a7...@news-server.nc.rr.com>,
> >>>>WareWolf <dus...@nospam.nc.rr.com> says:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>A guy whose address, location and phone # is now outed to all of USENET
> >>>>>might consider being a little more careful about threatening people.
> >>>>
> >>>>Aw, fuck off.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Kenny
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>><chortle> Thanks, Kenny, didn't know you cared. But you're not
> >>>threatening people. Yet.
> >>
> >>
> >>Anonymice aren't people, "Dusty".
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > It's actually my name, "trots"
>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean, Dusty. >>
Sorry, I forgot for a moment that I was dealing with a fucking idiot.
I mean you can drop the quotation marks around my name as if it was a
pseudonym. It's my real name, or at least a nickname by which I'm daily
known to friends and family. Since you are neither, YOU may refer to me as
Mr. Rhoades.
As for my profession, Rich could figure it out, and use it in his own
irrelevant and pathetic attempts to change the subject.
Why can't you? Are you actually stupider than Rich? Jesus, that is SO SAD.
WareWolf
> In article <MPG.19ce9c83e...@news-server.nc.rr.com>,
> WareWolf <dus...@nospam.nc.rr.com> says:
>
> ><chortle> Thanks, Kenny, didn't know you cared. But you're not
> >threatening people. Yet.
>
> Oh- um, hang on.
>
> I'M GONNA GET YOU!!!!!11111!!!!
>
> -Kenny
>
>
Naaah, just not believable. No calls to the LAPD tonight. Keep trying.
Dusty
--
This Week's column: http://dusty.booksnbytes.com/columns/2003/2003_
0907.html
Sean O'Hara
to do it, right?
No one's buying it, Greg.
> Nerds, even.
>
You sell homemade electronics online. You're in no position to
deride people for being nerds.
trotsky
> trotsky wrote in rec.arts.movies.current-films :
>
> >
> >WareWolf wrote:
> >
> >>trotsky wrote in rec.arts.movies.current-films :
>
> >>>Anonymice aren't people, "Dusty".
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>It's actually my name, "trots"
> >
> >
> >I'm not sure what you mean, Dusty. >>
>
>
> Sorry, I forgot for a moment that I was dealing with a fucking idiot.
>
> I mean you can drop the quotation marks around my name as if it was a
> pseudonym. It's my real name, or at least a nickname by which I'm daily
> known to friends and family. Since you are neither, YOU may refer to
> me as
> Mr. Rhoades.
>
> As for my profession, Rich could figure it out, and use it in his own
> irrelevant and pathetic attempts to change the subject.
>
> Why can't you? Are you actually stupider than Rich? Jesus, that is SO
> SAD.
You're right, "Dusty", this is sad. I only posted two sentences in the
post you responded to, the second being your big chance to make a value
judgement. You couldn't handle it, and snipped it. Please grow a
backbone if you'd like to continue this discussion.
trotsky
> In the Year of the Goat, the Great and Powerful trotsky declared...
>
> >Sean O'Hara wrote:
> >
> >>In the Year of the Goat, the Great and Powerful trotsky declared...
> >>
> >>
> >>>Oh dear. You look like the nerdy guy from "American Splendor".
> >>>
> >>
> >>Harvey Pekar or Paul Giamatti?
> >
> >Toby, the self-proclaimed nerd. Did you not see the movie?
> >
>
> No I haven't. Forgive me, O wise one for not watching every single
> movie out there.
No problem. From the photos you clearly have a busy and important life.
>
>
>
> >>Yes, Greggy-poo, I'm a nerd. You've found me out. I've read Beowulf
> >>in the original Anglo-Saxon. I can write HTML. I can replace
> >>hardware in my computer. I watch Star Trek. I read a book per week.
> >>I can quote Monty Python skits verbatim. I'm sure everyone here
> >>will be shocked -- shocked! -- to learn that a nerd is posting to
> >>Usenet.
> >>
> >>But I'm a nerd with a social life, who goes to parties, who has
> >>friends -- even real, honest-to-goodness female friends whom I
> >>don't treat with contempt as though they're gormless halfwits
> >>incapable of using the Internet. And I post to Usenet for the
> >>challenge of a good debate and fun discussions, not because its
> >>the be-all-end-all of my social life and the only way I can get
> >>people to pay attention to me.
> >>
> >>Trotsky, you are a sad man. Instead of putting yourself forward as
> >>pinata, why don't you go out for a walk, maybe take a trip to the
> >>local bar, or maybe go down to the multiplex and see if you can
> >>mack on the usherettes. Find something to do instead of being
> >>acted upon and maybe people wouldn't treat you with utter
> >>contempt.
> >
> >Sean, you clearly don't get out much, so I'm going to explain to you
> >what is going on here. First, a very simple life lesson: it takes two
> >to tango. Nobody on this forum is either fine or upstanding, nor are
> >they interested in truth, justice or the American way.
>
>
> I never said they were.
You didn't say it, you implied it by saying all the blame for the bad
behavior in exchanges with me is because of me. Now you're just wriggling.
> We're talking about behavior, and most
> of the people here, even the trolls apart from you, Rander and a
> few others, act like properly socialized individuals. No one would
> care if you were a fat slob who sells homemade sound-systems if
> you acted that way as well, but instead you behave like a baby
> screaming for attention, and that annoys and repulses people.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, nerdy. I didn't start this
thread. Ian, obsessively, tried to make fun of me and and my
livelihood, and a bunch of others retalitated. As such, it's my
prerogative to now use them for target practice. You simply refuse to
get the story straight and are behaving in a very immature fashion.
>
>
>
> >To think they
> >are innocent and I'm the "bad guy" makes you very naive and/or
> >George W. Bush.
>
>
> See, this attitude is precisely your problem -- you act like your
> some poor boy put upon by a world that doesn't understand. Well
> drop the martyr complex, 'cause it ain't the rest of the world
> that's your problem -- it's you. Stop your damned whining about
> others and do something about yourself.
Sean, because you are trying desperately to be a dick, you simply can't
address why this thread even exists. Why can't you handle this aspect
of the discussion, Sean? Please note: I didn't start this thread, and,
with the exception of movie reviewers, which is on topic, I don't attack
people's livelihood's. You simply don't have the guts to label who the
real assholes are here. I hate to keep bringing up the concept of
cowardice, but that's the only way to describe the extremely weak
behavior of many on Usenet. Yourself included, Sean.
>
> Who cares if someone here used to snort coke, or played a silly joke
> on you, or had sex more than you consider proper?
I don't know, who cares if I make speakers for a living and have a
picture of myself on my website. Can you be any more of a hypocrite here?
> What counts is
> how they behave here and now.
Which is deplorable. I'm just filling in a little back story.
> I wouldn't care if Dawn starred in
> her own series of porn movies, while you worked for Habitat for
> Humanity on your days off -- what counts is that Dawn engages
> in cogent conversations while you're just an asshole.
You are unbelievably full of shit, Sean. I don't expect you to have the
guts to address your own hypocrisy here.
trotsky
> In the Year of the Goat, the Great and Powerful trotsky declared...
>
> >Sean O'Hara wrote:
> >
> >>Just because I don't think someone should try to get you fired for
> >>your behavior on Usenet, doesn't mean I don't think your worthy of
> >>contempt.
> >
> >I've never seen such a cavalcade of guys waiting to be bitch-slapped in
> >all my life.
> >
>
> Yes, and if we'd just give you our addresses, you'd wallow out here
> to do it, right?
>
> No one's buying it, Greg.
Those limey cocksuckers (anybody get the movie reference?) sure seem
afraid, don't they? You have the mind of a child, Sean: there's a whole
lot of bad guys here, not just me.
WareWolf
gms...@email.com says...
>
> You're right, "Dusty", this is sad. I only posted two sentences in the
> post you responded to, the second being your big chance to make a value
> judgement. You couldn't handle it, and snipped it.
"Why don't you tell me about your livelihood so I can give you some of
the treatment you've condoned" is not a "chance to make a value
judgment." It's another one of your laughable attempts at an ominous
threat.
> Please grow a
> backbone if you'd like to continue this discussion.
Discussion!!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA! This isn't a discussion, trots. It's you
sitting behind your keyboard making thinly veiled threats to other
posters that if you just knew where they were or what they did for a
living, youl'd fix them good, yessirree. Or in the case of the British
poster, you'd get your sister to do it. HAHAHAHAAAAAA!
The combination of incoherence and impotence is hilarious. But please,
keep going. You USENET tough guys crack me up.
Dusty
--
This Week's Column: Requiescat in Pace, That's All She Wrote
http://dusty.booksnbytes.com/columns/2003/2003_0914.html
WareWolf
gms...@email.com says...
> I didn't start this
> thread. Ian, obsessively, tried to make fun of me and and my
> livelihood, and a bunch of others retalitated.
>
You're just reaping what you've sown, trots. You've made yourself so
thoroughly unlikeable that people just can't wait to give you the virtual
kicking around you so richly deserve.
trotsky
> In article <_Oh9b.4546$BS5....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> gms...@email.com says...
>
>
> >You're right, "Dusty", this is sad. I only posted two sentences in the
> >post you responded to, the second being your big chance to make a value
> >judgement. You couldn't handle it, and snipped it.
>
>
> "Why don't you tell me about your livelihood so I can give you some of
> the treatment you've condoned" is not a "chance to make a value
> judgment." It's another one of your laughable attempts at an ominous
> threat.
It is? If I did something like that it would make me a total hypocrite,
like you. Therefore there must've been another motivation for that
statement, right? You are being stupid and SO SAD here, "Dusty".
>
>
>
> > Please grow a
> >backbone if you'd like to continue this discussion.
>
>
>
> Discussion!!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA! This isn't a discussion, trots. It's
> you
> sitting behind your keyboard making thinly veiled threats to other
> posters that if you just knew where they were or what they did for a
> living, youl'd fix them good, yessirree. Or in the case of the British
> poster, you'd get your sister to do it. HAHAHAHAAAAAA!
>
> The combination of incoherence and impotence is hilarious. But please,
> keep going. You USENET tough guys crack me up.
I see. So, like Sean, you are suffering from arrested development too,
and are unable to comment on why this thread even exists.
trotsky
> In article ,
> gms...@email.com says...
>
> > I didn't start this
> >thread. Ian, obsessively, tried to make fun of me and and my
> >livelihood, and a bunch of others retalitated.
> >
>
>
> You're just reaping what you've sown, trots.
I see. So everything that happens here is permissible. In a way, you
are calling Ian a wimp for not actually coming into my home and sticking
a knife in my back. You and I both know he wants to.
> You've made yourself so
> thoroughly unlikeable that people just can't wait to give you the virtual
> kicking around you so richly deserve.
That's fine, "Dusty". You go with that Peter Pan syndrome if you need
it as a defense mechanism to get you through life. Obviously, I'm not
the one with the problem.
McNeeley... Cheaper, faster, better...
wrote:
>He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
>styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
>from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
>Glory that is Singh:
I understand the point. He's making the speakers. But the photo just
doesn't convey the point. It hints at making something, but after
being distracted by Trotsky the Hut, it's hard to make out what it is.
Or care.
I find it interesting that the products themselves seem to be nicely
photographed, but the "in production" photo more prominently features
a gas can, a rake, a cooler, a tarp, and a folding lawn chair.
All these objects, by the way, were on the list of things his mommy
told him to get picked up before he started tinkering with his speaker
project.
Cheers,
Todd "Oh well... At least he's trying" McNeeley
McNeeley... Cheaper, faster, better...
>
>
>Ian McDowell wrote:
>> "McNeeley... Cheaper, faster, better..." <nos...@myserver.gov> wrote
>>
>>
>>>I was going to post a point by point reply, but why? You are the most
>>>"sanctimonious dickhead" of them all. You sit at home and wallow in
>>>self pity. (You know why. I don't need to embarrass you.) Then after
>>>working up enough anger at God for having forsaken you, you lash out
>>>in a trollish manner against your obvious betters.
>>>
>>>I'm sorry your life sucks. It isn't my fault, but I feel bad for you
>>>all the same. However, even though I have everything you don't
>>>(talent, wit, friends) you do have something that I don't. Time.
>>
>>
>> Greg seems to be putting it to industrious use in these photos from
>> his new website. He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
>> styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
>> from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
>> Glory that is Singh:
>>
>> http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/about_us.html
>>
>> http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/contact_us.html
>>
>> Despite the first-person-plural on the "Contact Us" page, Jupiter
>> Audio seems to be a one-man operation. I think the name quite
>> appropriate. Whether due to Greg's bellicosity or because he's one of
>> the larger bodies in this solar system, I'll leave up to you. His
>> entire website is worth reading, particularly for anyone whose grammar
>> or spelling he's criticized.
>
>
>Wow, Ian, you're quite obsessed. Clearly Todd, in the interest of
>fairness, will have to say something. But please, tell us (and pardon
>the use of "us"), what do you do for a living? You're not afraid of a
>little quid pro quo, are you? Or is that only available "in the dojo?"
Is there anyone here who doesn't know what Ian does for a living?
Anyone at all?
Cheers,
Todd " <crickets> " McNeeley
McNeeley... Cheaper, faster, better...
<mhacde...@spammity-spammity-spam.yahoo.com> wrote:
>trotsky wrote:
>> Wait, so you know my real name, and you're asking me about anonymity?
>> What planet do you come from?
>
>Yeah, Greg, the point isn't that your real name is *discoverable*. Hell, most
>people who post using pseudonyms on their Usenet posts will not be too hard to
>identify by name. My question is, if you are so offended by anonymous posters,
>why do you, yourself, present a false face to the world of Usenet?
Did you see the pictures...?
He doesn't present any face at all. He just, as usual, shows us his
ass.
Cheers,
Todd "if ever there was a guy that should post anonymously" McNeeley
McNeeley... Cheaper, faster, better...
<darkerthenightth...@myrealbox.com> wrote:
>In the Year of the Goat, the Great and Powerful trotsky declared...
>>
>> > lol...ficking classic, that page is still up there...as far as i can tell
>> > with his attitude and putting the image of him together...well it just
>> > figures folks!!
>> > i love getting idiots like this sacked from their jobs as a hobby!!
>>
>> Can you explain that last bit, bod? My sister lives in London and she
>> may just pop by to show you some creative things with a screwdriver.
>>
>Aw, whozza matta Twotsky? Is evewyone being mean to you?
>
>Maybe if you stopped being an asshole this wouldn't happen.
See? This is what I've been saying...
But Trots thinks he has to stick to his "confrontational style"
instead of being human. He can't let anyone get the upper hand (which
is funny, as everyone has always had the upper hand) on him.
Cheers,
Todd "Or whatever that bullshit he prattled off to me was" McNeeley
McNeeley... Cheaper, faster, better...
wrote:
>In article <3F63885C...@email.com>, gms...@email.com says...
>>
>>
>> bod wrote:
>> > "Ian McDowell" <mcdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:6a88873e.03091...@posting.google.com...
>> >
>> >>Dawn Taylor <dawn...@pacifier.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> > news:<0ni6mv80to4grupi0...@4ax.com>...
>> >
>> >>>On 13 Sep 2003 07:30:22 -0700, mcdol...@hotmail.com (Ian McDowell)
>> >>>announced in front of God and everybody:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>Greg seems to be putting it to industrious use in these photos from
>> >>>>his new website. He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
>> >>>>styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
>> >>>
>> >>>>from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
>> >>>
>> >>>>Glory that is Singh:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/about_us.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/contact_us.html
>> >>>
>> >>>Seems he yanked it down mighty quick -- I keep getting "this page
>> >>>unavailable" messages. Apparently he's shy.
>> >>
>> >>If he yanked it (the page, I mean), it's back up now, as clicking on
>> >>the link upstream still loads it fine in my browser. Just in case,
>> >>though, I saved the incriminating jpegs for future reference.
>> >
>> >
>> > lol...ficking classic, that page is still up there...as far as i can tell
>> > with his attitude and putting the image of him together...well it just
>> > figures folks!!
>> > i love getting idiots like this sacked from their jobs as a hobby!!
>>
>>
>> Can you explain that last bit, bod? My sister lives in London and she
>> may just pop by to show you some creative things with a screwdriver.
>>
>>
>
>A guy whose address, location and phone # is now outed to all of USENET
>might consider being a little more careful about threatening people.
Is that a threat?
Cheers,
Todd "'cause I hope its a threat" McNeeley
McNeeley... Cheaper, faster, better...
wrote:
>> Please grow a
>> backbone if you'd like to continue this discussion.
>
>
>Discussion!!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA! This isn't a discussion, trots. It's you
>sitting behind your keyboard making thinly veiled threats to other
>posters that if you just knew where they were or what they did for a
>living, youl'd fix them good, yessirree.
Obviously, it's not a discussion. It's a troll. Trots is the best
troll ever, but there is a question... why? Doesn't he ever get bored
of being insulted by people far wittier than he is? Doesn't he ever
get tired of posting the same tired bullshit? Doesn't he know that
bullies just aren't that intimidating on the Internet? Just like fat
slobs who can't hold a job at Speaker Shack and live with their
mothers aren't intimidating in real life.
Cheers,
Todd "C'mon trots. Insult me...
We all play you like a fiddle, bitch" McNeeley
McNeeley... Cheaper, faster, better...
>
>
>Ian McDowell wrote:
>> Dawn Taylor <dawn...@pacifier.com> wrote in message news:<0ni6mv80to4grupi0...@4ax.com>...
>>
>>>On 13 Sep 2003 07:30:22 -0700, mcdol...@hotmail.com (Ian McDowell)
>>>announced in front of God and everybody:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Greg seems to be putting it to industrious use in these photos from
>>>>his new website. He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
>>>>styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
>>>
>>>>from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
>>>
>>>>Glory that is Singh:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/about_us.html
>>>>
>>>>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/contact_us.html
>>>
>>>Seems he yanked it down mighty quick -- I keep getting "this page
>>>unavailable" messages. Apparently he's shy.
>>
>>
>> If he yanked it (the page, I mean), it's back up now, as clicking on
>> the link upstream still loads it fine in my browser. Just in case,
>> though, I saved the incriminating jpegs for future reference.
>
>
>
>I can send you pictures of my dick if it will help get you through the
>night.
So you did buy that zoom lens you were talking about?
Cheers,
Todd "and you can enlarge the image with Photoshop" McNeeley
McNeeley... Cheaper, faster, better...
>WareWolf wrote:
>
>> In article ,
>> gms...@email.com says...
>>
>> > I didn't start this
>> >thread. Ian, obsessively, tried to make fun of me and and my
>> >livelihood, and a bunch of others retalitated.
>> >
>>
>>
>> You're just reaping what you've sown, trots.
>
>
>
>I see. So everything that happens here is permissible. In a way, you
>are calling Ian a wimp for not actually coming into my home and sticking
>a knife in my back. You and I both know he wants to.
You know, you could try going downtown and running at a federal
building with fake explosives strapped on... It would be more
effective. We all think jabbing at you verbally is fun, but actually
going out and doing you real physical harm? No, your "suicide by
Usenet" plan is actually pretty lame.
>> You've made yourself so
>> thoroughly unlikeable that people just can't wait to give you the virtual
>> kicking around you so richly deserve.
>
>That's fine, "Dusty". You go with that Peter Pan syndrome if you need
>it as a defense mechanism to get you through life. Obviously, I'm not
>the one with the problem.
Obvious to you, at least.
Cheers,
Todd "or just try pills, because they're painless" McNeeley
Giftzwerg
nos...@myserver.gov says...
> >He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
> >styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
> >from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
> >Glory that is Singh:
>
> I understand the point. He's making the speakers. But the photo just
> doesn't convey the point. It hints at making something, but after
> being distracted by Trotsky the Hut, it's hard to make out what it is.
> Or care.
<laughter>
"Shoggoth" ... "Trotsky the Hut" ...
Isn't it fascinating how the same simpering PC fuckwits who expend so
much hot air squalling 'n' squawking about "bigotry," and "prejudice,"
and this-or-that "ism" are always the first to seize on some wholly
irrelevant aspect of someone's physical characteristics and start
dishing out the ol' ad hominem?
Sure. Trotsky appears to be a fat bastard. If he happened to be black
I'm sure you fucking hypocrites would cheerfully be calling him
"nigger." Oh, not publicly, to be sure - but it's certainly
illuminating to contrast your actual commitment to non-judgementalism
with your pathological screeching about "bigots."
--
Giftzwerg
***
"[O]ur first task is that we must try to grasp what the
concept of the Enemy really means. The Enemy is someone
who is willing to die in order to kill you. And while it
is true that the Enemy always hates us for a reason -- it
is his reason, and not ours."
- Lee Harris
trotsky
Should I call your employer and see how you're doing, "Tod"?
trotsky
>
>
>
> Is there anyone here who doesn't know what Ian does for a living?
> Anyone at all?
I just assumed he was the McDonald's of male prostitutes.
trotsky
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 11:05:38 GMT, "Christopher Adams"
> wrote:
>
>
> >trotsky wrote:
> >
> >>Wait, so you know my real name, and you're asking me about anonymity?
> >>What planet do you come from?
> >
> >Yeah, Greg, the point isn't that your real name is *discoverable*.
> Hell, most
> >people who post using pseudonyms on their Usenet posts will not be
> too hard to
> >identify by name. My question is, if you are so offended by anonymous
> posters,
> >why do you, yourself, present a false face to the world of Usenet?
>
>
> Did you see the pictures...?
>
It's like a train wreck convention. For once in your life, "Tod", you
get to play the straight man.
trotsky
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 17:43:38 -0400, Sean O'Hara
Maybe when you grow up, "Tod", you'll learn that it takes two to tango.
I'm not betting on it, though.
trotsky
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 03:19:23 GMT, WareWolf
> wrote:
>
>
> >In article <3F63885C...@email.com>, gms...@email.com says...
> >
> >>
> >>bod wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Ian McDowell" wrote in message
> >>>news:6a88873e.03091...@posting.google.com...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Dawn Taylor wrote in message
If typed words can form a limp dick, "Tod" just perfected it.
trotsky
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:14:52 GMT, WareWolf
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Please grow a
> >>backbone if you'd like to continue this discussion.
> >
> >
> >Discussion!!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA! This isn't a discussion, trots. It's
> you
> >sitting behind your keyboard making thinly veiled threats to other
> >posters that if you just knew where they were or what they did for a
> >living, youl'd fix them good, yessirree.
>
>
> Obviously, it's not a discussion. It's a troll. Trots is the best
> troll ever, but there is a question... why? Doesn't he ever get bored
> of being insulted by people far wittier than he is? Doesn't he ever
> get tired of posting the same tired bullshit? Doesn't he know that
> bullies just aren't that intimidating on the Internet? Just like fat
> slobs who can't hold a job at Speaker Shack and live with their
> mothers aren't intimidating in real life.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Todd "C'mon trots. Insult me...
>
Todd, why do you persist in this manner? You've already proven you
can't last five minutes in a discussion with me. All you got is
limp-wristed prissy little comments. There's no wit there. Nothing
masculine either. You've just copped out in a different manner than
Ian, is all. You're just as obsessed.
trotsky
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:11:01 GMT, trotsky wrote:
>
>
> >
> >Ian McDowell wrote:
> >
> >>Dawn Taylor wrote in message
> news:<0ni6mv80to4grupi0...@4ax.com>...
> >>
> >>
> >>>On 13 Sep 2003 07:30:22 -0700, mcdol...@hotmail.com (Ian McDowell)
> >>>announced in front of God and everybody:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Greg seems to be putting it to industrious use in these photos from
> >>>>his new website. He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
> >>>>styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
> >>>
> >>>>from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Glory that is Singh:
> >>>>
> >>>>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/about_us.html
> >>>>
> >>>>http://www.jupiter-audio.com/pages/contact_us.html
> >>>
> >>>Seems he yanked it down mighty quick -- I keep getting "this page
> >>>unavailable" messages. Apparently he's shy.
> >>
> >>
> >>If he yanked it (the page, I mean), it's back up now, as clicking on
> >>the link upstream still loads it fine in my browser. Just in case,
> >>though, I saved the incriminating jpegs for future reference.
> >
> >
> >
> >I can send you pictures of my dick if it will help get you through the
> >night.
>
>
> So you did buy that zoom lens you were talking about?
Wow, there's that rapier like high school caliber wit you're talking
about! Tell the truth--you bore yourself, right?
trotsky
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:40:33 GMT, trotsky wrote:
>
>
> >WareWolf wrote:
> >
> >
> >>In article ,
> >>gms...@email.com says...
> >>
> >>
> >>>I didn't start this
> >>>thread. Ian, obsessively, tried to make fun of me and and my
> >>>livelihood, and a bunch of others retalitated.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>You're just reaping what you've sown, trots.
> >
> >
> >
> >I see. So everything that happens here is permissible. In a way, you
> >are calling Ian a wimp for not actually coming into my home and sticking
> >a knife in my back. You and I both know he wants to.
>
>
> You know, you could try going downtown and running at a federal
> building with fake explosives strapped on...
I didn't start this thread. Quit realizing your life's hope of being a
piece of shit, please.
> It would be more
> effective. We all think jabbing at you verbally is fun, but actually
> going out and doing you real physical harm? No, your "suicide by
> Usenet" plan is actually pretty lame.
Todd, I've got three entire newsgroups at bay currently. Most of them
are anonymous assholes that can't even confront me directly. Others are
limp wristed like yourself. Others are obsessed nutcases like Ian.
(You're getting there, btw.) False declarations of victory from limp
wristed clowns don't carry a lot of weight with me, Todd. Now, if you
want to do some quid pro quo and post your picture and tell us your job
details so I can have the option of rippint you ten new assholes, that's
a different story. But you can't, because you're lame. Every time *I*
post the truth about something like this losers like you get more
inflamed. I can't help it, I'm just honest. And you're a coward and a
liar.
> >> You've made yourself so
> >>thoroughly unlikeable that people just can't wait to give you the
> virtual
> >>kicking around you so richly deserve.
> >
> >That's fine, "Dusty". You go with that Peter Pan syndrome if you need
> >it as a defense mechanism to get you through life. Obviously, I'm not
> >the one with the problem.
>
>
> Obvious to you, at least.
>
Cheers,
Todd "or just try pills, because they're painless" McNeeley
I don't doubt for a second that you've given it a lot of thought.
trotsky
> In article ,
> nos...@myserver.gov says...
>
>
> >>He's the shoggoth in the grey t-shirt with his hair
> >>styled in a pompadour. With characteristic modesty, he's turned away
> >
> >>from the camera in both shots, sparing us a full-frontal view of the
> >
> >>Glory that is Singh:
> >
> >I understand the point. He's making the speakers. But the photo just
> >doesn't convey the point. It hints at making something, but after
> >being distracted by Trotsky the Hut, it's hard to make out what it is.
> >Or care.
>
>
>
>
> "Shoggoth" ... "Trotsky the Hut" ...
>
> Isn't it fascinating how the same simpering PC fuckwits who expend so
> much hot air squalling 'n' squawking about "bigotry," and "prejudice,"
> and this-or-that "ism" are always the first to seize on some wholly
> irrelevant aspect of someone's physical characteristics and start
> dishing out the ol' ad hominem?
>
> Sure. Trotsky appears to be a fat bastard. If he happened to be black
> I'm sure you fucking hypocrites would cheerfully be calling him
> "nigger." Oh, not publicly, to be sure - but it's certainly
> illuminating to contrast your actual commitment to non-judgementalism
> with your pathological screeching about "bigots."
That about sums it up. Except that I was born legitmately.
WareWolf
> Todd, I've got three entire newsgroups at bay currently.
>
HAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!
This may be the funniest thing you've said yet, trots. Please, stop, I'm
dyin' here....
Dusty
--
This Week's column: Requiescat in Pace, That's All She Wrote
http://dusty.booksnbytes.com/columns/2003/2003_0914.html