Legal action against fanatics for NEWSGROUP defamation <was> Re: Some examples of the fanaticism, delusions, and errors of PSEUDO-SKEPTIC-FANATICS (PSF)
DanKettler
The portion of this post that concerns
"Legal Action" is below the asterisks...
******************************************************
------------------------------------------------------
Jason Mathews wrote:
> DanKettler <MAILVIAWEBSITE@no_spamKETTLERENTERPRISES.COM>
> > DK: I've heard that one before. You write nothing that
> > shows I'm an "idiot," you only continue to repeat
> > the allegation.
DK: The other PSF and trolls repeat your idiocy, like
parrots, by reposting your allegations.
JM: > Thank you, of course, for proving my point.
DK: Thank you, of course, for proving _my_ points.
DK: You, again, prove _you_ are an idiot.
DK: You again, prove, you are a coward.
DK: You, yet again, prove you _cannot_ write
anything that shows _real_ evidence of
my alleged idiocy.
DK: You could tell us _which_ point you
were referring to above, so that then the
readers would not be so "bewildered"
by your idiotic, and vague, writing.
DK: If an intelligent person reads the _entire_
post you are supposed to be "replying" to, they
will see you are not only an idiot, but a coward
as well for snipping it, and not attempting to
rebut it.
I've included the _entire_ post in this one.
**********************************************************
DK: PSF, generally, are idiots. Some have shown themselves
to be idiots because they are the cause of legal action
commencing against them for their idiotic, and defamatory,
writing on USENET for at least a decade...
http://www.psicounsel.com/discsens.html
Click at " complaint " near the top of the page
> <snip>
> > DK: Six errors from the first 6 points you made. I
> > could go on, but why waste time?
JM: > Handwaving doesn't refute anything.
DK: You are the one waving your hands, and snipping
the facts and clear logic I presented.
DK: 6 proven errors from the first 6 points you
made gives me the right to not waste time on
the remainder of your nonsense.
JM: It certainly doesn't detract from your idiocy. Don't
you see a pattern here?
DK: I see a pattern, for sure. You are
seriously deluded and need professional
help.
> --
> Desktop Mercenary |First Prophet, Paranoid Network Intruder Ministry
> xi...@swbell.net | http://candleinthedark.org
> | http://deskmerc.com
> AKA Mind Control Officer #171, Rabid Jo-Boy, SKEP-TI-CULTIST
> Usenet Hacker, AntiAstroClone, writer of text/plain ISO-8859-1
> news viruses, SICK LYING FOOL of USENET and VILE CREEPY OBSESSED ILK.
____________________________________________
WITH SOME NOTED MODIFICATIONS, (see
brackets [] ) BELOW IS THE COMPLETE
POST AVOIDED BY THE DELUDED COWARD,
JM:
____________________________________________
JM: > > [you] hat[e]... those who disagree with you.
DK: I don't hate anyone. I expose those who are
PSEUDO-SKEPTIC-FANATICS (PSF) and behave according
to a set pattern on USENET.
DK: It has nothing to do with "disagree... [ment]" with my views.
DK: Error number one. We are counting.
DK: Exactly what I have written about PSEUDO-SKEPTIC-FANATICS
(PSF) with... [evidence] that I've shown no hatred, and
that it has nothing to do with disagreement with my views,
is in linked pages from here...
http://www.psicounsel.com/news/index.html
<snip>
> > ...I'm just going to tell you that you are an idiot.
DK: I've heard that one before. You write nothing that
shows I'm an "idiot," you only continue to repeat
the allegation.
DK: On the other hand, when I use the word "idiot," I
show how certain PSF _are_ idiots.
DK: The reader may do a keyword search with GOOGLE,
find " DanKettler" as author, and search for
the many examples of _real_ idiocy. I have
given _real_ examples.
[DK: Use the word "idiot" in the keyword search]
The name "DanKettler" has been impersonated, so be
aware that others post as if they were me. See
this page for information...
http://www.psicounsel.com/blackmail.html
DK: GOOGLE:
http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
<snip>
JM: > > You do idiotic things. You speak idiocy. I
> > cannot think of a single post this year that
> > you have written that did not consist of
> > pure idiocy.
DK: The intelligent reader can ascertain which posts are mine
by examining GOOGLE archives and filtering out the
impersonations. If they are intelligent and
unbiased, they will not see "idiocy" in my writing.
DK: Having noted that you, in your delusions, saw "pure
idiocy" in _every_ post for... [a part of a] _year_,
they will see, quite clearly, that you are, indeed,
sick in the head like most PSEUDO-SKEPTIC-FANATICS
(PSF) posting to USENET.
JM: > > You cannot format a post without leaving the
JM: > > reader bewildered by your bizarre formatting.
DK: I'm formatting that way now. Intelligent people
are not "bewildered." Perhaps you are, but you're
not normal.
JM: > > You are an idiot for making pointless acronyms.
DK: The intelligent reader can ascertain if
this is idiotic or pointless...
DK: http://www.psicounsel.com/acronym.html
DK: Note, I wrote "intelligent."
DK: Skeptics can be intelligent.
DK: Paranormalists can be intelligent.
DK: Since these newsgroups are overrun with postings
from fanatics, I do not consider [the opinion of]
a majority posting to be of any importance.
DK: Error number 2, and still counting. There's nothing
in my acronyms that are "idiotic."
JM: The construction of acronyms belongs to the
government, large corporations and any
computer standards group. You are none
of these.
DK: The construction of acronyms belongs to anyone wanting to
make acronyms. Anyone who finds value in them can use
them. On USENET, a number of people have used "PSF."
[DK: In fact, if you look at the "acronym" page
referenced above, you will see a number of
acronyms placed by others, in regular use
on USENET, that are not from "large
corporations" or "government."]
[DK: FUBAR is one, ROFL is another]
DK: Error number 3, and still counting.
JM: > > You are an idiot for using excessive commas...
DK: I have, from time to time, used excessive commas.
[DK: This occurs, usually, when I do
not take time to proofread.]
DK: To call an [occasional] error in punctuation
"idiotic," is itself idiotic.
DK: To say a person just uses too many commas from time
to time would be accurate.
DK: Error 4, and still counting.
JM: > > You are an idiot for creating web pages full
JM: > > of nonsense and Kettlerzied spin/hate.
DK: The particular pages you seem to be referring to
contain no [expressions of] hat[red]. They...
[contain] _some_ opinion, and many... [_documented_]
facts. There is no "spin," in my opinion.
DK: Error 5, and still counting.
DK: The intelligent and unbiased reader may look at...
http://www.psicounsel.com/news/index.html
DK: Looking at the links, they can decide if I'm correct.
JM: > > You are an idiot for avoiding real comments on
JM: > > the paranormal merely because they are posed by
JM: > > skeptics.
DK: I have copies of "real comments" from skeptics
DK: on my web pages. See links from...
http://www.psicounsel.com/scistudy.html
[DK: Placing "real comments" from skeptics on
my web pages hardly qualifies as "avoiding"
them.]
DK: I have copies of debates I've had, [on Usenet,]
with "skeptics," for one example, at...
DK: http://www.psicounsel.com/randiuse03.html#deb
DK: Do a GOOGLE KEYWORD search, and look up
" refute the evidence " in my posts.
DK: Error number 6, and still counting.
DK: Six errors from the first 6 points you made. I
could go on, but why waste time?
<snip>
--
Spàmster
DanKettler wrote:
> The portion of this post that
Flush.
Dowap
DanKettler <MAILVIAWEBSITE@no_spamKETTLERENTERPRISES.COM> wrote:
Why is it that when I read DK I always get the image of "sonny" running
around saying "I'm koo koo for Cocoa-Pufs "?
--
I am Zathras. Zathras got here by being Zathras. Zathras wants nothing, so
Zathras gets nothing. That is life.
Zathras, from Babylon 5, episode #317, "War Without End, part 2"
jimboATpetitmorte.n3t
http://www.petitmorte.net
mhm30x27
Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)
<MAILVIAWEBSITE@no_spamKETTLERENTERPRISES.COM> wrote in
alt.fan.art-bell:
>DK: Thank you, of course, for proving _my_ points.
You never had a point, except on the top of your head, which, I
suspect, explains the whole "panty-head" episode.
--
V.G.
"I have not be me idiot you are still BE idiot! hahhahhahahahah!"
Theo <byj...@ch.inter.net> in alt.fan.art-bell
(This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM)
Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.