Dean Radin
Institute of Noetic Sciences
Based upon an analysis of 3 months of GCP data, I conclude that a statistical anomaly occurred that was associated with the date,
time and general location of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. There is also evidence that the anomaly began to appear a
few hours before the widely visible events unfolded.
Data analysis procedure
download daily raw datafile for June 16 through September 20, 2001
calculate daily empirical mean and sd per egg
exclude any raw egg values less than or equal to 50 or more than or equal to 150, and eggs with daily empirical means > 103 or < 97,
or sd > 6 or sd < 8 (these thresholds are used as indicators that the eggs malfunctioned; well over 99% of the egg data were usable)
use resulting mean & sd to calculate a t-score (199df) per egg, per day
t (199df) is approximately equal to z, calculate z-squared per egg
sum up all z-squares across eggs, per day, keeping track of the number of eggs
create 5-minute consolidations of the per-second data, as sums of z-squares
analyze data using 6 hour sliding window
calculate z score equivalent for the resulting chi-squares & df
calculate odds associated with the z scores
plot results
Figure 1. z scores of 5-minute summaries, across all eggs, June 16 - September 20, 2001
Figure 2. Histogram of observed and expected z scores in Figure 1, illustrating that overall the eggs are well-behaved. The
theoretical mean for z scores = 0; the observed mean is z = -0.0008. The theoretical standard deviation is 1, the observed sd =
0.9977. The Stouffer Z for the observed mean shift is z = -0.130.
Figure 3. z scores associated with 6-hour sliding window applied to z scores in Figure 1.
Figure 4. One tailed odds against chance for z scores in Figure 3. The large peak is September 11, 9:30 AM.
Figure 5. Subset of z scores from Figure 3, for September 11, 2001. The probability of dropping 6.5 standard deviations in a period
of 8 hours or less, determined by randomized permutation analysis applied to data from June 15 to Sept 18, is p = 0.002.
Figure 6. Two-tailed odds against chance for z scores in Figure 5.
Figure 7. Observed z scores (in blue, 6-hour sliding window, September 3 to 13) vs. similar scores (in pink) using pseudorandomly
generated data. This confirms that the analytical method does not introduce artifacts into the results. The "0" on the x-axis
indicates the beginning of a day boundary.
Figure 8. One-tailed odds associated with the z scores in Figure 5, on a log scale.
Figure 9. Dates associated with maximum z scores obtained after applying sliding windows ranging from 5 minutes to 12 hours in
length, in 5 minute increments (a total of 144 windows), to data from July 15 - September 16. The date where the majority (60%) of
the maximum z scores occurs is September 11. This indicates that the anomaly observed on September 11 is not especially sensitive to
the choice of specific window lengths.
Figure 10. Number of times that September 11appears in the top 10 maximum z scores, after applying the 144 different window lengths.
The majority of maximum z scores appears in window lengths ranging from 5.2 to 6.8 hours, suggesting that the length of the "event"
on September 11 may be in this range.
Figure 11. Time of day associated with sliding windows resulting in maximum z scores observed on September 11. The clustering of
times suggests that the "event" may have had three especially meaningful moments.
Figure 12. z scores associated with individual eggs shown in composite in Figure 5.
Egg
Type
Host
Category
Hemisphere
111
Auckland
New Zealand
Australia
East
161
Sydney
Australia
Australia
East
1024
Auckland
New Zealand
Australia
East
37
Neuchâtel
Switzerland
Europe
East
101
Edinburgh
Scotland
Europe
East
105
Paris
France
Europe
East
107
Freiburg
Germany
Europe
East
112
Neuchâtel
Switzerland
Europe
East
116
Wien
Austria
Europe
East
134
Malmö
Sweden
Europe
East
142
Søborg
Denmark
Europe
East
1022
Braunschweig
Germany
Europe
East
2006
England
England
Europe
East
2173
Toulouse
France
Europe
East
114
Madras
India
Other
East
119
Grahamstown
South Africa
Other
East
1026
Bangalore
India
Other
East
2225
Sheva
Israel
Other
East
108
Sao
Brazil
South Am
West
1013
Mogi
Brazil
South Am
West
1
NJ
USA
USA
West
28
NJ
USA
USA
West
34
NJ
USA
USA
West
106
NY
USA
USA
West
110
CO
USA
USA
West
115
Alberta
Canada
USA
West
118
CA
USA
USA
West
226
Ontario
Canada
USA
West
1005
CA
USA
USA
West
1021
CA
USA
USA
West
1029
NC
USA
USA
West
1223
NC
USA
USA
West
2000
WI
USA
USA
West
2001
CA
USA
USA
West
2002
TX
USA
USA
West
2222
MI
USA
USA
West
Table 1. This lists the egg numbers and their associated locations in terms of state or region, country, continent (roughly), and
hemisphere.
Category
z(9:10 AM)
West Hemi
3.14
East Hemi
1.57
Table 2. Analysis of 6-hour windowed Stouffer Z scores associated with 9:10 AM, September 11, by combining all eggs within each
hemisphere. This suggests that a larger effect "occurred" in the Western hemisphere
Category
Num
z(9:10 AM)
Australia
3
1.12
Europe
11
0.34
Other
4
1.80
South Am
2
2.15
North Am
16
2.57
Table 3. Analysis of 6-hour windowed Stouffer Z scores at 9:10 AM, by country, possibly suggesting that the primary "effect" took
place in North America.
Region
Num
Comp Peak
East
7
3.0
Middle
5
0.9
West
4
0.2
Table 4. Analysis of North American eggs, suggesting that the primary "effect" was in the East coast.
Summary: Through analysis of 144 sliding windows, from 5 minutes to 12 hours, in 5 minute increments, we find that over a period of
3 months, one date is associated with a statistical anomaly: September 11, 2001. On this date, the time range appearing most often
is 6 AM - 10 AM, peaking around 9:00 - 10:00 AM, and the location primarily the East Coast of the USA.
god, the humiliation !1!!!!
>
experiment at school. this is some years ago.
oddly enough it was with chickens
timewise i think it must have come first
gea jones>
>
Sub-zero content. When you make a prediction before rather than after
the event, get back to us.
One is vastly amused that Princess Diana's huge and expensive stable
of psychics, astrologers, and other vermin one and all missed a little
blip on her chart that plunged them all into immediate unemployment.
Where were the calls of "disaster!" prior to 11 Sept 2001? How 'bout
the Muslim psychic bunghole artistes and the dropping of a daisycutter
munition?
"See, the charts said Lower Elbonia would be daisycuttered exactly
when it happened, mas Allah!"
The Book of Mormon exactly predicts Columbus discovering the New World
- exact to the very day! This would carry more weight if the Book of
Mormon had been written pror to 1492 rather than in 1830.
Go ahead, make a verifiable prediction into the future rather than
into the past. We'll wait. Religion is always jam yesterday and
maramalade tomorrow, but dry toast for breakfast today. Test of
faith!
Uncle Al says, "there are 27O million Americans. The US is filthy
with one-in-a-million events."
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
Lucianarchy <lu...@narchy.frsrv.net> wrote in message
news:9uspfk$gk8$1...@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Global Consciousness Project Analysis for September 11, 2001
>
> Dean Radin
>
> Institute of Noetic Sciences
>
> Based upon an analysis of 3 months of GCP data, I conclude that a statistical
> anomaly occurred that was associated with the date,
> time and general location of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
He means based on a load of bullshit.
Based on an analysis of your data, I conclude that you are one cog short of a
clock mechanism.
Y2k1Steve...
"I never learned a damn thing until I thought I knew everything"
> Global Consciousness Project Analysis for September 11, 2001
>
> Dean Radin
>
> Institute of Noetic Sciences
That's a cute euphemism for Institute of Horseshit.
> Based upon an analysis of 3 months of GCP data, I conclude that a
statistical anomaly occurred
Isn't that a hell of a deal?! A statistical anomaly! Years of work, tens
of millions of dollars, thousands (okay, maybe dozens) of gullible people
buffaloed, and he reports a statistical fucking anomaly.
Most likely, the statistical anomaly was factitious. I'm glad he didn't try
to "conclude" some other kind of anomaly, cause and effect, etc.
Our Family Website: http://members.tripod.com/unclenono/Kingstons/index.htm
---
"Lucianarchy" <lu...@narchy.frsrv.net> wrote in message
news:9uspfk$gk8$1...@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
Our Family Website: http://members.tripod.com/unclenono/Kingstons/index.htm
---
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:3C123E6D...@hate.spam.net...
Like a pimple on the face of superhumanity.
Get this off topic crap off of sci.physics. [Old Man]