I believe that all thoughts come from outside the body. All thoughts
come from the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and the mind/brain is
more like a radio receiver or radio antennae. I arrived at this
conclusion or theory from the concept of Superdeterminism of
the Atom Totality with John Bell's inequality and the Alain Aspect
experiments. You see, you cannot have superdeterminism without
a complete and utter control of every thought. That every thought
was created by some "central organization" and that central
control would be the Nucleus of the Atom Totality.
So, I ask myself, how can I prove that all thoughts of all living
creatures really comes from outside the body and that the brain and
mind are merely fancy and elaborate radio antennae or radios.
And that every human thought was shot into the brain of that
human from the Nucleus.
Well, after watching a TV show of stories of chickens. There was
one story of a chicken that lived for months and years? after its
head was cut off. Chickens have small heads and small brains.
And so, cutting off chickens heads as an experiment would tend
to reveal after perhaps one in a thousand or 100 thousand of
a chicken minus a head yet go about as if normal.
If it can be shown with humans that a human minus a head or
a brain can live and can think as evidenced by his/her drawing
or writing or speaking that such a case would prove definitively
that a brain and a head are not necessary to have "thoughts".
Human history afforded us a chapter of a resemblance to the
massive yearly slaughter of chickens. It was the French guillotine
era. In a sense, the French guillotine era was like a modern
day chicken harvesting experiment. Some stories remain during
the French guillotine history of cases where beheaded persons
walked around and some even picked up their heads.
Some will say it is a post death reaction like a frog with its
legs cut off or a grasshopper with its legs cut off responding
to environment stimulus.
But I would say that if the Brain Locus theory were true, then
a person without a head, without a brain can still think. That the
brain is really *just one atom* that receives the signals from
the Nucleus.
Perhaps we can conduct experiments with animals that have
small brains and when their brains are completely removed,
can they function like normal? Chickens without a head
have a 1 in a million chances of living after a head removal.
But what about animals such as grasshoppers or ticks. Here
I am looking for the perfect laboratory animal to do experiments
with and the tick is ideal in these circumstances. They are
easy to observe because they are slow moving and because
their brains are very small. If we take a batch of ticks and remove
their brains and observe them to a normal batch of ticks, would
there be any difference between the brainless ones and the
normal ones? I suspect not. That the brainless ones will replace
their lost brains with a new brain locus, a new atom will become
their brain.
There is another prevalent aspect in animal behavior that supports
the Brain Locus theory. It is the behaviour of multipersonalities
by a single individual. Some people are more than one person
in thoughts and that their minds harbor several people. In the Brain
Locus theory where all thoughts originate outside the body,
multipersonality is accounted for as a Brain Locus that has
interference from several channels all in one spot. Like a radio
that seems to receive the signal from two different stations all on
one channel.
And where the chemical element of lithium so often helps
medical patients who suffer from brain diseases. Lends credence
to the idea that lithium works so well because it nudges the
Brain Locus atom into better reception. And that sleep is
needed by animals with brains because the Brain Locus needs a
"nightly refocusing or recalibration onto the Nucleus waves"
much like retuning a radio every now and then.
What is multipersonality? Is it perhaps a Brain Locus that has
multi atoms as the Brain Locus instead of a single atom? Like
putting several receivers into a radio and one time one receiver
is on and others off?
Proof of the Brain Locus theory versus the establishment theory
that "thoughts originate inside the body". Proof would be
conclusive if it were found that a human without a head at all,
managed to stay alive and was capable of writing, drawing.
Proving that this headless person still had a "mind" even though
no brain and no head. The headless chicken as shown on PBS
TV hints that a human can do the same.
Multipersonality of people will not prove the Brain Locus theory
is true and the chemical-in-body theory is false. But multipersonality
behaviour tends to support the Brain Locus theory. Multipersonality
tends to suggest that the Brain Locus maybe more than one atom but
could be a fancy structure such as a molecule or several atoms.
What multipersonality may show us is to the degree of what the
Brain Locus as a apparatus actually is. Perhaps the Brain Locus
is not a single atom but rather is a molecule, perhaps one
DNA molecule sets itself as the Brain Locus.
Much much research will have to be conducted to answer the
above questions.