Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

rules disagreement, help please

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael Strato

unread,
Jan 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/29/00
to
Hi Rich,

Number 2 is correct.

Here are some links to rules should you need to know of other situations
that arise:

http://www.bkgm.com/rules.html

http://www.nebg.org/rules

http://www.oasya.com/HTMLHelp/Backgammon/rules.html


Regards,

Michael


"Scott R. Vechinski" <sv...@hiwaay.net> wrote in message
news:_H1l4.5832$ox5.1...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com...
> Scenario 2 is indeed correct.
> --Scott
> rt wrote in message <3894A223...@sympatico.ca>...
> Hi,
> My wife and I are having a disagreement over the rules: I think
> scenario 2 is correct, please give your opinion.
>
> 1. When a players checker lands on a blot (taking the other players
> checker) it must remain there until the next turn ( i.e., rolling a 2 and
4,
> a player may not land on a blot with the 2, then proceed to use the 4 to
> move off off that point)
>
> 2. When a players checker lands on a blot (taking the other players
> checker) it may then be moved off of that point using the value of the
other
> die. ( i.e., rolling a 2 and 4, a player may land on a blot with the 2,
then
> proceed to use the 4 to move off off that point).
>
> Thanks.
>
> Rich
>
>
>

rt

unread,
Jan 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/30/00
to

Scott R. Vechinski

unread,
Jan 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/30/00
to
Scenario 2 is indeed correct.
--Scott
rt wrote in message <3894A223...@sympatico.ca>...

JP White

unread,
Jan 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/30/00
to
rt wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My wife and I are having a disagreement over the rules: I think
> scenario 2 is correct, please give your opinion.
>
> 1. When a players checker lands on a blot (taking the other players
> checker) it must remain there until the next turn ( i.e., rolling a 2
> and 4, a player may not land on a blot with the 2, then proceed to use
> the 4 to move off off that point)
>
> 2. When a players checker lands on a blot (taking the other players
> checker) it may then be moved off of that point using the value of the
> other die. ( i.e., rolling a 2 and 4, a player may land on a blot with
> the 2, then proceed to use the 4 to move off off that point).
>

Scenario 2 is indeed correct. (This assumes that the 2nd move of the 4
in your example is in itself a legal move, furthermore if the landing
place of the 'second die' is another blot, then two checkers are sent to
the bar).

I suggest you visit

http://www.northcoast.com/~mccool/bg.html

this has a begginners article that may make you aware of other standard
rules of play.

the following site is also hepful for learning the basics.

http://www.cyberarts.com/bgbasics.html

>
> Thanks.
>
> Rich

--
JP White
Mailto:jp.w...@nashville.com

EdmondT

unread,
Feb 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/2/00
to
>rt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> My wife and I are having a disagreement over the rules: I think
>> scenario 2 is correct, please give your opinion.
>>
>> 1. When a players checker lands on a blot (taking the other players
>> checker) it must remain there until the next turn ( i.e., rolling a 2
>> and 4, a player may not land on a blot with the 2, then proceed to use
>> the 4 to move off off that point)
>>
>> 2. When a players checker lands on a blot (taking the other players
>> checker) it may then be moved off of that point using the value of the
>> other die. ( i.e., rolling a 2 and 4, a player may land on a blot with
>> the 2, then proceed to use the 4 to move off off that point).
>

There is a version of BG that some play that says you can't "hit and run" --
though I've only seen it applied on your home board. (ie you can't hit and run
there.) I think this is popular with middle eastern players. So its worth
checking with people before you play.

Edm...@aol.com

0 new messages