General War Plan, China (Destroy the Chinese Nation!)
Doogie
news:382f6385.2455540@news...
> I believe that the time has come to take action against the Communist
> Chinese. The United States should immidiately undertake a major
> campagin to bring about the destuction of communism and the Chinese
> nation as a whole.
>
> In invading China it is important to remember that;
> -China's Army, despite its numbers, is weak and could be easily
> crushed through strong application of strategic airpower
> -The Air and Naval capaibilities of China are nearly non-existant
> -Japan has invaded China in the past and won
> -China is vulerable to air attack to an unprecedented degree
>
> The attack would begin as soon as the Chinese provided a suitable
> pretext and would be designed to put China back 100 years. The menace
> of the Chinese with their deviance would be forever crushed under the
> weight of our munitions.
>
> Before anything began the government of the PRC would be issued the
> following letter;
> "Dear Chairman,
>
> We are commencing an attack on your nation. You may be thinking of
> using your strategic nuclear arsenal on us. Please feel free to do
> so, but be warned. At the most you might attack our west coast and
> kill perhaps 5 million Americans. If you do so we will respond
> without restriction, namely for every single nuclear weapon you use on
> use we will use 200 against you. For example, f you used a nuclear
> weapon to attack Los Angeles we would destroy the 200 largest Chinese
> cities. If you were to conduct a full nuclear attack we would abandon
> all restraint and destroy the Chinese people totally and utterly.
> This would include any terrioory occupied by us. We would withdraw
> and destroy any cities. So, in a generation American will have
> recovered and the Chinese nation and people will be a memory.
>
> Just try us.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> President of the United States"
>
> The opening days of the offensive would involve grabbing command of
> the air. In gaining air supremecy we'll learn a lesson that it will
> be important to remember throughout the campaign, namely that the
> Chinese may be technically incompetent, but there's a hell of a lot of
> them. We'll have to swat them down like flies. US aircraft (with
> some help from Taiwan and the UK) should have no trouble clearing the
> patheric PLAAF from the skies. As soon as this is done US aircraft
> should begin a campaign of (conventional) strategic bombing. The
> first targets being the dams on every river to the souith of the North
> China plain. This would be followed by area bombings of Chinese
> industry and troop concentrations in Manchuria. Hopefully the dam
> busting (if done correctly) will wash away nearly every major city in
> south china. In that event countervalue nuclear weapons would be
> retargeted against refugee concentrations.
>
> This would be followed by an invasion of North Korea, making full use
> of American strategic bombers to crush North Korean troop
> concentrations. We would then conduct simotantious landings at Hong
> Kong and Dalian. These would be conducted with full air support
> irrespective of other damage. Additionally US Armored forces from
> North Korea togethr with the Taiwanese Army would move south.
>
> Ulitmately the drive would move for Beijing where, if necessary
> Chemical weapons would be used to destroy Chinese troops
> concentrations (when their hordes of illiterate peasants tried to
> attack us). If the Chinese responed with Chemical weapons we'd use
> nuclear weapons on various targets.
>
> After about 45 days we'd have encircled Beijing. We'd then let the
> Nationalist Chinese go into the city while Americans held the
> perimeter (American lives being far too valuable to waste in city
> based fighting).
>
> After the war was over Hong Kong would return to the UK, Manchuria
> would go to Taiwan, and the United States would occupy what remained
> of Beijing. Further the United States would loot the economic assets
> of China for the costs of the war (+50%). American street gangs would
> be brought into the South of China and given advanced weapons.
> Hopefully what remained of China would be reduced to warlordism, which
> is what the Chinese deserve.
i sincerely hope that was an attempt at humour, although i don't really see
anything funny about it...
The Patriot
The Expatriate
<temp...@usa.nospam.net> wrote:
> The Patriot <worl...@home.com> wrote in message
> news:382f6385.2455540@news...
>
> <"Patriotic" tome snipped>
>
> i sincerely hope that was an attempt at humour, although i don't really see
> anything funny about it...
More like an attempt at trolling. You responded, so it worked.
John Galt
irrational mystic that you were. Fortunately, I read on and then realized
that this was a spoof, and that you were making fun of the way most
Americans think. Well done.
Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3830a694.726170@news...
> We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
> of society we want to live in;
>
> Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
> as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
> pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
>
> America must engage in a great battle against all of here enemies,
> both foerign and domestic. We must go forth upon the earth and smite
> the enemies of liberty and freedom. The freedom and liberty to be
> American. The freedom and liberty to fight and to obey.
>
> We must forget the half-hearted confrontationalism of Ronald Reagan
> and go all the way. There is no reason for us to obey any convetnion
> of international law. Simply put, we ar e the leaders in everything.
> There is no one who can stop us. We should crush and kill everything
> that isan't American (Canadian)!
>
> We should spen 50% of the GDP on military expenditures and invade
> China, killing as many of them as we can! We should crush, kill and
> destroy all of them!
>
> We should destroy Europe and it's second-hander socialism which
> promises to infect the earth with it's evil! We must preserve the
> Earth under American for all time!
jerome rondeau
Robert A. Templeton wrote:
(SNIP)
> We must forget the half-hearted confrontationalism of Ronald Reagan
> and go all the way. There is no reason for us to obey any convetnion
> of international law. Simply put, we ar e the leaders in everything.
> There is no one who can stop us. We should crush and kill everything
> that isan't American (Canadian)!
>
Hey don't go including us Canadians in your "We are the US fucking A,
so listen or else" fantasy. You want to play the ugly american, you're
on your own.
Jerome
Eric Berge
wrote:
>Dude, you need to find a house deep in the mountains. You need to build a
>thick wall around it. Lock yourself in and continue the fine neanderthalic
>tradition of breeding a family tree that doesn't fork.
I would like to point out at this juncture that without some initial
forking, there can be no subsequent breeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Berge
(remove _ for address)
Therefore since the world has still
Much good, but much less good than ill,
I'd face it as a wise man would,
o_ \ > And train for ill and not for good.
<| ' ,_|
___/_>____o)____ - A.E. Housman, "A Shropshire Lad"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
William December Starr
> Obviously, you want to preserve your chances to score with other
> men... You commie pinko fuck.
I just glanced at that last sentence out of the corner of my eye at
first and it looked like "You commie piano fuck." Which makes as much
sense and has an endearing air of goofiness to it as well, I think.
Commie piano fuck. Coming soon to a newsgroup near you.
-- William December Starr <wds...@crl.com>
Paul Werner (FLE/LIN)
I read this and was just wondering... What about Tibet?
_________
The Patriot
wrote:
>
>i sincerely hope that was an attempt at humour, although i don't really see
>anything funny about it...
This most certianly is not a joke you commie piece of trash, I hope
that you are destroyed.
Robert A. Templeton
of society we want to live in;
Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
America must engage in a great battle against all of here enemies,
both foerign and domestic. We must go forth upon the earth and smite
the enemies of liberty and freedom. The freedom and liberty to be
American. The freedom and liberty to fight and to obey.
We must forget the half-hearted confrontationalism of Ronald Reagan
and go all the way. There is no reason for us to obey any convetnion
of international law. Simply put, we ar e the leaders in everything.
There is no one who can stop us. We should crush and kill everything
that isan't American (Canadian)!
We should spen 50% of the GDP on military expenditures and invade
<< * BenjoŠ * >>
yourself to a mental hospital. Or are you in need of a job,
the new shitler?
Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3830a694.726170@news...
Ian Davis
>
> We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
> of society we want to live in;
[snipped]
No, I'm much too little and not at all fat. Wait for the next billy
goat Gruff, he's much bigger and much fatter than me.
Ian.
Jeffrey C. Dege
>
>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
>as a normal state?
Well, yes. Considering the alternatives.
--
The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be
regarded as a criminal offence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra, SIGPLAN Notices, Volume 17, Number 5
Rick Jones
Templeton) wrote:
>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
>of society we want to live in;
>
>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
>as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
>pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
Woo hoo!
Robert A. Templeton
<fama...@casema.net> wrote:
>I guess this is a joke. Otherwise you really have to commit
>yourself to a mental hospital. Or are you in need of a job,
>the new shitler?
No, you stupid fuck. This is real. But you don't care since you
obviously a cocaine addicted queer.
Robert A. Templeton
wrote:
>At first, you really pissed me off. I was all set to let you know what an
>irrational mystic that you were. Fortunately, I read on and then realized
>that this was a spoof, and that you were making fun of the way most
>Americans think. Well done.
Well, Mr. Galt. I'm not surprised that you diagree given that you're
obviously an Objectivist, and well all know that objectivists are
slimy athiest pedophilles.
Robert A. Templeton
Dege) wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
>>as a normal state?
>
>Well, yes. Considering the alternatives.
Obviously, you want to preserve your chances to score with other
Robert A. Templeton
wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A.
>Templeton) wrote:
>
>>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
>>of society we want to live in;
>>
>>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
>>as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
>>pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
>
>Woo hoo!
I'm glad to see that you support degenercy. If there were any justice
in this world you would be killed for you faggotry.
Don Wagner
anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A. Templeton) wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:05:57 GMT, ricj...@cgocable.net (Rick Jones)
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A.
> >Templeton) wrote:
> >
> >>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what
kind
> >>of society we want to live in;
> >>
> >>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to
exist
> >>as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
> >>pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
> >
> >Woo hoo!
>
> I'm glad to see that you support degenercy. If there were any justice
> in this world you would be killed for you faggotry.
And you, with your blind faith that your particular permutation of the
Christian superstition must be paramount, will surely bring order,
peace and love to the planet.
Or Else.
Don Wagner
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
<< * BenjoŠ * >>
Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3830c3dc.6065559@news...
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:05:57 GMT, ricj...@cgocable.net (Rick Jones)
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A.
> >Templeton) wrote:
> >
> >>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
> >>of society we want to live in;
> >>
> >>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
> >>as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
> >>pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
> >
> >Woo hoo!
>
> I'm glad to see that you support degenercy. If there were any justice
> in this world you would be killed for you faggotry.
I would say: just come and visit us in The Netherlands so we can
kick some American ass.
--
"PURITANISM - the haunting fear that someone, somewhere may be happy."
H.L. Mencken
[Message by Benjo夜
Robert A. Templeton
<fama...@casema.net> wrote:
>
>Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>news:3830c3dc.6065559@news...
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:05:57 GMT, ricj...@cgocable.net (Rick Jones)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A.
>> >Templeton) wrote:
>> >
>> >>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
>> >>of society we want to live in;
>> >>
>> >>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
>> >>as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
>> >>pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
>> >
>> >Woo hoo!
>>
>> I'm glad to see that you support degenercy. If there were any justice
>> in this world you would be killed for you faggotry.
>
>I would say: just come and visit us in The Netherlands so we can
>kick some American ass.
>--
Go ahead you pot-smoking jackass. I'll fucking wipe the floor with
your queer ass any fucking day.
Ron Nicholson
You sound so butch. Luckily I like my men that way.
Don Wagner
> >I would say: just come and visit us in The Netherlands so we can
> >kick some American ass.
> >--
>
> Go ahead you pot-smoking jackass. I'll fucking wipe the floor with
> your queer ass any fucking day.
OOOOOHHHH!!!! Hit him with your purse Robbie!!!!
<< * BenjoŠ * >>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 04:16:48 +0100, "<< * BenjoŠ * >>"
> <fama...@casema.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >news:3830c3dc.6065559@news...
> >> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:05:57 GMT, ricj...@cgocable.net (Rick Jones)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A.
> >> >Templeton) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
> >> >>of society we want to live in;
> >> >>
> >> >>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
> >> >>as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
> >> >>pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
> >> >
> >> >Woo hoo!
> >>
> >> I'm glad to see that you support degenercy. If there were any justice
> >> in this world you would be killed for you faggotry.
> >
> >kick some American ass.
> >--
>
> Go ahead you pot-smoking jackass. I'll fucking wipe the floor with
> your queer ass any fucking day.
In your dreams boy, only in your dreams! Or better in your nightmares. Just
think of this: I'm a married man, LEGALLY married with another man.
I guess you're here only to amuse us. but scum, you really have to do
a better job, till now you are just a bore.
--
"PURITANISM - the haunting fear that someone, somewhere may be happy."
H.L. Mencken
[Message by BenjoŠ]
Jeffrey C. Dege
>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 01:45:32 GMT, jd...@jdege.visi.com (Jeffrey C.
>
>>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
>>>as a normal state?
>>
>
>Obviously, you want to preserve your chances to score with other
>men... You commie pinko fuck.
Actually, I'm a libertarian.
Why do you find the idea of homoerotic so repulsive? I mean, the idea
of making love to another man rather unexciting. The sight of another
man, naked, fills me with, well, nothing, really.
I mean, intellectually, I can see why a gay guy might be excited by the
thought of gay sex. But deep down, I can't really see anything in it.
We have a guy come by every year or two to ream out our sewer line.
It's a but messy, but basically rather dull to watch. In my eyes,
homosexual sex is about as interesting.
What is there about it that triggers such a strong emotional reaction
in you?
--
It must be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to plan, more
doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to manage, than the creation of
a new system. For the initiator has the emnity of all who would profit
by the preservation of the old institutions and merely lukewarm defenders
in those who would gain by the new ones.
-- Niccolo Machiavelli, 1513
CDDempsey
thick wall around it. Lock yourself in and continue the fine neanderthalic
tradition of breeding a family tree that doesn't fork.
Get some common sense and a grip on reality. Your bucket has sprung a leak
and the rest of us are getting wet.
Deborah
wrote:
>I would like to point out at this juncture that without some initial
>forking, there can be no subsequent breeding.
<chuckle>
Well if this troll becomes a major headache, just refer to his header
field that reads:
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
Deborah
Kristopher/EOS
>
> <snip trip trop>
Sorry, I'm not going to cross your bridge.
Kristopher/EOS
Henry
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:12:49 +0100, "<< * BenjoŠ * >>"
> <fama...@casema.net> wrote:
>
> >I guess this is a joke. Otherwise you really have to commit
> >yourself to a mental hospital. Or are you in need of a job,
> >the new shitler?
>
> No, you stupid fuck. This is real. But you don't care since you
> obviously a cocaine addicted queer.
Is must be Simpleton,not Templeton.
Henry
Well General Patriot,
Want to invade China? Why not buy a uniform,a rubber boat and a rifle at
an Army/Navy store and then invade China. You don't need sane people to
go along with you. You can do it alone.
Let me know if you win!
Tinker
Hi fren, have you try sending your script to Hollywood or Bollywood?
Makes a good thriller, if Steven Spielberg buys the story. But
perhaps, Star Trek sounds more realistic since your's don't quite fall
in category of sci-fi. And...teaching the US President how to write a
letter, eh? You must be nuts! Stop fooling around and get back to your
hole.
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
It can't be that hard, Vietnam ground the PRC drones to a halt in 1979
and forced them to get their collective asses back into China and look
at the difference in size!
EBB
Doogie
news:3830a598.474265@news...
> On Sun, 14 Nov 1999 23:03:21 -0400, "Doogie" <temp...@usa.nospam.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >i sincerely hope that was an attempt at humour, although i don't really
see
> >anything funny about it...
>
>
> This most certianly is not a joke you commie piece of trash, I hope
> that you are destroyed.
hmmmmm.... well, i can now add 'commie piece of trash' to the list of names
i've been called by people on usenet who don't like/agree with what I'm
saying... what with 'left wing loon' and 'right wing crazy' all i need now
are 'tree hugging hippy' and 'fascist' and i've got bingo!
well, since you've said it was no joke, i'll get serious now, here's my
opinion of what the various results would be:
1) knowing they are going to be invaded and destroyed anyway, the Chinese
launch a nuclear attack on the US, this results in a nuclear counter attack
by the US, which results in just about every nuclar power firing at someone
else, end result: nuclear holocaust, nuclear winter, end of all man kind...
2) Vietnam, that sound familiar to you? various sides supporting China
supply weapons, you said before, China has the numbers, war lasts forever,
no real result.... ("We'll whip those Krauts and be home by Christmas" -
British opinion of the 'Great War', 1914)
3) It actually works (I don't think that's likely, but...), this has two
possibilities, which both end in pretty much the same way: a) the rest of
the world, horrified by the attrocities committed against the Chinese
civilians, declares the president a war criminal guilty of various human
rights violations,where it leads from there, my guess would be probably
World War III
b) various countires, afraid that
the US will do the same thing to them because their relations have been less
than stelar, retaliate, if there's enough of them, WWIII, if not, a
terrorist reign on major US cities
-Doogie
Jim Thomas
> of society we want to live in;
Good 'ol Bob T. International Man of Confusedness
Jim Thomas
MJVJ Enterprises
jb...@bwwonline.com
IBO # 0827517
Jim Thomas
> of society we want to live in;
Bob T. Man o' the year. ;-)
Rainbow Christian
Templeton) wrote:
- We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
- of society we want to live in;
-
- Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
- as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
- pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
-
- America must engage in a great battle against all of here enemies,
- both foerign and domestic. We must go forth upon the earth and smite
- the enemies of liberty and freedom. The freedom and liberty to be
- American. The freedom and liberty to fight and to obey.
-
- We must forget the half-hearted confrontationalism of Ronald Reagan
- and go all the way. There is no reason for us to obey any convetnion
- of international law. Simply put, we ar e the leaders in everything.
- There is no one who can stop us. We should crush and kill everything
- that isan't American (Canadian)!
-
- We should spen 50% of the GDP on military expenditures and invade
- China, killing as many of them as we can! We should crush, kill and
- destroy all of them!
You notice this person didn't say which "Lord" hw wished to "do battle for"?
Can we say "Saaaaayyy-tuuuuuun"?
He certainly is not a Christian.
-
- We should destroy Europe and it's second-hander socialism which
- promises to infect the earth with it's evil! We must preserve the
- Earth under American for all time!
--
Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/Heights/1734
-
Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true. whatever is noble, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable - if anything is excellent or praiseworthy - think about such things. Philippiams 4:8
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.ufmcc.com
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
Ken Lee
place without you bastard. Go see a psychiatrist if you can't stop day
dreaming or get a plastic surgeon if no women want you. Go fuck.
Hugh Nicholson
think they hurt China? Ha Ha Ha...
The Patriot <worl...@home.com> wrote in message
news:382f6385.2455540@news...
> I believe that the time has come to take action against the Communist
> Chinese. The United States should immidiately undertake a major
> campagin to bring about the destuction of communism and the Chinese
> nation as a whole.
>
> In invading China it is important to remember that;
> -China's Army, despite its numbers, is weak and could be easily
> crushed through strong application of strategic airpower
> -The Air and Naval capaibilities of China are nearly non-existant
> -Japan has invaded China in the past and won
> -China is vulerable to air attack to an unprecedented degree
>
> The attack would begin as soon as the Chinese provided a suitable
> pretext and would be designed to put China back 100 years. The menace
> of the Chinese with their deviance would be forever crushed under the
> weight of our munitions.
>
> Before anything began the government of the PRC would be issued the
> following letter;
> "Dear Chairman,
>
> We are commencing an attack on your nation. You may be thinking of
> using your strategic nuclear arsenal on us. Please feel free to do
> so, but be warned. At the most you might attack our west coast and
> kill perhaps 5 million Americans. If you do so we will respond
> without restriction, namely for every single nuclear weapon you use on
> use we will use 200 against you. For example, f you used a nuclear
> weapon to attack Los Angeles we would destroy the 200 largest Chinese
> cities. If you were to conduct a full nuclear attack we would abandon
> all restraint and destroy the Chinese people totally and utterly.
> This would include any terrioory occupied by us. We would withdraw
> and destroy any cities. So, in a generation American will have
> recovered and the Chinese nation and people will be a memory.
>
> Just try us.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> President of the United States"
>
> The opening days of the offensive would involve grabbing command of
> the air. In gaining air supremecy we'll learn a lesson that it will
> be important to remember throughout the campaign, namely that the
> Chinese may be technically incompetent, but there's a hell of a lot of
> them. We'll have to swat them down like flies. US aircraft (with
> some help from Taiwan and the UK) should have no trouble clearing the
> patheric PLAAF from the skies. As soon as this is done US aircraft
> should begin a campaign of (conventional) strategic bombing. The
> first targets being the dams on every river to the souith of the North
> China plain. This would be followed by area bombings of Chinese
> industry and troop concentrations in Manchuria. Hopefully the dam
> busting (if done correctly) will wash away nearly every major city in
> south china. In that event countervalue nuclear weapons would be
> retargeted against refugee concentrations.
>
> This would be followed by an invasion of North Korea, making full use
> of American strategic bombers to crush North Korean troop
> concentrations. We would then conduct simotantious landings at Hong
> Kong and Dalian. These would be conducted with full air support
> irrespective of other damage. Additionally US Armored forces from
> North Korea togethr with the Taiwanese Army would move south.
>
> Ulitmately the drive would move for Beijing where, if necessary
> Chemical weapons would be used to destroy Chinese troops
> concentrations (when their hordes of illiterate peasants tried to
> attack us). If the Chinese responed with Chemical weapons we'd use
> nuclear weapons on various targets.
>
> After about 45 days we'd have encircled Beijing. We'd then let the
> Nationalist Chinese go into the city while Americans held the
> perimeter (American lives being far too valuable to waste in city
> based fighting).
>
> After the war was over Hong Kong would return to the UK, Manchuria
> would go to Taiwan, and the United States would occupy what remained
> of Beijing. Further the United States would loot the economic assets
> of China for the costs of the war (+50%). American street gangs would
> be brought into the South of China and given advanced weapons.
> Hopefully what remained of China would be reduced to warlordism, which
> is what the Chinese deserve.
Henry
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 06:58:19 -0500, Henry <her...@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
> >The Patriot wrote:
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >i sincerely hope that was an attempt at humour, although i don't really see
> >> >anything funny about it...
> >>
> >> This most certianly is not a joke you commie piece of trash, I hope
> >> that you are destroyed.
> >
> >
> >Want to invade China? Why not buy a uniform,a rubber boat and a rifle at
> >an Army/Navy store and then invade China. You don't need sane people to
> >go along with you. You can do it alone.
> >Let me know if you win!
>
> It can't be that hard, Vietnam ground the PRC drones to a halt in 1979
> and forced them to get their collective asses back into China and look
> at the difference in size!
>
Do you really think that was an American victory?
Do you think that life is cheap in America?
Henry
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 04:16:48 +0100, "<< * BenjoŠ * >>"
> <fama...@casema.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >news:3830c3dc.6065559@news...
> >> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:05:57 GMT, ricj...@cgocable.net (Rick Jones)
> >>
> >> >On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A.
> >> >Templeton) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> I'm glad to see that you support degenercy. If there were any justice
> >> in this world you would be killed for you faggotry.
> >
> >I would say: just come and visit us in The Netherlands so we can
> >kick some American ass.
> >--
>
> Go ahead you pot-smoking jackass. I'll fucking wipe the floor with
> your queer ass any fucking day.
Doogie
>
> >On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, Robert A. Templeton
<anti...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
> >>as a normal state?
> >
>
> Obviously, you want to preserve your chances to score with other
> men... You commie pinko fuck.
hmmmmm.... Bobby, you don't happen to be related to 'The Patriot' who posts
long detailed rants on how to destroy China, and likes to call people who
don't like those posts commies, do you? (probably not, he prefers other
newsgroups, although some of your choice of newsgroups for this post seem to
follow the same plan, you both have the same abuse email address, the same
first name (patriot accidently used his real email address, which he had
used to post before in another group under another name), and use the same
news server to post... makes me wonder...) oh well, probably just too much
of a coincidence...
-Doogie
(who's wondering wtf a commie pinko fuck is)
Doogie
news:gspmcc-1611...@1cust121.tnt50.chi5.da.uu.net...
<snip>
>
> You notice this person didn't say which "Lord" hw wished to "do battle
for"?
>
>
> Can we say "Saaaaayyy-tuuuuuun"?
>
> He certainly is not a Christian.
yah, i noticed that one too..... wonder if he can make his head do a 360,
i'd pay to actually see that....
-Doogie
Leif Magnar Kj|nn|y
Doogie <temp...@usa.nospam.net> wrote:
>Rainbow Christian <gsp...@nohate.poboxes.com> wrote in message
>news:gspmcc-1611...@1cust121.tnt50.chi5.da.uu.net...
>>
>>
>> He certainly is not a Christian.
>
>yah, i noticed that one too..... wonder if he can make his head do a 360,
>i'd pay to actually see that....
Hey, he's not one of ours. If you want him, you can keep him; any
messes he makes are yours to clean up.
--
Leif Kj{\o}nn{\o}y || www.pvv.org/~leifmk || Math geek and gamer
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Such is life upon the isle of torment and woe.
One day good, one day bad. And some days even hope." (MDB)
Dragonblaze
Templeton) wrote:
> We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what
> kind
> of society we want to live in;
[snip]
Hey! What happened to those billygoats?
Dragonblaze
- God? I'm no God. God has mercy. -
Matt Austern
> - We must forget the half-hearted confrontationalism of Ronald Reagan
> - and go all the way. There is no reason for us to obey any convetnion
> - of international law. Simply put, we ar e the leaders in everything.
> - There is no one who can stop us. We should crush and kill everything
> - that isan't American (Canadian)!
> -
> - We should spen 50% of the GDP on military expenditures and invade
> - China, killing as many of them as we can! We should crush, kill and
> - destroy all of them!
>
>
> You notice this person didn't say which "Lord" hw wished to "do battle for"?
>
>
> Can we say "Saaaaayyy-tuuuuuun"?
>
> He certainly is not a Christian.
You also notice that he chose to post to a really strange collection
of newsgroups? I'm reading this from rec.arts.sf.written; I think he
should tell us which science fiction novels best reflect his ideas.
(Maybe he'd like China Mountain Zhang, or State of the Art, or Ethan
of Athos.)
Doogie
news:fxtemdq...@isolde.engr.sgi.com...
<snip>
>
> You also notice that he chose to post to a really strange collection
> of newsgroups? I'm reading this from rec.arts.sf.written; I think he
> should tell us which science fiction novels best reflect his ideas.
> (Maybe he'd like China Mountain Zhang, or State of the Art, or Ethan
> of Athos.)
>
Maybe he'd like the ones in which the human race was seeded/helped to evolve
monkeys by aliens (i'm thinking along the lines of 2001 here...)
GOD's country
>
> The US lost the wars in Kosovo and Iraq, and not to mention Vietnam, you
> think they hurt China? Ha Ha Ha...
Seeing the condition of Kosovo, Iraq and Vietnam I dont think China
would appreciate that type of "victory".
Tomislav Grabic
Ken Lee schrieb:
> Please go back to your stupid video war game, the world will be a happy
> place without you bastard. Go see a psychiatrist if you can't stop day
> dreaming or get a plastic surgeon if no women want you. Go fuck.
^^^^^^^^
Without trying to be mean, I think this is the best suggestion so far. :-)
Tomislav Grabic
Hugh Nicholson schrieb:
Lee Ann Rucker
Templeton) wrote:
>>You also notice that he chose to post to a really strange collection
>>of newsgroups? I'm reading this from rec.arts.sf.written; I think he
>>should tell us which science fiction novels best reflect his ideas.
>>(Maybe he'd like China Mountain Zhang, or State of the Art, or Ethan
>>of Athos.)
>
>Oh, thats because I find that in rec.arts.sf.written there are:
>
>a) A lot of communists and other leftists
ObSF:
"He despised all [British] Southerners; by extension, he was sitting at
the North Pole"
(misquoted) _Good Omens_, Pratchett/Gaiman
--
Working at Apple for Javasoft
lru...@aruba.apple.com
Also at (but not very often) leeann...@eng.sun.com
Lee Ann Rucker
Templeton) wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 01:45:32 GMT, jd...@jdege.visi.com (Jeffrey C.
>Dege) wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, Robert A. Templeton
<anti...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
>>>as a normal state?
>>
>>Well, yes. Considering the alternatives.
>
>Obviously, you want to preserve your chances to score with other
>men...
Works for me
Lee Ann Rucker
Starr) wrote:
>Some troll-like creature said:
>
>> Obviously, you want to preserve your chances to score with other
>> men... You commie pinko fuck.
>
>I just glanced at that last sentence out of the corner of my eye at
>first and it looked like "You commie piano fuck." Which makes as much
>sense and has an endearing air of goofiness to it as well, I think.
>
>Commie piano fuck. Coming soon to a newsgroup near you.
One of the (many) $cientology terms for people Hubbie didn't like is
"false pianola case"
(Your guess is as good as mine)
William December Starr
anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A. Templeton) said:
>> You also notice that he chose to post to a really strange
>> collection of newsgroups? I'm reading this from
>> rec.arts.sf.written; I think he should tell us which science
>> fiction novels best reflect his ideas. (Maybe he'd like China
>> Mountain Zhang, or State of the Art, or Ethan of Athos.) [Matt
>> Austern]
>
> Oh, thats because I find that in rec.arts.sf.written there are:
> a) A lot of communists and other leftists
> b) the Feudalist
Okay, now -- assuming you feel like continuing your little joke any
further -- explain comp.sys.ibm-pc.games.naval.
-- William December Starr <wds...@crl.com>
Steve Taylor
> We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
> of society we want to live in;
Is it a full moon or something? The number of crank posts seems to have
suddenly shot through the rood.
Steve
Doug Palmer
That's why churches use rood screens. To help earth any religious
fervour before it reaches the altar.
--
Doug Palmer TARMS
WWW: http://users.orac.net.au/~doug
mail: do...@tarms.com, dou...@acm.org
Robert A. Templeton
>Please go back to your stupid video war game, the world will be a happy
>place without you bastard. Go see a psychiatrist if you can't stop day
>dreaming or get a plastic surgeon if no women want you. Go fuck.
Mr. Lee;
Learn to write coherntly before you post a message. Why don't you and
your life partner go home and get back to business.
Robert A. Templeton
<pwe...@soleil.acomp.usf.edu> wrote:
>
>I read this and was just wondering... What about Tibet?
>
After the war (since it's bound to surive the floods) it will recieve
the only food aid given to any Chinese. Then it will be granted full
independence, free from the tyrrany of oppresive Chinese rule.
Robert A. Templeton
wrote:
>Hugh Nicholson wrote:
>>
>> The US lost the wars in Kosovo and Iraq, and not to mention Vietnam, you
>> think they hurt China? Ha Ha Ha...
>
>Seeing the condition of Kosovo, Iraq and Vietnam I dont think China
>would appreciate that type of "victory".
I'm sorry to tell you, but we won all of those wars, you commie.
Robert A. Templeton
>gsp...@nohate.poboxes.com (Rainbow Christian) writes:
>
>> - We must forget the half-hearted confrontationalism of Ronald Reagan
>> - and go all the way. There is no reason for us to obey any convetnion
>> - of international law. Simply put, we ar e the leaders in everything.
>> - There is no one who can stop us. We should crush and kill everything
>> - that isan't American (Canadian)!
>> -
>> - We should spen 50% of the GDP on military expenditures and invade
>> - China, killing as many of them as we can! We should crush, kill and
>> - destroy all of them!
>>
>>
>> You notice this person didn't say which "Lord" hw wished to "do battle for"?
>>
>>
>> Can we say "Saaaaayyy-tuuuuuun"?
>>
>> He certainly is not a Christian.
>
>You also notice that he chose to post to a really strange collection
>of newsgroups? I'm reading this from rec.arts.sf.written; I think he
>should tell us which science fiction novels best reflect his ideas.
>(Maybe he'd like China Mountain Zhang, or State of the Art, or Ethan
>of Athos.)
Oh, thats because I find that in rec.arts.sf.written there are:
Robert A. Templeton
Dege) wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:36:56 GMT, Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 01:45:32 GMT, jd...@jdege.visi.com (Jeffrey C.
>>Dege) wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
>>>>as a normal state?
>>>
>>>Well, yes. Considering the alternatives.
>>
>>Obviously, you want to preserve your chances to score with other
>>men... You commie pinko fuck.
>
>Actually, I'm a libertarian.
>
>Why do you find the idea of homoerotic so repulsive? I mean, the idea
>of making love to another man rather unexciting. The sight of another
>man, naked, fills me with, well, nothing, really.
I don't find anything repulsive about it. It's the politics of most
gays that I don't like. They're universailly communists or fellow
travellers.
Robert A. Templeton
wrote:
>"Robert A. Templeton" wrote:
>
>> We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
>> of society we want to live in;
>
>Is it a full moon or something? The number of crank posts seems to have
>suddenly shot through the rood.
Not a crank post, a post from a sincere and rational individual who
wants to see certian changes made.
Robert A. Templeton
wrote:
>>
>> Go ahead you pot-smoking jackass. I'll fucking wipe the floor with
>> your queer ass any fucking day.
>
>
That does not surprise me. Given that you are obviously a socialist.
Robert A. Templeton
<fama...@casema.net> wrote:
>> Go ahead you pot-smoking jackass. I'll fucking wipe the floor with
>> your queer ass any fucking day.
>
>In your dreams boy, only in your dreams! Or better in your nightmares. Just
>think of this: I'm a married man, LEGALLY married with another man.
Legally married? I doubt that. Unless you live in a freak nation.
So self-respecting nation would allow such a degredation of the
sancitity of marrige. (Well, perhaps one of the freak European
nations).
Robert A. Templeton
Christian) wrote:
>You notice this person didn't say which "Lord" hw wished to "do battle for"?
>
>
>Can we say "Saaaaayyy-tuuuuuun"?
>
>He certainly is not a Christian.
I certianlly am. It's you who isn't a Christian. I think that, in
your heart, you know why,
<< * BenjoŠ * >>
Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:383202cc.1093152@news...
Sweetie, I don't think that The Netherlands and other European
countries where a gay marriage is legally possible are freak nations.
Maybe we are just a bit more civilised, maybe we just like tolerance a
bit more.
And let me tell you, with the next change of the law we are allowed
to adopt children as well. Pleasant dreams!
--
"PURITANISM - the haunting fear that someone, somewhere may be happy."
H.L. Mencken
[Message by BenjoŠ]
Andy Henderson
says...
> On Mon, 15 Nov 1999 21:55:00 -0800, Eric Berge <e_db...@ibm.net>
> wrote:
>
> >I would like to point out at this juncture that without some initial
> >forking, there can be no subsequent breeding.
>
> <chuckle>
>
> Well if this troll becomes a major headache, just refer to his header
> field that reads:
>
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
>
> Deborah
>
Why not just ignore his post... Sheesh, look at the response he gets,
and then sure as the sun rises, someone suggests censoring him...
--
A J Henderson
(remove: "or.near." to email)
Jeffrey C. Dege
There is no room in Christianity for bigotry and hate.
He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in
darkness even until now.
He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is
none occassion of stumbling in him.
But he that hateth his brother is in darkness, and walketh in
the darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because that
darkness hath blinded his eyes.
I John, 1:9-11
--
.sig under construction
c...@yahoo.com
>The Patriot <worl...@home.com> wrote in message
>news:3830a598.474265@news...
>> On Sun, 14 Nov 1999 23:03:21 -0400, "Doogie" <temp...@usa.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
snip
>hmmmmm.... well, i can now add 'commie piece of trash' to the list of names
>i've been called by people on usenet who don't like/agree with what I'm
>saying... what with 'left wing loon' and 'right wing crazy' all i need now
>are 'tree hugging hippy' and 'fascist' and i've got bingo!
Yer nothing more then a tree hugging eco fascist hippy
terrorist....hehehe..there you go, now your list is complete. :-)
But on a more serious note.....good reply to the nutter.......A few
things that buddy boy should think about.
1) When China was invaded by Japan it had a number of major problems
to contend with a) an on-going civil war between the Nationalist and
Communist, this divided what forces China could bring to bear against
the Japanese.
2) Japan was a major technological power of the time while the Chinese
were still coming out from centuries of feudal type culture, its
technology was no where on par with Japan. Also China had suffered
decades of occupation, division and subjegation by the major powers of
the late 19th and early 20th century, the US included. It had no
industry or infrastructure to support a modern war.
3) The on-going civil war aside, many of Chinas regions and forces
were under the control of local warlords. This left the Chinese
ununified and unable to bring to bear the full weight of its varied
forces in a consentrated effort. Many of these warlords had agendas
of their own that ran contrary to the nation.
4) With all this going against China, it still inflicted more
causalties against the Japanese then the combined total of all the
wester forces.
5) Korea, when the Chinese attacked in support of the North Korean and
in direct response to a very real threat from the US/UN force under
McArthur, it pushed the US/UN force back and almost out of Korea.
Even with superiour technology and overwhelming air superiority, the
US/UN forces could only hold them back to a draw. And China was able
to do even though they had just finished fighting a long and bloody
civil war.
6) This was China's situation some fifty years ago. Today China is no
longer a technological backwater. Its forces are well equipped and
armed. Their numbers are greater then the west could ever hope for.
And more to the point, they will be will and able to absorb higher
causalty rates then any western nation. Also more importantly, they
are no longer a divided people and will come together even more so if
the US attacks.
7) If such a situation like the nutter hopes for ever happened, the US
would find itself branded an outlaw nation and standing on its own.
It would be facing not only the armies and nukes of it's current
"enemies" or former enemies, but also those of it's current allies.
Countries such as England and France both major nuclear powers in
their own right could not nor would not allow the US to act in such a
manner. They would most likely side with China and throw their nukes
in with Russia, China, North Korea (if they do have any)
8) End result, bend over mankind and kiss your hairy arse good bye.
cms
>-Doogie
Steve Taylor
> I don't find anything repulsive about it. It's the politics of most
> gays that I don't like. They're universailly communists or fellow
> travellers.
J. Edgar Hoover, for instance.
Steve
Wes Moxam
Uh, I don't know of any rational people who would suggest that (and I
quote)
" We should crush and kill everything that isn't American (Canadian)!
We should spend 50% of the GDP on military expenditures and invade
China, killing as many of them as we can! We should crush, kill and
destroy all of them!"
You have my vote to win the Usenet Kook of the month award.
--
Wes Moxam
http://www.scs.ryerson.ca/wmoxam
http://yi.org/rgds
Henry
>
> On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:11:39 +1100, Steve Taylor <st...@afs.net.au>
> wrote:
>
> >"Robert A. Templeton" wrote:
> >
> >> We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
> >> of society we want to live in;
> >
> >Is it a full moon or something? The number of crank posts seems to have
> >suddenly shot through the rood.
>
> Not a crank post, a post from a sincere and rational individual who
> wants to see certian changes made.
If you are rational why are they confining people like you to mental
institutions?
Dennis Higbee
: On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:11:39 +1100, Steve Taylor <st...@afs.net.au>
: wrote:
: >"Robert A. Templeton" wrote:
: >
: >> We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
: >> of society we want to live in;
: >
: >Is it a full moon or something? The number of crank posts seems to have
: >suddenly shot through the rood.
: Not a crank post, a post from a sincere and rational individual who
: wants to see certian changes made.
Sincere, yes. Rational, no. Sounds like a crank to me.
--
Dennis Higbee | "Ain't it funny that they all fire the
bn...@li.net | pistol at the wrong end of the race."
http://www.li.net/~bnook/ | -P. Townshend
Patrick L. Humphrey
>On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:11:39 +1100, Steve Taylor <st...@afs.net.au>
>wrote:
>>"Robert A. Templeton" wrote:
>>> We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
>>> of society we want to live in;
>>Is it a full moon or something? The number of crank posts seems to have
>>suddenly shot through the rood.
>Not a crank post, a post from a sincere and rational individual who
>wants to see certian changes made.
Sincere? Possibly. Rational? I don't think anyone advocating that we
destroy everything that ISN'T American qualifies to be called rational.
Welcome to my killfile, kook.
*plonk*
--PLH, so many idiots, so few meteors
Doogie
news:5jrY3.63692$it.15...@news2.rdc1.on.home.com...
<snip>
>
> You have my vote to win the Usenet Kook of the month award.
>
for more proof, go to alt.politics and read the one he wrote a couple of
days ago under the name 'The Patriot', entitled 'General War Plan, China
(Destroy The Chinese Nation!)' he's started ignoring my posts for some
reason... maybe because i gave a rational explanation of what his ideas
would result in....
-Doogie
Rainbow Christian
Magnar Kj|nn|y) wrote:
- In article <80s1mm$pj0$1...@malakbel.unb.ca>,
- Doogie <temp...@usa.nospam.net> wrote:
- >Rainbow Christian <gsp...@nohate.poboxes.com> wrote in message
- >news:gspmcc-1611...@1cust121.tnt50.chi5.da.uu.net...
- >>
- >> Can we say "Saaaaayyy-tuuuuuun"?
- >>
- >> He certainly is not a Christian.
- >
- >yah, i noticed that one too..... wonder if he can make his head do a 360,
- >i'd pay to actually see that....
-
- Hey, he's not one of ours. If you want him, you can keep him; any
- messes he makes are yours to clean up.
-
-
OOOPPPS!!!
I'm sorry.....
I keep foreting the CoS folks are pretty reasonable folks (even if we do
disagree)/
- --
- Leif Kj{\o}nn{\o}y || www.pvv.org/~leifmk || Math geek and gamer
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
- "Such is life upon the isle of torment and woe.
- One day good, one day bad. And some days even hope." (MDB)
--
Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/Heights/1734
-
Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true. whatever is noble, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable - if anything is excellent or praiseworthy - think about such things. Philippiams 4:8
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.ufmcc.com
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
Rodney Smelser
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 04:16:48 +0100, "<< * Benjo© * >>"
> <fama...@casema.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >news:3830c3dc.6065559@news...
> >> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:05:57 GMT, ricj...@cgocable.net (Rick Jones)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A.
> >> >Templeton) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
> >> >>of society we want to live in;
> >> >>
> >> >>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
> >> >>as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
> >> >>pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
> >> >
> >> >Woo hoo!
> >>
> >> I'm glad to see that you support degenercy. If there were any justice
> >> in this world you would be killed for you faggotry.
> >
> >I would say: just come and visit us in The Netherlands so we can
> >kick some American ass.
> >--
>
> Go ahead you pot-smoking jackass. I'll fucking wipe the floor with
> your queer ass any fucking day.
Hello, Robert.
First of all, let me say that I find the above boast rather unbelievable. I
think that if you were the type who could use force successfully, that is what
you would be doing. Instead of sitting in front of your computer calling gays
and others names, you would be assualting them in bars and on the streets.
But enough of that. Perhaps I can take this opportunity to ask you a couple
of quick questions.
First of all, how do you feel about the prison sentences given out in a trial
in Surrey, BC, yesterday, in which 5 young men were sentenced to 12 to 15
years for beating an elderly Sikh man to death at the temple where he
volunteered as a caretaker? The judge applied the criminal code provisions
that allow for a greater sentence where hatred is a factor in the offence. Do
you think that is appropriate?
And tell me, do you support the Reform Party, and if so, why not link to their
website in your postings, you know, as a kind of public service?
Yours truly,
Rod Smelser
GOD's country
You're a "smart" person.
Louann Miller
Templeton) wrote:
>Oh, thats because I find that in rec.arts.sf.written there are:
>
>a) A lot of communists and other leftists
>b) the Feudalist
Your definitions of "communists and other leftists" are noted.
Rick Jones
Templeton) wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:05:57 GMT, ricj...@cgocable.net (Rick Jones)
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A.
>>Templeton) wrote:
>>
>>>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
>>>of society we want to live in;
>>>
>>>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
>>>as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
>>>pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
>>
>>Woo hoo!
>
>I'm glad to see that you support degenercy. If there were any justice
>in this world you would be killed for you faggotry.
I prefer depraved, dirty sex with members of the opposite sex -
preferably females of different cultures who are pacifists and
pro-choice. And I'll even do a socialist or two.
stout
Man! what a load of crap! This some of the funniest writing I have ever read
anywhere. America to wipe out the world or Canada to wipe out the world.
Once done where would we find the menials to do the work nobody else will
do? God, the thought of picking up garbage or working long hours at a seven
eleven is enough to scare anyone. Who would run the Chinese restaurants? I
trust the person I am replying to is a grand comedian. If not... someone
needs to change their medication.
Steve Taylor
>>Oh, thats because I find that in rec.arts.sf.written there are:
>>a) A lot of communists and other leftists
>>b) the Feudalist
> Your definitions of "communists and other leftists" are noted.
I imagine he was thinking of Pete McCutcheon and Jordan Bassior.
So what's the verdict: Is he he some pathetic dweed who's trolling or is
he a nutter?
S.
sands
stout wrote in message ...
The problem with it being a parody is that it wasn't very well written.
Essentially, it was just a troll, and a poorly written one, at that. I'd
like to think that parody in rasfw would be better executed.
I agree that I would never want to eat Chinese food made by an American or
Canadian, however.
Sands
The Expatriate
He's a fucking lunatic and an embarrassment to Americans everywhere. I only
hope he seeks the professional help he needs, and soon.
Rainbow Christian
<sgr...@earthcafe.com> wrote:
- stout wrote in message ...
- >
- >Man! what a load of crap! This some of the funniest writing I have ever
- read
- >anywhere. America to wipe out the world or Canada to wipe out the world.
- >Once done where would we find the menials to do the work nobody else will
- >do? God, the thought of picking up garbage or working long hours at a seven
- >eleven is enough to scare anyone. Who would run the Chinese restaurants? I
- >trust the person I am replying to is a grand comedian. If not... someone
- >needs to change their medication.
-
-
- The problem with it being a parody is that it wasn't very well written.
- Essentially, it was just a troll, and a poorly written one, at that. I'd
- like to think that parody in rasfw would be better executed.
-
- I agree that I would never want to eat Chinese food made by an American or
- Canadian, however.
-
- Sands
What really tastes awful is Meixcan food made by New Englanders!!!
(Lots of folks think Taco Bell is "real" Mexican cuisine!!!)
FrankML
>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:12:49 +0100, "<< * Benjo© * >>"
><fama...@casema.net> wrote:
>
>>I guess this is a joke. Otherwise you really have to commit
>>yourself to a mental hospital. Or are you in need of a job,
>>the new shitler?
>
>No, you stupid fuck. This is real. But you don't care since you
>obviously a cocaine addicted queer.
Ohhhh. It is a joke then! Name-calling is not something to be taken
seriously - along with armchair psychology. That's a good
fundamentalist, now run along and don't forget your meds.
Frank
-----
Doubt? It doesn't frighten me.
Richard Feynman
FrankML
Templeton) wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:11:39 +1100, Steve Taylor <st...@afs.net.au>
>wrote:
>
>>"Robert A. Templeton" wrote:
>>
>>> We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
>>> of society we want to live in;
>>
>>Is it a full moon or something? The number of crank posts seems to have
>>suddenly shot through the rood.
>
>Not a crank post, a post from a sincere and rational individual who
>wants to see certian changes made.
Sincere, yes. Rational? Lessee...name-calling, armchair psychology,
bitter blind hatred, willful ignorance....nope, definitely not
rational - but you can change if you really want to.
Christopher J. Henrich
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 09:19:49 -0600, gsp...@nohate.poboxes.com (Rainbow
> Christian) wrote:
> >You notice this person didn't say which "Lord" hw wished to "do battle for"?
> >
> >
> >Can we say "Saaaaayyy-tuuuuuun"?
> >
> >He certainly is not a Christian.
> >-
>
> I certianlly am. It's you who isn't a Christian. I think that, in
> your heart, you know why,
"In my Father's house are many mansions." And maybe some of them are being used
as loony bins.
But... somehow I don't think Templeton is for real. He tries to talk like
somebody who is polymorphically
bigoted, but it seems to me that his heart isn't in it.
Maybe I'm just a cock-eyed optimist.
Chris Henrich
fsmith
untraceable email addresses.
"Robert A. Templeton" wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 04:16:48 +0100, "<< * Benjo© * >>"
> <fama...@casema.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Robert A. Templeton <anti...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >news:3830c3dc.6065559@news...
> >> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 02:05:57 GMT, ricj...@cgocable.net (Rick Jones)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:05 GMT, anti...@nowhere.com (Robert A.
> >> >Templeton) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>We stand at a time in our civilization where we must decide what kind
> >> >>of society we want to live in;
> >> >>
> >> >>Do you want to live in a society where degenerecy is allowed to exist
> >> >>as a normal state? The evils of homosexuality, abortion, socialism,
> >> >>pacifism, and multiculturalism peremeate through our society.
> >> >
> >> >Woo hoo!
> >>
> >> I'm glad to see that you support degenercy. If there were any justice
> >> in this world you would be killed for you faggotry.
> >
> >I would say: just come and visit us in The Netherlands so we can
> >kick some American ass.
> >--
>
> Go ahead you pot-smoking jackass. I'll fucking wipe the floor with
> your queer ass any fucking day.
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is a great time.
Death
May I suggest that this post be flooded in groups such as alt.abortion and
similar groups?
fsmith <fsm...@bcpl.net> wrote in message news:3842213F...@bcpl.net...
Michael Caldwell
>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 03:37:49 GMT, Ron Nicholson <ba...@home.com>
>wrote:
>>> Go ahead you pot-smoking jackass. I'll fucking wipe the floor with
>>> your queer ass any fucking day.
>>You sound so butch. Luckily I like my men that way.
>That does not surprise me. Given that you are obviously a socialist.
I thought it was their women that the socialists liked butch....
(Butch and long sighted, to judge by the pictures of them staring
resolutely at the horizon).
--
Brodsky
> > >Seeing the condition of Kosovo, Iraq and Vietnam I dont think China
> > >would appreciate that type of "victory".
> >
> > I'm sorry to tell you, but we won all of those wars, you commie.
Ha! Yeah, real glory to the U.S.A. Good guys vs. bad guys, and we always win.
Wait, here comes a stupid, derogatory insult based on blind patriotism... Nice
victories, you ultra-nationalist, militant fascist!
Gador
wrote:
>So what's the verdict: Is he he some pathetic dweed who's trolling or is
>he a nutter?
Who cares?