Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

A most unusual situation

0 views
Skip to first unread message

J. Hass

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
where do they go from here??
seems to be a lot of enemies for this organization --
...and it's self inflicted -

j.h.


Verminthox

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
I'M ALL OVER THEIR SH*T . BEWARE !

gerry armstrong

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:09:41 -0800, "J. Hass" <timeb...@hass.net>
wrote:

>where do they go from here??

Pickets, letters to editors, meetings, court cases, articles, books,
web sites, connections, bright ideas, media, government, planning,
offenses and defenses. Discipline is a good thing to have.

>seems to be a lot of enemies for this organization --
>...and it's self inflicted -

Ultimately it is, as even the $cientologists' tech says. But truth
contradicts the more "senior" law that any criticism of $cientology
equals crimes.

$cientologists' refusal to acknowledge contradictions, however, makes
them also a disciplined force completely accepting of their
domination. This disciplined force is used by the leaders of
$cientology for malevolent and corrupt purposes.

As soon as a $cientologist is able to acknowledge contradictions in
$cientology he begins to shake off the domination. Becoming able to
criticize he becomes able look at the tech critically. Then he can see
what is right in what Hubbard wrote, and what is a lie.

Hubbard was right, for example, when he said that $cientology pulls in
its enemies, that its wounds are self-inflicted. And he lied when he
said that people who criticize $cientology have crimes. He dominated
$cientologists with the insane idea that this lie was senior to the
truth.

When $cientologists all are free to speak about $cientology, then our
job will be done.

(c) Gerry Armstrong

>
>j.h.
>
>
>
>
>


Timebandit

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
they're still using the same old tricks.. you go to their website,
scientology.org and you can take that 'test' they offer
'no obligation' but you have to pick up the results at
a 'local center'.. are they really this stupid!!!???
i can't find any real intelligence and the idiots running
it are not mysterious at all.. it surprized me how
their policies and traps are still the same... what
a spaced out organization.. it's an aberation!!!
that's their favorite word --

damn, i want to bring them down now.. time to take action.

j.h.


J. Hass <timeb...@hass.net> wrote in message
news:7ct0n8$bfl$1...@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net...


>where do they go from here??

>seems to be a lot of enemies for this organization --
>...and it's self inflicted -
>

>j.h.
>
>
>
>
>


Timebandit

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
yeah, i'm starting to consider it myself.. the thing is i can
do great damage and it will hurt a lot of people..
i'm doing an 'exploritory' review on it as once i start
there's no turning back.. i've got access to the
masses via my background...
stay tuned.. more damage to be surely done
to this organization.. they will 'get to know me...' very soon!

j.h.


Verminthox <vermi...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:19990319152541...@ng-fs1.aol.com...

Mike O'Connor

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
In article <7cuhti$jm9$1...@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net>, "Timebandit"
<timeb...@hass.net> wrote:

Hey boys, remember Paulette Cooper? I do. What hoary old tactics you guys
are STUCK on.

--
Mike O'Connor - lep...@panix.com
<http://www.panix.com/~lepton/>

Bernie

unread,
Mar 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/21/99
to
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:09:41 -0800 "J. Hass"
<timeb...@hass.net> wrote:

>where do they go from here??
>seems to be a lot of enemies for this organization --

Hatred spreads faster than love.

Bernie
http://welcome.to/ars
http://www.bernie.us-inc.com

Bernie

unread,
Mar 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/21/99
to
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999 14:09:19 -0800 "Timebandit"
<timeb...@hass.net> wrote:

>yeah, i'm starting to consider it myself.. the thing is i can
>do great damage and it will hurt a lot of people..
>i'm doing an 'exploritory' review on it as once i start
>there's no turning back.. i've got access to the
>masses via my background...
>stay tuned.. more damage to be surely done
>to this organization.. they will 'get to know me...' very soon!

We wait and watch.

Ethan

unread,
Mar 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/21/99
to
Bernie wrote:


>Hatred spreads faster than love.

Speak for yourself. I'm only here because I care about my fellow
human being(s).

--
"You have to scrape bottom to appreciate life and start living
again." --Frank Sinatra

Ethan

gerry armstrong

unread,
Mar 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/21/99
to
On Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:12:31 GMT, ma...@bernie.us-inc.com (Bernie)
wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:09:41 -0800 "J. Hass"
><timeb...@hass.net> wrote:
>
>>where do they go from here??
>>seems to be a lot of enemies for this organization --
>

>Hatred spreads faster than love.

Actually, love is already completely spread and goes nowhere. Hatred
is a form of illusion which appears to blot out or destroy love. But
hatred is just illusion, and when seen through it will be found that
love is right there, having gone nowhere. Because it has gone nowhere,
it can appear, I suppose, that it spreads slowly.

That's why the hate group of $cientology can never succeed. All the
illusions in the world, the lies, the threats, the hatred, cannot
destroy love. When $cientology and $cientologists cease lying,
threatening and hating, it will be seen that nothing happened. Their
lies, threats and hatred are without effect. Just like any wog's lies,
threats and hatred.

With the $cientologists, however, lies, threats and hatred have been
institutionalized. This makes them organized to hurt people, which of
course is a great evil. The good news to $cientology is that the
organization can be transformed, just as an individual can be
transformed. Thus we, the critics, continue on. $cientology's
transformation from a hate organization to a loving organization is
worth hanging around for.

(c) Gerry Armstrong

0 new messages