Grady's "settlement"
gerry armstrong
eventful and memorable relationship between Scientology and Grady
Ward. An acknowledgment of years of courage, talent, battle skills,
wit and wisdom.
Congratulations, Grady. I look forward to meeting you at long last and
discussing our interlocked lives and litigations.
I trust you will be amenable to testifying when I have the opportunity
to oppose the order finding me in contempt of court for responding to
your subpoena duces tecum in January, 1997.
Grady must be a mere phone call away from the highest management of
$cientology for the rest of his life for a paltry $200.00 per month.
And with all of his rights (plus the very same courage, talents and so
forth) intact. There is no need to ever quote Hubbard ever again;
whereas Grady's words will be sought because they will be seen to have
value, in proof of which fact the cult of greed has already done so
much to silence them.
Grady will very possibly end up with being able to auction away his
$200 per month relationship for an amount perhaps even beyond the
"Judgment's" extremely memorable $3,000,000 figure.
But until that happens, let us examine a universal call for the
condemnation and invalidation of Scientology's leaders' policy and
practice of procuring and becoming "beneficiaries" to "contracts" and
"judgments" of psychological slavery and physical peonage. Scientology
and its lawyers concoct these slavery contracts in cruelty and enforce
them in cruelty extended through time. They are licenses to hunt
humans.
That everything works together for good doen't mean working to make it
bad makes it any better.
We call on Scientology one more time to let all people go. Release
every person of whatever gender, age, race, religion, nation,
affiliation or positn; whereas Grady's words will be sought because
they will be seen to have value, in proof of which fact the cult of
greed has already done so much to silence them.
Grady will very possibly end up with being able
wgert
armstrong) wrote:
>This is a memorable document reflecting a memorable event in an
...(snip)...
This was a post by Gery Armstrong, a man totally obsessed with hate.
His solution to the obsession, was that he involved himself in a
scheme which was aimed at both seizing Church assets and total
church control.
He was caught in this in the mid-1980's in a police sanctioned
investigation, which found that he was conspiring to infiltrate the
Church and plant forged documents and have the Church raided.
The whole scheme involved money -- several million dollars. To help
forward that scheme, he attempted to recruit others who would forward
allegations damaging to the Church.
That there was no substance behind his scheme became rather evident
when he was asked "How does one prove those allegations". His simple
response and strategy was: "You don't have to prove a god damn thing!
You don't have to prove ****! You just allege it!"
Having thus lost all credibility as a so-called "informer" against the
Church, Armstrong's behaviour grew more bizarre.
First there was his campaign to destroy all money in the world. For
that occasion he had himself photographed naked, and embracing a
globe.
Then came his letter to Saddam Hussein, offering himself up to end
the war.
"The writer of this letter hereby volunteers to replace all your
hostages... My only claim to fame my be that I am the least known
philosopher in America... If our side failed to perform any part of
the agreement reached with you I would be executed. I would be
available for torturde if you desired... such and execution might
provide sufficient satisfaction to make war uncessary. I have
plenty of lawyers to work out the details."
A court recently ordered him to pay $650,000 for his violations.
After violating a further court order, he was held in contempt of
court and sentenced to jail.
To avoid jail, he fled the U.S. and is now in Canada.
wgert
For further information visit:
Deana Marie Holmes
>Then came his letter to Saddam Hussein, offering himself up to end
>the war.
wgert, have you ever considered that Gerry Armstrong truly believes
what he does? Gerry says he's a Christian, and while you might think
this is NUTS, he's only doing what his Lord did before him, which is
to offer himself as a sacrifice to save the lives of many.
But then again, you wouldn't understand that. Scientology is not
about selfless sacrifice, it's about getting and gaining.
Deana Marie Holmes
The Few, The Proud, The Banned (2x + 1 ISP on Scientology ban list)
$cientology: Sponsor Windows84: "Where CAN'T you go today?
mir...@xmission.com
Xapped
> ...(snip)...
>
> This was a post by Gery Armstrong, a man totally obsessed with hate.
Scientology's blubber-button get pushed every time Gerry Armstrong is
mentioned. To understand more completely, look up "Bare-Faced Messiah" on
the internet. It is a book written by Russell Miller which can be
downloaded for free.
Gerry Armstrong aided Mr. Miller with his research which incontrovertibly
exposed L. Ron Hubbard as a charlatan.
Joe Xapped German Scientology News http://cisar.org
Tax cults. Cults are not "new religious movements." They are companies
which engage in the commerce of addictive psychological therapy and teach
that enslavement is necessary to one's own personal salvation.
wgert
Holmes) wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Sep 1998 00:28:24 GMT, wg...@loop.com (wgert) wrote:
>
>>Then came his letter to Saddam Hussein, offering himself up to end
>>the war.
>
>wgert, have you ever considered that Gerry Armstrong truly believes
>what he does? Gerry says he's a Christian, and while you might think
>this is NUTS, he's only doing what his Lord did before him, which is
>to offer himself as a sacrifice to save the lives of many.
>
>But then again, you wouldn't understand that. Scientology is not
>about selfless sacrifice, it's about getting and gaining.
>
>
>Deana Marie Holmes
That could be understood if it were really a selfless sacrifice as
you name - but it is not. It is solely about alleging things no
matter what the truth is. Stacy acts out a similar role but is
motivated purely and solely by money. She will do *anything*
to never be poor again.
wgert
wgert
armstrong) wrote:
>Grady will very possibly end up with being able
Grady being able is probably what everyone on ars
hopes to see one day.
wgert
Tommy
Sure - and you will do *anything* to never be sane again.
Tommy
--
'I'm drinking lots of rum and popping pinks and greys.'
-- Hubbard, 1967 letter to his wife submitted to the court in the
Armstrong
case, authenticity unchallenged by LRH/CoS lawyers
Deana Marie Holmes
>That could be understood if it were really a selfless sacrifice as
>you name - but it is not. It is solely about alleging things no
>matter what the truth is. Stacy acts out a similar role but is
>motivated purely and solely by money. She will do *anything*
>to never be poor again.
You didn't confront my statement.
Here it is again. Gerry Armstrong offered himself as a hostage to
Saddam Hussein because it is his Christian belief to do so. In fact,
even though I consider such actions foolhardy, he believes he is
following in the footsteps of his Lord when he does this.
Now what is so hard to understand about this? Gerry isn't the first
person to do such a thing, nor is he the last. Or is it just
irritation with the fact that a Church of Scientology "apostate" could
find spiritual meaning in some other religious path?
Beverly
> mir...@newsguy.com (Deana Marie Holmes) wrote:
> >wgert, have you ever considered that Gerry Armstrong truly believes
> >what he does? Gerry says he's a Christian, and while you might think
> >this is NUTS, he's only doing what his Lord did before him, which is
> >to offer himself as a sacrifice to save the lives of many.
> >But then again, you wouldn't understand that. Scientology is not
> >about selfless sacrifice, it's about getting and gaining.
> That could be understood if it were really a selfless sacrifice as
> you name - but it is not. It is solely about alleging things no
> matter what the truth is.
Yet all you do is to attack Gerry personally rather than confront
his statements about the abuse of the Co$. When that is what is
being done, it is obvious in the readers mind that personal attacks
are done because you are unable to disprove what Gerry has said
about Co$.
Personal attacks may work in the Co$ (and with that other 2% of
the population <g>), but with sane and intelligent people capable
of seeing past the facade, it rather renders you the foolish
looking one.
> Stacy acts out a similar role but is motivated purely and solely
> by money.
Don't profess to know Stacy, you don't. I understand that you
can only see that money is a motivating factor to people as that
is what wo much of LRH tech and policy is about. I really mean
it when I say you (all of you) are merely a sad man. Only an
empty reflection of humanity, an image with no substance.
If only you had eyes to see.
> She will do *anything* to never be poor again.
Your attacks on Stacy are a reflection of the spiritual emesis
that is tantamount to those who adhere to the Co$ mind-set.
You only know "rich or poor" from a materialistic standpoint.
You (all of you) come across as a person that no matter how much
mammom you may surround yourself with, spiritually you are
poverty stricken.
Poor sad man.
Beverly