Dogs suck
HFW President & CEO
I had a dumb fuck dog try and bite me today! Dogs suck!
--
!!! MEOW MEOW -=*/> King Azzy I <\*=- MEOW MEOW !!!
AFK-MN Minister of Hospitality to the Were Community.
President, HFW ** HAIL HFW!!!
"I can flame anyway I choose too."
Bilbert in 6b0cn1$5...@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net
Aaron Martin
man that sucks, arent dogs shit
HFW President & CEO wrote in message ...
The Azzynator
In article <6clmss$bp8$1...@newsource.ihug.co.nz>, aaro...@ihug.co.nz
says...
> man that sucks, arent dogs shit
>
obe...@atcon.com
>HFW President & CEO wrote in message ...
>>I had a dumb fuck dog try and bite me today! Dogs suck!
. . . an hallmark of rascism is to tar and feather every member of a
group for the greatly exaggerated sins of one individual. I would
probably have bitten the idiot as well. . .which means the entire
human race is shit. . .which means these two mean spirited little
shits are also shit.
In my bleak, miserable 47 years of existence, I can count the
number of real human friends I've made from all I've met probably on
the fingers of two hands. However, just about ANY dog I've met was
almost immediately a trusting friend or soon became one.
You two losers need to re-examine your criteria for conferring
eternal damnation upon a species.
/ __ \ / /_ ___ _ __ ____ _ ___ ____
/ / / / / __ \/ _ \ | /| / // __ ` / / __ \ / __ /
/ /_/ / / /_/ / __/ |/ |/ // /_// / / / / / / /
\____/ /_.___/\___/|__/|__/ \__,_/ /_/ /_/
Mary Ann
HFW President & CEO wrote in message ...
>
>I had a dumb fuck dog try and bite me today! Dogs suck!
That sucks!
The first time I went to meet my mother-in-law, her dog bit me.
That really sucks! :)
Mary Ann
CASHP#28-96
CASHK#96-003
Friend of ALS
Scott Witherspoon
His Eminence wrote in message <34f9beaa....@news.alt.net>...
>On Sat, 21 Feb 1998 17:15:24 GMT, obe...@atcon.com wrote:
>
>Correct, the more you get to know a dog, the more you love it. How
>many people can you say that about? Cats are for people who didn't
>really want a pet in the first place. BTW, that's an honest opinion.
>I'm not just trolling all you damn cat owners!
I don't know about anybody else, but
those new Taco Bell commercials
, to me, are a little bit disturbing.
You know, with the little barking
Chihuahua dog? I don't know if they're
trying to imply that they're serving us
dogfood OR doggie tacos. I love
dogs so those commercials just really
creep me out.
>
>® Rick Arthur Mechling ®
>
>
The True Azzy
In article <6cn9gl$s...@news3.newsguy.com>, mar...@newsguy.com says...
>
> HFW President & CEO wrote in message ...
> >
> >I had a dumb fuck dog try and bite me today! Dogs suck!
>
>
>
> That sucks!
>
> The first time I went to meet my mother-in-law, her dog bit me.
>
> That really sucks! :)
>
Putt
The True Azzy wrote in message ...
>In article <6cn9gl$s...@news3.newsguy.com>, mar...@newsguy.com says...
>>
>> HFW President & CEO wrote in message ...
>> >
>> >I had a dumb fuck dog try and bite me today! Dogs suck!
>>
>>
>>
>> That sucks!
>>
>> The first time I went to meet my mother-in-law, her dog bit me.
>>
>> That really sucks! :)
>>
>Well at least your mother-in-law did not bite you!
*meow*
Mom says she is happy the ladee didnot bite her.
Ladees are nice, but dawgs suk. It wasnot mom's fawlt. It was the
sucky dawg.
Every hoomin should buy a nice cat and feed him toona. *meow*
Putt
CASHK#96-003
Scott Witherspoon
Big John wrote in message <34f0527...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>Gone Korean, have they? 101 ways to wok your dog.
Jack 'N The Box has an even worse one. ...
'The Secret Jack Sauce' that they smear
on everything from their breakfast croissants
to their soggy sleaze-burgers.
http://home1.gte.net/money25/index.htm
>
>
>BJ
>CASHK #96-009 CASHP #64-96 FOA
>http://www.jbuchanan.demon.co.uk
Mary Ann
Hamlet
An avid cat lover and owner, I agree. There is nothing like a dog. I
love my cats and would not trade for many things but, a dog is a good
pet. Just think, a dog can tell if a person needs biting, makes ya
think, no?
His Eminence wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 1998 17:15:24 GMT, obe...@atcon.com wrote:
>
> Correct, the more you get to know a dog, the more you love it. How
> many people can you say that about? Cats are for people who didn't
> really want a pet in the first place. BTW, that's an honest opinion.
> I'm not just trolling all you damn cat owners!
> > In my bleak, miserable 47 years of existence, I can count the
> >number of real human friends I've made from all I've met probably on
> >the fingers of two hands. However, just about ANY dog I've met was
> >almost immediately a trusting friend or soon became one.
> > You two losers need to re-examine your criteria for conferring
> >eternal damnation upon a species.
> >
> >
> >
> > / __ \ / /_ ___ _ __ ____ _ ___ ____
> > / / / / / __ \/ _ \ | /| / // __ ` / / __ \ / __ /
> >/ /_/ / / /_/ / __/ |/ |/ // /_// / / / / / / /
> >\____/ /_.___/\___/|__/|__/ \__,_/ /_/ /_/
> >
> >
>
> ® Rick Arthur Mechling ®
>
--
Anthony V. Yuro II / CASHP 68-96
"Go Lemmings Go!"
Remove XX to e-mail
http://www.geocities.com/athens/parthenon/3529
c@.c
Yeah. Indeed they do.
Just got bitten by some stupid pitbull this afternoon. It remembered me
from closing a door on it a few days back when it ran at me all barking
and angry. Now I was just talking to someone when it suddenly decides
to gently 'punish me' by biting me in the upper leg. As if it thinks
it needs to play power-games with me. They're like army-people.
Next time I will shoot these types of dogs on sight I kid you not.
Dogs are for the weak:
for those who can't give love to their own species, those who can't protect
themselves, and those who need an outlet for their inferiority complexes.
How can anyone love an animal like that? They're ugly as hell,
they smell, they stink, they need to be fed expensive meat, they
bark at people that don't need to be barked at, they are stupid,
they have no ego, they like to be people's punching bags
(they are like robots if you think of it), and they're all
mass-breeded failures from some wolve-mutant species.
The world does not need dogs. Nature can do without them.
Life would suck less when there would be no dogs around.
And all of you that don't agree with this are weak or stupid.
Go look for love from someone your own kind and size.
Pets are for people with a handicap.
The Prof
c@.c@ wrote:
No snipping a'purpose.
You, sir, are polar. Generally, we all muddle about living our lives
without the benefit of such instruction as yours, but occasionally it
makes its way through to the hoi polloi. It did this time. We're
grateful.
You have the best writing style and the clearest thinking of anyone
with organic brain syndrome I've ever run across. Congratulations. I
hope I've given you some encouragement to reflect upon as you nibble
your bed rails.
The Prof
Doug
In article <34f143d5...@news.alt.net> you wrote:
: On Mon, 23 Feb 1998 03:59:25 GMT, GNO...@IX.NETCOM.COM (The Prof)
: wrote:
<mindless and infantile rant snipped in hte name of decency>
: A Pulitzer prize winner here! And just when I was looking for an
: example to prove my point, you come along! Thank you! Oh and thank
: the pit bull for me!
OTOH Prof.......... When you think about it, doesn't it seem odd that this
comes from someone who so obviously spends great deal of time screwing the
neighbors pooch?
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
wol...@primenet.com
"Oh bother," said Pooh,
"I think I shall come down now."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c@.
My (a)sexual girlfriend assured me that on 23 Feb 1998 06:21:01 -0700
Doug <wol...@primenet.com> smoothly tried to rape her mind
by semiperforating air thusly:
> In article <34f143d5...@news.alt.net> you wrote:
> : On Mon, 23 Feb 1998 03:59:25 GMT, GNO...@IX.NETCOM.COM (The Prof)
> : wrote:
>
> <mindless and infantile rant snipped in hte name of decency>
I wonder what someone like you is doing in this here group.
You should bud your dumb ass out of here, weak excuse for a human being.
Talk about ranting here, YOU are the one doing it, not me.
> OTOH Prof.......... When you think about it, doesn't it seem odd that this
> comes from someone who so obviously spends great deal of time screwing the
> neighbors pooch?
What is this? Some kind of try to humiliate someone who's obviously
way out of your league? Go beat your pet, Doug, go, go, kick the dog!
BTW: You don't know the first thing about me, dourk, you're most likely
even too stupid to grasp intelligence levels from this order.
Dogs as pets is the most overly luxurious invention in history of mankind.
By protecting your fluffy dog-yard, you only prove your stupidity more.
J
Tats
> >
> >>Yeah. Indeed they do.
> >>Just got bitten by some stupid pitbull this afternoon. It remembered me
> >>from closing a door on it a few days back when it ran at me all barking
> >>and angry. Now I was just talking to someone when it suddenly decides
> >>to gently 'punish me' by biting me in the upper leg. As if it thinks
> >>it needs to play power-games with me. They're like army-people.
> >>Next time I will shoot these types of dogs on sight I kid you not.
> >>
> >>Dogs are for the weak:
> >>for those who can't give love to their own species, those who can't protect
> >>themselves, and those who need an outlet for their inferiority complexes.
> >>
> >>How can anyone love an animal like that? They're ugly as hell,
> >>they smell, they stink, they need to be fed expensive meat, they
> >>bark at people that don't need to be barked at, they are stupid,
> >>they have no ego, they like to be people's punching bags
> >>(they are like robots if you think of it), and they're all
> >>mass-breeded failures from some wolve-mutant species.
> >>
> >>The world does not need dogs. Nature can do without them.
> >>Life would suck less when there would be no dogs around.
> >>
> >>And all of you that don't agree with this are weak or stupid.
> >>Go look for love from someone your own kind and size.
> >>Pets are for people with a handicap.
> >
> example to prove my point, you come along! Thank you! Oh and thank
> the pit bull for me!
Aw...c'mon guy's .... lets have a little understanding here. Yet .... I
wonder what people say when they see this persons face not to mention
the obvious body odor problem. Besides.... what would life be without
people like this out there to give you some ammo to go off?
Tats.
Tats
c@., c@. wrote:
>
> My (a)sexual girlfriend assured me that on 23 Feb 1998 06:21:01 -0700
> Doug <wol...@primenet.com> smoothly tried to rape her mind
> by semiperforating air thusly:
>
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't her being Asexual mean she doesn't
need you around??
> > In article <34f143d5...@news.alt.net> you wrote:
> > : On Mon, 23 Feb 1998 03:59:25 GMT, GNO...@IX.NETCOM.COM (The Prof)
> > : wrote:
> >
> > <mindless and infantile rant snipped in hte name of decency>
Oh... I see. hte = the.
>
> I wonder what someone like you is doing in this here group.
> You should bud your dumb ass out of here, weak excuse for a human being.
> Talk about ranting here, YOU are the one doing it, not me.
>
> > OTOH Prof.......... When you think about it, doesn't it seem odd that this
> > comes from someone who so obviously spends great deal of time screwing the
> > neighbors pooch?
>
> What is this? Some kind of try to humiliate someone who's obviously
> way out of your league? Go beat your pet, Doug, go, go, kick the dog!
Why is that obvious? He's not as narrow-minded as yourself?
>
> BTW: You don't know the first thing about me, dourk,
(dourk???)
you're most likely
> even too stupid to grasp intelligence levels from this order.
> Dogs as pets is
Dog as pets is???? You were talking about intelligence levels??
the most overly luxurious invention in history of mankind.
> By protecting your fluffy dog-yard, you only prove your stupidity more.
>
> J
Ohh...yeah...I'm convinced.
Tats.
Mary Ann
Big John wrote in message <34f7ecb4...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>Don't get me wrong about dogs, though. Although I wouldn't have one, I
>do like well behaved examples. However, and I know you'll disagree
>zealously on this matter, I detest small yappy dogs. Yorkshire This is
>just a matter of personal taste, and I wouldn't criticise anybody for
>having a penchant for chihuahuas ,for example.
Agreed, on all counts. *Most* dogs are really cool, but the little
nippy ones bug me.
I personally prefer *owning* cats over dogs because of the convenience.
You don't have to walk them, and if you go out of town for a few days
you don't have to worry about it (although I try not to leave him
alone). And they're clean - none to little bathing needed.
Mary Ann
CASHP#28-96
CASHK#96-003
Friend of ALS
>
Mary Ann
c@.c@ wrote in message <3505225b...@news.xs4all.nl>...
>You people don't get it yet?
>
>Let me explain it to you wussies.
>OK, so here I am, just living my life, minding my own business,
>not bothering anyone with what I'm doing. If anything, only doing
>good things for this world and the people in it. I'm no criminal,
>not a bad guy to anyone (in real life), I don't go around hitting
>or stabbing people for no reason. Basically, my parents have not
>much to be ashamed of. I'm handsome, generous, intelligent, articulate
>and getting by ok for someone that knows how much life can suck.
>
>But then...
>
>All goes fine, until some animal all of a sudden appears,
>it yells out strange loud noises in my direction
>- for no reason whatsoever -, it has no control over
>what it does, acting as if it has one sick lunatic mind.
>All is good, till that animal (named a 'dog') needs to just go
>and decide it doesn't like me - for no reason whatsoever -
>All is well, up to the moment that out of nowhere yet one
>more 'dog' thinks it needs to try and overpower me or something.
>It needs to threaten me with it's appearance. And believe me,
>I'm not scared of any animal that size, I couldn't care less.
>I can kick them so hard they will stop barking forever.
>But still, they need to be all over this stupid world,
>because some idiots think they need them for something,
>because dourks think they know "love" when they're only
>getting it from dogs.
>"Oh I know my dog so well" this and that, and "oh brave doggy,
>you listen to me don't you?" this and that. "Oh look, it can
>do tricks" pff, really, people! Wake up! Go get civilized!
>
>Kick the damn dogs OUT of this world. Very few people really need
>them to survive. All dogs I've encountered in life have some kind
>of multiple-personality syndrome; you just can't count on them.
>But the difference with cats is; they need to bother you with
>their problems, cats don't. Cats mind their own business,
>and therefore always like me instantly. They feel it.
>They feel my hatred towards that stupid arrogant
>other species used as a pet: The Dog.
>
>So, there you have it. Go beat that logic. You may try,
>you may even try hard, but you won't succeed: Dogs suck.
>
>J
Well shit. I can't dispute a damn thing he said.
Ah, just kidding... :)
Well dogs are cute and stuff. People that would want to hurt them suck.
Also, I think you can count on a dog much more reliably than you can
most other humans.
Seems that way to me anyhow.
Mary Ann
P.S. Oh, I didn't agree with the "wussies" part though. HEY - that
wasn't nice.
P.S. Again: And I think it sounds a lot like G.
Jas
c@.c@ wrote:
>
> You people don't get it yet?
>
> Let me explain it to you wussies.
> OK, so here I am, just living my life, minding my own business,
> not bothering anyone with what I'm doing. If anything, only doing
> good things for this world and the people in it. I'm no criminal,
> not a bad guy to anyone (in real life), I don't go around hitting
> or stabbing people for no reason. Basically, my parents have not
> much to be ashamed of. I'm handsome, generous, intelligent, articulate
> and getting by ok for someone that knows how much life can suck.
(snipped misspelled, ungrammatical, inarticulate and unintelligible rant
that illustrates near-illiteracy better than anything else I've seen
recently)
Hmmm. Glad you put that last sentence in...I read the rest of your post
and, had you not assured me of your intelligence and articulation, you'd
have had me completely fooled.
Jas
--
Like to take a cement fix, be a standing cinema
Dress my friends up just for show
See them as they really are...
(To e-mail me, remove mudbugs from my address)
c@.c
You people don't get it yet?
Let me explain it to you wussies.
OK, so here I am, just living my life, minding my own business,
not bothering anyone with what I'm doing. If anything, only doing
good things for this world and the people in it. I'm no criminal,
not a bad guy to anyone (in real life), I don't go around hitting
or stabbing people for no reason. Basically, my parents have not
much to be ashamed of. I'm handsome, generous, intelligent, articulate
and getting by ok for someone that knows how much life can suck.
But then...
The Prof
c@. c@. wrote:
>My (a)sexual girlfriend assured me that on 23 Feb 1998 06:21:01 -0700
>Doug <wol...@primenet.com> smoothly tried to rape her mind
>by semiperforating air thusly:
>
>> In article <34f143d5...@news.alt.net> you wrote:
>> : On Mon, 23 Feb 1998 03:59:25 GMT, GNO...@IX.NETCOM.COM (The Prof)
>> : wrote:
>>
>> <mindless and infantile rant snipped in hte name of decency>
>
>I wonder what someone like you is doing in this here group.
>You should bud your dumb ass out of here, weak excuse for a human being.
>Talk about ranting here, YOU are the one doing it, not me.
>
>> OTOH Prof.......... When you think about it, doesn't it seem odd that this
>> comes from someone who so obviously spends great deal of time screwing the
>> neighbors pooch?
>
>What is this? Some kind of try to humiliate someone who's obviously
>way out of your league? Go beat your pet, Doug, go, go, kick the dog!
>
>BTW: You don't know the first thing about me, dourk, you're most likely
>even too stupid to grasp intelligence levels from this order.
>Dogs as pets is the most overly luxurious invention in history of mankind.
>By protecting your fluffy dog-yard, you only prove your stupidity more.
>
>J
Dourk?
The Prof
The Prof
ri...@Xusa.net (His Eminence) wrote:
>On Mon, 23 Feb 1998 19:03:05 GMT, c@. c@. wrote:
>
>>My (a)sexual girlfriend assured me that on 23 Feb 1998 06:21:01 -0700
>>Doug <wol...@primenet.com> smoothly tried to rape her mind
>>by semiperforating air thusly:
>>
>>> In article <34f143d5...@news.alt.net> you wrote:
>>> : On Mon, 23 Feb 1998 03:59:25 GMT, GNO...@IX.NETCOM.COM (The Prof)
>>> : wrote:
>>>
>>> <mindless and infantile rant snipped in hte name of decency>
>>
>>I wonder what someone like you is doing in this here group.
>>You should bud your dumb ass out of here, weak excuse for a human being.
>>Talk about ranting here, YOU are the one doing it, not me.
>That's nice! Makes one unintelligible post and tells Doug to get out
>of here!
>>
>>> OTOH Prof.......... When you think about it, doesn't it seem odd that this
>>> comes from someone who so obviously spends great deal of time screwing the
>>> neighbors pooch?
>>
>>What is this? Some kind of try to humiliate someone who's obviously
>>way out of your league?
>You got that right!
>> Go beat your pet, Doug, go, go, kick the dog!
>>
>>BTW: You don't know the first thing about me, dourk, you're most likely
>>even too stupid to grasp intelligence levels from this order.
>YEP! Me too! I'm barely able to figure out what the fuck your
>talking about.
>
>
>
>>Dogs as pets is the most overly luxurious invention in history of mankind.
>Wow? Someone save this sentence, (Mike). This must be an award
>winner for next year.
>
>
>>By protecting your fluffy dog-yard, you only prove your stupidity more.
>>
>>J
>
>New UK speak????? Binky, can you please translate?
Gareth? Is that Gareth?
The Prof
The Prof
c@.c@ wrote:
Dourk again. "I can kick them so hard they will stop barking forever.
Gareth?
The Prof
Tats
The fact is...we're (I'm) not bugging you and trying to convince you
that dogs don't suck. I'm not a dog person myself and couldn't care
less whether or not you kick one, pet one, or fuck one. That's not my
concern. Yes, I think they suck as pets too. Okay. BUT you were
calling all the dog owners (and ANY other pet owners for that matter)
weaker just because they like their pets. THAT is what I have a problem
with. I have 3 cats and 7 snakes as pets. Does that make me weak? I
think not. I'm no tough guy like yourself, but I can hold my own.
People may kick my ass once but they won't want to come back to do it
again. If you left it at the fact that they suck in your opinion and
why, then maybe you'd have gotten the reaction you wanted. Get it?
Tats.
Michael Hernandez
In article <34f4f92a...@news.xs4all.nl>, c@.c@ wrote:
>Dogs are for the weak:
>for those who can't give love to their own species, those who can't protect
>themselves, and those who need an outlet for their inferiority complexes.
You, sir, are an ass. I can assure you that I, and everyone else I've ever
known who has a pet (dog or otherwise) was perfectly capable of loving
humans who were deserving of that love, could protect themselves, and
didn't use pets as an outlet for their inferiority complexes. Some people
(read: most people) just like animals, damnit.
>How can anyone love an animal like that? They're ugly as hell,
Post your picture on here, if you really think you're qualified to judge
beauty; if your physical appearance resembles your attitude at all, I bet
you look like the rear end of a German shepherd.
>they smell, they stink, they need to be fed expensive meat,
So do many humans. What is your point?
>they bark at people that don't need to be barked at,
And they bark at (among other things) people who do need to be barked at.
For example, my parents' house was broken into a few months back. They got
a Rottweiler. No break-ins since. I hardly think it's a coincidence.
>they are stupid,
Not all dogs are. And again, so are many (if not most) humans. What's your
point?
>they have no ego,
And this is a *bad* thing? Ego (or the excess of it) is one of the worst
traits of humankind. It is the cause of arrogance, cruelty, coldness
towards man and to fellow creatures. Who's really better off: ego-less
animals, or humans who have a ridiculously inflated sense of
self-importance because of their huge egos?
>they like to be people's punching bags
Bullshit. Absolute bullshit. I have yet to see an animal who really *likes*
for humans to beat the crap out of them, or worse. They usually have no say
in the matter. By contrast, many humans *do* like to be hurt, physically
and/or mentally. And we're the more highly evolved species?
>(they are like robots if you think of it), and they're all
>mass-breeded failures from some wolve-mutant species.
And humans are mass-bred failures of an ape-mutant species. Big fucking deal.
>The world does not need dogs. Nature can do without them.
>Life would suck less when there would be no dogs around.
And yet again, the same holds true for humans.
>And all of you that don't agree with this are weak or stupid.
Aren't we modest?
>Go look for love from someone your own kind and size.
Who says we don't?
>Pets are for people with a handicap.
Yeah, hell of a handicap, too. It's called compassion. Affection. You might
want to try it sometime.
Sheesh, I've never in my entire life seen someone overreact so much to
being bitten by a fucking dog. You think that's a real problem? Get a grip,
halfwit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hernandez (a.k.a. Moonhawk) moon...@alt-life-sucks.org
FOA, CASHPie 1-95, CASHK #96-001H, FAWC(H)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"This one could turn Kathie Lee into an existentialist."
- Link magazine's Oct/Nov '95 Internet Guide, on alt.life.sucks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hernandez
In article <34f70252...@news.xs4all.nl>, c@. c@. wrote:
>My (a)sexual girlfriend assured me that on 23 Feb 1998 06:21:01 -0700
>Doug <wol...@primenet.com> smoothly tried to rape her mind
>by semiperforating air thusly:
What?!?!? asexual? semiperforating air? Do you even know what the hell
you're babbling about now?
>> In article <34f143d5...@news.alt.net> you wrote:
>> : On Mon, 23 Feb 1998 03:59:25 GMT, GNO...@IX.NETCOM.COM (The Prof)
>> : wrote:
>>
>> <mindless and infantile rant snipped in hte name of decency>
>
>I wonder what someone like you is doing in this here group.
He is a regular here. You are but a clueless newbie. Have some respect, dipshit.
Did you even read the FAQ?
>You should bud your dumb ass out of here, weak excuse for a human being.
Excuse me, but..."bud your dumb ass"? Please translate.
>Talk about ranting here, YOU are the one doing it, not me.
And your point is...?!? Read the fucking FAQ again, moron.
>> OTOH Prof.......... When you think about it, doesn't it seem odd that this
>> comes from someone who so obviously spends great deal of time screwing the
>> neighbors pooch?
>
>What is this? Some kind of try to humiliate someone who's obviously
>way out of your league?
Your "minor-league" status is the only thing you've proven up to this
point. Get a clue or go away before the a.l.s pros do a Harlem
Globetrotters routine on your ass.
>BTW: You don't know the first thing about me, dourk, you're most likely
>even too stupid to grasp intelligence levels from this order.
(ahem)
"dourk"?
"intelligence levels from this order"?
Oh. You don't (obviously) know the first thing about a.l.s'ers, so where do
you get off assuming anything about us and then whining about the same
treatment? Idiot.
>Dogs as pets is the most overly luxurious invention in history of mankind.
Really? More so than automobiles, TVs, air conditioning, etc. etc. etc.?
Dogs are the most overly luxurious invention in history? Give me a break.
Incidentally, men didn't *invent* dogs, you idiot. Made pets out of them,
perhaps, but I still fail to see (despite your flailing) what's wrong with
that.
>By protecting your fluffy dog-yard, you only prove your stupidity more.
"fluffy dog-yard"? Whatever. (lol)
By the way...how does it prove stupidity in anyone that they like dogs?
marshall
c@.c@ wrote in article <3505225b...@news.xs4all.nl>...
Dogs have a sixth sens about certain people ,I trust there instincts , they
are usualy right!
Michael Hernandez
In article <3505225b...@news.xs4all.nl>, c@.c@ wrote:
(Trim the headers, O a.l.s'ers; our village idiot here thinks he's clever.)
>You people don't get it yet?
Get what? You've had no point so far.
>Let me explain it to you wussies.
Die.
>OK, so here I am, just living my life, minding my own business,
>not bothering anyone with what I'm doing. If anything, only doing
>good things for this world and the people in it. I'm no criminal,
>not a bad guy to anyone (in real life), I don't go around hitting
>or stabbing people for no reason.
What? You think that's something special? That's normal behavior, dimwit.
That's how one *should* behave in this world. You don't deserve anything
special out of life for that.
>Basically, my parents have not
>much to be ashamed of. I'm handsome, generous, intelligent, articulate
...and modest...
>and getting by ok for someone that knows how much life can suck.
Well, congratulations.
>But then...
>
>All goes fine, until some animal all of a sudden appears,
>it yells out strange loud noises in my direction
>- for no reason whatsoever -, it has no control over
>what it does, acting as if it has one sick lunatic mind.
>All is good, till that animal (named a 'dog') needs to just go
>and decide it doesn't like me - for no reason whatsoever -
>All is well, up to the moment that out of nowhere yet one
>more 'dog' thinks it needs to try and overpower me or something.
So a dog bit you. Barked at you. Whatever. (Excuse me for using all caps,
a.l.s'ers, but it needs to be done): GET THE FUCK OVER IT ALREADY. No one
gives a shit. Getting bit by a dog hardly ranks up there compared with the
problems some people have in life, you whiny little bitch.
>It needs to threaten me with it's appearance. And believe me,
>I'm not scared of any animal that size, I couldn't care less.
>I can kick them so hard they will stop barking forever.
I'm sure that dogs would be impressed by you as well. <snicker>
Oh. Does the fact that you can kick a dog make you feel better about
yourself? Try that shit with a human who can fight back, lamer, and then
come talk to us (if you survive it).
>But still, they need to be all over this stupid world,
I'd rather have 5 billion dogs than 5 billion humans on this planet. Dogs
don't fuck things up as much.
>because some idiots think they need them for something,
Such as....?!? Maybe some of us just like animals, idiot.
>because dourks think they know "love" when they're only
>getting it from dogs.
Oh please. Most people don't confuse love of an animal for (and from) its
owner or master with love for (and from) other humans. Love, for that
matter, is a very complex thing...love between a parent and child, for
example, isn't the same as love between lovers (except in certain cases in
places like Arkansas). And love between pet and human isn't the same
either. You seem to have a very superficial and childish definition of
"love".
>Kick the damn dogs OUT of this world. Very few people really need
>them to survive. All dogs I've encountered in life have some kind
>of multiple-personality syndrome; you just can't count on them.
And you can count on humans? Humans don't have mental disorders?
Personality disorders?
>So, there you have it. Go beat that logic.
WHAT logic? What fucking logic are you espousing here? "Oh, I got bit by a
dog, so now all dogs are evil and mean and they don't like me so kill them
all, waah waah waah.." Please. Get a grip, get a clue or just get out of
a.l.s, you pathetic little fuckmaroon.
>You may try, you may even try hard, but you won't succeed: Dogs suck.
The only reason one might not succeed in this debate is because the person
they're arguing with is a superficial, childish and inane buffoon.
BiNKy
The Prof <GNO...@IX.NETCOM.COM> wrote:
> > ri...@Xusa.net (His Eminence) wrote:
> > >On Mon, 23 Feb 1998 19:03:05 GMT, c@. c@. wrote:
[...]
> > >By protecting your fluffy dog-yard, you only prove your stupidity more.
> >>
> >>J
> >
> >New UK speak????? Binky, can you please translate?
>
> Gareth? Is that Gareth?
>
> The Prof
This guy [?] is posting from Holland [NL] and is at least dutch - if not
double dutch. There *is* a superficial GG resemblance which isn't
easily explained by second language difficulties. It's just plain
vanilla stupitidy which translates in Esperanto even.
I can't help Rick, in the circumstances. It ain't UK-speak...
"Fluffy dog-yard" I kinda like it though - more in fact than fluffy
yard-dog I have to say...
This guy has a way with words like a butcher has with meat - awesome.
On the dog debate [and I think our friend here is having a hard time
living with the embarrasment that the dog that bit him was small and
fluffy and in a yard] - I like 'em! All except Jack Russell terriers
that is - I've been bitten twice, both times by one of that breed. Nasty
cantankerous little bastards they are. The second attacker I barked
loudly at to confuse it, then kicked the li'l fucker into touch... If
there's any jack Russells reading this, the next one gets it's front
legs ripped apart then swung around by the tail and dashed against a
wall.
--
BiNKy ~
FOA/ CASHP#58-96
c@.
My (a)sexual girlfriend assured me that on Tue, 24 Feb 1998 09:16:30 +0100
ch...@cpres.demon.co.uk (BiNKy) smoothly tried to rape her mind
by semiperforating air thusly:
> I can't help Rick, in the circumstances. It ain't UK-speak...
> "Fluffy dog-yard" I kinda like it though - more in fact than fluffy
> yard-dog I have to say...
Yeah well, I did too. Like it, I mean. I re-read the sentence 10 times
once I had it down, and just thought: "Wow! You crank me up! Leave it!"
This "fluffy" and "dog-yard" were just some ways of symbolizing the
average dog-owner's life. Dog-owners bond like kids on a schoolyard.
And it's fluffy because it's fried air. It's like they'd make something
huge out of keeping up with the life of a mosquito. It has no meaning
or goal. Owning a dog doesn't make you successful in life or anything.
> This guy has a way with words like a butcher has with meat - awesome.
OK, I'll take that as a compliment, but I'm not all dutch you know.
Most born americans and english people I see write in usenet
spell worse and make more grammatical mistakes than I do.
I've been partly raised by a brit coming from just outside of London.
And now I find american is much more interesting than most other
languages out there, its slang would need a larger dictionary than
dutch AND english put together. You can do so much with it. I'm always
trying to invent new ways of expression in language, I like you to think.
I like to play with the reader's minds.
> [and I think our friend here is having a hard time
> living with the embarrassment that the dog that bit him was small and
> fluffy and in a yard]
Sorry to disappoint you, you should read my first post on this again.
I never ran away from (these) dogs in my entire life. I got bitten
while I was standing in some room inside a building (not in a yard),
talking to someone, very relaxed. This dog is just walking underneath
me, circling around, I wasn't paying him any attention, and then
all of a sudden it kinda gently bites me in my left upper leg.
I went: "Ouch!" because it actually made a one-spot little wound
inside my leg. Had to get a tetanus-injection for it. That's what
I'm getting at: Dogs are nothing but trouble. I had done nothing to
deserve this crap from any useless pet. They waste my time,
and they don't need to. They don't even need to exist!
J
c@.
"marshall" <mars...@ctelcom.net>:
> Dogs have a sixth sens about certain people ,I trust there instincts
> , they are usualy right!
This proves all my points: You are needy for help from an animal.
I am not. I have this sixth sense myself, I trust my own instincts,
I don't need an animal for that. Hence: YOU are weaker than I am.
My instincts are usually more right than that from dogs points of view.
I sense that you are way more stupid than I am, that you are full
of inferiority complexes, that you would either be jealous of me
or want to hurt me in some way or the other. A cat would not go
sit on your lap, cats have an even better instinct than dogs,
they feel it when a person is not at ease with himself. I like cats
only for their sensual softness and as company (as an equal),
and not because I need them to fulfill my life or needs.
I rest my case: Dogs are for stupid and handicap people.
J
c@.
My (a)sexual girlfriend assured me that on Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:36:27 -0600
moon...@alt-life-sucks.org (Michael Herniated) smoothly tried to rape
her mind by semiperforating air thusly:
> (Trim the headers, O a.l.s'ers; our village idiot here thinks he's clever.)
Haha, and you're so clever to put this in the beginning of your message-body,
I immediately knew I needn't read any of your posting(s) any further.
Michael Hernandez
In article <34fae4ea...@news.xs4all.nl>, c@. c@. wrote:
>"marshall" <mars...@ctelcom.net>:
>
>> Dogs have a sixth sens about certain people ,I trust there instincts
>> , they are usualy right!
>
>This proves all my points: You are needy for help from an animal.
>I am not. I have this sixth sense myself, I trust my own instincts,
>I don't need an animal for that. Hence: YOU are weaker than I am.
>My instincts are usually more right than that from dogs points of view.
I'd highly doubt that. For instance, you felt compelled to say something
unredeemably stupid in a.l.s, a place which abhors stupidity, and then to
keep repeating the mistake. This doesn't speak well of your "instincts".
Oh. Where did our new visitor Marshall say that he needed the instincts of
dogs in his own life? Where did he say he has none of his own? All he said
was that he trusted the instincts that dogs have themselves. He said
nothing about his own. Your logic is questionable at best.
Incidentally, dogs aren't the smartest creatures on the planet, sometimes,
but they usually *are* good judges of character. They can tell who's good
or who's bad. You must have done something to alarm the dog that bit you;
dogs really don't attack someone very often otherwise.
>I sense that you are way more stupid than I am, that you are full
>of inferiority complexes, that you would either be jealous of me
>or want to hurt me in some way or the other.
>A cat would not go sit on your lap,
Bullshit. I've seen cats do it. Hell, cats have sat in *my* lap. Cats are
just as capable of love and affection as dogs are.
>cats have an even better instinct than dogs,
Proven how?
>they feel it when a person is not at ease with himself.
So do dogs.
>I like cats only for their sensual softness
"sensual softness", eh? Ah, *now* we see why you like kitties so much...you
are one sick puppy. <eg>
>and as company (as an equal),
And why can't you grasp the extremely simple concept that dog-owners might
enjoy the animals as company and nothing more? As for the fact that dogs
are pack animals which tend to live in a hierarchial structure...so dogs
don't act as equals with their owners. So what? Not everyone and everything
in this world is equal. Don't be so fucking naive.
I would submit, however, that the dog that bit you had no problem
whatsoever viewing itself as your equal, if not your superior. <snicker>
>and not because I need them to fulfill my life or needs.
And who does?
>I rest my case: Dogs are for stupid and handicap people.
You're resting your case before you've even made a single point? I hope
you're not a lawyer. <eg>
Michael Hernandez
In article <34fbe4f0...@news.xs4all.nl>, c@. c@. wrote:
>My (a)sexual girlfriend assured me that on Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:36:27 -0600
>moon...@alt-life-sucks.org (Michael Herniated) smoothly tried to rape
>her mind by semiperforating air thusly:
"Herniated", eh? Oooo, *that* was really amusing. *Very* creative
there...you almost convince me that you have a double-digit IQ. Almost.
Hmmm...if she's your girlfriend, no doubt she *is* asexual....by choice. If
nothing else, she'd spare us the possibility that more cretins like you
would be brought into this world.
>> (Trim the headers, O a.l.s'ers; our village idiot here thinks he's clever.)
>
>Haha, and you're so clever to put this in the beginning of your message-body,
>I immediately knew I needn't read any of your posting(s) any further.
Why? Because you're mad that I discovered your "clever" little trick? It
*was* rather predictable. Been there, done that. Try something that
*hasn't* been done a million times before. I'm *so* sorry that I annoyed
you, though...really I am...
Or is it that you really are a clueless little fuckhead, and that you don't
read any of my postings because you don't dare? Care to see how I've
embarrassed you and shot your "logic" full of holes today?
Followups set, lamer.
Emma Huntley
The world does not need dogs. Nature can do without them.
This in itself substantiates how ignorant you are. If you were
conversant with the fundamentals of ecology you would then be
cognizant that this statement is in fact totally untrue and
unsubstantiated. When you are in a position to fully comprehend
basic biology then at this point I suggest that you may then be able
to support your opinion with factual knowledge.
Emma
Spoon X-Ray Goggles
Emma Huntley wrote in message <199802242...@zetnet.co.uk>...
Hey, idiot! Even a dog would know to
quote the individual to whom you are
responding. You stupid b*tch! ROTFLMAO!
--
http://home1.gte.net/money25/index.htm
® His Eminence ®
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 21:58:04 GMT, Bo...@cia.kgb.org (Natasha) wrote:
>X-No-Archive: Yes
> At 03:33 EST Tue, 24 Feb 1998 23:00:05 GMT, c@. c@. ponderously
>pontificated:
>
>>"marshall" <mars...@ctelcom.net>:
>>
>>> Dogs have a sixth sens about certain people ,I trust there instincts
>>> , they are usualy right!
I am gaining respect for this dog by the minute. It took the rest of
us two or three posts before we started taking a chunk out of his/her
ass, the dog started right in immediately.
>>
>>This proves all my points: You are needy for help from an animal.
>>I am not. I have this sixth sense myself, I trust my own instincts,
>>I don't need an animal for that. Hence: YOU are weaker than I am.
>>My instincts are usually more right than that from dogs points of view.
Is it your "finely honed instincts" that are moving you so smoothly
into this group?
>>
>>I sense that you are way more stupid than I am, that you are full
>>of inferiority complexes, that you would either be jealous of me
>>or want to hurt me in some way or the other.
Those senses of yours are really something. Ever hear of a
superiority complex? People don't dislike you because they are full of
inferiority complexes. In fact I can't think of anyone who has been
around here lately that is beneath you intellectually? People are not
jealous of your ignorant bullshit! I doubt you are important enough
in anyones life here that they would want to harm you.
> A cat would not go
>>sit on your lap, cats have an even better instinct than dogs,
>>they feel it when a person is not at ease with himself. I like cats
>>only for their sensual softness and as company (as an equal),
>>and not because I need them to fulfill my life or needs.
>>I rest my case: Dogs are for stupid and handicap people.
If this were so, you should start a kennel. Luckily for the dog
world it is not true. I'm not sure I would even wish you on a cat.
BTW, about you expensive meat comment, cats require much higher
protein than dogs do. A bag of dog food is hardly expensive and much
of it contains very little or no meat byproducts at all, mostly soy!
The ones that do contain meat byproducts contain nothing that we would
eat and nothing that could be considered expensive.
>>J
>
>
>
® His Eminence ®
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 09:16:30 +0100, ch...@cpres.demon.co.uk (BiNKy)
wrote:
>This guy [?] is posting from Holland [NL] and is at least dutch - if not
>double dutch. There *is* a superficial GG resemblance which isn't
>easily explained by second language difficulties. It's just plain
>vanilla stupitidy which translates in Esperanto even.
>I can't help Rick, in the circumstances. It ain't UK-speak...
>"Fluffy dog-yard" I kinda like it though - more in fact than fluffy
>yard-dog I have to say...
>This guy has a way with words like a butcher has with meat - awesome.
>On the dog debate [and I think our friend here is having a hard time
>living with the embarrasment that the dog that bit him was small and
>fluffy and in a yard] - I like 'em! All except Jack Russell terriers
>that is - I've been bitten twice, both times by one of that breed. Nasty
>cantankerous little bastards they are. The second attacker I barked
>loudly at to confuse it, then kicked the li'l fucker into touch... If
>there's any jack Russells reading this, the next one gets it's front
>legs ripped apart then swung around by the tail and dashed against a
>wall.
>--
>BiNKy ~
>FOA/ CASHP#58-96
Oh, fjucking Norwegian?
The Prof
"Mary Ann" <mar...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>Big John wrote in message <34f7ecb4...@news.demon.co.uk>...
>>Don't get me wrong about dogs, though. Although I wouldn't have one, I
>>do like well behaved examples. However, and I know you'll disagree
>>zealously on this matter, I detest small yappy dogs. Yorkshire This is
>>just a matter of personal taste, and I wouldn't criticise anybody for
>>having a penchant for chihuahuas ,for example.
>
>
>Agreed, on all counts. *Most* dogs are really cool, but the little
>nippy ones bug me.
>
Wellll, they aren't really dogs. According to Barry the amusing,
they're members of the pillow family.
>
>I personally prefer *owning* cats over dogs because of the convenience.
>You don't have to walk them, and if you go out of town for a few days
>you don't have to worry about it (although I try not to leave him
>alone). And they're clean - none to little bathing needed.
>
None to little bathing accomplished, whether needed or not. Load
yoursef with heavy wet towels or become a vermillion version of
sauerkraut. A cat can become a blender on "liquefy" under the right
circumstances. As for walking, who walks dogs? This is Alabama. The
state where "going postal" is an unfamiliar event because postfolk
don't last that long. They're considered a form of dogfood.
(Not really, all you postfolk out there. None of my dogs, even under
threat of grounding, has ever confessed to scarfing a letter-carrier.
>
>Mary Ann
>CASHP#28-96
>CASHK#96-003
>Friend of ALS
>>
>>BJ
>>CASHK #96-009 CASHP #64-96 FOA
>>http://www.jbuchanan.demon.co.uk
The Prof
¯`·._@_.·´¯
Bo...@cia.kgb.org (Natasha):
> In your first post addressing this subject, you admitted that the dog
> was retaliating against you, due to the fact that you had shut a door
> on said animal, a few days previous to the biting incident.
> Do you think that the animal is really just stupid,. and it would
> never know who hurt it?
Christ! I only shut the door because two angry pit bulls came barking
and running at me, to where I was at, busy doing some things I
didn't need their company for. I never asked for them to exist.
Sheeesh, and now what? I'm supposed to have guilt-trips
for 'hurting' a dog that way? Give me a fucking break!!!
If these dogs didn't come bark and run at me for no reason whatsoever,
there would never have been any problem. The dog-owners should feel guilty.
> Or maybe you thought it would forget about the
> incident, being a dumb animal and all. Betcha though ya really pulled
> a good one with that door thingy, huh? No one would ever know...hehe.
Because I outsmart them dogs, I presumed this could be the reason
it had to bite me, but nevertheless, the reason might as well have been
their stupidity. Pit Bulls have no brains.
> Be grateful all it needed was an injection,
> if you shut (or slammed) a door on me, you'd need a bodycast.
That does it, Tash! They're not my dogs, I did not call for them to
get to where I was back then, or to become part of my life in any way.
And well, if you would be right, god forbid if dogs could read this!
Then I would be in hell by now. In fact, what they cause is worse:
This event has showed me to never leave home without a shotgun,
next time dogs bark and run at me in a place they should not be at,
I'll shoot them on sight. I don't have the time for these dumb
petty pet-problems people project on me with their stinky animals.
> Now it'z time you leave here, daarrling, az I can tell you theze
> people do not really vant to help you.
Did I ever ask for any?
I just saw this thread named "Dogs suck", and thought "Yeah why the
heck not! It's time earth knows the truth about these stupid animals!"
J
The Prof
Enough!
I'm a dog person. I was once (and, I guess, still am) a dog trainer.
I love dogs. ALS has a subtextual affection for cats, even to the
point of starting a satellite group devoted to them. I also like
cats. I've had many of both. Dogs and cats. Enough so that I
realize that each individual animal determines its own worth. Even
so, I tend to favor dogs. Except for those cats I favor.
With that in mind, I have a beautiful dogwood walking stick about 4'
long, cut in the weirdness of days, meticulouosly stained, finished
and polished, whose sole job is to beat the ratfuck out of dogs who
want to bite me when I walk around. They do, from time to time. They
protect what they think is their territory, I protect what I know is
my ass. We have an arrangement.
Can we chill out some? No offense intended, guys. Seems like we're
contending for a small prize.
The Prof
Joe
>Emma Huntley wrote in message <199802242...@zetnet.co.uk>...
>>The world does not need dogs. Nature can do without them.
>>
>>This in itself substantiates how ignorant you are. If you were
>>conversant with the fundamentals of ecology you would then be
>>cognizant that this statement is in fact totally untrue and
>>unsubstantiated. When you are in a position to fully comprehend
>>basic biology then at this point I suggest that you may then be able
>>to support your opinion with factual knowledge.
>
> Hey, idiot! Even a dog would know to
> quote the individual to whom you are
> responding. You stupid b*tch! ROTFLMAO!
Now, Scott...
I'm all in favor of trolling interesting newbies into a.l.s but I must
say you're being a bit blatant about it...
Please use a little more finesse. :)
Or go ahead and bludgeon them, whichever works best...
Joe
--
Nemo - FOA FAWC - CASHP 43-96 - CASHK 96-002 - and Owned by a Cat
Spoon X-Ray Goggles
Joe wrote in message <34f3ab1e...@news3.alt-life-sucks.org>...
I'm still uncertain about her position on dogs.
--
http://home1.gte.net/money25/index.htm
BiNKy
® His Eminence ® <mech...@Xusa.net> wrote:
Njö, Djutch. Sijmilar i suppose - oolmost Scjandinavian by proxjimity.
--
BiNKs
FOA/ CASHP#58-96
marshall
I would like to thank you Michael Hernandez for your suport.
When this so called Human ( J ) said I need help from an animal he was
right at times I have needed there help. Growing up on a farm. I had a
realy good dog.
she had kept angry cattle from stomping my ass into the ground. Chased away
a Bear and Shredded the ass of a peeping Tom.and I'm glad I had her.
I ran a Horse Farm by myself until I met my Husband and moved to Texas.
Just me and my dog she would bring the cattle and horses to the barn and
help load stock trucks. She was more Human than most people. she was always
there when i needed her. even after a rangy Broodmare crushed her skull. 7
days of feeding her with a syringe and ice packs on her head and she was
back at work ,Not many people can do that. The hardest thing I ever had to
do was give her up when I moved becouse she had just had pups when we moved
and I could not bring her with me. that was 6 years ago. and I still miss
her. But I gave her to a good friend. and she is happy and still working.
so this person whoever he is dose not know a whole hell of a lot when it
comes to Dogs.
and by the way I have 16 Dogs some are rescued some I raise.
and I have 2 Cats.!
Hey J lets see your cats try to do half of what this dog has done.!
Besides purr,cough up a hair ball, catch a mouse,and spray the furneture!
and oh yeh! if you haven't figured it out yet I AM A WOMAN!!
I raise American Bulldogs and properly socialized they fit well into any
situation or household.
Donna Marshall
mars...@ctelcom.net
Ailsa
Really bewildered by the lack of understanding about dogs and cats in
some threads(I can't cut and paste on my browser or I would)
Domestic dogs, especially little ones, do require alot of time and
attention, just like kids. They're great for couples who can't have
children. To say they make one weak is like saying parenting makes one
weak. You actually grow more responsive and responsible to another's
needs besides your own.
Helene
Spoon X-Ray Goggles wrote:
> Hey, idiot! Even a dog would know to
> quote the individual to whom you are
> responding. You stupid b*tch! ROTFLMAO!
>
> --
> http://home1.gte.net/money25/index.htm
GEEZ! TAKE YOUR MEDICATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nick
Dogs are not children. People might be able to understand how kids
work (I don't - I hate the little fuckers), but dogs are a different
kettle of fish. They are not a substitute.
If you're suggesting that 'little' dogs require more attention than
big ones, I will return to my policy of keeping my fucking gob shut in
this thread and save you from my somewhat more enlightened (and
arrogant) viewpoint.
Nick
® His Eminence ®
Scott, you could have some of my medication but it really sucks.
Makes me really boring so I quit taking it. Too much of that crap and
you'll be over in alt.cuddle talking about the pretty flowers in the
meadow. Reds are better for usenet posting.! :-)
Wine Train
Dogs don't suck. You probably deserved to get bit. People suck. Dogs
give you unconditional love the stays with you a lifetime. You
suck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nick
On Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:30:20 -0800, wine...@webtv.net (Wine Train)
wrote:
>Dogs don't suck. You probably deserved to get bit. People suck. Dogs
>give you unconditional love the stays with you a lifetime. You
>suck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They also attack and kill people. Mind you, who the fuck can blame
them?
Nick
Michael Anderson
c@.c@ wrote:
>You people don't get it yet?
>Let me explain it to you wussies.
>OK, so here I am, just living my life, minding my own business,
>not bothering anyone with what I'm doing. If anything, only doing
>good things for this world and the people in it. I'm no criminal,
>not a bad guy to anyone (in real life), I don't go around hitting
>or stabbing people for no reason. Basically, my parents have not
>much to be ashamed of. I'm handsome, generous, intelligent, articulate
>and getting by ok for someone that knows how much life can suck.
>But then...
>All goes fine, until some animal all of a sudden appears,
>it yells out strange loud noises in my direction
>- for no reason whatsoever -, it has no control over
>what it does, acting as if it has one sick lunatic mind.
>All is good, till that animal (named a 'dog') needs to just go
>and decide it doesn't like me - for no reason whatsoever -
>All is well, up to the moment that out of nowhere yet one
>more 'dog' thinks it needs to try and overpower me or something.
>It needs to threaten me with it's appearance. And believe me,
>I'm not scared of any animal that size, I couldn't care less.
>I can kick them so hard they will stop barking forever.
>But still, they need to be all over this stupid world,
>because some idiots think they need them for something,
>because dourks think they know "love" when they're only
>getting it from dogs.
>"Oh I know my dog so well" this and that, and "oh brave doggy,
>you listen to me don't you?" this and that. "Oh look, it can
>do tricks" pff, really, people! Wake up! Go get civilized!
>Kick the damn dogs OUT of this world. Very few people really need
>them to survive. All dogs I've encountered in life have some kind
>of multiple-personality syndrome; you just can't count on them.
>But the difference with cats is; they need to bother you with
>their problems, cats don't. Cats mind their own business,
>and therefore always like me instantly. They feel it.
>They feel my hatred towards that stupid arrogant
>other species used as a pet: The Dog.
>So, there you have it. Go beat that logic. You may try,
>you may even try hard, but you won't succeed: Dogs suck.
>J
Jeez, what kind of a jackass takes the time to articulate their
obvioulsy bored life into a lengthy piece of shit like this--asshole
¯`·._@_.·´¯
My (a)sexual girlfriend assured me that on Sun, 01 Mar 1998 04:49:00 GMT
ande7...@sooners.net (Michael Anderson) smoothly tried to rape
her mind by semiperforating air thusly:
[cut]
> Jeez, what kind of a jackass takes the time to articulate their
> obvioulsy bored life into a lengthy piece of shit like this--asshole
I did, and I liked doing it. What is your problem?
And I don't see how writing a piece like that for people like
you to read in usenet immediately means I have a 'bored life',
if anything, I'd say you are the one with a bored life to go and read it.
You must be a real scary person, mister tight-ass.
Go yell at your own kind, I'm way out of your league (obviously).
Afraid I was right, "asshole" ?