first played someone last week in 5 pointer it was tediously slow
but i struggled on, eventually i said to him "isnt this lag awful" (3 or 4
minutes a move]
u will never believe his reply it was.... "my employees keep
coming and asking questions" this really infuriated me
and for first time ever i deliberatly dropped
second in another match i played someone from denmark started
pestering me to play for 10 dollars a point i said no but he kept on about it
but i stood my ground.next thing he starts critisising my moves even though he
300 rating points lower. then he starts on abiout me being to quiet.to cap
off this 30 minutes of very unenjoyable bg he fluked a gammon.
helmet
>encountered playing bg on the net
I don't usually get too much despicable behavior because on
the net and in real life I will not play against undesirable
or unethical opponents even if I stand to make a lot of money.
However, I remember one more humorous, albeit annoying occurrence
a year or so ago on FIBS.
I was playing and winning the third of 3 1 pt. matches against
my opponent and suddenly he breaks out into a sort of Shakespearian
outburst after each roll (talking about himself):
"Am I so weak?"
"Can I be so bad?"
"Am I worse than a beginner?"
and so on. I couldn't really console him without insulting him
by explaining that dice can be cruel so just endured this
barrage until we finished. I couldn't believe someone could be
so emotional about losing 3 1 ptrs in a row, that is not that
rare an occurrence after all. I was embarrassed thinking about
the poor guy in such a state behind his terminal.
Graham.
Hi all,
I hope this develops into a thread...
As a newbie to bg and FIBS, I often wonder what behavior on
my part my opponents might find annoying/offensive, and this
information doesn't appear in the faq or any other materials
I've found to read.
For example, my service has a by-the-month fee, and I didn't
realize the some folks payed by the minute to play
and were justifiably irritated at my slowness.
I'm sure newbies often do annoying things just because they
don't know any better, and a thread like this would help
educate us and make us better opponents.
I just hope comments give only the circumstances, and don't
get into names!
Marsha
marina/mas on fibs
wisn...@teleport.com wrote:
--
Marina Smith - Reading U.K, to mail me remove XX from address
Me too, so I play on Richards PBM Server where you don't have to be
online :-) Maybe one day we'll have free local calls here too, then us
Brits can join the fun!
Phil Shulkind
PHILDEE ENTERPRISES
Professional Play By Mail since 1990
*NEW* web site : http://www.phildee.demon.co.uk
helmet <acu...@es.co.nz> wrote in article
<acummin.8...@es.co.nz>...
I recently had a game where I rolled 4's, 5's, or 6's on four
consecutive rolls, to first run past a prime, then race home. I guess
the odds on that are what, 1 in 20,736? I've also had games where I
danced twice in a row against a two-point board, then a three-point,
and - you get the idea. Gammon city.
It cuts both ways. Years ago when they started using computers to
deal hands for bridge tournaments, people claimed that computer-dealt
hands were more freakish than probabilities would suggest, and
although literally hundreds of people have analyzed the hands (myself
included) some people won't believe they're random. I feel the same
about FIBS. I mean, why in heaven's name would someone rig the dice?
When you win, or lose - accept that the dice are what they are.
can anyone add to this... I am sure its possible maybe we can get ten
good ones together.
I've got one!
Don't offer to resign a single game in a position where you can still be
gammoned (even if it would require an extremely unlucky sequence)! I
think it is best to wait to resign a single game only when you have
clearly reached an ungammonable position.
>I'd like to add something here.
>If someone invites you and you don't want to play them, a simple
>"No thanks" is better than no reply at all.
>It can get very frustrating to invite 3 or 4 people on the 'who ready'
>list and not get any responses.
>Also, if you're away or watching and don't want to play, remember to
>toggle ready.
>This will eliminate people inviting you.
>Thanks for letting me add my 2 cents.
In a way I agree... but if you see someone online who's been idle for
10 or 15 minutes, and you invite them, don't be surprised if they
don't reply. I never invite someone who's been idle for more than a
couple minutes.
And there are limits to the resign option. Imagine you have been
closed out, your opponent opens the 6-point and you roll 6-1.
Opponent now rolls non-doubles, leaving 13 checkers on, you roll 2-1.
I'd certainly accept a single point as the leading position. You need
four doubles in a row, coupled with opponent rolling 4 straight very
bad numbers. Give it up; life is too short.
On the other hand, not long ago I had 14 off and one checker on the
17-point. Opponent (with no checkers off) got a roll to get all
checkers to his inner board and offered a single point. All I need
are 5's or 6's. That was a bit much.
I agree with everything you wrote except the good luck comment.
This one I just don't get. I would like to understand why people
wish me good luck and what they mean by that -- perhaps someone
can educate me. While I want the dice rolls to always to be
determined by a fair and random process, frankly, I want my
opponent to have bad luck, all else being equal. Especially if
my opponent is better than me -- how else could I win?
David Montgomery
monty on FIBS
mo...@cs.umd.edu
On the other hand, unless you're playing for blood, what's the harm in
_accepting_ a 1-pt instead of a 2-pt resignation? Some of these players
are kids, and losing hurts. Or to slice it another way, FIBS is a great
place to meet everyone, including people who don't eggzackly worship the
game they enjoy so much.
azrael (dco...@pobox.com)
People wish you good luck as a form of pre-game blessing, the purpose of
which is to encourage an interesting and fun game, a component of any
contest between two individuals is (or should be) sportsmanship.
when you play backgammon you are playing a game, you may wish and
hope and fight to win but at the end of the day we are just playing a
game. The purpose of wishing your opponent good luck is to hope that you
are challenged as a player, how much more satisfying is a victory over
your opponents good luck then a victory over your oponents bad luck?
dean...@iconn.net TRIDENT on netgammon
Okay, thanks for the translation. I'm all for interesting and fun
games, good sportsmanship, and a challenge. I just had the feeling that
all these people who were wishing me good luck were also hoping that
I would keep dancing on their 3-point boards, that I would miss their
blots, and that I would fail to roll big numbers in races, so I wasn't
sure what it meant. Now I know. :-)
-Patti
--
Patti Beadles |
pat...@netcom.com/pat...@gammon.com |
http://www.gammon.com/ | "I trust you. It's just
or just yell, "Hey, Patti!" | that I'm scared of you."
Yes!!!! And then the truly amazing phenomenon is the small percentage
of these well-wishers who become extremely bitter and whiny when your
luck actually IS good....Maybe you just can't interpret the words
literally, like when somebody asks you "How do you do?" and clearly
means, simply, "Hello".
I usually just say "Hi" when I begin an online match, but when playing
face-to-face I'm sometimes guilty of an idle "Good luck" remark--never
gave it much thought, however I guess I'm wishing us both equally good
luck and hoping that the game is decided mostly by good play. At any
rate, I certainly hope no one considers it annoying. And yes, if
someone is to have better luck than the other, "better me than thee." :)
its like the players who type gg after each game no matter how bad,until they
start losing that is and gg no longer pops up after game
>> In article <5ok93k$4...@twix.cs.umd.edu>,
>> David Montgomery <mo...@cs.umd.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> >I agree with everything you wrote except the good luck comment.
>> >This one I just don't get.
snip
>I usually just say "Hi" when I begin an online match,
snip
Well, "Meow" works for me... but that's just a species advantage :)
Greycat
Gre...@idt.net.spamguard
Does anyone have any spare tunafish??
Remove "spamguard" from return address to reply
> > I've got one!
> > Don't offer to resign a single game in a position where you can
> still be
> > gammoned (even if it would require an extremely unlucky sequence)!
> I
> > think it is best to wait to resign a single game only when you have
> > clearly reached an ungammonable position.
>
> On the other hand, unless you're playing for blood, what's the harm in
>
> _accepting_ a 1-pt instead of a 2-pt resignation? Some of these
> players
> are kids, and losing hurts.
sometomes there's harm... i've had people try to trick me into accepting
single point resign when it was a sure gammon (single pt not enough to
end match). obviously this happens occasionally by mistake, not always
by malice.
on games grid, where you can offer settlements, i had someone offer me
less than cube value in a gammon position
wilfo
> He wrote that the habit of my
> picking up a piece, moving it, and putting it back on its original
> space,
> was too annoying to be allowed. I wrote him that I would try and
> refrain
> from doing it, but that it was allowed by the computer program, and in
> fact
> allowed by the rules of backgammon. He told me that the next time I
> did
> it, he was going to drop and not resume the match.
ding, ding, we have a winner :)
wilfo