Match-Table from BB-matches
Peter Fankhauser
Hi all,
without much prosa this time, here is the latest match-table for
the Big-Brother Matches.
good dice,
funk
PS.: where is BigBrother? - on vacation? :)
PPS.: now that fibs is in Kit Woolsey's vicinity, is there any chance
that the huge Fibs-log itself will be used for determining the
"real" figures?
---------------------------------------------------------------
Match Percentages (for 2512 Matches in BB-Database, August95-April96)
1pc 1c 2 3 4 5 6 7
1pc: 50.0 - 53.4 72.9 69.5 76.9 78.9 100.0
1c: - 50.0 64.2 78.3 83.8 87.1 88.2 93.0
2: 46.6 35.8 50.0 57.9 63.2 74.1 70.2 80.6
3: 27.1 21.7 42.1 50.0 57.1 64.3 74.6 76.1
4: 30.5 16.2 36.8 42.9 50.0 57.7 62.3 68.8
5: 23.1 12.9 25.9 35.7 42.3 50.0 60.2 65.8
6: 21.1 11.8 29.8 25.4 37.7 39.8 50.0 58.3
7: 0.0 7.0 19.4 23.9 31.2 34.2 41.7 50.0
1pc stands for 1-away post-crawford
1c stands for 1-away crawford (including 1pters).
Number of examples for a particular score:
1pc 1c 2 3 4 5 6 7
1pc: 186 0 189 96 82 26 19 2
1c: 0 350 137 387 105 249 34 71
2: 189 137 292 565 190 228 57 62
3: 96 387 565 826 308 471 71 176
4: 82 105 190 308 145 477 69 96
5: 26 249 228 471 477 952 108 225
6: 19 34 57 71 69 108 49 218
7: 2 71 62 176 96 225 218 507
was after ~1000 matches (August95-October 95)
1c 2 3 4 5 6 7
1c: 50.0 66.7 76.3 79.5 88.2 91.3 91.2
2: 33.3 50.0 57.1 61.1 76.3 71.1 81.1
3: 23.7 42.9 50.0 55.8 63.4 78.3 76.7
4: 20.5 38.9 44.2 50.0 58.5 64.1 65.5
5: 11.8 23.7 36.6 41.5 50.0 64.8 63.3
6: 8.7 28.9 21.7 35.9 35.2 50.0 53.1
7: 8.8 18.9 23.3 34.5 36.7 46.9 50.0
For comparison Kit Woolsey's Match-table (taken from Stephen Turner
site)
(I think 1 stands for 1 away crawford).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 70 75 83 85 90 91
2 30 50 60 68 75 81 85
3 25 40 50 59 66 71 76
4 17 32 41 50 58 64 70
5 15 25 34 42 50 57 63
6 10 19 29 36 43 50 56
7 9 15 24 30 37 44 50
Alexander Nitschke
Peter Fankhauser wrote:
>
> Number of examples for a particular score:
>
> 1pc 1c 2 3 4 5 6 7
> 1pc: 186 0 189 96 82 26 19 2
> 1c: 0 350 137 387 105 249 34 71
> 2: 189 137 292 565 190 228 57 62
> 3: 96 387 565 826 308 471 71 176
> 4: 82 105 190 308 145 477 69 96
> 5: 26 249 228 471 477 952 108 225
> 6: 19 34 57 71 69 108 49 218
> 7: 2 71 62 176 96 225 218 507
I always thought the 1c-1c-situation is impossible. But here it happens
350 times! Why did I never get this one :-)
Alexander (acey_deucey on FIBS)
Peter Fankhauser
Alexander Nitschke wrote:
>
> I always thought the 1c-1c-situation is impossible. But here it happens
> 350 times! Why did I never get this one :-)
>
say 1c is not-post-crawford. For 1c,1c
this can of course only be 1pters, and fortunately (for my script:),
an independent counter counts exactly 350 1pters. A slight
inaccuracy, but I couldn't be bothered to "if it out".
funk