Iraq accepts U.N. Plan
A Planet Visitor
Hopefully, this has averted the 'invasion' which could have been a
display of 'brinksmanship,' by the U.S. and British governments
to insure the most compliance possible with that resolution. One
can only hope that is the case.
Still to be decided is just how 'open' Iraq really intends to be.
PV
Mr Q. Z. Diablo
Visitor" <abc...@zbqytr.ykq> wrote:
I'm cautiously optimistic. I think that the arse-kicking that Saddam
received the first time around has led to his compliance. He doesn't
want it to happen again as it would (although, probably, at the cost of
significantly more lives). The brinkmanship bit is simply because a
despotic leader such as Saddam cannot afford to look "weak" to his
people. He wishes to have been seen to have tweaked the nose of the USA.
What news on the sanctions, BTW? Will they be lifted now that Iraq has
complied? I sincerely hope so.
Mr Q. Z. D.
--
Drinker, systems administrator, wannabe writer, musician and all-round bastard.
"...Base 8 is just like base 10 really... ((o))
If you're missing two fingers." - Tom Lehrer ((O))
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: Iraq accepts U.N. Plan
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:21:45 +0000
>
>le Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:19:31 GMT, dans l'article
><jonathan-9D0669...@newsroom.utas.edu.au>, Mr Q. Z. Diablo
><jona...@zeouane.org.remove.this.it.is.bollocks> a dit ...
>
>{ snip }
>
>> What news on the sanctions, BTW? Will they be lifted now that Iraq has
>> complied? I sincerely hope so.
>
>Now, now, Jon ... _stop_ asking awkward questions ! The half-million Iraqi
>children who have died since the sanctions were imposed, are, to quote LDB,
>'ragheads', and thus are unimportant.
>
>Remember that.
>
>--
>Desmond Coughlan
>desmond @ zeouane.org
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!feed1.newsreader.com!news
reader.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.ne
t!newsfeed.fjserv.net!colt.net!peernews3.colt.net!news0.de.colt.net!news-f
ra1.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni
>-berlin.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: Iraq accepts U.N. Plan
>Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:21:45 +0000
>Lines: 18
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <9qmuqa....@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <LIvA9.185924$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><jonathan-9D0669...@newsroom.utas.edu.au>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1037229915 14340075 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
>X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
>X-OS: BSD UNIX
>X-No-Archive: true
>Mail-Copies-To: never
>X-Obsessive-Litany: http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>X-Chats: http://www.zeouane.org/chats/
>X-PGP: http://www.zeouane.org/pgp/pubring.pkr
>X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3F1F C838 88D5 2659 B00A 6DF6 6883 FB9C E34A AC93
>User-Agent: tin/1.5.14-20020926 ("Soil") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.5-RELEASE (i386))
>
>
The Dr. Dolly Coughlan archive exists because Desmond Coughlan lacks conviction
in his words. He won't allow his posts to be archived in Google. Please feel
free to use it to your advantage.
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: Iraq accepts U.N. Plan
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:45:47 +0000
>
>le Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:11:07 GMT, dans l'article
><LIvA9.185924$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor
><abc...@zbqytr.ykq> a dit ...
>
>> http://www.cnn.com/
>>
>> Hopefully, this has averted the 'invasion' which could have been a
>> display of 'brinksmanship,' by the U.S. and British governments
>> to insure the most compliance possible with that resolution. One
>> can only hope that is the case.
>>
>> Still to be decided is just how 'open' Iraq really intends to be.
>
>I join with you in 'hoping' that this will avert war. However, I fear that
>it will not, as the _real_ aim of the Bush Administration's
>'sabre-rattling' of recent months, had nothing to do with 'weapons of mass
>destruction', and everything to do with securing access to the oil
>resources in Iraq, and those further East on the banks of the Caspian Sea.
>
>War will thus come, nonetheless.
>
>--
>Desmond Coughlan
>desmond @ zeouane.org
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!nntp1.roc.gblx.net!nntp.g
blx.net!nntp.gblx.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.ne
ws.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: Iraq accepts U.N. Plan
>Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:45:47 +0000
>Lines: 24
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <b43uqa....@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <LIvA9.185924$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1037209860 13504911 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
A Planet Visitor
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> wrote in message news:9qmuqa....@lievre.voute.net...
> le Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:19:31 GMT, dans l'article <jonathan-9D0669...@newsroom.utas.edu.au>, Mr Q. Z.
Diablo <jona...@zeouane.org.remove.this.it.is.bollocks> a dit ...
>
> { snip }
>
> > complied? I sincerely hope so.
>
> children who have died since the sanctions were imposed, are, to quote LDB,
> 'ragheads', and thus are unimportant.
>
as I'm here. And be reminded of. Along with YOUR other quotes, none
of them mine, such as --
"the 'onery ragheads' * that are Arabs"
"not that Iraq has anything to do with al'Queda either, other than
that it's ruled by 'filthy ragheads'"
"Hey, why bother, right ? They're only ragheads ... 'Arab cunts'"
"'What the fuck, it's only ragheads ?"
"Iraq is ruled by 'filthy ragheads.'"
"Palestinians are 'dishonest'"
"The maniacal laughter as yet more 'ragheads' (sic) were killed in Palestine."
> Remember that.
>
Remember that.
PV
> --
> Desmond Coughlan |Superlunary and Most Exalted
|Spiritual Leader of the Universal
|Right to Life Church. (umm... get
|away from me -- you filthy black
|starving child in Africa) 'My church'
|isn't for you.
Hugh Neary
<jona...@zeouane.org.remove.this.it.is.bollocks> wrote:
>In article <LIvA9.185924$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, "A Planet
>Visitor" <abc...@zbqytr.ykq> wrote:
>
>> http://www.cnn.com/
>>
>> Hopefully, this has averted the 'invasion' which could have been a
>> display of 'brinksmanship,' by the U.S. and British governments
>> to insure the most compliance possible with that resolution. One
>> can only hope that is the case.
>>
>> Still to be decided is just how 'open' Iraq really intends to be.
>
>I'm cautiously optimistic. I think that the arse-kicking that Saddam
>received the first time around has led to his compliance. He doesn't
>want it to happen again as it would (although, probably, at the cost of
>significantly more lives). The brinkmanship bit is simply because a
>despotic leader such as Saddam cannot afford to look "weak" to his
>people. He wishes to have been seen to have tweaked the nose of the USA.
>
>What news on the sanctions, BTW? Will they be lifted now that Iraq has
>complied? I sincerely hope so.
>
You are indeed a naive soul QZ. From my perusal of the Guardian it
seems that Saddam has to prove himself innocent of all charges beyond
any doubt whatsoever. Even the uncorroborated testimony of a UK/ US
pilot stated he was fired upon will be classed as a breach of the
resolution.
Bush and Blair han't moved all those troops in for a
sightseeing tour. Methinks Saddams oil is about to be "liberated" and
rehoused in a few million US fuel tanks.
HN
Mr Q. Z. Diablo
<spamstopper@net> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:19:31 GMT, "Mr Q. Z. Diablo"
> <jona...@zeouane.org.remove.this.it.is.bollocks> wrote:
> >What news on the sanctions, BTW? Will they be lifted now that Iraq has
> >complied? I sincerely hope so.
> >
>
> You are indeed a naive soul QZ. From my perusal of the Guardian it
> seems that Saddam has to prove himself innocent of all charges beyond
> any doubt whatsoever. Even the uncorroborated testimony of a UK/ US
> pilot stated he was fired upon will be classed as a breach of the
> resolution.
That's only your opinion, Hugh. I don't have much faith but I remain
hopeful. My feeling is that, if sanctions on Iraq are lifted, then
everybody wins.
> Bush and Blair han't moved all those troops in for a
> sightseeing tour. Methinks Saddams oil is about to be "liberated" and
> rehoused in a few million US fuel tanks.
I would prefer to think that the USA's action is over something as
simple as oil rather than any number of other explanations that I have
come up with.
A Planet Visitor
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> wrote in message news:9sm2ra....@lievre.voute.net...
> le Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:18:56 GMT, dans l'article <kfHA9.188593$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor
<abc...@zbqytr.ykq> a dit ...
>
> >> > What news on the sanctions, BTW? Will they be lifted now that Iraq has
> >> > complied? I sincerely hope so.
>
> >> Now, now, Jon ... _stop_ asking awkward questions ! The half-million Iraqi
> >> children who have died since the sanctions were imposed, are, to quote LDB,
> >> 'ragheads', and thus are unimportant.
>
> > Actually, it is YOUR 'quote' and one you will have to live with as long
> > as I'm here. And be reminded of. Along with YOUR other quotes, none
> > of them mine, such as --
>
> of me, is of as much importance, as the cur that I kicked on the way into
> work this morning (oh I forgot ... I'm unemployed, aren't I ? LOL !).
You're in denial, ol' bubblehead. My 'opinion' of you is extremely
important to you, or you would quickly confine me for the third time to your
'illustrious' killfile. The fact that you do not recognize this, or would
deviously try to deny it because you perceive it to mean you would
'lose face' that you never had to begin with here, demonstrates
your fragile emotional state. I certainly admit that your 'opinion' of me,
both in your personal attacks against me, and your perverse bigoted
attacks against all retentionists, is of some concern to me. What is
sad, is that you have no life to speak of, other than in this pitiful forum.
Here I am, at retirement age, living in 'shuffleboard city.' There you are,
still probably half my age, living in one of the three most vibrant cities
in the world. And I have more of a life than you do. Now if THAT'S not
pitiful... then the word has no meaning. And clearly you are unemployed,
and desperately trying to scrape by from day to day... which will cause
you grief in your later years, I can guarantee that. Actually, in my eyes,
you could have been cast as a 'character' from La Bohème.
> Not
> only are you wholly irrelevent in the world at large, but in here, too.
I believe you have already recognized that 'we are all' irrelevant here.
No one here presumes for even an instant that you have any relevance
to the world at large. But your often perverted form of posting, although
it is easily recognized as irrelevant, in respect to having any real meaning,
certainly demands examination. In a forum such as this, I would be
derelict in my duties as a human, were I to stay totally silent to
your postings -- which include racism, anti-Americanism, homophobia,
lies, egocentricity, sexual perversion, *giggles* over every tragedy,
mindless drivel, personal insults, bigotry, and a number of other rather
disgusting flaws in your character such as a lack of dignity, embarrassment,
or honor. I already feel that I permit too much of your postings
to remain unanswered, but others seem concerned with 'bandwidth.'
> And as I pointed out only a few days ago, I could make the most
> outrageously racist statements in here, and when you quote them back to the
> group, they are immediately considered 'false'.
Obviously, that's again simply trying to pound 10 pounds of shit, into a
5 pound bag. When YOU make 'outrageous racist statements,' then
in the 'eye' of any rational observer, you ARE a racist. One who 'talks
the talk,' is obviously 'walking the walk.'
> So the 'quotes' (sic)
> below, are of no importance whatsoever, as the mere fact that _you_ quote
> them, means that no one will believe them.
>
> And yet still you dance ...
>
Once again... your use of (sic), forms the image of God stamping
"LOSER" on your forehead. But strangely enough, you say "below,"
yet conveniently CLIP that "below," attempting to hide your own
quotes, without even noting that you had 'clipped' it.
PV
> --
> Ayatollah Desmond Coughlan |Superlunary and Most Exalted
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: Iraq accepts U.N. Plan
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:47:21 +0000
>
>le Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:18:56 GMT, dans l'article
><kfHA9.188593$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor
><abc...@zbqytr.ykq> a dit ...
>
>>> > What news on the sanctions, BTW? Will they be lifted now that Iraq has
>>> > complied? I sincerely hope so.
>
>>> Now, now, Jon ... _stop_ asking awkward questions ! The half-million
>Iraqi
>>> children who have died since the sanctions were imposed, are, to quote
>LDB,
>>> 'ragheads', and thus are unimportant.
>
>> Actually, it is YOUR 'quote' and one you will have to live with as long
>> as I'm here. And be reminded of. Along with YOUR other quotes, none
>> of them mine, such as --
>
>Dear, dear, dear ... it still hasn't sunk in yet, has it ? Your 'opinion'
>of me, is of as much importance, as the cur that I kicked on the way into
>work this morning (oh I forgot ... I'm unemployed, aren't I ? LOL !). Not
>only are you wholly irrelevent in the world at large, but in here, too.
>And as I pointed out only a few days ago, I could make the most
>outrageously racist statements in here, and when you quote them back to the
>group, they are immediately considered 'false'. So the 'quotes' (sic)
>below, are of no importance whatsoever, as the mere fact that _you_ quote
>them, means that no one will believe them.
>
>And yet still you dance ...
>
>--
>Desmond Coughlan
>desmond @ zeouane.org
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!chi1
.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!proxad.net!wanadoo.fr!opentransit.net!fu
-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: Iraq accepts U.N. Plan
>Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:47:21 +0000
>Lines: 30
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <9sm2ra....@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <LIvA9.185924$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><jonathan-9D0669...@newsroom.utas.edu.au>
><9qmuqa....@lievre.voute.net>
><kfHA9.188593$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1037361124 14785171 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
Dr. Dolly Coughlan
<pasdespa...@zeouane.org> writes:
>Subject: Re: Iraq accepts U.N. Plan
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:16:48 +0000
>
>le Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:02:59 GMT, dans l'article <DxbB9.288988$S8.5932258=
>@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor <abc...@zbqytr.ykq> a dit ...=
>=20
>
>{ snip }
>
>>> Dear, dear, dear ... it still hasn't sunk in yet, has it ? Your 'opin=
>ion'
>>> of me, is of as much importance, as the cur that I kicked on the way i=
>nto
>>> work this morning (oh I forgot ... I'm unemployed, aren't I ? LOL !).
>
>{ snip }
>
>> Here I am, at retirement age, living in 'shuffleboard city.' There you=
> are,
>> still probably half my age, living in one of the three most vibrant cit=
>ies
>> in the world. And I have more of a life than you do.=20=20
>
>Ho, ho, ho ... LDB lays claim to telepathy. Which gimmick is that, again=
> ?
>
>> Now if THAT'S not
>> pitiful... then the word has no meaning.=20=20
>
>No, what you say has 'no meaning'. But I enjoy 'yanking [sic] your chain=
>'.
>
>> And clearly you are unemployed, and desperately trying to scrape by fro=
>m
>> day to day...=20
>
><sigh> What can I say, you got me. Here I am, just put down a deposit o=
>n
>a new bike, buying our flat, and preparing a nursery for the 'little 'un'=
>,
>and I'm unemployed ? Jesus, 'welfare' (sic) is better in France than eve=
>n
>_I_ had imagined.
>
>> which will cause you grief in your later years, I can guarantee that.
>> Actually, in my eyes, you could have been cast as a 'character' from La
>> Boh=E8me.
>
>Do you 'LOVE' (sic) Puccini, as much as you 'LOVE' (sic) Tennyson ? LOL =
>!
>
>>> Not
>>> only are you wholly irrelevent in the world at large, but in here, too=
>.
>
>> I believe you have already recognized that 'we are all' irrelevant here=
>.
>
>No, we are all irrelevant in the outside world, but we have relevance
>_here_. You have none, here, or in the outside world.
>
>{ snip rest as it was based on a false premise }
>
>>> And as I pointed out only a few days ago, I could make the most
>>> outrageously racist statements in here, and when you quote them back t=
>o the
>>> group, they are immediately considered 'false'.
>
>> Obviously, that's again simply trying to pound 10 pounds of shit, into =
>a
>> 5 pound bag. When YOU make 'outrageous racist statements,' then
>> in the 'eye' of any rational observer, you ARE a racist. One who 'talk=
>s
>> the talk,' is obviously 'walking the walk.'
>
>Again, you fail to comprehend, and I'm sorry but I don't write Russian, s=
>o
>I can't make it any easier for you. Perhaps I should just 'accuse' (sic)
>you of writing 'plonk' ..? *snort*
>
>>> So the 'quotes' (sic)
>>> below, are of no importance whatsoever, as the mere fact that _you_ qu=
>ote
>>> them, means that no one will believe them.
>>>
>>> And yet still you dance ...
>
>> Once again... your use of (sic), forms the image of God stamping
>> "LOSER" on your forehead. But strangely enough, you say "below,"
>> yet conveniently CLIP that "below," attempting to hide your own
>> quotes, without even noting that you had 'clipped' it.
>
>Any chance of getting that in English ?
>=20
>--=20
>Desmond Coughlan=20=20=20=20=20
>desmond @ zeouane.org
>http: // www . zeouane . org
>http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
>
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-b
erlin.de!uni-berlin.de!e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.FR!not-for-mail
>From: Desmond Coughlan <pasdespa...@zeouane.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
>Subject: Re: Iraq accepts U.N. Plan
>Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:16:48 +0000
>Lines: 96
>Sender: Desmond Coughlan <des...@lievre.voute.net>
>Message-ID: <07h3ra....@lievre.voute.net>
>References: <LIvA9.185924$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><jonathan-9D0669...@newsroom.utas.edu.au>
><9qmuqa....@lievre.voute.net>
><kfHA9.188593$r7.34...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
><9sm2ra....@lievre.voute.net>
><DxbB9.288988$S8.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: e117.dhcp212-198-68.noos.fr (212.198.68.117)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1037388039 15723287 212.198.68.117 (16 [91468])
A Planet Visitor
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> wrote in message news:07h3ra....@lievre.voute.net...
le Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:02:59 GMT, dans l'article <DxbB9.288988$S8.59...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, A Planet Visitor
<abc...@zbqytr.ykq> a dit ...
{ snip }
> Here I am, at retirement age, living in 'shuffleboard city.' There you are,
> still probably half my age, living in one of the three most vibrant cities
> in the world. And I have more of a life than you do.
desi -- Ho, ho, ho ... LDB lays claim to telepathy. Which gimmick is that, again ?
pv -- It doesn't take much more than the simple observation that your entire
existence revolves about this group, ol' Bubblehead.
pv -- There is a pattern of 'territorial aggression' in all your posts. A pathological
drive to 'dominate' the group with your presumed august presence, and fill your
egocentric being, because of your inability to function in 'real life mode.'
Your obsession with calling it 'my group,' your constant combative stance,
that begins by insulting any form of dialog which might represent a contest
in this struggle for domination. The endless stream of 'mindless drivel'
pouring forth from almost all of your posts. You will do anything.. create any lie...
distort any meaning... insult any poster... function in the most devious animal
instinct... in your expression of this 'territorial imperative.' Your instinct,
now gone totally amok, demands this domination... to 'kill' those you see as
a danger to your control of your 'pride,' in the sense of an animal territorial
imperative. It's almost fascinating to watch your devious mind at work.. if only
to recognize how destructive it is to the human intellect. Our behavior is
the wellspring of much of our lives. When rational, it is used to persuade
and communication knowledge. When irrational, as yours, it is used to
threaten, deceive or try to control using any means, no matter how immoral
those means may be.
pv -- In short, you will do ANYTHING to insure your survival and your presumed
dominance here. ANYTHING. Your ego dominated id consumes you here,
having been caught up in a great swirling whirlpool, of your own creation, sucking
your further and further in, where you find yourself incapable of escaping. It
has taken over your 'real life.' You no longer have such a life. It doesn't take
telepathy to figure that out. One simply has to read your posts. And recognize
the great volume of trash that emanates from your now rather disturbed mind.
Young... in Paris ... and consumed with living an imaginary lie in an imaginary
world. How totally pathetic. And even more, since you are unable to see
YOURSELF.
> Now if THAT'S not
> pitiful... then the word has no meaning.
desi -- No, what you say has 'no meaning'. But I enjoy 'yanking [sic] your chain'.
pv -- You may 'think' so... but there is a clear indication that my posting
disturbs you greatly, expecially when I get 'close to home.' BTW --
God again stamps "LOSER" on your forehead.
> And clearly you are unemployed, and desperately trying to scrape by from
> day to day...
desi -- <sigh> What can I say, you got me. Here I am, just put down a deposit on
a new bike, buying our flat, and preparing a nursery for the 'little 'un',
and I'm unemployed ? Jesus, 'welfare' (sic) is better in France than even
_I_ had imagined.
pv -- If you say so... but given your track record, no one believes you. And
even God must be getting tired stamping "LOSER."
> which will cause you grief in your later years, I can guarantee that.
> Actually, in my eyes, you could have been cast as a 'character' from La
> Bohème.
desi -- Do you 'LOVE' (sic) Puccini, as much as you 'LOVE' (sic) Tennyson ? LOL !
pv -- How very 'intellectual' of you... presuming that everyone expects that
you KNEW La Bohème, was the music of Puccini. ROTFLMAO.
If it's not Eminem, you're lost, without the 'net.' In fact, if you look at
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=DNVM5.3603%24Ze6.423639%40typhoon.tampabay.rr.com&output=gplain
You will see that I visited the villa where Puccini purportedly penned
Madama Butterfly, which is a tourist attraction, before you were even
born, sport. And yes... I do love Puccini, and Rossini and Verdi. I
have about EVERY opera penned by Puccini that has been
produced on video... including La Boheme, Madama Butterfly,
Turandot, La fanciulla del West, and Tosca. Plus a number of
video productions of the operas of Rossini and Verdi, and of course,
Bizet's Carmen. And you will see that I 'used' a verse from Tennyson,
long before I identified you as the 'glassy-headed hairless man.'
Although I could not have come up with a more appropriate vision. See
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4D%25D7.581884%248c3.90639290%40typhoon.tampabay.rr.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
More than a year ago, in a post to Earl.
>> Not
>> only are you wholly irrelevent in the world at large, but in here, too.
> I believe you have already recognized that 'we are all' irrelevant here.
desi -- No, we are all irrelevant in the outside world, but we have relevance
_here_. You have none, here, or in the outside world.
pv -- What a bunch of rubbish. The only 'relevance' you have here is
to demonstrate the utter depths of mental cruelty that can be
exhibited in Usenet. Think of 'punching in the emotional gut,' the
mother who had just had her son murdered by calling her perverse.
desi -- { snip rest as it was based on a false premise }
pv -- Yeah, right... it is a perfectly correct OBSERVATION of fact, not
any 'premise.' The observation that you demonstrate racism,
anti-Americanism, homophobia, lies, egocentricity, sexual perversion,
*giggles* over every tragedy, mindless drivel, personal insults,
bigotry, and a number of other rather disgusting flaws in your
character such as a lack of dignity, embarrassment, or honor.
I have provided PROOF from your own words regarding each of
these defects in your character, and you know it.
>> And as I pointed out only a few days ago, I could make the most
>> outrageously racist statements in here, and when you quote them back to the
>> group, they are immediately considered 'false'.
> Obviously, that's again simply trying to pound 10 pounds of shit, into a
> 5 pound bag. When YOU make 'outrageous racist statements,' then
> in the 'eye' of any rational observer, you ARE a racist. One who 'talks
> the talk,' is obviously 'walking the walk.'
desi -- Again, you fail to comprehend, and I'm sorry but I don't write Russian, so
I can't make it any easier for you. Perhaps I should just 'accuse' (sic)
you of writing 'plonk' ..? *snort*
pv -- I am not in denial. You are. One only needs to read English, and
YOUR OWN words to recognize you are a racist. Shit... I COULD
post in Russian, and everyone would STILL recognize you as a
racist from YOUR OWN words. You 'accuse' yourself, ol' Bubblehead.
>> So the 'quotes' (sic)
>> below, are of no importance whatsoever, as the mere fact that _you_ quote
>> them, means that no one will believe them.
>>
>> And yet still you dance ...
> Once again... your use of (sic), forms the image of God stamping
> "LOSER" on your forehead. But strangely enough, you say "below,"
> yet conveniently CLIP that "below," attempting to hide your own
> quotes, without even noting that you had 'clipped' it.
desi -- Any chance of getting that in English ?
pv -- Apparently English is not your Mother tongue. ho ho ho. You
said "So the 'quotes' (sic) below..." but you had clipped all those
quotes that you said were 'below.' Jesus, you're stupid. Oops...
that's not PC. Okay... you're just delusional, thinking something
is 'below,' when it isn't there.