After trying Pan 0.9.7 and finding it so buggy as to be unusable, went
back to 0.9.6 which is far better, thats ok on my RH6.2 box (2.4.5-ac14
kernel), now on the RH7.1 box with the same kernel, Pan crashes all the
time, no not segfaults just stops dead, needs a kill -9 to kill it.
Any thoughts?
maybee back to slrn :-)
--
David
Sydney, Australia
www.ozetechnology.com
ICQ: 29874849
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 01:21:01 GMT, The Martian <wats...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>After trying Pan 0.9.7 and finding it so buggy as to be unusable, went
>back to 0.9.6 which is far better, thats ok on my RH6.2 box (2.4.5-ac14
>kernel), now on the RH7.1 box with the same kernel, Pan crashes all the
>time, no not segfaults just stops dead, needs a kill -9 to kill it.
--
The warranty and liability expired as you read this message.
If the above breaks your system, it's yours and you keep both pieces.
Practice safe computing. Backup the file before you change it.
Do a, man command_here or cat command_here, before using it.
> Hi
>
> After trying Pan 0.9.7 and finding it so buggy as to be unusable, went
> back to 0.9.6 which is far better, thats ok on my RH6.2 box (2.4.5-ac14
> kernel), now on the RH7.1 box with the same kernel, Pan crashes all the
> time, no not segfaults just stops dead, needs a kill -9 to kill it.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> maybee back to slrn :-)
>
Sorry I can't help with your 0.9.6 problem, did you read the revision
history on the Pan site?
I also switched back to 0.9.6 after 0.9.7pre just crashed all the time.
Tried 0.9.7 final a couple of days ago, more bugs! It did not display
message counts correctly, AND when I marked threads/messages as read,
they would show up as unread the next day!
Gota say, I am happy with 0.9.6......
--
Wayne A. Osborn, SCADA Engineer.[dnar AT iinet DOT net DOT au]
Registered Linux User #212818. [2.2.16-22-Win4Lin-686] [i686]
10:10pm up 5 days, 6:06, 3 users, load average: 2.03, 2.05, 2.00
...This login session: $13.76, but for you $11.88.
In article <20010705.222139....@Criten.RedDwarf>, "Wayne
Reason I wanted to upgrade is that after I delete headers from a group
they continue to show up the next time I open Pan. Big pain to go back
and review all of those headers again. It is really pretty clumsy when
you compare it to Agent.
Oh well, maybe 10.0
0.9.6 is not exactly wonderfull, there are bugs etc, unstable under RH7.1
etc, but still much better than the unusable 0.9.7.
> After trying Pan 0.9.7 and finding it so buggy as to be unusable, went
> back to 0.9.6 which is far better, thats ok on my RH6.2 box (2.4.5-ac14
> kernel), now on the RH7.1 box with the same kernel, Pan crashes all the
> time
Sounds like a GUI rendering problem to me. Maybe your Gnome, GTK or
Sawfish libraries are incompatible? Try running Pan from a shell prompt
and see what error messages you get.