DS9 Spoiler: Lynch's Spoiler Review: "Duet"
Tim Lynch
Review by Tim Lynch <tly...@juliet.caltech.edu>
===============================================
WARNING: This article is a review of DS9's "Duet", and as such contains lots
and lots of spoilers. If you don't want to see them, don't read the article.
Wow. Now *that* is the sort of show I wish DS9 could do every week.
Aside from a niggling little question I have about the show's internal logic,
"Duet" was virtually everything anyone could have hoped for. It probably
won't appeal to everyone, particularly those who want lots of action in their
stories -- but it certainly appealed to me.
First, the very minor glitches, since we can then get them out of the way.
Neither is particularly unexplainable, but both seem a bit odd. To start
with, if one assumes Marritza only planned this recently, assuming Gul
Darheel's face to begin with has no conceivable motive other than hero
worship, which doesn't seem likely for Marritza. Okay, so maybe he had it
planned for five years. More importantly, though, I would imagine that
Marritza altering his face to look _exactly_ like a war hero dead only a year
would be the sort of newsworthy item Gul Dukat should have been aware of. It
might have taken him a little while to remember it, but that's not something
that just gets ignored. (Could you imagine if someone had plastic surgery to
look _exactly_ like John F. Kennedy in 1964, for instance? The news media
would have had a field day.)
Neither one of those is a particularly big deal, though -- they annoyed me
enough after the fact to be worth mentioning, but did nothing during the show
itself.
This is the first week in a long while for DS9 where I have managed to do
very little but sit totally caught up in the show on first viewing. For an
hour, I found myself caring about very little but who Marritza really was and
what would become of him. That is testament to a very, very strong show.
The writing was among the strongest the series has had to date. "Duet" had a
very simple, very stark idea that could _never_, _ever_ have been done on TNG
(unlike most other DS9 episodes). TNG is too optimistic -- even the idea of
dealing with a 24th-century version of Nazi war criminals would probably be
rejected quickly. Lisa Rich and Jeanne Carrigan Fauci, who came up with the
story, apparently decided it was time to put the issue in a Trek context --
and it worked like a charm.
A great, great portion of that can be due to Harris Yulin's absolutely
stunning portrayal of Marritza. Yulin, and thus Marritza, was totally and
completely believable in all of his various guises, particularly that of Gul
Darheel. The Cardassians have been built up as a basically evil and
no-good-to-anyone race here and in TNG; however, there are only two
Cardassians who I've ever felt were well and truly hateful. One was Gul
Madred, from the marvelous "Chain of Command, Part II" -- and the other was
"Gul Darheel", here.
Gul Darheel is the first Trek guest character in a long time that I have
literally wanted to get up and take a swing at. Marritza's "what
atrocities?" was bad enough, given the frightening rise of Holocaust
revisionism these days, but Darheel's utter megalomania and lack of reason
towards any subject whatsoever turned him into, not a villain, but a VILLAIN.
Kira has a lot more self-control than I do, I guess.
Yulin's portrayal of "Darheel" brought to mind two comments while he was
baiting Kira, and particularly when he was trying to get her to talk about
herself. Those two comments were:
"If this guy had been assigned to break Picard, Picard might have broken."
and
"Quid pro quo, Doctor..."
The latter, for those not familiar with it, is from "The Silence of the
Lambs". I think my point is pretty clear -- Yulin, at least for me, made
Darheel one of Trek's most _chilling_ characters.
Enough about him, at least for now. Marc Alaimo did his usual nice job as a
Cardassian leader -- Dukat isn't evil per se, he's simply a very slimy bad
guy. Alaimo originated the very first Cardassian Gul back in TNG's "The
Wounded", and he's still the best at that particular type of Cardassian. He
was fun to watch, as usual.
Beyond Marritza, however, the focus was on Kira, and as such the writing and
acting surrounding her assumes great importance. And for the third time in a
row, both writing and acting for Kira have come through when the chips were
down. Nearly everything was good in "Battle Lines", and nearly everything
was good in "Progress" -- and if I may be so bold, _everything_ was good
here for her.
Nana Visitor seemed somewhat overshadowed by Yulin during all her scenes with
him, which is unfortunate, but she certainly held up her end well enough
despite that. From her calm "I'll ask [the questions] anyway" to her
smugness at "catching" Marritza in a lie, to her final concern, everything
rang completely and utterly true. I can't put my finger on anything that
stood out as "yes! This is terrific stuff!" with her, but that may simply be
due to her style: she tends to build up scenes rather than carry them away
with her, a la Patrick Stewart. Very, very nice, in any case.
When the show centers this strongly on very intense psychological conflict
between two characters, I tend to think that the best directors stay the hell
out of the way. By that, I mean that very little stands out while you're
watching as Good Direction [TM], because you're too busy watching the show.
(Bad directors, on the other hand, leave ugly footprints all over the place
so that you keep having to wonder what's really going on.)
By those standards, at least, James L. Conway certainly did well. I was
caught up enough in the show that it basically seemed to direct itself. A
couple of directing bits do come to mind, but ones separate from the
Kira/Marritza scenes, where the above criterion is most important. (The
camera angles during the Kira/Odo scene after one of her conversations with
Marritza, for instance, caught my eye, though I'm not sure why.) For the
most part, however, Conway fell under the heading of "directors who are good
up to the point that you don't notice them", which in this case was
wonderful. (It wouldn't have worked for something like "Cause and Effect",
though, where presentation and packaging becomes more essential.)
One particular FX shot caught my eye also. The scene where the crew is
examining the picture of the Gallitepp camp seemed very reminiscent of "Blade
Runner" in the image enhancement. Given that I'm a big BR fan, the
comparison was invited -- but I think it's worth mentioning anyway.
And then, of course, there's the ending. I was about to say that we wouldn't
see an ending this bleak on TNG either, but a few counterexamples have just
sprung to mind (like "Silicon Avatar"). Regardless, it was an extremely dark
and an extremely grim ending. Kira had already begun to learn her lesson,
but the run-in with Marritza's assassin really drove the point home, both to
her and to us. She came face to face with the Kira she was a year, or even a
few months ago -- and she didn't seem to enjoy the meeting one bit. I hope
this is something we see repercussions of next season. (I also hope that we
see the provisional government's reaction to the whole mess.)
Quite honestly, I don't think I've that much else to say on "Duet". It was
virtually a masterwork from start to finish. (I think O'Brien's scene with
his aide and Quark's little bit with the survivors were both a bit
superfluous, but both also lasted all of ten seconds, so who really cares?)
By the end of it, I felt put through a wringer -- even on a second viewing.
It was _that_ intense, and _that_ good. If DS9 could do this every week,
we'd be in wonderful shape. Perhaps in a year or two.
So, the numbers:
Plot: 9.5. Again, the logic of some of the closing bits has me puzzled, but
that's all.
Plot Handling: 10. Marvelous.
Characterization: 10, since 20 appears not to be valid. :-)
TOTAL: 10, for the first time in a long while. (This may also be the first
time both TNG and DS9 have been 10's for me. Wow -- the summer must be
making me generous. :-) )
NEXT WEEK:
Religious fanaticism comes to the final frontier.
Tim Lynch (Harvard-Westlake School, Science Dept.)
BITNET: tlynch@citjulie
INTERNET: tly...@juliet.caltech.edu
UUCP: ...!ucbvax!tlynch%juliet.ca...@hamlet.caltech.edu
"What you call genocide, I call a day's work."
-- Marritza, as "Gul Darheel"
--
Copyright 1993, Timothy W. Lynch. All rights reserved, but feel free to ask...
Janis Maria C. C. Cortese
>[DS9] Lynch's Spoiler Review: "Duet"
>Review by Tim Lynch <tly...@juliet.caltech.edu>
>===============================================
>
>WARNING: This article is a review of DS9's "Duet", and as such contains lots
>and lots of spoilers. If you don't want to see them, don't read the article.
>Wow. Now *that* is the sort of show I wish DS9 could do every week.
[LOTS deleted]
>It was _that_ intense, and _that_ good. If DS9 could do this every week,
>we'd be in wonderful shape. Perhaps in a year or two.
I'm forced to disagree with these two statements; a weekly show CAN'T
run the characters like this all the time. They'd burn out. You can't
give everyone a major life-shattering epiphany over and over.
"Duet" literally shocked me to the point where I'm having a very hard
time writing a review for it for the SFLA&E/BS; I seriously couldn't
handle being put through that once a week for the next seven years. You
need lightness every now and then.
HOWever, I agree with you vis a vis everything else. On a scale of 1 to
10, this one's a 1,000. I haven't seen much television AT ALL that did
this to me, that was this riveting -- much less Trek. I have a feeling
that the writers are using DS9 (or may be going to use it) as a way to
write all those Trek stories they wanted to write but were told, "Now,
now. That's not the sort of image we want to present," when they
suggested them for TNG.
Regards,
Janis the net.proud.hussy
Janis Cortese || President and Founder: SEFEB, and The ||
cor...@skid.ps.uci.edu || Society of People Who Would Love to ||
UCIrvine Linguistics, || Shove a Stick Up Rush Limbaugh's Ass; ||
for a while more anyway || and Member of The Star Trek Ladies' ||
Irvine, California || Auxiliary and Embroidery/Baking Society ||
====================================================================||
I used to be a bitch and just thought it was my problem. ||
Now, I've learned to make it everyone else's problem, too. ||
=====================DEATH BEFORE BELLBOTTOMS!======================||
Frank Burleigh
>In article <1vsfjv...@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> tly...@Juliet.Caltech.Edu (Tim Lynch) writes:
>>[DS9] Lynch's Spoiler Review: "Duet"
>>Review by Tim Lynch <tly...@juliet.caltech.edu>
>>===============================================
>>
>>WARNING: This article is a review of DS9's "Duet", and as such contains lots
>>and lots of spoilers. If you don't want to see them, don't read the article.
>
>>Wow. Now *that* is the sort of show I wish DS9 could do every week.
>[LOTS deleted]
>>It was _that_ intense, and _that_ good. If DS9 could do this every week,
>>we'd be in wonderful shape. Perhaps in a year or two.
>I'm forced to disagree with these two statements; a weekly show CAN'T
>run the characters like this all the time. They'd burn out. You can't
>give everyone a major life-shattering epiphany over and over.
Perhaps not--but DS9 has quite a long way to go to make up for a
season of stories most of which I've found either marginally
interesting or damaged by the implementation. Even in this story
(which I liked a lot because it *told me something* and hence fit
my idea of what Star Trek ought to be) I felt Ms Visitor's acting
didn't do justice to the story.
>"Duet" literally shocked me to the point where I'm having a very hard
>time writing a review for it for the SFLA&E/BS; I seriously couldn't
>handle being put through that once a week for the next seven years. You
>need lightness every now and then.
They've given us enough lightness *for* seven years, in my opinion. ;-)
>HOWever, I agree with you vis a vis everything else. On a scale of 1 to
>10, this one's a 1,000. I haven't seen much television AT ALL that did
>this to me, that was this riveting -- much less Trek. I have a feeling
>that the writers are using DS9 (or may be going to use it) as a way to
>write all those Trek stories they wanted to write but were told, "Now,
>now. That's not the sort of image we want to present," when they
>suggested them for TNG.
It seems to me TNG has given us plenty of such stories.
--
Frank Burleigh
Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
CIS 72730,1017; Internet burl...@ogre.cica.indiana.edu; Bitnet burleigh@iubacs