Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Impressions of WABI/Univel vs Linux

2 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Charles Anderson

unread,
Jul 2, 1993, 11:54:59 AM7/2/93
to
In article <geoffw.7...@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU> geo...@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Geoffrey Warren Hicks) writes:
|
|Posted on behalf of Craig Southeren who does not have access to
|a net account:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
| Then the sales-droid came over and tried to impress us by asking
|how we liked using a a brand new Pentium machine that they had
|borrowed from Compaq just for the show. If it takes a Pentium to
|make Windows run under Solaris at a decent speed...

I saw wabi running under Solaris 2.2 at the Solaris Dev conference, and
it was running on non pentium machines and seemed to be zipping along
pretty good. I asked the sun demoers how fast it ran on a sparc instead
of a x86 box. They said the window manipulation ran faster than the intel
but any time it was doing something like a spreadsheet recalc it was about
3x slower. Overall I was fairly impressed with the speed of Solaris on
the intel, but I am much more impressed with the price of linux, so that
is what I run.

-Charlie
--
/-Charles-Anderson-\ | c...@c2s.mn.org TIP#068
\------------------/ | Com Squared Systems, voice (612) 452-9522
Vidi Vici Veni - I Saw, | 1285 Corporate Center Drive fax (612) 452-3607
I Conquered, I Came | Suite 170 | Eagan, MN 55121 (I speak for myself)

Bob Amstadt

unread,
Jul 2, 1993, 1:36:48 PM7/2/93
to
Of course, for those of you who are interested in running Windows programs
there is an effort in progress to create something similar to Sun's WABI.
There is an activists channel, "WABI", for discussion of this project.
There is need for many volunteers to complete this project.
--
Bob Amstadt
b...@amscons.com

Budi Rahardjo

unread,
Jul 4, 1993, 10:21:55 AM7/4/93
to
I have a copy of WABI (demo)... and run it on a Sparc 10.
Sure it is nice, but there are still too many bugs.
I can crash it easily (every session it crashes at least
3 times for me). It's nice for a demo, but I wouldn't use
it for a production.

Let's get back to Linux.

-- budi
--
Budi Rahardjo <Budi_R...@UManitoba.Ca>
Unix Support - Computer Services - University of Manitoba

Carlo James Calica

unread,
Jul 5, 1993, 3:49:16 PM7/5/93
to
In article <C9n98...@ccu.umanitoba.ca> rah...@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Budi Rahardjo) writes:
>I have a copy of WABI (demo)... and run it on a Sparc 10.
>Sure it is nice, but there are still too many bugs.
>I can crash it easily (every session it crashes at least
>3 times for me). It's nice for a demo, but I wouldn't use
>it for a production.
>
Hmmm. Sounds like a perfect Windows emulation to me :-).

--
/------------------------------+--------------------------------------\
| Carlo J. Calica | Linux: Choice of the GNU Generation |
| cal...@cae.wisc.edu | Dittos from the People's |
\ University of Wisconsin | Republic of Madison /

James Mitchell

unread,
Jul 7, 1993, 11:52:15 AM7/7/93
to
<1993Jul2.1...@amscons.com> <C9n98...@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever


In article <C9n98...@ccu.umanitoba.ca> rah...@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Budi
Rahardjo) writes:
>I have a copy of WABI (demo)... and run it on a Sparc 10.
>Sure it is nice, but there are still too many bugs.
>I can crash it easily (every session it crashes at least
>3 times for me). It's nice for a demo, but I wouldn't use
>it for a production.


So sue 'em... WABI sounds at least as reliable as Windows 3.0...
0 new messages