Pol Pot clearly confessed to the world and his Khmer children
SLK
Cambodia
20 years ago, when the Cambodian refugees first came to live in
Australia and in other parts of the world, many of us could neither
speak nor write English at all so we could not explain what was
happening to our country from 1975 to 1979.
Many Australians and Europeans didn't even know what Cambodia was in
those days? They only knew Thailand and Vietnam. My Australian friend,
with whom I used to living, asked me what is Khmer? His question
really consternated me. When he asked me like that? I was really all
at sea to hear what he asked me? And in those days, my English was
terrible. I spoke a little English, so I could not explain to them
what was happening to Cambodia. I only explained to them that Thailand
and South Vietnam are belong to Khmers. And I also told them that the
Killing Fields was created by Vietnamese agents everywhere in Cambodia
who could speak and write Khmer very fluently by using the Khmer
Rouges' hands to kill Khmers.
Vietnamese agents, in those days, in Australia and in many parts of
the world, were so happy to unshamefacedly bullshit to the world that
Khmer Rouge killed their own people from 1975 to 1979. But so
luckily, there are so many foreign writers who also know too much
about Khmer histories writing to let the world and Khmer children know
Vietnamese dirty plans against Khmers as Simon Ross put here in his
book about Subjugation of Cambodia:
Hanoi's ultimate objective though was the total subjugation of all
Indochina-Cambodia, Kampuchea Krom and Laos. For centuries Vietnam had
sought the abundant granary that is the Cambodian heartland, having
earlier pilfered the Mekong Delta from the Khmers. Vietnam is long and
thin country with limited arable land and a large population and her
cropland is often subject to natures whim. But Vietnam's ambition to
control Phnom Penh had to be unobtrusive and so Hanoi covertly sought
domination of the Cambodian Communist Movement from the inside and the
eventual placing in power in Phnom Penh of these puppet Khmer
Communists. That was why North Vietnam had filtered the 4000 Khmer
Communists to Hanoi after the 1954 Geneva Conference: to train and
brainwash them, and release them into Cambodia en masse to take charge
of the Cambodian Communist Movement when the time seemed ripe. That
time looked to be from 1970 until now.
As Cambodia Watching down under put like this:
PP.81-82:
All things being equal the Vietnamese liberation is the preferable of
the two evils (ie. Evil for the liberal, benign for the ideological
supporters of Vietnamese communism.)
The invading Vietnamese themselves and the Cambodians who accompanied
them faced hardly any resistance. Indeed, the evidence suggests that
nearly everyone in Cambodia regarded the Vietnamese as having saved
them from the horrors of the Pol Pot regime.(Geoffrey C. Gunn
Jefferson Lee)
When Pol Pot clearly confessed to the world and his Khmer children in
1997 before he died in 1998 about Vietnamese dirty plans against
Khmers. His words really stunned and turned the world upside down to
stake a big bar/stick into Vietnamese leaders’ rectums in
Vietnam. Vietnamese authorities ordered their people to collect
English Newspapers in every hotel to be burnt to ash because they felt
shamed when they read those articles were revealed by Pol Pot. (SBS
Radio, broadcasting in Khmer from Sydney)
Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge:
When I was in France. I didn't understand much, but in Cambodia I
progressed because in Cambodia, I didn't have contact with the
bourgeoisie because my degree was ordinary. But I had contact with the
monks, the lower class and the common people. That's why I understand
the problem. I didn't copy anyone. I'm not a special person but I was
educated in Europe. Seeing the inequality saddened me. So as for your
question about what model I followed. It's a combination of things,
but I was mainly influenced by what I saw in my country.
Since I was young. This has been my nature. I'm not a very talkative
person. I could mention the author who interviewed me, Jacque Verges.
He wrote that he knew me for 20 or 30 years as a polite, discreet
young man and I don't know what else. I don't want to appear to be a
leader. And if friends asked me what my background was, I would say,
first I was a very hard worker. Second, it was by luck that I became
the party secretary. No one else would take that position but me. I
refused, but they insisted.
Please understand, with my high level of work, I only made decisions
concerning the very important people. I didn't supervise the lower
ranks. These men joined and led the Democratic of Kampuchea Party but
they weren't real members. What I have mentioned occurred in 1976 and
1977.
This group hatched a plot to carry out a coup and topple me, the
party leader and kill me. This group was involved with the Vietnamese.
I don't remember everything but I have documents to prove the plot.
There was someone called Ya. Ya had been a Vietnamese agent since
1946. (SBS August-September 2002)
Before Pol Pot, died in 1998, clearly revealed to the world that he
didn't liberate his country for killing his own people. But the
Vietnamese carried on the Killing fields was shown on Channel 10 at
6pm in Australia. And he pointed one of his fingers to himself; you
look at me. Am I a cruel man? Cambodian history will judge me one day!
Without me, there would be no Cambodia anymore!
Cambodia watching down under
Geoffrey C. Gunn
Jefferson Lee, July 1991
P.36:
After all it was the Khmer Rouge who felt betrayed by Hanoi's 1973
peace agreement with Nixon. Totally miscalculating the extent of their
defeat thousands of Khmer republic personnel were systemically
murdered by the enemy; Long Boret (Republican Prime Minister), Lon Non
(Lon Nol's brother), Keth Dara (who staged a theatrical false
liberation of the city on the 17th), Sirik Matak (Sihanouk's royal
rival), Ung Bun Hor (president of the national Assembly) all died in
agony as the DK regime later put about. Lon Nol, then 71 years old,
had made an early exit and died ten years later in California.
P.119:
Vietnam has behaved deplorably breached the most fundamental rules of
human decency.
Simon Ross, 1983. Subjugation of Cambodia:
P.74:
A friend in Phnom Penh had been adamant: "You will see. North Vietnam
made our war because they want Cambodians to kill Cambodians. Then
when there are no more of us left, they will come and take our
country."
And when I asked others what they foresaw, the invariable reply was
After the Khmer Rouge will come the Vietnamese.
The people of Phnom Penh were broodingly certain Hanoi's would
eventually move to conquer Cambodia, either using the Khmer Rouge as
pawns or else extermination them.
Bearing this theory in mind, I followed intently all developments in
the years after 1975 and, relating apparently insignificant remarks
and moves by Hanoi and Moscow to the context of my friends'
convection, it became apparent they were right. Hanoi was indeed
hell-bent on eventually subjugating Cambodia.
P.75:
Quite true, The Cambodian people had lost everything: their freedom,
their families, their houses, their land, their possessions, their
religion, their culture, their tradition peasant ways. Nearly on third
had also lost their lives.
All former Lon Nol soldiers were killed; public servants, doctors,
nurses, teachers, students and all other professions also
exterminated. Cambodia had 60,000 Buddhists bonzes in her population
of just seven million. All monks were derobed, many of them killed.
P.77:
By mid-1976 it was apparent that the nation Laos functioned merely as
a province of Vietnam and was totally dominated by Hanoi.
The Pathet Lao had believed they were fighting to free Laos from
foreign interference (French and American) but now found they had
fought and suffered only to see control of their country pass to
Hanoi. They could now see they had been betrayed. But Hanoi had placed
an occupation army of 40, 000 to quell any Laotian dissent.
Yes, North Vietnamese liberated us, said one Lao refugee in Thailand.
“They liberated us of our crops, of our beasts, of our prettiest
girls and even of our country.
Clearly, the same scenario had been planned for Cambodia, but the
frantic nationalism of the Khmer Rouge was blocking Hanoi. Aha! Pol
Pot was completely destroying Hanoi's schemes on time.
The Vietnamese were aware of the Pol Pot genocide yet made absolutely
no attempt to inform the outside world of it. They remained silent,
hopefully they could plot an internal coup by the surviving
Hanoi-Khmers to topple Pol Pot and thus put themselves in power.
Failing that, they would have to invade to seize control of Cambodia.
Either way, the last thing Hanoi wanted was an international outcry
over the Khmer Rouge atrocities, because world uproar might have led
to United Nations military intervention in Cambodia, which would have
foiled Hanoi's plan for future conquest.
Talks between Hanoi and Democratic Kampuchea had been fruitless
throughout all of 1975 and 1976, Pol Pot claiming from the start that
Hanoi's sole aim was to annex Cambodia into an Indochinese
Confederation.
P.81:
Throughout 1978 Russian ships brought military and logistic supplies
into Vietnam in preparation for the invasion. Hanoi began describing
that country as Hell on Earth-something she had known since mi-1975
but kept discreetly silent about.
P.82:
Vietnam had massed 120,000 troops along Cambodia's border by
Christmas 1978. On January 2 1979, their armoured assault began with
heavy air support. The kampuchean United Front army tagged along,
doing no fighting while North Vietnam tanks roared unopposed down the
main highways all the way across Cambodia to the Thai border.
P.94:
Hanoi won the war but is rapidly losing the peace. The current
economic situation of Vietnam is chronic. Inflation is doubling
prices. Hanoi has printed a large amount of unbacked currency;
Vietnamese has just enough foreign currency to buy but one week of
imports; she can not pay any interest on any foreign debt to
non-communist countries.
On the back:
The nation bearing responsibility for the Cambodian tragedy is not the
United States but North Vietnam. For centuries Vietnam has coveted the
fertile rice basin of Cambodia; for decades the Vietnamese Communist
Party plotted to subjugate Cambodia and Laos into an Indo-China
Federation dominated by Hanoi.
Since January 1979, Cambodian escapees have told that the Vietnamese
liberators of Cambodia are little better: that Hanoi inducted the
famine of 1979-80; that Hanoi is swamping Cambodia with Vietnamese
immigrants settlers; that Hanoi will eventually absorb Cambodia
entirely. Again, though, the desperate words of the Khmer people go
unheeded.
That's why William Shawcross wrote his book "The Destruction of
Cambodia" in 1986, that "Nixon (US President) evidently believed in
1973 (and still in 1978) that the Khmer Rouge were controlled by Hanoi
and were amenable to Moscow."
Norodom Sihanouk clearly stated:
P.88:
Another important step in the first phase was eliminating Pol Pot's
fervent cadres, yet taking salvageable Khmer Rouge and the regimes
slaves to Vietnam. In this way the Vietnamese were able to bring ten
of thousands of kampuchean civilians into their country in January
1978.
Shortly after the voluntary retreat of Giap's troops on January 6,
1978, the Khmer Rouge complained of renewed attempts to overthrow the
government by Vietnamese agents. (War & Hope, William Shawcross, 1980.
Prince Norodom Sihanouk.)
Therefore, the Khmer Rouges were Vietnamese, and the Vietnamese were
Khmer Rouge who brutally killed our close relatives and parents.
That's why after peace agreement signed in Paris in 1991, Khieu
Samphan went to Cambodia, who was near-lynched by a mob, by clearly
telling to the world and his Khmer children: We can't catch fish in
muddy water, but when the muddy water becomes clearer. We will catch
them all. What he meant is that Cambodian society is today deeply
divided, in disarray and scattering while the Kampuchean people
distrusted or hated other each badly, but when all Cambodians come
together one day, especially we are united altogether. We will surely
catch all fish that ate Khmers from 1975-79. The ripe time will come,
and all Khmer Rouge leaders/cadres will go to confess to the world,
who was wearing secret balaclava to murder Khmers from 1975-79? Pol
Pot already stunned the world with his clearest confession before he
died in 1998. He's a real greatest hero on earth, who dares sacrifice
his life to dominate the world attention, wasn't afraid of being
strongly condemned by his own people and the world. But he really
terribly shook the world, with 2000 000 Cambodian lives lost. All the
communists around the globe were completely collapsed once and for
all.
Leng-SK
Indravarman
Dear SLK,
It's informative post. I believed that viets train Khmer rouge.
Phnom99
It is informative and it is straight to the points that is the most fear factor
for the real killer whom have been hiding behind the KR uniform in Cambodia.
Sok sour sdey!
>stake a big bar/stick into Vietnamese leaders rectums in
The Rabbit News
this kind of comments yet since the fall of Khmer Rouge regime.
Can you tell us where to find them ?
"SLK" <tapr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:17b70019.03022...@posting.google.com...
Indravarman
I don't think you will do a good job finding. This pieces of
information don't shed any light in to your brain.
> I surely would love to find any documents prove the claim.
> "SLK" <tapr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > Pol Pot clearly confessed to the world about Vietnamese agents in
The Rabbit News
without any merrits at all. This is the type of people the Cambodian people
are.
They blame Vietnamese for their own killing in Cambodia furing the Khmer
Rouge.
They blame Vietnamese for their own intimidation by their own people in
their own country.
They blame Vietnamese for their own weaknesses.
Now, they are turning to blame on Thailand.
WHERE IS THEIR OWN RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR OWN ACTS?
Is it not a stupid act to do such a way as we've seen?
"Indravarman" <Phn...@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:71fb8f12.03022...@posting.google.com...
Indravarman
THE RABBIT IS MENTALLY SICKED! Saying what old rabbit??????
> So what it means that you have been saying things from
STUPIT AND BLIND OLD RABBIT!!!
This is the type of people the Cambodian people
> are.
YOU ARE A SICKED VIETCONG ROTTEN BLIND STUPIT!!!!!!
> They blame Vietnamese for their own killing in Cambodia furing the Khmer
> Rouge.
The Rabbit News
who are against your view.
It means that your view doesn't have any juice to it.
"Indravarman" <Phn...@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:71fb8f12.03022...@posting.google.com...
Indravarman
Yes... your view is blind and sicked!
> Furthermore, it means that you really don't have anything to contest someone
> > > > > > P.36:
The Rabbit News
SUPPORT YOUR OWN CLAIM. Unfortunately, your attack of others doesn't make
your view any better. They are all still hearsays with no ground to support
them.
"Indravarman" <Phn...@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:71fb8f12.03022...@posting.google.com...
Indravarman
Nobody is agreeing with you. The good information about the Communist
took hostage rule of Cambodia for 3 years and 8 months was very well
written, and important information to read and learn.
> Thank you for agreeing with me that you REALLY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO
> >
> >
The Rabbit News
I really don't care who agrees with whom here.
My view is out there for anyone to read. One or all can ignore it, and it
would not bother me a bit.
I'm not here to be a famous person.
I'n not here to make friends. I can do that somewhere else.
I'm here ONLY TO VOICE MY OPINION.
"Indravarman" <Phn...@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:71fb8f12.0302...@posting.google.com...
Indravarman
Your view is pure junks!
One or all can ignore it, and it
Rotten posting make you famous?
> I'm not here to be a famous person.
> I'n not here to make friends. I can do that somewhere else.
Your opinion is like pol pot.
> I'm here ONLY TO VOICE MY OPINION.
SLK
> I surely would love to find any documents prove the claim. We have not heard
> this kind of comments yet since the fall of Khmer Rouge regime.
> Can you tell us where to find them ?
Please contact with SBS in Australia, if you really want those documents of Pol Pot.
Thank you
SLK
SLK
> So what it means that you have been saying things from your own brain
> without any merrits at all. This is the type of people the Cambodian people
> are.
> They blame Vietnamese for their own killing in Cambodia furing the Khmer
> Rouge.
> They blame Vietnamese for their own intimidation by their own people in
> their own country.
> They blame Vietnamese for their own weaknesses.
> Now, they are turning to blame on Thailand.
>
> WHERE IS THEIR OWN RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR OWN ACTS?
>
> Is it not a stupid act to do such a way as we've seen?
When we don't see anything on our own eyes, we blame something on
someone. But when we saw something they did to us with our own eyes,
they say to us that we are so stupid.
When we lost 21 provinces to Vietnamese known as South Vietnam today,
and 75 provinces to Thailand known as Khmer Surin in the West. The
world stay so queit. They blame us that we Khmer are
racists/xenophobia when we try to did up all the buried documents that
Khmers'hereditary foes-Yuon and Siam who have been secretly burying in
the ground!
My Vietnamese spoke to Vietnamese Bo Doi/soldiers who dressed up in
disguise as Khmer Rouge to collect their Vietnamese citizens living in
Cambodia to be sent back to South Vietnam in 1975 when we Khmers were
on the move.
Why were Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge so kind to let Vietnamese soldiers
who dressed up as KR just like that, or didn't Pol Pot know his
comrade-in-arm Vietnamese collecting their citizens living in Cambodia
happily and freely to be sent back...?
Hanoi leaders are so cunning who could defeat French and Americans by
using their brain, whereas Yankees and French used only their dicks to
play Chinese Kong Fu on bed with Yuon mistresses. That's why they lost
war to Vietcong and Vietminh.
So it's so easily for Yuon leaders who perfectly used their citizens
who can speak and write Khmer very fluently to work with KR as still
happening in Cambodia today.
Who today keep plundering, robbing, conquering, encraoching and eating
Khmer lands so far so worse? Who robbed 21 provinces in the East and
75 provinces in the West?
If you can answer above question. You can find who killed Cambodians
from 1975-79.
SLK
The Rabbit News
"SLK" <tapr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:17b70019.03030...@posting.google.com...
The Rabbit News
> "The Rabbit News" <therab...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:<RGs6a.3326$%Y2.970...@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>...
> > So what it means that you have been saying things from your own brain
> > without any merrits at all. This is the type of people the Cambodian
people
> > are.
> > They blame Vietnamese for their own killing in Cambodia furing the Khmer
> > Rouge.
> > They blame Vietnamese for their own intimidation by their own people in
> > their own country.
> > They blame Vietnamese for their own weaknesses.
> > Now, they are turning to blame on Thailand.
> >
> > WHERE IS THEIR OWN RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR OWN ACTS?
> >
> > Is it not a stupid act to do such a way as we've seen?
>
>
>
> When we don't see anything on our own eyes, we blame something on
> someone. But when we saw something they did to us with our own eyes,
> they say to us that we are so stupid.
>
Let's talk about it here. What we HAVE seen in Cambodia is stupid. There is
no doubt. Here is why?
The Monarchy lead by the prime minister Norodom Sihanouk cut the
relationship with USA so he could allow North Vietnam to use Cambodian soil
to transport troops and weapons to fight the war in South Vietnam. Cambodia
was supposed to be a neutral country. Sihanouk sold that neutral state to
China and Vietnam.
The Khmer Rouge and Sihanouk coalition used their Vietnamese support to
train and fight the war against their own people, Lon Nol regime. Khmer
Rouge, Sihanouk and Vietcongs were fighting side by side on their very own
soil so they could gain the power.
The Khmer Rouge and Sihanouk won the war. NVA won the war due to their full
access to utilize the Cambodian soil authorized by the Khmer Rouge and
Sihanouk.
The Khmer Rouge regime and Sihanouk gained the control over the country and
started their spiral technic to bring their nation down to ground zero. They
destroyed their nation and people so they could have the power. The genocide
was pioneered by the Khmer Rouge leadership and the Cambodian peasants who
were the superior race in their democratic of Kampuchea, Communist state.
Today, Sihanouk is trying to say that he was shackled in jail while those
killings were taken place. It was true. However, the scenerio occured only
after Sihanouk and his coalition fought and won the war. The Khmer Rouge
couldn't have won the war without Sihanouk and his sale of the Cambodian
neutrality. He is claiming that he too is a victim of the Khmer Rouge
genocide. No, Sihanouk is not a victim of the Khmer Rouge. Actually, he was
a part of the Khmer Rouge regime.
The Cambodian peasants have been doing the same exact thing. They are
claiming that they too are victims of the Khmer Rouge regime. What happened
to the responsibility of what they had done during the Khmer Rouge era? It's
disgusted to hear that they too are victims. It just can't be true. They
were parts of the genocide pioneers who killed millions of their own people.
Now, we have been hearing it all. The Cambodian people are trying to tell
the world that everything occured in Cambodia should be blamed on other
nations. They now blame the Khmer Rouge era on the Vietnam when the world
knows for fact that Khmer Rouge regime was isolating themselves from the
rest of the world. We also know now that Khmer Rouge regime invaded the
Vietnamese country side along the border. They even killed many Vietnamese
villagers. Is that the pioneer of Vietnamese?
I don't know what you call it.
I CALL IT "STUPIDITY".
> When we lost 21 provinces to Vietnamese known as South Vietnam today,
> and 75 provinces to Thailand known as Khmer Surin in the West. The
> world stay so queit. They blame us that we Khmer are
> racists/xenophobia when we try to did up all the buried documents that
> Khmers'hereditary foes-Yuon and Siam who have been secretly burying in
> the ground!
>
This is the Cambodian history,. and it might be true. No one is disputing
it.
Today is in the year 2003. The world is not living in the past. We are
moving forward. The world recognize the existance of Vietnam, Cambodia, and
Thailand. No matter how you look at it, those countries are independent
countries.
> My Vietnamese spoke to Vietnamese Bo Doi/soldiers who dressed up in
> disguise as Khmer Rouge to collect their Vietnamese citizens living in
> Cambodia to be sent back to South Vietnam in 1975 when we Khmers were
> on the move.
>
LET'S ASSUME THAT IT'S TRUE for the moment.
Those acts occured during the time that the Cambodian people fighting each
others. It means that they were weakening themselves to make themselves
vulnerable for the intrusion as you have been accusing.
So, the acts of the Cambodian people are still stupid.
I would do such thing when I know someone is trying to invade my family's
space. I WOULD STAND STRONG TO DEFEND MY FAMILY TO DEATH, not to weaken
myself so I can claim to be victims of others.
THAT IS STUPID.
> Why were Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge so kind to let Vietnamese soldiers
> who dressed up as KR just like that, or didn't Pol Pot know his
> comrade-in-arm Vietnamese collecting their citizens living in Cambodia
> happily and freely to be sent back...?
>
Who are Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge?
Are telling us that those poeple are Vietnamese too?
If they are Cambodians, they too are stupid.
Ofcourse, the acts of the Cambodian part is very stupid.
> Hanoi leaders are so cunning who could defeat French and Americans by
> using their brain, whereas Yankees and French used only their dicks to
> play Chinese Kong Fu on bed with Yuon mistresses. That's why they lost
> war to Vietcong and Vietminh.
>
It was also stupid for Sihanouk and Khmer Rouge to allow NVA to use the
Cambodian soil to fight the war in South Vietnam.
That was selling the Cambodian neutrality.
Is it stupid?
Ofcourse,.......
> So it's so easily for Yuon leaders who perfectly used their citizens
> who can speak and write Khmer very fluently to work with KR as still
> happening in Cambodia today.
>
Who are those embedded Vietnamese agents who worked within the Khmer Rouge
regime?
Can you name one or two of them?
> Who today keep plundering, robbing, conquering, encraoching and eating
> Khmer lands so far so worse? Who robbed 21 provinces in the East and
> 75 provinces in the West?
>
It may be true that the Vietnamese has been doing such thing. It still
doesn't excuse Cambodians from being stupid.
> If you can answer above question. You can find who killed Cambodians
> from 1975-79.
>
You just got a whole lot of facts according to my views. What else can you
tell us differntly?
rania
How do you know all these storytell in Cambodia?
Were you related to King Sihanouk?
---
rania
> It doesn't seem to work, does it?
Why do you hate your home country so much? If you do
and why are you always here?
See? You just can't go away and pretending to hate your own country,
but why you're her 24 hours?
Luk Oum Dara Ea oy sathooot.
------------------------------
The Rabbit News
behavior. Yours is unique. It is representing the culture of the Cambodian
people themselves very well. Look at it.
The Cambodian people have been fighting each others and cannot accept the
responsibility for their own acts. We have seen it time again endlessly.
They even went further to get people to believe that evil events in Cambodia
had been orchestrated by some foreigners. This is not the worse scenerio
yet.
Even when it's true that the events were orchestrated by foreigners, the
Cambodians themselves have always carried the acts in their own country, on
their own people.
This is the type of behavior that you have been displaying.
That's why I call it "STUPIDITY".
You might call it something else.
I certainly don't see it except stupid.
"rania" <rani...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b43snv$1ra3k2$1...@ID-150982.news.dfncis.de...
> The Rabbit News wrote:
>
> > It doesn't seem to work, does it?
>
> Why do you hate your home country so much? If you do
> and why are you always here?
>
> See? You just can't go away and pretending to hate your own country,
> but why you're her 24 hours?
>