Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Brad hops into bed with Bullis yet again

0 views
Skip to first unread message

ThePsyko

unread,
Sep 20, 2002, 4:53:39 PM9/20/02
to
On 20 Sep 2002 in that fucked up hellhole known as
alt.hackers.malicious, an identity claiming to be Anonymous spewed forth
news:ee8067b3109e65de...@remailer.privacy.at:

> At least Bullis can afford to have his name known. I think "Just
> Taylor" is likely more of a criminal and even more of a pedo than
> Bullis!! This opinion is based on some web sites I've see. These web
> sites are not anonymous and thus are credible. I personally think
> Bullis at least is accountable for his actions and he is not hiding in
> every way like a pussy coward like "Just Taylor" seems to be. It is
> obvious and damned funny even from Bullis' web page that "Taylor" is
> upset and hiding and that is really funny. Anyhow, I think everyone
> can now see that "Taylor" is a sniping punk who must hide (probably to
> keep from going to jail for peddling porn!!) Hey, Bullis may be a
> buyer, but it looks like "Just Taylor" is a SELLER from what I have
> read!!!! Here is the funny squirming done even by an anonymous
> coward and he does this squirming on RtS's web page which the poor
> sorry anon coward can't bring down. This is funny don't you agree.
>
> http://taylorjimenez.com
>
>>This fictional character known as Taylor Jimenez has now threatened to
>>sue Affinity Internet Inc. over the content of this site. In a letter
>>sent to me dated 8-27-02 from Affinity's attorney, a Mr. W David Snead
>>of Wash. D.C., Mr. Jimenez made it clear, that if this site continued
>>after August 12th 2002 that Mr. Jimenez would begin legal proceedings
>>in civil court against Affinity Internet Inc.
>
>>Within the letter enclosed, Mr. Jimenez clealy stated that at the time
>>such civil suit is filed, he will then positively identify himself and
>>his attorney's so that Affinity will know whom they are dealing with.
>
> AN ANON GUY SQUIRMING WHO SHOULD REALLY THINK ALL OF THIS IS FUNNY IF
> HE WAS NOT SANFORD WALLACE OR IF HE WAS SUCCESSFULLY ANONYMOUS. I
> think it is really funny that Rts can make the great and powerful
> Spammy squirm.
>
>

The only ones squirming are those poor kids your dear friend exploits..
how the FUCK can you buddy up to a sick fuck like that? I bet HE doesn't
even believe your whacked out versions of reality... you don't act this
way in real life do you? It wouldn't surprise me... also would explain
why Renee is too embarassed to put you, her husband, on the “my family”
page on her site... it’s just her cats!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

looooooooser

--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
"God told me to skin you alive"

http://prozac.iscool.net

Robert - THX1138 - Born

unread,
Sep 20, 2002, 5:47:50 PM9/20/02
to
ThePsyko <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:

>even believe your whacked out versions of reality... you don't act this
>way in real life do you? It wouldn't surprise me... also would explain

Well, why not ask all of Luke`s former girl- or boyfriends.
You won`t hear anything that would make you fear.
--
Robert Born
http://born.x0rk.com
http://born.x0rk.com/2002/misc/netsig.html
http://www.robert-born.de

Anonymous

unread,
Sep 20, 2002, 7:12:04 PM9/20/02
to
Brad has repeatedly said that he knows NOTHING about Bullis or the
accusations against him. He has NEVER in any way endorsed Bullis or
the behaviors he is accused of.

What Brad is against is anonymous vigilantes who do not deal
with the matter in an appropriate way or with appropriate authorities.
He is also against the tendency of the anonymous vigilantes to involve and
torture a whole family over the supposed bad behaviors of one member.
NO HOPING INTO BED WITH ANYONE. PLEASE TRY CLEAR THINKING.

And, actually, all this is not to the point. The point was, that "Taylor"
is not ABLE to be held to account for his behavior because he does not have
the decency to reveal his identity, all the while while holding others
accountable by name. That was the only point of Brad's (or whoever's) post.
THERE IS NO SIGN OF SUPPORT FOR BULLIS OR ANY OF THE BEHAVIORS HE IS ACCUSED
OF. It is just obvious that "Taylor" is hiding, that's all.

NO HOPING INTO BED WITH ANYONE. PLEASE TRY CLEAR THINKING.


Daniel L. Snyder

unread,
Sep 20, 2002, 7:25:12 PM9/20/02
to
In article <0e443f2f6fd8a35a...@remailer.privacy.at>,
Anonymous <nob...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:

Ironic isn't it, given that Brad just posted in mn.general, publicly
accusing me of supporting "Taylor".

You got that log-in-the-eye thing going on, Bradnee.

0 new messages