Naked Is As Naked Does (Was Seemingly Naked)
gerry armstrong
>On 27 Oct 1997 til...@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr) wrote:
>
>
>
>I asked Gerry Armstrong if he did appear "seemingly naked" in a
>newspaper, as clam publications said. He explained that this DA shows
>very well how DA works. He had founded a movement called the
>"renunciators" and had sent press releases about this to the media.
> The Marin county newspaper interviewed him and made a foto of him
>in the lotus position behind a huge globe. Because the globe was so
> big, most of his body couldn't be seen - he was wearing Gym shorts,
> he wasn't naked at all. Eugene Ingram (who, btw, once told Gerry that
>he would get a bullet between his eyes) even visited the paper and
>interviewed the journalist / fotographers, so scientology knew very well
> that Gerry wasn't naked.
>
>
>
>Tilman
In its black propaganda packs on me, Scientology continually
makes the "apparently naked" charge:
"Since the case (Armstrong I, LASC No. C 420153)
was heard, Armstrong has adopted a degraded life-style
and developed some odd financial ideas. He is the self-
proclaimed founder of the "Organization of United
Renunciants." In November 1992 the Marin Independent
Journal attempted to explain Armstrong's philosophy of
life in an article entitled "Is money the root of
problems?" The story featured a photograph of an
apparently naked Armstrong, eyes closed and smiling,
sitting in a lotus position embracing an enormous
globe."
In one of its black propaganda pack on Judge Breckenridge, the
cult writes:
" "Since the case (Armstrong I) was heard,
Armstrong has adopted a hippy life-style. He is the
self-proclaimed founder of the "Organization of United
Renunciants." A November 1992 article in the Marin
Independent Journal featured a photograph of an
apparently naked Armstrong, eyes closed and smiling,
sitting in a lotus position embracing a globe."
At other times the cult drops the "apparently" or "seemingly" and
exposes its raw villainy.
On August 5, 1993, Heber Jentzsch writes to Carol Fracassa,
producer at Entertainment Television in LA:
"[Armstrong] has no relation to art or artists and
has no history of being published anywhere - except, of
course for the photo of himself, nude, hugging the
globe of the world and promoting the idea that everyone
should give away what money they have.
The documents are attached."
The same cult black PR publication attacking Factnet which
contained the cult's grotesque characterization of the "pig
dream," (see post "For Grady with Love and Squalor') continued:
"On November 11, 1992, in the Marin Independent
Journal there was an article on Gerald Armstrong titled
"Is Money The Root of Problems." In the article there
is a picture of Armstrong (ital)in the nude holding a
globe(end ital)."
In a letter on OSA stationery dated May 9, 1994 to Charles
Collier-Wright of Mirror Group Newspapers in the UK, Mike Rinder,
stripped of any seemliness, writes:
"By involving himself with Church of Scientology
litigation, Mr. Armstrong is in violation of a legal
agreement he made in 1986. Were the Mirror to call him
as a witness, your client would become a party to that
violation. However, your client would be advised not to
rely on information from Mr. Armstrong. He has now
distinguished himself by posing naked in a newspaper
claiming that the solution to the national debt is for
everyone in the United States to simply renounce money.
He claims himself to be the "Founder of the
Organization of United Renunciants."
In the same letter Rinder also attacks Robert Vaughn Young, Garry
Scarff, Hana and Jerry Whitfield, Richard and Vicki Aznaran,
Lawrence Wollersheim, Scott Mayer and Graham Berry. Rinder copies
the letter to Gerrard Tyrell of Harbottle & Lewis, and Gerald
Feffer of Williams and Connelly.
Last month OSA scrub Lynn Farny passed the same seemingly naked
lie on to Channel 4 in the cult's effort to derail the Secret
Life of L. Ron Goodbugger.
As Tilman says, I wasn't physically naked when photographed for
the Marin IJ article, but was wearing a pair of running shorts.
The cult knew this because its iniquitous intimidator Ingram
interviewed the IJ photographer Frank Frost within a few days of
the article appearing. I protested to Rinder during a meeting in
1994 that I wasn't nude in the photo and that Scientology knew I
wasn't. He acknowledged this, and in fact acknowledged that what
Scientology was doing to me was black PR. He also said that they
were going to continue to black PR me until I was silent.
But I figure that if the unadorned truth won't curb bare-faced
liars rather than be shuddered into a straitjacket I'd just let it all
hang out.
Gerry
Garry Scarff
gerry armstrong <arms...@ntonline.com> wrote in article
<34712127....@news.dowco.com>...
>
> >On 27 Oct 1997 til...@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr) wrote:> >
> >
> >I asked Gerry Armstrong if he did appear "seemingly naked" in a
> >newspaper, as clam publications said. He explained that this DA shows
> >very well how DA works. He had founded a movement called the
> >"renunciators" and had sent press releases about this to the media.
> > The Marin county newspaper interviewed him and made a foto of him
> >in the lotus position behind a huge globe. Because the globe was so
> > big, most of his body couldn't be seen - he was wearing Gym shorts,
> > he wasn't naked at all. Eugene Ingram (who, btw, once told Gerry that
> >he would get a bullet between his eyes) even visited the paper and
> >interviewed the journalist / fotographers, so scientology knew very well
> > that Gerry wasn't naked.> >
> >
> >Tilman
Damn, I always wanted to know what Gerry looked like naked? Whether it''s
true that he has a small tatoo of a bee on the stem of his dick?
Anti-Cult
On 19 Nov 1997 03:30:23 GMT.
"Garry Scarff" <Sca...@iag.net>.
From: ARSholes Anonymous.
Wrote on the subject: Re: Naked Is As Naked Does (Was Seemingly Naked):
Get lost you heterophobe!
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Somebody some day will say 'this is illegal'. By then be sure
the orgs say what is legal or not."
-- L. Ron Hubbard, HCOPL 4 January 1966
------------------------------------------------------------------
***** Body thetans? We don't need no stinking Body Thetans! ******
********** http://www.users.wineasy.se/noname/index.htm **********
*** Public PGP key: http://www.users.wineasy.se/noname/pgp.htm ***
****** The.Galacti...@ThePentagon.com (Anti-Cult) *******
------------------------------------------------------------------
Victimized by the Co$. "Deadfiled" in at least one Org. Seen too
much, heard to much, lived too much. Security Coded hard disks
too much. Have been reading NOTS too much. Having chronic
pneumonia. As Arnold said: I'll be back......
------------------------------------------------------------------