My father liked dressing up as a SS man Nazi
Lisa McVay-Henske
torture my mother and myself. He had at least ten SS uniforms
he would wear. I think my father worships Nazis secretly.
My father is Ken McVay, director of Nizkor. He must of learned
torture techniques from all of those Nazi documents he read and
salivated over when I used to live at home.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
Ken McVay, OBC
and self-described abject failure at organizing the Hull
and North Lincolnshire unit of the British National Party,"
stated his position on the terrorist murder of about 3000 people
on September 11, 2001 in the attacks in New York, Washington
and Pennsylvania.
<quote>
Now, however, the chickens are coming home to roost. This afternoon a
truly wonderful thing has happened: the oppressed of the earth have
turned around and have shown that they do not have to be nature's
eternal victims. They have shown that the poor, the downtrodden, and the
powerless can strike back at the very heart of the dark forces that are
oppressing them. This time it was not Palestinian children who cowered
in fear as death came from the skies -- this time it was the very fat
bankers and financiers who sustain the terroristic regime of Sharon.
This time it was those very military men who mastermind the attacks on
the women and children of Iraq. They thought they were so safe as they
planned death and destruction from their comfortable offices in the
Pentagon, and as they did their dirty deals in the World Trade Center.
Now they have been given a bloody nose that they will never forget.
Today was a glorious day. May there be many others like it.
Death to American capitalism!
Death to international finance!
David Michael
Message-ID: <3b9e...@news-uk.onetel.net.uk>
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:18:49 +0100
</quote>
(2) When challenged with: "You applaud the terror and killing of
thousands of innocent people perpetrated by the terrorists who attacked
the Pentagon and attacked and destroyed the World Trade Center, calling
their actions "a wonderful thing," the day the attacks occurred a
"glorious day," and finishing by fervently wishing for "many more" such
days.", his response was:
"I do indeed."
...skipping...
Lincolnshire unit of the British National Party, I'm afraid I simply
won't have time to continue our little debates in this forum. It's a
question of directing one's efforts to the place where they will have
most effect. Good wishes to all who wish to continue the good fight
here.
</quote>
david_...@onetel.net.uk (David Michael)
24 May 2001
Message-ID: <3B0C4356...@onetel.net.uk>
<quote>
Islam is not our enemy. America is our enemy. We should be fighting
shoulder-to-shoulder with our Islamic friends under the slogan
'death to America!'
</quote>
http://www.redaction.org/wwwboard/msgs5/5940.HTM
June 13, 2002
<<<Doc Tavish>>>
OBC" <kmc...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>Now, however, the chickens are coming home to roost.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=66afnv0e8q6h7m3g7k086el6rsbp6otg5m%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: B'nai Brith Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <66afnv0e8q6h7m3g7...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:45 GMT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
<<<Doc Tavish>>>
>My father would often dress up like an SS man when he would
>torture my mother and myself. He had at least ten SS uniforms
>he would wear. I think my father worships Nazis secretly.
>
>My father is Ken McVay, director of Nizkor. He must of learned
>torture techniques from all of those Nazi documents he read and
>salivated over when I used to live at home.
>
Your father is, indeed, one sick and twisted individual.
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p0afnvchj52pcuh6c0dk78f9bs7ngfetac%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <p0afnvchj52pcuh6c...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:54 GMT
nameless
"Ken McVay, OBC" <kmc...@nizkor.org> wrote in message
news:blc4l...@enews1.newsguy.com...
Patrick Keenan
message news:5acjnvso139o6dtnl...@4ax.com...
> On 30 Sep 2003 13:29:45 +0200, Lisa McVay-Henske <unli...@unknown.net>
wrote:
>
> >My father would often dress up like an SS man when he would
> >torture my mother and myself. He had at least ten SS uniforms
> >he would wear. I think my father worships Nazis secretly.
> >
> >My father is Ken McVay, director of Nizkor. He must of learned
> >torture techniques from all of those Nazi documents he read and
> >salivated over when I used to live at home.
> >
>
> Your father is, indeed, one sick and twisted individual.
>
> Tavish
Which one might say if one were stupid enough to fall for obvious
forgeries - as you apparently are.
-pk
Gord McFee
Patrick Keenan <te...@dev.null> wrote:
He didn't fall for it. He either wrote it or knows who did.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
>
> -pk
Patrick Keenan
news:zPqeb.16966$lKj....@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> In news:myneb.2675$Tu2.4...@news20.bellglobal.com,
> Patrick Keenan <te...@dev.null> wrote:
>
> > "<<<Doc Tavish>>>" <Doc_T...@AMERICAN-TAVISH01-CENTRAL.NET> wrote in
> > message news:5acjnvso139o6dtnl...@4ax.com...
> >> On 30 Sep 2003 13:29:45 +0200, Lisa McVay-Henske
> >> <unli...@unknown.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> My father would often dress up like an SS man when he would
> >>> torture my mother and myself. He had at least ten SS uniforms
> >>> he would wear. I think my father worships Nazis secretly.
> >>>
> >>> My father is Ken McVay, director of Nizkor. He must of learned
> >>> torture techniques from all of those Nazi documents he read and
> >>> salivated over when I used to live at home.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Your father is, indeed, one sick and twisted individual.
> >>
> >> Tavish
> >
> > Which one might say if one were stupid enough to fall for obvious
> > forgeries - as you apparently are.
>
> He didn't fall for it. He either wrote it or knows who did.
That would not surprise me in the least. But, Bradbury is required to make
a show of swallowing it whole, though it clearly is of worthless provenance.
It's so convenient for him that they have arrive just at the time when he
has a spew in progress.
I notice that Mr. Bradbury tends to not denounce these bogus posts. I
wonder why not.
-pk
Sara Salzman
"Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null> wrote:
Because he's too busy quoting them.
Sara
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Patrick Keenan
news:catamont-EB34CB...@news-60.giganews.com...
But that would mean that he accepts that lies can and should be used as
information sources.
When he has you "charged" with "Perjury", how will he be able to prove
anything, given that he is showing himself willing to swallow obvious lies,
and will repost them with no honest attempt at verification? Why, his
whole "case" will be called into question the moment he files his "briefs".
I would wonder what legal firm would accept such a "case". Particularly
since no authorities appear to give any weight whatsoever to his claims.
(But hey, they're all controlled by the Jews or Comminists, so what do you
expect?)
That's the whole problem with believing or using anything that has passed
through an anonymizing system. As there is no way of proving provenance,
its output must be regarded as utterly worthless.
-pk
Sara Salzman
"Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null> wrote:
Constantly.
> When he has you "charged" with "Perjury", how will he be able to prove
> anything, given that he is showing himself willing to swallow obvious lies,
> and will repost them with no honest attempt at verification? Why, his
> whole "case" will be called into question the moment he files his "briefs".
Well, there's a few ... umm ... assumptions in the above that should be
pointed out.
1. There have been no "charges" leveled against me. Mr. Bradbury has
always seemed to believe that by shouting something in Usenet, it's the
same as "charging" someone. He also seems to equate things said in
Usenet with facts sworn to in Court. Of course, there is absolutely no
relation between "something said" in a public place and testimony sworn
to before an attorney or in a court of law.
2. There was no "perjury," of course. My affidavit was never challenged
by Mr. Bradbury's attorney. And of course, no matter how many times it
has been pointed out to him, Mr. Bradbury believes that the phrase
"Defendant Bradbury and/or his accomplices" means "Scott Bradbury and no
one else." No matter how many times it has been pointed out to him that
the phrases "anti-Semitic activists," and "accomplices" refer to many
different people, Mr. Bradbury stated that it only referred to him.
That's the basis of his "perjury" claim. Needless to say, the District
Attorney of his county laughed out loud when I showed him Mr. Bradbury's
posts claiming such.
3. And of course, there is no "case." For all of his posturing, blowhard
noises, raving and spewing, Mr. Bradbury has not filed a case. In fact,
when I visited his District Attorney, I was informed that Mr. Bradbury
had not even SPOKEN to the DA in more than three years. You will
remember that recently Mr. Bradbury claimed I had "done exactly as he
wanted" by going to his town, since it "put me in his jurisdiction" so
that he could file his specious case. And of course, he has done
absolutely nothing. This is why I refer to him as "the Most Impotent Man
on Usenet."
>
> I would wonder what legal firm would accept such a "case". Particularly
> since no authorities appear to give any weight whatsoever to his claims.
> (But hey, they're all controlled by the Jews or Comminists, so what do you
> expect?)
I believe District Attorney Koehn would be rather surprised to hear that
he is controlled by Jews or Communists. So would the Sheriff of Mr.
Bradbury's county. The local police told me that they have a "name" for
Mr. Bradbury, but they would not say it in front of women or children.
>
> That's the whole problem with believing or using anything that has passed
> through an anonymizing system. As there is no way of proving provenance,
> its output must be regarded as utterly worthless.
>
> -pk
>
>
But that's how these guys work. It's the Big Lie all over again, isn't
it? Don Ellis or Pat Blakely post something like "Sara is a Drug
Abuser," and Mr. bradbury gratefully picks it up and claims he has
"proof" that I'm a drug abuser. Now for all their drooling over my home
address, including maps and photos, and all their "research," and their
faked news stories (I especially liked the one where my ex-husband was
supposed to be "picking up the kids" or "dropping the kids off" -- I
can't remember which it was, when their father lives 2000 miles away and
has only visited his children once in three years), they have never been
able to produce a scintilla of evidence about any of their accusations.
But, hey! Facts have never been Mr Bradbury's forte.
Ken McVay, OBC
"Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null> wrote in message
news:TAseb.2865$Tu2.5...@news20.bellglobal.com...
[...]
> its output must be regarded as utterly worthless.
How fitting, then, that we associate it with Mr. Bradbury, who also appears
to be absolutely worthless.
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/bradbury-scott
<<<Doc Tavish>>>
<catamont-AA748F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>2. There was no "perjury," of course. My affidavit was never challenged
>by Mr. Bradbury's attorney. And of course, no matter how many times it
>has been pointed out to him,
And how many times does it have to be pointed out that neither my attorney NOR
myself were ever furnsihed with all of those lunatic fabrications?
I.E.
16 Sep 2003 15:59:15 GMT,<catamont-564BD5...@netnews.attbi.com>
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>Nope. My afidavit was accepted as fact because THE JUDGE SAID SO.
Your perjurious affidavit was accepted as FACT because neither my attorney nor I
were ever furnished the complaints and the opportunity to challenge your lies
and the whole lawsuit! THAT IS FACT!!
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant. The court has
heard telephone messages left on the defendant's answering machine, in which
the plaintiff admits dedicating himself to making the defendant's life a "living
hell." He refers to the defendant as a "miserable piece of shit" among other
charming epithets. The defendant's private medical information, subpoenaed by
Mr. Edeiken finds its way onto the Internet. Even after the defendant is
represented by counsel, mail is still sent directly to the defendant addressed
to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of
the complaint when he first becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You"
via e-mail. In plain English, this is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged
by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never met. The court should not be a party to
this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself against numerous perjured
false accusations as detailed in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>
Andrea E. Naugle
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Care to deny the above is true!? That is why I won the lawsuit you lying pig!
Tavish
<<<Doc Tavish>>>
OBC" <kmc...@nizkor.org> wrote:
^^^^^^
>How fitting, then, that we associate it with Mr. Bradbury, who also appears
>to be absolutely worthless.
>
>http://www.nizkor.org/hweb
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p0afnvchj52pcuh6c0dk78f9bs7ngfetac%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <p0afnvchj52pcuh6c...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:54 GMT
----NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay's Numerous Lies Regarding His Funding----
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=07qc8vguuom77pvmugliksb3dmdf8pp82r%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
Message-ID: <07qc8vguuom77pvmu...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:22 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=453fevk7jgu8ctdt45a4coabbfgo9k5dns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Article on Ken McVay _mc...@internet.fighter_ (Also Helps Prove He's a
Liar) R_0611
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:20:32 -0500
Message-ID: <453fevk7jgu8ctdt4...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=67qc8v8192tumoaivq4joitsquts3t5bs8%404ax.com&rnum=7
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Caught Lying About San Antonio
Connection! (Those Two U.S. Servers!) V2.0
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:12 GMT
Message-ID: <67qc8v8192tumoaiv...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhao2v4fbuij94mcmi6sicj73sa4eifsns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor
Endowment and Trust Funds?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:56:49 -0600
Message-ID: <rhao2v4fbuij94mcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e060868_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p6qc8v4546g3bl9ds3kns5pk297kpgn2k2%404ax.com&rnum=3
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG and B'nai Brith's Apparent Funding Kick Backs and Tax Scam
Message-ID: <p6qc8v4546g3bl9ds...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:27 GMT
B'nai Brith also funded communist David Lethbridge:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=66afnv0e8q6h7m3g7k086el6rsbp6otg5m%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: B'nai Brith Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <66afnv0e8q6h7m3g7...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:45 GMT
Sara Salzman
"<<<Doc Tavish>>>" <Doc_T...@AMERICAN-TAVISH01-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:18:35 -0600,
> <catamont-AA748F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >2. There was no "perjury," of course. My affidavit was never challenged
> >by Mr. Bradbury's attorney. And of course, no matter how many times it
> >has been pointed out to him,
>
> And how many times does it have to be pointed out that neither my attorney
> NOR
> myself were ever furnsihed with all of those lunatic fabrications?
Point it out all your want. My affidavit was submitted IN OPEN COURT by
Mr. Edeiken. YOUR ATTORNEY WAS IN THE ROOM.
Therefore, the rest of your drivel is pure lies.
Again.
Sara
followups set AGAIN
Ken McVay, OBC
to be absolutely worthless.
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/bradbury-scott
Patrick Keenan
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:18:35 -0600,
> <catamont-AA748F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >2. There was no "perjury," of course. My affidavit was never challenged
> >by Mr. Bradbury's attorney. And of course, no matter how many times it
> >has been pointed out to him,
>
> And how many times does it have to be pointed out that neither my attorney
NOR
> myself were ever furnsihed with all of those lunatic fabrications?
The court didn't think they were "lunatic", did they?
If you weren't furnished with them, did you just "happen" to have an
attorney in that particular courtroom that particular day they were
presented? Why didn't he challenge them?
If you have a case, sue. Otherwise you're just whining.
-pk
Joe Bruno
> In article <qksknvcj5rtfcvmml...@4ax.com>,
> "<<<Doc Tavish>>>" <Doc_T...@AMERICAN-TAVISH01-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:18:35 -0600,
> > <catamont-AA748F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> > <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >
> > >2. There was no "perjury," of course. My affidavit was never challenged
> > >by Mr. Bradbury's attorney. And of course, no matter how many times it
> > >has been pointed out to him,
> >
> > And how many times does it have to be pointed out that neither my attorney
> > NOR
> > myself were ever furnsihed with all of those lunatic fabrications?
>
>
> Point it out all your want. My affidavit was submitted IN OPEN COURT by
> Mr. Edeiken. YOUR ATTORNEY WAS IN THE ROOM.
>
> Therefore, the rest of your drivel is pure lies.
> Again.
>
> Sara
>
>
> followups set AGAIN
Fatboy says he was never served. I wonder how he knew enough to hire
Leach if he did not know about the lawsuit against him? Lawyers are
expensive. I never retain one unless I absolutely need one.
<<<Doc Tavish>>>
<catamont-C0D473...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <qksknvcj5rtfcvmml...@4ax.com>,
> "<<<Doc Tavish>>>" <Doc_T...@AMERICAN-TAVISH01-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:18:35 -0600,
>> <catamont-AA748F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >2. There was no "perjury," of course. My affidavit was never challenged
>> >by Mr. Bradbury's attorney. And of course, no matter how many times it
>> >has been pointed out to him,
>>
>> And how many times does it have to be pointed out that neither my attorney
>> NOR myself were ever furnsihed with all of those lunatic fabrications?
>
>
>Point it out all your want. My affidavit was submitted IN OPEN COURT by
>Mr. Edeiken. YOUR ATTORNEY WAS IN THE ROOM.
And that is why he sumbmitted what follows! How could my attorney respond to
complaintt which were never served?
>Therefore, the rest of your drivel is pure lies.
So a court record stating the reason for relief from judgment (which was
granted) is a lie? My but you are in denial!
>Again.
>
>Sara
Care to deny the above is true!? That is why I won the lawsuit!
<<<Doc Tavish>>>
OBC" <kmc...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>How fitting, then, that we associate it with Mr. Bradbury, who also appears
>to be absolutely worthless.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e0608d2_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG and B'nai Brith's Apparent Funding Kick Backs and Tax Scam
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:48:04 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p0afnvchj52pcuh6c0dk78f9bs7ngfetac%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <p0afnvchj52pcuh6c...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:54 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=66afnv0e8q6h7m3g7k086el6rsbp6otg5m%404ax.com&rnum=1
Patrick Humphrey
>http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/bradbury-scott
Why so charitable? ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
Sara Salzman
"<<<Doc Tavish>>>" <Doc_T...@AMERICAN-TAVISH01-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 07:23:04 -0600,
> <catamont-C0D473...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <qksknvcj5rtfcvmml...@4ax.com>,
> > "<<<Doc Tavish>>>" <Doc_T...@AMERICAN-TAVISH01-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:18:35 -0600,
> >> <catamont-AA748F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> >> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >2. There was no "perjury," of course. My affidavit was never challenged
> >> >by Mr. Bradbury's attorney. And of course, no matter how many times it
> >> >has been pointed out to him,
> >>
> >> And how many times does it have to be pointed out that neither my attorney
> >> NOR myself were ever furnsihed with all of those lunatic fabrications?
> >
> >
> >Point it out all your want. My affidavit was submitted IN OPEN COURT by
> >Mr. Edeiken. YOUR ATTORNEY WAS IN THE ROOM.
>
> And that is why he sumbmitted what follows! How could my attorney respond to
> complaintt which were never served?
Please check your dictionary, LOSER. An affidavit is NOT a complaint. I
have nothing whatsoever to do with the COMPLAINT.
MY AFFIDAVIT WAS PRESENTED IN OPEN COURT. YOUR ATTORNEY WAS THERE.
Since you obviously don't know the difference between an affidavit and a
complaint, it's no wonder you don't have the slightest knowledge about
human relations or anything else.
>
> >Therefore, the rest of your drivel is pure lies.
>
> So a court record stating the reason for relief from judgment (which was
> granted) is a lie? My but you are in denial!
>
> >Again.
> >
> >Sara
Your petition for relief has to do with the COMPLAINT, MORON, not the
affidavit.
My GOD, you're stupid.
Sara
Followups set AGAIN
--
Sara Salzman
joeb...@indystart.com (Joe Bruno) wrote:
That doesn't concern me, since I had nothing to do with the compaint,
the service of the complaint, or anything else.
All I did was offer a statement in the form of an affidavit which was
PRESENTED IN OPEN COURT in front of Bradbury's attorney.
The fact that he thinks an affidavit and a complaint are the same thing
just illustrates which a complete and total ass he is.
<<<Doc Tavish>>>
<catamont-4F93DE...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>Please check your dictionary, LOSER. An affidavit is NOT a complaint. I
>have nothing whatsoever to do with the COMPLAINT.
None of which neither my attorney nor myself ever saw is the whole point you
lying dirty pig!
Now go fist yourself you repulsive slob.
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
:
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=07qc8vguuom77pvmugliksb3dmdf8pp82r%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
Message-ID: <07qc8vguuom77pvmu...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:22 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ht5ucvcf5slhll9gmfpojbsche5090ldm6%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: David Michael Came Very Close to Getting The "TREATMENT" Shyster Yale
F. Edeiken Gave Me! aka Re: Bradbury Misses The Point (Again)
Message-ID: <ht5ucvcf5slhll9gm...@4ax.com>
Date: 24 May 2003 07:09:57 GMT
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloP...@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Sara Salzman
"<<<Doc Tavish>>>" <Doc_T...@AMERICAN-TAVISH01-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:37:45 -0600,
> <catamont-4F93DE...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >Please check your dictionary, LOSER. An affidavit is NOT a complaint. I
> >have nothing whatsoever to do with the COMPLAINT.
>
> None of which neither my attorney nor myself ever saw is the whole point you
> lying dirty pig!
>
> Filed September 22, 2000
> PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
> COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin
> B.
> Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
> pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant
> avers
> the following:
> On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment
> with
> this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
> A."
> Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable
Since a complaint...
A COMPLAINT.
A COMPLAINT.
You STILL don't get it, do you? I didn't file a COMPLAINT, MORON. I
filed an affidavit IN SUPPORT of the complaint.
YOUR ATTORNEY WAS THERE IN THE ROOM.
It's difficult imaging ANYONE could be as stupid as you are, Mr.
Bradbury.
Sara
steve wolk
"Ken McVay, OBC" <kmc...@nizkor.org> wrote in message
news:blenj...@enews4.newsguy.com...
> How fitting, then, that we associate it with Mr. Bradbury, who also
appears
> to be absolutely worthless.
Not so. I find Fatbury worth a laugh every now and then.
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/bradbury-scott
>
>
Joe Bruno
I was merely pointing out another of his lies.
>
>
Joe Bruno
I have never before met anyone who has the gall to tell all of the
Christian ministers that he can interpret the Bible better than they
can. This clown is so stupid that he has absolutely no understanding
of the concept of credibility.He proves that also by retelling the
same lies over and over.
Joe Bruno
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:16:04 -0700, <blenj...@enews4.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
> OBC" <kmc...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>
> >How fitting, then, that we associate it with Mr. Bradbury, who also appears
> >to be absolutely worthless.
>
>
<deleted Fatboy's repetitive spam, which proves NOTHING>