the point
kcmck...@hotmail.com
money the people who have been raving here for years don't have, and
SHOULD HAVE.
it's not about me. it's about THEM.
they've used the net day after day, month after month, and year after
year... spewed and spewed and spewed. attacking everyone and everything
that invaded their territory. instead of investing or building. they
just attacked. some did build web pages... but guess what, they used
them to attack some more. because that is all they know how to do.
if they put you money where their very large mouths were, they'd all be
rich. but, not one of them did. not one of them has anything to show
for their internet experience, other than extremely embarrassing
wpg.general posting counts.
they are losers on the biggest scale whose grandchildren will condemn
them for blowing the biggest opportunity in history. they simply have
no excuse and attack the messenger instead of calling their brokers.
in the end. they will only do as they have always done.
and i will always be here showing them what they could have had (call
it a hobby... never before in history has it been so easy for those who
have done well rub it in the faces of those who need it rubbed in their
faces the most)
the gap gets wider every second.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Opus-
thusly:
>they've used the net day after day, month after month, and year after
>year... spewed and spewed and spewed. attacking everyone and everything
>that invaded their territory. instead of investing or building. they
>just attacked. some did build web pages... but guess what, they used
>them to attack some more. because that is all they know how to do.
Well, when presented with such an obvious target...
>if they put you money where their very large mouths were, they'd all be
>rich. but, not one of them did. not one of them has anything to show
>for their internet experience, other than extremely embarrassing
>wpg.general posting counts.
"Getting rich" isn't the "be all" and "end all" of everything,
especially when it involves ripping people off.
You are a sad, sad little man...the type who are seen driving black
1978 Trans-Ams with coiffed chest hair [assuming you have some] shown
off by the 5 undone buttons, laden with gold jewelry [and a bad
toupee] and Rolling Stones blasting on the stereo.
The only difference MAY be the make, model and year of car.
>they are losers on the biggest scale whose grandchildren will condemn
>them for blowing the biggest opportunity in history. they simply have
>no excuse and attack the messenger instead of calling their brokers.
I don't consider refusing to rip people off "blowing an opportunity".
>in the end. they will only do as they have always done.
>
>and i will always be here showing them what they could have had (call
>it a hobby... never before in history has it been so easy for those who
>have done well rub it in the faces of those who need it rubbed in their
>faces the most)
>
>the gap gets wider every second.
Rubbing wealth into peoples faces is often a good way to face a firing
squad. History has proven that time and time again.
Louis XVI learned that on January 21'st, 1793.
Tsar Nicholas Romanov II learned that on July 16'th, 1918
You shall reap what you sow..assuming that you aren't completely full
of shit.
--
jbu...@hotmail.com
(Jim, single dad to Lesleigh [Autistic] 04/20/94)
"What, Me Worry?" A. E. Newman
Glen Hallick
> the point, people is not how much money i have. the point is how much
> money the people who have been raving here for years don't have, and
> SHOULD HAVE.
So then using your logic the point, people is not much of a life McGimp
doesn't have. The point is how much of a life the rest of us have.
>
>
> it's not about me. it's about THEM.
Wrongo!
It is about you. Pining for the verbal abuse that you miss from this
newsgroup.
I wonder how you managed to get a computer and internet hookup in cell at
that Chilean prison. Surely by now you have found a gun shop and have had
an armed stand-off with the Chilean authorities coming after the Spanish
version of Crap6 crashed and burned.
>
>
> they've used the net day after day, month after month, and year after
> year... spewed and spewed and spewed. attacking everyone and everything
> that invaded their territory. instead of investing or building. they
> just attacked. some did build web pages... but guess what, they used
> them to attack some more. because that is all they know how to do.
Yet your post smacks of the very thing you claim to railing against. Such
only proves to people that despite this wealth you claim to have, that you
are really missing things that money can never buy...a personality...a
life...a criminal free past.
Glen
Scott Balneaves
>the point, people is not how much money i have. the point is how much
>money the people who have been raving here for years don't have, and
>SHOULD HAVE.
Got himself another account. Free one, I see. Hmmm, I wonder...
>it's not about me. it's about THEM.
Honestly. Really. It's not about me. Even though I'm supposedly
fabulously wealthy, and pressing the 'B'each button on the elevator
*RIGHT NOW*, dammit, and should have no FURTHER USE for any of the
people who I supposedly dislike SOOOOO MUCH, I just have to come back
here and post about how rich I am so that I can point out that it's
not about ME. Dammit. Why won't you listen? Hey, where's everyone
going. COME BACK OR I'LL SHOOT MYSELF!!! IT'S NOT ABOUT
MEEEEEEE!!!!!!
<snip>
>if they put you money where their very large mouths were, they'd all be
>rich. but, not one of them did. not one of them has anything to show
>for their internet experience, other than extremely embarrassing
>wpg.general posting counts.
Well, at least high posting counts are less embarassing than CR6 was.
>they are losers on the biggest scale whose grandchildren will condemn
>them for blowing the biggest opportunity in history.
Least my grandchildren won't have any gun store incedents to look back
on.
>in the end. they will only do as they have always done.
>
>and i will always be here showing them what they could have had
But it's not about me, remember.
> (call
>it a hobby... never before in history has it been so easy for those who
>have done well rub it in the faces of those who need it rubbed in their
>faces the most)
But, really, it's not about me me me me me Myself, me mememememe me
and I.
Really.
Scott
--------------------------------. "Always two, there are. No more, no less.
_|_ _ | _ _ _ sbalneav@ | The master, and the apprentice..."
_\|_)(_||| |(/_(_|\/ home.com | -- Yoda
--------------------------------'
Karen Marie Cvitkovitch
kcmck...@hotmail.com wrote:
> it's not about me. it's about THEM.
Of course it's about you. It's always been about you. Your a spoiled,
selfish person.
> they are losers on the biggest scale whose grandchildren will condemn
> them for blowing the biggest opportunity in history.
This is an example of your shallowness. You think that the only way your
grandchildren will love you is if you leave them money; that you will
never have any redeeming qualities for them to love except your wealth.
> they will only do as they have always done.
Respect and love things other than money.
>
> and i will always be here showing them what they could have had
With your thumbs stuck in your ears and your tongue sticking out and a
hearty "nyah, nyah" coming from your childish mouth.
>
> the gap gets wider every second.
Between classes and between morals.
Karen:)
Strip-Miner
1. Old money
2. New money
3. No money
Of the 3, "New Money" is the most ostentatious and most repellent. I
have friends with no money and friends with old money - they are
synonymous.!
--
EARTH FIRST! - We'll strip-mine the other planets later.
Chris and Jessie McKinstry
Strip-Miner wrote in message <84hies$rqf$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>1. Old money
>2. New money
>3. No money
nobody in canada has no money. though some live from paycheque to paycheque
or assistance cheque to assistance cheque.
i've got some new money, because i'm basically new, and my family has plenty
of old money.
Glen Hallick
Glen
Strip-Miner
"Chris and Jessie McKinstry" <mcki...@entelchile.net> wrote:
>
> Strip-Miner wrote in message <84hies$rqf$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>
> >1. Old money
> >2. New money
> >3. No money
>
> nobody in canada has no money. though some live from paycheque to
paycheque
> or assistance cheque to assistance cheque.
>
> i've got some new money, because i'm basically new, and my family has
plenty
> of old money.
>
>
>
Sorry folks, I wish you were right.! There are lots of starving people
out there - and 1 is too many.
mani...@home.com
wrote:
>Sorry folks, I wish you were right.! There are lots of starving people
>out there - and 1 is too many.
If you give a hungry person a fish, he will be hungry tomorrow. If you
teach a hungry person how to fish they can feed themselves...
People have been trying to teach you how to think...unfortunately you
return each day as empty headed as the day before...
Jim
> On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:02:37 GMT, Strip-Miner <dot...@my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Sorry folks, I wish you were right.! There are lots of starving people
> >out there - and 1 is too many.
At the risk of sounding macabre... Through my employment, I am privy to
autopsy reports. In 25 years, I have never seen an incident where a sane and
rational Manitoban has starved to death. (i.e. death by malnutrition).
I won't dispute that there have been cases of developmental deficiencies in
children due to malnourishment. I can provide no data on this. But... Based on
the data I am provided, I can safely conclude that nobody starves in Manitoba.
The leading inhibitor in child development appears to be fetal alcohol
syndrome.
Jim.
Scott Balneaves
<mcki...@entelchile.net> wrote:
>
>Strip-Miner wrote in message <84hies$rqf$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>
>>1. Old money
>>2. New money
>>3. No money
>
>
>nobody in canada has no money.
Tell that to the homeless person I give some spare change to. He'll
be happy to know that, according to you, he's just living from
paycheque to paycheque.
>i've got some new money, because i'm basically new, and my family has plenty
>of old money.
Me me me me me me me it's not about me me me memememememememe
I have new money, my parents have old money, my unborn children have
money so new it hasn't been minted yet, but the rest of you slobs
could be rich rich rich like mememememememe and pressing 'B'each in
the elevator if you'd only had been as wonderful and as intelligent as
I am, but remember: this isn't about mememememememe
And how do we know these people are related to you?
mani...@home.com
>At the risk of sounding macabre... Through my employment, I am privy to
>autopsy reports. In 25 years, I have never seen an incident where a sane and
>rational Manitoban has starved to death. (i.e. death by malnutrition).
>
>I won't dispute that there have been cases of developmental deficiencies in
>children due to malnourishment. I can provide no data on this. But... Based on
>the data I am provided, I can safely conclude that nobody starves in Manitoba.
>
>The leading inhibitor in child development appears to be fetal alcohol
>syndrome.
Markenstien would attribute any death to whatever political cause
suited his fancy at the moment, so I would put too much faith in any
vital statistics compiled by that office...
Jim Townsend
<mani...@home.com> wrote
> Markenstien would attribute any death to whatever political cause
> suited his fancy at the moment, so I would put too much faith in any
> vital statistics compiled by that office...
You aren't suggesting the Chief ME is covering up deaths by starvation for some
political reason are you ?? I doubt anyone has such tight control over their
staff. He doesn't personally do every PM.
While it's certain there are children out there right now who are hungry
because they've missed meals, there are no cases of them dying for lack of
food. The term 'starving' connotes a condition leading to death.
In cases where parents have allowed their children to starve, there are always
investigations. This stuff almost always makes the media due to its human
interest and rarity.
My point is that while there may be hungry children out there, none are
starving.. (Speaking of Manitoba or Canada in general).
mani...@home.com
wrote:
>You aren't suggesting the Chief ME is covering up deaths by starvation for some
>political reason are you ?? I doubt anyone has such tight control over their
>staff. He doesn't personally do every PM.
>
>While it's certain there are children out there right now who are hungry
>because they've missed meals, there are no cases of them dying for lack of
>food. The term 'starving' connotes a condition leading to death.
>
>In cases where parents have allowed their children to starve, there are always
>investigations. This stuff almost always makes the media due to its human
>interest and rarity.
>
>My point is that while there may be hungry children out there, none are
>starving.. (Speaking of Manitoba or Canada in general).
What I'm suggesting is that it's hair splitting. It really doesn't
matter if the cause of death of a person is stated as pneumonia
when they in fact have AIDS, any more than stating a child died of
renal failure because they were mal-nourished.
The cause of death is stated with some degree of specificity for a
reason and the term AID's related, or mal-nourished isn't found on the
form.
Chris and Jessie McKinstry
Scott Balneaves wrote in message <386d52c8.19447517@news>...
>>http://www.mckinstry.com
>
>And how do we know these people are related to you?
genetically.
Scott Balneaves
Ahhh, well that's real difinitive proof for a newsgroup format.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Munzoor Wahid
<kcmck...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:84bfrp$m50$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> the point, people is not how much money i have. the point is how much
> money the people who have been raving here for years don't have, and
> SHOULD HAVE.
>
> it's not about me. it's about THEM.
>
> they've used the net day after day, month after month, and year after
> year... spewed and spewed and spewed. attacking everyone and everything
> that invaded their territory. instead of investing or building. they
> just attacked. some did build web pages... but guess what, they used
> them to attack some more. because that is all they know how to do.
>
> if they put you money where their very large mouths were, they'd all be
> rich. but, not one of them did. not one of them has anything to show
> for their internet experience, other than extremely embarrassing
> wpg.general posting counts.
>
> they are losers on the biggest scale whose grandchildren will condemn
> them for blowing the biggest opportunity in history. they simply have
> no excuse and attack the messenger instead of calling their brokers.
>
> in the end. they will only do as they have always done.
>
> and i will always be here showing them what they could have had (call
> it a hobby... never before in history has it been so easy for those who
> have done well rub it in the faces of those who need it rubbed in their
> faces the most)
>
> the gap gets wider every second.
>
>
Opus-
>x-no-archive: yes On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 14:00:30 -0500, "Chris and
>Jessie McKinstry" <mcki...@entelchile.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>Scott Balneaves wrote in message <386d52c8.19447517@news>...
>>
>>>>http://www.mckinstry.com
>>>
>>>And how do we know these people are related to you?
>>
>>
>>genetically.
>>
>
>I'd bet they don't openly admit to it
I'd be changing my last name.
Strip-Miner
mani...@home.com wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:02:37 GMT, Strip-Miner <dot...@my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Sorry folks, I wish you were right.! There are lots of starving
people
> >out there - and 1 is too many.
>
> teach a hungry person how to fish they can feed themselves...
>
> People have been trying to teach you how to think...unfortunately you
> return each day as empty headed as the day before...
>
>
--
EARTH FIRST! - We'll strip-mine the other planets later.
mani...@home.com
wrote:
>Follow ME.! and I will make you a fisher of men.
Um, er, in case you didn't notice, yer trolling with an empty hook...
Strip-Miner
>
> >1. Old money
> >2. New money
> >3. No money
>
paycheque
> or assistance cheque to assistance cheque.
>
>
>
You started down the wrong tangent.! For clarification:
If you can't scrape up $1,000. to do Vegas for 3 days - you have NO
money.!
If you just won the lottery and now you are BETTER than the people you
have worked with all your life - thats NEW money.!
If that new Cadillac siting in the driveway is really your "winter
beater" and only your inner circle of friends know what's in the garage
- that's OLD money.!