Doc Tavish Is A Jew
ABS
Do you have one brain cell left in your little mentally challenged head?
Red wrote in message <99191@!>...
>Doc Tavish may be a Jew because he promotes Christianity.
>
>Christianity is Jewish.
>
>--
>"All will be joy-smiths and their task shall be to beat out
>laughter from the ringing anvil of life."
> -- Jack London
>finger red....@rahul.net for public kitty.
Doc Tavish
On 23 Jan 1998 01:25:43 GMT, r...@rahul.net (Red) wrote:
>Doc Tavish may be a Jew because he promotes Christianity.
>
>Christianity is Jewish.
I know at least three people that would never ever believe that;
Jeffrey G. Brown, Allan Matthews, and Gregory Taylor!
Signed,
Munching on a stale bagel, washing it down with Mogen David
Doc Tavishstein :-)
BTW I am not what you would call a "practicing Christian" and you have
helped me when you've said that Jews created Christianity. The first
Christians were Jews BUT is it not a hoot to watch the Pharisees go
berserk when the Bible writings are held up to their faces! I make it
my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote and when they go
squaking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews! That is my
method!
Take care- your hear! :-)
Whitey
r...@rahul.net (Red) went apeshit and wrote:
>Doc Tavish may be a Jew because he promotes Christianity.
>Christianity is Jewish.
Now I KNOW you're tripping!
Byte me.
GARRYOWEN!
Whitey
"ABS" <eng...@mindspring.com> went apeshit and wrote:
>Do you have one brain cell left in your little mentally challenged head?
He certainly does - but just the ONE.
>Red wrote in message <99191@!>...
>>Doc Tavish may be a Jew because he promotes Christianity.
>>
>>Christianity is Jewish.
>>
>>--
>>"All will be joy-smiths and their task shall be to beat out
>>laughter from the ringing anvil of life."
>> -- Jack London
>>finger red....@rahul.net for public kitty.
Byte me.
GARRYOWEN!
John Winslow Brown
Red <r...@rahul.net> wrote in article <99229@!>...
> jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger) wrote:
>
> > We don't want him!
>
> You accept rape-murderers like Joel Rifkin, and you don't want peaceful
> intellectuals like Doc Tavish?
Remember Joseph is a descendent of those that cried to have Barrabas
relaesd, who was also a murderer!
Joseph Hertzlinger
In <99242@!> r...@rahul.net (Red) writes:
>Christians, Jews and Islamists are ALL superstitious assholes, but
>Jews are by far the stupidest, and have contributed the least to the
>world by their fudge-packin superstitious cults.
Marx, Freud, and Trotsky were not representative of Judaism.
Joseph Hertzlinger
In <34c81280...@news.tavish.net> doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com
(Doc Tavish) writes:
>BTW I am not what you would call a "practicing Christian" and you have
>helped me when you've said that Jews created Christianity. The first
>Christians were Jews BUT is it not a hoot to watch the Pharisees go
>berserk when the Bible writings are held up to their faces! I make it
>my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote and when they go
>squaking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews! That is my
>method!
It is very difficult to complain to a Jewish Bolshevik. It's like
complaining to a black-footed ferret.
A Jewish Bolshevik has been sighted in a discussion of Stalin on
soc.culture.jewish and I have complained.
mad...@uscom.com
No DOC TAVISH IS A WANTED FELON, WANTED BY THE FBI FOR DEATH THREATS
SENT TO JEWS. RLA IS HIS BEST FRIEND SO I HEAR.
madayn
Doc Tavish
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 16:44:45 GMT, mad...@uscom.com wrote:
>No DOC TAVISH IS A WANTED FELON, WANTED BY THE FBI FOR DEATH THREATS
>SENT TO JEWS.
Hey Yid, if and when you finally get hold of the FBI please ask them
what the hold up is on them sending me my updated decoder ring. BTW
have you received your Jethro Bodine double naught spy kit yet?
` Doc Tavish
William Wallace
>On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 16:44:45 GMT, mad...@uscom.com wrote:
>>No DOC TAVISH IS A WANTED FELON, WANTED BY THE FBI FOR DEATH THREATS
>>SENT TO JEWS.
>Hey Yid, if and when you finally get hold of the FBI please ask them
>what the hold up is on them sending me my updated decoder ring. BTW
>have you received your Jethro Bodine double naught spy kit yet?
> ` Doc Tavish
I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured by the
ADL.
=====
Let every Muslim learn one word and learn it well.
Let it be their constant shout to every Israeli.
If need be, let it be the last word in every Israeli ear.
FREEDOM!
Jud
SO YOU MOTHERFUCKER HERR MADYAN PIECE OF SHIT, WHY DO YOU KEEP CHANGING
YOUR ISP, I KNOW YOU HAVE BEEN KICKED AROUND BY ALL MEANS.
GOD BLESS ROGER AND GOLANI (REST IN PEACE) YOUR ASS KICKERS.
mad...@uscom.com wrote:
> No DOC TAVISH IS A WANTED FELON, WANTED BY THE FBI FOR DEATH THREATS
> SENT TO JEWS. RLA IS HIS BEST FRIEND SO I HEAR.
>
> madayn
george
Go fuck a goat you sicko
Dr. Phlegming
Red removed his cranial cavity from the upper recess of his anus and decided
to clear his head thusly:<99242@!>...
>
>The Bible, Koran and Talmud is a big load of superstitious crap that
>isn't close to being factual; it doesn't even make good fiction.
>
>Christians, Jews and Islamists are ALL superstitious assholes, but Jews
>are by far the stupidest, and have contributed the least to the world
>by their fudge-packin superstitious cults.
>
>--
>"All will be joy-smiths and their task shall be to beat out
>laughter from the ringing anvil of life."
> -- Jack London
>finger red....@rahul.net for public kitty.
An intellectual debate between "Red" and "Doc Tavish" is kind of like
watching someone without dentures trying to eat corn. Neither of them is
equipped with the necessary tools to get the job done. Interestingly, they
do offer irrefutable proof that two half-wits don't add up to a whole wit.
Dr. Phlegming
>>Hey Yid, if and when you finally get hold of the FBI please ask them
>>what the hold up is on them sending me my updated decoder ring. BTW
>>have you received your Jethro Bodine double naught spy kit yet?
>
>> ` Doc Tavish
>
Matt Giwer, speaking from the bottom of a bottle of Wild Turkey belched in
response to another genetic reject (Doc Quackish):
> I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured by the
>ADL.
Why wait for the inevitable Matt. Take it now. After all, your fuhrer
didn't wait until the Russians were right in the bunker, did he?
Jack Garbuz
>>No DOC TAVISH IS A WANTED FELON, WANTED BY THE FBI FOR DEATH THREATS
>>SENT TO JEWS.
>
>what the hold up is on them sending me my updated decoder ring. BTW
>have you received your Jethro Bodine double naught spy kit yet?<
Hey is that the genuine Captain Midnight decoder ring? Wow.
Susan Cohen
John Winslow Brown wrote:
> Red <r...@rahul.net> wrote in article <99229@!>...
> > jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger) wrote:
> >
> > > We don't want him!
> >
> > You accept rape-murderers like Joel Rifkin, and you don't want peaceful
> > intellectuals like Doc Tavish?
>
> Remember Joseph is a descendent of those that cried to have Barrabas
> relaesd, who was also a murderer!
Since Jesus himself was a Jew, as was his entire family (you must believe
this if you believe what else you wrote) then your point (not the one under
your hat) is moot.
Susan Cohen
Doc Tavish wrote:
> On 23 Jan 1998 01:25:43 GMT, r...@rahul.net (Red) wrote:
>
> >Doc Tavish may be a Jew because he promotes Christianity.
> >
> >Christianity is Jewish.
>
> I know at least three people that would never ever believe that;
> Jeffrey G. Brown, Allan Matthews, and Gregory Taylor!
>
> Signed,
> Munching on a stale bagel, washing it down with Mogen David
> Doc Tavishstein :-)
>
> BTW I am not what you would call a "practicing Christian" and you have
> helped me when you've said that Jews created Christianity. The first
> Christians were Jews BUT is it not a hoot to watch the Pharisees go
> berserk when the Bible writings are held up to their faces!
Why should we care waht is in your Bible?
> I make it
> my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote
Er, we wrote the Torah. Or are you referring to the lies you people like to
tell about it?
> and when they go
> squaking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews!
Which only proves your mental incompetance: why should they complain to the
innocent about the lies you tell?
> That is my
> method!
Well, duh! What a surprise!
William Wallace
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 21:24:59 -0800, "Dr. Phlegming" <em...@dweeb.com>
wrote:
>>>Hey Yid, if and when you finally get hold of the FBI please ask them
>>>what the hold up is on them sending me my updated decoder ring. BTW
>>>have you received your Jethro Bodine double naught spy kit yet?
>>> ` Doc Tavish
>Matt Giwer, speaking from the bottom of a bottle of Wild Turkey belched in
>response to another genetic reject (Doc Quackish):
Again here we have kike-speak, the greatest intellectual
accomplishement of the Homo Kikus. This is the sort of thing that
rational discussion is supposed to eliminate.
Dr. Phlegming
William Wallace wrote in message <34cd9b0a....@news.mindspring.com>...
>On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 21:24:59 -0800, "Dr. Phlegming" <em...@dweeb.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>>Hey Yid, if and when you finally get hold of the FBI please ask them
>>>>what the hold up is on them sending me my updated decoder ring. BTW
>>>>have you received your Jethro Bodine double naught spy kit yet?
>
>>>> ` Doc Tavish
>
>>Matt Giwer, speaking from the bottom of a bottle of Wild Turkey belched in
>>response to another genetic reject (Doc Quackish):
>
> Again here we have kike-speak, the greatest intellectual
>accomplishement of the Homo Kikus. This is the sort of thing that
>rational discussion is supposed to eliminate.
Has Giwer been playing with his secret decoder ring again? Yours is the
furthest extreme of "rational discussion" on usenet. Have another shot of
Wild Turkey...it'll clear your head.
Dr. Phlegming
Herr Doktor Tavische wrote in message
<34ce906d....@news.smart1.net>...
>On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:11:28 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
>wrote:
>You wouldn't worry one bit about my religion or my IQ if we were at a
>Motel 6 and I dropped trou!
No Scotty the motel is a Travelodge. Your IQ is 6. So is the last grade
you passed. Remember Scotty SOME is different than ALL. Keep working on
it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Dr. Phlegming
William Wallace aka Matt "Pass me another Wild Turkey" Giwer took the straw
out of his mouth and dribbled in message
34cea9b7....@news.mindspring.com>...
>
> Excuse me but with so many homo kikus postings I do occasionally
>get dragged down to their level and then get quoted out of context by
>homo kikus. That is their intent and activity as is well known.
It would, of course, be impossible for Giwer to get dragged down to
anything's level. He'd have to climb Mount Everest in order to reach
planktonic levels. And since you want to engage in Latin...please meet Matt
Giwer-Moronus Maximus.
>
> It is well known that they call a person Nazi
I didn't call you a Nazi but it would be easy to characterize you as a
narrow-minded bigot and Nazi apologist.
>and then when the
>response is to call them kike they claim anti-semitism. It is an old
>game and well known to all (who are as dumb as Giwer). But they remain
kikes for playing it.
And you remain a drunken, time-wasting, drooling fool for your
non-contribution to humanity on a regular basis. By the way...you can still
do the honorable thing with your cyanide pill...just drop it in your next
shot of Yukon Jack and in one fell swoop a genetic mutant goes to his just
reward.
Matt Giwer signature: "Let every moron learn one word and learn it
well--REFILL!".
Herr Doktor Tavische
Herr Doktor Tavische
On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:14:52 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
wrote:
>John Winslow Brown wrote:
>
>> Red <r...@rahul.net> wrote in article <99229@!>...
>> > jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger) wrote:
>> >
>> > > We don't want him!
>> >
>> > You accept rape-murderers like Joel Rifkin, and you don't want peaceful
>> > intellectuals like Doc Tavish?
>>
>> Remember Joseph is a descendent of those that cried to have Barrabas
>> released, who was also a murderer!
>Since Jesus himself was a Jew, as was his entire family (you must believe
>this if you believe what else you wrote) then your point (not the one under
>your hat) is moot.
Susie Q, why do I get the mental image that you have some nice pretty
legs suspended from a nice hot juicy fruit booty (butt for those in
Rio Linda!). I bet that you make J.A.P. Alicia Silverstone look like a
veritable beast!
Let me give you some of this serious stuff though so you won't think
that I am harassing you. Okay?
................................................................................................
http://www.mcs.net/~kollel/www/halacha/fax210.html
HALACHA ON - LINE
In Memory of Rabbi Dov Ber Rosenblum z''l
a dedicated Torah scholar whose greatest love was the study and
clarification of Halacha
Food Preparations, Part One vol.2 no.10
In an effort to limit social mingling with our gentile neighbors and
the intermarriage which might result, our sages prohibited eating food
cooked by gentiles, even if all ingredients are kosher and the food is
cooked in a kosher vessel while under the watchful eye of a Jewish
supervisor.
Such food is referred to in Hebrew as bishul nochri or bishul akum. It
is particularly important to bear this isuue in mind if one has a
non-Jewish housekeeper or attendent who takes part in household
food preparation.
When establishing this prohibition, the sages excluded foods which
would have been fully edible prior to the cooking process. Therefore,
pasteurization of milk and juice, though typically done by non-Jews,
presents no bishul nochri problem. Some authorities use this exclusion
as the justification for the common practice to drink coffee or tea
cooked by a gentile. These drinks can be viewed as basically being
flavored water. As water is drinkable prior to any cooking, water and
by extension coffee and tea, are exempted from this prohibition. Other
examples within this category would be most fruit and those vegetables
which could be eaten raw.
Another category excluded from this prohibition is that of foods that
are not dignified enough to be served on shulchan melachim - literally
the table of kings or practically, as a dish at a fancy dinner.
Accordingly, if for example, a bowl of oatmeal was cooked by a
non-Jewish housekeeper, the bishul nochri prohibition does not apply.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Community Service of Kollel Toras Chesed of Skokie
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kol...@mcs.com Kollel Toras Chesed Voice (708) 674-7959 3732 W.
Dempster Fax (708) 674-4023 Skokie, IL 60076 BBS (708) 674-4023 Last
Revision: August 22, 1995
Halacha Online:
http://www.mcs.net/~kollel/www/halacha/halacha.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.mcs.net/~kollel/www/halacha/fax211.html
HALACHA ON - LINE
In Memory of Rabbi Dov Ber Rosenblum z''l
a dedicated Torah scholar whose greatest love was the study and
clarification of Halacha
Food Production part two vol.2 no.11
In our last issue we introduced the laws of bishul nochri .
We received certain questions regarding the common practice of kosher
caterers and commercial food producers. The following additional
guidelines provide significant insight into the halachic basis for
food preperation involving significant amounts of cooking by nochrim .
The prohibition of bishul nochri applies only if the entire cooking
process is done by the nochri . If a Jew places the food on the fire
or, according to the Ashkenazic view, if he ignites or increases the
fire, no bishul nochri problem can develop. Even if the cooking
process was initiated by a nochri , as long as it was substantially
completed by a Jew (e.g. the pot was removed from the fire before the
food can be considered cooked and then returned to the fire by a Jew)
the bishul nochri prohibition will generally not be present. In the
latter case other factors must be determined and halachic guidance is
suggested.
In keeping with this rule, if the food was previously cooked by a Jew
and is merely being reheated by the nochri , no problem arises.
In summary, the bishul nochri prohibition applies only if all of the
following conditions exist :
1.the food was not fit to be eaten prior to the cooking
2.the food is fit to be served as a dish at a formal meal
3.the food was cooked entirely by a nochri
In a situation in which bishul nochri did occur, the vessels in which
the food was cooked are regarded as having non-kosher absorptions. It
is therefore necessary to kasher them prior to further use. However,
since the prohibition involved is only of Rabbinic origin, some
leniencies do apply. If the utensil in question is for some halachic
or practical reason incapable of undergoing a typical absorption
removal process, Rabbinic guidance may yield allowance to use it
without the conventional kashering.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
One more about how Jews view non-Jews and this one is from B'nai
B'rith! I'll provide the link as I did for the other posts above!
From B'nai B'rith (Mother of ADL):
http://bnaibrith.org/ijm/articles/wine/index.html
Vineyard Vanguard:
The new taste of a well-aged tradition
By Joseph Berkofsky
[ ... ] (Excerpt used for "educational" purposes]
Like all other kosher food or drink, kosher wine cannot contain any
unkosher animal or fish products; to be kosher for Passover, it must
also not come in contact with any leavened grains.
But the law regarding wine extracts another, more pressing, demand: It
cannot be handled by non-Jews.
The roots of this law reach back to the ancient Land of Israel where,
to prevent Jews from drinking wines used in idol worship, Jewish law
forbade Jews to touch wine that had been moved in an open vessel by
non-Jews, since it was likely used as a wave offering. The rabbis
later went further in battling assimilation, declaring any wine
handled by a non-Jew unfit to drink.
Today, in order to ensure that a wine meets all the kashrut
requirements, the entire winemaking process from grape-crushing to
bottling is overseen by trained, Sabbath-observant Jews, or
mashgichim, who handle all flow of the wine. And, as Ben Welton, a
mashgiach for St. Supéry and others, can attest, this kind of kosher
supervision can mean as much toil as Torah.
With help from nearby non-Jewish winery workers, mashgichim operate
cranes to unload the grapes from trucks after the fall harvest. They
run the crushers which break the grapes, and pipe the crushed grapes
and juice into steel tanks. And they oversee the rest of the process
from fermentation, when yeast converts the grape's sugar into alcohol,
to filtering the wine and moving it into oak barrels to be aged.
At times, says Welton, this is dizzying work - literally. Not too long
ago, he recalls, he had to dig heavy heaps of stems from a huge
fermentation tank at St. Supéry - while wearing a lifeline to show
that he was not inhaling too much alcohol vapor.
Peak season for mashgichim like Welton is between August and January,
when most of the winemaking occurs. And, although a mashgiach need not
be on premises other than when the wine is being moved through the
process, mashgichim will occassionally return to inspect the wine as
it ages to ensure that it has not been touched by non-Jews.
But those wineries that wish to involve non-Jews in the process can
tap into a Talmudic ruling that makes this possible.
Rabbinic authorities decreed that wine, even if touched by non-Jews,
was fit for Jewish use so long as it was mevushal, or cooked. The idea
was, in part, that cooked wine is far less palatable and no one would
want to use it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Just for the record my lil' Chickadee, you're not into giving bad lil'
boys spankings are you? :-)
Herr Doktor Tavische
William Wallace
On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 10:23:21 -0800, "Dr. Phlegming" <em...@dweeb.com>
wrote:
>
>William Wallace wrote in message <34cd9b0a....@news.mindspring.com>...
>>On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 21:24:59 -0800, "Dr. Phlegming" <em...@dweeb.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>>>Hey Yid, if and when you finally get hold of the FBI please ask them
>>>>>what the hold up is on them sending me my updated decoder ring. BTW
>>>>>have you received your Jethro Bodine double naught spy kit yet?
>>
>>>>> ` Doc Tavish
>>
>>>Matt Giwer, speaking from the bottom of a bottle of Wild Turkey belched in
>>>response to another genetic reject (Doc Quackish):
>>
>> Again here we have kike-speak, the greatest intellectual
>>accomplishement of the Homo Kikus. This is the sort of thing that
>>rational discussion is supposed to eliminate.
>
>Has Giwer been playing with his secret decoder ring again? Yours is the
>furthest extreme of "rational discussion" on usenet. Have another shot of
>Wild Turkey...it'll clear your head.
Excuse me but with so many homo kikus postings I do occasionally
get dragged down to their level and then get quoted out of context by
homo kikus. That is their intent and activity as is well known.
It is well known that they call a person Nazi and then when the
response is to call them kike they claim anti-semitism. It is an old
game and well known to all. But they remain kikes for playing it.
Dr. Phlegming
William Wallace (aka Matt Giwer-an expert on "getting gassed") wrote in
message <34cfcb3e....@news.mindspring.com>...
>On 29 Jan 1998 08:46:33 +1100, gra...@daveney.matra.com.au (Graham
>Daveney) wrote:
>
>>Herr Doktor Tavische (doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com) wrote:
>>: On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 16:44:45 GMT, mad...@uscom.com wrote:
>
>>: >No DOC TAVISH IS A WANTED FELON, WANTED BY THE FBI FOR DEATH THREATS
>>: >SENT TO JEWS. RLA IS HIS BEST FRIEND SO I HEAR.
>
>>: I bet you dream about Nazis every night. When you can't go to sleep at
>>: night you count SS Supermen as that gallantly jump over your bed. You
>>: must see Nazi SS Supermen behind every bush. In most cases you are
>>: right. Nazis here, Nazis there, Nazis are every where. They're the
>>: butchers, the bakers, the candlestick makers! They're in the police
>>: force. They're every where. Yesssss every where and they are waiting
>>: for just the right moment to pop up anywhere! You'll never know,
>>: you'll never see from which direction they came. One could be looking
>>: over your shoulder right now as you read this! In fact one may pop out
>>: at any moment and......
>
>>: >madayn
>
>>This is inhuman and disgusting.
>
>>Why don't you go and repeat your revolting little post to Holocaust
survivor ?
>
> If they survived they were not gassed were they.
>
>>Jewish fear of Nazi's and Nazism is built on very real facts.
>
> It is still psychotic.
Hardly for anyone who witnessed the atrocities. The psychotic is very
clearly Matt Giwer. A man who allowed a drinking problem to lead to
clinical psychosis.
>
>>I'm sure that G-d will reward you for your efforts.
>
> Hyphenated gods don't get very far. Yours is very hyphenated.
The one true G-d worshipped by the majority of people in this world will get
as far as He wants. You will find out just how far on Judgement Day Matt
Giwer. Try to be sober just that once, will you?
William Wallace
>Herr Doktor Tavische (doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com) wrote:
>: On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 16:44:45 GMT, mad...@uscom.com wrote:
>: >No DOC TAVISH IS A WANTED FELON, WANTED BY THE FBI FOR DEATH THREATS
>: >SENT TO JEWS. RLA IS HIS BEST FRIEND SO I HEAR.
>: I bet you dream about Nazis every night. When you can't go to sleep at
>: night you count SS Supermen as that gallantly jump over your bed. You
>: must see Nazi SS Supermen behind every bush. In most cases you are
>: right. Nazis here, Nazis there, Nazis are every where. They're the
>: butchers, the bakers, the candlestick makers! They're in the police
>: force. They're every where. Yesssss every where and they are waiting
>: for just the right moment to pop up anywhere! You'll never know,
>: you'll never see from which direction they came. One could be looking
>: over your shoulder right now as you read this! In fact one may pop out
>: at any moment and......
>: >madayn
>This is inhuman and disgusting.
>Why don't you go and repeat your revolting little post to Holocaust survivor ?
If they survived they were not gassed were they.
>Jewish fear of Nazi's and Nazism is built on very real facts.
It is still psychotic.
>I'm sure that G-d will reward you for your efforts.
Hyphenated gods don't get very far. Yours is very hyphenated.
=====
William Wallace
On Wed, 28 Jan 1998 20:42:34 -0800, "Dr. Phlegming" <em...@dweeb.com>
wrote:
>
>William Wallace (aka Matt Giwer-an expert on "getting gassed") wrote in
>message <34cfcb3e....@news.mindspring.com>...
>>On 29 Jan 1998 08:46:33 +1100, gra...@daveney.matra.com.au (Graham
>>Daveney) wrote:
>>>: >madayn
>>>This is inhuman and disgusting.
>>>Why don't you go and repeat your revolting little post to Holocaust
>survivor ?
>> If they survived they were not gassed were they.
>>>Jewish fear of Nazi's and Nazism is built on very real facts.
>> It is still psychotic.
>Hardly for anyone who witnessed the atrocities. The psychotic is very
>clearly Matt Giwer. A man who allowed a drinking problem to lead to
>clinical psychosis.
You witnessed nothing. People who witnessed nothing are
psychotic. The rest are approaching their drooling years and are not
to be taken any more seriously now than when the Communists got them
to lie under oath.
>>>I'm sure that G-d will reward you for your efforts.
>> Hyphenated gods don't get very far. Yours is very hyphenated.
>The one true G-d worshipped by the majority of people in this world will get
>as far as He wants. You will find out just how far on Judgement Day Matt
>Giwer. Try to be sober just that once, will you?
Here was have it. A superstitious tribesman rambling on about his
hyphenated god.
An ape named Ape and a god named God. Right from George of the
Jungle.
Susan Cohen
Herr Doktor Tavische wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:11:28 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Doc Tavish wrote:
> >
> >> I make it
> >> my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote
> >
> >Er, we wrote the Torah. Or are you referring to the lies you people like to
> >tell about it?
> >
> >> and when they go
> >> squaking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews!
> >
> >Which only proves your mental incompetance: why should they complain to the
> >innocent about the lies you tell?
> >
> >> That is my
> >> method!
> >
> >Well, duh! What a surprise!
>
> You wouldn't worry one bit about my religion or my IQ if we were at a
> Motel 6 and I dropped trou!
If I understand this correctly, it is either a silly way to dodge the point of you
not being very smart, or it is an even sillier "threat" that makes me ooooohh so
scared!
(I'm assuming "trou" is some sort of misprint for something?)
Dr. Phlegming
William Wallace wrote in message <34d0d47f....@news.mindspring.com>...
Matt Giwer in the role of the Ape probably his greatest skill in life.
No...actually his second greatest skill. Getting gassed is Giwer's greatest
skill. So much anger Giwer...you should try being a happy drunk instead of
such an angry drunk.
Doc Tavish
On Thu, 29 Jan 1998 18:19:05 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
wrote:
>Herr Doktor Tavische wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:11:28 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
>> wrote:
>> >Doc Tavish wrote:
>> >
>> >> I make it
>> >> my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote
>> >Er, we wrote the Torah. Or are you referring to the lies you people like to
>> >tell about it?
>> >> and when they go
>> >> squawking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews!
>> >Which only proves your mental incompetance: why should they complain to the
>> >innocent about the lies you tell?
>> >> That is my
>> >> method!
>> >Well, duh! What a surprise!
>> You wouldn't worry one bit about my religion or my IQ if we were at a
>> Motel 6 and I dropped trou!
>If I understand this correctly, it is either a silly way to dodge the point of you
>not being very smart, or it is an even sillier "threat" that makes me ooooohh so
>scared!
I made no threat towards you my sweet little cup of nectar. Even my
most rabid opponents won't even accuse me of ever threatening harm to
any Jewess in the group. I am the Love Doctor! I would only make you
feel exquisite pleasure and a tingling all over your body BUT never
would I inflict pain on you! You don't even remember me telling others
they had better not harm my dear Susan do you?
I guess I'll have to remind you!
From DejaNews archives:
http://x2.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=295080620&CONTEXT=886192977.1938423945&hitnum=4
Subject: Speak To Me of Love Susie Q! (was Re: More trailer-trash
stupidity. WAS: Media controls your minds, etc.)
From: bru...@bruno.com (Bruno Eckhardt)
Date: 1997/12/04
Message-ID: <348604a8....@news.smart1.net>
On Tue, 02 Dec 1997 16:55:56 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
wrote:
>Gunther Schiller wrote:
>> On Mon, 01 Dec 1997 02:14:43 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
>> wrote:
>> >Yeah, right. We control the world. That's why we can't get off for
>> >our holidays (at least in the US) while all the Christians do
>> >automatically.
>> This is part of your deception my dear!
>> Das ist scheiteln deiner täuschung mein lieb!
See Susie Q; you even called me honey:
>Yeah, honey - we're so clever that you found us out. Can't have it both
>ways, sweetie.
>> Looking powerless; what better way to deceive is there?
>> Kiekend machtlos; was besser weg bis trüge ist da?
>Except that people like you have been saying this for so long that we are
>obviously failing in our objective if we haven't accomplished the goal
>yet.
>> Your love of money is satisfied with Gentile holidays not your
>> holidays! Dein liebe von geld ist befriedigt mit Gentile feiertage
>> nicht dein feiertage!
>What on earth is this supposed to mean?
You can't or won't make money from yourselves; you need Gentiles. We
hear often how smart Jews are and that is why they are wealthy. I say
if this is so and it is to a very great degree where Jews have set up
shop in Gentile lands; then why aren't Israeli Jews rich as well? They
don't have enough Gentiles there to blood suck from!
You can only generate your wealth from exploitation of Gentile efforts
NEVER any of your own. I am not speaking as individuals but as a
tribe! The Old Testament is filled with exploitation of Gentiles!
Look and behold sweetie pie!
Loaning money:
"He [the Jew] should not press his fellow [Jew] for payment.. the
foreigner [Gentile] you may press for payment..." Deuteronomy 15: 2,3
"You must not make your brother pay interest, interest on money,
interest on food, interest on anything on which one may claim
interest. You may make a foreigner [Gentile] pay interest but your
brother [fellow Jew] you must not make pay interest."
Deuteronomy 23: 19,20
[ ... ]
Why do Jews want their own cemetaries? Because they don't want to be
buried with unclean beast? Answer me honey bun! Why do rabbis condemn
marrying to Gentiles but think nothing about marrying a Jew to a
Jewish homosexual? How many Jews marry African-Americans? If a Gentile
Caucasian speaks against this then he/she is racist but you as a group
condemn it too! If you didn't we'd see it in practice!
I can also show show Talmudic "verses" which say that Gentiles are
but beasts. Do you wish to deny the existence of these?
I promise you that if I were a beast then I would have already eaten
you all up sweet cookie but I haven't!
>> Besides, you love us!
>> Außerdem, dich liebe uns!
>You must love us, the way you are obsessed with us!
You're the one that dropped in on us or do you have the wrong address
snookems? This is an area where a bunch of Nazis, knaves, ne'er do
wells, pirates, wompeters, and tranfalooms hang out. You were probably
walking along and thought you were entering soc.culture.jewish.
Well I haven't any yiddishe momme! :-)
Be a sweet little tart and mind your manners and I will see that no
one gets rough with the Little Princess!
Bruno (The Beast)
Ich gerecht liebe klein Jüdisch mädchen aber Ich
hasse das Jüdisch jungen! Test dich habe gut
rücken aufhören? Ich denke dass dich bist ein
süss herz!
~~~~~~~~~~~ END ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>(I'm assuming "trou" is some sort of misprint for something?)
To drop "trou" is the preliminary step to wild wanton sex in which two
people get themselves electrically charged! Now do you know what drop
"trou" means? Trou is slang for trousers!
You didn't even notice me standing up for you in my previous post when
I said: "Be a sweet little tart and mind your manners and I will see
that no one gets rough with the Little Princess!"
Now has anyone been rough with you sweet little booger and the apple
of my eye? There are many of us in this news group that will drop trou
for you because we all still love womenkind and we know that Jewish
males do not have it in them to really give you J.A.P.s a durn good
trouncing.
Now don't be all upset because I was mentioning in helping you make it
over the hump because I am out in the open with you and I have NOT
e-mailed you NOR will I. If you want my ary*n bratwurst then go
through a third party mediator and I'll take the McTavish Fan Jet
Citation to any airport that has a paved runway with at least 6500
ft., jet A fuel and ILS glideslope capabilities!
Hope I'll be coming your way soon dear heart. Now, do I come across as
a bigot? ^^^^^
I still won't let any of dem dammed ol' natsies hurt my sugar booger!
Doc Tavish
Richard G. Philllips
Susan Cohen wrote:
>
> Herr Doktor Tavische wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:11:28 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >Doc Tavish wrote:
> > >
> > >> I make it
> > >> my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote
> > >
> > >Er, we wrote the Torah. Or are you referring to the lies you people like to
> > >tell about it?
> > >
> > >> and when they go
> > >
> > >Which only proves your mental incompetance:
=======================================
Phillips
No doubt many have noticed the frequent appearance of epithets such as
"idiot, moron, mental incompetent," etc. There is a reason for this. The
Jew prizes intellectual capacity above all other
things, imagines himself to be superior in that regard, and finds
his/her greatest joy in an
opportunity to impute mental incompetance to an Aryan adversary.
However, when examined more closely, their self-proclaimed mental
superiority often turns out to be little more than a certain skill at
facile verbalizing and artful evasion.
================================================
Avital Pilpel
Matt Giwer wrote:
> I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured by
> the
> ADL.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Hey, Matt! I told the ADL where you live!
Better take that capsule NOW, before it's too late!
Roger Alexander
Avital Pilpel wrote:
Mildly stupid post. Lukewarm. Not worth the bother.
RLA
george
Jack Garbuz wrote:
> You know, I don't fully understand the antisemitic mind, though I think I
> understand most of it. Why millions of White, Black and other men and
> women should get so exercised over one rather small minority group, the
> Jews, escapes me. There is no need to deal with Jews, talk to Jews, live
> alongside JEws, etc. if you really don't want to. I mean, Jews can be
> avoided if you really put your mind to it. I know that I would never go
> on the NG of some little ethnic group that I didn't care for and spend
> years of my life persecuting or arguing with them. All I would try to do
> is avoid them if at all possible. Why do you people do it? What is the
> impulse. Is it a game like, let's see if we can finish Hitler's work? Or
> something like that? Nonetheless, I do know that it is an obsession and
> therefore I have no choice but to grapple with people like you because
> otherwise I must agree with you and commit suicide.
>
> I believe I have the right to exist whether you people like it or not and
> will try my best to do so. However, you have allies, the liberal Jews who
> really feel that they are bad and have no right to exist unless you like
> them or they can gain your approval, Hence to get the love and the
> approval of the world they will sacrifice themselves and their people
> just to prove what really good people they are. "Peace Now" is the
> perfect example of such a group. For the applause of the world they are
> prepared to tear their own hearts out and lift them up before the world.
> They are the harlots mentioned by the prophets who are so disgusting and
> corrupt that they pay their Johns to fuck them. That is your natural
> audience RLA.
Agree, and your ofrgot to add to the audience list, Arabs, Nazis and other
deviants.
Jack Garbuz
Gord McFee
> Susan Cohen wrote:
> >
> > Herr Doktor Tavische wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:11:28 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Doc Tavish wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I make it
> > > >> my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote
> > > >
> > > >Er, we wrote the Torah. Or are you referring to the lies you people like to
> > > >tell about it?
> > > >
> > > >> and when they go
> > > >> squaking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews!
> > > >
> > > >Which only proves your mental incompetance:
>
> =======================================
> Phillips
>
> No doubt many have noticed the frequent appearance of epithets such as
> "idiot, moron, mental incompetent," etc. There is a reason for this. The
> Jew prizes intellectual capacity above all other
> things, imagines himself to be superior in that regard, and finds
> his/her greatest joy in an
> opportunity to impute mental incompetance to an Aryan adversary.
Actually, Mr. Phillips, you will find that the usual reason for the
appearance of words like "moron", idiot" and so on is because they so
accurately describe the denier trash.
--
Gord McFee <gmc...@ibm.net>
I'll write no line before its time
Richard G. Philllips
================================================
PHillips
See what I mean?
==========================================
William Wallace
On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 16:06:41 -0500, Avital Pilpel <ap...@columbia.edu>
wrote:
>Matt Giwer wrote:
>
>> I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured by
>> the
>> ADL.
>
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
>
>Hey, Matt! I told the ADL where you live!
>
>Better take that capsule NOW, before it's too late!
My life has been threaten as have the lifes of my family by jews.
My parents were harrassed by Ken McVay, an employee of the ADL. You
tell me how I should take it.
DR. MEOFF
>>> Simply , Doc Tavish is no-way in any manner a j*w. Never was and never
will be.
Richard G. Philllips wrote in message <34D404...@earthlink.net>...
Laura Finsten
Richard G. Philllips wrote:
> Gord McFee wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 04:42:56, "Richard G. Philllips"
> > <rgp...@earthlink.net> wrote:
[...]
> > > No doubt many have noticed the frequent appearance of epithets such as
> > > "idiot, moron, mental incompetent," etc. There is a reason for this. The
> > > Jew prizes intellectual capacity above all other
> > > things, imagines himself to be superior in that regard, and finds
> > > his/her greatest joy in an
> > > opportunity to impute mental incompetance to an Aryan adversary.
> > Actually, Mr. Phillips, you will find that the usual reason for the
> > appearance of words like "moron", idiot" and so on is because they so
> > accurately describe the denier trash.
[...]
> See what I mean?
Perhaps there _is_ a better term to capture the intellectual
inconsistency inherent in a view which hold racists beholden to IQ
scores as a measure of the intelligence of groups of people, racially
defined or otherwise. Until, that is, the same statistic which
demonstrates the so-called intellectual inferiority of blacks shows the
intellectual superiority to whites of Jews.
Stupid and/or hypocritical come to mind.
--
"If I can't dance.....I don't want to be part of your revolution."
Emma Goldman
mad...@uscom.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Roger Alexander <rla...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>
>Avital Pilpel wrote:
>
>> Matt Giwer wrote:
>>
>> > I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever
>captured by
>> > the
>> > ADL.
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
>>
>> Hey, Matt! I told the ADL where you live!
>>
>> Better take that capsule NOW, before it's too late!
>
> Mildly stupid post. Lukewarm. Not worth the bother.
>RLA
Yet the NEO-Nazi WANT TO BE RLA DOES BOTHER
*************************************************
* This message has been signed with the support *
* of an unregistered copy of PGPeep (tm), the *
* Forte (Free) Agent <-> PGP 5.0 interface. *
* *
* Details: http://www.poboxes.com/pgpeep/ *
*************************************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQBVAwUBNNTzlg2NH8urM3q5AQEbdAH+M3aF8F7q8heLUO5zbYC+QJuX4mtAkTvF
m8L3RdMfNL9KwtTr4ly4jKHKJPVTPv8dk+Oa+Xo5QbpW12Ebc6Sh9Q==
=30KJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
madayn
Avital Pilpel
Roger Alexander wrote:
> Avital Pilpel wrote:
>
> > Matt Giwer wrote:
> >
> > > I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured
> by
> > > the
> > > ADL.
> >
> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
> >
> > Hey, Matt! I told the ADL where you live!
> >
> > Better take that capsule NOW, before it's too late!
>
> Mildly stupid post. Lukewarm. Not worth the bother.
> RLA
So why did _you_ bother?
Avital Pilpel
Matt Giwer wrote:
> >> I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured
> by
> >> the
> >> ADL.
> My life has been threaten as have the lifes of my family by
> jews.
Er.... so your precaution against _death threats_ is to have a _suicide
pill_ ?????
ROTFLMAO!
Dr. Phlegming
William Wallace wrote in message <34d435ff....@news.mindspring.com>...
>On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 16:06:41 -0500, Avital Pilpel <ap...@columbia.edu>
>wrote:
>
>>Matt Giwer wrote:
>>
>>> I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured by
>>> the
>>> ADL.
>>
>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
>>
>>Hey, Matt! I told the ADL where you live!
>>
>>Better take that capsule NOW, before it's too late!
>
> My life has been threaten as have the lifes of my family by jews.
>My parents were harrassed by Ken McVay, an employee of the ADL. You
>tell me how I should take it.
>
What Matt! Tell you how you should take a cyanide capsule? Whenever you
want with a glass of water. Or, if you want, you can mix it in your
favorite drink a double shot of Wild Turkey. That way you won't even notice
when you pass out.
Roger Alexander
Avital Pilpel wrote:
> Roger Alexander wrote:
>
> > Avital Pilpel wrote:
> >
> > > Matt Giwer wrote:
> > >
> > > > I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured
> > by
> > > > the
> > > > ADL.
> > >
> > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
> > >
> > > Hey, Matt! I told the ADL where you live!
> > >
> > > Better take that capsule NOW, before it's too late!
> >
> > Mildly stupid post. Lukewarm. Not worth the bother.
> > RLA
>
> So why did _you_ bother?
No bother.
But thanks for asking.
RLa
Glenda the Good
r...@rahul.net (Red) wrote:
>doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
>
>> BTW I am not what you would call a "practicing Christian" and you have
>> helped me when you've said that Jews created Christianity. The first
>> Christians were Jews BUT is it not a hoot to watch the Pharisees go
>> berserk when the Bible writings are held up to their faces! I make it
>> my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote and when they go
>> squaking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews! That is my
>> method!
>
>The Bible, Koran and Talmud is a big load of superstitious crap that
>isn't close to being factual; it doesn't even make good fiction.
>
>Christians, Jews and Islamists are ALL superstitious assholes, but Jews
>are by far the stupidest, and have contributed the least to the world
>by their fudge-packin superstitious cults.
>
Lil 'ol Red. Hmmm. You appear to be, much like that idiot "tavish" a
simple clueless dolt. And I do mean clueless.
The problem is, it's such a pity. I honestly and sincerely pray for
you.
Glenda, the Good
>--
>"All will be joy-smiths and their task shall be to beat out
>laughter from the ringing anvil of life."
> -- Jack London
>finger red....@rahul.net for public kitty.
schier
Avital Pilpel wrote:
>
> Matt Giwer wrote:
>
> > >> I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured
> > by
> > >> the
> > >> ADL.
>
> > jews.
>
> pill_ ?????
May he merit to use it very, very soon!!!
Yitzchak
>
> ROTFLMAO!
Grigori Khaskin
schier (nxr...@cityline.ru) wrote:
: Yitzchak
: >
: > ROTFLMAO!
My humble opinion here:
Dear shmack giwer, cianide is not very efficient for insects like you.
Please use for suicide purposes a double dose and do not forget a capsule
with piretrum as a surething.
Sincerely,
G.K.
Doc Tavish
On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:14:52 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
wrote:
>
>
>John Winslow Brown wrote:
>
>> Red <r...@rahul.net> wrote in article <99229@!>...
>> > jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger) wrote:
>> >
>> > > We don't want him!
>> >
>> > You accept rape-murderers like Joel Rifkin, and you don't want peaceful
>> > intellectuals like Doc Tavish?
>>
>> Remember Joseph is a descendent of those that cried to have Barrabas
>> relaesd, who was also a murderer!
>Since Jesus himself was a Jew, as was his entire family (you must believe
>this if you believe what else you wrote) then your point (not the one under
>your hat) is moot.
Why do I get the distinct impression that you smell real nice and nice
smooth legs that I would want to lay my head on?
Doc Tavish
Doc Tavish
On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 08:31:46 GMT, William...@freeedom.org
(William Wallace) wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Jan 1998 21:24:59 -0800, "Dr. Phlegming" <em...@dweeb.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>>Hey Yid, if and when you finally get hold of the FBI please ask them
>>>>what the hold up is on them sending me my updated decoder ring. BTW
>>>>have you received your Jethro Bodine double naught spy kit yet?
>
>>>> ` Doc Tavish
>
>>Matt Giwer, speaking from the bottom of a bottle of Wild Turkey belched in
>>response to another genetic reject (Doc Quackish):
>
> Again here we have kike-speak, the greatest intellectual
>accomplishement of the Homo Kikus. This is the sort of thing that
>rational discussion is supposed to eliminate.
In case you or anyone else does not know- ol' Dr. Phlegmglob is Andrew
Mathis. Andrew has the privelege of being in the NETSCUM HALL of
DISHONOR.
Click here to go see:
http://www.spambusters.dyn.ml.org/www.netscum.net/index_0.html
Once there just go to M for Mathis, find his name, and click. They
have done a pioneer job in reviewing Dr. Phlegmglob too!
Doc Tavish
>>> I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured by the
>>>ADL.
>>
>>Why wait for the inevitable Matt. Take it now. After all, your fuhrer
>>didn't wait until the Russians were right in the bunker, did he?
William Wallace
On Sun, 1 Feb 1998 16:55:49 -0800, "Dr. Phlegming" <em...@dweeb.com>
wrote:
>
>William Wallace wrote in message <34d435ff....@news.mindspring.com>...
>>On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 16:06:41 -0500, Avital Pilpel <ap...@columbia.edu>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>
>>>> I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured by
>>>> the
>>>> ADL.
>>>
>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
>>>
>>>Hey, Matt! I told the ADL where you live!
>>>
>>>Better take that capsule NOW, before it's too late!
>>
>> My life has been threaten as have the lifes of my family by jews.
>>My parents were harrassed by Ken McVay, an employee of the ADL. You
>>tell me how I should take it.
>>
>
>What Matt! Tell you how you should take a cyanide capsule? Whenever you
>want with a glass of water. Or, if you want, you can mix it in your
>favorite drink a double shot of Wild Turkey. That way you won't even notice
>when you pass out.
I want to thank you and all the rest for playing and agreeing by
your posts that all of they Zyklon B stories do not describe death by
cyanide. You folks have been a great help here. Much appreciated.
Richard G. Philllips
=======================================================
PHillips
I'm having a problem with your sentence structure. did you mean to say
something like this:
Since racists regard blacks as inferior to whites on account of their
lower IQ scores, should they not --by the same token-- admit that Aryan
whites are inferior to Jews for a similar reason?
Is that what you were trying to say?
I am unaware of any studies of the second type: Jews vs., Aryan whites
but, after a professional life of more than 45 years, my impression is
that Jewish intelligence is about the same as that of urban white
professionals; possibly a bit more; possibly a bit less, but not by
much.
It may well be the case that Jewish intelligence is higher than that of
Aryan whites, generally. But what are we to make of this? The importance
of IQ is not in ascertaining one's potential to become a lawyer or a
doctor (we have far too many of both and would be better off without
them). It is in ascertaining one's potential to become a functioning
member of society. The IQs of Negroes are so low as to inhibit their
ability to function in the society we now have. the same is not true of
non-professional whites.
There are certain kinds of intelligence we can do well without. It was
largely the superior intelligence of Jews that brought Bolshevism to
Russia.
===================================================
DR. MEOFF
>>> Its nice to be wanted. Every race now claims Doc Tavish as their own. So
what was the point?
Doc Tavish wrote in message <34d52322...@news.phoenix.net>...
Albert Reingewirtz
In article <6b0piv$p...@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>, Jack Garbuz
<JGA...@postoffice.worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> Roger Alexander <rla...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Avital Pilpel wrote:
> >
> >> Matt Giwer wrote:
> >>
> >> > I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever captured by
> >> > the
> >> > ADL.
> >>
> >> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
> >>
> >> Hey, Matt! I told the ADL where you live!
> >>
> >> Better take that capsule NOW, before it's too late!
> >
> > Mildly stupid post. Lukewarm. Not worth the bother.<
>
> You know, I don't fully understand the antisemitic mind, though I think I
> understand most of it. Why millions of White, Black and other men and
> women should get so exercised over one rather small minority group, the
> Jews, escapes me. There is no need to deal with Jews, talk to Jews, live
> alongside JEws, etc. if you really don't want to. I mean, Jews can be
> avoided if you really put your mind to it. I know that I would never go
> on the NG of some little ethnic group that I didn't care for and spend
> years of my life persecuting or arguing with them. All I would try to do
> is avoid them if at all possible. Why do you people do it? What is the
> impulse. Is it a game like, let's see if we can finish Hitler's work? Or
> something like that? Nonetheless, I do know that it is an obsession and
> therefore I have no choice but to grapple with people like you because
> otherwise I must agree with you and commit suicide.
>
> I believe I have the right to exist whether you people like it or not and
> will try my best to do so. However, you have allies, the liberal Jews who
> really feel that they are bad and have no right to exist unless you like
> them or they can gain your approval, Hence to get the love and the
> approval of the world they will sacrifice themselves and their people
> just to prove what really good people they are.
You were doing so well! Why must you be such a crud? I am as liberal as the
next guy and I do not give a shit what people think of me. What do I care
what others think of me? I care deeply about the Jewish people. I will
always feel that I am part of it although I am nauseated by those who dress
in black and take upon themselves the right to tell other Jews what they
can or can't do.
>"Peace Now" is the
> perfect example of such a group. For the applause of the world they are
> prepared to tear their own hearts out and lift them up before the world.
> They are the harlots mentioned by the prophets who are so disgusting and
> corrupt that they pay their Johns to fuck them. That is your natural
> audience RLA.
Nice language! Did you learn this while at a yeshiva and going to strip
joints? Can you show any evidence to support your crap? Can you understand
Israeli mothers being tired of having their sons dying so that O's can go
and pray on the graves of some long dead "saints" while O's are safe and
cosy in their yeshivot?
--
God can't be dead, it never existed
george
Tony my dear (Doc-dick)
You are really sick. There are many good doctor in Detroit. They can take
Medicare. Also the VA can take you in. Is this from the Korean war or Koran war.
John Winslow Brown
Glenda the Good <gle...@medlib.ornam.wvnvm.com> wrote in article
<34d50ce1...@wvnvm.wvnet.edu>...
> r...@rahul.net (Red) wrote:
>
> >doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
> >
> >> BTW I am not what you would call a "practicing Christian" and you have
> >> helped me when you've said that Jews created Christianity. The first
> >> Christians were Jews BUT is it not a hoot to watch the Pharisees go
> >> berserk when the Bible writings are held up to their faces! I make it
> >> my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote and when they go
> >> squaking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews! That is my
> >> method!
> >
> >The Bible, Koran and Talmud is a big load of superstitious crap that
> >isn't close to being factual; it doesn't even make good fiction.
> >
> >Christians, Jews and Islamists are ALL superstitious assholes, but Jews
> >are by far the stupidest, and have contributed the least to the world
> >by their fudge-packin superstitious cults.
> >
> Lil 'ol Red. Hmmm. You appear to be, much like that idiot "tavish" a
> simple clueless dolt. And I do mean clueless.
>
> The problem is, it's such a pity. I honestly and sincerely pray for
> you.
>
> Glenda, the Good
Glenda, you know that Tavish is circumsized because you couldn't help but
notice when you two were at the Motel 6 last December. Just because he had
a weenie whack before he was 6 months old and had no choice doesn't mean
he's a Jew! I have to protect my cousin from defamation by bigoted Jewry.
Sir John Winslow Brown
John Winslow Brown
Gregory, you are rather pathetic with your name calling and personal
attacks but these attacks will not get me to stop posting what I am finding
at all of those bigoted Jewish websites!
So you get an idea of what I am speaking of behold:
http://www.kashrus.org/kosher/supervis.html
[ ... ]
.... Wine, more than any other food or drink, represents the holiness
and separateness of the Jewish people.
It is used for the sanctification of Shabbat and Yom Tovand at Jewish
simchot. In the Beit Hamikdash wine was poured upon the Altar together
with the sacrifice. However, since wine was and still is used in many
forms of idolatrous worship, it has a unique status in Jewish Law,
which places extra restrictions on the making and handling of wine.
This includes wine used for non ceremonial purposes.
The production and handling of kosher wine must be done exclusively by
Jews. Wine, grape juice, and all products containing wine or grape
juice must remain solely in Jewish hands during the manufacturing
process and also after the seal of the bottle has been opened.
We are not allowed to drink any wine or grape juice, or any drink
containing wine or grape juice, which has been touched by a non Jew
after the seal of the bottle has been opened.
[ ... ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All of the above applies to you if you are a Gentile! Click the link
and verify for yourself the bigotry of Jewry. All of the above is
their words NOT mine! I will keep posting this material from all the
sources that I find it to wake you all up!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More bigotry from the same web page:
Grape Ingredients In Processed Foods: All liquids produced from fresh
or dried grapes, whether alcoholic or non alcoholic, such as grape
juice and wine vinegar, are in the same category as wine in Jewish
Law.
Therefore foods with grape flavoring or additives must aiways have a
reliable hechsher; examples are jam, soda, popsicles, candy, juice
packed fruit, fruit punch, and lemonade.
Alcoholic drinks such as cognac and brandy have wine bases. Liqueurs
and blended whiskeys are often blended with wine. All such beverages
require kashnut supervision, as does herring in wine sauce. Cream of
tartar is made from wine sediment and needs Rabbinical supervision.
All baked goods must have reliable kashrut certification. Some
bakeries in Jewish communities carry the certification from a local
Orthodox Rabbi or the kashrut board in that city.
In addition, bread, cake and other baked goods from a Jewish bakery
with reliable kashnut certification often ensures not only the kashrut
of these products but also that they are patYisrael. It is preferable
to use pat Yisrael products whenever possible. This means that a
Jewish person has baked or assisted in the baking of the products.
Even if he simply lit the oven he is considered as having assisted.
Non commercial bread and cake that is completely baked by an
individual non Jew is called pat akum and may not be eaten.
[ ... ]
Certain foods which were completely cooked by a non Jew (disbud akum)
may not be eaten, even if the foods are kosher and are cooked in
kosher utensils.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I left your pitiful effort to smear me intact. The lurker knows who is
seeking truth and who is trying to hide it!
............................................................................
........................................
gta...@msn.fullfeed.com wrote in article
<886785632...@dejanews.com>...
> Scott "I can't out-think this woman, so I think I'll fantasize
> about her" Bradbury w/John Winslow Brown cognitive prophylaxis:
>
>
> > Glenda, you know that Tavish is circumsized because you couldn't help
but
> > notice when you two were at the Motel 6 last December. Just because he
had
> > a weenie whack before he was 6 months old and had no choice doesn't
mean
> > he's a Jew! I have to protect my cousin from defamation by bigoted
Jewry.
>
> Back before the folks at Phoenix.net decided to crack down on poor ol'
> cowardly Scott, his usual tactic when confronted with a certain backlog
> of postings which make him look stupid was to invent another imaginary
> playmate and work himself into a vicarious lather fantasizing about oral
> sex. This must be the new version. At the heart of it, we've still got
the
> same pathetic loser who'd rather invent some tawdry narcissistic nonsense
> than face the person he's become and the world in which he *really* finds
> himself.
>
> Glenda, the general opinion would seem to hold that Scott's actually
> unable to function without these little "outlets" of his; they alternate
> with the frantic reposting of information that Scottie's clearly unable
> to make any rational sense out of - as if he can't decide whether he has
> a greater need to make himself into something other than a lone moron in
> a decaying orbit around Houston or to legitimatize his bigotry by his
> poor imitation of propositionalizing. The reality of his existence nearly
> guarantees failure in the former case, and his regularly demonstrated
> educational deficits doom the former.
>
> -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
>
A. G. Phillbin
In article <34d52322...@news.phoenix.net>, doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:14:52 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>John Winslow Brown wrote:
>>
>>> Red <r...@rahul.net> wrote in article <99229@!>...
>>> > jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger) wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > We don't want him!
>>> >
>>> > You accept rape-murderers like Joel Rifkin, and you don't want peaceful
>>> > intellectuals like Doc Tavish?
Joel Rifkin they may be forced to accept, you they don't need. You are
"peaceful" only because of your cowardice, but what qualifies you as an
"intellectual?" I mean, besides the fact that you do nothing but sit on your
ass copying stuff onto the usenet?
>>>
>>> Remember Joseph is a descendent of those that cried to have Barrabas
>>> relaesd, who was also a murderer!
>
>>Since Jesus himself was a Jew, as was his entire family (you must believe
>>this if you believe what else you wrote) then your point (not the one under
>>your hat) is moot.
>
>Why do I get the distinct impression that you smell real nice and nice
>smooth legs that I would want to lay my head on?
Why do I get the impression that you are a virginal adolescent who stammers
and stutters in the presence of any reasonably attracive female?
>
> Doc Tavish
A. G. Phillbin
In article <01bd3348$25f1afe0$1279f1cd@msn-net>, "John Winslow Brown" <bro...@DELETEME.hotmailed.com> wrote:
>Gregory, you are rather pathetic with your name calling and personal
>attacks but these attacks will not get me to stop posting what I am finding
>at all of those bigoted Jewish websites!
>
>So you get an idea of what I am speaking of behold:
>
>http://www.kashrus.org/kosher/supervis.html
>
>[ ... ]
>
Yes, the lurker indeed does know that, and who is using a fake email address.
What a brilliant riposte!
>.............................................................................
>.........................................
A. G. Phillbin
In article <01bd32e8$06831fa0$1279f1cd@msn-net>, "John Winslow Brown" <bro...@DELETEME.hotmailed.com> wrote:
>
>
>Glenda the Good <gle...@medlib.ornam.wvnvm.com> wrote in article
><34d50ce1...@wvnvm.wvnet.edu>...
>> r...@rahul.net (Red) wrote:
>>
>> >doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
>> >
>> >> BTW I am not what you would call a "practicing Christian" and you have
>> >> helped me when you've said that Jews created Christianity. The first
>> >> Christians were Jews BUT is it not a hoot to watch the Pharisees go
>> >> berserk when the Bible writings are held up to their faces! I make it
>> >> my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote and when they go
>> >> squaking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews! That is my
>> >> method!
>> >
>> >The Bible, Koran and Talmud is a big load of superstitious crap that
>> >isn't close to being factual; it doesn't even make good fiction.
>> >
>> >Christians, Jews and Islamists are ALL superstitious assholes, but Jews
>> >are by far the stupidest, and have contributed the least to the world
>> >by their fudge-packin superstitious cults.
>> >
>> Lil 'ol Red. Hmmm. You appear to be, much like that idiot "tavish" a
>> simple clueless dolt. And I do mean clueless.
>>
>> The problem is, it's such a pity. I honestly and sincerely pray for
>> you.
>>
>> Glenda, the Good
>
>notice when you two were at the Motel 6 last December.
Ahh, yes, the Motel 6! That's where you and Tavish go to play "warden and the
escaped convict!" Or is that "Bruno the Rapist and the new prisoner?" Or maybe
"motorcycle gang initiation?"
>Just because he had
>a weenie whack before he was 6 months old and had no choice doesn't mean
>he's a Jew! I have to protect my cousin from defamation by bigoted Jewry.
No, no, it's all a mistake. Tavish doesn't have a "weenie whack." Three
centimeters is his natural length.
Graeme Bacque
John Winslow Brown <bro...@DELETEME.hotmailed.com> wrote in article
<01bd3348$25f1afe0$1279f1cd@msn-net>...
> Gregory, you are rather pathetic with your name calling and personal
> attacks but these attacks will not get me to stop posting what I am
finding
> at all of those bigoted Jewish websites!
>
...and your anti-Semitism makes you look even more pathetic - give it a
rest, why don't you?
--
*******************
<gba...@arcos.org>
<http://web.arcos.org/gbacque>
(#2226799 on ICQ)
++Question and challenge *all* human 'authority'++
**************************************************
Lord Cyril Haversham McTavish
On Sat, 07 Feb 98 05:16:35 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
wrote:
>In article <34da4f4c....@news.phoenix.net>, doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
>>On Thu, 05 Feb 1998 14:13:40 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Doc Tavish wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:14:52 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >John Winslow Brown wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Red <r...@rahul.net> wrote in article <99229@!>...
>>>> >> > jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger) wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > > We don't want him!
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > You accept rape-murderers like Joel Rifkin, and you don't want peaceful
>>>> >> > intellectuals like Doc Tavish?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Remember Joseph is a descendent of those that cried to have Barrabas
>>>> >> released, who was also a murderer!
>>>> >Since Jesus himself was a Jew, as was his entire family (you must believe
>>>> >this if you believe what else you wrote) then your point (not the one under
>>>> >your hat) is moot.
{The key point Susie Q is that they weren't from what Jesus called the
"Children of the Devil" or those that, because of their arrogance and
pride, were haters of all of the rest of mankind! Do you perceive the
difference now?}
I, Tavish, had earlier remarked to Miss Susan:
>>>> Why do I get the distinct impression that you smell real nice and
>>>> have nice smooth legs that I would want to lay my head on?
Now I ask all warm blooded males: "Just what is so abnormal about
thinking a woman would smell nice and think she has nice legs to which
one would would to lay his head down on. If I am sick then take me out
behind the barn and put a cap in my ass BUT if I am normal then my
opposition has to be closeted or latent homosexuals. They are,
afterall, the ones that take issue with me liking women and their
charms.
>>>I guess so you could have something stupid to say in order to try to obfuscate
>>>the fact that I'm right in the above matter & that you cannot refute me?
I, Tavish, only wanted to see some beautiful (?) female legs:
>>Zenda before I bowl you over with my irrefutable answer you have to
>>ante up girl. We want you to post a picture of your long sensuous sexy
>>legs. Is this too much ta ask? This is being too vulgar is it? I'm not
>>demanding full frontal nudity.
A. G. Phillbin openly reveals his homosexual cravings and requests:
>Before Susan sends you any photos of her gams, would you please post some
>shots of your short, wrinkled male member? I know that's not asking for "too
>much." I'm not demanding that you show us just how wide your anus is.
I knew I was always correct about the lefties and their fixation on
our dicks. If I post a picture of it will you and your suck buddies
leave me alone? Jeffrey G. Brown is too bashful to ask for himself as
well as Gregory Taylor and Allan Matthews so I guess they put you up
to asking for the picture of the legendary "O." I also ASSume that
Phillbin and his gang of Sodomites also want to bugger me up the ol'
vent pipe because why else would he be interested in my poop shoot
(anus for Jeffrey G. Brown)? I guess your lips will be quivering in
anticipation won't they? I've always had you "AntiRacists" pegged as
fags and now I have definitive proof!
Thank you,
Tavish
Lord Cyril Haversham McTavish
On 7 Feb 1998 11:53:49 GMT, "Graeme Bacque" <gba...@arcos.org> wrote:
>John Winslow Brown <bro...@DELETEME.hotmailed.com> wrote in article
><01bd3348$25f1afe0$1279f1cd@msn-net>...
>> Gregory, you are rather pathetic with your name calling and personal
>> attacks but these attacks will not get me to stop posting what I am
>> finding at all of those bigoted Jewish websites!
>...and your anti-Semitism makes you look even more pathetic - give it a
>rest, why don't you?
When is truth ever anti-Semitic? When is it anti-Semitic when I have
posted the bigotry that Jews themselves write? I challenge you- show
us your geneology that substantially proves that you are a descendent
of Shem. If anything you're a Khazar and they are no semites. Your
anti-Semitism rebuke does not work on me because I am wise to this
sneaky ruse. Expect more hailstones to rain upon you in the days to
come!
Try, for a change, showing that the following isn't anti-Gentile:
http://www.kashrus.org/kosher/supervis.html
[ ... ]
.... Wine, more than any other food or drink, represents the holiness
and separateness of the Jewish people.
It is used for the sanctification of Shabbat and Yom Tovand at Jewish
simchot. In the Beit Hamikdash wine was poured upon the Altar together
with the sacrifice. However, since wine was and still is used in many
forms of idolatrous worship, it has a unique status in Jewish Law,
which places extra restrictions on the making and handling of wine.
This includes wine used for non ceremonial purposes.
The production and handling of kosher wine must be done exclusively by
Jews. Wine, grape juice, and all products containing wine or grape
juice must remain solely in Jewish hands during the manufacturing
process and also after the seal of the bottle has been opened.
We are not allowed to drink any wine or grape juice, or any drink
containing wine or grape juice, which has been touched by a non Jew
after the seal of the bottle has been opened.
[ ... ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All of the above applies to you if you are a Gentile! Click the link
and verify for yourself the bigotry of Jewry. All of the above is
their words NOT mine! I will keep posting this material from all the
sources that I find it to wake you all up! Tavish comment.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ ... ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Make an excuse for:
1) ".... Wine, more than any other food or drink, represents the
holiness and separateness of the Jewish people." Aren't non-Jews holy
or clean?
2) "The production and handling of kosher wine must be done
exclusively by Jews. Wine, grape juice, and all products containing
wine or grape juice must remain solely in Jewish hands during the
manufacturing process and also after the seal of the bottle has been
opened." Are non-Jews unclean? Is this why they can't touch the bottle
of wine after the seal is broken?
3) " We are not allowed to drink any wine or grape juice, or any drink
containing wine or grape juice, which has been touched by a non Jew
after the seal of the bottle has been opened." A repeat in general
from above. Why aren't Jews allowed to drink if the seal has been
broken and the wine is touched by a non-Jew?
4) " Non commercial bread and cake that is completely baked by an
individual non Jew is called pat akum and may not be eaten." I'm dying
to hear you explain this bigotry too! Can you imagine the outrage by
you if a web site had a something that said instead:
" Non commercial bread and cake that is completely baked by an
individual non-White is called pat akum and may not be eaten by a
white." ? You'd be screaming racist bigot at the top of your lungs!
5) "Certain foods which were completely cooked by a non Jew (disbud
akum) may not be eaten, even if the foods are kosher and are cooked in
kosher utensils." How about this? Care to explain?
Now stop with your anti-Semitism claim. Enough is enough of this
deception. Most people that claim to be Jews can't prove their lineage
and if Jews had difficult times in the days of the Prophet Ezra
(thousands of years ago) then what makes you think that they are Jews
now? A bunch of knavery indeed!
Tavish
BTW I noticed that you added "alt.society.mental-health" to the news
groups. This is good because it is possible that you can get some help
to see reality! TTFN
A. G. Phillbin
Nobody is taking issue with your supposedly liking "women and their charms."
The problem is your pathetic, misogynistic behavior towards any woman you have
a disagreement with. The fact is, Scotty, you don't like women and know
nothing of their charms, as witnessed by the unrefuted fact that you have only
"heard" what "vulvar genitalia" tastes like. (BTW, where did you learn the
phrase "vulvar genitalia?" Have you been jerking off over your junior high
school hygiene textbook again?) As far as your offer to take you out to the
barn and put a cap in your ass, no thanks. I don't swing that way, but if I
did, I know I could do a lot better than you, and I wouldn't even have to work
the fag bars -- any panhandler would do. No, I ask all warm-blooded males:
what is "normal" about Scotty's approach to members of the female sex?
>
>>>>I guess so you could have something stupid to say in order to try to
> obfuscate
>>>>the fact that I'm right in the above matter & that you cannot refute me?
>
>I, Tavish, only wanted to see some beautiful (?) female legs:
>>>Zenda before I bowl you over with my irrefutable answer you have to
>>>ante up girl. We want you to post a picture of your long sensuous sexy
>>>legs. Is this too much ta ask? This is being too vulgar is it? I'm not
>>>demanding full frontal nudity.
>
>A. G. Phillbin openly reveals his homosexual cravings and requests:
>>Before Susan sends you any photos of her gams, would you please post some
>>shots of your short, wrinkled male member? I know that's not asking for "too
>>much." I'm not demanding that you show us just how wide your anus is.
Scotty, boy, I hate to disappoint you, but your homosexual fantasies about me
driving down your Hershey highway are just that, fantasies. Maybe you
should ask John Winslow Brown, or Schiller, or any of the other jizz
swallowers you fantasize about to reciprocate "that lovin' feeling." Besides,
you've had so much tube laid in there that they call your anus the West Texas
Pipeline. Besides, after those West Texas steers had their way with you, there
is little left for an ordinary man!
>
>I knew I was always correct about the lefties and their fixation on
>our dicks. If I post a picture of it will you and your suck buddies
>leave me alone?
No, Scotty, I won't leave you alone (no matter how many pictures of that
pencil stub you call a penis you post) , if only because it obviously annoys
you to have sexual innuendos thrown in your face, just like you won't leave
Susan Cohen or Glenda the Good alone. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for
the gander, even if the "gander" in question is a virginal (at least where
women are concerned) adolescent.
> Jeffrey G. Brown is too bashful to ask for himself as
>well as Gregory Taylor and Allan Matthews so I guess they put you up
>to asking for the picture of the legendary "O." I also ASSume that
>Phillbin and his gang of Sodomites also want to bugger me up the ol'
>vent pipe because why else would he be interested in my poop shoot
>(anus for Jeffrey G. Brown)? I guess your lips will be quivering in
>anticipation won't they? I've always had you "AntiRacists" pegged as
>fags and now I have definitive proof!
For someone who doesn't want anyone to be interested in his "poop shoot," you
certainly seem to make every effort to show off what an asshole you are.
>
> Thank you,
> Tavish
>
Susan Cohen
John Winslow Brown wrote:
> Gregory, you are rather pathetic with your name calling and personal
> attacks
The way you are with stuff like:
Glenda, you know that Tavish is circumsized because you couldn't help but
notice when you two were at the Motel 6 last December. Just because he had
a weenie whack before he was 6 months old and had no choice doesn't mean
he's a Jew! I have to protect my cousin from defamation by bigoted Jewry.
Sir John Winslow Brown
Doc Tavish
On Sun, 08 Feb 98 20:21:57 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
wrote:
>In article <34dcd8df....@news.flash.net>, doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
>>On Sat, 07 Feb 98 05:16:35 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
>>wrote:
>>>In article <34da4f4c....@news.phoenix.net>,
>> doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
[ ... ]
>>I, Tavish, had earlier remarked to Miss Susan:
>>>>>> Why do I get the distinct impression that you smell real nice and
>>>>>> have nice smooth legs that I would want to lay my head on?
Tavish again said:
>>Now I ask all warm blooded males: "Just what is so abnormal about
>>thinking a woman would smell nice and think she has nice legs to which
>>one would would to lay his head down on. If I am sick then take me out
>>behind the barn and put a cap in my ass BUT if I am normal then my
>>opposition has to be closeted or latent homosexuals. They are,
>>afterall, the ones that take issue with me liking women and their
>>charms.
A.G. Phillbin says:
>Nobody is taking issue with your supposedly liking "women and their charms."
>The problem is your pathetic, misogynistic behavior towards any woman you have
>a disagreement with. The fact is, Scotty, you don't like women and know
>nothing of their charms, as witnessed by the unrefuted fact that you have only
>"heard" what "vulvar genitalia" tastes like. (BTW, where did you learn the
>phrase "vulvar genitalia?" Have you been jerking off over your junior high
>school hygiene textbook again?)
Let's see if I get this straight; you are taking issue that I, a male,
made remarks at one time about having oral sex with a woman. And you
take issue that I commented on its taste.
You on the other hand are a male, and you made remarks about another
woman having oral sex with a man and you inquired as to what the penis
tasted like and if the woman swallowed the "juice" so to speak. You
come across as a homosexual. Here is your post with your question
asking what a penis tasted like:
http://x4.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=319013572&CONTEXT=886990044.363397455&hitnum=0
Subject: Re: I know the president's cock ...
From: agfi...@wenet.net (A. G. Phillbin)
Date: 1998/01/25
Message-ID: <6aeme2$l50$1...@was.hooked.net>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian
In article <34C20A...@eronet.com>, . wrote:
>Yeah, I had seen HIS prick.
>It looks like an short banana with an rotten prune on the top !
>Beneath this thing there are a pair of dark brown wrinkled balls ...
>Believe it or not ... That's it !
>
>Stand by me, please !
>Paula
Can you tell us how it tasted, Paula? Did you swallow?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A.G. not only are you interested in what a penis tastes like you
actually wanted me to post a picture of mine! Here is the proof:
From DejaNews archives:
http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=322838283&CONTEXT=886989129.478478390&hitnum=1
Subject: SCOTTY'S LAST DATE HAD FOUR STOMACHS! (was Re: Doc
Tavish Is A Jew)
From: agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
Date: 1998/02/07
Message-ID: <6bgqor$13o$2...@was.hooked.net>
In article <34da4f4c....@news.phoenix.net>,
doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
>On Thu, 05 Feb 1998 14:13:40 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Doc Tavish wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 02:14:52 -0500, Susan Cohen <ze...@smart.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >John Winslow Brown wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Red <r...@rahul.net> wrote in article <99229@!>...
>>> >> > jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger) wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > We don't want him!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > You accept rape-murderers like Joel Rifkin, and you don't want peaceful
>>> >> > intellectuals like Doc Tavish?
>>> >>
>>> >> Remember Joseph is a descendent of those that cried to have Barrabas
>>> >> released, who was also a murderer!
>>>
>>> >Since Jesus himself was a Jew, as was his entire family (you must believe
>>> >this if you believe what else you wrote) then your point (not the one under
>>> >your hat) is moot.
>>>
>>> Why do I get the distinct impression that you smell real nice and nice
>>> smooth legs that I would want to lay my head on?
>>I guess so you could have something stupid to say in order to try to obfuscate
>>the fact that I'm right in the above matter & that you cannot refute me?
>
>Zenda before I bowl you over with my irrefutable answer you have to
>ante up girl. We want you to post a picture of your long sensuous sexy
>legs. Is this too much ta ask? This is being to vulgar is it? I'm not
>demanding full frontal nudity.
A.G. Phillbin did say as archived at DejaNews:
Before Susan sends you any photos of her gams, would you please post
some shots of your short, wrinkled male member? I know that's not
asking for "too much." I'm not demanding that you show us just how
wide your anus is.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A.G. first wants to know what a penis tastes like, then he wants to
know if the semen was ingested and now he wants a picture of my penis
and then then comments on my anus! If A.G. Phillbin is NOT a
homosexual then he is definitely inclined in the direction of being
one. Remember that Jeffrey G. Brown likes and admires A.G. Phillbin.
Here is Jeffrey admiring a man that writes "dittys" about another man:
DejaNews archives:
http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=323017596&CONTEXT=886989683.479789152&hitnum=0
Subject: Re: Poor ol' gutless Scottie and his Messiah complex
From: jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
Date: 1998/02/07
Message-ID: <jeff_brown-ya024080...@news.zippo.com>
In article <6bi2c8$t20$1...@was.hooked.net>, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G.
Phillbin) wrote:
> There's an old ditty I learned as a kid in summer camp. It goes like this
> (imagine bagpipes in the background):
>
> Hey, McTavish is dead and his brother don't know it,
> His brother is dead and McTavish don't know it,
> Both of them died in the very same bed,
> And neither one knows that the other is dead.
>
> Well, here is the new a.p.w-p version, dedicated to Scott "who am I today"
> Bradbury:
>
> Hey, Doc Tavish is Scott and John Winslow don't know it,
> John Winslow is Scott and G. Schiller don't know it,
> All of them stand in the very same spot,
> And none of them knows that the others are Scott.
That's absolute brilliance, Mr. Phillbin. That should be somebody's
sig in this newsgroup.
JGB
===================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
"What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Back to A.G. Phillbin "Acting Up" after he outs himself!
A.G. Phillbin again:
>As far as your offer to take you out to the barn and put a cap in your ass, no thanks.
The term "put a cap in your ass" is Gangsta for shooting soemone and
has nothing to do with a sexual act. The inference being if I'm that
bad then take me behind the barn and shoot me! You are ignorant of pop
culture aren't you?
>I don't swing that way, but if I
>did, I know I could do a lot better than you, and I wouldn't even have to work
>the fag bars -- any panhandler would do. No, I ask all warm-blooded males:
>what is "normal" about Scotty's approach to members of the female sex?
What is normal about you? I only asked a female to post a picture of
her legs and you ask a male to post a picture of his penis! I notice
that you also call me "Scotty" when that is not my name!
Susan Cohen had earlier said:
>>>>>I guess so you could have something stupid to say in order to try to
>> obfuscate
>>>>>the fact that I'm right in the above matter & that you cannot refute me?
>>I, Tavish, only wanted to see some beautiful (?) female legs:
>>>>Zenda before I bowl you over with my irrefutable answer you have to
>>>>ante up girl. We want you to post a picture of your long sensuous sexy
>>>>legs. Is this too much ta ask? This is being too vulgar is it? I'm not
>>>>demanding full frontal nudity.
The line below is what A.G. Phillbin is upset about. Hell, he said it
not me. I can't help the fact that he is so ignorant that he "outs"
himself in tripping over his own feet to insult me. What normal male,
other than a homosexual, would request to see a picture of another
man's penis and then make a comment about the same person's anus?
Remember that Jeffrey G. Brown admires A.G. Phillbin.
>>A. G. Phillbin openly reveals his homosexual cravings and requests:
>>>Before Susan sends you any photos of her gams, would you please post some
>>>shots of your short, wrinkled male member? I know that's not asking for "too
>>>much." I'm not demanding that you show us just how wide your anus is.
>Scotty, boy, I hate to disappoint you, but your homosexual fantasies about me
>driving down your Hershey highway are just that, fantasies.
I don't have homosexual fantasies A.G. and that is the problem. You
are trying to transfer your warped and perverted mental attitudes on
me. Remember I talked about having oral sex with women and I wanted to
see women's legs. You on the other hand are the one that posts
questions asking what a penis tastes like and then made a request to
have a penis picture posted. You need counseling A.G.
Lurkers: Just look at his remaining spew and see if you see any
correlation between A.G.'s Act Up rants and me wanting to see a girl's
legs. Remember A.G. Phillbin wrote a ditty he dedicated to me, he
calls me "Scotty", he wants me to post a picture of my penis, he
wanted to know what a penis tasted like and A.G. is admired by Jeffrey
G. Brown!
>Maybe you
>should ask John Winslow Brown, or Schiller, or any of the other jizz
>swallowers you fantasize about to reciprocate "that lovin' feeling."
There you go back to mentioning "jizz swallowers" just as you made
mention when you allegedly ask Paula Jones concerning Bill Clinton
this: "Can you tell us how it tasted, Paula? Did you swallow?" (In the
post included above titled: " Re: I know the president's cock ...")
>Besides,
>you've had so much tube laid in there that they call your anus the West Texas
>Pipeline. Besides, after those West Texas steers had their way with you, there
>is little left for an ordinary man!
See what I mean folks! Remember A.G. Phillbin and Jeffrey G. Brown are
friends. Did you know that Jeffrey G. Brown has tried to defend A.G.
Phillbin? I'll show Jeffrey's warped defense of another warped person
below! Stay tuned!
>>I knew I was always correct about the lefties and their fixation on
>>our dicks. If I post a picture of it will you and your suck buddies
>>leave me alone?
>No, Scotty, I won't leave you alone (no matter how many pictures of that
>pencil stub you call a penis you post)
I haven't posted it BUT you have requested it or has your diseased
mind already forgot?
>, if only because it obviously annoys
>you to have sexual innuendos thrown in your face, just like you won't leave
>Susan Cohen or Glenda the Good alone.
They are the ones that follow me around just as you, Jeffrey, Allan
and Gregory do in vain attempts to smear and discredit me.
>What's sauce for the goose is sauce for
>the gander, even if the "gander" in question is a virginal (at least where
>women are concerned) adolescent.
>> Jeffrey G. Brown is too bashful to ask for himself as
>>well as Gregory Taylor and Allan Matthews so I guess they put you up
>>to asking for the picture of the legendary "O." I also ASSume that
>>Phillbin and his gang of Sodomites also want to bugger me up the ol'
>>vent pipe because why else would he be interested in my poop shoot
>>(anus for Jeffrey G. Brown)? I guess your lips will be quivering in
>>anticipation won't they? I've always had you "AntiRacists" pegged as
>>fags and now I have definitive proof!
>For someone who doesn't want anyone to be interested in his "poop shoot," you
>certainly seem to make every effort to show off what an asshole you are.
Like a true lefty your last lines are just a personal attack and
insult.
>> Thank you,
>> Tavish
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is Jeffrey G. Brown's vain attempt to defend A.G. Phillbin and
his attempt to make me look like a homosexual. Jeffrey combines his
two styles in this one post. He not only snips out all of the major
portion of the text but what is left is out of context snippets
refuted with out of context snippets from my earlier postings. You
will appreciate seeing how his warped mind maniacally tries to
fabricate something from various incongruent pieces. I will supply the
full text at the end so the lurker can compare what I actually said to
what Jeffrey engineered me to "say."
Here is Jeffrey uncut and remember that Jeffrey G. Brown and A.G.
Phillbin are friends!
Archived at DejaNews:
http://x4.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=323069666&CONTEXT=887064822.2084896872&hitnum=0
From: jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
Subject: Must Read! Solid Proof, in His Own Words and By His Own
Standards, That Scott Bradbury Has Homosexual Desires and Interests!
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 23:11:33 -0500
In article <34dcd8df....@news.flash.net>, Scott "I said it and I
meant it!" Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net)
wrote:
> dick...
"If you use speech that homosexuals use then what other
conclusion may be drawn?"
-- Subject: Re: Why is John Brown homophobic?
-- From: Scott Bradbury
-- Date: 1997/11/25
-- Message-ID:
<01bcf9fe$8c3f4f60$ba871ed1@msn-net>
> suck buddies...
"It looks rather homosexual to me!"
-- From: Scott Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net)
-- Subject: Two Thanksgiving Gobblers! (was Re:
The Rosenblatt forgeries continue)
-- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:29:21 GMT
-- Message-ID:
<347445fc....@news.phoenix.net>
-- NNTP-Posting-Host: dial30.phoenix.net
> the legendary "O."
"If you use speech that homosexuals use then what other
conclusion may be drawn?"
-- Subject: Re: Why is John Brown homophobic?
-- From: Scott Bradbury
-- Date: 1997/11/25
-- Message-ID:
<01bcf9fe$8c3f4f60$ba871ed1@msn-net>
> I also ASSume...
"It looks rather homosexual to me!"
-- From: Scott Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net)
-- Subject: Two Thanksgiving Gobblers! (was Re:
The Rosenblatt forgeries continue)
-- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:29:21 GMT
-- Message-ID:
<347445fc....@news.phoenix.net>
-- NNTP-Posting-Host: dial30.phoenix.net
> bugger me up the ol' vent pipe...
"If you use speech that homosexuals use then what other
conclusion may be drawn?"
-- Subject: Re: Why is John Brown homophobic?
-- From: Scott Bradbury
-- Date: 1997/11/25
-- Message-ID:
<01bcf9fe$8c3f4f60$ba871ed1@msn-net>
> poop shoot...
"It looks rather homosexual to me!"
-- From: Scott Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net)
-- Subject: Two Thanksgiving Gobblers! (was Re:
The Rosenblatt forgeries continue)
-- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:29:21 GMT
-- Message-ID:
<347445fc....@news.phoenix.net>
-- NNTP-Posting-Host: dial30.phoenix.net
JGB
=====================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
"What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ END ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The above post is unaltered and here are the snippets that Jeffrey
builds his case on: " dick... suck buddies... the legendary "O.".. I
also ASSume... bugger me up the ol' vent pipe... poop shoot..."
All of the above snipped from a reply to a person who is Jeffrey G.
Brown's ally and had requested a picture of my penis! Jeffrey won't do
this to A.G. Phillbin because "birds of a feather flock together."
Review of what A.G. said and my reply in its proper context:
http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=323006670&CONTEXT=887065312.796393632&hitnum=1
Subject: Must Read! Solid Proof, in Their Own Words, That
Anti-Racists Have Homosexual Desires and Interests! (was Re: Doc
Tavish Is A Jew)
From: doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com (Lord Cyril Haversham McTavish)
Date: 1998/02/07
On Sat, 07 Feb 98 05:16:35 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
wrote:
>In article <34da4f4c....@news.phoenix.net>,
>doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
[ ... ]
I, Tavish, only wanted to see some beautiful (?) female legs:
>>Zenda before I bowl you over with my irrefutable answer you have to
>>ante up girl. We want you to post a picture of your long sensuous sexy
>>legs. Is this too much ta ask? This is being too vulgar is it? I'm not
>>demanding full frontal nudity.
A. G. Phillbin openly reveals his homosexual cravings and requests:
>Before Susan sends you any photos of her gams, would you please post some
>shots of your short, wrinkled male member? I know that's not asking for "too
>much." I'm not demanding that you show us just how wide your anus is.
I knew I was always correct about the lefties and their fixation on
our dicks. If I post a picture of it will you and your suck buddies
leave me alone? Jeffrey G. Brown is too bashful to ask for himself as
well as Gregory Taylor and Allan Matthews so I guess they put you up
to asking for the picture of the legendary "O." I also ASSume that
Phillbin and his gang of Sodomites also want to bugger me up the ol'
vent pipe because why else would he be interested in my poop shoot
(anus for Jeffrey G. Brown)? I guess your lips will be quivering in
anticipation won't they? I've always had you "AntiRacists" pegged as
fags and now I have definitive proof!
Thank you,
Tavish
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Does the full context of what I posted bear any resembalnce at all to
the bastardized version that Jeffrey G. Brown posted in his desires to
defend his "friend" A.G. Phillbin?
Rather than post the full text of the out of context snippets Jeffrey
used for his out of context version of what I posted I'll provide the
clickable links so the lurker may click to see what I had actually
said, all in the name of truth of course. I will show the statement in
its proper context!
http://x2.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=292648947&CONTEXT=887065888.596377760&hitnum=5
"If you use speech that homosexuals use then what other
conclusion may be drawn?"
-- Subject: Re: Why is John Brown homophobic?
-- From: Scott Bradbury
-- Date: 1997/11/25
-- Message-ID:
<01bcf9fe$8c3f4f60$ba871ed1@msn-net>
I said the above to Jeffrey G. Brown in context:
Jeffrey G. Brown <jeff_...@bigfoot.com> wrote in article
<jeff_brown-ya024080...@news.zippo.com>...
> In article <01bcf93c$66253640$b9431ed1@msn-net>, Scott "I'm not Scott
> Bradbury!" Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
[I said both portions of text. Tavish]
> > As for me being gay; you're full of it. I'm not the one running around
> > calling other grown men names such as "Bobbykins" or "Scottie."
^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^
Homosexuals use such "pet" names as these that you use!
If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck
then it is a duck. If you use speech that homosexuals use then what
other conclusion may be drawn?
{A proper reply to a mentally disturbed pervert that refers to other
men with names as Jeffrey G. Brown does! Tavish 2/9/98}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It looks rather homosexual to me!"
-- From: Scott Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net)
-- Subject: Two Thanksgiving Gobblers! (was Re:
The Rosenblatt forgeries continue)
-- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:29:21 GMT
Message-ID: <347445fc....@news.phoenix.net>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Can't find the post above in DejaNews but I found this post from the
same date and notice the topic!
http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=291072341&CONTEXT=887067002.878968835&hitnum=17
Subject: Jeffrey's Delusions #2 (was Re: More assertions for
Bobbykins to run away from...)
From: doc_t...@nospam.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish)
Date: 1997/11/20
Message-ID: <3474b557....@news.phoenix.net>
On 20 Nov 1997 20:03:18 GMT, flei...@nospam.mailers.com (David
Fleissman) wrote:
>In article <jeff_brown-ya024080...@news.zippo.com>,
>jeff_...@bigfoot.com says...
>>In article <64uv7d$72e$9...@smarti2.smartworld.net>, Scott "I'm not Scott
>>Bradbury!" Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
How many different places have you seen Bradbury?
>>> I want anyone to rationally prove that this is not
>>> a homosexual using a name such as Bobbykins.
>>Let's see... Bradbury has demonstrated:
>You haven't proven that your calling Whitaker "Bobbykins" isn't homosexual.
He sure hasn't and going by his standards this must mean that he is
lying!
>You directly dodge the issue. This is just a simple point that could be ironed out if you
>would only be truthful about your intents. Why do you call him "Bobbykins" which
>is a homosexual type of pet name? Why do you keep ducking this issue! This
>speaks volumes of you as a person too!
>> - a complete lack of any courage in his convictions;
>> - the utter inability to take responsibility for his own words;
>> - the use of forged posts to smear those who disagree with him; and,
>> - the consistent use of sexual innuendo in place of actual argument.
No body needs to prove anything to you Jeffrey because you are
irrelevant!
>Nobody has to smear you psycho; you do this deed grandly all on your own.
>>How is it that he is entitled to demand anything -- especially rationality
>>-- from anyone?
>>> [...deletia...]
>>> I declare to all: Jeffrey G. Brown is a self denying
>>> closeted homosexual and this is why he is so vicious
>>> because of his misery. Out yourself Jeffrey and stop
>>> living lies like a peter puffing coward!
>>... says Big Brave Bradbury from behind yet another of his forged user IDs.
>Well, I'm not Bradbury and I say that what he said has considerable merit to it!
I'm the one that he calls Bradbury but I go along with what was said
above about Jeffrey being vicious, self denying and closeted....
>>
>> "Name calling only makes you look like a chronic boob to
>> those who know better!"
>
>Like you calling Whitaker "Bobbykins" all the time as well as calling Bradbury
>"Scottie"; all very reminiscent of a homosexual personality!
Well said. I guess making up little names like "Bobbykins" isn't done
with the intenet of demeaning someone's name! Jeffrey would never do
that because he is a perfect Politically Correct Liberal.
>> -- From: Scott Bradbury <tav...@phoenix.net>
>> -- Subject: Statistically Speaking: Tavish is Still
>> Correct as Always & Only People W/O Answers
>> Name Call!
>> -- Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 20:26:12 -0600
>> -- Message-ID: <32F54C...@phoenix.net>
I see that Brown still has to resort to the ol' cut-and-paste trick.
>>> We know that you want to give us blow but I would whack
>>> you across your skull with a baseball bat if you were
>>> to ever approach me with your vibrasonic lips!
I would have said quivering lips instead of vibrasonic. Vibrasonic
sounds mechanical.
>> "False accusations and personal insults shows how desperate you are."
>
>That didn't look like a false accusation to me. It looked like a statement of policy
>or consequences. You should try to do better if you are just going to
>cut-and-paste; which makes you look like a terrorist or something. Don't you have
>any ideas of your own or are you that big of a cretin that you have to be a parrot
>and belch other's words?
>> -- From: Scott Bradbury
>> -- Subject: Ken Barnes Lies!
>> -- Date: 1997/06/09
>> -- Message-Id: <339CAD...@spam.not.net>
>>
>>JGB
>
>Are you a warped homosexual stalker? It sure looks like you keep files on people
>too! This is a rather unhealthy devotion that you have.
I think that Jeffrey is a sick and pathetic stalker myself. I had to
report him to his ISP because he kept e-mailing me against my wishes.
He does not respect other people's rights at all.
Doc Tavish (A victim of Jeffrey The Stalker for 9 months!)
>>Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
One only needs to check DejaNews to see the legions of posts in which
Jeffrey G. Broiwn has used " Poor ol' gutless Scottie ..." in the
title to see that he has a fixated and warped mind.
Doc Tavish
BTW Never forget that Jeffrey G. Brown and A.G. Phillbin are allies
and friends. "Birds of a feather flock together."
Doc Tavish
On Sat, 07 Feb 98 05:49:32 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
wrote:
>In article <01bd32e8$06831fa0$1279f1cd@msn-net>, "John Winslow Brown" <bro...@DELETEME.hotmailed.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Glenda the Good <gle...@medlib.ornam.wvnvm.com> wrote in article
>><34d50ce1...@wvnvm.wvnet.edu>...
>>> r...@rahul.net (Red) wrote:
>>>
>>> >doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> BTW I am not what you would call a "practicing Christian" and you have
>>> >> helped me when you've said that Jews created Christianity. The first
>>> >> Christians were Jews BUT is it not a hoot to watch the Pharisees go
>>> >> berserk when the Bible writings are held up to their faces! I make it
>>> >> my policy to mainly use what Jews themselves wrote and when they go
>>> >> squaking I tell them to complain to their fellow Jews! That is my
>>> >> method!
Red said:
>>> >The Bible, Koran and Talmud is a big load of superstitious crap that
>>> >isn't close to being factual; it doesn't even make good fiction.
>>> >
>>> >Christians, Jews and Islamists are ALL superstitious assholes, but Jews
>>> >are by far the stupidest, and have contributed the least to the world
>>> >by their fudge-packin superstitious cults.
>>> >
Glenda now speaking:
>>> Lil 'ol Red. Hmmm. You appear to be, much like that idiot "tavish" a
>>> simple clueless dolt. And I do mean clueless.
>>>
>>> The problem is, it's such a pity. I honestly and sincerely pray for
>>> you.
>>>
>>> Glenda, the Good
J.W.B. spoke
>>Glenda, you know that Tavish is circumsized because you couldn't help but
>>notice when you two were at the Motel 6 last December.
A.G. Phillbin seeks to slander:
>Ahh, yes, the Motel 6! That's where you and Tavish go to play "warden and the
>escaped convict!" Or is that "Bruno the Rapist and the new prisoner?" Or maybe
>"motorcycle gang initiation?"
J.W.B. spoke
>>Just because he had
>>a weenie whack before he was 6 months old and had no choice doesn't mean
>>he's a Jew! I have to protect my cousin from defamation by bigoted Jewry.
A.G. Philllbin has his mind on my penis again:
>No, no, it's all a mistake. Tavish doesn't have a "weenie whack." Three
>centimeters is his natural length.
Phillbin just can't keep my penis off his mind. Rememeber that A.G.
Phillbin and Jeffrey G. Brown are friends!
mad...@uscom.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Roger Alexander <rla...@worldnet.att.net> wrote: supporting criminal
that sent death threats to JEWS since he wishes HERR DOC TAVISH had
carried out the threats.
>
>
>Avital Pilpel wrote:
>
>> Matt Giwer wrote:
>>
>> > I got mine. It even has a cyanide capsule if ever
>captured by
>> > the
>> > ADL.
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
>>
>> Hey, Matt! I told the ADL where you live!
>>
>> Better take that capsule NOW, before it's too late!
>
> Mildly stupid post. Lukewarm. Not worth the bother.
>RLA
*************************************************
* This message has been signed with the support *
* of an unregistered copy of PGPeep (tm), the *
* Forte (Free) Agent <-> PGP 5.0 interface. *
* *
* Details: http://www.poboxes.com/pgpeep/ *
*************************************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQBVAwUBNN5iAA2NH8urM3q5AQH64AIA2MUBS3DtC/XQqr18AoPraG3AmflS/6hv
sJ9iiazn/I54TnlykNknLVupF5D2i9Kwi6aPlvJhXs2dgvnczjWsow==
=wVRj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
madayn
Dr. Phlegming
Doc Tavish wrote in message <34dfb419....@news.phoenix.net>...
A. G. Phillbin
Another example of Scotty's childish sexual baiting. When he decides he can't
argue with a woman, it soothes his little ego (which goes with his little
"manhood") to imagine himself degrading her in bed. And I am sure it is a
degradation fantasy, since you can't deal with a woman as a person.
>
>A.G. Phillbin seeks to slander:
>>Ahh, yes, the Motel 6! That's where you and Tavish go to play "warden and the
>>escaped convict!" Or is that "Bruno the Rapist and the new prisoner?" Or maybe
>
>>"motorcycle gang initiation?"
A.G. Phillbin responds in kind. That really bothers you, doesn't it, Scotty?
>
>J.W.B. spoke
>>>Just because he had
>>>a weenie whack before he was 6 months old and had no choice doesn't mean
>>>he's a Jew! I have to protect my cousin from defamation by bigoted Jewry.
>
>A.G. Philllbin has his mind on my penis again:
>>No, no, it's all a mistake. Tavish doesn't have a "weenie whack." Three
>>centimeters is his natural length.
Continuation of the above response in kind.
>
>Phillbin just can't keep my penis off his mind.
Actually, I was thinking about your mind (and it's limited content), but
confused it with your penis. Sorry for the error.
> Rememeber that A.G.
>Phillbin and Jeffrey G. Brown are friends!
>
Remember that Scotty has to make up people because he has no friends.
Soctty, please help me clear up something:
Is it that you, John Winslow Brown, Doc Tavish, G. Schiller, and a few others
possess the same penis?
Or is it that all of you get together at the Motel 6 to share someone else's
penis?
Just wondering.
Doc Tavish
On Tue, 10 Feb 98 20:46:30 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
wrote:
>In article <34dfb419....@news.phoenix.net>, doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
>>On Sat, 07 Feb 98 05:49:32 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
>>wrote:
>>A.G. Philllbin has his mind on my penis again:
>>>No, no, it's all a mistake. Tavish doesn't have a "weenie whack." Three
>>>centimeters is his natural length.
>Continuation of the above response in kind.
>>Phillbin just can't keep my penis off his mind.
A.G. Phillbin now writes:
>Actually, I was thinking about your mind (and it's limited content), but
>confused it with your penis. Sorry for the error.
Error my eye; you made another Freudian slip and admited that you
still think of my penis! We know what you are A.G. so stop being a
gutless coward and now go ahead "out" yourself and while you're at it
persuade Jeffrey to "out" himself as well.
Remember this lurkers Jeffrey G. Brown admires A.G. Phillbin!
Here is more of A.G. expressing what is on his mind:
http://x4.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=319013572&CONTEXT=886990044.363397455&hitnum=0
Subject: Re: I know the president's cock ...
From: agfi...@wenet.net (A. G. Phillbin)
Date: 1998/01/25
Message-ID: <6aeme2$l50$1...@was.hooked.net>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian
In article <34C20A...@eronet.com>, . wrote:
>Yeah, I had seen HIS prick.
>It looks like an short banana with an rotten prune on the top !
>Beneath this thing there are a pair of dark brown wrinkled balls ...
>Believe it or not ... That's it !
>
>Stand by me, please !
>Paula
Can you tell us how it tasted, Paula? Did you swallow?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From DejaNews archives:
http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=322838283&CONTEXT=886989129.478478390&hitnum=1
Subject: SCOTTY'S LAST DATE HAD FOUR STOMACHS! (was Re: Doc
Tavish Is A Jew)
From: agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
Date: 1998/02/07
Message-ID: <6bgqor$13o$2...@was.hooked.net>
In article <34da4f4c....@news.phoenix.net>,
doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
[ ... ]
>Zenda before I bowl you over with my irrefutable answer you have to
>ante up girl. We want you to post a picture of your long sensuous sexy
>legs. Is this too much ta ask? This is being to vulgar is it? I'm not
>demanding full frontal nudity.
A.G. Phillbin did say as archived at DejaNews:
Before Susan sends you any photos of her gams, would you please post
some shots of your short, wrinkled male member? I know that's not
asking for "too much." I'm not demanding that you show us just how
wide your anus is.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Remember lurkers A. G. Phillbin and Jeffrey G. Brown are friends!
rla...@worldnet.att.net
Mark can't evven read and comprehend. I havve no use for Tavish whatever.
I consider him as embarrassing to me as Mark ought to be to upstanding
Jews. One or two of them have advised Mark not to post, so both of you
are unwelcome, though no one will keep either of you from posting.
RLA
mad...@uscom.com wrote in message <34e39fff...@news.uscom.com>...
Dr. Phlegming
I don't think so.
Don't be like Scotty, stay in school kids.
schier
I usually do not reply to such verbal vomit, except that I had to respond
to this header!!
I believe that Mr Tavish has neither mind nor penis, so that this header is
incorrect and inaccurate!!!
Yitzchak
Doc Tavish
On Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:26:33 -0800, "Dr. Phlegming" <em...@dweeb.com>
wrote:
Dr. Phlemglob, your subject tile of: "Tavish uses his penis as a mind
again" is only partially correct.
I remember my grandpappy Ebenezer Waldo McTavish telling me when I was
a younger lad the following wisdom: "Don't think with your dick and
don't screw with your mind." This was told to me during the 60s hippy
LUV and LSD culture with its tune in, turn on, drop out themes. It's
sound advice for all to follow today too!
May G-d bless my grandpa! I hear O Mein Grandpa playing in my mind now
as I type and the tears hit the keys. Got to go; I'm getting all
sentimental......
Doc Tavish
Original subject title posted under by Gregory Taylor was:
Re: SCOTTY, YOUR VIRGINITY IS SHOWING! (was Re: Doc Tavish Is A Jew)
On Mon, 09 Feb 1998 16:52:21 -0600, gta...@msn.fullfeed.com wrote:
>A. G. Phillbin wrote:
>> Why do I get the impression that you are a virginal adolescent who stammers
>> and stutters in the presence of any reasonably attracive female?
Gregory Taylor (uncut):
>You've probably been led astray by assuming that the concentration of
>fixations on oral sex and juvenile slobbering exists mainly in the
>virginal adolescent. While there may be some residual inarticulacy
>occasioned by his leaving school before his middle-school diploma, we are
>reliabily informed by Scott Bradbury that he's a portly man on the far
>side of forty. It is also quite likely that he's intimidated by the
>intelligence of any woman he doesn't rent or inflate (which would
>constitute most women), and regresses at the first sight of inadequacy.
>This would certainly square with his more general inability to take any
>personal responsibility for his views.
>
>Hope this helps.
It only helps people know that all you can do is name call and make
personal attacks as well. You still haven't summoned up the antsy to
answer these questions in an adult manner:
The above actually from the following:
http://www.kashrus.org/kosher/supervis.html
[ ... ]
.... Wine, more than any other food or drink, represents the holiness
and separateness of the Jewish people.
It is used for the sanctification of Shabbat and Yom Tovand at Jewish
simchot. In the Beit Hamikdash wine was poured upon the Altar together
with the sacrifice. However, since wine was and still is used in many
forms of idolatrous worship, it has a unique status in Jewish Law,
which places extra restrictions on the making and handling of wine.
This includes wine used for non ceremonial purposes.
The production and handling of kosher wine must be done exclusively by
Jews. Wine, grape juice, and all products containing wine or grape
juice must remain solely in Jewish hands during the manufacturing
process and also after the seal of the bottle has been opened.
We are not allowed to drink any wine or grape juice, or any drink
containing wine or grape juice, which has been touched by a non Jew
after the seal of the bottle has been opened.
[ ... ]
Grape Ingredients In Processed Foods: All liquids produced from fresh
[ ... ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anyone can do childish taunts as you do Gregory but it takes something
other than that to deal with the above. You avoid answering my posts
because their is no way that you can make excuses for what was said
not being bigoted. If what I posted is so much out of line then it
should be an easy slam dunk for a person with a "rapier wit[TM]" that
you've bragged about having. If what I have posted is so off then why
do you always delete it and go into your name call and smear mode?
Tavish
BTW you only make yourself look bad when you avoid the serious stuff.
Lurkers apply the Tavish maxim to what you have seen and you decide
who seks truth and who seeks to hide it! See for yourselves who
attacks the opposition persoanlly and who attacks the opposition's
premise.
The Tavish Maxim is:
"If I hear something being debated pertaining to a subject that I am
not cognizant of, therefore impartial, I examine the manner of the
debate and conduct. I know who is telling the truth and who is lying
by the tactics employed- the liar always attacks the opposing person
and the truth teller always attacks the opposing premise!"
- Doc Tavish -
BTW Gregory, I will be posting this post along with your reply to many
other news groups as well. If you want to carry on as you normally do
then it is fine by me because as I have said before you are hurting
yourself far more than you are hurting me!
(I'll be posting to more than you see above in other words. You will
become quite famous as a great debater!)
A. G. Phillbin
In article <34e0e610...@news.phoenix.net>, doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Feb 98 20:46:30 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
>wrote:
>
>>In article <34dfb419....@news.phoenix.net>,
> doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com wrote:
>>>On Sat, 07 Feb 98 05:49:32 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
>>>wrote:
>
>>>A.G. Philllbin has his mind on my penis again:
>>>>No, no, it's all a mistake. Tavish doesn't have a "weenie whack." Three
>>>>centimeters is his natural length.
>
>>Continuation of the above response in kind.
>
>>>Phillbin just can't keep my penis off his mind.
>
>A.G. Phillbin now writes:
>>Actually, I was thinking about your mind (and it's limited content), but
>>confused it with your penis. Sorry for the error.
>
>Error my eye; you made another Freudian slip and admited that you
>still think of my penis! We know what you are A.G. so stop being a
>gutless coward and now go ahead "out" yourself and while you're at it
>persuade Jeffrey to "out" himself as well.
Scotty, you really need to get a clue. I realize that being a seventh grade
dropout, your level of repartee is going to be fairly low, but most fourth
graders have long gotten past the "I know you are, but what am I" stage. Let
me give you a little help. Start by reciting, "I'm rubber, you're glue,
everything you say bounces off me and sticks to you!"
Now why don't you stop being an infantile moron and persuade yourself that
sexually insulting women who you can't argue with is a sign of mental
disorder. Then get some help.
Or don't, and stay on the usenet and continue to display the peurility of your
views as well as your personality.
>
>Remember this lurkers Jeffrey G. Brown admires A.G. Phillbin!
>
>Here is more of A.G. expressing what is on his mind:
>
>http://x4.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=319013572&CONTEXT=886990044.363397455&hitnu
>m=0
>
>Subject: Re: I know the president's cock ...
>From: agfi...@wenet.net (A. G. Phillbin)
>Date: 1998/01/25
>Message-ID: <6aeme2$l50$1...@was.hooked.net>
>Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian
>
>In article <34C20A...@eronet.com>, . wrote:
>>Yeah, I had seen HIS prick.
>>It looks like an short banana with an rotten prune on the top !
>>Beneath this thing there are a pair of dark brown wrinkled balls ...
>>Believe it or not ... That's it !
>>
>>Stand by me, please !
>>Paula
>
>Can you tell us how it tasted, Paula? Did you swallow?
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>From DejaNews archives:
>
>http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=322838283&CONTEXT=886989129.478478390&hitnu
>m=1
>
>Subject: SCOTTY'S LAST DATE HAD FOUR STOMACHS! (was Re: Doc
>Tavish Is A Jew)
ONEstar
I have found the Jews a distinct and holy people who were given such fine
laws in an effort to teach them the ways which emphasize how apart they are
from the creator. That intent has never changed in the eyes of the modern
Jew, however history paints the view from a perspective not often
entertained by that same modern Jew.
While I understand the laws and the tradition, I find that tradition merely
for traditions' sake, invalidates the law to the point the original intent
becomes unrecognizable.
ONE
Doc Tavish wrote in message <34e10963...@news.phoenix.net>...
mar...@juno.com
I am a bit mystified by this exchange, but anyway, here's my $.02:
In article <34e10963...@news.phoenix.net>,
Of course they are, or can be. Just not in the sense that is applied to
the Jewish people: "You shall be unto me a kingdom of priests and a holy
nation". What do *you* mean by "holy"?
> 2) "The production and handling of kosher wine must be done
> exclusively by Jews. Wine, grape juice, and all products containing
> wine or grape juice must remain solely in Jewish hands during the
> manufacturing process and also after the seal of the bottle has been
> opened."
>
> Are non-Jews unclean? Is this why they can't touch the bottle of wine
> after the seal is broken?
No. In fact, more kinds of ritual uncleanliness apply to Jews than to
non-Jews. Apparently this is the only reason for the above you can think
of. There *are* other reasons, though. Given that (as stated in the
article you excerpted from kashrus.org) wine was often used in non-Jewish
rituals, the rabbis imposed the restrictions on wine and other foods in
order to 1) prevent Jews from partaking at Gentile religious feasts; and
2) to prevent a situation where a Gentile cook might introduce something
non-kosher into the food that he knows Jews will eat out of spite.
> 3) " We are not allowed to drink any wine or grape juice, or any drink
> containing wine or grape juice, which has been touched by a non Jew
> after the seal of the bottle has been opened."
>
> A repeat in general from above. Why aren't Jews allowed to drink if
> the seal has been broken and the wine is touched by a non-Jew?
See above. Pausterised wine, of course, is "immune" from all such
disqualifications.
> 4) " Non commercial bread and cake that is completely baked by an
> individual non Jew is called pat akum and may not be eaten."
>
> I'm dying to hear you explain this bigotry too! Can you imagine the
> outrage by you if a web site had a something that said instead:
> "Non commercial bread and cake that is completely baked by an
> individual non-White is called pat akum and may not be eaten by a
> white." ? You'd be screaming racist bigot at the top of your lungs!
Don't know about Mr. Taylor; I wouldn't. If someone wants to impose some
such restriction on himself, I might consider him stupid (provided I knew
*all* his reasons and judged them to be invalid), but I wouldn't scream.
What for? Anyway, what is your definition of "bigot", I wonder? Here's
what Merriam-Webster says: Etymology: Middle French, hypocrite, bigot
Date: 1661 : a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her
own opinions and prejudices
If I remember correctly, Catholics don't let non-baptized people take the
Eucharist. Is this also bigotry? What is your problem with religious
practice?
Yisroel Markov Boston, MA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Live joyfully with the wife whom you love all the days of the life of
your vanity, which He has given you under the sun, all the days of
your vanity..." -- Ecclesiastes 8:9
mad...@uscom.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
"Dr. Phlegming" <em...@dweeb.com> wrote:
>
>Doc Tavish wrote in message <34dfb419....@news.phoenix.net>...
>>On Sat, 07 Feb 98 05:49:32 GMT, agfi...@hooked.net (A. G. Phillbin)
>>wrote:
>>
>>A.G. Phillbin seeks to slander:
>>>Ahh, yes, the Motel 6! That's where you and Tavish go to play
>"warden and
>the
>>>escaped convict!" Or is that "Bruno the Rapist and the new
>prisoner?" Or
>maybe
>>>"motorcycle gang initiation?"
>>
>>J.W.B. spoke
>>>>Just because he had
>>>>a weenie whack before he was 6 months old and had no choice
>doesn't mean
>>>>he's a Jew! I have to protect my cousin from defamation by
>bigoted Jewry.
>>
>>A.G. Philllbin has his mind on my penis again:
>>>No, no, it's all a mistake. Tavish doesn't have a "weenie whack."
>Three
>>>centimeters is his natural length.
>>
>>Phillbin just can't keep my penis off his mind. Rememeber that A.G.
>>Phillbin and Jeffrey G. Brown are friends!
>>
>
Herr Doc Tavish is a CRIMINAL WANTED FOR QUESTIONING BY THE FBI for
the DEATH THREATS HE SENT TO JEWS!!!
*************************************************
* This message has been signed with the support *
* of an unregistered copy of PGPeep (tm), the *
* Forte (Free) Agent <-> PGP 5.0 interface. *
* *
* Details: http://www.poboxes.com/pgpeep/ *
*************************************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQBVAwUBNOJdyQ2NH8urM3q5AQFdewIAqo2oQkIC7T03DATDW9Sm/15Ty3MTSUJB
Hoy656VUj9qUl2PCwERgopqmDAvmCRdQoFB2QTMjKD8YRMf0PEVGzg==
=TpFc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
madayn
Doc Tavish
Attention lurkers: Twice Gregory Taylor has used childish titles. I.E.
"Scott wonders what a real life would be like...."
"SCOTTY, YOUR VIRGINITY IS SHOWING! (was Re: Doc Tavish Is A Jew)"
But yet he won't answer five plain and simple questions!
......................................................................................
On Thu, 12 Feb 1998 07:51:58 -0600, gta...@msn.fullfeed.com wrote:
>Scott Bradbury's odiferous sock puppet doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com
>wrote:
Still making the personal attacks BUT NOT answering the serious
questions.
>>...You still haven't summoned up the antsy to
>> answer these questions in an adult manner:
Notice that Gregory only left two lines of my reply to his original
post. I have attached the post below so all may see his methods of
debate. I have not snipped one word from his posts.
>Scott, at the moment you're not worth the trouble;
What you are saying is that you can't answer the questions. Any
thinking person would know that you would make a dodge such as this. I
see that you have enough time to make a fictionalized account of your
public radio fantasy. I will attach the challenge I issued you just
below your typical run of the mill fancy foot work at avoiding the
serious matter at hand.
>I've got a bunch of
>new product announcements to design, a new ad campaign and direct mail
>program to keep an eye on, and some of the other perks that us folks who
>stayed in school and wound up with careers spend our time on (instead of
>importuning women who are your intellectual superiors, inventing fake
>persons to cover your own noted lack of fortitude, and trolling for naked
>pix from the safety of your trailer).
>
>Here's a quick hint: Your "proofs" don't contain the language of supposed
>gentiles' uncleanliness (you imputed that bit, moron). Moreover, you
>demonstrate a rather unsuprising lack of general understanding of what
>Kosher/Kashrut is in addition to the sort of idiocy which might be
>explicable by your relative lack of exposure to the range of pietistic
>behaviours through the world's religious practices. Finally, you've got
>the same basic problem with understanding the extent to which the stuff
>you quote reflects anything approaching authoritative descriptions of
>anyone other than the person who wrote it (that same "some X/all X"
>problem you just can't get past).
>
>In brief: You can't make sense of what you read. Your propositionalizing
>is faulty from the git-go, and you wouldn't recognize the construction of
>proper evidence and authority if it bit you in your fat arse.
>
>Now excuse me: I've got some web interfaces to a database to mess around
>with.
>
>Stay lame, dude. That last little whiny peek under your tinfoil helmet in
>re: Ms. Cohen (who really does think you're a pathetic yutz, by the way)
>was thrilling; I think that the diagnosis of infantilism and narcissism
>is spot on in your case.
~~~~~~~~ END ~~~~~~~~
Here is what Gregory Taylor won't answer because he can't answer in a
way that would not make him look bigoted. This was his post and my
reply:
Jeffrey G. Brown
In article <34df971e....@news.phoenix.net>, Scott "Here's the rope --
now to hang myself!" Bradbury (doc_t...@nonspam.bigfoot.com,
phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
> The above post is unaltered and here are the snippets that Jeffrey
> builds his case on: " dick... suck buddies... the legendary "O.".. I
> also ASSume... bugger me up the ol' vent pipe... poop shoot..."
Yup. And here's what poor ol' gutless Scottie himself had to say about the
use of these terms:
"If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck
then it is a duck. If you use speech that homosexuals use then what
other conclusion may be drawn?"
-- Subject: Re: Why is John Brown homophobic?
-- From: Scott Bradbury
-- Date: 1997/11/25
-- Message-ID: <01bcf9fe$8c3f4f60$ba871ed1@msn-net>
Case closed.