One Question Ken McVay Won't Answer About the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada
Tavish
which is funded (in part) through the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith
Canada---
Ken-- if the League for Human Rights is truly an agency safe guarding human
rights for everyone then why are they on record as giving financial support to a
known communist rabble rouser like David Lethbridge; "curator" of the Bethune
Institute?
IOW how can an organization claim they are fighting for "human rights" when they
support people who espouse an ideology (communism) which has the most abhorrent
record of all (and still does)?
I posted this recently and you have yet to make any comment:
(excerpted)
<<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. - FAIR USE INTENDED>>>
Links and contents verified January 29 ,2003
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 01:53:49 +0100,
<f9b229930886863b...@remailer.frell.eu.org>
FREED...@anon.lcs.mit.edu, O...@anon.lcs.mit.edu wrote:
[...]
>http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative affiliation with the
League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada. The League is a national
volunteer organization dedicated to combatting antisemitism, racism and bigotry,
and to promoting human rights for all Canadians.
Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER CARD for their donation may call
B'nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224, and advise the receptionist that they
wish to make a donation to the Nizkor Project; If you prefer, you can print this
form and send to:
The Nizkor Project
c/o
The League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada
15 Hove Street
Toronto, Ontario M3H 4Y8
Name:________________________________________
Street Address:________________________________________________
City_________________State/Province__________Postal Code_______
E-Mail Address:_________________________________
Amount Enclosed: $___________
Please make your donations payable to "The League for Human Rights of B'nai
Brith Canada," and add the words "Nizkor Trust Fund" to the cheque's memo
section...
Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt. [#0235903-43-13]
<END>
>B'nai Brith also issues "tax receipts" for donations made to
>communist David Lethbridge's web site as well.
>http://www.freedomsite.org/cafe/newsletters/1998/fsm_jan98.html
> "B'nai Brith Offers "Charitable" Receipts for Donations
> to Lethbridge The same unholy alliance -- Communist Party
> and League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith -- that was ranged
> against Canadian Association for Free Expression director Paul
> Fromm last year, now has coalesced behind communist instructor
> David Lethbridge who is being sued for libel by Salmon Arm
> publisher and patriotic activist Eileen Pressler. Last year,
> Lethbridge, who has struggled to deny us meeting venues by
> pressuring hotels in Western Canada, gave B'nai Brith material
> which it passed on to the Peel Board of Education to try to
> get Paul Fromm fired. Both Lethbridge and B'nai Brith claimed
> credit for getting the 23-year veteran English teacher dismissed
> for his political views. At Lethbridge's libel trial that took
> place in Victoria, November 10 to December 8 -- final summations
> are scheduled for March -- Pressler's lawyer Douglas Christie
> extracted from Lethbridge the admission that his defence was
> being bankrolled by the Communist Party of Canada.
>
> In a more sinister development, it appears that B'nai Brith is
> using its charitable status to raise funds for the communist
> agitator. Letter writer Ben Dayson stated in the Western Jewish
> Bulletin (December 26, 1997): "All funds raised ... for Dr.
> Lethbridge's defence, ... which I might add are badly needed,
> are being done under the auspices of B'nai Brith....
>
>Related link to the above rape of human rights at urging of
>B'nai Brith to a communist they supported;
>http://www.freedomsite.org/exposed/bnai_brith/fromm_letter.html
More info on David Lethbridge and his communist ties:
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e2357ab_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Communist Paul Kneisel Advocates a Revolution Against Capital and State
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:20:02 GMT
(EXCERPT)
[...]
Document Archives
Anti-fascist theory
http://www.anti-fascism.org/doc-af-prop.html
The above will take you to this (and others too):
Lethbridge, David (Bethune Institute for Anti-Fascist Studies) -- see also
Lethbridge writings in "tactics" archive
"Prescription For Fascism: Alternative Medicine and Right-Wing Politics, March
2001 http://www.anti-fascism.org/da/afp/lethbridge-perscription.html
http://bethuneinstitute.org/
This site is dedicated to the militant anti-fascist spirit of Dr. Norman
Bethune.
http://bethuneinstitute.org/index2.html
Once at the index click to read (left hand margin bottom):
BETHUNE:
"Dr. Norman Bethune was born in Gravenhurst, Ontario, in 1890...
After a visit to the Soviet Union, in 1935, he organized the Montreal
Group for the Security of the People's Health, the first organization in Canada
to fight for socialized medicine and universal free medical care. It was in that
same year he joined the Communist Party of Canada and dedicated himself to the
struggle against fascism...
In 1938, Bethune went to China to help Mao-Tse Tung's revolutionary army
defeat the Japanese imperialists... As a Communist, he fought against fascism
and won the gratitude of the working class of the whole world..." <END>
At the same index click to read (left hand margin bottom):
LINKS:
Political Parties
Communist Party of Canada (CPC)
Communist Party USA (CPUSA)
South African Communist Party(SACP)
Anti-fascist and Anti-racist Organizations
Arm the Spirit(ATS)
Anti-Racist Action (ARA)
Political Research Associates (PRA)
Anti-Fascism.org http://www.anti-fascism.org/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<<NOTE: ANTI-FASCISM.ORG is Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's web site.>>
[...]
"Let us have done, then, with the miserable deception of anti-communism. It has
served Hitler and Mussolini well, but not the enslaved German and Italian
people. It may have a pleasing sound in Tory ears, and salve the consciences of
some spinsterish British labor leaders, but it is rank dishonesty nevertheless."
Dr. Norman Bethune
<END>
<<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. - FAIR USE INTENDED>>>
http://bethuneinstitute.org/home.html
...As long as capitalism exists, the threat of fascism will never be eliminated.
Fascism, as a social and political movement, is a form of capitalism that does
away with the pretence of parliamentary democracy, and rules instead by force
and terror.
Today, neo-fascism is again on the rise... Fascist ideas have entered the social
mainstream and are shifting the political consensus ever further to the right.
In order to help combat and defeat contemporary fascism, the Bethune Institute
is providing an on-going series of documents exposing every facet of this most
anti-democratic form of political expression.
But neo-fascism cannot be eliminated without a radical transformation of
society. Capitalism breeds racism and fascism the way a fly breeds maggots.
The struggle against fascism, and its organized racist core, is at the same time
a revolutionary struggle against capitalism itself....
<END>
That revolution against capitalism is a communist revolution and Norman Bethune
was, in fact, a communist who supported Chairman Mao in his slaughter of
millions of anti-communists.
GOOGLE returns using key words: "Mao Bethune Revolution"
http://www.google.com/advanced_search
collect.at Mao Badges: Pins and Badges from the Cultural ...
... used in China during the Cultural Revolution and it ... white badge:
Commemorating Bai Qiu En (Norman Bethune). ... red with the character "Chong"
and Mao Portrait www.collect.at/badgeoffer.htm
Lesson Plans on China
... poem on the Long March and his speech on the selflessness of Norman Bethune,
noting two important aspects of Mao's vision of the revolution: selflessness...
Revolutionary China: The Rise Of The Communist Party...
www.columbia.edu/itc/eacp/webcourse/chinaworkbook/Lesson_Plan/RevCh_Rise_Communist.htm
1939: In Memory of Norman Bethune
... text of the Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung ... Comrade Norman Bethune,[1] a
member of the Communist ... Leninism teaches that the world revolution can only
succeed if ... www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/1939/12.htm
(Excerpts)
In Memory of Norman Bethune
by MAO TSE-TUNG December, 1939
Comrade Norman Bethune, a member of the Communist Party of Canada, was around
fifty when he was sent by the Communist Parties of Canada and the United States
to China... He arrived in Yenan in the spring of last year, went to work in the
Wutai Mountains, and to our great sorrow died a martyr at his post. What kind of
spirit is this that makes a foreigner selflessly adopt the cause of the Chinese
people's liberation as his own? It is the spirit of internationalism, the spirit
of communism, from which every Chinese Communist must learn. Leninism teaches
that the world revolution can only succeed if the proletariat of the capitalist
countries supports the struggle for liberation of the colonial and semi-colonial
peoples and if the proletariat of the colonies and semi-colonies supports the
proletariat of the capitalist countries. Comrade Bethune put his Leninist line
into practice. We Chinese Communists must also follow this line in our practice.
We must unite with the proletariat of all the capitalist countries, with the
proletariat of Japan, Britain, the United States, Germany, Italy and all other
capitalist countries, for this is the only way to overthrow imperialism... <END>
NEED I SAY MORE? Norman Bethune was a Comrade of MAO TSE-TUNG himself and the
Bethune Institute is nothing more than a communist front for revolution and
subversion!
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Thus we see B'nai Brith League for Human Rights supporting a communist front!
http://www.bnaibrith.ca/publications/audit-99/audit99-07.html
1999 Audit of anti-semitic incidents
The Struggle Against Antisemitism and Hate
...A Chill in the Air
In the past year the League has become aware of a trend whereby extreme right
wingers engage in libel law suits, attempting to impose a "libel chill" on human
rights advocates. Most notably, Eileen Pressler and her husband have
successfully sued anti-racist activist David Lethbridge in British Columbia...
<END>
http://bethuneinstitute.org/documents/escalates.html
THE ULTRA-RIGHT ESCALATES ITS ATTACKS
by David Lethbridge
Last year it became evident that a new tactic was being hatched by the extreme
right... Fromm goes on to suggest, "in a more sinister development," that the
"B'nai Brith is using its charitable status to raise funds for the communist
agitator."... <END>
You are a communist and you are an agitator and you were bank rolled by B'nai
Brith so why are you being a cry baby now David?
Here you are being featured by the Communist Party of Canada:
http://www.communist-party.ca/english/pv/dec99_antifa.html
THE SPECTRE OF GLOBAL FASCISM
By David Lethbridge, Director, Bethune Institute for Anti-Fascist Studies
(This article is from the December 1999 issue of People's Voice, Canada's
leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is
credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for
U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per
year. Send to: People's Voice, 706 Clark Drive, Vancouver, Canada, V5L 3J1.)
1999 WAS A YEAR of struggle in the anti-fascist movement. The Bethune Institute,
carrying out a consistently militant approach, was able to achieve a number of
successes...
But the main threat facing the working class of every nation is the growing
possibility of global state fascism. We must examine this possibility seriously,
neither giving way to hysterical exaggeration, nor refusing to draw the
necessary conclusions from objective political, economic, and historical
analysis.
The driving force toward global fascism is US imperialism. Like an
ever-expanding bloodstain, it is spreading and deepening its influence into
every corner of the world. Intent on global economic domination, it is backed up
by a ruthless and sophisticated military machine...
But to many workers today, the idea of global US fascism is literally
unthinkable. Imperialist control of ideology means that the very mode in which
people think is manipulated. The ideological attack against socialism,
Communism, and working-class power continues unabated. Further, since elections
continue to be held, and the State continues to operate through a multi-party
system, the spectre of global fascism remains largely invisible at very centre
of its production.
In this context, it is worth quoting what Lenin wrote in 1919, as fascism first
began to take hold: "The forms of domination may vary: capital manifests its
power in one way where one form exists, and in another way where another form
exists - but essentially the power is in the hands of capital, whether there are
voting qualifications or some other rights or not - in fact, the more democratic
it is the cruder and more cynical is the rule of capitalism. One of the most
democratic republics in the world is the United States of America, yet nowhere
is the power of capital, the power of a handful of multimillionaires over the
whole of society, so crude and so openly corrupt as in America" (The State,
Collected Works, v. 29)
Yet global US fascism is more an undeniable possibility than an accomplished
reality. Counter-trends are developing. Mass movements opposing corporate
globalization are maturing. The working class and the peasantry, especially in
South America, is rising and showing signs of strength. Organized labour in
North America is reaching toward left positions. Socialist and Communist parties
around the world are holding their own and building their base. <END>
David Lethbridge is a communist B'nai Brith fully endorses!
http://www.bnaibrith.ca/publications/audit-98/as98-03.htm
THE B'NAI BRITH CANADA
League for Human Rights
[A] set-back for the anti-racist movement in B.C., indeed across Canada, came
with the court's finding in favour of Eileen and Klaus Pressler in their
defamation suit against Dr. David Lethbridge. The Salmon Arm couple sued CHBC (a
Kelowna television station) and Lethbridge, a psychology professor and human
rights activist, on the basis of one eight minute television news story in 1993
that allegedly impugned their reputations by “unfairly casting them as white
supremacists and neo-Nazi hate mongers”.... As Lethbridge's lawyer, Irvine
Epstein. Q.C. put it: “This case is about the right, and indeed the duty of a
concerned citizen to inform and educate others in opposition to those who preach
racial hatred, bigotry and intolerance.”
The B'nai Brith Lodge and League in B.C. continue to provide moral and financial
support to Lethbridge through a province-wide and national fundraising campaign.
An appeal is planned as the eyes of the anti-racism and human rights community
are on this very important case. <END>
Thus B'nai Brith provided financial support for a communist agitator!
May I repeat- David Lethbridge in denial:
http://bethuneinstitute.org/documents/escalates.html
THE ULTRA-RIGHT ESCALATES ITS ATTACKS
by David Lethbridge
Last year it became evident that a new tactic was being hatched by the
extreme right. Anti-fascists and anti-racists had been chalking up some real
successes in publicly exposing far-right organizations, in shutting down their
meetings, and, in a few cases, getting them fired from their jobs. It was clear
that the far-right would counter-attack, and that the attack would be launched
on several fronts. One such front involves dragging anti-racists into court and
suing them...
The first of these cases was brought by the Council on Public Affairs
against David Lethbridge...
In the most recent edition of his Free Speech Monitor, Fromm makes the
truly lunatic claim that there is "an unholy alliance (of) the Communist Party
and the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith"! Such rubbish hardly requires
denial, but it is interesting to note that the old Nazi lie of the
Jewish-Bolshevik Conspiracy never dies among the far right. Indeed, they loudly
proclaim it at every opportunity.
Fromm's new evidence to support the Great Conspiracy is to claim that
the Communist Party of Canada is "bankrolling" the financial defence of the
defendant in the Council on Public Affairs lawsuit. According to Fromm, lawyer
Doug Christie "extracted" this "admission" from the defendant on the stand.
Since I happen to be the defendant, I am in a position to know what a lie this
is. No such admission was never extracted because it is not true. But then, lies
are the common currency of the far right.
Not yet done, however, Fromm goes on to suggest, "in a more sinister
development," that the "B'nai Brith is using its charitable status to raise
funds for the communist agitator."... <END>
Well Comrade Lethbridge-- Fromm was right and the web sites of B'nai Brith and
Communist Party of Canada substantiate his claims about an "unholy alliance"
between you three!
More commies aiding and abetting you:
http://www.campuslife.utoronto.ca/groups/communist/default.html
Welcome to the University of Toronto
Communist Club's Page!
We are a group of activists on campus who work and fight for the introduction of
progressive gains when possible. But most of the time we are fighting against
the forces of the right-wing that are trying to drive all of society,
universities included, back to the old, UGLIER days of capitalism. Here in
Ontario we are fighting the drastic and ill-conceived cuts to virtually every
area in which workers have made gains since the 1930s. Our membership is open to
students, staff, and faculty. Our outlook is revolutionary...
In the past few years our club's work has been in various areas including
anti-racism... As Communists, we also look at the long-term project of building
a socialist Canada.
You are Invited to Our Next Event
Knowing the Enemy: New Trends in Canadian Fascism
With David Lethbridge, Director, Salmon Arm Coalition Against Racism
Monday, March 2
7:00 pm
G.C.D.O. Hall, 290 Danforth Avenue
<END>
Does this self evident wisdom hold true?
"If communism and fascism both lead to the same end, ie. totalitarianism, Why is
it that anyone who challenges and exposes international fascism is "good", and
anyone who challenges and exposes international communism is "bad"?"
http://www.niagara.com/~freedom/anticom/comweb.htm
"...Beware of any organization that champions equality but only denounces
fascism. Communism has enslaved far more people than fascism. Any organization
that condemns fascist atrocities while denying or ignoring communist atrocities
is most certainly a communist organization. Remember also that "equality" to a
communist means the equality of slavery."
http://www.niagara.com/~freedom/anticom/first.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also see:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s71b2vk0o1r8r7dnk8n3ijlldct647par9%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR Director Ken McVay in Bed With Communists and His Animosity
Against Anti-Communists Documented ...
Message-ID: <s71b2vk0o1r8r7dnk...@4ax.com>
Date: 15 Jan 2003 15:57:20 GMT
(Very brief excerpt)
The League of Human Rights of B'nai Brith (Ken McVay's Nizkor sponsor) got a
court ruling which declares this about anti-communism:
http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/decisions/docs/league-e.htm
T.D. 15/92 Decision rendered December 16, 1992
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
R.S.C., 1985, c. H-6 (as amended)
HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL
[...]
B. THE COMPLAINTS
These complaints are brought by ... The League for Human Rights B'Nai Brith
Canada ... (1) Themes Which Promote Hatred: ...
(g) Anti-Communist Ideology .... <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3df2a771.119319192%40news5.uncensored-news.com&rnum=5
Subject: Nanaimo BC Resident Ken McVay lies about his agenda to stifle FREE
SPEECH R_1207
Message-ID: <3df2a771....@news5.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 8 Dec 2002 01:58:44 GMT
FREE SPEECH WORLDWIDE UNDER ASSAULT BY B'NAI BRITH AND NIZKOR.ORG
ASCII ART: To view the graphic you should set your news browser to view 80
columns and this is a must- set your fonts to a fixed width font such as courier
to see the image in full fidelity. If you use a proportional font or Windows
True Type proportional font the image will be grossly distorted.
You need to use a font which is 8 point. Any larger of a font may cause the
image to severely distort.
I "rendered" the image in 8 point size. You may use Windows True Type fonts if
they are fixed width such as Courier New (Western) but be warned most Windows
True Type fonts are proportional width. YOU MAY ALSO SELECT ALL TEXT AND CLICK
TO MAKE IT "BOLD" AS THIS SOMETIMES HELPS THE DEFINITION OF HARDCOPY.
Image "rendered" by Doc Tavish and given to public domain. More to come!
*************
***X##################XX*XX**
* XX#################################XX*
XX#########################################X*
X#################################################X
*##################################X#################X*
*#########################################################
*X###########################################################*
*##############################################################X
################################################################X*
X##################################################################*
*##################X################################################X
X####################################################################X
*######################################################################*
*####X##############################X#X#XXX#XX##X#####################X
##############################XXX* **XXXX#############*
X############################* *X###########
X############################# *X########*
*############################## *#####X*
#############################X ** *###*
X############################# ********X* XX
############################X ******X##X*XX #*
X############################* *X **X* XXX* X*
###########################* ** * **XXX** *** *#
X############XX###########X* XXX#X####XXXX XXXXX* #*
**#########X* **X#######X**** *######XX***** **X#X*XX
########X*XXXX *X###XXXX###XXXXXXXXX##############X** *XXXXX###X#**
X####### ##X##X X#* *****XX########XXX#####X*#############XX##X
*####### *#*X##X XX ****##X ######**###X###XX#####*##X
*######X *X####* * X##X ##X *X### X#* X#*X########X
X##### *###X X* *XXX*** X##X *X** *## *X##XXX*###
*X## *** # *X X###**#XXXX#X *XXX####
*## *XXX* #* X* *XXXXXXXXX* * *X#X #
X# ** ***X# ***XXXX** *X*#
## X#X** ** *XX* XX* *##
##X***X#*X* XX XX# X X#
X##X######X XXX *X* # * #*
X###*######X X#** X#X *X* *#
##X# ######X* *##X *XX** *X##XX* #X
*#### *####X *X*X* ** X#X * X X* ####X *#*
*#XX# *#X###X* *X#############X###*#######* *XX
XXX## *#XX###X X###########################XXXXXX*
**## *#X*X###X X########X##*X#X############X*X#**
XX *#XX X#X#** X##X########*X#**#X**#X#X*XX*XX*
* X#* *XXX ### **#########X##XX#X## X#*
* *#* *##X *X##X *###X###X#####X#X *XX
X# *###* *#### ** X###*X#*X####X X#
## *###X *X####* *XXX* X####X###X#X*#*
*#X *###XXX###X *##* **** *###*
X#* X#########X XX#** * X####*
XX* X########X* **XXXXXXX#XX*####
X# *##########X*X *####* *####
*X *############XX**XX###* *X#####*
#* **#####################X######*
** ** XX* ###########################X
** X***XX* * X####################X#*
** *XX* XX*XXX*X**X##X###############X*
*** *XX*** *XX####XXXXX####X##XXXXX
****X##X** *********X# **
**X#####XXX* *XXXX**
**X######XXXX*****
X*
Ken McVay - Director of Nizkor Rendition
No User
"Tavish" <RemoveHyphens2M...@ix.net-co-m.com> wrote in message
news:7hjr3v43ei288ep84...@4ax.com...
> This one simple question is directed toward Ken McVay, director of NIZKOR
ORG,
> which is funded (in part) through the League for Human Rights of B'nai
Brith
> Canada---
>
This will kick McVay in the ass.
Note: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy is one of the
Israeli lobby's "think tank." Many of the Israeli lobby's "experts"
come from this front group, like Martin Indyk.
1). Richard Perle----One of Bush's foreign policy advisors, he is the
chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. A very likely
Israeli government agent, Perle was expelled from Senator Henry
Jackson's office in the 1970's after the National Security Agency
(NSA) caught him passing Highly-Classified (National Security)
documents to the Israeli Embassy. He later worked for the Israeli
weapons firm, Soltam. Perle is one of the leading pro-Israeli
fanatics leading this Iraq war mongering within the administration
and now in the media.
2). Paul Wolfowitz----Deputy Defense Secretary, and member of Perle's
Defense Policy Board, in the Pentagon. Wolfowitz is a close associate
of Perle, and reportedly has close ties to the Israeli military. His
sister lives in Israel. Wolfowitz is the number two leader within the
administration behind this Iraq war mongering.
3). Douglas Feith----Under Secretary of Defense and Policy Advisor at
the Pentagon. He is a close associate of Perle and served as his
Special Counsel. Like Perle and the others, Feith is a pro-Israel
extremist, who has advocated anti-Arab policies in the past. He is
closely associated with the extremist group, the Zionist Organization
of America, which even attacks Jews that don't agree with its
extremist views. Feith frequently speaks at ZOA conferences. Feith
runs a small law firm, Feith and Zell, which only has one
International office, in Israel. The majority of their legal work is
representing Israeli interests. His firm's own website stated, prior
to his appointment, that Feith "represents Israeli Armaments
Manufacturer." Feith basically represents the Israeli War Machine.
Feith, like Perle and Wolfowitz, are campaigning hard for this
Israeli proxy war against Iraq.
4). Edward Luttwak----Member of the National Security Study Group of
the Department of Defence at the Pentagon. Luttwak is reportedly an
Israeli citizen and has taught in Israel. He frequently writes for
Israeli and pro-Israeli newspapers and journals. Luttwak is an
Israeli extremist whose main theme in many of his articles is the
necessity of the U.S. waging war against Iraq.
5). Henry Kissinger-----One of many Pentagon Advisors, Kissinger sits
on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle. For detailed
information about Kissinger's evil past, read Seymour Hersch's book
(Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House). Kissinger had a
part in the Watergate crimes, Southeast Asia mass murders, Chile
dictatorship, and more recently served as Serbian Dictator Slobodan
Milosevic's Advisor. He consistently advocates going to war against
Iraq. Kissinger is the Ariel Sharon of the U.S.
6). Dov Zakheim----Under Secretary of Defense, Comptroller, and Chief
Financial Officer (CFO) for the Department of Defense. He is an
ordained rabbi and reportedly holds Israeli citizenship. Zakheim
attended attended Jew's College in London and became an ordained
Orthodox Jewish Rabbi in 1973. He was adjunct professor at New York's
Jewish Yeshiva University. Zakheim is close to the Israeli lobby.
7). Kenneth Adelman-----One of many Pentagon Advisors, Adelman also
sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle, and is
another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supports going to war
against Iraq. Adelman frequently is a guest on Fox News, and often
expresses extremist and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim
views. Through his hatred or stupidity, he actually called Arabs
"anti-Semitic" on Fox News (11/28/2001), when he could have looked it
up in the dictionary to find out that Arabs by definition are
Semites.
8). I. Lewis Libby -----Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff.
The chief pro-Israel Jewish advisor to Cheney, it helps explains why
Cheney is so gun-ho to invade Iraq. Libby is longtime associate of
Wolfowitz. Libby was also a lawyer for convicted felon and Israeli
spy Mark Rich, whom Clinton pardoned, in his last days as president.
9). Robert Satloff----U.S. National Security Council Advisor, Satloff
was the executive director of the Israeli lobby's "think tank,"
Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Many of the Israeli
lobby's "experts" come from this front group, like Martin Indyk.
10). Elliott Abrams-----National Security Council Advisor. He
previously worked at Washington-based "Think Tank" Ethics and Public
Policy Center. During the Reagan Adminstration, Abrams was the
Assistant Secretary of State, handling, for the most part, Latin
American affairs. He played an important role in the Iran-Contra
Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to
fight Iraq, and illegally funding the contra rebels fighting to
overthrow Nicaragua's Sandinista government. He also actively
deceived three congressional committees about his involvement and
thereby faced felony charges based on his testimony. Abrams pled
guilty in 1991 to two misdemeanors and was sentenced to a year's
probation and 100 hours of community service. A year later, former
President Bush (Senior) granted Abrams a full pardon. He was one of
the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Reagan Administration's State
Department.
11). Marc Grossman-----Under Secretary of State for Political
Affairs. He was Director General of the Foreign Service and Director
of Human Resources at the Department of State. Grossman is one of
many of the pro-Israel Jewish officials from the Clinton
Administration that Bush has promoted to higher posts.
12). Richard Haass-----Director of Policy Planning at the State
Department and Ambassador at large. He is also Director of National
Security Programs and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR). He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in
the first Bush (Sr) Administration who sat on the National Security
Council, and who consistently advocates going to war against Iraq.
Haass is also a member of the Defense Department's National Security
Study Group, at the Pentagon.
13). Robert Zoellick-----U.S. Trade Representative, a cabinet-level
position. He is also one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the
Bush (Jr) Administration who advocated invading Iraq and occupying a
portion of the country in order to set up setting up a Vichy-style
puppet government. He consistently advocates going to war against
Iraq.
14). Ari Fleischer----Official White House Spokesman for the Bush
(Jr) Administration. Prominent in the Jewish community, some reports
state that he holds Israeli citizenship. Fleischer is closely
connected to the extremist Jewish group called the Chabad Lubavitch
Hasidics, who follow the Qabala, and hold very extremist and
insulting views of non-Jews. Fleischer was the co-president of
Chabad's Capitol Jewish Forum. He received the Young Leadership Award
from the American Friends of Lubavitch in October, 2001.
15). James Schlesinger-----One of many Pentagon Advisors, Schlesinger
also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is
another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supports going to war
against Iraq. Schlesinger is also a commissioner of the Defense
Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon.
16). Mel Sembler-----President of the Export-Import Bank of the
United States. A Prominent Jewish Republican and Former National
Finance Chairman of the Republican National Committee. The Export-
Import Bank facilitates trade relationships between U.S. businesses
and foreign countries, specifically those with financial problems.
17). Michael Chertoff ----Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal
Division, at the Justice Department.
18). Joshua Bolten----Bush's Chief Policy Director, banker and former
legislative aide. Prominent in the Jewish community.
19). Steve Goldsmith----Senior Advisor to the President, and Bush's
Jewish domestic policy advisor. He also serves as liaison in the
White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (White
House OFBCI) within the Executive Office of the President. He was the
former mayor of Indianapolis. He is also friends with Israeli
Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert and often visits Israel to coach mayors
on privatization initiatives.
20). Adam Goldman-----White House's Special Liaison to the Jewish
Community.
21). Joseph Gildenhorn-----Bush Campaign's Special Liaison to the
Jewish Community. He was the DC finance chairman for the Bush
campaign, as well as campaign coordinator, and former ambassador to
Switzerland.
22). Christopher Gersten-----Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary,
Administration for Children and Families at HHS. Gersten was the
former Executive Director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, Husband
of Labor Secretary, Linda Chavez, and reportedly very pro-Israel.
Their children are being raised Jewish.
23). Mark Weinberger-----Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax
Policy.
24). Samuel Bodman-----Deputy Secretary of Commerce. He was the
Chairman and CEO of Cabot Corporation in Boston, Massachusetts.
25). Bonnie Cohen-----Under Secretary of State for Management.
26). Ruth Davis-----Director of Foreign Service Institute, who
reports to the Office of Under Secretary for Management. This Office
is responsible for training all Department of State staff (including
ambassadors).
27). Lincoln Bloomfield-----Assistant Secretary of State for
Political Military Affairs.
28). Jay Lefkowitz-----General Counsel of the Office of Budget and
Management.
29). David Frum-----White House speechwriter.
30). Ken Melman-----White House Political Director.
31). Brad Blakeman------White House Director of Scheduling.
32). Colin Powell-----Secretary of State, ex-chairman of Joint Chiefs
of Staff, of Jamaican origin, he has one Jewish ancestor on his
father's side. He grew up in a heavily Jewish-populated neighborhood
in New York, and speaks Yiddish. The first day of being picked
(12/16/2000) he said he wanted to toughen sanctions on Iraq, and will
work to "re-energize the sanctions regime," even though he knows the
embargo has killed 2 million Iraqi civilians.
Now that Bush has hired these pro-Israel Jewish lobbyists to the
highest positions in the land, they have escalated the fanatical war-
mongering against Iraq, all the while they support the Israeli war-
criminal Sharon in his terrorism and mass-killings of Palestinian
civilians. It seems that the price of the acheiving the White House
involves selling out to the Israeli lobby, much like Clinton, before
him.
There are some hopeful signs coming out of the adminstration,
however. Despite this strong pro-Israeli presence within the
administration, it seems that Bush has not yet jumped on their band-
wagon, and instead is listening to the sensible leaders and advisors,
like the Pentagon's military brass, the U.S. intelligence community,
other groups within the federal government, as well as from America's
friends and allies around the world. No one wants this war except
Israel, its agents, and its lobbies around the world.
The question that remains unanswered is, will the Israeli lobby use
(or create) some scandal to blackmail Bush into attacking Iraq, like
they used Monica Lewinsky against Clinton to force him to launch
"Operation Desert Fox," in December 1998? Watch how many of the media
outlets and some politicians are blaming Bush for the all the
corporate scandals and the huge recession the U.S. is going through.
What Bush needs to do is use some common sense, and have some courage
to stand up to these pro-Israel bullies, and act in the best
interests of America, and not Israel. The first act for Bush should
be to replace these pro-Israeli fanatics with patriotic Americans.
david_michael
In fact the link between Ken McVay and 'Paul Kneisel' is even more
interesting and complex.
You will recall how McVay's various websites have been proclaiming that he
had a career in providing computer services for fish farmers, then as a
convenience store/gas station attendant, and that he went deaf because of
work at timber mills, etc. The Toronto Star, dated 22 March 1999, gives a
somewhat different picture of his career:
<begin quote>
Speaker Ken McVay, a member of the Vancouver police department for 19 years,
said advocacy groups are also guilty of apathy in response to cyber-hate.'
In 1995, McVay came across an Edmonton man's Web site that targeted
homosexuals. After contacting a Toronto advocacy group in July, 1997, and a
gay advocacy group in the fall of 1997, McVay said he's still waiting for a
response.
Silence welcomes hate crimes, he said.
"Unfortunately, hate is a marginalized issue", said McVay, stressing that a
collective powerful voice of millions opposing Internet hate is absent.
<end quote>
See http://www.efc.ca/pages/media/toronto.star.22mar99.html.
Apparently Ken McVay is a policeman.
He also had high-level connections with the armed forces long after he
apparently fled the US to avoid serving in the Vietnam War and I have Usenet
posts from him to prove it (see Usenet post by Ken McVay. Message ID:
<4...@oneb.UUCP> Date: 7 March 1991.Usenet post by Ken McVay. Message ID:
<846975973$65...@atype.com>#1/1>. Date: 2 November 1996 is also relevant).
The other real give away was the little biography that he posted about me
some time ago on the Nizkor Web site. He mentioned that, as a student, I was
a member of the Federation of Conservative Students and a group called
Campaign for More Democratic Student Representation. He was right --
although he had a lot of other dates and facts wrong. So where did he get
that info? If he'd got it from an ex-student the student concerned would
have said that I was a member of the 'Conservatives' or the 'Tories' because
nobody ever uses the term 'Federation of Conservative Students' except in
formal contexts. This was the student organization of the then-ruling Tory
Party. (Yup -- confession: I was once a Thatcher supporter.) As for the
'Campaign for More Democratic Student Representation', if my memory serves
me correctly this was the group that campaigned against membership of the
NUS and I had nothing to do with it after I joined -- my connection with it
was simply that of joining and then doing nothing. Hardly anyone would even
know that I did so. Now given that McVay's other details about my university
career were incorrect this appears to suggest that he didn't get his info
from the university authorities or from CVs sent my me to any company. The
only other people I can think of who would have access to it IN THE FORM HE
GAVE are those who have access to security establishment files on me.
See also evidence of Ken McVay's security connections posted by Thomas
Schwann (Message ID: <3590664e...@news.mindspring.com>. Date: 24 June
1998.)
Paul Kneisel, from his Usenet posts, also appears to have police/'security
establishment' connections -- his knowledge of police procedure is certainly
far in advance of what one might expect from a non-policeman/'security
establishment' person. See, for example, Message-ID:
<487qro$n...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>#1/1, 13 November 1995:
<begin quote>
From: tall...@nyc.pipeline.com (Paul Kneisel)
Subject: Re: Is this really from the FBI? (Internet Fraud)
Date: 1995/11/13
Message-ID: <487qro$n...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>#1/1
references: <481e0e$c...@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
organization: The Pipeline
newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc
The general view seems to be that it is a fraud. I agree and will not
repeat the arguments already presented by others. But, in addition to these
arguments I will further argue:
1) Law enforcement agencies routinely list the *exact* behavior that
someone is accused of violating. That is, they cite the exact law. Go to
the Post Office and look at the wanted posters and you will see the
relevant sections of the USC cited in detail.
2) Law enforcement does not routinely claim that someone is guilty of the
charges against them unless the person has already been convicted.
3) Law enforcement does not "split" investigations. In other words, if
someone is wanted for "mail fraud" and the illegal manufacture of machine
guns they do not hold off the fraud investigation until the other charge is
investigated.
4) The ostensible FBI article is internally contradictory. That is, it is
devoted to the fraud issue and then concludes that the fraud investigation
is on hold until the missing person case is handled. Logically then, they
would have focused on the missing person case in their article.
To summarize: sounds like a nasty libel against the target of the
ostensible investigation.
--
tallpaul
<end quote>
Not conclusive, I grant, but not the sort of think Joe public would know,
and especially not those who address the readers of their posts as 'Dear
Fellow Workers and Friends' (Message ID
<4epabs$h...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>#1/1, 31 January 1996). I think we have
already established that Paul is probably not an attorney. My hunch is that
McVay and Kneisel perform rather different functions. McVay gathers data on
'the Right'. Kneisel gathers data on 'the Left'. That's my theory anyway.
David
Tavish
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>Not conclusive, I grant, but not the sort of think Joe public would know,
>and especially not those who address the readers of their posts as 'Dear
>Fellow Workers and Friends' (Message ID
><4epabs$h...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>#1/1, 31 January 1996). I think we have
>already established that Paul is probably not an attorney. My hunch is that
>McVay and Kneisel perform rather different functions. McVay gathers data on
>'the Right'. Kneisel gathers data on 'the Left'. That's my theory anyway.
>
>David
Your theory has merit BUT if they are police then they are certainly leaving
their departments open for lawsuits seeing how they defame people and advocate
illegal acts. It is a criminal offense for a law enforcement official to
advocate illegal acts- which is entrapment in Peter Outerbridge's case. Yes--
Paul Kneisel is Peter Outerbridge! I know there is an actor named Peter
Outerbridge BUT there is a "communists activist" named Peter Outerbridge too who
goes by Paul Kneisel! His own ISP identified him as Peter Outerbridge and a
WhoIs on ANTI-FASCISM.ORG shows the e-mail address <tall...@nyct.net> as being
registered to Peter Outerbridge too.
See this archive for 100% proof:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=onf9vu055lkgm26ou0ifmgiagu9m9pd023%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Comrade Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's Continual Comedic Episodes
akaRe: Who Is Bradbury's Attorney?
Message-ID: <onf9vu055lkgm26ou...@4ax.com>
The above archive contains an e-mail from "Pete's" ISP regarding a complaint and
a WhoIs on Pete's web domain.
As for McVay being in law enforcement-- Canada is socialists so it wouldn't
surprise me they would have a communist hack on their payroll in an effort to
"Nazi Bait their Opposition."
Both McVay and Outerbridge are slugs and are only worthy of dishonor. Proof
Outerbridge has violated United States Code or Federal law is his seditious
rhetoric which I address in the opening of this archive with me quoting the law
and Peter advocating a revolution against capital and state.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e2357ab_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Communist Paul Kneisel Advocates a Revolution Against Capital and State
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:20:02 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s71b2vk0o1r8r7dnk8n3ijlldct647par9%404ax.com&rnum=1
steve wolk
"david_michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:3e3e...@212.67.96.135...
(Tavish jibber-jabber excised by reason of insanity)
I think we have
> already established that Paul is probably not an attorney. My hunch is
that
> McVay and Kneisel perform rather different functions. McVay gathers data
on
> 'the Right'. Kneisel gathers data on 'the Left'. That's my theory anyway.
>
> David
This "theory", like all your other "theories", doesn't hold a single drop of
water.
>
>
Black Knight
> which is funded (in part) through the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith
> Canada---
Get a job, you bum. Get off your fat butt and do something worthwhile.
Patrick Humphrey
He could have at least tried to catch some of the Columbia debris as it came
raining down (some of it at 18,000-plus feet per second, which -might- have
been enough to dent even his super-dense skull).
--PLH, even royal fuck-ups like Bradbury have an opportunity to do -some- good
Steven Mock
news:iJKcnVEr6fT...@comcast.com:
I think we have established that David E. Michael is a big hairy spider.
That's my theory anyway.
Steven Mock
--
"I may not agree with your bumper sticker;
but I'll defend your right to stick it." - Ed Anger
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>Tavish <RemoveHyphens2M...@ix.net-co-m.com> wrote in message news:<7hjr3v43ei288ep84...@4ax.com>...
>> This one simple question is directed toward Ken McVay, director of NIZKOR ORG,
>> which is funded (in part) through the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith
>> Canada---
Why can't you people answer honest questions rather than resorting to making
personal attacks? Your doing so only indicates that your team has something to
hide!
ONCE AGAIN:
<START>
This one simple question is directed toward Ken McVay, director of NIZKOR ORG,
which is funded (in part) through the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith
Canada---
Ken-- if the League for Human Rights is truly an agency safe guarding human
(excerpted)
[...]
>http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
<END>
[...]
[...]
Dr. Norman Bethune
<END>
http://bethuneinstitute.org/home.html
<END>
Also see:
"If communism and fascism both lead to the same end, ie. totalitarianism, Why is
it that anyone who challenges and exposes international fascism is "good", and
anyone who challenges and exposes international communism is "bad"?"
http://www.niagara.com/~freedom/anticom/comweb.htm
"...Beware of any organization that champions equality but only denounces
fascism. Communism has enslaved far more people than fascism. Any organization
that condemns fascist atrocities while denying or ignoring communist atrocities
is most certainly a communist organization. Remember also that "equality" to a
communist means the equality of slavery."
http://www.niagara.com/~freedom/anticom/first.htm
>
>Get a job, you bum.
I am not a bum but you are a communist bastard swine who aids and abetts
communists.
>Get off your fat butt and do something worthwhile.
My life is not any of your business you Pharisee. I am retired and I, unlike
your pal Ken McVay who regularly begs for donations, am not a bum. I am self
sufficient and Ken McVay is not. You should be telling him to get a job instead
of devising some self serving FUND after another!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhao2v4fbuij94mcmi6sicj73sa4eifsns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor
Endowment and Trust Funds?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:56:49 -0600
Message-ID: <rhao2v4fbuij94mcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e060868_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e235877_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Ken McVay pay tax on those $50,000+ donations he denies receiving?
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:23:26 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kpbl2v8od8empt5mdkt30k3t8ehs5q3jeh%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor's Ken McVay Caught Lying Big Time About his San Antonio
Connection!
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:17:47 -0600
Message-ID: <kpbl2v8od8empt5md...@4ax.com>
Tavish
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
Can't refute what I posted and all I asked was one simple honest question!
Ken McVay
Steven Mock <sm...@nizkor.org> wrote:
[Michael flushed down the ol' bradbury]
>I think we have established that David E. Michael is a big hairy spider.
>That's my theory anyway.
My theory is that he is a common thug who supports mass murder.
(1) Mr. David Michael, a disgusting, shameful Englishman,
and self-described "organizer of the Hull and North Lincolnshire
unit of the British National Party," stated his position on the
terrorist murder of about 3000 people on September 11, 2001 in
the attacks in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
<quote>
Now, however, the chickens are coming home to roost. This afternoon a
truly wonderful thing has happened: the oppressed of the earth have
turned around and have shown that they do not have to be nature's
eternal victims. They have shown that the poor, the downtrodden, and the
powerless can strike back at the very heart of the dark forces that are
oppressing them. This time it was not Palestinian children who cowered
in fear as death came from the skies -- this time it was the very fat
bankers and financiers who sustain the terroristic regime of Sharon.
This time it was those very military men who mastermind the attacks on
the women and children of Iraq. They thought they were so safe as they
planned death and destruction from their comfortable offices in the
Pentagon, and as they did their dirty deals in the World Trade Center.
Now they have been given a bloody nose that they will never forget.
Today was a glorious day. May there be many others like it.
Death to American capitalism!
Death to international finance!
David Michael
Message-ID: <3b9e...@news-uk.onetel.net.uk>
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:18:49 +0100
</quote>
(2) When challenged with: "You applaud the terror and killing of
thousands of innocent people perpetrated by the terrorists who attacked
the Pentagon and attacked and destroyed the World Trade Center, calling
their actions "a wonderful thing," the day the attacks occurred a
"glorious day," and finishing by fervently wishing for "many more" such
days.", his response was:
"I do indeed."
Message-ID: <3bae...@news-uk.onetel.net.uk>
Mon, 24 Sep 2001 02:26:45 +0100
(3) To a debating opponent who doesn't share his admiration for terrorism:
<quote>
All I can say in response to your filthy remark is that I very much hope
that, if there is an anthrax attack on America, your loved ones fall
victim to it so that you get a dose of your own putrid medicine.
</quote>
Message-ID: <3bc9...@news-uk.onetel.net.uk>
Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:34:44 +0100
<quote>
"It was not a horrific event, Tony. It was you arrogant, murderous,
scummy, neoliberal bastards getting precisely what you deserve. You
filthy pigs export your murder and your corruption and your dirt
across the world and then you play all holier-than-thou when someone
gives you a dose of your own medicine. Doesn't wash with me."
</quote>
david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael)
27 Nov 2002 20:52:20 -0800
Message-ID: <b7fe1abc.02112...@posting.google.com>
<quote>
As I have recently been appointed the organizer of the Hull and North
Lincolnshire unit of the British National Party, I'm afraid I simply
won't have time to continue our little debates in this forum. It's a
question of directing one's efforts to the place where they will have
most effect. Good wishes to all who wish to continue the good fight
here.
</quote>
david_...@onetel.net.uk (David Michael)
24 May 2001
Message-ID: <3B0C4356...@onetel.net.uk>
<quote>
Islam is not our enemy. America is our enemy. We should be fighting
shoulder-to-shoulder with our Islamic friends under the slogan
'death to America!'
</quote>
http://www.redaction.org/wwwboard/msgs5/5940.HTM
June 13, 2002
--
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465021522/thenizkorproject:
Lying About Hitler, by Dr. Richard Evans
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393020444/thenizkorproject
The Holocaust on Trial, by D.D. Guttenplan
Tavish
<Xns93179545C478...@207.35.177.135> Steven Mock <sm...@nizkor.org>
wrote:
>"steve wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote in
>news:iJKcnVEr6fT...@comcast.com:
>
>> "david_michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
>> news:3e3e...@212.67.96.135...
>>>and Friends' (Message ID
>>> <4epabs$h...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>#1/1, 31 January 1996).
>>
>> (Tavish jibber-jabber excised by reason of insanity)
Can't refute the fact that Ken McVay's funding arm (League for Human Rights of
B'nai Brith) also funds a communist agitator can you? It's a bit hypocritical
the B'nai Brith devils promote human rights but support the ideology (communism)
which has the very worse record for abusing human rights! You lefties make me
want to puke!
>>> I think we have already established that Paul is probably not an attorney. My hunch
>>> is that McVay and Kneisel perform rather different functions. McVay gathers
>>> data on 'the Right'. Kneisel gathers data on 'the Left'. That's my theory
>>> anyway.
They are communists or at least communist sympathizers. How many times have you
ever seen them bad mouth the communist ideology?
>>> David
>>
>> This "theory", like all your other "theories", doesn't hold a single
>> drop of water.
>
>I think we have established that David E. Michael is a big hairy spider.
>That's my theory anyway.
>
>Steven Mock
What does your comment have to do about the League for Human Rights financing a
communist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s71b2vk0o1r8r7dnk8n3ijlldct647par9%404ax.com&rnum=1
Paul Kneisel
<Xns93179545C478...@207.35.177.135> wrote:
>"steve wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote in
>news:iJKcnVEr6fT...@comcast.com:
>
>> "david_michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
>> news:3e3e...@212.67.96.135...
>>>and Friends' (Message ID
>>> <4epabs$h...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>#1/1, 31 January 1996).
>>
>> (Tavish jibber-jabber excised by reason of insanity)
>>
>>> I think we have
>>> already established that Paul is probably not an attorney. My hunch
>>> is that
>>> McVay and Kneisel perform rather different functions. McVay gathers
>>> data on
>>> 'the Right'. Kneisel gathers data on 'the Left'. That's my theory
>>> anyway.
>>>
>>> David
>>
>> This "theory", like all your other "theories", doesn't hold a single
>> drop of water.
>
>I think we have established that David E. Michael is a big hairy spider.
"big hairy" pro-terrorist fascist "spider" to be exact.
Steven Mock
news:o3jt3v05s96s9rrer...@4ax.com:
Do you have any idea how boring you are?
Jeff T
Paul Kneisel
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> <3e3e...@212.67.96.135> wrote:
However, I now think the data complexity has hit that interesting and fun
state where it is worthwhile to publish a detailed analysis of the Scot
Bradbury/David Michael, NA/BNP rhetorical and agitational alliance in the
newsletter.
After all, we've built up a journal with a readership of 6,000+ and neither
Bradbury or Michael have anything similar.
It will be of additional interest to see what Michael who is, after all,
the rare fascist with a PhD can dig up in the 8 years of archives and what
he can make of it. Thusfar he's discovered that my ability to look at a
"Wanted Poster" in the U.S. Post Office give me "knowledge of police
procedure is certainly far in advance of what one might expect from a
non-policeman/'security establishment' person."
Can Michael spell L-A-M-E?
-- tallpaul (Paul Kneisel)
Editor: The Internet Anti-Fascist
Tavish
"Jeff T" <jte...@spamfree.cogeco.ca> wrote:
>SQUAK! Tavish wants a cracker!
>
Can't refute the fact I posted B'nai Brith gives financial aid to a communist
can you?
Tavish
<Xns9317A65CB7D7...@206.172.150.14> Steven Mock <sm...@nizkor.org>
wrote:
>Do you have any idea how boring you are?
>
>Steven Mock
Can't refute the fact I posted B'nai Brith gives financial aid to a communist
can you?
Paul Kneisel
and political supporter of the National Alliance, writing as Tavish
<RemoveHyphens2M...@ix.net-co-m.com>
<bait3vo2eb73tq9bd...@4ax.com> ranted on about questions that
citizens need not answer, especially when asked by the likes of Bradbury.
Paul Kneisel
Nazi and political supporter of the National Alliance, writing as Tavish
<RemoveHyphens2M...@ix.net-co-m.com>
Paul Kneisel
Paul Kneisel
<RemoveHyphens2M...@ix.net-co-m.com>
<q8tt3v4qd2lasc6ug...@4ax.com> wrote:
Bradbury, like so many fascists, presents a buffoonish view of reality
where the world must answer their questions Macht Schnell!
And like so many fascists the creature is simply delusional.
Ken McVay
Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct-nospam-or-fascism.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 14:13:44 -0600, Scot Bradbury, the self-identified
>Nazi and political supporter of the National Alliance, writing as Tavish
><RemoveHyphens2M...@ix.net-co-m.com>
><oiit3v0fak3i5en90...@4ax.com> ranted on about questions that
>citizens need not answer, especially when asked by the likes of Bradbury.
One shouldn't waste any more time conversing with TubbyBlather than one
would conversing with any other bag of garbage.
When I open the garbage can to dump refuse, I don't say "Hello,
garbage, do you have any demands today?" I just toss in the garbage
and close the lid, so the stench won't disturb the family.
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a :
"DOC TAVISH" a/k/a :
"doc_t...@bigfoot.com" a/k/a :
"sonnyboy@ flash.net" :
:
[removed]xxxxxxxxxxxxx :
Bellville TX xxxxxxxxx :
:
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant Scott Bradbury (hereinafter "Defendant") is an adult
citizen and resident of the State of Texas residing at [removed]xxxxxxxxx,
Bellville, Austin County, Texas xxxxx with a telephone number of
xxx-xxx-xxxx.
3. At all times material hereto Defendant was supplied access to
the Internet and to electronic mail (hereinafter "e-mail")by Flash.net
Communications, Inc., (hereinafter "flash.net") an internet service
provider located in Forth Worth, Texas, and by other internet service
providers unknown to Plaintiff including several services which allowed
Defendant to publish and communicate by e-mail anonymously.
4. At all times material hereto Defendant published material on
the Internet and by e-mail using aliases which include but are not limited
to of "Doc Tavish," "sonn...@flash.net," "Secret Squirrel," "Mixmaster,"
"Horst Wessel," "-88-," and "Heinrich Himmler."
5. Defendant is a virulent anti-Semite who refers, inter alia, to
Jews as "vermin," advocates a "final solution" to the "Jewish problem" in
the United States and endorses the stereotype of Jews propagated by Julius
Striecher and Adolf Hitler stating, inter alia:
"What I like is the Nazi stereotype which shows the Jew as having
brushy eye brows, close set dark beady eyes and all accented by the
bulbous proboscis (big hook nose). I've seen the cartoons which shows Jews
looking like rats and I really think they are some of the most hilarious
visual images around- after all look at the typical Hollywood comedians--
all Jews! Who can't laugh at those rat like faces with the wiggling bushy
eye brows and those rat like snozzolas flapping in the breeze!"
6. At all times material hereto Defendant uses the services
provided by flash.net, with the knowledge and approval of flash.net, to
propagate his message of hate on the internet.
7. In addition to propagating his anti-Semitic propaganda on the
internet, Defendant has in the past and continues in the present to conduct
campaigns of harassment, defamation, and threats of violence against
individuals, including inter alia, the Plaintiff to this action, who
oppose his bigotry meant to frighten, annoy, and intimidate his opponents.
8. Said campaign of stalking and intimidation has been a
consistent pattern of behavior conducted by the Defendant over an extended
period of time.
9. Said campaign has included in the past threats of violence
against his opponents which has included, inter alia, the following threats
of violence:
a. On December 19, 1996, the Defendant publically made the following
threat to Keith Morrison, a citizen of Canada "I am a good shot Talmudist
if you come and find me I will demonstrate my skill to you. Do you have
any idea what the Desert Eagle .50 would do to your head? I would be legal
too- self defense from a rabid virulent anti-Christ. I promise you that
your kind are not welcome in my part of the country and I am on first name
basis with the local D.A. Hunt me down and you will be put out of your
misery like a rabid dog. One shot one kill. dead eye Doc Tavish."
b. On March 9, 1997, Defendant publically made the following
threat to person unknown "Author: Billy Dale McTavish . . . .Vengeance is
sweet and I know that the day will come when I'll get to see the sneak
that did this to me get a thorough interrogation from Bruno! I will love
standing there watching him peel your skin off layer by layer with his lash
and ever so methodically. Your screams of pain will fall on deaf ears. I
will take extreme delight in watching the foam come spewing out of your
vile mouth as Bruno gives you another! Do not worry for I will not let him
kill you. You must heal up and become well- so the process can start right
back over again to be repeated again and again. You will see no end to your
pain! I solemnly promise the day will come when the tables will turn.
Destiny will place you at my feet and you will pray for death and it will
by no means come. /s/ Tavish."
c On April 15, 1997, Defendant published the following threat to Daniel
Keren, Ph. D.: "I do believe that Bruno would derive great pleasure in
applying his craft to Mr. Keren. Yes Bruno is from the old Bavarian School
of inquisitive acquisition. Bruno knows how to stimulate every nerve but
yet not do any sort of damage. Yes Bruno would spend hours in a cold dark
damp dungeon with him. Bruno is a firm believer in the old adage: "No pain,
no gain." :-) Mr. Keren will probably over react to Bruno BUT Bruno went
back home to Bavaria a while back because certain ones in this ng hurt his
feelings! He is a big dumb brute in the common sort of way but he's such a
likable lug too! I may be able to persuade him to come back but I don't
know. If I can get Bruno back then may be Gunther and Gerhardt may return
too! They all claim that life is too hard for them in America with all of
this hatred by Nizkooks running around. They say it reminds them of when
the Communists ruled and how the Commies kept files on everyone. Reminds me
of what commie East Germany used to be!"
d. On May 2, 1998, Defendant published the following threat to someone
who disagreed with one of his bigoted rants:: "I just wish these dumb asses
would realize that they can't get away with this. I'll send a copy to
tavish-central, a copy to the Houston Branch of the FBI and a copy to the
nut cake's ISP. Now people can understand why I positively abhor the
majority of Kikes I encounter. Bruno at the moment is muttering about how
nice it would be if he would be allowed to interrogate this person. I agree
that Bruno should be able to apply his talents. I could picture Bruno being
slow and very methodical too! :-)"
e Defendant published the following threat to Mark Van Alstine, a
researcher on the Holocaust: " . . . . . Mr. Van Alstine is a saboteur of
Nizkor [http://nizkor.org; a site on the Internet about the history of the
Holocaust] and that is all we need to bring hin in for an especially
vigorous interrogation! He will not be so cocky after Bruno works with him.
Don't worry Bruno has never killed anyone yet and he is a master at his
craft. Bruno could rightfully be called a master of pain for he knows how
to work every nerve and fiber to achieve the results desired with the very
least amount of tissue damage. The man is devoted to his work as a true
artisan!"
f Defendant has published the following threat to Jeffrey G. Brown
"I'll beat you to a bloody pulp."
g. Defendant has publically addressed the following threat to a person
publishing anonymous material: "Why don't you identify yourself then? Bruno
has already picked the lash he will use in my interrogation of you. He at
first opted for his short fat bull whip. This whip does not cut the flesh
but it makes extremely painful throbbing welts that only diminish in pain
over a few days. He has chosen his custom stage coach style whip that is
nearly twenty feet long. Each stroke is just like a hot knife hitting
butter. This whip n each stroke cuts beyond the subcutaneous epidermal
layers. He'll literally peel you like an onion. Each stroke of this lash
will feel just like having a white hot wire streak across your back and
buttocks. Bruno is an artisan at his craft and he most eagerly awaits
hoisting you up in manacles to administer the "truth serum." I will relish
watching you flop around like a fish. Pleasant dreams!"
h. Defendant addressed the following threat to Joel Rosenberg, a citizen
of Minnesota: " Herr Rosenberg so very nice of you to slither out and play
tonight! We all see that you have not for once changed your tone yes? You
will change your tune very soon! They all do; believe me they all do! We
have a nice damp dungeon all prepared for you in Berlin. We will talk at
great length and get to the very root of your attitude yes? I personally
will not let Bruno interrogate you too long no!"
i. Defendant publically addressed the following threat of violence to
another person: "Yeah SOG [sic] just keep your mouth running while you can.
You'll be squealing like stuck pig when we shove the rotisserie skewer
where the sun don't shine on April 20th! You'll cook quite well over an
open fire! You'll probably give us all gas BUT that is why we'll have
plenty of Tagment [sic] on hand. Burp! Bruno says that he knows how to
tenderize you too. I think he wants to use his 20 foot whip! Ouch!:
j. Defendant has publically addressed the following threat to another
person: "I can only say that Bruno knows that this happened and right now
he is outside practicing with his whip. Her looks mighty g-d damned furious
in the hot Texas sun cracking that whip. Damn it sounds like a 30' 06 going
off each time he pops that thing. I'd hate to "Count 25" for him! Yes,
indeedy!! :-) Doc Tavish Singing "Our Day Will Come!"
k. In December, 1999, Defendant publically addressed the following threat
to Sara Salzman, a citizen of Colorado: "Bruno [sic] eagerly awaits the day
when he is able to peel your kind like onions with his lash. I could just
see the sweat and blood spray when Bruno lays on the flay. In your case I
wouldn't want him to damage your hide. I want a new shade for my floor lamp
and a new holster for my Desert Eagle pistol. Bruno would, in your case,
use electricity and the various exploitations of body cavities with large
blunt objects. :-) . . . . .Mazel Tob you witch. /s/ Doc Tavish.
j. On or about December 7, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
to an unknown person: "I will get revenge sooner or later for your inciting
blacks to harass me by e-mail. You're on federal territory now! You WILL be
ferreted out- make no mistake about it! BTW if you were to only think about
it- your very actions only make others believe that I am justified in my
dislike of your kind. You are sneaky rat like vermin meant to be hunted
down and eliminated. :-) Just call me the Verminator! /s/ Doc Tavish/"
10. Said campaign of threats was maliciously designed to frighted,
intimidate, annoy, harass, and silence any person who objected to
Defendant's anti-Semitic agenda by having a chilling effect on any person
expressing or considering expressing opposition to Defendant's bigotry.
11. Said campaign of harassment and intimidation has included,
inter alia, the publication of the private names and addresses of his
victims and their families with suggestions of violence and the offering of
rewards to those who would supply him with the addresses and telephone
numbers of his victims.
12. Said campaign of harassment has included the forging of
communications and publishing such forgeries representing that they
originated with the victims of his campaigns of harassment.
13. Said campaign of harassment has included the publication and
circulation of claims which are false and known by Defendant to be false
concerning the sexual orientation and practices of his opponents.
14. Said campaign of harassment has included harassment by sending
his opponents harassing electronic communications (e-mail) including sexual
innuendo, threats, and bigoted slurs.
15. Defendant is supported and assisted in his campaigns of
harassment as aforesaid by various accomplices who Plaintiff believes and
therefore avers include, inter alia:
16. The aforesaid campaigns arise from Defendant;'s pathological
hatred of Jew and/or any person opposed to his pathological hatred and are
conducted maliciously, wantonly, wilfully, and recklessly by the Defendant
and his accomplices and in outrageous disregard of the rights of his
victims with the specific purpose of intimidating and silencing his
opponents, intentionally causing them mental distress, anguish and grief,
and adversely affecting their reputation in the communities in which they
reside.
17. That such purpose and intent of Defendant is known to
Defendant's accomplices who actively support Defendant's goals and purposes
and assist him in stalking his victims during his campaigns of harassment,
defamation, and intimidation.
18. Such agreement on the part of his accomplices includes the
ethnic prejudice and hatred that motivates Defendant.
19. That said accomplices include, inter alai:
a. David E. Michael, a British neo-Nazi and denier of the Holocaust who is
an adherent of and/or organizer for the neo-Nazi British National Party.
b. Don Ellis, an anti-Semite and debunker of the Holocaust who resides in
Star City, Arkansas.
c. A person publishing material on the internet through remarq.com under
various pseudonyms including but not limited to, "Mike Kalvatis," "Pat
Blakely," "Jesus Christ," "RevWhte," "Rabbi Brimstone" and various forged
headers. Plaintiff believes and therefore avers that said person is the
aforementioned Don Ellis.
20. That the various accomplices of Defendant are aware of his
activities and act in concert with him and with his aid, assistance and
approval.
21. That the existence, purpose, nature, and intent of Defendant's
activities is know to flash.net which continues to allow the Defendant to
use their facilities for such purposes and otherwise supports the
activities of the Defendant.
COUNT I: Harassment by Telephonic Communication
21. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 20 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
22. At various times Defendant has communicated with Plaintiff by
electronic mail (e-nail) which is sent through interstate telephone lines
and received through a telephone connection maintained by Plaintiff and, as
such, constitutes telephonic communication.
23. That as part of his campaign of harassment and intimidation
Defendant has, in the past, sent Plaintiff electronic communications
consisting of the word "kike" repeated several hundred times.
24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You only want to blow Joe
You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-1."
25 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
Joe me thinks Yale wants to suck your cock and you're right --Yale is a
queer -- he does suck cock
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-2."
26 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Are you homosexual, Yale?
Your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely trying to
make trouble like a malicious fag does
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-3."
27. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Yale wants to suck your cock Joe and he doesn't know how to ask so he
persists in his silly games to get your attention -- fags are in a lot of
ways just like little girls -- just ignore cock sucker Edeiken and he'll
most likely will try to go after another person."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-4"
28 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"and you still want to wrap your lips around his aryan cock"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-5."
29 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
Yale Edeiken wants to suck Joe Bellinger's cock
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-6"
30. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Yale still wants to suck Joe's aryan cock"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-7"
31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"So why do you still want to suck his cock?
Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
Doc Tavish"
32 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff
an electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"And you're still a flaming fag cock sucker/"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-9."
33. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"What are you doing, Yale trolling for young boys again ? We all know you
have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who
oppose"gay rights" We also know how you have slandered the most righteous
Rev Fred Phelps in the past for his stands against the homosexual
lifestyle.
When are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and seek
to live a meaningful life with purpose? Why do you wish to portray
yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
Allentown Pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
pride at all?"
I guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
homosexual sympathist from Nizkor you are -- why are Nizkorians so
pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you are
homosexual. If any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group
because you all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with
your Barbie doll faggot child molester
Doc Tavish:
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-10."
34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made.
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A11."
35 That on July 31, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic
communication stating in pertinent part:
"You want to suck Tavish's, Vange's and Phillips' Nazi cocks. Why does your
side call others homophobes? You must either be homo or at least
sympathetic to their utterly disgusting ways! I'd bet that you suck cock
and butt fuck too! Careto deny it?
Bickhus Dickhus
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-12."
36. That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You want to lick Tavish's prick like a little kid licks a lollipop."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-13."
37 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You only act up because Tavish won't let you use your tongue on him."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-14."
38 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Yale and Jeffrey want to gang rape Tavish because Tavish won't give in to
their homosexual lusts."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-15."
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
40. Said telephonic communications were intended and designed to
alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress
upon Plaintiff and that such damages actually occurred.
41. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
42, Said telephonic communications were received by the Plaintiff
within the City of Allentown, County of Lehigh, Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania whereby jurisdiction is vested in this Honorable Court.
43. Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
criminal laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
44, Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
45. Said telephonic communications were made willfully, wantonly,
and in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious
intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and
to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT II: Harassment by Terorrostic Threat
46. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 45 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
47. Defendant has, at various times, publically made threat of
violence against Plaintiff consistent with the pattern of his threats
against others.
48 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
49. Said telephonic communication was received by the Plaintiff
within the City of Allentown, County of Lehigh, Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania whereby jurisdiction is vested in this Honorable Court.
50. On November 14, 1999, Defendant made the following public
statement to Plaintiff:
"I'd say that the above is explicit evidence of libel and slander. I surely
wish Mr. Richard Phillips et al immediately files suit, has subpoenas
herewith issued. I will be glad to attend the trial and I hope that a good
public flogging is part of the reparations Yale has to receive in lieu of
monetary damages he will have to render. . . . BTW Richard- Bruno has
volunteered to administer the flogging if is permissible [sic] by the
court. He has been practicing a lot lately. Perhaps he senses something
in the air. I hate saying it but he is somewhat bestial or animalistic in
his instincts but he is loyal to me to the end."
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
52. On December 18, 1999 Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
"Remember Yale- the jury award I seek is not monetary but to have full
access to you for thirty [sic] minutes in front of the court house to
literally beat you black and blue without any civil or criminal
repercussions. I really believe that this would be the only fair and
equitable verdict! : It will be just you and me Yale and I promise you that
you will think a long damned time because you will hurt for a long time
before you will engineer anymore of your malicious devilish mischief. Doc
Tavish Merrily Waiting on Judgment Day."
53. On December 19, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
"Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH (Standing Behind Yale With a Big Fat
Truncheon) . . . . Give me a break and just let a court grant me thirty
minutes immunity from any criminal or civil action- I would just love to
beat Yale to a jolly bloody pulp in front of his family. To me this is the
only form of fair justice. I promise that I will not take his life nor do
any permanent physical harm but I guarantee Yale will be sore for a very
long time. That is a solemn promise I would like to make and keep!"
54. Defendant has repeatedly published this and similar threats
to Plaintiff on various occasions since the original publication of these
threats.
55. Said threats were intended and designed to alarm, harass,
intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon Plaintiff
and that such damages actually occurred.
56. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
57. Said threats were made over the internet in violation of the
criminal laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
58, Said threats were made in violation of the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
59. Said threats were made willfully, wantonly, and in outrageous
disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious intent of
harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and to have a
chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT III: Harassment by Incitement of Others
60. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 59 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
61. As part of his consistent pattern of harassment Defendant has,
individually and in collaboration with others published the names,
addresses, and telephone numbers of his opponents with requests that others
harass those who object to the anti-Semitic propaganda he distributes.
62. Said information has included the names, addresses, and
telephone numbers of his detractors families, parents, children, employers,
associates, and neighbors with instructions that they be contacted with
false and/or outrageous material about his detractors private lives.
63. Said campaigns of stalking and harassment have included the
offering of rewards and other encouragements to various of Defendant's
accomplices to provide him with such information to assist Defendant in his
stalking, harassment, and intimidation of his victims.
64. Together with the accomplices named above and various others
unknown to Plaintiff, Defendant has compiled and published and/or assisted
in the compilation and publication of the "Nizkor Telephone Book" which
publishes such information in a malicious effort to harass, annoy, and
intimidate his detractors and to have a chilling effect upon their exercise
of their right of free speech
65. Such acts were done maliciously with the intent of harassing,
annoying and intimidating his detractors, adversely affecting their private
lives and employment, and chilling their exercise of their right of free
speech.
66. In or about April, 1998, Defendant commenced such a public
campaign of stalking, harassment, and intimidation against Plaintiff.
67. Prior to commencing this campaign of harassment Defendant
published the following statement on April 28, 1998, directed at Plaintiff
under his nom de plume of "Doc Tavish":
Hey, Yale, you were right about you being easy to find . What do the folks
in Allentown think knowing the have a socialist living on the block? :-) Be
sure to give my regards to "Alta" if you get my drift! /s/ Tavish
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B-1."
68. Said message was intended and published in order to alarm and
harass Plaintiff and by making him believe that Defendant knew where
Plaintiff lived, intimidate Plaintiff from publishing material critical of
Defendant.
69. At approximately the same time Defendant, referring to himself
as "Gumshoe Tavish" made similar claims about the location of one Jeffrey
G. Brown and threatened to reveal to the alleged neighbors of Jeffrey G.
Brown that he was a pederast.
70. Shortly thereafter Defendant began to publish Plaintiff's
name, address, and telephone number using a variety of services which
disguised his location together with requests that others harass the
Plaintiff.
71. The first such message was published on June 1, 1998, with the
phrase "Reach out and touch someone." Attached. Said post is attached
hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B-2."
72. That the intention of such message was to alarm Plaintiff and
intimidate him from criticizing Defendant and inciting others to criminally
harass Plaintiff.
73, That similar messages were published by Defendant on a regular
and continual basis with the final form of the message being to following
example published on December 7, 1999:
Yale F. Edeiken, ZHID, of 1590 Alta Dr., Allentown, Pa, wants lots of
late night callers, and will even welcome visitors, late nights, to
discuss the Holohoax. He can be reached at 610 435-9820 He even likes
discussing, and even meeting with faggots, and other pedophiles to discuss
matters. His specialties are butt-fucking, cocksucking, and fondling
tinky winkies.
Yale likes to go to peep shows and likes group grope at the local gay bar
in Allentown. -88- Horst Wessel
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit
"B-3."
74. Said message was published by Defendant over one hundred (100)
times.
75. That the intention of such message was to alarm Plaintiff and
intimidate him from criticizing Defendant and inciting others to criminally
harass Plaintiff.
76. In addition to publishing the Plaintiff's name, address, and telephone
number, Defendant acting individually and by and/or in concert with his
aforementioned accomplices published the names addresses and telephone
numbers of Plaintiff's ,family including his wife, father, brother, sister,
stepmother and business associates with similar invitations to harass,
annoy and frighten them.
77. Said information was provided both separately and as part of
the aforementioned "Nizkot Telephone Book" where other opponents of
Defendant and his accomplices were similarly harassed.
78. All such publications were made either by the Defendant and/or
with his knowledge, consent, approval, and cooperation.
79. Said publications and incitements were intended and designed
to alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional
distress upon Plaintiff and others and that such damages actually occurred.
80. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
91. Said publications and incitements were made over the internet
in violation of the criminal laws of the United States and the criminal
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
82, Said threats were made in violation of the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
83. Said threats were made willfully, wantonly, and in outrageous
disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious intent of
harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and to have a
chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT IV: Defamation
84. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 83 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
85. As part of his publications concerning Plaintiff and other,
Defendant consistently fabricated false allegations against Plaintiff and
others and knowingly published said fabrications as fact with the malicious
intent of damaging the reputations of Plaintiff and others.
87. Said fabrications were known by the Defendant and his
accomplices to be false and defamatory.
88. Many of the said defamatory publications were made directly to
third parties within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with the intention of
damaging the reputation of Plaintiff within the community in which he
resides thereby vesting jurisdiction with this Honorable Court.
89. On or about October 26, 1999, Defendant began a campaign of
defamation against Plaintiff by publishing a claim that Plaintiff had sent
hin and electronic communication stating: ""Scottie if only I have you just
one night I's give you something no woman will ever be able to give you.
Give up women and join our ranks." Said publication is attached hereto and
made part hereof as Exhibit "C-1."
90. Said publication was false and defamatory in that it
represented that Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual advances to Defendant.
91. No such communication was made but, rather, it was
maliciously fabricated by Defendant with the intent of defaming Plaintiff.
92. When Plaintiff complained to Defendant about his forgery,
Defendant again published said forgery and threatened to send said
publication to Plaintiff's internet service provider who would then
"wonder" about the Plaintiff. Said publication is attached hereto and made
part hereof as Exhibit "C-2."
93. Said publication is a direct admission of the malicious intent
on the part of Defendant to defame Plaintiff.
94. On or about November 2, 1999, Defendant published the claim
that "You have threatened to do a "homosexual gang rape" to be ASSisted by
your pals Jeffrey G. Brown and Ken McVay - what else can you say other than
you're gay? /s/ Doc Tavish." Said publication is attached hereto and made
part hereof as Exhibit "C-3."
95. Said publication was false and defamatory in that it
represented that Plaintiff had threatened Defendant with sexual
molestation.
96. No such communication was made but, rather, it was
maliciously fabricated by Defendant with the intent of defaming Plaintiff.
97 On or about October 27, 1999, Defendant published an article
entitled "Attention Faggots Yale F. Edeiken and Jeffrey G. Brown" in which
he again repeated\ his allegation that Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual
advances to him. Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof
as Exhibit "C-4."
98. Said publication was false and defamatory in that it
represented that Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual advances to Defendant.
99. On or about October 27, 1999, Defendant again maliciously
published a communication which he falsely and maliciously claimed had been
written by the Plaintiff and, again, falsely and maliciously claimed that
the Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual advances to hi,. Said publication
is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-5."
100. Said defamatory publication was forwarded directly to
Enter.net, business located within the County of Lehigh. Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, thereby vesting jurisdiction in this Honorable Court.
101. On or about October 28, 1999, Defendant again refused to
retract his false and defamatory statements insisting that the fabrications
he had published were accurate. Said publication is attached hereto and
made part hereof as Exhibit "C-6."
102. Defendant again forwarded said malacious and defamatory
communication to Enter.net, a third person located within Lehigh County,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
103. On or about October 28, 1999, Defendant again refused to
retract his false and defamatory statements insisting that the fabrications
he had published were accurate, stating in pertinent part:
". . . . what we have here is a textbook case of how homosexuals really
hate being rejected. Yale will not take "NO" as answer [sic] O don't
care that he can use his tongue in his misguided attempt to show "50 Ways
to Leave My (Female) Lover."
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-7."
104. On or about November 3, 1999, published a false and
defamatory statement claiming that Plaintiff was sexual pervert engaging in
sex with animals. Said publication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "C-8."
105. On or about November 3, 1999, Defendant made a further false
and defamatory publication again stating that Plaintiff had sex with
animals and further stating that Plaintiff was a "neo-Bolshevist" who
wanted to turn the United States into a Soviet-style dictatorship. Said
publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-9."
106. On or about November 7, 1999, Defendant again fabricated
material which he claimed had been written by Plaintiff and maliciously
published it on the int4rnet and sent a copy of his false and defamatory
statement to Enter.net, a business located within the County of Lehigh,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Said publication is attached hereto and made
part hereof as Exhibit "C- 10."
107. On or about November 11, 1999, Defendant published the
following false and defamatory statement about Plaintiff on the internet
stating in pertinent part:
" . . . . .faggots Brown and Edeiken will positively not leave me alone.
What is it about homosexuals that the more they are rejected and dejected
the more they have to keep coming after a person? It must be some
"feminine" quirk resembling "hell hath no fury like a rejected or scorned
woman." . . . .Again Yale F.. Edeiken won't leave me alone and now his
fellow anti-Christ and Sodomite is moving in for the kill. See what being
the quintessential Aryan gets you."
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-11."
108. In addition to the defamatory material recited above
Defendant has continually referred to Plaintiff in his various publications
as a "shyster," a "criminal" and a "Bolshevist."
109. In each of the hundreds of times Defendant has maliciously
published such false and defamatory material both published on the internet
and communicated to third persons within the County of Lehigh, Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania material Defendant has intended to adversely effect the
reputation of the Plaintiff.
110. Plaintiff has continually contacted Defendant, informed him
of the defamatory nature of the material that he publishes and sends to
third parties.
111. Plaintiff has additionally contacted Flash.net Communications
and informed them of the various defamatory statements made by Defendant
and the various forgeries he has distributed through their facilities.
112. In response to the demands for retraction Defendant has
replied "Fuck off, Kike." and "Eat shit, Kike."
113. Defendant has, further, acted in concert with Flash.net
Communications to block any demands for a retraction by threatening the
internet services of others.
114. Defendant has, further, acted in concert with his accomplices
named above to further spread the defamatory statements published by
Defendant.
115. Said publications and their distribution were intended and
designed to injure the reputation of Plaintiff and alarm, harass,
intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon Plaintiff
and others and that such damages actually occurred.
116. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
116. Said defamation was done maliciously willfully, wantonly, and
in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious
intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and
to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT V: Invasion of Privacy
117. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 116. of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
118. The falsehoods and forgeries as stated above constitute an
invasion of privacy under the false light doctrine.
119. Said invasions of privacy and their distribution were
intended and designed to injure the reputation of Plaintiff and alarm,
harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon
Plaintiff and others and that such damages actually occurred.
120. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
121. Said invasions of privacy were done maliciously willfully,
wantonly, and in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the
malicious intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating
Plaintiff and to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of
free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
c/o Trainor Law Offices
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
610-435-9820
Black Knight
What makes you think anybody here gives a flying fuck about your
stupid bullshit? You might consider yourself to be the center of the
universe, but, I consider you to be a piece of space junk.If you were
sucked into the gravitational pull of Jupiter and smashed to dust on
her surface, it wouldn't make any difference.
Bruno
steve wolk
"Steven Mock" <sm...@nizkor.org> wrote in message
news:Xns93179545C478...@207.35.177.135...
> "steve wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote in
> news:iJKcnVEr6fT...@comcast.com:
>
> > "david_michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> > news:3e3e...@212.67.96.135...
> >>and Friends' (Message ID
> >> <4epabs$h...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>#1/1, 31 January 1996).
> >
> > (Tavish jibber-jabber excised by reason of insanity)
> >
> >> I think we have
> >> already established that Paul is probably not an attorney. My hunch
> >> is that
> >> McVay and Kneisel perform rather different functions. McVay gathers
> >> data on
> >> 'the Right'. Kneisel gathers data on 'the Left'. That's my theory
> >> anyway.
> >>
> >> David
> >
> > This "theory", like all your other "theories", doesn't hold a single
> > drop of water.
>
> I think we have established that David E. Michael is a big hairy spider.
> That's my theory anyway.
Maybe, but I don't think so. There is no doubt in my mind, however, that
they have collaborated on a certain project.
Black Knight
The theory was once widely held that the Earth was flat.
There was another that the sun revolved around the Earth.
Physicians during the Middle Ages had a theory that opening a man's
veins and letting blood out would cure disease.
Those who plotted against the Roman emperors disproved that idea-they
used it to commit suicide when their plot failed.
Bruno
> >
> >
Black Knight
> In article <7ftt3vooju8s8o7n6...@4ax.com>,
> Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct-nospam-or-fascism.net> wrote:
> >On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 14:13:44 -0600, Scot Bradbury, the self-identified
> >Nazi and political supporter of the National Alliance, writing as Tavish
> ><RemoveHyphens2M...@ix.net-co-m.com>
> ><oiit3v0fak3i5en90...@4ax.com> ranted on about questions that
> >citizens need not answer, especially when asked by the likes of Bradbury.
>
> One shouldn't waste any more time conversing with TubbyBlather than one
> would conversing with any other bag of garbage.
The owner of my favorite Chinese restaurant likes to update Chinese
philosophy to the technology of modern times: He says:
Man who post shit most likely full of shit.(apologies to Confucius)
Bruno
>
>
Roger
in message <3e3e...@212.67.96.135>,
>In fact the link between Ken McVay and 'Paul Kneisel' is even more
>interesting and complex.
>
>You will recall how McVay's various websites have been proclaiming that he
>had a career in providing computer services for fish farmers, then as a
>convenience store/gas station attendant, and that he went deaf because of
>work at timber mills, etc. The Toronto Star, dated 22 March 1999, gives a
>somewhat different picture of his career:
>
><begin quote>
>Speaker Ken McVay, a member of the Vancouver police department for 19 years,
>said advocacy groups are also guilty of apathy in response to cyber-hate.'
>
>In 1995, McVay came across an Edmonton man's Web site that targeted
>homosexuals. After contacting a Toronto advocacy group in July, 1997, and a
>gay advocacy group in the fall of 1997, McVay said he's still waiting for a
>response.
>
>Silence welcomes hate crimes, he said.
>
>"Unfortunately, hate is a marginalized issue", said McVay, stressing that a
>collective powerful voice of millions opposing Internet hate is absent.
><end quote>
>
>See http://www.efc.ca/pages/media/toronto.star.22mar99.html.
Still haven't learned that newspapers don't always get everything
right, huh?
>Apparently Ken McVay is a policeman.
Only in the kind of world where saying "Your side won, our side lost"
in reference to WWII doesn't make you a Nazi sympathizer...
>He also had high-level connections with the armed forces long after he
>apparently fled the US to avoid serving in the Vietnam War
You misspelled "after having already served in the Vietnam War" above.
Since you have been corrected on the matter before, this is knowingly
repeating a falsehood.
Steve: what's that called again?
>and I have Usenet
>posts from him to prove it (see Usenet post by Ken McVay. Message ID:
><4...@oneb.UUCP> Date: 7 March 1991.Usenet post by Ken McVay. Message ID:
><846975973$65...@atype.com>#1/1>. Date: 2 November 1996 is also relevant).
So the fact that he supported a campaign to send letters to soldiers
serving in Desert Storm and the fact that several members of his
family, including himself have served in the military support your
contentions that he fled while maintaining "high-level"
connections...how?
Do you really not see that these two claims are mutually exclusive?
>The other real give away was the little biography that he posted about me
>some time ago on the Nizkor Web site.
< snip to>
>Now given that McVay's other details about my university
>career were incorrect this appears to suggest that he didn't get his info
>from the university authorities or from CVs sent my me to any company. The
>only other people I can think of who would have access to it IN THE FORM HE
>GAVE are those who have access to security establishment files on me.
So you have *seen* these files, and know that they contain such
errors?
If not, why should your lack of knowledge about Ken's sources suggest
anything but your ignorance?
>See also evidence of Ken McVay's security connections posted by Thomas
>Schwann (Message ID: <3590664e...@news.mindspring.com>. Date: 24 June
>1998.)
I see a bunch of claims that cannot be verified made by someone who
apparently only posted *ever* between the dates of Jun. 19, 1998 and
Jun. 26, 1998 about events from two years earlier -- why should this
be considered proof of anything? Perhaps you can try to find some of
the alt.revisionism posts referred to ("When it was announced in
alt.revisionism that finger was operating again, it was shut off again
within 24 hours" )
>Paul Kneisel, from his Usenet posts, also appears to have police/'security
>establishment' connections -- his knowledge of police procedure is certainly
>far in advance of what one might expect from a non-policeman/'security
>establishment' person. See, for example, Message-ID:
><487qro$n...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>#1/1, 13 November 1995:
>
>
><begin quote>
>From: tallpau l...@nyc.pipeline.zl6PaulKneiselSubjectReIsthisreallyfromtheFBIInternetFraudDate19951113Message-ID487qro$n...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com#11references481e0e$c...@ixnews5.ix.netcom.zl6organizationThePipelinenewsgroupsnews.admin.net-abuse.misc
>
>
>The general view seems to be that it is a fraud. I agree and will not
>repeat the arguments already presented by others. But, in addition to these
>arguments I will further argue:
>
>1) Law enforcement agencies routinely list the *exact* behavior that
>someone is accused of violating. That is, they cite the exact law. Go to
>the Post Office and look at the wanted posters and you will see the
>relevant sections of the USC cited in detail.
>
>2) Law enforcement does not routinely claim that someone is guilty of the
>charges against them unless the person has already been convicted.
>
>3) Law enforcement does not "split" investigations. In other words, if
>someone is wanted for "mail fraud" and the illegal manufacture of machine
>guns they do not hold off the fraud investigation until the other charge is
>investigated.
>
>4) The ostensible FBI article is internally contradictory. That is, it is
>devoted to the fraud issue and then concludes that the fraud investigation
>is on hold until the missing person case is handled. Logically then, they
>would have focused on the missing person case in their article.
>
>To summarize: sounds like a nasty libel against the target of the
>ostensible investigation.
<snip DEM's demonstration of usenet.cluelessness>
<end quote>
Of course, mr michael doesn't mention that Paul's assessment was
apparently in error (as evidenced by the fact that someone actually
called the FBI to confirm,) since this would blow his whole "advanced
knowledge of police procedure" claim out of the water...
>Not conclusive, I grant, but not the sort of think Joe public would know,
>and especially not those who address the readers of their posts
>as 'Dear Fellow Workers and Friends' (Message ID
<4epabs$h...@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>#1/1, 31 January 1996).
And Paul's mode of address here indicates *what* exactly about the
likelihood that he would or would not be able to make the observations
he did?
>I think we have already established that Paul is probably not an attorney.
>My hunch is that McVay and Kneisel perform rather different functions.
>McVay gathers data on 'the Right'. Kneisel gathers data on 'the Left'.
>That's my theory anyway.
Of course, it's apparently also your theory that no one notices you
running from addressing your several lies after having specifically
asked for them.
Which shows how much your theories are worth...
Steven Mock
news:datt3vsh94msvj406...@4ax.com:
Don't see why I should bother.
I take it that's a no to my question?
steve wolk
"Roger" <roger@.> wrote in message
news:tqfu3v4lljpqrnm37...@4ax.com...
It's called "lying". He ALWAYS lies.
steve wolk
"Roger" <roger@.> wrote in message
news:tqfu3v4lljpqrnm37...@4ax.com...
ixnews5.ix.netcom.zl6organizationThePipelinenewsgroupsnews.admin.net-abuse.m
A bucket of warm spit comes to mind.
Sigmund Hoenigsberg
Thanks for a brilliant insight which merits more debate:
"..no shit is created of destroyed, it merely changes its form.."
Alien
You ask neither simple or honest questions. When you are given answers
you do nothing but whine, and why? You cannot understand that which is
written in answer to your blatherings.