Did "Methodism" Make Patrick L. Humphrey a Blasphemer of Jesus and a Hater Pro-Life People? aka Re: WE HOPE SCOTT BRADBURY IS DEAD R_)827
Tavish
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Sean Cyril O'Tavish <Sean_Cyril_O'Tav...@IRISH-TAVISH-CENTRAL.NET> writes:
>
>>On 07 Aug 2003 02:25:56 -0500, <szkekzy...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick
>>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>>sjoh...@bigfeet.com (Steven Johnston) writes:
>
>>>>Just like Jews to fight dirty.
:.
>>>That explains why I've been a member of the United Methodist Church all my
>>>life.
You certainly don't act like a member of that denomination with all the
disrespectful things you are on record as saying about Jesus which I show
further down.
>>I thought you were an agnostic!
:.
>[Bradbury's obsession with Google]
Can't stand to have your lies exposed can you?
Restored:
I thought you were an agnostic!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szk7k5qy1sv.fsf%40fnord.io.com&rnum=1
Sender: pat...@fnord.io.com
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.religion.christian,
alt.religion.christian.episcopal,alt.bible,alt.abortion
Subject: Re: **Hyperconservative** Episcopals: Don't let the door...
References: <3f30ef54...@netnews.mchsi.com>
<St6Ya.80170$YN5.59317@sccrnsc01> <v6t1jvckbt17cptb3...@4ax.com>
<3F311AB0...@btopenworld.com>
From: Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
Date: 06 Aug 2003 15:21:52 -0500
Message-ID: <szk7k5q...@fnord.io.com>
"-PLH, no wonder I'm a fundamentalist agnostic"
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=agnostic+author:patrick%40io.com&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=7&as_miny=2003&as_maxd=7&as_maxm=8&as_maxy=2003&filter=0
Searched Groups for agnostic author:pat...@io.com from Jul 12, 2003 to today.
Results 1 - 4 of 4.
>>Since when are Methodists agnostics? Caught you in a lie didn't I?
:.
>Not at all, dumbass. Have some adult attempt to enlighten you as to what
>"agnostic" means, and then get back to me.
http://poets.notredame.ac.jp/cgi-bin/wn?cmd=wn&word=institution#searchform
1 sense of agnostic
Sense 1
agnostic, doubter -- (a person who doubts truth of religion)
nonreligious person -- (a person who does not manifest devotion to a deity)
agnostic, doubter -- (a person who doubts truth of religion)
Looks like you don't know the definition of "agonistic" you liar.
>-PLH, honest enough to admit I don't know everything
You really don't know much of anything and it is obvious because all you can do
is make personal attacks and insult people 99 times out of a 100 which is the
sure sign of a person who can't support his views/beliefs with facts.
Methodist Patrick L. Humphrey showing his love for Jesus:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ipj8iv08hfma986pntotfots2kjsqe761s%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: All Anyone Needs to Know About Stalker Patrick L. Humphrey
Message-ID: <ipj8iv08hfma986pn...@4ax.com>
(Excerpt)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ii06cvgc9liu2ubjqfutaoqqh708o03693%404ax.com&rnum=2
Message-ID: <ii06cvgc9liu2ubjq...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkbsfng5a6.fsf%40eris.io.com&rnum=2
Sender: pat...@eris.io.com
Newsgroups: alt.abortion
Subject: Re: Jesus Christ or eternal hell fire.
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Message-ID: <szkbsfn...@eris.io.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:14:31 GMT
shi...@yahoo.com (Ruth Muraya) writes:
>please avoid using foul language when addressing issues relating to
>Jesus Christ else you will surely DIE!!!!.
We all have to face that eventually...why don't you let your alleged savior
speak for himself?
--PLH, I found Jesus! He was buried under the dustbunnies back of the couch
<END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkr9mmcwmu.fsf%40eris.io.com&rnum=1
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: JESUS IS LORD
Date: 1999/07/05
Message-ID: <szkr9mm...@eris.io.com>
Valerie Gould <sgo...@ionet.net> writes:
>"Patrick L. Humphrey" wrote:
[...]
>I am not one of Oral's mindless drones I am an independent Christian who Loves
>Jesus Christ with all my heart mind soul and strength. That is the greatest
>commandment. Your persecution doesn't bother me just shows that I am doing
>something right. And no I wont take it to a religious newsgroups. If you can
>worship satan here I can worship Jesus! IT is time for the Christians to stand
>up and say WE are not going to take it off of satan anymore! I will continue
>to worship my Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ anyway I please. come to Jesus
>before its too late!
You can worship Tinky Winky, for all I care -- but this is Usenet, and idiots
like you don't have a _right_ to clog this newsgroup with your crap, no matter
what you think your alleged deity tells you...
~~End of GOOGLE Excerpt~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkemlks6xl.fsf%40dillinger.io.com&rnum=4
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Tired of All this Jesus Nonsense
Date: 1999/04/16
Message-ID: <szkemlk...@dillinger.io.com>
"millerbeers" <mille...@email.msn.com> writes:
>Patrick L. Humphrey wrote in message ...
>>"In His Service" <knzpe...@uswest.net> writes:
>>>Fury, PLH & prochoice (aka: proabort; prodeath),
:.
>>Sorry, schmuck. I'm pro-choice. Take your religious crap to a religious
>>newsgroup. Meanwhile, follow your death-cult's own advice and beat the dust
>>off your sandals and leave -- you're not wanted or needed here.
:.
>So what is this newsgroup for then? If you don't want to discuss ideas, are
>you all just hanging out here to discuss different ways to abort unborn
>children?
This newsgroup is alt.abortion. It isn't alt.jesus.is.lord, or any other name
that would signify its purpose as being for religious discussions. There are
plenty of those in the alt. and soc. hierarchies, already, so any preachers
are advised to take their babble to a newsgroup where it's at least got _some_
connection with the newsgroup's purpose. Bothering other newsgroups with
their prattling won't win them any converts, but _will_ likely piss off people
to the point where you get the inevitable flamefest.
>What do you mean by "death-cult"?
Well, what would you call a religion that makes such a big deal of its
supposed founder being nailed up and left to die, and crafts such a convoluted
morality that produces such marvels as suffering being deemed virtuous?
--PLH, think I'll stick to more common-sense notions than those
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szken0bxmti.fsf%40bermuda.io.com&rnum=5
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Jesus and homosexuals (was Re: Gays v. Boy Scouts of America)
Date: 1998/03/09
Message-ID: <szken0b...@bermuda.io.com>
"Actually, the way I look at it, if this Jesus fellow died for
our sins, why make his death meaningless by not committing a few of 'em? ;-)
--PLH, just helping some of the more devout churchfolks out"
<END>
Need I say more?
Tavish
~~The Standard Patrick L. Humphrey Style of Reply~~
"I don't condone or oppose the issues you're pathologically obsessed with.
They exist, and you can't stand anyone dissenting from your opinion -- I
don't have to refute you, Fatso. You have to prove your babbling. Please
do so, occasionally. (I'm farther right than you are, but I'm not clinically
insane, like you are. Spot the difference.)" Patrick L. Humphrey 07-11-2003
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=szkadbljamo.fsf_-_%40fnord.io.com&output=gplain
Subject: Re: Scott Bradbury, the Nazi Kook Strikes Again!
From: Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
Date: 11 Jul 2003 11:23:11 -0500
Message-ID: <szkadblja...@fnord.io.com>
>> My Own "Maxim Concerning Debate" <<
From a letter I sent to Liberal/Leftist Radio Talk Show Host Jim Hightower:
"I am tired of seeing people get attacked for speaking the truth and the
hecklers not being able to prove their point other than scorn or ridicule.
Liberals can't refute the truth so all liberals instead attempt to make
the truth bearer into a buffoon hoping to draw the public's attention away from
the message!
I will tell you a secret and I hope that you learn from it! This is my
original- "If I hear something being debated pertaining to a subject that I am
not cognizant of, therefore impartial, I examine the manner of the debate and
conduct. I know who is telling the truth and who is lying by the tactics
employed- the liar always attacks the opposing person and the truth teller
always attacks the opposing premise!"
-Subject: Tavish Maxim Concerning Debate.
-Date: 1997/12/09
-Message-ID: <348ccbc4....@news.smart1.net>
The Socialists/Marxists/Leftists/Liberals or whatever name they choose
to exist under are the primary users of smear and innuendo thus they typically
resort to personal attacks instead of dealing in FACT.