Patrick L. Humphrey wants telephone calls and visits
anon...@remailer.hastio.org
his morbidly obese wife or else he would of not made such info
as this public knowledge.
http://www.io.com/~patrick/address.html
Dale and I can be reached at the following snail mail location:
Patrick & Dale Ann Humphrey
7500 Bellerive #1807
Houston, Texas 77036-3040
http://www.io.com/~patrick/address2.html
How to call us:
Me, at work: I'll let that be known to those I can trust.
Dale and I, at home: (713) 266-7764
(Dale has a line of her own, but it's non-published/non-listed;
those who know us know it, so if you don't know us, don't bother asking.
You're just wasting your time.)
Caveat: My modem is on my line, so don't be too surprised if
it's busy when I'm home -- I'll probably be online. If you get through,
leave a message and if you're not a Usenet kook, a telemarketer, Don Ellis,
or a Scientologist, one of us will return your call. Count on it.
Pictures of me and my morbidly obese wife;
http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html
http://www.io.com/~patrick/6400.html
Does anyone else know of a person who is more of a kook than
Patrick L. Humpboys? Please call him or visit him and see his
morbidly obese wife.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
Lawrence
<anon...@remailer.hastio.org> wrote in message
news:FQ24XKN23772...@anonymous.poster...
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dear Patrick:
This posting of yours struck me as funny. I looked at the subject and saw
only
"Re: Patrick L. Humphrey wants....."
It is 82º F here in NYC today and a while back I was walking by Central Park
and a girl was standing on 59th Street singing and dancing in front of a
boom box the song "What LoLa Wants LoLa Gets".
The heading of your news reminded me of that and made me laugh.
Lawrence
Jeffrey E. Salzberg
anon...@remailer.hastio.org says...
> Please call him or visit him and see his
> morbidly obese wife.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
> The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
> is unverified.
It's pretty pathetic that you feel you have to slam someone's spouse in
a Usenet discussion -- and anonymously, no less.
You must not have any *real* arguments.
Geoff George
anon...@remailer.hastio.org wrote:
>Patrick must of wanted people to call and visit him and see
>his morbidly obese wife or else he would of not made such info
>as this public knowledge.
>
>http://www.io.com/~patrick/address.html
>Dale and I can be reached at the following snail mail location:
>Patrick & Dale Ann Humphrey
>7500 Bellerive #1807
>Houston, Texas 77036-3040
>http://www.io.com/~patrick/address2.html
>How to call us:
>Me, at work: I'll let that be known to those I can trust.
>Dale and I, at home: (713) 266-7764
> (Dale has a line of her own, but it's non-published/non-listed;
>those who know us know it, so if you don't know us, don't bother asking.
>You're just wasting your time.)
> Caveat: My modem is on my line, so don't be too surprised if
>it's busy when I'm home -- I'll probably be online. If you get through,
>leave a message and if you're not a Usenet kook, a telemarketer, Don Ellis,
>or a Scientologist, one of us will return your call. Count on it.
>Pictures of me and my morbidly obese wife;
>http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html
>http://www.io.com/~patrick/6400.html
>
>Does anyone else know of a person who is more of a kook than
>Patrick L. Humpboys? Please call him or visit him and see his
>morbidly obese wife.
>
HUMPHREY,DALE ANN
License number 013494944
Address
7500 BELLERIVE 1807
DOB Dec 21 1951
City/Zip
HOUSTON 77036
Gender Female
Race White
Height 509
Weight 320
Eye color Brown
Hair Brown
Last transaction Date Dec 19 2002
Last transaction Renewal
Dale gained 80 pounds.
Women are known to fudge on their weight too. I think Dale would
tip the scale at an even 350.
I now know why Patrick is so bitter. He is married to a sow he
can't have sex with. Her belly would be big enough to prevent
front entry.
Patrick would need a cock the size of a Budweiser Clydesdale horse
to ass fuck her. Her big buttocks would take a long dick to get
past the flab to penetrate the hole.
Patrick could always take her to a car repair shop and put her
fat ass on the lift and fuck her while standing.
Patrick should consider buying groceries in 100 pound bags at
a feed store to save money. You should of married a human instead
of a sow Humpboys.
knight57
> On 16 Apr 2003 19:27:39 -0000, <FQ24XKN23772...@anonymous.poster>
> anon...@remailer.hastio.org wrote:
>
> >Patrick must of wanted people to call and visit him and see
> >his morbidly obese wife or else he would of not made such info
> >as this public knowledge.
> >
>
Now you're posing as someone else, fatboy?Do you actually think you
are fooling anyone, dumbshit?
<T_A_V_I_S_H>
tar...@indystart.com (knight57) wrote:
Where is your proof JewBoy?
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
<T_A_V_I_S_H>
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>"<T_A_V_I_S_H>" writes:
>
>>On 17 Apr 2003 05:24:37 -0700, <abf0ff5d.03041...@posting.google.com>
>>tar...@indystart.com (knight57) wrote:
>
>>>Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Geoff George) wrote in message news:<L8RW7PV43772...@anonymous.poster>...
>>>> On 16 Apr 2003 19:27:39 -0000, <FQ24XKN23772...@anonymous.poster>
>>>> anon...@remailer.hastio.org wrote:
>
>>>> >Patrick must of wanted people to call and visit him and see
>>>> >his morbidly obese wife or else he would of not made such info
>>>> >as this public knowledge.
:
>>>Now you're posing as someone else, fatboy?Do you actually think you
>>>are fooling anyone, dumbshit?
:
>>Where is your proof JewBoy?
:
>It's obvious you're pathologically stupid, Bradbury, but this is moronic even
>for you -- are you now going to claim that YOU are Don Ellis?
No- I am not BUT you fellow kook passed the blame on to me never the less.
>(Why would you use the same basic English errors that he does?)
>
>--PLH, it's obvious where Bradbury's "proof" is (watch that one go right over
> his head)
Your pal implied I made the post and I challenged him to prove it and now you
come along and contradict your pal BUT you see nothing amiss in your blindness?
You're the one who is stupid and you are the one who is the stalker and a
PEEPING TOM and your own words condemn you as being such Patrick "Stalker"
Humphrey.
I.E.
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Tavish+Shawn+tire+windows&hl=&selm=cloc0v4204ph86rng00u85dmd91tc6f656%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Patrick "The Stalker" Humphrey Makes a Subtle Death Threat
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 20:13:59 -0600
Message-ID: <cloc0v4204ph86rng...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
The above proves that you are a nut case and I would not be suprised if sooner
or later someone blows your head off with a double barrel shotgun if they catch
you peeking into their windows at night!! You are also a kook for bragging about
it too!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkoh53wd3n.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: PATRICK HUMPHREY- HOUSTON LIBERTARIAN, PROCHOICE and watching Dave
Dahlman slit his own throat
Date: 1997/10/06
Message-ID: <szkoh53wd...@pentagon.io.com>
--Patrick L. 'a grandfather to be -- and any congratulations from a
sick little asshole named Peter Nyikos will be returned with a grenade
with a pulled pin' Humphrey
<<Tavish comment: Looks like a threat of violence to me!>>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Bobby Coyle, proof that too much exposure to X-rays is harmful
Date: 1997/07/31
Message-ID: <szk4t9beh...@pentagon.io.com>
You need to clean up the toys in your driveway...
--Patrick L. "Dave can't stand that I know where he lives" Humphrey
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>: Thanks to a gutless bastard in the Houston suburbs named David F.
>: Dahlman, you mean. And I never claimed there was a tire swing in your
>: front yard, liar. Your _neighbor's_ yard, yes -- and that was
>: something like three years ago, too. Are you going to state that your
>: yard is in the same state of being cluttered now as it was three years
>: ago?
>: --Patrick L. "14 days, tick tick tick, heh heh" Humphrey
:
>Tick tick tick? As in a Houston version of the Unibomber?
~~End of Cited Text~~
Regarding your taunt: "--Patrick L. "Dave can't stand that I know where he
lives" Humphrey"- no one likes for a kook like you to know where the live
Patrick because you are a nutcase on the edge or to quote you: "a grenade
with a pulled pin' Humphrey"
Here is real proof of stalking. Everyone notice that Patrick intimidated he
would return!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
Re: Bobby Coyle, proof that too much exposure to X-rays is ...
home page just happen to bear an uncanny resemblance to the fellow out in front
of your listed address when I came down the street one afternoon three weeks ago
talk.politics.misc - 31 Jul 1997 by Patrick L. Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkzpqqqhnl.fsf%40pentagon.io.com
Re: PATRICK HUMPHREY THE LIBERTARIAN STALKER
home page just happen to bear an uncanny resemblance to the fellow out in front
of your listed address when I came down the street one afternoon three weeks ago
houston.general - 10 Aug 1997 by Patrick L. Humphrey
I guess it's just an amazing coincidence, then, that the pictures on
your home page just happen to bear an uncanny resemblance to the
fellow out in front of your listed address when I came down the street
one afternoon three weeks ago...
--Patrick L. 'coming by again in two weeks' Humphrey
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<<Tavish comment: Does not the above prove that Patrick is a stalker and
that he tries to intimidate people? He likes identifying people, fomenting hate
towards them and then letting people know in general how to find said person!
Patrick needs to be taught a lesson he won't forget! Report his stalking to his
employer!>>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
"I don't think so, because you don't resemble me at all...and that
much I know from personal experience, after two weekends ago.
--Patrick L. ?it was a worthwhile 88 miles spent? Humphrey
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Be sure to understand this is about the sixth occasion this squealer
has been to what he presumes to be my home... Rack Jite
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
---Try *fourth* --Patrick L. 'bout time to put on the Spandex and
pedal over that way :-)?Humphrey"
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
The tire swing in front of your house...
--Patrick L. "still pedaling" Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
Thanks to a gutless bastard in the Houston suburbs named David F.
Dahlman, you mean. And I never claimed there was a tire swing in your
front yard, liar. Your _neighbor's_ yard, yes -- and that was
something like three years ago, too. Are you going to state that your
yard is in the same state of being cluttered now as it was three years
ago?--Patrick L. "14 days, tick tick tick, heh heh" Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
I've pedaled by his house three or four times, and one time, just by
dumb luck, he and his family happened to be outside.
--Patrick L. Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=3&ic=1&selm=4i41r5%24obv%40pentagon.io.com
Re: @ Stalking Pat: Evidence don't you, "Shawn"? I've pedaled by his house three
or four times, and one time, just by dumb luck, he and his family happened to be
outside. It's fun to mention that later and watch him foam at the mouth, if you
ask me. talk.politics.misc - 12 Mar 1996 by Patrick L. Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
You lie like a rug, "Shawn". Pointing out that Dahlman lives across
town from me -- so what? ...I have NEVER posted the name on his
mailbox (another interesting claim, since you think his mailbox is on
the street, and it isn't -- no one's is, in that area, and in a LOT of
areas all over Houston), and I pointed out the appearance of his yard
*two years ago*, Get back to me when you can write something
original, "Shawn". Meanwhile, go cower under your bed, since I'm only
37 days away from being in the same city as you.
--Patrick L. "just thought I'd say that" Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkendqxr88.fsf%40xanadu.io.com
--PLH, I'll deal with Shawn on the 30th, heh heh heh
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkiv2uvg9v.fsf%40pentagon.io.com
Better run and hide, S. Shawn. I may be in -your- neighborhood.
--PLH, I've got a Bat Attitude.
<<Tavish comment December 23, 2002: Looks like a threat of violence to me!
Notice the mention of a Bat!?>>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk7meluy9l.fsf%40xanadu.io.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
It's funny, though, that at one time, Jimbo had FOUR phone lines
listed under his name at one address -- and then, all of a
sudden, he's down to ONE line at a different address that is actually
an apartment complex. Yeah, I know a LOT of people who move an entire
family from a house to a cracker-box apartment...--PLH
Looks like you're the stalker Patrick!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkra8oafah.fsf%40bermuda.io.com
Actually, I live on the other side of the Houston area from Dave...and
the shortest possible pedal between where I live and where he lives
would be something like 40 miles. That's one reason I've done it only
a couple of times. (Yes, Dave, the other times I've been by, I drove. :)
Hey, it's good exercise, and it gives Dave the chance to jerk his knee.
--Patrick L. better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit
to Austin :-) Humphrey
<<Doc Tavish comment: Definitely looks like stalking, intimidation, and
harassment to me!>>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&selm=szk7m4tf3bs.fsf_-_%40dillinger.io.com
From: Patrick L. Humphrey (pat...@io.com)
Subject: Re: PATRICK L. HUMPHREY : RICE UNIVERSITY STALKER (so sez S. Shawn)
Date: 1998/04/13
nob...@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) writes:
>In article <szk4szx...@dillinger.io.com>
>Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>In article <1998041119...@basement.replay.com> nob...@REPLAY.COM
>>(Anonymous) writes:
[...]
>>>Answer this question, Patty : If some crazed gunloon puts that name into a
>>>web phone directory, is he going to get directions on how to find the
>>>guy's house?
:
>>Probably...so?
:
>SO WHY IN THE FUCK ARE YOU PUTTING UP A GUY'S NAME WHEN HE HAS BEEN
>ASKING YOU NOT TO FOR FOURTEEN YEARS, YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE!
Because it pisses YOU off, little high-school dropout.
<<Tavish comment: Thus Patrick L. Humphrey shows his real agenda.>>
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Patrick L. Humphrey is definitely mentally disturbed and he proves that he is a
stalker by all the interest he shows in other people's private lives. He has NOT
one bit of respect for other people's privacy and I am sure that it was he who
informed Yale F. Edeiken the make model, and year of the vehicle I drive as well
as its color. STEP ON MY PROPERTY AND MAKE SOME THREATS PATRICK AND FIND OUT HOW
THE LOCAL POLICE TREAT TROUBLEMAKERS.
I posted this at one time and the links are probably still active. Everyone who
knows Patrick L. Humphrey will be able to se he has many of the traits listed!
<<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. - FAIR USE INTENDED>>>
http://www.sccadvasa.org/Stalking.htm
(EXCERPTED)
What is Stalking?
STALKING - pattern of words or conduct that is intended to cause and does cause
the targeted person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, or CSC upon the
person or member of the person's family (reasonable person standard).
HARASSMENT - pattern of intentional substantial and unreason- able intrusion
which causes the targeted person to suffer mental distress (reasonable person
standard). A suspect must be provided notice that contact is unwanted.
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROFILE OF STALKERS
Simple Obsession Stalkers:
Simple obsession stalkers represent 70 to 80% of all stalking cases.
Characteristics include:
1 personality disorders.
2 emotional immaturity, jealousy and extreme insecurity.
3 inability to succeed in relationships by socially-accepted means.
4 dominating and intimidating victims in order to bolster own self-esteem.
5 biggest fear is losing the victim.
6 believing their lives have no worth without the victim.
7 turning to violence in order to control every aspect of the victim's life
STALKING BEHAVIOR PATTERNS AND CYCLES
1 Attempts at intimidation often begin in the form of an unjustified, jealous
and inappropriate intrusion into the victim's life.
2 Contacts become more numerous and intrusive over time, until such conduct
becomes a persistent pattern of harassment.
3 Harassment may escalate to threats
4 In some cases, offenders are even willing to kill their victims and themselves
in a last, desperate attempt to dominate the victim
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
1 visiting or following the victim or victim's family
2 harassing telephone calls, which includes obscene calls and hang-ups
3 sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony
4 trespassing
5 vandalism
6 killing or injuring pets
<<Tavish comment December 23, 2002: My front windows have been broken out twice
(on file with police) [Vandalism], my VIN number to my vehicle has been posted
to the net and it is only obtainable by reading it off the dash board
[Tresspassing], and Patrick makes many comments about my employment etc which I
have not ever made known over the net [visiting or following the victim]>>
<END>
Safety Tips for Stalking Victims
http://www.police.ufl.edu/community_safetytips_stalking.htm
(EXCERPTED)
What Can I Do?
While a stalking victim may not be in imminent danger, the potential always
exists. Making a contingency plan may help. Suggested items to include in such a
plan are:
Take all threats seriously.
Travel with others or inform a friend of your departure and expected arrival
times.
Report all suspicious activity to law enforcement.
Keep notes, answering machine tapes or other items that document the stalkers
actions.
Alert critical people, who may be useful in formulating a contingency plan, such
as: law enforcement, employers, family, friends, or neighbors, and security
personnel.
Preventive Measures:
Install solid core doors with dead bolts on all exterior doors of your home.
Install adequate outside lighting.
Trim back bushes and vegetation around residence.
Maintain an unlisted phone number.
Notify local law enforcement, but also keep a written log of harassing calls and
any answering machine tapes of calls with the stalker's voice and messages.
Treat any threats as legitimate and inform law enforcement immediately.
Vary travel routes, stores and restaurants, etc., which are regularly used.
Limit time walking, jogging, alone etc.
Inform a trusted neighbor or coworker about the situation. Provide them with a
photo or description of the suspect and any possible vehicles he/she may drive.
If residing in an apartment with an on-site property manager, provide the
manager with a picture of the suspect.
Have co-workers screen all calls and visitors.
<END>
http://www.ualberta.ca/~uasac/Stalking.htm
(EXCERPTED)
Although it is tempting to dismiss stalking behavior in the hopes it will stop,
stalking can be a very serious and potentially dangerous offence. Even without
the possible threat of violence, stalkers can instill fear and anxiety in those
who they stalk, and can completely disrupt someone's life. Please remember that
if you are being stalked, it is not your fault in any way.
So far research has been unsuccessful in revealing what exactly leads someone to
become a stalker, and what the research has shown is that internal
characteristics of the stalkers themselves are the only factors that can be used
to form a profile of a potential stalker. It is possible to write a profile of
someone who is likely to be a stalker, but it is not possible to write a profile
of someone who is likely to be a stalking victim. Therefore, once again, if you
are being stalked it is not your fault in any way; anyone can be stalked for any
reason.
What is Stalking Behavior?
Stalking has been referred to as a "building block crime" because it usually
starts with small incidents that can get more and more serious. These incidents
can include such behaviors as:
repeated phone calls, emails, or letters
following, watching, spying, and tracking someone
<<Tavish comment December 23, 2002: Many people can factually accuse Patrick
of the above.>>
stealing from someone's property (including mail)
vandalizing someone's property
<<Tavish comment December 23, 2002: My windows have been broken out twice in the
same time period Patrick was having fixations on me and acting aggressive
in USENET.>>
threatening someone and/or their loved ones
assaulting or threatening to assault someone verbally, physically, or sexually
having friends or acquaintances do any of the above for them
<END>
(EXCERPTED)
Be Alert To Common Traits of Stalkers
Stalkers display an obsessive personality.
They are not just interested in, but totally obsessed with the person they are
pursuing. Their every waking thought centers on the victim, and every plan the
stalker has for the future involves the victim.
Along with obsessive thinking, they also display other psychological or
personality problems and disorders. They may suffer from erotomania, paranoia,
schizophrenia, and delusional thinking. According to Professor R. Meloy, "these
stalkers have rigid personalities and maladaptive styles. These disorders in
themselves are very stable and not treatable." There are drugs to treat certain
specific mental disorders, but stalkers, when given the choice, seldom continue
with their medication or treatment.
Stalkers are above average in intelligence and are usually smarter than the run
of the mill person with mental problems.
They will go to great lengths to obtain information about their victims or to
find victims who have secretly moved. They have been known to hack into
computers, tap telephone lines, take jobs at public utilities that allow them
access to the victims or information about the victims, and even to travel
thousands of miles and spend thousands of dollars to gain information about or
find their victims. Stalkers many times use their intelligence to throw others
off their trail.
Few stalkers can see how their actions are hurting others.
They display other sociopathic thinking in that they cannot learn from
experience, and they don't believe society's rules apply to them. Most stalkers
don't think they're really threatening, intimidating, or even stalking someone
else.
Stalkers, like rapists, want absolute control over their victims. They don't
regard what they're doing as a crime, or even wrong.
Stalkers many times have a mean streak and will become violent when frustrated.
How violent? Often deadly.
The above traits remind us that much of stalking involves harassment and
annoyance, but never forget that stalkers can also be extraordinarily dangerous.
Although the majority of cases do not end in murder or grave bodily injury,
enough do every year that victims should never brush aside the possibility.
Victims of stalking should never take the crime lightly....
Look carefully again at the traits below and be wary if someone seems to fit
these.
1. Won't take no for an answer
2. Has an obsessive personality
3. Above average intelligence
4. No or few personal relationships
5. Lack of embarrassment or discomfort at actions
6. Low self esteem
7. Sociopathic thinking
8. Has a mean streak
E.S.I.A.
End Stalking In America, Inc.
A Nonprofit Organization
2015 N. Dobson Rd., Suite 4-222
Chandler, Arizona 85224
<END>
Tavish
mad_kow
> his morbidly obese wife or else he would of not made such info
> as this public knowledge.
>
>
> Does anyone else know of a person who is more of a kook than
> Patrick L. Humpboys? Please call him or visit him and see his
> morbidly obese wife.
>
Whoa! My baloney detection kit just went Kablooey, thanks to a double
ad hominem attack :(
My dear anonymous poster, what exactly does any of this have to do
with scientology?
Mad Kow
<T_A_V_I_S_H>
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Subject: Re: Bradbury the Stalker still stupid, no one impressed
>References: <L8RW7PV43772...@anonymous.poster>
><abf0ff5d.03041...@posting.google.com>
><df0u9v4dlic5la03j...@4ax.com>
><szkof34kh...@hagbard.io.com>
><kv3u9v8j5ngjn6fcm...@4ax.com>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
On 17 Apr 2003 19:44:27 -0500, <szkwuhslj...@fnord.io.com> Patrick
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>"<T_A_V_I_S_H>" writes:
>
>[you see one 470-line Bradkook rant, you've pretty much seen 'em all]
You can't exactly refute your own words can you Patrick?
You are in denial and I restore the hard hitting truths you don't want to face.
You instead project your stalker psychosis on other people in order to not deal
with your psychotic behavior. I don't base my observation on my opinion and I am
not making (as you continually do) personal attacks-- your own words show you
for what you are and YES-- I restored the news groups you deleted too!
<START>
I.E.
The above proves that you are a nut case and I would not be surprised if sooner
~~End of Cited Text~~
nob...@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) writes:
[...]
http://www.sccadvasa.org/Stalking.htm
(EXCERPTED)
What is Stalking?
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
<END>
(EXCERPTED)
What Can I Do?
Take all threats seriously.
Preventive Measures:
Install adequate outside lighting.
<END>
http://www.ualberta.ca/~uasac/Stalking.htm
(EXCERPTED)
What is Stalking Behavior?
<END>
(EXCERPTED)
How violent? Often deadly.
<END>
Tavish
<STOP>
>Got proof OTHER than in a bottle, Bradbury?
>
>--PLH, obviously not
Another ad hominem attack. Care to offer proof I am a drunk or even a drinker?
I did produce proof and it is included above.
Tavish
Beaver Cleaver
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>[560 lines of Bradshit flushed, this time]
---
"It takes no thought whatsoever, on the other hand, to flame someone for
this, rather than present a rational argument, backed by verifiable evidence.
Once again, [you] display [your] preference for the cheap shot over the
reasoned statement." -- Jeffrey G. Brown
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=jeff_brown-1111961218190001%40news.zippo.com&rnum=6
Message-ID: <jeff_brown-11...@news.zippo.com>
knight57
> On 17 Apr 2003 21:20:06 -0500, <szky928...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
> <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >[560 lines of Bradshit flushed, this time]
>
> ---
> "It takes no thought whatsoever, on the other hand, to flame someone for
> this, rather than present a rational argument, backed by verifiable evidence.
> Once again, [you] display [your] preference for the cheap shot over the
> reasoned statement." -- Jeffrey G. Brown
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=jeff_brown-1111961218190001%40news.zippo.com&rnum=6
> Message-ID: <jeff_brown-11...@news.zippo.com>
>
>
Note:The above bit of hypocrisy was posted by Scott Bradbury, who
calls people "vermin", "filthy kike", "bastard","shyster" and accuses
them of being thieves and tax evaders without evidence to support the
charges.
Bruno
>T-A-V-I-S-H<
tar...@indystart.com (knight57) wrote:
>Note:The above bit of hypocrisy was posted by Scott Bradbury, who
>calls people "vermin", "filthy kike", "bastard","shyster" and accuses
>them of being thieves and tax evaders without evidence to support the
>charges.
The hypocrite is YOU! I call your kind what they are AFTER I have had my fill of
their continual ad hominem attacks! You are the ones who initiate it and you are
the ones who continually reply to my posts with ad hominem attacks YET you want
to hold me to standards you, yourselves, don't honor-- it is YOU and YOURS who
are the quintessential hypocrites.
As for me being a stalker I challenge you to show posts where I have done to
anyone what Patrick L. Humphrey is documented as doing! Are you up to it
hypocrite? Try to prove I have been a Peeping Tom or that I try to intimidate
people by repeatedly going by their residences and describing details about
their homes etc. in USENET postings. Are you up to it liar and hypocrite?
Here is but a pittance of what I have on "Patrick The Stalker":
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Tavish+Shawn+tire+windows&hl=&selm=cloc0v4204ph86rng00u85dmd91tc6f656%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Patrick "The Stalker" Humphrey Makes a Subtle Death Threat
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 20:13:59 -0600
Message-ID: <cloc0v4204ph86rng...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
The above proves that Patrick is a nut case and I would not be surprised if
sooner or later someone blows his head off with a double barrel shotgun if they
catch him peeking into their windows at night!! He is also a kook for bragging
about it and making light of it too! Do you want to deny the above behavior is
abnormal and what a mentally unbalanced person would do?
Here is what some experts say about YOUR pal's behavior:
http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/10.28/news.peeping.html
Voyeurism at root of Peeping Tom incidents
CRIME: Cases uncommon on campus; recent arrest one of seven since 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Linh Tat Daily Bruin Contributor Although everyone has heard the term
"Peeping Tom" before, most people may still be in the dark when it comes to
understanding the nature of this criminal offense. Many people may label a
person who secretly observes another undressing or in the nude as a Peeping Tom,
but they do not always consider that those who repeatedly commit this offense
may suffer from a psychological disorder.... <END>
IOW your sidekick has a mental disorder and there are many proofs if you look in
the GOOGLE return above!
More about your pal being a self confessed Peeping Tom:
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.html
...In November 1997, after reviewing police reports that implicated petitioner
as a suspect in a "Peeping Tom" incident that occurred in the vicinity of the
rape, NCIS reopened its investigation. Pet. App. 23a. Thereafter, the NCIS
office in Hawaii asked NCIS Special Agent John McNutt, assigned to the NCIS
office in Memphis, Tennessee, to interrogate petitioner, who was living in
Memphis, and to ask him to provide NCIS with a sample of his blood. Id. at 24a.
After learning that petitioner was receiving medical treatment at the
Veteran's Administration (VA) Hospital in Memphis, McNutt contacted the VA and
was allowed to review petitioner's medical records. Pet. App. 24a. During that
review, McNutt learned that petitioner was being treated for diabetes and a
mental disorder.... <END>
Notice Peeping Tom and mental disorder were used in the police report? Notice
the source?
More proof Patrick L. Humphrey is a potentially dangerous psychotic:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkoh53wd3n.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: PATRICK HUMPHREY- HOUSTON LIBERTARIAN, PROCHOICE and watching Dave
Dahlman slit his own throat
Date: 1997/10/06
Message-ID: <szkoh53wd...@pentagon.io.com>
--Patrick L. 'a grandfather to be -- and any congratulations from a
sick little asshole named Peter Nyikos will be returned with a grenade
with a pulled pin' Humphrey
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkendqxr88.fsf%40xanadu.io.com
--PLH, I'll deal with Shawn on the 30th, heh heh heh
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szkiv2uvg9v.fsf%40pentagon.io.com
Better run and hide, S. Shawn. I may be in -your- neighborhood.
--PLH, I've got a Bat Attitude.
<<Tavish comment December 23, 2002: Looks like a threat of violence to me!
Notice the mention of a Bat!? Notice the other implied threats from a self
confessed Peeping Tom (which is a recognized mental disorder!!)>>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk4t9behbm.fsf_-_%40pentagon.io.com
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Bobby Coyle, proof that too much exposure to X-rays is harmful
Date: 1997/07/31
Message-ID: <szk4t9beh...@pentagon.io.com>
You need to clean up the toys in your driveway...
--Patrick L. "Dave can't stand that I know where he lives" Humphrey
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>: Thanks to a gutless bastard in the Houston suburbs named David F.
>: Dahlman, you mean. And I never claimed there was a tire swing in your
>: front yard, liar. Your _neighbor's_ yard, yes -- and that was
>: something like three years ago, too. Are you going to state that your
>: yard is in the same state of being cluttered now as it was three years
>: ago?
>: --Patrick L. "14 days, tick tick tick, heh heh" Humphrey
:
>Tick tick tick? As in a Houston version of the Unibomber?
~~End of Cited Text~~
Regarding Patrick's taunt: "--Patrick L. "Dave can't stand that I know where he
lives" Humphrey"- no one likes for a kook like Patrick to know where they live
because Patrick is a nutcase on the edge or to quote Patrick: "a grenade
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=szk7meluy9l.fsf%40xanadu.io.com
nob...@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) writes:
[...]
informed Yale F. Edeiken the make, model, and year of the vehicle I drive as
well as its color.
Now you can either reply with ad hominem attack which will prove you are a loser
(which is what you will do) OR you can show evidence I have done what Patrick
has done. Are you up to it or are you going to shoot off your big mouth again?
Tavish
>Bruno
>T-A-V-I-S-H<
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>--PLH, the wind's about to change
That makes ther third subtle threat you have made today you nut case.
Don't push your luck nut boy!
---Undeniable proof Patrick "Peeping Tom" Humphrey has a mental disorder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
Here is what some experts say about Patrick's behavior:
http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/10.28/news.peeping.html
Voyeurism at root of Peeping Tom incidents
CRIME: Cases uncommon on campus; recent arrest one of seven since 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Linh Tat Daily Bruin Contributor Although everyone has heard the term
"Peeping Tom" before, most people may still be in the dark when it comes to
understanding the nature of this criminal offense. Many people may label a
person who secretly observes another undressing or in the nude as a Peeping Tom,
but they do not always consider that those who repeatedly commit this offense
may suffer from a psychological disorder.... <END>
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.html
...In November 1997, after reviewing police reports that implicated petitioner
as a suspect in a "Peeping Tom" incident that occurred in the vicinity of the
rape, NCIS reopened its investigation. Pet. App. 23a. Thereafter, the NCIS
office in Hawaii asked NCIS Special Agent John McNutt, assigned to the NCIS
office in Memphis, Tennessee, to interrogate petitioner, who was living in
Memphis, and to ask him to provide NCIS with a sample of his blood. Id. at 24a.
After learning that petitioner was receiving medical treatment at the
Veteran's Administration (VA) Hospital in Memphis, McNutt contacted the VA and
was allowed to review petitioner's medical records. Pet. App. 24a. During that
review, McNutt learned that petitioner was being treated for diabetes and a
mental disorder.... <END>
Did everyone notice "Peeping Tom" and mental disorder were used in the police
report? Notice the source?
Tavish