Poor ol' gutless Scottie -- so low, he has to reach *up* to touch rock bottom
Jeffrey G. Brown
In article <01bd06bb$9efbe040$9c431ed1@msn-net>, Scott "I'm not Scott
Bradbury!" Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
> I have already submitted Allan
> Matthews' and Tim Brown's names to this organization that seeks to bring
> baby killers to justice.
The site that Bradbury has so bravely (and undoubtedly anonymously)
submitted the names of individuals who have committed the dreadful crime of
disagreeing with him is looking specifically for:
> 1) Persons who perform abortion (doctors, nurses, etc.);
> [...deletia...]
> 2) Persons who own or direct abortion clinics;
>
> 3) Persons who provide protection to abortion clinics (security guards,
> escorts, law enforcement officers, etc.); and
>
> 4) Judges and politicians who pass or uphold laws authorizing
> child-killing or oppressing pro-life activists.
Let us leave aside for the moment the question of whether any organization
has a right to publicize the names of individuals as being guilty of
actions not defined as crimes, presumably in the hope that vigilante action
will be taken against said individuals. Perhaps poor ol' gutless Scottie
can provide us with solid, verifiable evidence that either Mr. Matthews or
Mr. Brown actually fall into one of the four categories above.
I fully expect that the best he'll be able to do is to cite posts in which
Mr. Matthews or Mr. Brown express support for a woman's right to an
abortion. One of the basic principles that our society is founded on is
that individuals have the right to express any opinion they wish. Poor ol'
gutless Scottie, it seems, has decided that this pronciple need not apply
to those who dare to contradict him in his quest to blame da Jooooos for
everything he doesn't like in the world.
Of course, should anything untoward actually happen to either Allan
Matthews or Tim Brown, there is now no doubt that the investigation would
eventually lead to poor ol' gutless Scott Bradbury of Houston, TX. I doubt
he has friends at Phoenix.Net with enough clout to defy a subpoena.
JGB
=====================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
"What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
John Brown
Jeffrey G. Brown <jgb...@earthlink.net> wrote in article
<jeff_brown-ya024080...@news.zippo.com>...
> In article <01bd06bb$9efbe040$9c431ed1@msn-net>, Scott "I'm not Scott
> Bradbury!" Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
> > I have already submitted Allan
> > Matthews' and Tim Brown's names to this organization that seeks
> > to bring baby killers to justice.
> The site that Bradbury has so bravely (and undoubtedly anonymously)
> submitted the names of individuals who have committed the dreadful
> crime of disagreeing with him is looking specifically for:
>
> > 1) Persons who perform abortion (doctors, nurses, etc.);
>
> > [...deletia...]
>
> > 2) Persons who own or direct abortion clinics;
> >
> > 3) Persons who provide protection to abortion clinics
> > (security guards, escorts, law enforcement officers, etc.);
> > and
> > 4) Judges and politicians who pass or uphold laws authorizing
> > child-killing or oppressing pro-life activists.
>
> Let us leave aside for the moment the question of whether any
> organization has a right to publicize the names of individuals as
> being guilty of actions not defined as crimes, presumably in the
> hope that vigilante action will be taken against said individuals.
You mean like Nizkor, Hate Watch and all the lefty groups do to
people they don't agree with? Or like Eric Hoffer publishing the
Phelps Family members addresses? You mean stuff like this
asshole?
> Perhaps poor ol' gutless Scottie can provide us with solid,
> verifiable evidence that either Mr. Matthews or
> Mr. Brown actually fall into one of the four categories above.
>
> I fully expect that the best he'll be able to do is to cite posts in
> which Mr. Matthews or Mr. Brown express support for a woman's
> right to an abortion.
> One of the basic principles that our society is founded on is
> that individuals have the right to express any opinion they wish.
> Poor ol' gutless Scottie, it seems, has decided that this pronciple
> need not apply to those who dare to contradict him in his quest
> to blame da Jooooos for everything he doesn't like in the world.
>
> Of course, should anything untoward actually happen to either Allan
> Matthews or Tim Brown, there is now no doubt that the investigation would
> eventually lead to poor ol' gutless Scott Bradbury of Houston, TX.
> I doubt he has friends at Phoenix.Net with enough clout to defy a
> subpoena.
The organization does not advocate violence and it seeks to bring about the
justice using the established, though restored, judicial system. As for
putting Matthews and Brown on their list so what? It pisses you off to
think that an organization would keep files on them? Now you know how it
feels to have files generated and kept on private citizens. Are you now
claiming that Nizkor has a special sanctity over the group that I posted?
You have been advocating a vigilante action against me with your rants
about making me responsible for my words and giving out my private
unfiltered e-mail address. I have received death threats on account of you
and they were sent to the local FBI office in Houston, Texas. If you wish
to call my hand, I say any time you wish you son of a bitch! I won't be
intimidated by the likes of you!
Sir John Winslow Brown
For those wishing to visit the group that numbnuts deleted from the post:
(You will see that they do not promote violence but Jeffrey wants you to
think otherwise!)
click: http://christiangallery.com/prolifeva/deadbaby.html
> JGB jgb...@earthlink.net
Jeffrey G. Brown
In article <01bd06cf$11149380$9c431ed1@msn-net>, Scott "I'm not Scott
Bradbury!" Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
> Jeffrey G. Brown <jgb...@earthlink.net> wrote in article
> <jeff_brown-ya024080...@news.zippo.com>...
> > In article <01bd06bb$9efbe040$9c431ed1@msn-net>, Scott "I'm not Scott
> > Bradbury!" Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
>
> > > I have already submitted Allan
> > > Matthews' and Tim Brown's names to this organization that seeks to bring
> > > baby killers to justice.
> >
> > The site that Bradbury has so bravely (and undoubtedly anonymously)
> > submitted the names of individuals who have committed the dreadful crime of
> > disagreeing with him is looking specifically for:
> >
> > > 1) Persons who perform abortion (doctors, nurses, etc.);
> >
> > > [...deletia...]
> >
> > > 2) Persons who own or direct abortion clinics;
> > >
> > > 3) Persons who provide protection to abortion clinics (security guards,
> > > escorts, law enforcement officers, etc.); and
> > >
> > > 4) Judges and politicians who pass or uphold laws authorizing
> > > child-killing or oppressing pro-life activists.
> >
> > Let us leave aside for the moment the question of whether any organization
> > has a right to publicize the names of individuals as being guilty of
> > actions not defined as crimes, presumably in the hope that vigilante action
> > will be taken against said individuals. Perhaps poor ol' gutless Scottie
> > can provide us with solid, verifiable evidence that either Mr. Matthews or
> > Mr. Brown actually fall into one of the four categories above.
Note that poor ol' gutless Scottie carefully avoided this question...
> [...deletia...]
> The organization does not advocate violence...
False. From the Pro-Life Virginia web site that poor ol' gutless Scottie
has been trumpeting:
The Defensive Action Statement (From the Defenders of the Defenders of
Life)
We the undersigned, declare the justice of taking all godly action
necessary, including the use of force, to defend innocent human life
(born and unborn). We proclaim that whatever force is legitimate to
defend the life of a born child is legitimate to defend the life of an
unborn child.
> [...deletia...]
Rev. Donald Spitz- Director, Pro-Life Virginia, Chesapeake, Virginia
See: <http://www.christiangallery.com/prolifeva/homepg2.html#defense>.
> As for
> putting Matthews and Brown on their list so what? It pisses you off to
> think that an organization would keep files on them? Now you know how it
> feels to have files generated and kept on private citizens. Are you now
> claiming that Nizkor has a special sanctity over the group that I posted?
Nope -- because Nizkor does not keep files on 'private citizens'. It merely
archives the words written by individuals who have chosen to publish them
on the public Internet. That no more qualifies as 'keeping files on private
citizens' than does the archiving, by the local public library, of
newspapers containing letters to the editor written by private citizens.
> You have been advocating a vigilante action against me with your rants
> about making me responsible for my words and giving out my private
> unfiltered e-mail address.
Correction: Poor ol' gutless Scottie himself published his own 'private
unfiltered e-mail address' on Usenet -- at least five times.
If poor ol' gutless Scottie can find a single post in which I have
specifically 'advocat[ed] a vigilante action against [him]' -- a post that
he himself did not forge, that is -- let him cite it.
> I have received death threats on account of you
> and they were sent to the local FBI office in Houston, Texas. If you wish
> to call my hand, I say any time you wish you son of a bitch!
"Call my hand"?
Obviously, poor ol' gutless Scottie is under the impression that the game
he is playing is called poker. Somebody tell him that the only game that
bigots & racists like he can play is 'Go Fish'.
> I won't be intimidated by the likes of you!
People who "won't be intimidated" generally aren't afraid of taking
responsibility for their own words and actions. Poor ol' gutless Scottie
is.
John Winslow Brown
Jeffrey G. Brown <jgb...@earthlink.net> wrote in article
<jeff_brown-ya024080...@news.zippo.com>...
> In article <01bd06bb$9efbe040$9c431ed1@msn-net>, Scott "I'm not Scott
> Bradbury!" Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
> > I have already submitted Allan
> > Matthews' and Tim Brown's names to this organization that seeks
> > to bring baby killers to justice.
> The site that Bradbury has so bravely (and undoubtedly anonymously)
> submitted the names of individuals who have committed the dreadful
> crime of disagreeing with him is looking specifically for:
>
> > 1) Persons who perform abortion (doctors, nurses, etc.);
>
> > [...deletia...]
>
> > 2) Persons who own or direct abortion clinics;
> >
> > 3) Persons who provide protection to abortion clinics
> > (security guards, escorts, law enforcement officers, etc.);
> > and
> > 4) Judges and politicians who pass or uphold laws authorizing
> > child-killing or oppressing pro-life activists.
>
> Let us leave aside for the moment the question of whether any
> organization has a right to publicize the names of individuals as
> being guilty of actions not defined as crimes, presumably in the
> hope that vigilante action will be taken against said individuals.
You mean like Nizkor, Hate Watch and all the lefty groups do to
people they don't agree with? Or like Eric Hoffer publishing the
Phelps Family members addresses? You mean stuff like this
asshole?
> Perhaps poor ol' gutless Scottie can provide us with solid,
> verifiable evidence that either Mr. Matthews or
> Mr. Brown actually fall into one of the four categories above.
>
> I fully expect that the best he'll be able to do is to cite posts in
> which Mr. Matthews or Mr. Brown express support for a woman's
> right to an abortion.
> One of the basic principles that our society is founded on is
> that individuals have the right to express any opinion they wish.
> Poor ol' gutless Scottie, it seems, has decided that this pronciple
> need not apply to those who dare to contradict him in his quest
> to blame da Jooooos for everything he doesn't like in the world.
>
> Of course, should anything untoward actually happen to either Allan
> Matthews or Tim Brown, there is now no doubt that the investigation would
> eventually lead to poor ol' gutless Scott Bradbury of Houston, TX.
> I doubt he has friends at Phoenix.Net with enough clout to defy a
> subpoena.
The organization does not advocate violence and it seeks to bring
about the justice using the established, though restored, judicial
system. As for putting Matthews and Brown on their list so what? It
pisses you off to think that an organization would keep files on them?
Now you know how it feels to have files generated and kept on private
citizens. Are you now claiming that Nizkor has a special sanctity over
the group that I posted?
You have been advocating a vigilante action against me with your rants
about making me responsible for my words and giving out my private
unfiltered e-mail address. I have received death threats on account of
you and they were sent to the local FBI office in Houston, Texas. If
you wish to call my hand, I say any time you wish you son of a bitch!
I won't be intimidated by the likes of you!
Sir John Winslow Brown
Jeffrey G. Brown
In article <3498a565....@news.flash.net>, Scott "I'm not Scott
Bradbury!" Bradbury (phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
> Jeffrey G. Brown <jgb...@earthlink.net> wrote in article
> <jeff_brown-ya024080...@news.zippo.com>...
> [...deletia...]
> You mean like Nizkor, Hate Watch and all the lefty groups do to
> people they don't agree with?
Poor ol' gutless Scottie hasn't provided any evidence that either Nizkor or
Hate Watch "publicize the names of individuals as being guilty of actions
not defined as crimes". As we've seen all too many times, the insinuations
that poor ol' gutless Scottie likes to use in place of evidence rarely bear
any recognizable correspondence to reality.
> [...deletia...]
> The organization does not advocate violence and it seeks to bring
> about the justice using the established, though restored, judicial
> system.
That's already been exposed as a lie. Poor ol' gutless Scottie still
confuses repetition with proof.