Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Received Via Anon-Mail: DALE ANN HUMPHREY

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Apr 20, 2003, 3:58:24 PM4/20/03
to
I haven't seen this posted so I will do so now.

Tavish

E-mailed to me:

Return-Path: <m...@medea.x6.aarg.net>
Received: from medea.x6.aarg.net ([66.241.88.176])
by emu (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1914QT2dd3NZFnx0
for <xxx...@ix.netcom.com>; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 05:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from medea.x.aarg.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by medea.x6.aarg.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h33DXqTj006131;
Sun, 20 Apr 2003 05:33:52 -0800
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 05:33:50 -0800
From: Medea <anon...@medea.x6.aarg.net>
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <ab...@medea.x6.aarg.net>.
To: xxx...@ix.netcom.com
Subject: DALE ANN HUMPHREY
Message-ID: <c1834b2c5efd4435...@medea.x6.aarg.net>

FBI psychological profilers state in their findings many sexual
deviants such as child molesters, voyeurs, submissive male homosexuals
etc often pick as a spouse a strong, matronly, and domineering woman as a
marital mate who fits the stereotype of being just like the girl daddy
married. Patrick Humphrey's mother is a very obese woman raised on deep
fat fried foods in the Kentucky mountains.
Patrick's choice of a very obese woman fits the profile criteria
and Patrick married Dale Ann after she reached _full blossom_.
Dale Ann Humphrey was already very obese when Patrick married the same
type of gal who married dear old daddy.
The following data on Dale Ann Humphrey was obtained from a
database used by private investigators and it came from the State of
Texas Department of Public Safety - Department of Motor Vehicle Records;
Driver's License Registrations. One need only to Copy 'n' Paste the
following text into their favorite text editor and save the transfer
as _dale.htm_ and then open it as an HTM type document to see
Dale Ann Humphrey's driver's license information and verify she is an
over weight female;

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!-- saved from
url=(0218)http://www3.publicdata.com/cgi-win/pd.exe/Detail?db=txdl&rec=13494944
-->
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>PublicData.Com [ Texas Driver Detail ]</TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2300.1000" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<CENTER></CENTER> <H4><IMG alt=* border=0 height=13
width=13>Texas Driver Detail</H4>
<CENTER>
<P>
<TABLE border=5>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD colSpan=3 noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue
size=-1><I>Name</I></FONT><BR>HUMPHREY,DALE ANN</TD>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue size=-1><I>License
number</I></FONT><BR>013494944</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD colSpan=2 noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue
size=-1><I>Address</I></FONT><BR>7500 BELLERIVE 1807</TD>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue size=-1><I>DOB</I></FONT><BR>
Dec 21 1951</TD>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue
size=-1><I>Class</I></FONT><BR></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD colSpan=2 noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue
size=-1><I>City/Zip</I></FONT><BR>HOUSTON 77036</TD>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue
size=-1><I>Gender</I></FONT><BR>Female</TD>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue
size=-1><I>Race</I></FONT><BR>White</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue
size=-1><I>Height</I></FONT><BR>509</TD>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue
size=-1><I>Weight</I></FONT><BR>320</TD>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue size=-1><I>Eye
color</I></FONT><BR>Brown</TD>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue
size=-1><I>Hair</I></FONT><BR>Brown</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue size=-1><I>Last transaction
date</I></FONT><BR>Dec 19 2002</TD>
<TD colSpan=3 noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue size=-1><I>Last
transaction</I></FONT><BR>Adjustment</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD colSpan=4 noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue size=-1><I>Above
information as provided by state - below is our
annotations</I></FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD colSpan=2 noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue size=-1><I>
Address (click to find others)</I></FONT><BR><A

href="http://www3.publicdata.com/cgi-win/pd.exe/Search?Type=Zip&amp;txdl=1&amp;p1=77036304057&amp;dlstate=TX&amp;id=">
7500 Bellerive Dr Apt 1807</A></TD>
<TD colSpan=2 noWrap vAlign=top><FONT color=blue size=-1><I>
City/State/Zip (click to find others)</I></FONT><BR><A

href="http://www3.publicdata.com/cgi-win/pd.exe/Search?Type=Zip&amp;txdl=1&amp;p1=770363040&amp;dlstate=TX&amp;id=">
Houston , TX 77036-3040</A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER></P></BODY>
</HTML>

______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

Jeffrey E. Salzberg

unread,
Apr 20, 2003, 4:21:27 PM4/20/03
to
In article <0nu5av4v6s5er8f3l...@4ax.com>,
Eddie_...@mayfield.net says...

> Subject: DALE ANN HUMPHREY

Once again, you prove that you're not man enough to deal with Patrick
one-on-one. You're pathetic.

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Apr 20, 2003, 4:26:07 PM4/20/03
to
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 20:21:27 GMT, <MPG.190ccb34b...@news.verizon.net>
Jeffrey E. Salzberg <jeff.s...@verizon.net> wrote:

>Once again, you prove that you're not man enough to deal with Patrick
>one-on-one.

Once again I prove I do deal with Patrick one on one. He makes "Fat" remarks and
then I give him a standard to judge by seeing how he has never seen me and
besides he has already confirmed his wife approves of his activity and is aware
of it! You don't want double standards do you? Every time that bastard cuts
loose with a "Fat" insult I will remind him what he is married to which I will
remind you now:
<"Thar she blows-- Dale the Whale" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>

Now stick it where the sun doesn't shine you hypocrite Zhid!

Tavish
---Undeniable proof Patrick "Peeping Tom" Humphrey has a mental disorder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey

Here is what some experts say about Patrick's behavior:

http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/10.28/news.peeping.html
Voyeurism at root of Peeping Tom incidents
CRIME: Cases uncommon on campus; recent arrest one of seven since 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Linh Tat Daily Bruin Contributor Although everyone has heard the term
"Peeping Tom" before, most people may still be in the dark when it comes to
understanding the nature of this criminal offense. Many people may label a
person who secretly observes another undressing or in the nude as a Peeping Tom,
but they do not always consider that those who repeatedly commit this offense
may suffer from a psychological disorder.... <END>

http://www.google.com/search?q=psychiatric+disorder+%22Peeping+Tom%22&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&as_qdr=all&start=20&sa=N

http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.html
...In November 1997, after reviewing police reports that implicated petitioner
as a suspect in a "Peeping Tom" incident that occurred in the vicinity of the
rape, NCIS reopened its investigation. Pet. App. 23a. Thereafter, the NCIS
office in Hawaii asked NCIS Special Agent John McNutt, assigned to the NCIS
office in Memphis, Tennessee, to interrogate petitioner, who was living in
Memphis, and to ask him to provide NCIS with a sample of his blood. Id. at 24a.
After learning that petitioner was receiving medical treatment at the
Veteran's Administration (VA) Hospital in Memphis, McNutt contacted the VA and
was allowed to review petitioner's medical records. Pet. App. 24a. During that
review, McNutt learned that petitioner was being treated for diabetes and a
mental disorder.... <END>

Did everyone notice "Peeping Tom" and mental disorder were used in the police
report? Notice the source?

Sara Salzman

unread,
Apr 20, 2003, 5:57:53 PM4/20/03
to
In article <0nu5av4v6s5er8f3l...@4ax.com>,
Eddie Haskell <Eddie_...@mayfield.net> wrote:

> I haven't seen this posted so I will do so now.
>
> Tavish
>

Scott:

If anything happens to Patrick's wife because of this information you
have posted, you will be responsible for it, and I will make sure the
authorities know about it. You should be ashamed of yourself. Everyone
calls everyone else "fat" all the time. You've called me a pig, and made
all kinds of pig-noises at me. I'm a grown-up, I have ignored it.

Are you really so immature and thin-skinned that you can't take a little
taunting?

Sara

--
If Ernst Zundel is a refugee, Daffy Duck is Albert Einstein. Some
propositions are so ludicrous that they are a betrayal of common
sense and human dignity if allowed a moment's oxygen.
- REX MURPHY, The Globe and Mail

Patrick Humphrey

unread,
Apr 20, 2003, 8:49:33 PM4/20/03
to

>> Subject: DALE ANN HUMPHREY

You know that, I know that -- but Bradbury? He's a kook. He can't do
anything else.

--PLH, it'd be appreciated if he'd quit being so agggressive in demonstrating
it, though

Patrick Humphrey

unread,
Apr 20, 2003, 8:53:03 PM4/20/03
to
Coward R. Scott Bradbury <Eddie_...@mayfield.net> writes:

>On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 20:21:27 GMT, <MPG.190ccb34b...@news.verizon.net>
>Jeffrey E. Salzberg <jeff.s...@verizon.net> wrote:

>>Once again, you prove that you're not man enough to deal with Patrick
>>one-on-one.

>Once again I prove I do deal with Patrick one on one. He makes "Fat" remarks and
>then I give him a standard to judge by seeing how he has never seen me and
>besides he has already confirmed his wife approves of his activity and is aware
>of it! You don't want double standards do you? Every time that bastard cuts
>loose with a "Fat" insult I will remind him what he is married to which I will
>remind you now:

(and which I'll wipe right back out)

You're afraid of dealing with your own fat shadow, Bradbury. You're a loon.
(Thanks for continuing to provide evidence to that effect.)

>Now stick it where the sun doesn't shine you hypocrite Zhid!

Archived, in the event a court has to deal with you again. (Nah. You're
completely blameless, aren't you? :snicker:)

--PLH, there's malignantly stupid, and then there's Bradbury

knight57

unread,
Apr 20, 2003, 9:55:04 PM4/20/03
to
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message news:<catamont-F58AC3...@news.spellbndr.com>...

> In article <0nu5av4v6s5er8f3l...@4ax.com>,
> Eddie Haskell <Eddie_...@mayfield.net> wrote:
>
> > I haven't seen this posted so I will do so now.
> >
> > Tavish
> >
>
> Scott:
>
> If anything happens to Patrick's wife because of this information you
> have posted, you will be responsible for it, and I will make sure the
> authorities know about it. You should be ashamed of yourself. Everyone
> calls everyone else "fat" all the time. You've called me a pig, and made
> all kinds of pig-noises at me. I'm a grown-up, I have ignored it.
>
> Are you really so immature and thin-skinned that you can't take a little
> taunting?
>
> Sara


Fatboy has a double standard, Sara. He can dish it out but can't take
it.
He calls me a "kike" all the time.I just consider the source. It
affects me about as much as hearing a dog bark.

Bruno

knight57

unread,
Apr 20, 2003, 9:57:52 PM4/20/03
to
Jeffrey E. Salzberg <jeff.s...@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<MPG.190ccb34b...@news.verizon.net>...


He reminds me of the husbands who prove their masculinity by beating up their wives.

Bruno

>T-A-V-I-S-H<

unread,
Apr 21, 2003, 12:23:30 AM4/21/03
to
On 20 Apr 2003 21:57:53 GMT, <catamont-F58AC3...@news.spellbndr.com>
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>In article <0nu5av4v6s5er8f3l...@4ax.com>,
> Eddie Haskell <Eddie_...@mayfield.net> wrote:
>
>> I haven't seen this posted so I will do so now.
>>
>> Tavish
>>
:
>Scott:
>
>If anything happens to Patrick's wife because of this information you
>have posted, you will be responsible for it, and I will make sure the
>authorities know about it.

I am glad you are on record as stating that and I have your words archived for
future use.

By the same standards Yale F. Edeiken abused the legal system to get my
confidential information with a subpoena and my identity and address were then
illegally distributed because it was NEVER registered with the court.
(Nor was I given the chance as required by law to "quash" it and yes-- I can
prove at the time Yale was bombarding my e-mail box at the time. I saved all of
it! I had a premonition to save all of the evidence!!)

Forged child porn ads and numerous death threats were made against me as well as
property damage and ALL on account of Yale F. Edeiken!! Care to claim I would
have received the harassment I have received and am still receiving if it
weren't for Yale?

My confidential information was NOT in public domain NOR did it ever become
"Public Information" as you falsely claimed in the past seeing how the subpoena
was never registered with the court! Care to deny what I claim!?

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-1605042226560001%40ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net&rnum=2
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: Yale Now Admits To Distributing Subpoenaed Information to a Group
of People aka Re: WHY ARE WEB-NAZIS SUCH DEADBEATS?
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <catamont-160...@ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net>

In article <39221529....@news.flash.net>,
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:

>On Wed, 17 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
><iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:

>>> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
>>> get my ulisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
>>> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
:
>> None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
>>group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
:
>So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a
>group of people..."
>
>Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
>
>The "something" you mailed to a group of people was confidential
>information obtained using a subpoena. What you have confessed to is
>illegal activity!

Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.

Check.
Certified.
or Jumpsuit.

The choice is yours.

Sara

~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

My confidential information was NEVER rendered "public information" seeing how
the subpoena used to get it was not registered with the court or else it would
be on the docket along with all of the others! What Yale did was illegal and
unethical and he has exposed me to much harm because of it. Furthermore Yale
admitted above that he distributed the subpoenaed information to a mailing list
when he initially denied subpoenaing the information and then denied sending it
out via a mailing list as fully documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=n7726v4qoh4n02ajiohua8sgcj5cm3emvp%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Criminal Death Threats Made Against Me by the Plaintiff (Who Was His
Own Attorney)...
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 14:51:19 -0600
Message-ID: <n7726v4qoh4n02aji...@4ax.com>

On the other hand Patrick L. Humphrey has freely made his address and telephone
number available at his very own web site as these links testify:
http://www.io.com/~patrick/address.html
http://www.io.com/~patrick/address2.html

Any GOOGLE search will also render such as you see above:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=Patrick+and+Dale+Humphrey+Houston&num=20&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images

My confidential information on the other hand only appears on forged child p;orn
ads and other forms of criminal harassment and all on account of legal system
abuse by one man-- Yale F. Edeiken! I want you to deny the facts now! I want you
to deny how my former attorney was defamed and harassed because he defended me
and he as well as I never received a copy of the complaints fabricated against
me which you and Ken McVay posted long after I had a chance to refute them and
after Yale lost his kook lawsuit against me. If that malicious prosecution had
any merit at all (which it doesn't) then re-file it in the proper jurisdiction
with the same complaints and watch the counts of false swearing be tallied!

>You should be ashamed of yourself. Everyone calls everyone else "fat" all the time.
>You've called me a pig, and made all kinds of pig-noises at me.

That was then and this is now. I am tired of Patrick making references to where
I live and divulging personal information. If that hypocrite wants to keep
calling me "Fat" names then I will keep reminding him what he is married to with
the challenge to prove I am her size or larger!

>I'm a grown-up, I have ignored it.
>
>Are you really so immature and thin-skinned that you can't take a little
>taunting?

I am tired of being stalked from one post to another and getting the same
insults hundreds of times. Did not your fellow Pharisee have as one of his
complaints against me that I referred to you as a Sow?

BTW I really wish that you two would file that same lawsuit again in the proper
jurisdiction and then we will see what happens when my attorney rips it apart
and exposes the fabrication of evidence, the lies, death threats, legal system
abuse etc. that justice has yet to be served for!

Here is a hint at the legal system abuse:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...

Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: "Criminally Perjured Sworn Testimony" at the Web Site of Peter
Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel (He Supports Lies So He Can Use Them To Smear Me)
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>

>Sara

See I did not get rude.
Tavish

Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT

Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...

[...]

> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you

Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloP...@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>

Wally Cleaver

unread,
Apr 21, 2003, 12:24:08 AM4/21/03
to
On 20 Apr 2003 18:55:04 -0700, <abf0ff5d.03042...@posting.google.com>
tar...@indystart.com (knight57) wrote:

>Fatboy

<"Thar she blows-- Dale the Whale" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>

______________________________________________________________________

Wally Cleaver

unread,
Apr 21, 2003, 12:31:08 AM4/21/03
to
On 20 Apr 2003 19:56:57 -0500, <szkel3w...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
<pat...@io.com> wrote:

>(I'm archiving the choicer bits, myself, and Scottie had better start praying to
>whatever his gods are that nothing happens to my wife as a result of his obsessive
>re-posting of information he wasn't authorized to have in the first place.)

You made the information public yourself you stupid fool and it shows up with a
GOOGLE web search too! Want to continually blame me for YOUR stupidity!?
http://www.io.com/~patrick/address.html
http://www.io.com/~patrick/address2.html

You are being melodramatic. You are also a hypocrite seeing how you know I have
had property damage yet you still post where I live-- so fuck yourself!!

To quote Sara Salzman: "It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION."
My address etc. was not "public information because it was never registered with
the court or it would be on the docket printout! You made your info public
domain-- I did not! Live with it!

Tavish

Wally Cleaver

unread,
Apr 21, 2003, 12:31:45 AM4/21/03
to
On 20 Apr 2003 19:53:03 -0500, <szkist8...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
<pat...@io.com> wrote:

>your own fat shadow

<"Thar she blows-- Moby Chick" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>

Wally Cleaver

unread,
Apr 21, 2003, 2:17:20 AM4/21/03
to
On 20 Apr 2003 21:57:53 GMT, <catamont-F58AC3...@news.spellbndr.com>
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>Scott:
>
>If anything happens to Patrick's wife because of this information you
>have posted, you will be responsible for it, and I will make sure the
>authorities know about it. You should be ashamed of yourself.

By your standards then isn't Yale F. Edeiken responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have endured and am still enduring seeing how he was the one who
issued a subpoena to my ISP to get my address and telephone number and confirm
my real identity and then without registering the subpoena with the court (it
would be on the docket printout along with the others if he had) he distributed
the confidential info which has resulted in numerous death threats being made,
numerous child porn ads forged in my identity (and me getting visited twice by
the feds), numerous death threat telephone calls, my property being vandalized,
Peeping Toms like Patrick L. Humphrey constantly letting people know where I
live (it's easy to find people in small towns after they have been tipped off
which small town it is.)

Now do you want to go on record (going by your standards now) and admit
Yale F. Edeiken is responsible for all I have endured? Remember-- it took a
subpoena to invade my privacy and deprive me of it BUT your pal Patrick made all
of his info public domain with his web site!

As for the driver's license info which I received via e-mail-- what was on it
that Patrick doesn't have at his own publicly accessible web site other than
what his wife weighs and how tall she is!? Yale F. Edeiken subpoenaed my medical
records and then lied about the contents in his posting of said medical records.
Care to deny Yale claimed I weighed well over 300 pounds and that I was
diagnosed with "morbid obesity" which is what started Patrick and other slime
with their insults? For a fact that medical record has neither my height NOR my
weight on it and the diagnosis was "NARCOLEPSY" which is the reason why my
driving was restricted!! Morbidly obese people don't get discharges which
restrict their driving. That medical record is also on file with the court and
it was presented to the bench along with what Yale posted about it and what it
actually stated! Care to deny it? The bench also got to hear Yale's phone call
he made while obviously intoxicated accusing me of doing something I did not do
which he did a lot and he claimed he was going to make my life a living hell
too! I still have the phone call and so does the Lehigh County Civil Court yet
you clueless people wonder why he lost! You can claim jurisdiction all you want
BUT if that is the reason he lost then why didn't he re-file in the proper
jurisdiction? I really wish he would and then I would clean his bank account out
and I do have some very compelling witnesses too!

You say I should be ashamed but what about people who abuse the legal system for
personal vendettas and people who start evil lies? If I could have justice
served for all I have endured I would demand Deuteronomy 25:1-3 be incorporated
and not by some limp wristed sympathetic Rabbi BUT by a martial arts expert such
as they employ in Singapore when they do their canings. I would want each blow
to make a lasting impression!!!! BTW bearing false witness is a sin and a
criminal offense under Mosaic Law and Yale bore much false witness when he took
usenet posts other people made and then signed "Doc Tavish" to them and
submitted them as evidence against as well as how he fabricated a p;honey
digital signature and then attached it to a usenet post I did not make and then
submitted in a sworn statement I sent an "anonmus" e-mail and signed it Doc
Tavish and most of his lies are fully documented in these archives:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...

Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: "Criminally Perjured Sworn Testimony" at the Web Site of Peter
Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel (He Supports Lies So He Can Use Them To Smear Me)
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>

Forty strokes with a rod as prescribed by Law you Jews claim you adhere to would
be too lenient for what Yale has done to me and has caused for me.

And to think you people wonder why "anti-Semitism" is on the rise. People get
fed up with lying Pharisees, their smears, and their hypocrisy.

Tavish

[...]

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

______________________________________________________________________

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Apr 21, 2003, 1:07:23 PM4/21/03
to
On 21 Apr 2003 05:32:46 -0500, <szkptng...@eris.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
<pat...@io.com> wrote:

>Wally Cleaver <Wally_...@mayfield.net> writes:
>
>>On 20 Apr 2003 19:56:57 -0500, <szkel3w...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
>><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>>(I'm archiving the choicer bits, myself, and Scottie had better start
>>>praying to whatever his gods are that nothing happens to my wife as a result
>>>of his obsessive re-posting of information he wasn't authorized to have in
>>>the first place.)
:
>>You made the information public yourself you stupid fool and it shows up with
>>a GOOGLE web search too! Want to continually blame me for YOUR stupidity!?
>>http://www.io.com/~patrick/address.html
>>http://www.io.com/~patrick/address2.html

:
>Idiot. Where on those two pages is my wife's driver's license displayed?

Where did I claim that it did? All the info on Dale's TDL is essentially
displayed (by your doing too) at your own web site except for her weight which
seems to be a disputed 320 pounds.

>(Do try and keep up with the conversation, won't you?)

You're the one not keeping up.

>>Any GOOGLE search will also render such as you see above:
>>http://www.google.com/search?as_q=Patrick+and+Dale+Humphrey+Houston&num=20&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images
>
>>You are being melodramatic. You are also a hypocrite seeing how you know I
>>have had property damage yet you still post where I live-- so fuck yourself!!

:
>So? I've never posted your address. Thank your friends for that.

Edeiken and Shiff are not my friends.

>(and yourself for giving it away, too)

A lie! I did not give it away. Yale did on the night of December 14, 1999 when I
was in the hospital and he was making his first death threat! He had to issue a
subpoena to get it too!

> So, is it true that those windows that got broken were supposedly outside the house?
> Curious...

Another one of your delusions? Where did I ever state my windows were outside my
house?

>>To quote Sara Salzman: "It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION." My
>>address etc. was not "public information because it was never registered with
>>the court or it would be on the docket printout! You made your info public
>>domain-- I did not! Live with it!

:
>No one made my wife's driver's license public domain -- but you and your thug
>friends certainly tried.

Another lie by the master of lies!

>Choke on that fact, Fatbum.

<"Thar she blows-- Dale the Whale" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>

>
>--PLH, and quit terrorizing the local Dairy Queen

Haven't been there in years you bastard!

<"Thar she blows-- Moby Chick" http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html>

Tavish

Larry Mondello

unread,
Apr 22, 2003, 11:27:24 AM4/22/03
to
On 21 Apr 2003 22:21:45 -0500, <szksmsb8b...@eris.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
<pat...@io.com> wrote:

>No, I'm seeking to have you abide by the user agreement you signed with your
>ISP. I don't think posting TDL data qualifies.

As Sara Salzman would say: "It's public information."

BTW-- it doesn't look like you're laughing! I have never seen you laugh! Are you
trying to mask your real emotions?

Tavish

Also BTW-- the real kook is you-- a self coinfessed Peeping Tom who wants to
peek in other men's windows as proven here:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey

Why would you be peeking into windows Patrick and especially males' windows? Do
winkies turn you on?

WARNING TO HOUSTONIANS: Watch out Patrick L. Humphrey is on the prowl and it may
be your window he tries to peek into tonight. Patrick inhabits SouthWest Houston
area.

Tavish

---
"Liberalism is a mental illness." -- Michael Savage - Host of the Savage Nation
Radio Show and Founder of the Paul Revere Society
http://sites.hsprofessional.com/prs/frontpage.html
http://newsmax.com/pundits/Savage.shtml
OUR MISSION STATEMENT
Michael Savage founded The Paul Revere Society (PRS). With a crisis of
leadership threatening the United States, PRS stands for the reassertion of our
borders, our language, and our culture.
Some say that the borders are arbitrary, English is only one of many
languages in our new "Multicultural America," and that we share no common
history or values. We believe in the Sovereignty of our Nation. That English is
our national "glue." And that we all do share in the pillars of the Bible, the
U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. These documents and what they stand
for are our common cultural heritage.
The Paul Revere Society (PRS) will assert the values inherent in these
pillars of freedom. We will seek to educate the citizenry about our nation's
freedoms.

0 new messages