If a citizen feels he/she has been "defamed," then I invite that
citizen to make his or her case in a court of law. That won't happen,
of course, because the claim is unsupportable.
[...]
>I asked why should a "website" be awarding tax receipts and I get
>personally attacked!
Anyone stupid enough to ask the question has nothing to complain
about, particularly since Nizkor has never "awarded" a tax receipt to
anyone. Nor, I might add, has Nizkor ever claimed to be able to
provide such receipts. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence (which
clearly omits Mr. Bradbury) knows that.
As I've said before: Mr. Bradbury is not only too stupid to understand
the answer, Mr. Bradbury is too stupid to understand the question,
too.
[...]
>CCRA said: "we have no record of a registered charity by the name of
>Nizkor.org." (Letter included below) Only registered charities are allowed
>to issue "Canadian receipts"!!
Gee, what a surprise. I've been saying that Nizkor wasn't a registered
charity since about 1992, and the Government of Canada has confirmed
my statements. Duh.
As I've said before: Mr. Bradbury is not only too stupid to understand
the answer, Mr. Bradbury is too stupid to understand the question,
too. Don't believe me? Check this out:
[...]
>Glad to see you making that a public record. Care to explain how a website
>not being either an "NPO nor a Charity" can operate as you do and issue tax
>receipts?
Nizkor has never issued - or offered to issue - a tax receipt.
As I've said before: Mr. Bradbury is not only too stupid to understand
the answer, Mr. Bradbury is too stupid to understand the question,
too.
The word "dense" comes to mind here as well:
>Notice what CCRA said about "issu[ing] charitable receipts for tax
>purposes"? Look at McVay's operation and see if it complies with the law
>stated above: "NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations.." yet Ken
>McVay's very own NIZKOR page says: "Donations over $10.00 will receive a
>Canadian tax receipt." Ken McVay also claims that NIZKOR is NOT a charity
>as shown down further in this post.
The page does not say, of course, what Mr. Bradbury claims that it
says. It does not say that Nizkor issues receipts.
As I've said before: Mr. Bradbury is not only too stupid to understand
the answer, Mr. Bradbury is too stupid to understand the question,
too.
As if he wanted to make absolutely certain that he is simply too
stupid to understand, he cites a quotation of mine:
"McVay/Nizkor" has never issued tax receipts of any sort, Mr.
Grosvenor, so it's rather silly to suggest we got "caught at it."
>Well now we know Nizkor is not a "charitable organization" so it has to be
>an NPO?! So why does Ken McVay's NPO declare at its web page: "Donations
Poor Mr. Bradbury... he has been told, of course, that Nizkor is
neither a charitable organization or an NPO, that it is, in fact, a
website. In short, as his own words have shown, I have told him the
truth.
As I've said before: Mr. Bradbury is not only too stupid to understand
the answer, Mr. Bradbury is too stupid to understand the question,
too.
>over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt" which would be in
>violation of: "NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations" but Ken McVay
>lies to a person who's an object of his smear campaign: "McVay/Nizkor" has
>never issued tax receipts of any sort.." Then again KcVay admitted higher
>up in this post: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a
>website." See how NIZKOR skirts all criteria of the tax laws?
[109 lines of the same ignorance]
Mr. Bradbury's problem seems to be that he believes that Nizkor or Ken
McVay issues tax receipts, in spite of having been told that this is
not true.
Mr. Grosvenor has made the same rather stupid claim since 1996, but
has yet to provide the proof... heck, I even told Grosvenor _exactly_
how to prove his case, and he ran for the hills... he's STILL running.
So I'll make the same offer to Mr. Bradbury: Donate $10 to Nizkor,
using the form provided, and when you receive your receipt, send it to
the Government of Canada in support of your (libelous) claim. Tell
them that the receipt "proves" that Ken McVay and/or Nizkor issues
receipts.
As I've said before: Mr. Bradbury is not only too stupid to understand
the answer, Mr. Bradbury is too stupid to understand the question,
too.
--
"...I note that on the few occasions of which I am aware where purveyors of
anti-Semitic propaganda have endeavoured to justify their materials in
court on the facts and the merits, they have been singularly unsuccessful..."
(http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/hweb/people/s/scully-olga/reason.html)